Category Archives: Barack Obama

Fiona Hill testimony demolishes Christopher Steele dossier and media reporting, Scathing portrayal of Steele, President was attacked as well

Fiona Hill testimony demolishes Christopher Steele dossier and media reporting, Scathing portrayal of Steele, President was attacked as well

“And also, the point that actually hasn’t come out and,
again, why I’ve been very cross in the media, is that the
President was attacked as well, because the Russians sought
to discredit him.

And I’ve been very unhappy with the media coverage of
all of this, which is why I don’t want to start, you know,
kind of basically doing testimony by virtue of an article
that you’ve read in Politico. Because everybody wants to
sensationalize things, everybody wants to spend time looking
at the things that seem sexy, and they don’t want to actually
look at, you know, talk to what the facts are.”...Fiona Hill testimony

“Hill said she was “shocked” to find out that Steele was the author of the dossier, in part because she had known him to “constantly try to drum up business.””…The Daily Caller

“If I had my choice I would kill every reporter in the world but I am sure we would be getting reports from hell before breakfast.”… William Tecumseh Sherman

 

From The Daily Caller.

“Impeachment Witness Undercut Steele Dossier In Bombshell Testimony

  • Fiona Hill, who was the top Russia expert at the White House, told lawmakers in October that she believed Russians fed disinformation to dossier author Christopher Steele.
  • Hill offered a scathing portrayed of Steele during a deposition she gave as part of the Democratic-led impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump. 
  • Hill said she was “shocked” to find out that Steele was the author of the dossier, in part because she had known him to “constantly try to drum up business.” 
  • The FBI relied heavily on Steele’s information for its investigation into possible Trump-Russia collusion.

A former White House official who Democrats consider a key witness in their impeachment inquiry told lawmakers in October that she believed Russians likely planted disinformation about President Donald Trump with dossier author Christopher Steele.

Fiona Hill, who served as the White House’s top adviser on Russia affairs until July, told lawmakers she was “shocked” to find out that Steele, a former MI6 officer, was the author of the dossier. That’s in large part because when she had met with Steele in the years leading up to his dossier work, he was “constantly try to drum up business.”

“Because if you also think about it, the Russians would have an ax to grind against him given the job that he had previously. And if he started going back through his old contacts and asking about, that would be a perfect opportunity for people to feed some kind of misinformation,” said Hill, who was a scholar at the Brookings Institution until she joined the Trump administration.

Hill said she was not aware of the dossier until a colleague showed it to her day before BuzzFeed published it on Jan. 10, 2017.

When she read the report, Hill said she had “misgivings and concern that [Steele] could have been played.”

“I almost fell over when I discovered that he was doing this report,” Hill said of Steele, who she said she worked with from 2006 to 2009, when she served as a national intelligence officer.

Hill said she met most recently with Steele in 2016 and saw from those meetings that he “was clearly very interested in building up a client base.”

“And this is why I was concerned about the Steele report because that is a vulnerability,” said Hill.

“Christopher Steele going out and looking for information. He’s obviously out there soliciting information,” she added. “What a great opportunity to, basically, you know, present him with information that he’s looking for that can be couched some truth and some disinformation.”

Read more:
Read testimony here:

OIG report Victoria Toensing: “very bad for the people in the Obama administration”, Joe diGenova: on highest levels of DOJ & FBI “it’s going to be devastating.”

OIG report Victoria Toensing: “very bad for the people in the Obama administration”, Joe diGenova: on highest levels of DOJ & FBI “it’s going to be devastating.”

“is going to be very bad for the people in the Obama administration. My source said to me, “It’s going to be worse than you can imagine.”…Victoria Toensing on OIG FISA report

“I would say explosive and I would say, for people at the highest levels of the FBI and at the highest levels of the Justice Department–more important at the Justice Department–it’s going to be devastating. It’s going to ruin careers, it’s going to make people have bar problems”…Joe diGenova on OIG FISA report

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

 

Victoria Toensing and Joe diGenova, on the Lou Dobbs show last night, explained what they believe will be the impact of the upcoming OIG FISA report.

Text provided by Meaning In History.

Two major takeaways:

1) The delay on the OIG FISA report is “partially” due to John Durham’s new Grand Jury activity–which can only mean that Durham is already taking testimony from persons named in IG Horowitz’s report, and

2) Durham is actively investigating the leak of the Flynn/Kislyak phone call to David Ignatius of the WaPo, which diGenova describes as “a 20 year felony.” Ouch! Maybe that person–or persons–will want to go for a deal? But they’ll have to have something truly major to offer. Something that Durham can’t get without their cooperation. And count on it

From the transcript:

“Victoria Toensing: I can tell you this, and we have darn good sources for this, it [the OIG FISA report] is going to be very bad for the people in the Obama administration. My source said to me, “It’s going to be worse than you can imagine.”

Joe diGenova: I would say explosive and I would say, for people at the highest levels of the FBI and at the highest levels of the Justice Department–more important at the Justice Department–it’s going to be devastating. It’s going to ruin careers, it’s going to make people have bar problems …

Victoria Toensing: Bill Barr problems! [laughs]

Joe diGenova: No, no, bar association problems. What’s clear, now we know is that the senior levels of the Obama Justice Department were complicit in knowingly submitting materially false applications to the FISA Court for an illegitimate counterintelligence purpose. Not for a legitimate purpose, but to spy on Americans for political purposes. And it really will end up being the beginning of the greatest political scandal in history. And it [the OIG FISA report] is being held up partially because of John Durham’s new Grand Jury, which by the way exists for one reason and one reason only – because people are going to be indicted.

Lou Dobbs: Now, he [Durham] is in charge of both FISA abuse and the origins of Spygate, whatever you want to call it–the worst political scandal in this country’s history. Is anything being held up because of simply the vast scope of his investigation?

Victoria Toensing: It’s been expanded, Lou. He’s now going into whole other areas. He’s going back into the origins of the investigation. For those of us who know this business, if you’re in counterintelligence and you get word that George Papadopoulos has said he’s heard something, that the Russians have something, you know what you do? You go knock on his door within a week and ask him about it, and have him give you the information, where did he get it … They didn’t do that. They didn’t do that at all. They disobeyed all the rules of a counterintelligence investigation.”

Read more:

http://meaninginhistory.blogspot.com/2019/11/digenova-and-toensing-on-barrs-hatchet.html

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Sidney Powell surreply November 4, 2019, “Andrew McCabe as much as admitted the FBI’s intent to set up Mr. Flynn on a criminal false statement charge”

Sidney Powell surreply November 4, 2019, “Andrew McCabe as much as admitted the FBI’s intent to set up Mr. Flynn on a criminal false statement charge”

“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell October 23, 2019

“Former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe as much as admitted the FBI’s intent to set up Mr. Flynn on a criminal false statement charge from the get-go.”…Attorney Sidney Powell November 4, 2019

“Truth, due process, evidence, rights of the accused: All are swept aside in pursuit of the progressive agenda.
George Orwell’s 1949 dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four is no longer fiction. We are living it right now.”…National Review September 25, 2018

 

From United States v. Michael Flynn

Filed November 4, 2019 by Attorney Sidney Powell.

“MR. FLYNN’S SUR-SURREPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO COMPEL
PRODUCTION OF BRADY MATERIAL AND FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE”

“If accepted, the government’s approach would allow endless manipulation by prosecutors: target individuals, run search warrants, seize devices, interrogate for days, threaten family members, cajole, but never charge until the clock strikes midnight once a plea is extracted. Yet playing cat-and-mouse with the Due Process Clause is the opposite of what the Brady-BagleyGiglio line of cases is all about. Perhaps even more significantly, the government’s position
wholly ignores this Court’s Standing Order, which not only has no such timing requirements, but is issued for the precise purpose of eliminating the games the government played here.”

“The government has known since prior to January 24, 2017, that it intended to target Mr. Flynn for federal prosecution. That is why the entire “investigation” of him was created at least as early as summer 2016 and pursued despite the absence of a legitimate basis. That is why Peter Strzok texted Lisa Page on January 10, 2017: “Sitting with Bill watching CNN. A TON more out. .
. We’re discussing whether, now that this is out, we can use it as a pretext to go interview some people.” 3 The word “pretext” is key. Thinking he was communicating secretly only with his paramour before their illicit relationship and extreme bias were revealed to the world, Strzok let
the cat out of the bag as to what the FBI was up to. Try as he might, Mr. Van Grack cannot stuff that cat back into that bag.4

Former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe as much as admitted the FBI’s intent to set up Mr. Flynn on a criminal false statement charge from the get-go. On Dec. 19, 2017, McCabe told the House Intelligence Committee in sworn testimony: “[T]he conundrum that we faced on their return from the interview is that although [the agents] didn’t detect deception in the statements
that he made in the interview . . . the statements were inconsistent with our understanding of the conversation that he had actually had with the ambassador.” McCabe proceeded to admit to the Committee that “the two people who interviewed [Flynn] didn’t think he was lying, [which] was not [a] great beginning of a false statement case.” Ex. 1.”

“But here, to use Strzok’s own words, the investigation was “a pretext;” the object of the interview was to secure, rather than prevent, a 1001 violation. The “poor
start” further reveals Mr. McCabe’s determination to create a case despite the agents’ belief Mr. Flynn was telling the truth. Having such concrete evidence as to the prosecution’s thinking processes is rare; having it in text messages and sworn congressional testimony is priceless.”

“The Strzok-Page text messages confirm that Lisa Page had two opportunities to edit drafts of the crucial 302. Strzok returned to his FBI office the night of February 10, 2017, to input the edits she made on the draft she had earlier left in Bill [Priestap’s] office (about which they hatch a cover-story), then sent her another version over the weekend. The government thus implicitly
admits there was at least one version prior to the February 10 edition.”

Read more:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.135.0_1.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brennan Obama motivation for Trump removal: Treason, Brennan employee breached Obama passport data, Trump began questioning Obama in 2011

Brennan Obama motivation for Trump removal: Treason, Brennan employee breached Obama passport data, Trump began questioning Obama in 2011

“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell October 23, 2019

“And according to NBC NewsDurham has set his sights on former CIA Director John Brennan and former national intelligence director James Clapper.”…Zero Hedge

“Following the breach, State Department managers met with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph Biden, whose committee has oversight over the Foreign Service and the passport office. Biden will be sworn in as Obama’s vice president on Jan. 20.”...NewsMax January 12, 2009

 

The Trump removal coup/persecution did not begin with his election.

Apparently John Brennan is at the center of this with the aid and blessing of Barack Obama.

They both have many reasons to out Trump.

But simply it boils down to the fact that they both could be charged with treason.

Donald Trump began aggresively questioning Obama’s records and eligibility for the presidency in 2011.

From Citizen Wells March 27, 2011.

“Donald Trump was interviewed by Geraldo Rivera.

Geraldo: “There is something very Strange going on. He spent a lot of money to keep this out of print. There’s something very very strange going on. A lot of legal fees. Why can’t he produce a birth certificate?””

https://citizenwells.com/2011/03/27/donald-trump-on-geraldo-rivera-obama-birth-certificate-there-is-a-chance-that-he-wasnt-born-in-this-country/

From Citizen Wells March 28, 2011.

“Donald Trump continued with his mission to question the whereabouts of President Obama’s birth certificate, in an appearance on Fox & Friends this morning.”

“Trump admits there may be newspaper ads suggesting Obama was born in Hawaii, but claims there are a lot of reasons to explain the existence for such ads. And Trump declares Obama “spent millions of dollars trying to get away from this issue, millions of dollars in legal fees.” Apparently people are calling Trump from all over to not back down on this issue, and it seems he is listening to their advice as he repeatedly stressed here “if you’re not born in the United States, you cannot be President.””

https://citizenwells.com/2011/03/28/trump-obama-spends-millions-in-legal-fees-avoid-presenting-birth-certificate-why-has-obama-employed-attorneys/

From Citizen Wells March 29, 2011.

“Billionaire developer and possible Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is now suggesting Barack Obama’s presidency could be “illegal” if legitimate proof is not provided demonstrating the commander in chief is indeed a “natural born citizen” of the U.S.

Trump’s use of the “I” word came last night during a phone interview with Greta Van Susteren of the Fox News Channel.”

“Here’s the president of the United States, and no doctor, no nurse, nobody’s come forward saying, ‘I delivered that beautiful baby.’””

https://citizenwells.com/2011/03/29/donald-trump-obamas-presidency-may-be-illegal-greta-van-susteren-fox-obama-birth-certificate-natural-born-citizen-eligibility/

From Citizen Wells April 7, 2011.

MEREDITH VIEIRA: You have people now out there searching– I mean, in Hawaii?

DONALD TRUMP: Absolutely. And they cannot believe what they’re finding. And I’m serious–”

https://citizenwells.com/2011/04/07/donald-trump-investigators-in-hawaii-obama-birth-certificate-they-cannot-believe-what-theyre-finding/

On November 1, 2012 Donald Trump offered $ 5 million for the release of Barack Obama’s college, passport and other records.

Obama’s passport file was breached by an employee of John Brennan in March 2008.

According to a NewsMax article the main target was Obama and the purpose was to cauterize his passport data.

From Citizen Wells April 20, 2009.

“Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser, John O. Brennan, heads a firm that was cited in March for breaching sensitive files in the State Department’s passport office, according to a State Department Inspector General’s report released this past July.”

“During a State Department briefing on March 21, 2008, McCormack confirmed that the contractor had accessed the passport files of presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and John McCain, and that the inspector general had launched an investigation.
Sources who tracked the investigation tell Newsmax that the main target of the breach was the Obama passport file, and that the contractor accessed the file in order to “cauterize” the records of potentially embarrassing information.”

The original link to the Newsmax article vanished.

Fortunately it is still available.

From NewsMax January 12, 2009.

“Obama’s Intelligence Adviser Involved in Security Breach”

“At the time of the breach, Brennan was working as an unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign.”

“The passport files include “personally identifiable information such as the applicant’s name, gender, social security number, date and place of birth, and passport number,” according to the inspector general report.

The files may contain additional information including “original copies of the associated documents,” the report added. Such documents include birth certificates, naturalization certificates, or oaths of allegiance for U.S.-born persons who adopted the citizenship of a foreign country as minors.”

“Following the breach, State Department managers met with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph Biden, whose committee has oversight over the Foreign Service and the passport office. Biden will be sworn in as Obama’s vice president on Jan. 20.

The State Department Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a 104-page report on the breach last July. Although it is stamped “Sensitive but Unclassified,” the report was heavily redacted in the version released to the public, with page after page blacked out entirely.”

Read more:

https://www.newsmax.com/KenTimmerman/brennan-passport-breach/2009/01/12/id/337482/

The revelations from this article are highly significant:

  1. An employee of John Brennan’s breached Obama’s passport file.
  2. According to NewsMax source, the reason was to cauterize Obama’s data.
  3. Joe Biden was on the committee that had oversight over the passport office.
  4. The 104 page report from the State Department Office of Inspector General (OIG) was heavily redacted. Why?
  5. Why was the link to the original article from NewsMax changed?

The report to the public of the OIG investigation barely alludes to the breach in question.

Special Briefing On The State Department Inspector General’s Report on Passport Records Access

“MS. FULTZ: We have and have had a system in place where – it’s called the monitor list, where certain high profile individuals were – their records were flagged so that if it was accessed, someone would follow up to make sure it was authorized. And that’s how the original cases came to anyone’s attention.
QUESTION: Is that the list of the 38 names?
MS. FULTZ: No. It’s —
QUESTION: Or is it bigger than that?
MS. FULTZ: The original cases in March that started the – started to generate attention.”

“QUESTION: Was it post the March disclosures of the presidential candidates’ files being improperly accessed? I mean, is it since this erupted in the public, or did you do it before? I don’t need the date. I’m just wondering when it occurred to you that’d be a good idea.”

https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2008/07/106518.htm

Brennan and Obama had no worries as long as Hillary became president.

Apparently John Brennan is being investigated by Durham.

If there is any hope that all is not lost, Brennan should be indicted with Obama to follow.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Sidney Powell for Michael Flynn request for Joseph Mifsud data and other Brady material, Government response October 29, 2019, “not…material to the defendant’s guilt”???

Sidney Powell for Michael Flynn request for Joseph Mifsud data and other Brady material, Government response October 29, 2019, “not…material to the defendant’s guilt”???

“Mr. McCabe pointed to Mr. Flynn’s “very public interactions with Vladimir Putin and other Russians.” These “interactions” seem to have arisen from the work of CIA/FBI operatives Stefan Halper and Joseph Mifsud”…Sidney Powell motion October 25, 2019

“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell October 23, 2019

Mueller, as a matter of determined policy, omitted key steps which any honest investigator would undertake. He did not commission any forensic examination of the DNC servers. He did not interview Bill Binney. He did not interview Julian Assange. His failure to do any of those obvious things renders his report worthless.”…Craig Murray

 

I guess the prosecutors in the US v Michael Flynn case are desperate (or just corrupt and covering each other’s asses).

A pre law or for that matter average middle school student could blow their latest argument out of the water.

Attorney Sidney Powell will.

And the judge, if not too corrupt, should see it as another prosecution ploy to subvert justice.

From the motions:

“The United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, respectfully files this response to defendant Michael Flynn’s Motion to Produce Newly Discovered Brady Evidence, United States v. Flynn, 17-cr-232 (Doc. 124) (D.D.C. Oct. 15, 2019). In the motion, the defendant requests information pertaining to two phones that allegedly “were used by Mr.Joseph Mifsud” and are allegedly in the possession of the government. Id. at 2. According to the
defendant, the phones contain information on individuals tasked against the defendant as early as 2014. Id. 1

The requested materials are not favorable and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment, or even relevant to this criminal case.”

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.130.0_8.pdf

“In an extraordinary reversal, the defendant now claims that he is innocent of the criminal charge in this case. See, e.g., Reply at 2 (“When the Director of the FBI, and a group of his close associates, plot to set up an innocent man and create a crime . . . .”). For the first time, the defendant represents to this Court that he “was honest with the agents [on January 24, 2017] to the best of his recollection at the time.” Reply at 23. He makes this claim despite having admitted his guilt, under oath, before two federal judges (including this Court). The defendant also argues—based almost entirely on evidence previously provided in discovery—that the government engaged in “conduct so shocking to the conscience and so inimical to our system of justice that it requires the dismissal of the charges [sic] for outrageous government conduct.”
Reply at 2. The Reply then seeks a new category of relief, that “this Court . . . dismiss the entire prosecution for outrageous government misconduct.”1
Reply at 32.”

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.131.0_2.pdf

From Sidney Powell’s motion filed October 25, 2019.

The Mueller Report established that there was no conspiracy between anyone in the Trump campaign and Russia. It is also apparent now, or will be upon the release of the FISA report of the Inspector General, that the FBI and DOJ had no legal basis to obtain a FISA warrant against Carter Page or to investigate Mr. Flynn.13 Yet, the government wants us to accept its word that the defense has everything to which it is entitled. Fortunately Brady exists to protect the accused
“from the prosecutor’s private deliberations, as the chosen forum for ascertaining the truth about criminal accusations.” Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 440 (1995).

While Flynn was cooperating extensively on all issues the Special Counsel wanted to address, the government has trickled out productions over the last year that reveal many things. Ex. 15. Some of the most notable include : (i) the original notes of the agents differ materially from the 302s; (ii) there were material alterations to the 302s to set up the “false statements,” and (iii)
the government has extensive reports of Mr. Flynn’s briefings and debriefings on all his foreign contacts—including his Russia trip and his meeting with Turkish officials—giving lie yet again to the public pretext of the FBI “investigation” of Mr. Flynn. Further, what is still a heavily redacted 302 for former Agent Strzok, since January 2017, the government knew, but still has not disclosed the full statements and notes that show Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates said the interview of Mr. Flynn was “problematic,” and she was “unclear” why the FBI was investigating or interviewing Mr. Flynn at all.”

“12 Mr. McCabe pointed to Mr. Flynn’s “very public interactions with Vladimir Putin and other Russians.” These “interactions” seem to have arisen from the work of CIA/FBI operatives Stefan Halper and Joseph Mifsud, and bookings made by Mr. Flynn’s American speakers’ bureau,
Leading Authorities (which books engagements for countless former government officials and prominent people). Leading Authorities booked him for three events with “Russian connections”: one in Moscow for RT and two in Washington. All were well attended by prominent persons from
around the world because of the important issues discussed and the presence of other recognized experts on the programs. See Ex. 14; MTC 4, 16.

Mifsud was present at the RT dinner in Moscow, and it is his cell phones recently obtained by the government that are expected to confirm that he was working for “western intelligence.” Dkt. 124.

Stefan Halper is a known long-time operative for the CIA/FBI. He was paid exorbitant sums by the FBI/CIA/DOD through the Department of Defense Department’s Office of Net Assessment in 2016. His tasks seem to have included slandering Mr. Flynn with accusations of having an affair with a young professor (a British national of Russian descent) Flynn met at an official dinner
at Cambridge University when he was head of DIA in 2014. Flynn has requested the records of Col. James Baker because he was Halper’s “handler” in the Office of Net Assessment in the Pentagon, and ONA Director Baker regularly lunched with Washington Post Reporter David Ignatius. Baker is believed to be the person who illegally leaked the transcript of Mr. Flynn’s calls to Ignatius. The defense has requested the phone records of James Clapper to confirm his contacts with Washington Post reporter Ignatius—especially on January 10, 2017, when Clapper told Ignatius in words to the effect of “take the kill shot on Flynn.” It cannot escape mention that the press has long had transcripts of the Kislyak calls that the government has denied to the defense.
MTC 34, 35, 37.”

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.129.0_1.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Butowsky v. Folkenflik NPR et al motion quotes attorney Sidney Powell in Flynn case, “FBI officials systematically tampered with records and hid exculpatory evidence”

Butowsky v. Folkenflik NPR et al motion quotes attorney Sidney Powell in Flynn case, “FBI officials systematically tampered with records and hid
exculpatory evidence”

“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell October 23, 2019

Mueller, as a matter of determined policy, omitted key steps which any honest investigator would undertake. He did not commission any forensic examination of the DNC servers. He did not interview Bill Binney. He did not interview Julian Assange. His failure to do any of those obvious things renders his report worthless.”…Craig Murray

“Fox News news analyst Ellen Ratner relayed information from Wikileaks founder Julian Assange to Texas businessman Ed Butowsky regarding Seth Rich’s role in transferring emails to Wikileaks, according to an amended lawsuit that I filed this morning on behalf of Mr. Butowsky.”…Attorney Ty Clevenge

 

From Edward Butowsky v. David Folkenflik, et al filed October 28, 2019.

PLAINTIFF’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION TO COMPLY WITH
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

“A lot has happened in the short period since the Plaintiff filed his MOTION TO
COMPEL and the government filed the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL (Doc. No. 76) (hereinafter “FBI RESPONSE”). In a reply filed on October 24, 2019 in United States v. Michael T. Flynn,
Case No. 1:17-cr-00232-EGS (D.D.C.), attorney Sidney Powell laid out damning
evidence that high-ranking FBI officials systematically tampered with records and hid exculpatory evidence for the purpose of framing the defendant, retired General Mike Flynn. The reply itself is sealed, but Ms. Powell publicly posted a redacted version online, and the Plaintiff has attached a copy as Exhibit 1. The Plaintiff requests that the Court take judicial notice of that attachment or obtain a copy of the reply (and its exhibits) directly from the D.C. court.

As the Court is probably aware, the criminal charges against General Flynn are an integral part of the “Russia Collusion Hoax” outlined in the Plaintiff’s SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. See, e.g., Petr Svab, “Did Flynn Just Call Out Mueller on Under-the-Table Plea Deal?”, The Epoch Times, July 14, 2019 (https://www.theepochtimes.com/did-flynnjust-call-out-mueller-on-under-the-table-plea-deal_3001928.html). If the FBI is willing to conceal records and tamper with evidence in order to frame a highly-decorated former
military officer, all for the purpose of promoting and protecting a political hoax, then it should not be difficult to believe that the FBI would conceal records about Seth Rich in order to protect that same hoax.”

Read more:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.183024/gov.uscourts.txed.183024.77.0.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

John Brennan exposed by Citizen Journalists, Citizen Wells et al, March 2008 warnings on Obama Brennan, Brennan firm cauterized Obama passport file?

John Brennan exposed by Citizen Journalists, Citizen Wells et al, March 2008 warnings on Obama Brennan, Brennan firm cauterized Obama passport file?

“Vivek Kundra, who was tapped as the White House technology czar
March 5, oversaw technology projects and budgets for 86 D.C.
government agencies as head of the District’s Office of the Chief
Technology Officer.”
“Yusuf Acar, 40, who has worked in the technology office since
2004, was charged with bribery, conspiracy, money laundering and
conflict of interest.”
“Acar also told the informant that he could use computers to
create fake D.C. birth certificates, Hibarger said.”…Citizen Wells from pre rectified Washington Post article dated March 13, 2009

“Who benefited most from the suicide/murder of Orlando Jones?
Who benefited most from the murder of Donald Young?
Who benefited most from the murder of Lt. Quarles Harris Jr.?
Who benefited most from the suicide/murder of Christopher Kelly?
Who benefited most from the murder of Bill Gwatney?
Who benefited most from the death/murder of Andrew Breitbart?
And now
Loretta Fuddy?”…Citizen Wells

 

There are many reasons why John Brennan did not want Donald Trump elected.

Apparently he has been working hard behind the scenes to remove Trump.

Will he finally be prosecuted?

“The DOJ’s Russiagate Probe Just Turned Into A Criminal Investigation

What began as an administrative review by the Justice Department into the origins of Russiagate has “shifted” to a criminal inquiry, according to the New York Times, citing two people familiar with the matter.”

“And according to NBC NewsDurham has set his sights on former CIA Director John Brennan and former national intelligence director James Clapper.”

https://citizenwells.com/2019/10/25/john-durham-criminal-investigation-to-begin-power-to-subpoena-documents-and-witnesses-impanel-grand-jury-and-file-criminal-charges-brennan-clapper-focus/

 

From Citizen Wells March 21, 2008.

“I just received this comment and thought it worthy of highlighting.”

“Obama has a dual citizenship with Kenya. His passport was breached today by inquiring minds because Obama is an anti-Israel pro-pan-arabism Islamic-socialist who has ties to marxist Libyan president Muammar al Gadaffi, Syrian tycoon Antoin Rezko, Saudi Arabian sheikhs, and Rezko’s “close friend” 3.5 million money pal Auchi, the one who gave Obama fundraiser money: Iraqi billionaire global arms dealer Nadhmi Auchi”

“Marxist Nicaraguan President’s endorsement is for Obama, and he says: “It’s not to say that there is already a revolution under way in the U.S.; but yes, they [supporters of Barack Obama] are laying the foundations for a revolutionary change”

https://citizenwells.com/2008/03/21/barack-obama-passport-kenya-anti-israel-pro-arabism-islamic-socialist-rezko-auchi-saddam-hussein-odinga-marxist-black-panthers/

From Citizen Wells April 20, 2009.

“Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser, John O. Brennan, heads a firm that was cited in March for breaching sensitive files in the State Department’s passport office, according to a State Department Inspector General’s report released this past July.”

“During a State Department briefing on March 21, 2008, McCormack confirmed that the contractor had accessed the passport files of presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and John McCain, and that the inspector general had launched an investigation.
Sources who tracked the investigation tell Newsmax that the main target of the breach was the Obama passport file, and that the contractor accessed the file in order to “cauterize” the records of potentially embarrassing information.”

https://citizenwells.com/2009/04/20/obama-birth-certificate-forgery-obama-corruption-vivek-kundra-yusuf-acar-forged-documents-john-brennan-passport-security-breach-long-form-birth-certificate-forgery/

The above segment was from a NewsMax article that has been scrubbed.

The new link to the NewsMax article:

https://www.newsmax.com/KenTimmerman/brennan-passport-breach/2009/01/12/id/337482/

Also from the NewsMax article, not reported at Citizen Wells earlier:

““They looked at the McCain and Clinton files as well to create confusion,” one knowledgeable source told Newsmax. “But this was basically an attempt to cauterize the Obama file.”

At the time of the breach, Brennan was working as an unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign.”

“Following the breach, State Department managers met with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joseph Biden, whose committee has oversight over the Foreign Service and the passport office. Biden will be sworn in as Obama’s vice president on Jan. 20.

The State Department Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a 104-page report on the breach last July. Although it is stamped “Sensitive but Unclassified,” the report was heavily redacted in the version released to the public, with page after page blacked out entirely.”

“Had Brennan been appointed CIA director, as rumored in the Obama campaign shortly after the election, senators also would have questioned him about an article he wrote in an obscure foreign policy magazine over the summer.

The article, entitled “The Conundrum of Iran: Strengthening Moderates without Acquiescing to Belligerence,” appeared in the July issue of “The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.”

Among other recommendations, it argued that the next U.S. administration should grant political legitimacy to the terrorist organizations Hezbollah and Hamas, and should exercise “strategic patience” with Iran rather than engaging in “bellicose” rhetoric and coercive diplomacy.”

“Key witness in passport fraud case fatally shot”

“A key witness in a federal probe into passport information stolen from the State Department was fatally shot in front of a District church, the Metropolitan Police Department said yesterday.

Lt. Quarles Harris Jr., 24, who had been cooperating with a federal investigators, was found late Thursday night slumped dead inside a car, in front of the Judah House Praise Baptist Church in Northeast, said Cmdr. Michael Anzallo, head of the department’s Criminal Investigations Division.”

Read more:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/apr/19/key-witness-in-passport-fraud-case-fatally-shot/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

John Durham criminal investigation to begin, Power to subpoena documents and witnesses impanel grand jury and file criminal charges, Brennan Clapper focus?

John Durham criminal investigation to begin, Power to subpoena documents and witnesses impanel grand jury and file criminal charges, Brennan Clapper focus?

“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell October 23, 2019

Mueller, as a matter of determined policy, omitted key steps which any honest investigator would undertake. He did not commission any forensic examination of the DNC servers. He did not interview Bill Binney. He did not interview Julian Assange. His failure to do any of those obvious things renders his report worthless.”…Craig Murray

“McCabe had a role in crafting the “insurance policy” in the event Mr. Trump was elected.  Expect to find Comey a part of that also.”…Attorney Sydney Powell

 

From Zero Hedge.

“The DOJ’s Russiagate Probe Just Turned Into A Criminal Investigation

What began as an administrative review by the Justice Department into the origins of Russiagate has “shifted” to a criminal inquiry, according to the New York Times, citing two people familiar with the matter.

The move will allow prosecutor John H Durham the power to subpoena documents and witnesses, to impanel a grand jury, and to file criminal chargesDurham’s progress has been closely monitored by Attorney General William Barr, who appointed the veteran investigator in May, tasking him with looking into FBI and CIA intelligence gathering operations surrounding the 2016 US election.

As the Daily Callers Chuck Ross notes, Barr said on April 10 that he believed “spying” had taken place against the Trump campaign, and that he doesn’t buy former FBI officials’ version of how the collusion investigation began.”

“Just over three weeks ago, the Times also reported that President Trump asked the Australian Prime Minister to help Barr uncover the origins of “Russiagate,” a move which Justice Department officials said “would be neither illegal nor untoward for Trump to ask.”

And according to NBC NewsDurham has set his sights on former CIA Director John Brennan and former national intelligence director James Clapper.”

Read more:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/doj-russiagate-probe-just-turned-criminal-investigation-nyt

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Biden quid pro quo ignored, Trump request for Ukraine investigation twisted by evil Democrats and media, Biden: “If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.”

Biden quid pro quo ignored, Trump request for Ukraine investigation twisted by evil Democrats and media, Biden: “If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.”

“I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.”…Joe Biden 2016

“Company In Which Joe Biden’s Son Is Director Prepares To Drill Shale Gas In East Ukraine”…Zero Hedge July 25, 2014

“Robert Mueller, like Andrew McCabe and the rest of the anti-Trump criminal conspirators, consider themselves above the law and on a divine mission to unseat Trump. Mueller’s conflicts of interest, starting with his relationship with James Comey, are well documented.”…Daniel John Sobieski, American Thinker Dec 19, 2017

 

Classic Democrat chicanery.

Do the foul deed and blame Republicans.

Masters of diversions.

So it is again.

Joe Biden, in his official capacity as Vice President of the US, made the following statement in 2016:

“I remember going over and convincing our team, others, to convince that we should be providing for loan guarantees. And I went over, I guess, the 12th, 13th time to Kiev. And I was supposed to announce that there was another billion-dollar loan guarantee. And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor. And they didn’t.”

“I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.”

Quid Pro Quo.

President Trump, in his official capacity as POTUS, made the following statement in his phone conversation with  President Zelenskyy of the Ukraine on July 25, 2019:

“There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son,. that Biden stopped the
prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so
whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great.
Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if
you ·can look into it … It sounds horrible to me.”

https://citizenwells.com/2019/09/25/trump-transcript-of-ukraine-phone-conversation-july-25-2019-with-president-zelenskyy-clarify-crowdstrike-and-joe-biden-alleged-prosecution-stop-of-his-son/

Trump is seeking the truth about what took place via an investigation involving the US Attorney General.

That is his job.

He is not requesting any action that is illegal.

You be the judge as to who should be prosecuted.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

James Comey not indicted why?, Obama appointed, Barr Attorney General February 14, 2019, Inspector General Horowitz referred for prosecution 2019, Who decided no?

James Comey not indicted why?, Obama appointed, Barr Attorney General February 14, 2019, Inspector General Horowitz referred for prosecution 2019, Who decided no?

“Robert Mueller, like Andrew McCabe and the rest of the anti-Trump criminal conspirators, consider themselves above the law and on a divine mission to unseat Trump. Mueller’s conflicts of interest, starting with his relationship with James Comey, are well documented.”…Daniel John Sobieski, American Thinker Dec 19, 2017

“Transcript suggests Obama White House pressured intelligence agencies to blame Russia.”…Attorney Ty Clevenger on released FBI docs

“McCabe had a role in crafting the “insurance policy” in the event Mr. Trump was elected.  Expect to find Comey a part of that also.”…Attorney Sydney Powell

 

James Comey was referred for prosecution by Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz this year.

Comey was appointed by Obama in 2013.

William Barr was confirmed as Attorney General February 14, 2019.

Who made the decision to not indict Comey?

Somebody(s) got some splainin to do!

From the Washington Times September 18, 2019.

“Justice Dept. IG referred James Comey for criminal prosecution

Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz said Wednesday that he referred former FBI Director James B. Comey for criminal prosecution this year after concluding he leaked sensitive materials to a friend.

And the Justice Department watchdog told Congress he would “assess” Republican allegations of inconsistent statements in Mr. Comey’s testimony before the Senate.

Mr. Horowitz’s disclosure that he made the criminal referral marks his first public statement about the criticism lodged against Mr. Comey in a report released last summer. He told lawmakers it is standard practice to make a criminal referral when wrongdoing is suspected.

“We are required by the [Inspector General] Act to send information that we’ve identified that could plausibly be criminal to the Department of Justice,” Mr. Horowitz said.

The Justice Department ultimately decided not to prosecute Mr. Comey despite the conclusion by Mr. Horowitz’s team that he improperly leaked information to the news media. The documents leaked by Mr. Comey were sensitive but not classified.”

Read more:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/sep/18/james-comey-referred-criminal-prosecution-justice-/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/