Category Archives: Attorneys

Arizona AG Mark Brnovich motion to file Amicus in Texas v Pennsylvania US Supreme Court Dec 9, “resolve this challenge quickly to give the Nation certainty”

Posted on December 10, 2020 | 7 comments

Arizona AG Mark Brnovich motion to file Amicus in Texas v Pennsylvania US Supreme Court Dec 9, “resolve this challenge quickly to give the Nation certainty”

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

 

From the Arizona AG Mark Brnovich

Motion to file Amicus in

STATE OF TEXAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN,
STATE OF WISCONSIN

“The State of Arizona and Mark Brnovich, Arizona Attorney General
(collectively, the “State of Arizona”) respectfully move for leave to file a brief as
amici curiae respecting the motions for leave to file a bill of complaint and for a
preliminary injunction in this case. See Sup. Ct. R. 37.2(a). If granted leave, the
State of Arizona’s brief will make two primary points.1

The State of Arizona will first argue that election integrity is of paramount
importance. “Every voter” in a federal election “has a right under the Constitution to have his [or her] vote fairly counted, without its being distorted by fraudulently cast votes.” Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211, 227 (1974). Given this paramount importance, the State of Arizona, through its Attorney General, vigilantly fights to ensure election integrity, including for the 2020 election. The Attorney General participated in eight different suits to defend from attack Arizona election laws that were enacted by its Legislature. Indeed, in just a few months, the State of Arizona and its Attorney General will appear before this Court in the critical case of Brnovich et al. v. Democratic National Committee et al., No. 19-1257, and urge the Court to adopt a construction of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act that not only follows the text of that statute but also recognizes that to ensure “fair and honest” elections marked by “order, rather than chaos,” “there must be a substantial regulation of elections.” Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 (1974) (emphasis added); see also Smiley v. Holm, 285 U.S. 355, 366 (1932) (“[E]xperience shows” those “necessary” regulations include not just voting “procedure[s]” but also “safeguards”
for the “prevention of fraud and corrupt practices.”).

The State will also argue that if this Court exercises jurisdiction over Texas’s
complaint, it is equally important that the Court act quickly to give the Nation
certainty.”

Read more:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163258/20201209171850333_TX%20v%20PA%20Motion%20for%20Leave%20FINAL.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

7 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Courts, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged ,

Trump Motion to Intervene Texas v Pennsylvania et al Dec 9, 2020, Attorney John Eastman, Bill of Complaint in Intervention against PA et al

Posted on December 9, 2020 | 2 comments

Trump Motion to Intervene Texas v Pennsylvania et al Dec 9, 2020, Attorney John Eastman, Bill of Complaint in Intervention against PA et al

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official

 

From the Donald Trump 

Motion to Intervene in

STATE OF TEXAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN,
STATE OF WISCONSIN

And

Bill of Complaint in Intervention

“Our Country is deeply divided in ways that it arguably has not been seen since the election of 1860.There is a high level of distrust between the opposing
sides, compounded by the fact that, in the election just held, election officials in key swing states, for apparently partisan advantage, failed to conduct their state
elections in compliance with state election law, in direct violation of the plenary power that Article II of the U.S. Constitution confers on the Legislatures of
the States. Indeed, a recent poll by the reputable Rasmussen polling firm indicates that 47% of all Americans (including 75% of Republicans and 30% of Democrats), believe that it is “likely” or “very likely” the election was stolen from the current incumbent President.1”

“In the 2020 election, under the guise of responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, election officials in several key states, sometimes on their own and sometimes in connection with court actions brought by partisan advocates, made a systematic effort to weaken measures to ensure fair and impartial elections by creating new rules for the conduct of the elections—rules that were never approved by the legislatures of the defendant states as required by Article II of the
United States Constitution. These new rules were aimed at weakening, ignoring, or overriding provisions of state law that are aimed at ensuring the integrity of the voting process.

As more particularly alleged in the Bill of Complaint filed by the State of Texas, for the first time in history, these officials flooded their States with millions of ballots sent through the mail, or placed in drop boxes, with little or no chain of custody and, at the same time, intentionally weakened or eliminated the
few existing security measures protecting the integrity of the vote—signature verification and witness requirements.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163234/20201209155327055_No.%2022O155%20Original%20Motion%20to%20Intervene.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

2 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Federal Court, fraud, Judges, Justice, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , , ,

Georgia election fraud evidence presented to SOS for verification? added to lawsuits, Matt Braynard Voter Integrity Project: more than enough to flip GA

Posted on December 6, 2020 | 10 comments

Georgia election fraud evidence presented to SOS for verification? added to lawsuits, Matt Braynard Voter Integrity Project: more than enough to flip GA

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit.”…Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit

 

“Voter Integrity Project Leader Matt Braynard to Submit Absentee Vote Findings to Georgia Case

Evidence of voter fraud gathered by Voter Integrity Project (VIP) will be submitted to the Georgia lawsuit and four other contested states. VIP was started by Matt Braynard, the former Data Chief and Strategist for Trump for President, after widespread distrust in absentee ballots arose following the 2020 election results.

Braynard has stated in multiple interviews that VIP findings are enough to flip states.

Friday, Braynard shared that his work would also appear in cases in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona. He stated that he will appear in person to discuss his Arizona-related findings during the Arizona hearing.

Braynard created VIP to conduct an independent investigation, putting off a scheduled family vacation immediately following Election Night.

Over the course of several weeks, VIP called absentee ballot voters in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Wisconsin. Team members relied on voter registration public records to ask individuals to verify that they’d requested and returned a ballot.”

“Braynard summarized some of his findings in a public video published last week. His research found that anywhere from 18 to 44 percent of those respondents listed as having requested absentee ballots reported not requesting the ballots. Additionally, his team found sizable numbers of respondents who reported having returned their ballots – though the state didn’t count them.

Braynard stated that they’d also discovered respondents who reported not voting, though they were listed as having voted. Further, their team learned that some individuals were reported as having voted in certain states – despite having moved.

Braynard mentioned that he has signed several declarations for cases across the country.”

Read more:

https://tennesseestar.com/2020/11/29/voter-integrity-project-leader-matt-braynard-to-submit-absentee-vote-findings-to-georgia-case/

In the following video Matt Braynard states that his evidence is to be presented to the Georgia Secretary of State for verification.

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

10 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, corruption, Courts, Crime, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged ,

Trump Wisconsin election challenge lawsuit filings raise questions, Wis. Stat. § 9.01 (2017–18): “these actions should be filed in the circuit court”, Why not filed there?

Posted on December 5, 2020 | 3 comments

Trump Wisconsin election challenge lawsuit filings raise questions, Wis. Stat. § 9.01 (2017–18): “these actions should be filed in the circuit court”, Why not filed there?

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question.   From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8

 

Citizen Wells has a good fundamental knowledge of how the court system works and interacts.

Over half of the state statutes have been read and they have a common thread of election challenge avenues and remedies.

When the Trump Wisconsin lawsuit was first filed with the Wisconsin Supreme Court there was some head scratching.

From The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel December 3, 2020.

“The state Supreme Court rejected a request Thursday by President Donald Trump to revoke the certification of his loss to Democrat Joe Biden.

The 4-3 decision left room for Trump to bring a new challenge to the election results and the president quickly did so. But the high court’s ruling provided a serious setback for him because even some of the dissenting justices signaled they do not support Trump’s call for throwing out hundreds of thousands of ballots.

Conservative Justice Brian Hagedorn and the court’s three liberals declined to take the case he filed directly with them because state law requires election challenges like his to be filed in circuit court.

“We do well as a judicial body to abide by time-tested judicial norms, even — and maybe especially — in high-profile cases,” he wrote. “Following the law governing challenges to election results is no threat to the rule of law.””

Read more:

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2020/12/03/wisconsin-supreme-court-rejects-trumps-election-lawsuit/3807385001/

From the WI Supreme Court ruling:

“All parties seem to agree that Wis. Stat. § 9.01 (2017–18)1
constitutes the “exclusive judicial remedy” applicable to this claim. § 9.01(11). After all, that is what the statute says. This section provides that these actions should be filed in the circuit court, and spells out detailed procedures
for ensuring their orderly and swift disposition. See § 9.01(6)–(8). Following this law is not disregarding our duty, as some of my colleagues suggest. It is following the law.”

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/2020AP1971-OA.pdf

 

The next filing was also confusing to observers and to U.S. District Judge Brett Ludwig.

From Boston.com December 5, 2020.

Judge calls Trump request in Wisconsin lawsuit ‘bizarre’

“I have a very, very hard time seeing how this is justiciable in the federal court,” Ludwig, a Trump appointee, said. “The request to remand this case to the Legislature almost strikes me as bizarre.”

““It’s a request for pretty remarkable declaratory relief,” said U.S. District Judge Brett Ludwig during a conference call to set deadlines and a hearing date. Ludwig, who said it was “an unusual case, obviously,” also cast doubt on whether a federal court should be considering it at all.

“I have a very, very hard time seeing how this is justiciable in the federal court,” Ludwig, a Trump appointee, said. “The request to remand this case to the Legislature almost strikes me as bizarre.”

The judge questioned why Trump wasn’t going directly to the Legislature if he wants lawmakers to get involved with naming electors.”

Read more:

https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2020/12/05/judge-calls-trump-request-in-wisconsin-lawsuit-bizarre

The core arguments of the Trump and other lawsuits relate to the election procedures not following state statutes.

Yet, the Trump legal staff is not following WI statutes which call for challenges to begin in the circuit courts.

Is there some legal caveat I am missing?

It appears to me that we are wasting valuable time.

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

3 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Circuit Court, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Court of Appeals, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , ,

Georgia lawsuit: Trump v Brad Raffensperger et al Dec 4, 2020, “significant systemic misconduct, fraud, and other irregularities”, “emergency temporary restraining order”

Posted on December 5, 2020 | 5 comments

Georgia lawsuit: Trump v Brad Raffensperger et al Dec 4, 2020, “significant systemic misconduct, fraud, and other irregularities”, “emergency temporary restraining order”

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit.”…Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit

 

From Trump v Brad Raffensperger,  et al 

Filed December 4, 2020 in the

Superior Court of Fulton County State of Georgia.

“In this case, Petitioners present to this Court substantial evidence that the November 3, 2020, Presidential Election in Georgia (the “Contested Election”) was not conducted in accordance with the Election Code and that the named Respondents deviated significantly and substantially from the Election Code.

Due to significant systemic misconduct, fraud, and other irregularities occurring during the election process, many thousands of illegal votes were cast, counted, and included in the tabulations from the Contested Election for the Office of the President of the United States, thereby creating substantial doubt regarding the results of that election.”

“The Election Code in O.C.G.A. § 21-2-522 provides the means for a candidate in a federal election to contest the results of said election based on:

1. Misconduct, fraud, or irregularity by any primary or election official or officials
sufficient to change or place in doubt the result;
2. When the defendant is ineligible for the nomination or office in dispute;
3. When illegal votes have been received or legal votes rejected at the polls
sufficient to change or place in doubt the result;
4. For any error in counting the votes or declaring the result of the primary or
election, if such error would change the results; or
5. For any other cause which shows that another was the person legally nominated, elected, or eligible to compete in a run-off primary or election.2

The results of an election may be set aside when a candidate has “clearly established a violation of election procedures and has demonstrated that the violation has placed the result of the election in doubt.” Martin v. Fulton Cty. Bd. of Registration & Elections, 307 Ga. 193-94, 835 S.E.2d 245, 248 (2019) (quoting Hunt v. Crawford, 270 GA 7, 10, 507 S.E.2d 723 (1998) (emphasis added).”

Read more:

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/verified-petition-to-contest-georgia-election.pdf

 

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

5 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, corruption, Crime, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , , , , ,

Arizona ballot sample followup: 2500 more to be sampled after 3 percent vote impact discovered, 100 sample found Trump affected 3%, AZ GOP lawsuit

Posted on December 3, 2020 | 3 comments

Arizona ballot sample followup: 2500 more to be sampled after 3 percent vote impact discovered, 100 sample found Trump affected 3%, AZ GOP lawsuit

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

 

From the AP.

“2,500 ballots to be inspected in suit by Arizona GOP chief

County election officials agreed Wednesday to expand their inspection of certain ballots in metro Phoenix that are being challenged in a Republican lawsuit that seeks to reverse Joe Biden’s victory in the state.

Arizona Republican Party Chairwoman Kelli Ward, who filed a lawsuit contesting the election results, is looking for irregularities among the nearly 28,000 ballots in Maricopa County that were duplicated by elections officials because voters’ earlier ballots were damaged or couldn’t be tabulated. She requested a broader examination of the ballots after a court-ordered inspection of 100 duplicated ballots on Tuesday found two instances in which votes cast for Trump were cancelled in the duplication process.

Before the judge could rule on Ward’s request at a court hearing, the county offered to review 2,500 additional duplicated ballots.”

“Ward’s lawyers say the inspection of 100 ballots found that one person’s vote for Trump was ultimately recorded as a Biden vote and that another person’s vote for Trump was cancelled when the reproduced ballot contained votes for both the Republican incumbent and a write-in candidate.”

Read more:

https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-lawsuits-arizona-elections-phoenix-b4b79038c51ece4078eb2f6bcd326a21

Real News from Citizen Wells not presented by “fraud expert” AP.

2 percent of the sample of 100 was flawed. That alone is disturbing and a game changer.

That is a 3 percent vote swing.

And apparently all you have to do in AZ to dismiss a Trump vote is scribble a write in candidate on the ballot.

Reported at Citizen Wells yesterday.

https://citizenwells.com/2020/12/02/arizona-breaking-election-news-2-of-sample-of-100-duplicate-ballots-lost-trump-vote-gop-chair-person-kelli-ward-video-1-switched-to-biden/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

3 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Education, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , ,

Arizona breaking election news: 2 % of sample of 100 duplicate ballots lost Trump vote, GOP chair person Kelli Ward video, 1 switched to Biden

Posted on December 2, 2020 | 10 comments

Arizona breaking election news: 2 % of sample of 100 duplicate ballots lost Trump vote, GOP chair person Kelli Ward video, 1 switched to Biden

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

 

From AZ Central.

“Judge grants request from Arizona GOP to review sampling of ballots as part of election lawsuit

A Maricopa County Superior Court judge has granted a request from the leader of the state Republican Party to inspect a sampling of Arizona ballots for irregularities to determine if any were improperly counted.

But Judge Randall Warner capped at 200 the number of ballots Arizona GOP Chair Kelli Ward and her team can examine, arguing the limited sample should be “enough to let us know if there’s a red flag” when he reviews the results at trial Thursday.

Warner issued the order from the bench after an hour-long preliminary hearing Monday that occurred as state officials were certifying the election. It was the first major proceeding in an election contest pursued by Ward, who’s attempting to overturn President-elect Joe Biden’s win in Arizona by having a judge void the results.

Her challenge,which could not formally be filed until after certification, relies on a state law that allows voters to dispute election results if they suspect misconduct by election officials, illegal votes or an inaccurate count. Without evidence, Ward’s lawsuit questions the signature verification process used to authenticate mail-in ballots, as well as the duplication process election officials use to count ballots that tabulation machines couldn’t read.”

Read more:

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/30/arizona-judge-grants-republican-request-review-ballots-ahead-trial/6467477002/

In the following video, GOP Chair person Kelli Ward explains about the sample and the results.

Out of a sample of 100 duplicate ballots, President Trump lost 2 votes:

One ballot changed from Trump to Biden.

The other dropped Trump’s vote.

Truly disturbing and in line with witness testimony.

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , ,

Rudy Giuliani appears before Michigan House Oversight Committee today 6:00 PM Dec 2, 2020 Watch live, Giuliani to present evidence of election fraud

Posted on December 2, 2020 | 3 comments

Rudy Giuliani appears before Michigan House Oversight Committee today 6:00 PM Dec 2, 2020 Watch live, Giuliani to present evidence of election fraud

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The comments made accusations of racism and threatened me and members of my family,”   “The Wayne County election had serious process flaws which deserve investigation. I continue to ask for information to assure Wayne County voters that these elections were conducted fairly and accurately. Despite repeated requests I have not received the requisite information and believe an additional 10 days of canvas by the State Board of canvassers will help provide the information necessary.”...Monica Palmer affidavit

 

From WXYZ News.

“Rudy Giuliani to appear in front of Michigan House Oversight Committee today

Rudy Giuliani, President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer and the man in charge of Trump’s fight to overturn election results in several states, will appear in front of the Michigan House Oversight Committee on Wednesday.

Committee Chair Rep. Matt Hall, a Republican from Marshall, announced Tuesday that he will appear in-person in front of the committee. Previously, Giuliani was invited to submit written testimony.

According to Hall, the point of having Giuliani there is to get answers and provide information regarding election security and transparency.

“We can go a long way to achieving this by going straight to the top. Mr. Giuliani believes there were many problems with how this election was conducted and has alleged that there was significant fraud in Michigan,” Hall said. “I am glad we were able to find time to make this work with the President’s legal team.”

The committee hearing will happen at 6 p.m. Wednesday.”

Read more:

https://www.wxyz.com/news/election-2020/rudy-giuliani-to-appear-in-front-of-michigan-house-oversight-committee-on-wednesday

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

3 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Education, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, News, press conference, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , ,

Amistad Project press conference December 1, 2020, 3 whistleblowers provide personal eyewitness accounts of potential election fraud, Evidence in AZ GA MI PA WI

Posted on December 1, 2020 | 4 comments

Amistad Project press conference December 1, 2020, 3 whistleblowers provide personal eyewitness accounts of potential election fraud, Evidence in AZ GA MI PA WI

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”…Edmund Burke

 

From the Amistad Project.

“Press Conference: Election Whistleblowers Come Forward

Reveal details of alleged fraud affecting hundreds of thousands of ballots

PA postal truck driver shipped estimated 144,000 to 288,000 completed ballots across three state lines in October

NEWS PROVIDED BY

Amistad Project 

A national constitutional litigation organization, The Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society, is hosting a national press conference today featuring three whistleblowers who will provide personal eyewitness accounts demonstrating significant potential election fraud, some of which affects hundreds of thousands of ballots. Their affidavits are being used as evidence in litigation to ensure election integrity and the upholding of election laws in key battleground states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.”

Read more:

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/press-conference-election-whistleblowers-come-forward-301182013.html

 

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

4 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , , ,

Donald Trump et al v Anthony S. Evers WI Governor et al Supreme Court of Wisconsin Dec 1, 2020, Absentee ballots no application or missing info or Indefinite Confinement status etc

Posted on December 1, 2020 | 4 comments

Donald Trump et al v Anthony S. Evers WI Governor et al Supreme Court of Wisconsin Dec 1, 2020, Absentee ballots no application or missing info or Indefinite Confinement status etc

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”…Edmund Burke

 

From Donald Trump et al v Anthony S. Evers WI Governor et al 

December 1, 2020

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

“ISSUES PRESENTED BY THE CONTROVERSY

1. Whether absentee ballots issued in-person to voters by municipal
clerks’ offices in Milwaukee County and Dane County without the required
written application, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 6.86(1)(ar), are illegal and
invalid.
2. Whether absentee ballots issued by municipal clerks’ offices in
Milwaukee County and Dane County without the required written
application, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 6.86(1)(ar), should be excluded from the
Presidential Election results in Wisconsin as required by Wis. Stat. § 6.84(2).
3. Whether absentee ballots accompanied by incomplete
certifications or on which municipal clerks added missing information in
contravention of Wis. Stat. §§ 6.84(2) and 6.87(6d) are illegal and invalid.
4. Whether absentee ballots accompanied by incomplete
certifications or on which municipal clerks added missing information in
contravention of Wis. Stat. §§ 6.84(2) and 6.87(6d) should be excluded from
the Presidential Election results in Wisconsin as required by Wis. Stat. §
6.84(2).
5. Whether absentee ballots cast by electors claiming Indefinite
Confinement status, which status was claimed on or after March 25, 2020,
for which there was no voter identification provided are illegal and invalid.          6. Whether absentee ballots cast by electors claiming Indefinite
Confinement status, which status was claimed on or after March 25, 2020,
for which there was no voter identification provided should be excluded from
the Presidential Election results in Wisconsin.
7. Whether stationing poll workers, receiving ballots, witnessing
ballot certifications and other clerk’s office activities in Madison’s
“Democracy in the Park” events complied with Wisconsin Election laws.
8. Whether relief by drawdown is appropriate for legal violations
committed at the “Democracy in the Park” events. ”

“While there was a pattern of activities improperly undertaken that
affected the Election, four stand out: (1) a total of at least 170,140 absentee
ballots were improperly counted as they were issued without the elector
having first submitted a written application as expressly required by Wis.
Stat. § 6.86(1)(ar); (2) no less than 5,517 absentee ballots were improperly
counted as the certifications were, when received by the clerks’ offices,
incomplete and, as to a substantial proportion, the clerks’ offices
subsequently altered the certifications by inserting missing information; (3)
28,395 absentee ballots were counted that were improperly cast by
individuals claiming Indefinite Confinement status even as there was
“reliable information that [the]… elector no longer qualifies for the service.”
Wis. Stat. 6.86(2); and (4) 17,271 absentee ballots were improperly cast or
received at “Democracy in the Park” events.”

Read more:

https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/wisconsin-filing-12-1-20_compressed.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

4 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Tagged , ,