Category Archives: Attorney General

Tagged 2021, ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting, Mark Brnovich AG of Arizona et al v DNC et al Oral arguments before SCOTUS March 2

6 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, corruption, Courts, Crime, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Windham NH Dominion Voting machines count off by 14 percent in one race, Governor Sununu downplays, Machines used in 85% of New Hampshire

Posted on February 26, 2021 | 2 comments

Windham NH Dominion Voting machines count off by 14 percent in one race, Governor Sununu downplays, Machines used in 85% of New Hampshire

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident: Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

From Granite Grok February 26, 2021.

“Many across America and as far away as Australia (go to 12:07), are aware of the “Windham Incident” – NH’s blatant disregard for election integrity.

The disturbing debacle was created by Gov. Sununu, his Attorney General and Secretary of State (SOS) due to their lack of a meaningful investigation into the disturbing and questionable results produced by Windham’s voting machines.”

“The Monitor dismissed the unexplained errors as insignificant and called the concerns “a conspiracy.”

The governor also emphasized that the discrepancy was small in size and tried to extinguish cries of a conspiracy.

It was the largest UNEXPLAINED ELECTION DISCREPANCY in the history of New Hampshire!

Not a conspiracy. An indisputable fact! We don’t know WHY there are voting count discrepancies nor WHERE they occurred. These concerns are shared by NH Senator Bob Giuda in these Op-Eds; “The Windham Incident – Election Results vs Recount Totals” and “The Windham Incident Deception“.

“The fact that we can get granular and focus on one or maybe two machines, or hand-counting 300 individual votes, I think that speaks to the immense integrity of our system,” Sununu said.

To be clear, it was not “300 individual votes” that are in question. The recount discovered errors totaling 1,363 votes from 10,006 ballots cast in the State Rep race. That does not reflect “immense integrity of our system.” Those errors were for only one race. We should recount the other races as well

“And the incredible accuracy. Through all of the different communities in the state, we’re talking about one or two machines in one community.”

No Governor. If it turns out the voting machines were the cause of defective election results in Windham – then we won’t be talking about “incredible accuracy” and just “one or two machines in one community.”

We’ll be talking about ALL OF THE MACHINES THAT ARE USED IN 85% OF NEW HAMPSHIRE!”

https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/2021/02/the-windham-incident-never-let-a-good-crisis-go-to-waste

Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.

More here:

Tagged Governor Sununu downplays, Machines used in 85% of New Hampshire, Windham NH Dominion Voting machines count off by 14 percent in one race

2 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Windham New Hampshire retains Dominion Voting machines for audit, AG office rescinds notice, “Windham Incident” causes public outcry

Posted on February 26, 2021 | 3 comments

Windham New Hampshire retains Dominion Voting machines for audit, AG office rescinds notice, “Windham Incident” causes public outcry

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident: Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

From GateWay Pundit February 26, 2021

“After Public Pressure New Hampshire AG’s Office Rescinds Plan to Move Voting Machines to State Capitol for Investigation”

“In the lead-up to the planned House vote this week, the AGs office, in a surprise move Monday, notified the town of Windham of their intent to take possession of the 4 voting machines, owned by the town and its citizens, even before the legislative process had been completed. The bill hasn’t passed and therefore is not even ready for signature by the Governor. Why is the AG suddenly so anxious to take possession of these machines? After the change in the scheduled vote and swift public outcry to this planned removal of the machines, the AGs office rescinded this notice yesterday.

As this audit is being done to reassure the citizens of Windham that their machines indeed operated properly on Nov. 3rd and that their votes were counted accurately, it is felt by most involved that this Windham audit should be done in front of its citizens, not in the distant State capital of Concord. It makes no sense to subject sensitive electronic machinery to needless transport in winter and then leave them unattended in Concord, rather than locked in a secure vault in the town, which has ownership of the devices. In following with this sentiment, town officials indicated they would likely refuse to unlock the vault and allow this apparent confiscation of their machines.

To those advocating for this long-delayed investigation, it is clear the AGs office has lost the trust of the people to whom it is accountable, the citizens of not just Windham, but New Hampshire. They have clearly demonstrated their office to be an unwilling participant in this audit process and disrespectful to the rights of the citizens. SB43 is currently scheduled to be heard in the House Election Law Committee on March 5 at 10:30 am. Concerned citizens of the State should contact Committee members to urge support for this bill.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/good-news-public-pressure-new-hampshire-ags-office-rescinds-plan-move-voting-machines-state-capitol-investigation/

More here:

Tagged AG office rescinds notice, “Windham Incident” causes public outcry, Windham New Hampshire retains Dominion Voting machines for audit

New Hampshire Dominion voting machines to be turned over to Democrat SOS Gardner?, Double conflict of interest, “Windham Incident” controversy

Posted on February 24, 2021 | 2 comments

New Hampshire Dominion voting machines to be turned over to Democrat SOS Gardner?, Double conflict of interest, “Windham Incident” controversy

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident: Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

New Hampshire Constitution

[Art.] 67. [Election of Secretary and Treasurer.] The Secretary and Treasurer shall be chosen by joint ballot of the Senators and Representatives assembled in one room.
June 2, 1784

https://www.nh.gov/glance/secretary.htm

From New Hampshire NPR December 2, 2020.

“Gardner Holds Onto Role As Nation’s Longest Serving Secretary of State

Wednesday marked another career milestone for New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner, who sailed without opposition into a 23rd term, upholding his position as the longest-serving Secretary of State in the nation.

The moment stood in sharp contrast to the start of Gardner’s most recent term, when he just barely fended off a challenge from former Democratic gubernatorial candidate Colin Van Ostern.”

https://www.nhpr.org/post/gardner-holds-role-nations-longest-serving-secretary-state#stream/0

The New Hampshire legislature elects the Secretary of State.

And now the Attorney General and Secretary of State’s office want the Dominion Voting machines that are the subject of controversy in the “Windham Incident.”

From Granite Grok February 24, 2021

“BREAKING! NH AG & SOS to “Take Possession” of the “Windham Incident” VOTING MACHINES!”

“Windham’s high level of mistrust and consternation is warranted. The AG’s office and SOS have been performing a Jedi Mind Trick for months. Now they are being FORCED to perform an audit – and they want control of the ballots and machines ahead of time. The optics of that is horrible. I’ve been told several Windham town officials are against relinquishing control as well – and I hope they stand strong.

The audit should be performed in Windham – and under Windham’s control – as suggested here. According to multiple attorney’s opinions… NH laws already allow a town’s Selectmen to perform the test – WITHOUT APPROVAL of the AG or SOS:

RSA 33-A Defines the ballots as municipal documents that are owned by the town, and;

RSA 656:40 Authorizes towns to purchase and own voting machines and;

RSA 656:42 VIII. (c) (11) Authorizes the moderator to perform pre-election certification testing of the voting machines, and;

Bal 602.01 (a) The city or town clerk is the custodian of the voting machines, and;

Bal 602.01 (c) Authorizes the selectmen to designate and define the duties of election officials to prepare and test the machines prior to an election…

So what’s the problem. Why is Windham being prevented by the AG and SOS from running their own test, on their own equipment, with their own ballots? What am I missing?”

https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/2021/02/breaking-nh-ag-sos-to-take-possession-of-the-windham-incident-voting-machines

So, what is this “Windham Incident” the “Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”?

“From the ever-vigilant folk at the Live Free or Die Report (on Facebook). They have a photo of a recount sheet for the Rockingham District 7 NH House Race in Windham. The original machine counted results were wrong for all 4 Republicans by almost exactly 300 votes.

Looking at the image, we see changes of 297, 299, 303, and 298.

That is very strange. That is a large number, large enough that a Republican who lost by 100 to 300 votes would not ask for a recount. Of course, no Republican asked for a recount. It was a Democrat looking for lost votes (24 of them) to perhaps flip one seat in that local election.

And look at what they found. Something, unexpected. Something we were not supposed to see?

St Laurent (d) lost 100 votes, and their Republican opponents all gained 300, plus or minus three votes.

It could be a machine error and unique to this town, but this is a troublesome event given speculation about fraud and Dominion machine counting hacks. And if it is an error what other errors occurred (see, at the top of the ticket).”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/10/windham-new-hampshire-recount-finds-dominion-voting-machines-shorted-republicans-all-4-republicans-lost-approx-300-votes-town-recount-coming/

Consider this:

52.7%

424,921

45.4%

365,654

Governor

CHRIS SUNUNU

65.2%

516,609

33.4%

264,639

See a problem?

New Hampshire, do not let the Democrat SOS get those machines!!!

More here:

Tagged "Windham Incident" controversy, Double conflict of interest, New Hampshire Dominion voting machines to be turned over to Democrat SOS Gardner?

2 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Democrats, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Lin Wood comments on Wood v Raffensperger before and after SCOTUS denial, Justices concerns, “Dissenting Opinion of Justice Clarence Thomas validates and confirms”

Posted on February 23, 2021 | 3 comments

Lin Wood comments on Wood v Raffensperger before and after SCOTUS denial, Justices concerns, “Dissenting Opinion of Justice Clarence Thomas validates and confirms”

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“I have also received credible evidence of serious wrongdoing by high-ranking
government officials which I have brought to the attention of the public and to federal law enforcement officials. The evidence of wrongdoing includes evidence of potentially serious crimes perpetrated by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.”...Attorney Lin Wood affidavit

“The oral testimonies of witnesses on December 3, 2020, and subsequently, the written testimonies submitted by many others, provide ample evidence that the 2020 Georgia General Election was so compromised by systemic irregularities and voter fraud that it should not be certified.”…Georgia Senate report December 17, 2020

February 19

“Many are watching and waiting on the U.S. Supreme today. In its conference, the Court will decide whether the cases from GA, Michigan, and Pennsylvania will proceed.

If the Court says NO, we will know the majority of the Court is corrupt. The cases are based on established, black letter law. The elections in those states were illegal and unconstitutional. They changed the election rules without approval of the state legislatures.

If the Court decides the cases will proceed, we will not know for sure if a majority of the Court is corrupt until final decisions are issued which could take months. Remember the decision in Obamacare?

Maybe the Court will allow the cases to proceed and buy time before the corrupt justices are exposed.

If the majority in the Court is not corrupt, a ruling should be issued today in Pennsylvania case. GA and Michigan should have cert granted with a reversal and remand to follow law in Pennsylvania case.

We are going to learn a great deal about the majority of our Supreme Court justices today whatever the rulings may be.

Keep praying that justice is done today.

God bless you. – Lin 🙏❤️🇺🇸”

“I have concerns about the following members of the U.S. Supreme Court:

Roberts (you know why)

Breyer (anti-Trumper)

Barrett (nomination and confirmation pushed by McConnell)

Kavanaugh (tied to Bush 43)

Sotomayor (attended what may have been fake Bribes inauguration proceeding & appointed by Obama)

Gorsuch (who knows – flip-flopper)

Kagan (nominated by Obama)

I have confidence in Alito (based on earlier PA injunction ruling)

I have confidence in Thomas (Patriot)

The Federalist Society has had TOO MUCH influence on recent SCOTUS nominations. That needs to change in the future.

The U.S. Supreme Court should never be guided by politics. The rule of law is nonpartisan.

Lin 🙏❤️🇺🇸”

“ALL of the Justices on the Supreme Court are flawed. Many are political. Some are corrupt.

God works through both believers and non-believers. His will shall be done on Earth as it is in Heaven.

The greatest Men of God in the Bible were flawed. Look at King David. But David was a man after God’s own heart. Moses was a lawgiver but he stuttered.

So whatever the decisions are today in SCOTUS, we know God controls this world which he created and the rulings will fit His plan. Remember – God’s plan is perfect.

Lin 🙏❤️🇺🇸”

“No word from SCOTUS yet on whether they will allow the election cases to proceed.

The cases were set for conference today and while I claim no firsthand knowledge of how the Court operates, I assume the Justices confer together in private.

Perhaps we will learn the decisions on Monday on whether the writs of certiorari will be granted. If so, the cases can proceed.

A grant of certiorari requires that a minimum of 4 Justices vote in favor of granting the review.

Hope that helps.”

“Thanks for sharing the notice below, Holly. My educated guess form this notice is that ORDERS granting or denying certiorari review will be issued Monday. OPINIONS in certain cases will be issued next Thursday.

SCOTUS has very little transparency in how it functions. In my opinion, ALL courts should be considerably more transparent. I believe public confidence in the judiciary would increase as transparency increases.

After all, We The People pay their salaries and let them wear fancy black robes to convey in part that Justices are important,

Are they that special and important? Yes and no. We need referees to honestly enforce the rules but the game belongs to the players, not the referees.

Judges and Justices are no better than any one of us. They are people too. We just let them be referees.

Maybe the answer is to establish courts that truly answer to We The People. Perhaps a network of “Courts of the People” where disagreements can quickly and fairly resolved without the expense and delay that results from lawyers being involved.

Then we could enact my “Modified Shakespearean” rule. We could get rid of 95% of the lawyers. Wow. Wouldn’t that make our country less litigious and more civil to each other?

Maybe its my advocacy for serious reforms in the legal profession that has the State Bar of Georgia up in arms against me?!?

Uh oh, fewer lawyers would reduce the Bar’s revenue from license fees. etc.

Lawyers Club of Atlanta would also have fewer members and could not serve as much free booze and fancy foods at its annual “Holiday” party . . .

Just sayin’ . . .

Lin 🙏❤️🇺🇸
www.fightback.law”

February 22

“I know many have been waiting on me to comment about the actions (or inaction) by the U.S. Supreme Court today in the 2020 election cases.

I will not mince words, We The People who seek honest elections conducted under the rule of law lost. The enemy won.

Having spoken that truth, the Dissenting Opinion of Justice Clarence Thomas validates and confirms that the lawsuits pursued by Sidney Powell and me were based on legitimate issues of law. All accusations and proceedings seeking to penalize or “discipline” Sidney and me should be terminated as we raised important issues in those case recognized by Justice Thomas. I agree with his Dissent. His rationale in the Pennsylvania is directly on point with my Georgia case and Sidney’s cases in Michigan and Wisconsin.

But this legal battle is not about Sidney and me. It is about you and your right to rely on the rule of law, especially on the bedrock principle that we must have honest and legal elections.

I remain very concerned about the breakdown of the rule of law in our country.

I will not quit. As I have done in the past, so I will continue to do in the future. I will continued to exercise my right of free speech and my right to take lawful actions in courts and/or administrative proceedings to recognize and re-establish the rule of law in America.

Thank you for your support. Stay strong. Keep hope alive.

Lin 🙏❤️🇺🇸
www.fightback.law”

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20489890/clarence-thomass-dissent.pdf

Everyone who feels beaten down, discouraged, and losing hope as a result of the majority of the U.S. Supreme Court ignoring black letter law and binding precedent today raise your right hand.

My right hand will not be raised.

Everyone who believes a lie will prevail over truth, raise your right hand.

My right hand will not be raised.

Everyone who believes that God is real and has a plan for your lives and the life of this country, raise both of your hands high in the air.

Both of my hands are raised high in the air.

I hope you stand with me and will continue to support my efforts to fight for TRUTH. I hope you will continue to fight for justice and righteousness within the bounds of the law. I pray that you will continue to trust God and know that ALL will be well.

Wait on the Lord. Until He acts pursuant to His plan, work each day, one day at a time, to help Him do His will on Earth as it is done in Heaven. God really loves it when you help Him, but remember He has ALL the power and can do it by Himself.

I had a good day. I hope you did too. Thanks for ALL you do to help me.

Lin 🙏❤️🇺🇸

www.FightBack.law

https://t.me/s/linwoodspeakstruth

More here:

Tagged "Dissenting Opinion of Justice Clarence Thomas validates and confirms", Justices concerns, Lin Wood comments on Wood v Raffensperger before and after SCOTUS denial

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, US Constitution, Voter fraud, voters

Arizona 2020 election update Feb 23, 2021 Senator Borrelli interview Paul Boyer close friends with Maricopa Board, Evidence on the machines still there?, Ward v Jackson denied

Posted on February 23, 2021 | 3 comments

Arizona 2020 election update Feb 23, 2021 Senator Borrelli interview Paul Boyer close friends with Maricopa Board, Evidence on the machines still there?, Ward v Jackson denied

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

“The Arizona Legislature should immediately march in to Maricopa County, secure the ballots, and with the aid of appropriate law enforcement, arrest anyone obstructing justice.”...Citizen Wells

The people of Arizona and some of the legislators really care about how the 2020 election was conducted.

It is the opinion of Citizen Wells that the legislature is long on talk and shorter on action.

The plenary power of the Arizona legislature is absolute and exceeds that of any court.

Arizona State Senator Sonny Borrelli interview

Three things stand out:

Concerns about evidence tampering.
Republican Senator Paul Boyer is good friends with the Maricopa Board of Supervisors and wants to protect them.
The senate is requesting a Grand Jury Investigation.

Arizona GOP chairman stated that the Dominion machines had been recalibrated.

Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson, et al. was denied by SCOTUS February 22, 2021

No. 20-809

Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson, et al.

from the Supreme Court of Arizona

Petition for a writ of certiorari denied.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Due process requires at a minimum the “orderly judicial review of any disputed matters that might arise” in an election. Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 110
(2000). In this case, the lower courts allowed only two full days of inspection and discovery into the validity of the presidential election in Arizona, in which threemillion, three hundred thirty-three thousand, eight hundred twenty-nine
(3,333,829) ballots were cast. The lower court held an “accelerated evidentiary
hearing” due to what it perceived as deadlines in the Electoral Count Act, “[i]n order to permit this matter to be heard and appealed (if necessary) to the Arizona Supreme Court before the Electoral College meets on December 14, 2020.” (Exhibit “A,” Judgment.) As the Court stated to undersigned counsel at the initial hearing Nov. 30th hearing: “You may be right on the law, that we’ve got more time than I think we have, but I’m reluctant to take that chance. And certainly if I set an evidentiary hearing after the 14th of December, I would expect someone to special action me to the Supreme Court and have the Supreme Court tell me, no, we have to do it sooner. But by then they don’t move as quickly as we do and we’ve lost a few days. And so my inclination is to set it on Thursday [December 3rd]….” (See Appendix “F,” transcript of initial Nov. 30th hearing, p. 14, lines 16-23.) As a result, even a very limited inspection of twenty-five hundred ballots that was granted by the Court (and/or stipulated to by the parties) simply could not be finished in time for trial, and Petitioner’s requests for larger inspections (as detailed below) were denied. ”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-809.html

Arizona Senate passed Senate Bill 1408

“The Arizona state Senate passed Senate Bill 1408 on a party-line 16-14 vote Thursday, giving the legislature the express authority to subpoena ballots, election equipment and information from counties. It also explicitly states that the legislature has the authority to investigate any matter.

The bill, sponsored by Sen. Warren Petersen, R-Gilbert, was passed in the event that a judge ruled that the law doesn’t give the legislature the authority to subpoena ballots and tabulation machines from Maricopa County so it can conduct an audit of the November 2020 election.”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/19/arizona-senate-passed-senate-bill-1408-subpoena-bill-feb-19-2021-legislature-has-the-authority-to-investigate-any-matter/

Az Canvassers are going door to door, documenting illegal voters. Listen to this canvasser’s story.

Arizona SOS Katie Hobbs and Gov Ducey celebrate as they prematurely certify the votes while the Nov 30 election hearing was taking place.

More here:

Tagged 2021 Senator Borrelli interview Paul Boyer close friends with Maricopa Board, Arizona 2020 election update Feb 23, Evidence on the machines still there?, Ward v Jackson denied

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Alito Gorsuch dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid SOS, Feb 22, 2021, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied, Amicus briefs accepted

Posted on February 22, 2021 | 1 comment

Alito Gorsuch dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid
SOS, Feb 22, 2021, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied, Amicus briefs accepted

“Between these alternatives there is no middle ground. The constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.”
“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.

So if a law be in opposition to the constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution; or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty.

If then the courts are to regard the constitution; and the constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature; the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.”
“The judicial power of the United States is extended to all cases arising under the constitution. Could it be the intention of those who gave this power, to say that, in using it, the constitution should not be looked into? That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises? This is too extravagant to be maintained.”
“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?”…Marbury V Madison

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

From the US Supreme Court in

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
20–542 v.
VERONICA DEGRAFFENREID, ACTING SECRETARY
OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.

Alito Gorsuch DISSENTING OPINION

“JUSTICE ALITO, with whom JUSTICE GORSUCH joins,
dissenting from the denial of certiorari.
I agree with JUSTICE THOMAS that we should grant re-
view in these cases. They present an important and recur-
ring constitutional question: whether the Elections or Elec-
tors Clauses of the United States Constitution, Art. I, §4,
cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2, are violated when a state court holds
that a state constitutional provision overrides a state stat-
ute governing the manner in which a federal election is to
be conducted. That question has divided the lower courts,*
and our review at this time would be greatly beneficial.
In the cases now before us, a statute enacted by the Penn-
sylvania Legislature unequivocally requires that mailed
ballots be received by 8 p.m. on election day. Pa. Stat. Ann.,
Tit. 25, §§3146.6(c), 3150.16(c) (Purdon 2020). Neverthe-
less, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, citing a provision of
the State Constitution mandating that elections “be free
and equal,” Art. I, §5, altered that deadline and ordered that mailed ballots be counted if received up to three days
after the election, Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boock-
var, ___ Pa. ___, ___–___, 238 A. 3d 345, 362, 371–372
(2020). Both the state Republican and Democratic parties
urged us to grant review and decide this question before the
2020 election. See Application for Stay in Republican Party
of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar, No. 20A54, pp. 2–3; Demo-
cratic Party of Pennsylvania Response to Application for
Stay in No. 20A54, pp. 8–9. But the Court, by an evenly
divided vote, refused to do so. Nos. 20A53 and 20A54, ante,
p. ___ (THOMAS, ALITO, GORSUCH, and KAVANAUGH, JJ.,
noting dissents). That unfortunate decision virtually en-
sured that this important question could not be decided be-
fore the election. See No. 20–542, ante, p. ___ (statement of
ALITO, J., joined by THOMAS and GORSUCH, JJ.).
Now, the election is over, and there is no reason for refus-
ing to decide the important question that these cases pose.
“The provisions of the Federal Constitution conferring on
state legislatures, not state courts, the authority to make
rules governing federal elections would be meaningless if a
state court could override the rules adopted by the legisla-
ture simply by claiming that a state constitutional provi-
sion gave the courts the authority to make whatever rules
it thought appropriate for the conduct of a fair election.”
Ante, at 3; see also Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing
Bd., 531 U. S. 70, 76 (2000) (per curiam). A decision in
these cases would not have any implications regarding the
2020 election. (Because Pennsylvania election officials
were ordered to separate mailed ballots received after the
statutory deadline, see Republican Party of Pa. v. Boockvar,
No. 20A84, ante, p. ___, we know that the State Supreme
Court’s decision had no effect on the outcome of any election
for federal office in Pennsylvania.) But a decision would
provide invaluable guidance for future elections.”

“For these reasons, the cases now before us are not moot.
There is a “reasonable expectation” that the parties will
face the same question in the future, see Wisconsin Right to
Life, Inc., 551 U. S., at 463, and that the question will evade
future pre-election review, just as it did in these cases.
These cases call out for review, and I respectfully dissent
from the Court’s decision to deny certiorari.”

https://www.scribd.com/document/495533990/Supreme-Court-Refuses-Trump-Taxes-Case-2020-Election-Cases-Response#from_embed

More here:

Tagged 2021, Alito Gorsuch dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid SOS, Amicus briefs accepted, Feb 22, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied

1 Comment

Posted in Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Marbury V Madison, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice

Justice Thomas dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid SOS, Feb 22, 2021, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied, Amicus briefs accepted

Posted on February 22, 2021 | 3 comments

Justice Thomas dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid
SOS, Feb 22, 2021, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied, Amicus briefs accepted

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

From the US Supreme Court in

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
20–542 v.
VERONICA DEGRAFFENREID, ACTING SECRETARY
OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.

Justice Thomas Dissenting Opinion

“The motions of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. for
leave to intervene as petitioner are dismissed as moot. The
motions of Thomas J. Randolph, et al. for leave to intervene
as respondents are dismissed as moot. The motion of Hon-
est Elections Project for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae
in No. 20–542 is granted. The motion of White House
Watch Fund, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in
No. 20–574 is granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari
are denied.
JUSTICE THOMAS, dissenting from the denial of certiorari.
The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority
to determine the “Manner” of federal elections. Art. I, §4,
cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2. Yet both before and after the 2020
election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it
upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we
received an unusually high number of petitions and emer-
gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions
here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legisla-
ture established an unambiguous deadline for receiving
mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day. Dissatisfied, the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots
received by the new deadline even if there was no evi-
dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed
by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to
have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any
federal election. But that may not be the case in the future.
These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address
just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec-
tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle.
The refusal to do so is inexplicable.”

“Because the judicial system is not well suited to address
these kinds of questions in the short time period available
immediately after an election, we ought to use available
cases outside that truncated context to address these ad-
mittedly important questions. Here, we have the oppor-tunity to do so almost two years before the next federal elec-
tion cycle. Our refusal to do so by hearing these cases is
befuddling. There is a clear split on an issue of such great
importance that both sides previously asked us to grant cer-
tiorari. And there is no dispute that the claim is sufficiently
meritorious to warrant review. By voting to grant emer-
gency relief in October, four Justices made clear that they
think petitioners are likely to prevail. Despite pressing for
review in October, respondents now ask us not to grant cer-
tiorari because they think the cases are moot. That argu-
ment fails.
The issue presented is capable of repetition, yet evades
review. This exception to mootness, which the Court rou-
tinely invokes in election cases, “applies where (1) the chal-
lenged action is in its duration too short to be fully litigated
prior to cessation or expiration, and (2) there is a reasonable
expectation that the same complaining party will be subject
to the same action again.” Davis v. Federal Election
Comm’n, 554 U. S. 724, 735 (2008) (internal quotation
marks omitted) (resolving a dispute from the 2006 election);
see also Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U. S. 780, 784, and
n. 3 (1983) (resolving a dispute from the 1980 election).
Here, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its decision
about six weeks before the election, leaving little time for
review in this Court. And there is a reasonable expectation
that these petitioners—the State Republican Party and leg-
islators—will again confront nonlegislative officials alter-
ing election rules. In fact, various petitions claim that no
fewer than four other decisions of the Pennsylvania Su-
preme Court implicate the same issue.3 Future cases will
arise as lower state courts apply those precedents to justify
intervening in elections and changing the rules.

One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to set-
tle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear
rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future
elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath
a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite
further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fel-
low citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respect-
fully dissent.”

https://www.scribd.com/document/495533990/Supreme-Court-Refuses-Trump-Taxes-Case-2020-Election-Cases-Response#from_embed

More here:

Tagged 2021, Amicus briefs accepted, Feb 22, Justice Thomas dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid SOS, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied

Posted in Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, constitution, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Marbury V Madison, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice

Maricopa Board of Supervisors cited in toxic environment leading to Treasurer Royce Flora resigning, “I intend to participate in the recall”, Ballots secured per law?

Posted on February 18, 2021 | 11 comments

Maricopa Board of Supervisors cited in toxic environment leading to Treasurer Royce Flora resigning, “I intend to participate in the recall”, Ballots secured per law?

“The resolution, introduced by Senate President Karen Fann, R-Prescott, states that all five of Maricopa County’s board of supervisors are in contempt of the Arizona Senate for refusing to turn over access to election equipment and ballots that the Senate demanded for an audit. It also directs Fann to take “all legal action” to enforce the subpoena.”…Arizona Senate

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“The Arizona Legislature should immediately march in to Maricopa County, secure the ballots, and with the aid of appropriate law enforcement, arrest anyone obstructing justice.”...Citizen Wells

*** Update below ***

The following has been very much under reported.

From the Arizona Daily Independent.

“Maricopa County Treasurer Flora Resigns In “Disgust” With Board Of Supervisors

Outgoing Maricopa County Treasurer Royce Flora announced on Wednesday his resignation from his post on December 31, citing “disgust” with the Board of Supervisors. In his resignation, Flora also announced his intention to assist with the recall of Supervisors Clint Hickman, Bill Gates, Jack Sellers, and Steve Gallardo.

“It has also come to my attention that the incoming Treasurer cannot be legally sworn in until January 11, 2021 and therefore according to the Arizona Constitution, my term would extend until that time,” wrote Flora. “This is unacceptable to me for several reasons. First, the liability bond protecting me expires December 31st, 2020 and I would become personably liable for any loss. Second, the political environment at the County has become so toxic I have no desire to endure further abuse. Finally, I intend to participate in the recall of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors which puts me in direct conflict with County government. For these and other reasons, I resign my office of Maricopa County Treasurer effective on the statutorily prescribed date of midnight, December 31st, 2020.”

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors have fought charges of a “rigged election” this year by blocking access to election data. Those allegations have resulted in a demand for a full audit of the Maricopa County General Election results.

Also, Arizona Senate President Karen Fann and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Eddie Farnsworth issued legislative subpoenas for county records, documents, and software related to the 2020 General Election. Farnsworth and Fann want the county’s voter registration records, ballots, and all equipment used during the election, including tabulator machines, computers, and memory cards as earlier reported by the ADI.”

https://arizonadailyindependent.com/2020/12/30/maricopa-county-treasurer-flora-resigns-in-disgust-with-board-of-supervisors/

Have the ballots been secured as required by state law?

Az Update Rep. Finchem to ask Attorney General to file Criminal Charges against Board Of Supervisors

Arizona SOS Katie Hobbs and Gov Ducey celebrate as they prematurely certify the votes while the Nov 30 election hearing was taking place.

More here:

Tagged "I intend to participate in the recall", Ballots secured per law?, Maricopa Board of Supervisors cited in toxic environment leading to Treasurer Royce Flora resigning

11 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Attorney General, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, constitution, corruption, Courts, Crime, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Georgia election fraud cases referred by Raffensperger for prosecution, 35 cases of election law violations, Tip of iceberg, Adjudicated ballots must be scrutinized

Posted on February 16, 2021 | 6 comments

Georgia election fraud cases referred by Raffensperger for prosecution, 35 cases of election law violations, Tip of iceberg, Adjudicated ballots must be scrutinized

“Russell J. Ramsland, Jr., a cybersecurity expert from Texas, testified that his team had compared data from Dominion voting machines in those places where they were used around the nation…..Ramsland estimated that these anomalies translated to between 123,000 and 136,000 extra votes for Vice President Biden in Georgia.”…GA senate chairman Ligon report on testimony from Dec 3, 2020 hearing

“We are calling upon the elections officials to engage the GBI to investigate any and all fraudulent activities, including those which were brought to light during Senate committee hearings on December 3, 2020.”…Georgia Senate Republicans December 8, 2020

“Why did Brad Raffensperger hire “never Trumper” Gabriel Sterling?”...Citizen Wells

From WSB TV Atlanta.

“Secretary of State refers 35 cases of election law violations for criminal prosecution

The Georgia state Elections Board announced during a meeting Wednesday that they have referred 35 cases of election law violations to the attorney general or district attorneys for criminal prosecution.”

“Raffensperger said the election board will now spend the rest of this month trying to work through those cases from past elections, and then get to more cases dealing with the 2020 election.”

“One of those involves U.S. Sen. Raphael Warnock, a former board chair of voting rights group New Georgia Project. The board, with the exception of David Worley, who recused himself from the vote, sent a 2019 voter registration drive case to the Attorney General alleging the group violated state rule by delivering roughly 1,200 new voter registrations to the Gwinnett Elections Board after a mandated 10-day window.

The incident cause voters to be disenfranchised in the March 19, 2019 special election.

There is no concrete timetable for when the board will look at the cases.

Other noteworthy cases, according to the news release, are as follows:

Samunta Shomine Pittman, who allegedly submitted 70 false voter registration applications while canvassing for the Coalition for the People’s Agenda.
Floyd Jones, who was the director of the Fayette County Board of Elections and Voter rRegistration but has since resigned, for his alleged improper handling of four memory cards registering 2,760 votes in the general election.
Joseph Lee Blackmon, who allegedly registered to vote while serving a felony sentence.
Hassan Dawud Musaddiq, Michael M. Ware and Brian Keith Pritchard, for allegedly voting while serving a felony.
Talibah Fagueera Fatimah, Bint Abdul Hamid Bratton and Sharmaine Swift, for allegedly submitting a false voter registration application
Sophia Sharpe for allegedly voting in another person’s name.
Albert Niks, Hurlstone Hendy, and Sean Watson, for allegedly voting noncitizens.
Clifton Seymour Salmon, for allegedly registering to vote as a noncitizen.”

https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/atlanta/secretary-state-refers-35-cases-election-law-violations-criminal-prosecution/5EJ3PYEPWJGQ7D23AYEOVBXC2Y/

From Citizen Wells January 12, 2021.

“93.69 PERCENT ADJUDICATION LEVEL

During the Georgia Senate election hearing on December 30, 2020, it was revealed 106,000 out of 113,130 ballots had to be adjudicated. 93.69 percent. This happened on election night.”

“96.45 PERCENT ADJUDICATION LEVEL

Now we learn that on November 5, 2020, 132,272 out of 137,134 ballots scanned had to be adjudicated.

That is 96.45 %!!!

Furthermore:

In one county.

In 2 batches.

A total of 238,272!

CONCLUSIONS

Virtually impossible these were all normal voter mistakes.

Were the ballots misprinted? An honest mistake.
Were the ballots misprinted to force adjudication?
Were new ballots created in the process?
If the old ballots were retained, how were they processed in a recount.
Supposedly 132,272 ballots were adjudicated the night before the morning of November 5.

GA election official Richard Barron stated the following on election night:

“THE ONLY BALLOTS THAT ARE ADJUDICATED ARE IF WE HAVE A BALLOT IN WHICH THERE IS SOME QUESTION AS TO HOW THE COMPUTER READS IT. SO THE VOTE REVIEW PANEL THEN DETERMINES VOTER INTENT.”

MAJOR RED FLAG!!!”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/01/12/raffensperger-georgia-election-corrupton-irregularities-part-1-nov-5-96-45-percent-of-137k-scanned-ballots-adjudicated-printing-errors-or-fake-ballots/

More here: