Monthly Archives: December 2020

Arizona election integrity hearing Dec 11 11:00 ET watch live AZ Senate Judiciary Committee, Subpoena power, Legislators working to expose voter fraud

Arizona election integrity hearing Dec 11 11:00 ET watch live AZ Senate Judiciary Committee, Subpoena power, Legislators working to expose voter fraud

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

 

From the Geller Report.

“Arizona Senate Will Hold Official Legislative Hearing Into Election Fraud, Complete With Subpoena Power

Members of the Arizona Legislature are finally working to expose voter fraud within the state”

“The Arizona Senate will hold an official legislative hearing on election integrity complete with subpoena power on Friday morning, National File understands.

Arizona State Representative Mark Finchem made the announcement regarding the legislative hearing to be held in the Senate on Thursday morning.”

“This would mark a significant step in the election integrity process. A previous hearing, in which President Trump’s legal team participated, involved multiple witnesses and serious analysis of the election, but did not have the full powers that a legislative hearing could provide, most notably the power to subpoena, and the requirement for sworn testimony.

The hearing would likely have been called by Arizona Senate President Karen Fann. National File understands that only her and Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers have the power to do so in their respective chambers. Bowers had been subject to serious criticism, following comments that showed a poor understanding of the Constitution, along with a lack of committment to calling the hearing.

Finchem’s announcement follows repeated calls for a full legislative hearing from Dr Kelli Ward, the chairman of the Arizona GOP, who has been consistently doing so since last week. Ward had argued that a full legislative hearing with subpoena powers will not “interefere with any legal cases,” and should therefore happen as soon as possible.”

Read more:

https://gellerreport.com/2020/12/triumph-arizona-senate-will-hold-official-legislative-hearing-into-election-fraud-complete-with-subpoena-power.html/

https://youtu.be/lYhM5swmNk4

***  Update 1:00 ET not sure what is going on in Arizona. Here is another option  ***

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DncFQEAwosY&feature=emb_logo

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

 

Josh Stein NC AG joined other corrupt Democrat Attorney Generals opposing Texas, Potential conflict of interest, Stein “won” by 13k+, Sidney Powell stated voter fraud in North Carolina

Josh Stein NC AG joined other corrupt Democrat Attorney Generals opposing Texas, Potential conflict of interest, Stein “won” by 13k+, Sidney Powell stated voter fraud in North Carolina

“NC Attorney General Josh Stein, who “won” in 2020 by 13k+ votes and possible voter fraud, has added North Carolina to the opposing brief to Texas in the SCOTUS. Stein must be removed from office.”…Citizen Wells

“Sidney Powell in her Alpharetta GA speech, mentioned NC as having voter fraud.”...Keep America Free Rally

“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell

 

President Trump won North Carolina.

NC Attorney General Josh Stein “won” by 13k + votes.

Sidney Powell, in her Georgia rally mentioned NC, her native state, as having experienced voter fraud.

Josh Stein has a potential conflict of interest.

BTW,

Sidney Powell is from Durham County NC.

Durham county went 81 % for Stein.

It is also the most liberal county in NC and one of the most suspect for voter fraud.

Neighboring Wake County, location of Raleigh and the seat of NC government went 63 % for Stein.

Does Sidney Powell know something?

From the Amicus brief:

“The District of Columbia together with the States and territories of California,
Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Guam, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North
Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, U.S. Virgin Islands, and
Washington (collectively, the “Amici States”) move for leave to file the enclosed brief as amici curiae in support of defendants and in opposition to plaintiff’s leave to file a bill of complaint (i) without 10 days’ advance notice to the parties of amici’s intent to file as ordinarily required by Sup. Ct. R. 37.2(a), and (ii) in an unbound format on 8½-by-11-inch paper rather than in booklet form.”

“JOSHUA H. STEIN
Attorney General
State of North Carolina”

“ARGUMENT
I. The Electors Clause Provides No Basis To Second-Guess State Courts
And Local Actors In Their Interpretation Of State Law.
Texas and its amici, including Missouri and other states (“Missouri Amici”),
contend that by interpreting or implementing state law, state officials and state courts have “encroached upon the ‘plenary’ authority of [Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, and Wisconsin’s] respective legislatures over the conduct of the Presidential election,” thereby violating the Electors Clause. Missouri et al. Br. 5; see U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 2. That reading of the Electors Clause, however, would upend a century’s worth of this Court’s precedent; render unconstitutional routine and critical election administration; and supplant states’ sovereign power to structure their own systems of government. Indeed, by demanding this Court police state interpretation of state law, Texas’s theory of the Electors Clause would reorder the Constitution and undermine our federalist system.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163379/20201210144443769_Texas%20v.%20Pennsylvania%20-%20Motion%20and%20Br.%20of%20Amici%20DC%20et%20al.pdf

The “argument” above is one big Orwellian Lie!

And Josh Stein knows it.

Stein should be removed from office.

Potentially voter fraud got him “elected.”

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

YouTube Thought Police panicked Why? because Supreme Court filings loaded with “fraud”, “We also disallow content alleging widespread fraud “

YouTube Thought Police panicked Why? because Supreme Court filings loaded with “fraud”, “We also disallow content alleging widespread fraud ”

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

“”You’re a traitor!” yelled the boy. “You’re a thought criminal!””...George Orwell, “1984”

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

 

YouTube for years has presented a category of “Top News”.

And what do you find there? The kings of fake news CBS, CNN, MSNBC, etc.

They have been allowing smaller sites, with diverse opinions and reporting up until yesterday when they announced a new policy.

“Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline for the U.S. Presidential election and enough states have certified their election results to determine a President-elect. Given that, we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, in line with our approach towards historical U.S. Presidential elections.”

https://citizenwells.com/2020/12/09/youtube-aka-big-brother-lies-about-election-will-remove-videos-that-challenge-their-views-no-president-elect-until-jan-6-at-earliest-likely-biased-not-stupid/

First of all the first line is a huge Orwellian Lie!

There is no president elect until January 6 at the earliest.

The electors have not even voted yet!

But why yesterday did they invoke an Orwellian Thought Police edict directed at alleged fraud in the 2020 election.

They panicked!

They knew that US Supreme Court filings were coming and that they would be loaded with references to fraud.

From the highest court in the nation with the most credible legal documents and arguments.

They could not allow videos referencing that to discredit their fake news accomplices.

The Texas lawsuit has 6 references to “fraud.”

The 17 state Amicus brief has 89 references to “fraud.”!!!

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163215/20201209144840609_2020-12-09%20-%20Texas%20v.%20Pennsylvania%20-%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Missouri%20et%20al.%20-%20Final%20with%20Tables.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arizona AG Mark Brnovich motion to file Amicus in Texas v Pennsylvania US Supreme Court Dec 9, “resolve this challenge quickly to give the Nation certainty”

Arizona AG Mark Brnovich motion to file Amicus in Texas v Pennsylvania US Supreme Court Dec 9, “resolve this challenge quickly to give the Nation certainty”

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

 

From the Arizona AG Mark Brnovich

Motion to file Amicus in

STATE OF TEXAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN,
STATE OF WISCONSIN

“The State of Arizona and Mark Brnovich, Arizona Attorney General
(collectively, the “State of Arizona”) respectfully move for leave to file a brief as
amici curiae respecting the motions for leave to file a bill of complaint and for a
preliminary injunction in this case. See Sup. Ct. R. 37.2(a). If granted leave, the
State of Arizona’s brief will make two primary points.1

The State of Arizona will first argue that election integrity is of paramount
importance. “Every voter” in a federal election “has a right under the Constitution to have his [or her] vote fairly counted, without its being distorted by fraudulently cast votes.” Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211, 227 (1974). Given this paramount importance, the State of Arizona, through its Attorney General, vigilantly fights to ensure election integrity, including for the 2020 election. The Attorney General participated in eight different suits to defend from attack Arizona election laws that were enacted by its Legislature. Indeed, in just a few months, the State of Arizona and its Attorney General will appear before this Court in the critical case of Brnovich et al. v. Democratic National Committee et al., No. 19-1257, and urge the Court to adopt a construction of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act that not only follows the text of that statute but also recognizes that to ensure “fair and honest” elections marked by “order, rather than chaos,” “there must be a substantial regulation of elections.” Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 (1974) (emphasis added); see also Smiley v. Holm, 285 U.S. 355, 366 (1932) (“[E]xperience shows” those “necessary” regulations include not just voting “procedure[s]” but also “safeguards”
for the “prevention of fraud and corrupt practices.”).

The State will also argue that if this Court exercises jurisdiction over Texas’s
complaint, it is equally important that the Court act quickly to give the Nation
certainty.”

Read more:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163258/20201209171850333_TX%20v%20PA%20Motion%20for%20Leave%20FINAL.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Trump Motion to Intervene Texas v Pennsylvania et al Dec 9, 2020, Attorney John Eastman, Bill of Complaint in Intervention against PA et al

Trump Motion to Intervene Texas v Pennsylvania et al Dec 9, 2020, Attorney John Eastman, Bill of Complaint in Intervention against PA et al

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official

 

From the Donald Trump 

Motion to Intervene in

STATE OF TEXAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN,
STATE OF WISCONSIN

And

Bill of Complaint in Intervention

“Our Country is deeply divided in ways that it arguably has not been seen since the election of 1860.There is a high level of distrust between the opposing
sides, compounded by the fact that, in the election just held, election officials in key swing states, for apparently partisan advantage, failed to conduct their state
elections in compliance with state election law, in direct violation of the plenary power that Article II of the U.S. Constitution confers on the Legislatures of
the States. Indeed, a recent poll by the reputable Rasmussen polling firm indicates that 47% of all Americans (including 75% of Republicans and 30% of Democrats), believe that it is “likely” or “very likely” the election was stolen from the current incumbent President.1”

“In the 2020 election, under the guise of responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, election officials in several key states, sometimes on their own and sometimes in connection with court actions brought by partisan advocates, made a systematic effort to weaken measures to ensure fair and impartial elections by creating new rules for the conduct of the elections—rules that were never approved by the legislatures of the defendant states as required by Article II of the
United States Constitution. These new rules were aimed at weakening, ignoring, or overriding provisions of state law that are aimed at ensuring the integrity of the voting process.

As more particularly alleged in the Bill of Complaint filed by the State of Texas, for the first time in history, these officials flooded their States with millions of ballots sent through the mail, or placed in drop boxes, with little or no chain of custody and, at the same time, intentionally weakened or eliminated the
few existing security measures protecting the integrity of the vote—signature verification and witness requirements.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163234/20201209155327055_No.%2022O155%20Original%20Motion%20to%20Intervene.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

Coffee County Georgia cannot certify electronic recount, “To demand certification of patently inaccurate results neither serves the objective of the electoral system nor satisfies the legal obligation”

Coffee County Georgia cannot certify electronic recount, “To demand certification of patently inaccurate results neither serves the objective of the electoral system nor satisfies the legal obligation”

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

 

From WALB December 8, 2020.

” Georgia Secretary of State has recertified the election results, but Coffee County Board of Elections officials sent out a letter last week saying they could not certify its results following a second recount.

In the letter, election officials said they could not certify the electronic recount numbers given its “inability to repeatably duplicate creditable election results.”

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,” officials wrote in the letter. “To demand certification of patently inaccurate results neither serves the objective of the electoral system nor satisfies the legal obligation to certify the electronic recount.”

Along with the letter, Coffee County elections officials also sent Raffenserger’s office a document that “illuminates that the electronic recount lacks credibility.” Election officials also said that no election board has the ability to “reconcile the anomalies” that are shown in that document.

“Accordingly, the Coffee County Board of Elections and Registration have voted to certify the votes cast in the Election Night report,” the letter states. “The Election Night numbers are reflected in the official certification of results submitted by our office.””

Read more:

https://www.walb.com/2020/12/08/letter-coffee-co-cannot-certify-results-second-statewide-recount/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Youtube aka Big Brother lies about election & will remove videos that challenge their views, NO president elect until Jan 6 at earliest, Likely biased not stupid

Youtube aka Big Brother lies about election & will remove videos that challenge their views, NO president elect until Jan 6 at earliest, Likely biased not stupid

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

“”You’re a traitor!” yelled the boy. “You’re a thought criminal!””...George Orwell, “1984”

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

 

I am giving Youtube the benefit of the doubt.

They are probably not that stupid or illiterate.

Just extremely left and politically biased!

There is no President Elect and will not be until January 6 at the earliest!

It’s the Constitution stupid!

And

There is an enormous mountain of evidence that states violated their own constitutions, made numerous errors, allowed ballot fraud and used voting equipment like Dominion that has proven to be vulnerable and unreliable.

From the Youtube official blog December 9, 2020.

“Updates to our work supporting the integrity of the 2020 U.S. election.”

“Over the past weeks and months, we’ve seen people coming to YouTube to learn more about where and how to vote or learning more about a candidate or an issue. We’ve seen news organizations grow their audience. And we’ve seen people turn to YouTube for the latest election results or simply to follow an historic event with the highest voting turnout in over a century in the U.S.

Our main goal going into the election season was to make sure we’re connecting people with authoritative information, while also limiting the reach of misinformation and removing harmful content. The work here is ongoing and we wanted to provide an update.

Removing content that violates our policies

Our Community Guidelines prohibit spam, scams, or other manipulated media, coordinated influence operations, and any content that seeks to incite violence. Since September, we’ve terminated over 8000 channels and thousands of harmful and misleading elections-related videos for violating our existing policies. Over 77% of those removed videos were taken down before they had 100 views.

We also work to make sure that the line between what is removed and what is allowed is drawn in the right place. Our policies prohibit misleading viewers about where and how to vote. We also disallow content alleging widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of a historical U.S. Presidential election. However in some cases, that has meant allowing controversial views on the outcome or process of counting votes of a current election as election officials have worked to finalize counts.

Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline for the U.S. Presidential election and enough states have certified their election results to determine a President-elect. Given that, we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, in line with our approach towards historical U.S. Presidential elections. For example, we will remove videos claiming that a Presidential candidate won the election due to widespread software glitches or counting errors. We will begin enforcing this policy today, and will ramp up in the weeks to come. As always, news coverage and commentary on these issues can remain on our site if there’s sufficient education, documentary, scientific or artistic context.”

https://blog.youtube/news-and-events/supporting-the-2020-us-election/

From above:

“Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline for the U.S. Presidential election and enough states have certified their election results to determine a President-elect. Given that, we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election”

These people wouldn’t know integrity if it bit them on the ass!

I will be reviewing my use of Youtube and making recommendations to others to send a message and help demonetize Youtube.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

 

Georgia Senate Republicans Majority Statement on Elections Dec 8,  Public hearings through January 5, “all counties immediately preserve all data”

Georgia Senate Republicans Majority Statement on Elections Dec 8,  Public hearings through January 5, “all counties immediately preserve all data”

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official

 

From the Georgia Senate Republicans December 8, 2020.

“Majority Statement on Elections

The Georgia Senate Republicans have heard the calls of millions of Georgians who have raised deep and heartfelt concerns that state law has been violated and our elections process abused in our November 3, 2020 elections. We will fix this.

Our state constitution precludes us from calling a special session due to the lack of a three-fifths majority in both chambers. As constitutionalists, we must respect that. Even if we could secure the requisite numbers to convene, our laws provide no avenue for us to retroactively alter the results from November 3, 2020.  However, an avenue to move this matter even quicker than special session now exists and is pending before the United States Supreme Court.

As the upper chamber of the General Assembly and consistent with our prerogatives for legislative oversight:

  1. We are calling upon the elections officials to engage the GBI to investigate any and all fraudulent activities, including those which were brought to light during Senate committee hearings on December 3, 2020.
  2. We insist that all counties immediately preserve all data from the November 3, 2020 General Election in order to conduct a forensic audit. We also call on these counties to perform a signature audit. We call on the State Elections Board to oversee and monitor that closely.
  3. We will continue to conduct public hearings up to and through January 5, 2021 to ensure that fraud and misconduct do not taint the next election.
  4. We will fully fund the Secretary of State’s call to investigate out-of-state residents who attempt to move here for the sole purpose of voting in our run-off. We will make sure that these criminals are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
  5. We call upon the Secretary of State to immediately release a certified list of all voters in the November 3, 2020 General Election and a certified list of all newly registered voters in Georgia from October 5-December 7, 2020.
  6. As soon as we may constitutionally convene, we will pass legislation to reverse the detrimental effects of the consent decree which was entered into in March 2020.
  7. As soon as we may constitutionally convene, we will reform our election laws to secure our electoral process by eliminating at-will absentee voting. We will require photo identification for absentee voting for cause, and we will crack down on ballot harvesting by outlawing drop boxes.

Posterity and legitimacy of our Republic – guaranteed to us by our Constitution – require no less than our diligence, our time, and our utmost attention. Do not fall prey to the ploys of the Left, who would have you stay home and not exercise your right to vote on January 5, 2021. We cannot protect the Republic without you. Join the Senate Republican Caucus to ensure we get every possible legal vote cast in the run-off election. An overwhelming victory for our Senators and our Public Service Commissioner on January 5, 2021 will send a strong message!”

https://mailchi.mp/03a84530fbcc/for-immediate-release

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Texas v Pennsylvania et al US Supreme Court states must respond by 3 PM Dec 10, Allen West: LA AL AR FL KY MS SC SD likely to join, Sekulow explains

Texas v Pennsylvania et al US Supreme Court states must respond by 3 PM Dec 10, Allen West: LA AL AR FL KY MS SC SD likely to join, Sekulow explains

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official

 

From the US Supreme Court.

Dec 07 2020 Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint filed.
Motion for Leave to File a Bill of ComplaintCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
Dec 07 2020 Motion to expedite filed by plaintiff Texas.
Main Document
Dec 07 2020 Motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order or, alternatively, for stay and administrative stay filed by plaintiff Texas.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceOther
Dec 08 2020 Response to the motion for leave to file a bill of complaint and to the motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order or, alternatively, for stay and administrative stay requested, due Thursday, December 10, by 3 pm.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

From 

STATE OF TEXAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE OF
GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, AND STATE OF
WISCONSIN

“MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER OR,
ALTERNATIVELY, FOR STAY AND
ADMINISTRATIVE STAY”

“CONCLUSION
This Court should first administratively stay or
temporarily restrain the Defendant States from
voting in the electoral college until further order of
this Court and then issue a preliminary injunction or
stay against their doing so until the conclusion of this
case on the merits. Alternatively, the Court should
reach the merits, vacate the Defendant States’ elector
certifications from the unconstitutional 2020 election
results, and remand to the Defendant States’
legislatures pursuant to 3 U.S.C. § 2 to appoint
electors.
December 7, 2020 Respectfully submitted,
Ken Paxton*
Attorney General of Texas”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163052/20201208133328638_TX-v-State-MPI-2020-12-07%20FINAL.pdf

Attorney Jordan Sekulow explains.

 

Landry: Louisiana Is Joining Texas’ 2020 Election Lawsuit

“Millions of Louisiana citizens, and tens of millions of our fellow citizens in the country, have deep concerns regarding the conduct of the 2020 federal elections. Deeply rooted in these concerns is the fact that some states appear to have conducted their elections with a disregard to the U.S. Constitution. Furthermore, many Louisianans have become more frustrated as some in media and the political class try to sidestep legitimate issues for the sake of expediency.

Weeks ago, on behalf of the citizens of Louisiana, my office joined many other states in filing a legal brief with the United States Supreme Court urging the Justices to look into the conduct of the election in Pennsylvania where their state court ignored the U.S. Constitution in regard to the conduct of the election. The U.S. Constitution in Article 1, Section 4, states plainly: “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature …” The power for the conduct of federal elections is held by the State Legislatures in each state. In states like Pennsylvania, the judicial branch attempted to seize control of these duties and obligations and to set their own rules. These actions appear to be unconstitutional. If it is unconstitutional for Pennsylvania to take this action, it is similarly unconstitutional for other states to have done the same.

Only the U.S. Supreme Court can ultimately decide cases of real controversy among the states under our Constitution. That is why the Justices should hear and decide the case which we have joined representing the citizens of Louisiana.

Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court should consider the most recent Texas motion, which contains some of the same arguments.

Louisiana citizens are damaged if elections in other states were conducted outside the confines of the Constitution while we obeyed the rules.”

https://thehayride.com/2020/12/landry-louisiana-is-joining-texas-2020-election-lawsuit/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

Dominion Voting Systems documented fraud, Antrim County MI real time & post election tests, 22 machine results due tomorrow?, Ware County GA

Dominion Voting Systems documented fraud, Antrim County MI real time & post election tests, 22 machine results due tomorrow?, Ware County GA

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems

” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official

 

 

The following is a summary of major events leading up to, during and after the 2020 Election involving concerns and documented fraud tied to Dominion Voting Systems in multiple states.

As you read the following, Dominion executive Eric Coomer stated  the following shortly before the election:

“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”

That has to be taken seriously!

Pre Election.

Texas tested Dominion for the third time and reported their rejection in February 2019.

“Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, said they decided not to go with Dominion software for vote counting in the 2020 election, as they had recognized there were problems with it, and it couldn’t be trusted.”

“Texas Dominion Voting Systems testing and evaluations report dated February 15, 2019.

“Re: Inspection of the Dominion Voting Systems’ Democracy Suite 5.5 conducted on January 16 and 17, 2019″

https://citizenwells.com/2020/11/16/texas-dominion-voting-systems-testing-and-rejection-texas-attorney-general-ken-paxton-tested-three-times-system-failures-were-evident-in-both-software-and-hardware/

Georgia Democrat Senator Elena Parent 2019:

“Why on earth would we buy less-secure machines that are opposed by the voters, opposed by national security experts, at risk of being decertified right now in New York, are far more expensive than the hand-marked paper ballots, are possibly going to be decertified by the national election authorities within 2-4 years, when we’re spending, taking out a 20-year bond,” Parent said. “You start saying, ‘Why on earth would we buy these things?’

“I have been baffled, absolutely baffled. This is not a partisan issue — you don’t do voting machines on a party-line vote. This is crazy. And so I’m like, what is going on here? I’ve been given absolutely no good reason why we should buy these things. There’s not one good reason. So therefore, it just reeks of corruption — that we’re prioritizing vendors over voters.”

https://thebrunswicknews.com/news/local_news/contentious-voting-bill-passes-senate/article_13c51cc5-7a20-5512-9f6d-bf3a0d88348c.html

During the election real time.

Colonel Phil Waldron and his team of white hat techies were monitoring the election real time and collected data confirming the Dominion Voting Systems equipment was communicating with off shore sites and performing in such a way as to reveal data manipulation.

The following is his presentation in the Michigan hearing from December 1, 2020. He elaborates on what transpired in Antrim County and his revelations contradict the official narrative we were given.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ollhh9arnJ4

Post Election.

Ware County Georgia:

Robb Hurst, CPA 
@robbhurstCPA

Ware County, Ga has broken the Dominion algorithm: Using sequestered Dominion Equipment, Ware County ran a equal number of Trump votes and Biden votes through the Tabulator and the Tabulator reported a 26% lead for Biden.”

“ROBERT W. HURST, JR.CPA, BUSINESS OWNER

Robb graduated from the University of Georgia with both, his Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting, 1989, and Master of Taxation, 1990. He began his career in public accounting in 1991 at the national accounting firm KPMG Peat Marwick in Greenville, SC. In 1992, after the death of his dad’s partner, Robb and his wife Lorna journeyed home to Douglas, GA to work with Robert Hurst, Sr., until his retirement in 2004, at Hurst & Hurst CPAs, LLC.

Robb specializes in dealing with the accounting and tax problems of small businesses and their owners. He has extensive experience in the retail, restaurant, construction, healthcare and other professional industries. Other areas in which he exceeds the expertise of most is his in depth knowledge of accounting and auditing procedures and financial reporting requirements for government and nonprofits.”

Antrim County Michigan Dominion audit.

It is concerning that any test conducted now will be subject to scrubbing or altering of data and equipment.

“Sheriff asks judge to block Michigan order for clerks to delete election data”

https://www.mlive.com/politics/2020/12/sheriff-asks-judge-to-block-michigan-order-for-clerks-to-delete-election-data.html

“Michigan Attorney Gives Behind the Scenes Update on the IT Inspection of the Antrim County Dominion Machines

On November 16, several members of the MI State legislature sent a letter to Michigan’s Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson requesting that a full, independent audit of the accusations prior to the certification of the vote.  This was after reviewing hundreds of sworn affidavits by GOP and Independent poll challengers and evidence of vote switching by Dominion voting machines in Antrim County, Michigan. The radical Secretary of State, who has a problem with telling the truth, ignored their request.

On November 23, Matthew DePerno of DePerno Law Offices, LLC filed a lawsuit on behalf of Central Lake resident William Bailey, demanding Antrim County allow a forensic investigation of the Dominion voting machines after it was discovered that thousands of ballots cast for President Trump were counted as votes for Joe Biden.”

“At 5:30 PM on Friday, December 4, 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A. Elsenheimer granted permission to William Bailey and his team of IT experts to conduct a forensic study of the 16 Dominion voting machines, tabulators, thumb drives, related software, and the Clerk’s “master tabulator.” In his court order, Bailey was also granted the ability to conduct an independent investigation of the images they obtained in their examination. According to DePerno, it would take approximately 6 to 8 hours to obtain the forensic copies, and it made sense to do the work on the weekend when most government employees and residents would not be in the building.”

“Mr. DePerno expects to have the results of the study sometime tomorrow. He explained the forensic images of the thumb drives and the master computer would tell if machines were connected to the internet—and if they were, who were they communicating with? DePerno said the examination would be able to determine the algorithms used by the computer and will provide the number of ballots read through the machine compared to the actual number of paper ballots.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/breaking-exclusive-michigan-attorney-gives-behind-scenes-update-inspection-antrim-county-dominion-machines/

Citizen Wells has serious concerns about the current Antrim County audit due to the elapsed time after the election and the distrust of Dominion and election officials.

Thank God Colonel Waldron and his team monitored the election real time and did a follow up on site evaluation in Antrim County.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/