Wood v Raffensperger scheduled for SCOTUS conference Friday Feb 19 2021, Todd C Bank Amicus filed Feb 18, How will wood accusations against Roberts play out?
“Russell J. Ramsland, Jr., a cybersecurity expert from Texas, testified that his team had compared data from Dominion voting machines in those places where they were used around the nation…..Ramsland estimated that these anomalies translated to between 123,000 and 136,000 extra votes for Vice President Biden in Georgia.”…GA senate chairman Ligon report on testimony from Dec 3, 2020 hearing
“We are calling upon the elections officials to engage the GBI to investigate any and all fraudulent activities, including those which were brought to light during Senate committee hearings on December 3, 2020.”…Georgia Senate Republicans December 8, 2020
“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood
L. Lin Wood, Jr., Petitioner
Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State, et al.
Is scheduled for conference before the SCOTUS, US Supreme Court today, February 19, 2021.
Will Lin Wood’s accusations against Chief Justice Roberts have any impact?
Wood’s PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI can be viewed here:
From Lin Wood’s recent affidavit filed in US District Court:
“I have also received credible evidence of serious wrongdoing by high-ranking
government officials which I have brought to the attention of the public and to federal law enforcement officials. The evidence of wrongdoing includes evidence of potentially serious crimes perpetrated by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.”
“I have not received a retraction demand from Justice Roberts or his counsel and he has not made any claim to date that my posts are false and defamatory. Former Vice President Mike Pence or Rod Rosenstein have not sent retraction demands or claims that my posts of and concerning them are false and defamatory.”
From the Amicus brief filed by Todd C Bank February, 18, 2021.
THE FACT THAT A LARGE NUMBER OF PERSONS
WERE HARMED IN THE SAME MANNER AS WAS
PETITIONER DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACT THAT
THE HARM SUFFERED BY PETITIONER WAS PERSONAL”