Butowsky v. Folkenflik NPR et al motion quotes attorney Sidney Powell in Flynn case, “FBI officials systematically tampered with records and hid
“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell October 23, 2019
Mueller, as a matter of determined policy, omitted key steps which any honest investigator would undertake. He did not commission any forensic examination of the DNC servers. He did not interview Bill Binney. He did not interview Julian Assange. His failure to do any of those obvious things renders his report worthless.”…Craig Murray
“Fox News news analyst Ellen Ratner relayed information from Wikileaks founder Julian Assange to Texas businessman Ed Butowsky regarding Seth Rich’s role in transferring emails to Wikileaks, according to an amended lawsuit that I filed this morning on behalf of Mr. Butowsky.”…Attorney Ty Clevenge
From Edward Butowsky v. David Folkenflik, et al filed October 28, 2019.
PLAINTIFF’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION TO COMPLY WITH
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
“A lot has happened in the short period since the Plaintiff filed his MOTION TO
COMPEL and the government filed the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL (Doc. No. 76) (hereinafter “FBI RESPONSE”). In a reply filed on October 24, 2019 in United States v. Michael T. Flynn,
Case No. 1:17-cr-00232-EGS (D.D.C.), attorney Sidney Powell laid out damning
evidence that high-ranking FBI officials systematically tampered with records and hid exculpatory evidence for the purpose of framing the defendant, retired General Mike Flynn. The reply itself is sealed, but Ms. Powell publicly posted a redacted version online, and the Plaintiff has attached a copy as Exhibit 1. The Plaintiff requests that the Court take judicial notice of that attachment or obtain a copy of the reply (and its exhibits) directly from the D.C. court.
As the Court is probably aware, the criminal charges against General Flynn are an integral part of the “Russia Collusion Hoax” outlined in the Plaintiff’s SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. See, e.g., Petr Svab, “Did Flynn Just Call Out Mueller on Under-the-Table Plea Deal?”, The Epoch Times, July 14, 2019 (https://www.theepochtimes.com/did-flynnjust-call-out-mueller-on-under-the-table-plea-deal_3001928.html). If the FBI is willing to conceal records and tamper with evidence in order to frame a highly-decorated former
military officer, all for the purpose of promoting and protecting a political hoax, then it should not be difficult to believe that the FBI would conceal records about Seth Rich in order to protect that same hoax.”