Barack Obama must prove eligibility or step down, Obama not eligible, December 18, 2008, Citizen Wells request to Obama, Greatest Generation sacrifices, Obama me generation, Patrick Fitzgerald investigations, Will Obama be indicted?

Why Barack Obama should be indicted

Part 7

One or more of the following events should happen:

  • Obama steps down.
  • Obama is forced to prove eligibility.
  • Obama is indicted and/or arrested.

If one of the above does not occur within a few months,
perhaps we should look to the Declaration of Independence
or Thomas Jefferson, for our next strategy.

Barack Obama

Prove you are eligible


Step down


I have the utmost respect for the “Greatest Generation.” This is
the generation that weathered the Great Depression, saved the
world in World War II and set a standard of self discipline and
sacrifice that is a model for generations to come. John McCain
comes from a long history of family sacrifice for country. He
serves as a bridge from the “Greatest Generation” to the baby
boomers and subsequent generations. Contrast these models of
self sacrifice and giving to others with Barack Obama and his
core support, the “me” generation. With Obama and much of his
support, it is all about me.

I read the obituaries each morning for two reasons. One to see
if anyone I know or a family member of theirs is listed. The other
reason is to read the short accounts of servicemen in World War II.
There were two side by side this morning that caught my attention.
One had been in the Marines in the South Pacific and the other was
in the Army Infantry and fought in the Battle of the Bulge. Those
two men, who at a young age were thrust into a hell on earth,
and along with others of their generation, made it possible for us
to have an election this year. We came closer to Nazi domination
than most people realize.

Fast forward over sixty years to the 2008 election year. We have a
candidate, Barack Obama, that has consistently only looked out for
himself at the expense of others. This includes community organizing
that was just a front for political agendas. Consider these quotes
from a report to Catholic Bishops:

“To be eligible to receive CHD funds, a program must be run by the poor, benefit the poor, and change social structures that harm the poor.” However, in light of the politically oriented thrust of ACORN’s activities, it is fair to ask whether the CHD subsidies to ACORN are advisable and commensurate with the purposes of CHD.”

“This commentary does not oppose CHD funding of genuine, grassroots community organizations, run and supported by individual members of a parish or diocese. There is potential value and virtue in the collective voice. However, when the CHD funds Alinsky-style, church-based community organizations as in the best interest of the poor and supports organizations which advance other agendas, it divests the poor of their right to an authentic voice. This process tends to treat the poor as exploited units of human capital, rather than as human beings created in the dignity of God’s image.”

What Acorn and Community Organizers are really about

Think Obama has been looking out for you?

Barack Obama has taken advantage of all that this country has to
offer including education. What has he given in return? A history
of posturing himself for the presidency and association with crime
and corruption to further his career. Obama appeals to people who
are just like him, classic takers, not givers. Obama promises free
college and tax breaks for almost everyone knowing full well he can
not come through with those promises and that they are not good for
the country. Why does he promise all those things? Because it is
all about getting elected. Me me me.

The soldiers returning from World II received college educations. They
paid for their educations with blood and guts and the greatest sacrifices.

Barack Obama, the Patrick Fitzgerald investigations are closing in
on you. You will be required to prove your eligibility to be
president sooner or later.


Barack Obama, for once in your life, do something for the people of this

Prove you are eligible to be president or step down.


33 responses to “Barack Obama must prove eligibility or step down, Obama not eligible, December 18, 2008, Citizen Wells request to Obama, Greatest Generation sacrifices, Obama me generation, Patrick Fitzgerald investigations, Will Obama be indicted?

  1. Great letter! This guy is in a lot of trouble . How many others are in on this fraud, at this point? They all can’t be starry eyed followers, too awestruck to see the truth, as it pertains to “THE ONE”. FBI, number One most wanted is what it is starting to look like. How will this play out? How many of these actors are employees of George Soros? Especially at the Secretary of State level.

  2. Time for a contact list of Senators and Reps who have limited political risk to stand up and object on Jan 8


    Elizabeth Dole (lost)
    Mel Martinez-retire 2010

    Reps?? (heavily R districts/retire)

    Please add-

  3. Pingback: US Election On Best Political Blogs » Blog Archive » Barack Obama must prove eligibility or step down, Obama not…

  4. January 20 is doomsday. Obama will never do the right thing and step down. Even if he wanted to, those who bought the presidency in his name would never let him. All of those we count on to keep America strong have let us down. Are there any options left to keep Obama out of the White House (are there any options left to prevent the downfall of America)?

  5. CW,
    Thank you for keeping us up to date. I’m at the point where I think we may have lost this battle. It amazes me, to say the least. It also sickens me.

    I’m afraid that BHO has so many corrupt people around him that some how, some way, he will produce a BC. Noty the real deal, but one that will pass the smell test.

    I read your blog everyday to stay informed. You and the other bloggers here always give me hope,
    but lately with all these events and he still just plugs away as nothing will touch him in this corruption sting … I have to wonder.

    Thanks again CW for all your news.

    I hope and pray that we all have a safe and Merry Christmas and of course ..
    A Happy New Year.

    God Bless

  6. stand up and fight

    Obama is taking a 10 day vacation to hawaii.Is this the only place he likes to visit?I think he is up to no good again.A group of people should have a vigil 24/7 around the place where his bc is vaulted.Have every entrance to that building watched.Armed with a video camera. The more people the better.This way they could each take turns with 2 hour watches Time is running out.

  7. The Omama smoking pictures hit the UK press today. Here is one of them. The first one I looked at (not the one I’ve linked because I could not find the one I wanted) made me scream “How gay is he?”

    Now there is nothing wrong with a gat man becoming President, but its just another aspect of his past life Obama has lied about consistently about. And throughout the campaign anyone who was paying attention knew he was lying. There is every reason why a habitual liar should not be president.

    On the upside, Obama’s first act as President will probably to give every gay man in the US a $100,000 handout to redecorate his apartment and update his wardrobe which will help get the economy moving and will not be as expensive as bailing out Wall Street

  8. January 8
    Congress meets to certify (or not) electoral college vote, thus electing (or rejecting) B.H. Obama as President.

    January 9
    Supreme Court to hear Berg v. Obama in conference.


  9. If Obama being protected from the Constitution,Then whos protecting the Constitution from him?


    Citizen Wells

    I started writing to my Congressman, and the more I wrote, the more I realized that the nation is heading straight into a Constitutional Train Wreck!

    I now disagree with MOST other commenters — I know now that both Obama and McCain have already FULLY DISCLOSED their ‘Citizenship Status,’ and the real problem is that everyone else has kept their ‘emotional blindfolds’ on, covering their faces with their hands over their eyes (while shrieking) perhaps even SCOTUS!

    Dick Cheney is the guy who needs to understand this, because he’s standing right in the middle of the tracks!

    Here’s what I came up with –


    The Great Train Wreck of January 8, 2009

    The train has already left the station, but a broken “bridge is down on the track ahead,” somewhere between December 15, 2008 and January 20, 2009 — and this will affect all Electors, all Senators and all Representatives from every State in the Nation.

    We can see far enough ahead now so the ‘gap in the line’ has caught the attention of the national media. It’s not complicated. What that means is that when a wider audience finally grasps what’s going on here, the political fallout is likely to be “NUCLEAR!”

    This is what happened: both major parties in every State have elected Electors, but both major parties have offered Presidential candidates who are NOT ELIGIBLE to serve.

    This has been done out in the open, and both Presidential campaigns have understood that their candidates may be NOT ELIGIBLE, and both campaigns have taken steps to notify the public that it may be possible their candidates are NOT ELIGIBLE to serve.

    But, this is what both campaigns failed to see: They are asking Electors, Senators, and Representatives from every State in the Nation to violate the Law.

    And that’s the broken bridge that’s down on the tracks ahead,’ between the Electoral College and Inauguration Day. It’s a bridge neither party or candidate can cross! So, the House of Representatives is likely have to elect our next President.

    * * * * * * * *

    What both major parties have now to explain is why they spent so much time and treasure (much of it in taxpayer dollars) to nominate and promote TWO candidates, neither of whom was ever eligible to serve!

    This will be the scene of the “train wreck:”

    On Tuesday, January 6, 2009 the 111th Congress will meet, and all Members will take their Oath to support and defend the Constitution and to faithfully discharge their duties. On Thursday, January 8, 2009, at 1:00 PM, a Joint Session is scheduled to count the Electoral College votes of the 2008 Presidential election.

    At that moment, the President of the Senate, Dick Cheney, and all Members of Congress will know that they are required under Article II of the Constitution to elect only a “natural born Citizen . . . to the Office of President.” And, that Citizen will be neither Senator John McCain nor Senator Barack Obama, because by Law neither is eligible and cannot serve, and both of them know it; and both have disclosed that fact to the public that there is this possibility, so they can not be criticized for not informing all parties.

    They will both be asked to withdraw their names from consideration. And, at that moment the political fallout is likely to be “NUCLEAR!”

    * * * * * * * *

    How did this happen? The Republican Party questioned the eligibility of Senator John McCain, and so asked Laurence Tribe of Harvard and former U. S. Solicitor General Theodore Olson to offer a legal opinion. They did – finding that Senator John McCain was indeed a “natural born Citizen, under legal precedent and historical practice.” They attempted to meet head on a 1964 Supreme Court decision that ‘natural born Citizen’ meant ‘born inside the United States.’ What they failed to address were the full ramifications of all Acts of Congress, so their analysis was challenged, and that disclosed the fact that Congress had already acted years ago (under its authority) to address McCain’s Citizenship Status. That contradicts the legal opinion of Tribe and Olson.

    It has always been known that the rights of citizenship of the ‘native Citizen’ and of the ‘naturalized Citizen’ are of the same dignity and are coextensive. The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only a ‘natural born Citizen’ (Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5) is eligible to be President; and you can’t be a ‘natural born Citizen’ if your Citizenship is achieved through Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 of the Constitution, the authority of Congress to establish an Uniform Rule of Naturalization, because you are then a ‘naturalized Citizen,’ and that is how McCain’s citizenship was achieved.

    To his credit, Senator John McCain knows that the opinion offered by Tribe and Olson has been challenged as falling short. However, it’s no longer consequential, because his Electoral votes have also fallen short. His major concern now is the audit by the Federal Election Commission (which will take about three years to complete), and whether the Commission will raise this issue, in order to recoup taxpayer matching funds.

    This is Senator Barack Obama’s obstacle: The 111th Congress will know that never in the history of the United States has a Citizen who has ‘Dual or Multiple Nationality’ on his or her ‘Date of Birth’ (subject to the laws of the United States) been considered by any Act of Congress, legal precedent or historical practice to be anything other than a ‘naturalized Citizen’ under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, regardless of where he or she was born. Why? Because ‘Dual or Multiple Nationality’ is addressed by an Act of Congress, and Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5, specifically excludes it.

    Most Senators and Representatives have received letters from constituents about the Citizenship Status of Senator Obama and have replied by saying they are willing to accept assurances from Senator Barack Obama that he was born in the State of Hawaii, in Honolulu. Most letters have discussed the files of the Office of Health Status Monitoring, because Senator Obama seems unwilling to open them to the public. It’s irrelevant!

    Why? Senator Obama has posted on his website, “Fight the Smears,” and this information has been confirmed by Senator Obama is the son of a British subject, one who (at the time) owed his allegiance to the Queen, and this status governed all of Obama Sr.s’ children. Senator Obama has disclosed that he was a ‘Dual National’ on the ‘Date of Birth,’ (the only day that counts). Therefore, under the laws of the United States, he is a ‘naturalized Citizen’ no different from Senator John McCain.

    * * * * * * * *

    One thing to observe: If, at any time or under any circumstance, your Citizenship Status needs to be “clarified,” you are NOT a ‘natural born Citizen.’ So, there’s no mention of ‘natural born Citizen’ in the Code of Federal Regulations, except in passing.

    Congress made the mistake once in 1790. Five years later, in 1795, they repealed the Act, realizing that to pass an Act regulating ‘natural born Citizen,’ they would need to amend the Constitution. And, they have not made this mistake again since! “Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship.”

    “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act ‘governed the status’ of Obama Sr.’s children.

    Let me repeat that last line again:

    “That same act ‘governed the status’ of Obama Sr.’s children . . .”

    British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies ‘at the time of the birth.’

    That is the FULL DISCLOSURE by the Obama Campaign that Great Britain ‘governed the status’ of Barack Obama at the time of his birth.

    That begs the question: Is he responsible for the fact that voters of his party nominated him for the Presidency of the United States, even though he has FULLY DISCLOSED his Citizenship Status — and many voters still want to check out his Birth Certificate?

    His party is willing apparently to ignore the FULL DISCLOSURE, believing perhaps that Congress can cure the disability. However, other members of the public have shown themselves to be unwilling to ignore the FULL DISCLOSURE, and so it is the subject of legal challenges currently before the Supreme Court of the United States.

    * * * * * * * *

    However, because Barack Obama achieved his Citizenship Status through Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, as understood by the Framers of the Constitution, his disqualification to serve as President of the United States is ‘incurable’ by the Congress, or the Courts.

    That word ‘incurable’ is an advance description of the train wreck!

    Never before has this come up during his career, because ‘naturalized Citizens’ legally are equal in almost all respects to natural born Citizens. The single distinction is the disqualification of ‘naturalized Citizens’ for the offices of President and Vice President.

    Is it unfair?

    It’s the Law.

    Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr., (Illinois) IS qualified for the office of President: Sen. Barack Obama, Jr. (Illinois) IS NOT!

    There are (in fact) FIVE obstacles standing in Senator Obama’s way:

    1. The ‘natural born Citizen’ clause applies to his ‘date of birth’ (so his Kenyan and Indonesian ‘Dual Citizenships’ and what he has done about them are noteworthy, but not really relevant;

    2. ‘Dual and Multiple Citizenship’ is addressed by the Code of Federal Regulations, subsequent to an Act of Congress, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended through 1994, and is our current law;

    3. The 14th Amendment clause “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” usually is understood to mean “subject to the laws” of the United States” (therefore, subject to the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended);

    4. Obama’s particular form of ‘Dual Citizenship’ (British) was specifically precluded by Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 (and therefore is ‘incurable’ by Congress or the Courts);

    5. The constitutional duty of the President is to take care that the laws of the United Stated be faithfully executed. That is not possible to do, if the President is already disqualified from entering upon his office.

    * * * * * * * *

    Here is some history about this: We need to go back to the 39th Congress, where Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, father of the 14th Amendment, commenting on March 9, 1866 on the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (42 U.S.C., Section 1982), said that the first sentence of the 1866 Act means:

    “Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents ‘not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty’ is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born Citizen.”

    Then, late 19th Century, the Supreme Court decided in United States v Wong Kim (169 U.S. 649 (1898)) (my summation) that on the basis of the 14th Amendment that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States is a ‘Citizen,’ but stopped short of declaring Kim a ‘natural born Citizen’ [because to do that would require still another amendment to the Constitution].

    Finally, we go all the way back to the Constitutional Convention, where according to James Madison’s notes, Mr. Gouverneur Morris of Pennsylvania said:

    “As to those philosophical gentlemen, those ‘Citizens of the World’ as they call themselves, He owned he did not wish to see any of them in our public Councils. He would not trust them. The men who can shake off their attachments to their own Country can never love any other.”

    Today, these words might be considered the words of a bigot!

    * * * * * * * *

    Now here is the Act of Congress: Justice Rehnquist (later Chief Justice) said the Constitution is “a political document noted for its brevity,” but it contains 11 instances addressing the ‘Citizen’ distinction: Art. 1, S 2, c 2; S 3, c 3, S 8, c 4; Art. 2, S 1, c 5, Art. 3, S 2, c 1; Art. 4, S 2, c 1, and in the 11th, 15th, 19th, 24th and 26th Amendments.

    The Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, gives Congress authority to establish an Uniform Rule of Naturalization, and as a result, the 82nd Congress passed The McCarran-Walter Act, that is called “The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952.”

    The 82nd Congress was controlled by a Democratic majority in both houses and that President Harry Truman vetoed the McCarran-Walter Act, but Congress overrode the veto and the Act became law.

    The Act was the product of the most extensive Congressional study in the nation’s history of the subject of Immigration and Nationality. It brought together and codified for the first time successive laws and decisions on immigration and naturalization.

    In the Act, Congress decided that the Secretary of State and the Attorney General were authorized, in their discretion and on a basis of reciprocity, to severally prescribe regulations implementing the Act. Those regulations are now codified in the Code of Federal Regulations.

    The Secretary of State codified her regulations concerning Citizens “born . . . in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” in the 7 Foreign Affairs Manual (Consular Affairs), in order to advise U.S. nationals about their Citizenship: 7 FAM 1100 deals with the Acquisition and Retention of U.S. Citizenship and Nationality; 7 FAM 1110 deals with Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship by Birth in the United States, including specifically ‘Dual or Multiple Nationality’ (7 FAM 1111.4).

    * * * * * * * *

    Before the “McCarran-Walter Act,” there was ‘common law:’ Under common law, as is clear from the comments made by Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, the phrase ‘natural born Citizen’ means “birth to parents who are Citizens,” and “subject to the laws of the United States.” The phrase was so understood by William Blackstone’s Commentaries, “Natural-born subjects are such as are born . . . within the allegiance of the king . . .”

    It should be obvious that the applicable phrase in first sentence of the 14th Amendment, “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” is a substitute for the phrase, “within the allegiance of the king,” in Blackstone’s Commentaries.

    That same word, “allegiance,” is used by Rep. John Bingham of Ohio when he says above that “every human being” born to parents “not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereign is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born Citizen.”

    The common law was displaced in full when the Secretary of State codified her regulations concerning ‘Dual or Multiple Nationality’ (7 FAM 1111.4), in fulfillment of the McCarran-Walter Act. Therefore, any Citizen whose Citizenship Status is subject to the Act is by Law a “naturalized Citizen,” and also disqualified for the Presidency.

    * * * * * * * *

    What can be done? All Electors can object. All Members of Congress can object. Then the House and Senate will withdraw to their respective Chambers to consider the merits of objections according the procedure set out under 3 U.S.C. Section 15.

    Before the list of the votes are entered on the Journals of the two Houses, the President of the Senate, Dick Cheney, will call for the objections, if any.

    “Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same will be received.”

    The Electoral College consists of 538 electors (one for each of 435 members of the House of Representatives and 100 Senators; and 3 for the District of Columbia.

    If, based on any objections, no presidential candidate wins a majority of electoral votes, the 12th Amendment to the Constitution provides for the presidential election shall be decided by the House of Representatives. I’m convinced that this will be the case!

    The House will select the President by majority vote, choosing from three candidates who received the greatest number of Electoral Votes. (However, remaining are only two candidates: Senator Joseph Biden (Delaware), and Governor Sarah Palin (Alaska)).

    The vote would be taken by State, with each State delegation having ONE VOTE. How many State delegations are Republican, and how many are Democrat?

    The House will vote for President, the Senate will vote for Vice President.

    So, it’s not impossible that Senator Joseph Biden (D, Delaware), or Governor Sarah Palin (R, Alaska), will be our next President of the United States, and the other will be our next Vice President of the United States.

    Please send this to 1000 friends or 1000 times to one enemy.

  11. Good Morning, Citizen Wells,

    I appreciate you much


    “Patrick Briley, who has a long history of interaction with Sen. James Inhofe, has formally asked Inhofe to make this objection. The only person in the entire U.S. House of Representatives who might undertake such an objection would be Congressman Ron Paul. I highly recommend everyone read Edwin’s column or listen to it in the audio section and then call Sen. Inhofe and Ron Paul’s district offices. Request they file a written objection to the vote by the electoral college delegates. “

  12. And what about the Russian War Ships parked at our front door??

    We must be looking pretty vulnerable to the neighbors with Obama not a citizen with the public divided and our treasury looted.

  13. I hated to be the one to bring it up – so I’m glad Ian Thorpe did.

    I was reading some of the Blago transcripts and Obama states his relationship to Rezko was that of ‘fond’ – we ‘saw each other’.

    I had to re-read that a couple of times…am I the only one who thinks that was an odd statement to make?

  14. Stock…

    Actually it will be the NEW congress voting on Obama as they start Jan. 3. So when everyone writes their letters make sure it goes to a congressman who didn’t lose.

  15. I strongly feel what Barry is hiding is his real LEGAL name. I feel this is why he was disbarred from practicing law. I think some one had the proof and for what ever reason turned it over to the Illinois BAR. It plainly ask if you have ever gone by any other name and he marked (no) This is why he has all parts of his life sealed!

    Remember from day one he started making enemies in Chicago.

  16. FORGOT……..

    Legal name for BHO is Barry Soetoro.


    Do not leave Americans with silence
    By Dr. Kate, an Exclusive for the TD Blog

    I offer my heartfelt thanks to Dr. Kate –
    I appreciate her so much — a wise woman, indeed.

  18. For those who are not exhausted enough from defending the Constitution from the issues of the presidential campaign, there’s this:

    Anybody else heard of it?

  19. Obama cannot Prove

    he is eligible to be President



    Please see my comment here:

    Also a good comment by NBC with the same idea:

  20. Olga you read just like Leo.

    You has did a nice job on your post.

    You say: “The vote would be taken by State, with each State delegation having ONE VOTE. How many State delegations are Republican, and how many are Democrat?”

    I say: Now isn’t THAT likely to cause frustration, with McCain taking more States than Opostor?

    And you say: “(However, remaining are only two candidates: Senator Joseph Biden (Delaware), and Governor Sarah Palin (Alaska)).”

    I say: But the eligibility of McCain is still in play. The Naval base in Panama was within American jurisdiction. So please to include McCain in the mix on the 8th of January. If your E.C. scenario comes true McCain could be chosen. The Senate gave him the okay to run… so?

    And you say: ” Senator Barack Obama [says] that he was born in the State of Hawaii… It’s irrelevant! Senator Obama has posted on his website, ‘Fight the Smears,’and this information has been confirmed by Senator Obama is the son of a British subject, one who (at the time) owed his allegiance to the Queen, and this status governed all of Obama Sr.s’ children. Senator Obama has disclosed that he was a ‘Dual National’ on the ‘Date of Birth,’ (the only day that counts).”

    I say: The basis of your argument, that Barry O should be precluded from the Presidency solely because of dual citizenship, doesn’t frame the case against him well enough. I do agree that that is cause. But I disagree with that being the sole reason for our considering his ineligibility. There is an obvious further Constitutional reason… that he is not even a Citizen at all.

    It’s almost as though you’re saying to the court in a multiple charge trial: “Your Honor, the fact that the accused kidnapped the girl after he beat up her boyfriend is irrelevant. It’s the first crime that counts.” Leo we are your allys in this. Unless you are able to substantively negate the charges of Obie’s being of foreign birth, please don’t be stepping on our feet with golf shoes.

  21. Jody // December 18, 2008 at 1:24 pm

    Remember those ships left for their trip to Venezuela long before Obama was elected. The Russians have stated though, that they will definitely be testing him regarding the missile defense system.

  22. OK, so when Obama visits his OBC (original birth certificate) in Hawaii within the next few days (probably Monday), what could he possibly do with it unless a detective is on the case to catch him?

    * It could be destroyed (oops).

    * An expert at Photoshop in Hawaii could:

    1. Change the name of the hospital to one in America (we could check on that though)

    2. Change the fact that his father WAS an American citizen (like maybe Frank Marshall Davis?) (“Oh my goodness, I had no idea”)

    But Barry, you forgot one thing. YOUR NAME WAS BARRY SOETORO for awhile, you idiot! You were an Indonesian citizen for a few years and never naturalized yourself back and even if you had, you still wouldn’t be a natural born citizen!

    So there is absolutely nothing he can do with that OBC that will make him a natural born citizen, but wouldn’t it be fun to catch him in the act of trying?

  23. The lastest on theobamafile site.

    Obama’s Legal Left Brain Trust

    Six months ago, Eric Holder, Obama’s Attorney General-designate, spoke at a convention of the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy (ACS), an organization that supports the “living Constitution” concept. Predicting an Obama victory in the November election, Holder told his audience that the U.S. would soon be “run by progressives.”

    “With this new administration that will be taking its place in January of 2009…we are going to be looking for people who share our values,” he elaborated. A “substantial number of those people” with their hands on the levers of power, added Holder, were likely to be ACS members. Indeed, Holder was himself a member of the ACS Board of Advisors.

    Holder’s comment was not merely designed to stroke the ego of ACS; it was a prophecy of things to come. According to a December 11th article in the New York Times, “observers expect that the Obama team will turn to [ACS] members to fill subcabinet positions and judgeships.” Already ACS members include Obama’s staff secretary, at least two members of the transition team, and Vice President Joe Biden’s chief of staff. Another member is believed to be in the running to become Solicitor General.

    That is good news for ACS but bad news for the country. ACS members are outspoken supporters of a kinder, gentler War on Terrorism; Constitutional rights for terrorists; open borders; redistribution of the wealth; radical environmentalism; and the most extreme acts of infanticide.

  24. Olga, I just don’t see it happening. The majority of the new Congress supports Barak. The ones that don’t won’t speak out b/c they are more conerned with their political survival. Will the SCOTUS buck the presumptive nominee? As much as I wish they did, I don’t see it.

  25. January 1st – Obama returns from Hawaii with a “birth certificate” (in quotes because it will not be the real one) that says his father was an American citizen, whether it was Barack Obama I or Frank Marshall Davis. Wanna bet?

    Then we would have to start all over again with lawsuits demanding to see his adoption papers to Soetoro which he would claim simply do not exist.

    Case closed. Natural Born Lying Citizen.
    THAT’S why we need a detective in Hawaii Dec 20 until Jan 1 to watch his every move.

  26. Question: How would things change if Obama returns from Hawaii with a birth certificate that states his father is Frank Marshall Davis (or any other dead American citizen) and he was born in the United States?

    First we would check with the hospital to be sure it’s true (so far none in Hawaii).
    Then we would have to get signed letters from the father’s family certifying the truth of that.

    Not gonna happen. I really can’t see ANY way out for Obama, can you? Is there really ANYTHING he can come up with that would make him qualified to be Prez?

    No … he will only get away with this fraud IF WE LET HIM. I just hope the SCOTUS does something on Jan. 9th, but I just don’t get the feeling they will. So …. what’s next?

    CitizenWells, what happens if the SCOTUS doesn’t do anything and Pat Fitzgerald doesn’t do anything either???

  27. Everyone dies and love dies. The Love of Barack Obama will die. Therefore love not obama? No. Love with false pretense grows insupportable life. Life as we know it must always die, in accordance with how it was Loved. Therefore Love him with all Thy heart!

  28. COPY—-Posted by guest | Permalink
    Monday, December 8, 2008 6:04 PM

    John Jay was responsible for this:

    It is thought the origin of the natural born citizen clause can be traced to a letter of July 25, 1787 from John Jay (who was born in New York) to George Washington (who was born in Virginia), presiding officer of the Constitutional Convention. John Jay wrote: “Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”[4] There was no debate, and this qualification for the office of the Presidency was introduced by the drafting Committee of Eleven, and then adopted without discussion by the Constitutional Convention.

    —-end copy–, post 100 at

    and what O thinks of S/C justices

    (Maybe they read this too, and are just itching to act…)

    Why McCain can’t be n/born as well

    –copy– snip–This essay concludes by exploring how changes in constitutional law implied by the Tribe-Olson Opinion, such as limiting the Insular Cases and expanding judicial review of immigration and nationality laws passed by Congress, could make Senator McCain a citizen at birth and thus a natural born citizen. —end-—copy–snip–

    In March, Laurence H. Tribe, a law professor at Harvard and an adviser to Senator Barack Obama, prepared a memorandum on these questions with Theodore B. Olson, a former solicitor general in the Bush administration. The memorandum concluded that Mr. McCain is a natural-born citizen based on the place of his birth, the citizenship of his parents and their service to the country.–snip- back in July 11, 2008
    the OSU atty had this eo say–“Daniel P. Tokaji, an election law expert at Ohio State University, agreed. “It is awfully unlikely that a federal court would say that an individual voter has standing,” he said. “It is questionable whether anyone would have standing to raise that claim. You’d have to think a federal court would look for every possible way to avoid deciding the issue.”–end– Maybe someone ought to see about (to add on) hiring some of the lawyers to work on this case as well – or if indeed, they know of anyone who can help. ?? NOO

  29. Wow, after reading all this, there is no way the Obama presidency lasts even one day. We’ve got every angle covered.

    Good work, fellow patriots.





  31. Pingback: Warrior Society Radio » Blog Archive » OBAMA INDICTMENT LINKS

  32. Pingback: Donald Trump investigates Obama criminal past, Obama birth certificate, Tony Rezko corruption ties | Citizen WElls

  33. Hey, how’s it going?

    I want to pass along some very important news that everyone needs to hear!

    In December of 2017, Donald Trump made history by recognizing Jerusalem as the captial of Israel. Why is this big news? Because by this the Jewish people of Israel are now able to press forward in bringing about the Third Temple prophesied in the Bible.

    The Jewish people deny Jesus as their Messiah and have stated that their Messiah has been identified and is waiting to be revealed. They say this man will rule the world under a one world religion called “spiritualism”.

    They even printed a coin to raise money for the Temple with Donald Trumps face on the front and with king Cyrus'(who built the second Temple) behind him. On the back of the coin is an image of the third Temple.

    The Bible says this false Messiah who seats himself in the Third Temple will be thee antichrist that will bring about the Great Tribulation, though the Jewish people believe he will bring about world peace. It will be a false peace for a period of time. You can watch interviews of Jewish Rabbi’s in Israel speaking of these things. They have their plans set in place. It is only years away!

    More importantly, the power that runs the world wants to put a RFID microchip in our body making us total slaves to them. This chip matches perfectly with the Mark of the Beast in the Bible, more specifically Revelation 13:16-18:

    He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

    Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is 666.

    Referring to the last days, this could only be speaking of a cashless society, which we have yet to see, but are heading towards. Otherwise, we could still buy or sell without the mark amongst others if physical money was still currency. RFID microchip implant technology will be the future of a one world cashless society containing digital currency. It will be implanted in the right-hand or the forehead, and we cannot buy or sell without it! We must grow strong in Jesus. AT ALL COSTS, DO NOT TAKE IT!

    Then a third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark on his forehead or on his hand, he himself shall also drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out full strength into the cup of His indignation. He shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever; and they have no rest day or night, who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name.” (Revelation 14:9-11).

    People have been saying the end is coming for many years, but we need two key things. One, the Third Temple, and two, the technology for a cashless society to fulfill the prophecy of the Mark of the Beast.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s