Mystery missile, Second missile?, eyewitness account, Video shows helicopter, Next day missile?
Greg Goss, a long time commenter, has come forward as a witness to a possible second missile being fired the next day after the mystery missile was caught on video. Greg also provided a link to the clearest video of the first missile firing. This video reveals a helicopter.
“I happened to be San Diego when all this happened. This is the best video of the missile. Notice at about 10 sec in you clearly see a Marine helicopter enter the screen from the right. This give perfect perspective for the direction of the contrail. UP
“Then at approximately the same time on the following day I witnessed a second missile. I saw the second ICBM while driving down I15. The sky was clear and from the southern sky I saw what was not a plane. It was heading due north and as it was directly over San Diego it took an 80 degree turn to the west to a heading of approximately 170 degrees. (West, North West) Ascending as it traveled faster than any aircraft I have ever seen. At the same time was a women on the radio trying to describe what I was witnessing. If it maintained it’s current trajectory it was heading directly toward Moscow.
Where did it go? Why were no jets scrambled from base that this thing flew over? Why not one news account except a near by traffic copter that happened to see the first missile? Why was there not one commercial aircraft to be seen anywhere? If I wasn’t out here I would never believe any of this. And coincidentally the entire executive branch is out of the country….hmmm”
A further email query from Greg yielded this response.
“The second “object” that I saw I could not determine it to be a plane as I saw no wings. All I could see was that it was cone shaped, like a missile. The contrail was unusually large and only a single trail unlike a plane that would have two or four trails that would merge into one. It was moving extremely fast. It went from a position over San Diego to a position over what I would estimate to be Los Angeles in a matter of about one to one and half minutes and ascending. I did not have a camera with me.
I was listening to KOGO talk radio and after this thing was out of my view I heard a women call in, as they were talking about the missile from the day before, and she described what I saw, although not as well but I sure knew what she was talking about. When I got back to the hotel I called up a map of the area. It would appear to me judging by the trajectory I witnessed that this missile was launched off the western coast of Mexico and hugged the coast line probably leaving the coast line around Santa Barbara. I saw no reports of the this second event anywhere. I also checked flight paths of commercial aircraft and I found no route that this object traveled.”
Thanks to Greg Goss for this report.
I noticed some more Youtube videos referring to a possible second missile. I will leave it to the reader to draw their own conclusions. I have upped this in importance due to the response or lack thereof we got from the US Government and the times that we live in.
Missile controversy, Los Angeles coast, Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D. commentary, National security threatened by Obama
From Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D., November 18, 2010.
“SENTINEL INTELLIGENCE SERVICES, LLC
LYLE J. RAPACKI, Ph.D.
____________
CONSULTANT AT:
Protective Intelligence and Assessment
Behavioral Analysis and Threat Assessment
Private-Sector Intelligence Analyst Lyle@SentinelIntelligenceServices.com
____________________ ____________________
Wednesday –
Email Briefing: NON-CLASSIFIED
November the 18th, 2010″
“While much of America was caught up with the political intrigue of the recent elections a most grave and alarming event occurred, 30-miles off the coast of Los Angeles. The incident I reference was the mysterious and completely unexpected firing of a large Cruise or ICBM missile, launched by a sub-surface aquatic platform. This incident is further momentous and fraught with peril due to the defense systems and protocols in place that should have caught the sub sitting out there in the first place, not to mention when an object went airborne. Adding an ominous dimension to this already very disturbing event, I fear our national security is truly threatened by a weak man posing as Commander-in-Chief, and who has demonstrated limited problem-solving ability. What scares me more is the absence of leadership at the highest levels in the Pentagon.
What America saw on commercial TV was a missile launch, and this same image was captured by NORAD, immediately assessed by a variety of military experts and simultaneously passed forward to a four-star General, who then made almost instant contact with the President. This IS the system; the protocol in place and practiced frequently – for just a moment like this. There is no excuse for failure; it is NOT an option. NORAD and the assessment/response system are one of the most critical missions and tenets of National Defense and its sole purpose of protecting the American people. Any mistake, any deviation from protocol, any cut corners or casual response, any failure in the system and the most intense review from the highest level is initiated, as well as discipline and even removal from status or position can occur.
Twenty-four hours a day, every day, a team of approximately 150-highly qualified and selected professionals, led by a Brigadier General in conjunction with one of the most sophisticated computer and reporting systems in the world is fed data from different sensors able to detect “missile shots” from any point on the globe. An unknown missile launch directly off the coast of America would have automatically triggered a well scripted National Security response by NORAD informing the Commander-in-Chief. The decision to officially announce that North America was not threatened and all the excitement was due to an aircraft leaving a contrail is a decision that reaches beyond the four-star General level and goes directly to a decision made by the Commander-in-Chief. This is also part of the system in place which can not be altered.
Mr. Obama continues to deceive WE THE PEOPLE, choosing to keep the American people in the dark on an issue that constitutes a real Clear and Present Danger. It is quite understandable why Americans view most of what comes out of our government’s official statements as well intended deceptions, purposeful misinformation, or conversely, muted with no explanation. It is equally understandable why so many believe there are actually conspiracies at work within our government to keep Americans confused and mind controlled. Other country’s leaders have assessed Mr. Obama as morally weak, conflicted, and with the results of these recent elections, politically lost. What staggers the imagination is what motivates the military by going along with such deviousness? Where are our military leaders who have sworn to defend the constitution? I know they are better than this, and in their own private clubs, they must be ashamed and perplexed. I pray they are because that would signal they still have a conscience at work within them, something Mr. Obama does not appear to possess.
Intel chatter suggests China sent a shot across the bow of America to signal their growing displeasure, and even anger, at Mr. Obama and associates for messing with the world’s economy.”
Obama style Chicago politics, Like Barack, like Rahm: Ballot tactics ring familiar, John Kass
John Kass of the Chicago Tribune has been telling it like it is for years.
November 18, 2010.
“White House Bare-knuckle strategy to douse residency questions harkens to Obama’s 1996 state Senate race”
“Rahm Emanuel’s campaign demanded Wednesday that his opponents condemn efforts to challenge his candidacy and knock him off the Chicago mayoral ballot.
“News reports indicate that political operatives are organizing an attempt to limit the choices of Chicago voters in the mayoral election,” Emanuel spokesman Ben LaBolt told reporters about my Wednesday column.
That column detailed the coming legal challenges to Rahm’s candidacy. These include the fact — confirmed by all sides now — that while he lived in Washington, Emanuel was twice purged from the Chicago voter rolls yet was allowed to vote absentee even though he wasn’t living at his old North Side address.
How this was done may be explained any day now, as election law expert Burt Odelson is expected to challenge Rahm’s candidacy before the city elections board.
Naturally, the Emanuel campaign put its own spin on things.
“Every mayoral candidate has an obligation to state whether they are involved in this effort,” LaBolt said. “If they’re not involved, they have an obligation to publicly condemn it.”
That’s an admirable strategy by an able public relations guy. And I’m in agreement that Rahm is a Chicagoan and should be allowed to run for mayor. But then, there’s that irritating law, which says in order to run for mayor, a candidate must live in the city a year before the election.
Yet this highly principled demand from the Rahministas, about condemning political operators who seek to limit the choices of the voters, reminds me of a guy.
He’s a famous Chicago politician, known across the world. And he, too, used bare-knuckle tactics before the Chicago election board to knock his opponents off the primary ballot.
He not only knocked off his main rival. By the time he was done, this politician knocked all of them off — The Chicago Way.
And “voter choice”? Are you kidding? After this guy was through, voters had no choice at all. He was the only one left on the ballot.
This candidate’s name?
Barack Obama.
Yes, the very same fellow who is now president of the United States and was, until quite recently, the boss to both Emanuel and LaBolt in Washington.
In the 1996 Democratic primary campaign for the Illinois Senate, Obama used every trick in the book before the election board to get rid of his four opponents.
He didn’t challenge their residency. Instead, Obama challenged their petitions of candidacy. And years later, as he campaigned for the presidency, he was billed as a reformer, not some old-school Chicago pol.”
Texas bill, Birth certificate required for presidential candidate, Texas secretary of state, Obama birth certificate, Lubbock Avalanche-Journal
“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans
“When you pick up your morning or evening newspaper and think
you are reading the news of the world, what you are reading
is a propaganda which has been selected, revised, and doctored
by some power which has a financial interest in you.”…. Upton Sinclair
From the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal November 17, 2010.
“A state representative on Tuesday filed a bill that would require any candidate for president or vice president of the United States to show his or her birth certificate to the Texas secretary of state, another indication of just how ambitious the conservative agenda for next year’s session of the Texas Legislature is expected to be.
“This bill is necessary because we have a president whom the American people don’t know whether he was born in Kenya or some other place,” Rep. Leo Berman, R-Tyler, said in reference to President Barack Obama and of House Bill 295. “If you are running for president or vice president, you’ve got to show here in Texas that you were born in the United States and the birth certificate is your proof.”
Berman’s bill specifies that “the secretary of state may not certify the name of a candidate for president or vice-president unless the candidate has presented the original birth certificate indicating that the person is a natural-born United States citizen.”
If the Legislature passes the proposed legislation and Gov. Rick Perry signs it into law, it would become effective on Sept. 1, 2011, six months before the state holds its 2012 presidential primaries.
Berman’s proposal is similar to one introduced in the Arizona Legislature this year which prompted the Arizona Republic, the largest newspaper in that state, to write: “The legislation originated from a fringe group that believes President Barack Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States and therefore ineligible to be president.”
The so-called “birther movement,” which questions Obama’s citizenship, started during the 2008 presidential campaign and though most news organizations have reported that there is overwhelming evidence that the president was born in Hawaii in 1961, there is small percentage of the U.S. population which is not convinced.”
My response to the following paragraph from above:
“The so-called “birther movement,” which questions Obama’s citizenship, started during the 2008 presidential campaign and though most news organizations have reported that there is overwhelming evidence that the president was born in Hawaii in 1961, there is small percentage of the U.S. population which is not convinced.”
The following is a factual statement:
“most news organizations have reported that there is overwhelming evidence that the president was born in Hawaii in 1961”
Most “news organizations” did repeat that lie.
“there is small percentage of the U.S. population which is not convinced.”
Apparently, the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal is part of the conspiracy to perpetuate the lies.
Facts:
July 2009 AOL Poll: 81% say Obama should release birth certificate.
August 2009 Public Policy Polling of Virginia:
Born elsewhere 24%
Not sure 24%
July 2010 CNN Poll: Less than half were convinced of Obama US birth.
Probably born in US 29 %
Probably born elsewhere 16 %
Definitely born elsewhere 11 %
So, Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, what is your excuse for inaccurate reporting?
Bias?
Sloppy reporting?
You tell me and I will report it.
A good start would be to report the facts. I will be glad to assist you.
Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) will be guests on the Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate on Wednesday, 17 Nov 2010, at 9:00 p.m. EST. The subject will be the latest news about the Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al lawsuit and Petition filing at the U.S. Supreme Court including review of the four questions presented in the Petition. Two Justices, Sotomayer and Kagan, have been requested in the Petition to recuse themselves from this case in that they have a direct financial conflict of interest in the outcome of this case, i.e., their very appointments to the court. We have also asked the Justices in our Petition to take judicial notice of the LTC Lakin court martial in process and the Affidavit filed in that military trial by Lt General McInerney as to the impact that the uncertainty of the constitutional eligibility of Obama is having on our military whose members have all sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. Recent activity in the case includes an Amicus Curiae Brief which was filed by the Western Center of Journalism in support of the Kerchner et al v Obama et al Petition for Writ of Certiorari before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court was filed on 30 Sep 2010 and is now scheduled on the Supreme Court docket for discussion by the Supreme Court Justices in conference by them on 23 Nov 2010. To read the Petition see this link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/38506403/Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-filed-with-the-U-S-Supreme-Court-for-Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress
QUESTIONS PRESENTED TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT:
PETITION 10-446
1. Whether petitioners sufficiently articulated a case or controversy against respondents which gives them Article III standing to make their Fifth Amendment due process and equal protection claims against them.
2. Whether putative President Obama can be an Article II “natural born Citizen” if he was born in the United States to a United States citizen mother and a non-United States citizen British father and under the British Nationality Act 1948 he was born a British citizen.
3. Whether putative President Obama and Congress violated petitioners’ Fifth Amendment due process rights to life, liberty, safety, security, tranquility, and property and Ninth Amendment rights by Congress failing to assure them pursuant to the Twentieth Amendment that Obama qualified as an Article II “natural born Citizen” before confirming his electoral votes and by Obama refusing to conclusively prove that he is a “natural born Citizen.”
4. Whether Congress violated petitioners’ rights under the Fifth Amendment to equal protection of their life, liberty, safety, security, tranquility, and property by investigating and confirming the “natural born Citizen” status of presidential candidate, John McCain, but not that of presidential candidate, Barack Obama.
Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
Please if you can, see this site and help the cause with a donation: http://www.protectourliberty.org
####
Wikipedia scrubs Lakin article, Orwellian news control, Obama eligibility
“If the party could thrust its hand into the past and say
of this and that event, it never happened–that, surely,
was more terrifying than mere torture and death.”
“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″
Once again, Wikipedia has scrubbed an article that is unfavorable for Barack Obama. Once again I am reminded of “1984” by George Orwell.
From the Birther Report.
“Wikipedia has scrubbed an entry on the court-martial of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, the Army officer who has refused orders because he questions the eligibility of the commander in chief.
The popular online encyclopedia redirects a search of Lakin’s name to an entry entitled “Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories.”
The creator of the entry calls the move “a clear attempt by the Wikipedia community to label inquiries into Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president as a ‘conspiracy theory.”
“While Wikipedia has a process for readers to comment after an article has been nominated for deletion, the time between my article being nominated for deletion, being rescrubbed and then being redirected to the Obama conspiracy theory article was a total of only one hour and 11 minutes,” said “Al,” who wants to remain anonymous because he fears reprisals from Obama supporters.
Yesterday, WND participated with Al in an hour-long interview on Peter Boyle’s Denver radio show on 630 KNOW that focused on the Wikipedia scrubbing. [embedded below]
Al pointed out that the deletion process usually takes much longer on Wikipedia, allowing for a rigorous defense and robust debate over the article in question that can stretch over several days.”
“From Citizen Wells, May 12, 2009
“From a 1944 Norman Thomas speech:
“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism.
But, under the name of “liberalism”,
they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program,
until one day America will be a socialist nation,
without knowing how it happened.”
“I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party.
The Democratic Party has adopted our platform.”
*** I did not get the quote from Wikipedia originally, but I did read it there before writing this article. It was there approx 1 and 1/2 hours ago. I just checked and it is not there. Did Wikipedia scrub the quote? ***”
Wikipedia internet scrubbing part 1
From Citizen Wells, May 21, 2009
“We have the second instance of internet scrubbing reported on this blog in the past several weeks. Today, one of the great commenters on this blog, GBAmerica brought this to our attention:
“They scrubbed Wiki!Our founding father John Bingham from the state of Ohio defined Natural Born Citizen!To hold highest office you must be a natural born citizen which means to be born on US soil and BOTH PARENTS to be BORN on US soil with no Foreign or Domestic Soverigty from any of them!It doesn’t matter where he is born his father was NOT BORN HERE!!!John Bingham put that there to protect WE THE PEOPLE!!!Look it up at the library!””
Wikipedia internet scrubbing part 2”
“An Illinois judge will hear a request for a preliminary injunction against Wikimedia/Wikipedia
Andy Martin says the Wikimedia Foundation is nothing more than a tax-exempt division of Barack Obama’s political operations
Martin’s lawsuit charges that Wikimedia falsely invokes the Communications Decency Act to defraud federal and state judges as to the true nature of Wikipedia’s operations
Martin is seeking an injunction against Wikimedia/Wikipedia”
Congress acted on misinformation and lies in 2008 2009, Obama eligibility, Congressmen better pay attention now
“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans
I don’t always reveal all that I am thinking about or working on. I do continue to support LTC Terry Lakin as well as uphold the US Constitution. This blog, as often stated, is a group effort. Major players in the Obama eligibility issues send me info on a regular basis. A recent one was a reminder that Richard Burr, senator from NC, made foolish, uninformed statements regarding Obama’s eligibility. As a resident and lifelong citizen of NC, I feel an obligation to set the record straight with Mr. Burr. I intend to do so.
As reported by The American Patriot Foundation.
“Certain Members of Congress based their claims that Obama was born in Hawaii almost entirely upon an online document (a Certifi-cation of Live Birth – not to be confused with an original birth certificate) – which the State of Hawaii has refused to verify as a state-issued document. In some cases, Congressmen out-sourced research on the eligibility issue to Senator Obama’s office, or to Obama-friendly websites such as FactCheck.org. or friendly news-papers. Yet with regard to McCain, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing to try to determine his “natural born” status and approved a non-binding resolution affirming his eligibility. Senator McCain produced a long-form birth certificate (with hospital and attending doctor’s name) after being subjected to relentless ques-tions about his eligibility. Senator Obama co-sponsored this legisla-tion, but never produced a copy of his original birth certificate, and to this day, refuses to provide the name of a hospital of birth or an attending physician’s name to corroborate his claimed birth in Ha-waii.”
“Richard Burr:
Statement: “It is my understanding that President-Elect Obama
has released an official copy of his birth certificate. Since
he was born in 1961 in Hawaii, he is eligible under the Constitution
to run for and hold the office of President of the United
States. In addition, President-elect Obama’s birth records
have been certified and validated by the Hawaii Department
of Health as well as by experts from the University of Pennsylvania.”
Editorial comment: A Certification of Live Birth is NOT an
original birth certificate. No one from the the University of
Pennsylvania has ever certified and validated Obama’s original
birth certificate or any birth record from the Hawaiian Dept of
Health.”
To: Senator Burr
From: Citizen Wells
I will be contacting your office to inform you of this article and my intentions. I believe that you are an honorable man and a decent senator who, like so many others in Congress and the nation, were fooled by a slick Orwellian propaganda machine. However, that does not relieve you of your obligation to learn the truth and follow your oath to defend the US Constitution.
Senator Burr, first ponder the simple question:
“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”
I will be glad to explain this to you in more detail, with copies of press releases and court records, but to further get your attention, consider this.
These two characters look like they just left a frat party.
From The Obama File.
“I was looking for a photo to add to the left column, when I re-discovered these photos of the two people who “certified” Obama’s eligibility to serve as POTUS.
They are employees of FactCheck.org, an organization that bills itself as “non-partisan,” but is part of the Annenberg network of liberal-left causes and organizations — just like Bill Ayers’ Chicago Annenberg Challenge — Annenberg, and its causes, are way left of center.
As the world now knows, FactCheck.org published a web page entitled, “Born in the U.S.A. — The truth about Obama’s birth certificate.” The entire webpage is ONE BIG LIE!
The counterfeit document FactCheck.org is proffering on this page, and refers to as a birth certificate — 31 times — is not a birth certificate — it’s not even real — it’s a bunch of zeroes and ones on a server database. At least three qualified examiners have said it’s bogus. But that didn’t stop FactCheck.org from employing Goebbel’s “Big Lie” technique:
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
And it worked!
This absurd webpage, and the bogus document it contains, has been referenced by judges, members of Congress and the ObamaMedia as prima facie evidence that Barack Obama is eligible to serve as Commander in Chief, even though the Obama Campaign has publicly admitted that Obama was — “at birth” — a citizen of Kenya, a British subject and is a “native [born US] citizen” — it’s on their website — anchor babies are “native born citizens.”
“Native born” citizenship status is different than “natural born” citizenship. “Native born” American citizens are simply not eligible to serve as Commander in Chief.
FactCheck.org identifies their anal-ists as Jess Henig and Joe Miller. OK, that’s fine, but who and what are Jess Henig and Joe Miller? Are they qualified to perform an analysis of ANY document, or are they just a couple of guys hanging around FactCheck.org’s office, or are they political operators? What are their bona fides? FactCheck.org doesn’t say. Wonder why?”
“Well, I found out. The two FactCheck.org employees who were granted access to Obama’s bogus Certification of Live Birth (COLB) are NOT document examiners or experts. Joe Miller has a Ph. D. in Political Philosophy — so he’s a political operative — while Jess Henig has an M.A. in English Literature — I’m not sure her dye-job is a political or esthetic statement. ”
With LTC Terry Lakin’s court-martial only one month out, the American Patriot Foundation is encouraging phone calls to Congress next week and to newly elected Members of the House and Senate– to drive home the fact that a decorated 18-year serving Army officer with numerous deployment overseas and winner of a Bronze Star– is facing imprisonment for defying military orders in order to seek assurance that the President/Commander-in-Chief is Constitutionally eligible to serve in his current post.
Since Nuremberg, servicemembers are trained to question illegal orders, yet for more than a year, no one in the Pentagon could answer LTC Lakin’s simple question– is there proof that the CINC is legally, Constitutionally eligible to be in charge of the U.S. Armed Forces? LTC Lakin would have been part of Barack Obama’s surge forces to Afghanistan– but now he faces up to four years of hard labor at Fort Leavenworth prison– if convicted at court-martial on December 14th.
You can also download our latest document: Download APF’s New Blunders Report: A Sampling of Common Blunders and Uncorroborated Statements by Members of Congress about Obama’s Birth and Constitutional Eligibility
Note: We continue to need your contributions to support Terry’s communications efforts. He also needs your prayers. And so, we ask that you not only once again go to our website www.safeguardourconstiution.com and make a tax deductible donation.
US Constitution Hall of Shame, New Congressmen, Will they listen?, Will they obey the Constitution?
“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans
From the US Constitution Hall of Shame, created in 2008.
““I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation
or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge
the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.” Congressional oath of office
The following Senators and Representatives were added to
the US Constitution Hall of Shame because of their
inaccurate or ambiguous responses to concerns voiced to
them about Barack Obama’s eligibility. The congressmen
provided reponses that ranged from confused to utter
stupidity and party bias. It is recognized that many of
them have been fooled just as many in the public have
been. Some of these congressmen have a consistent
pattern of putting party politics over country. However,
it is hoped that many, when confronted with the facts
relating to Obama’s eligibility and the 2008 election,
will ask questions and endeavor to seek the truth.
Congress will convene on January 8, 2009 to count and
validate the Electoral College votes. This presents an
opportunity to challenge the Electoral College votes and
Obama’s eligibility. It is apparent, that after learning
the truth about Obama’s lack of qualifications, many in
congress will be compelled to demand that Obama provide
proof of eligibility.
Contact these congressmen and make sure they know the truth.
We suggest that you call their office(s).”
Not one member of Congress stood up to challenge Obama’s eligibility before or during the Electoral College certification in January 2009, despite being forewarned and despite their oaths to uphold the US Constitution.
There has been “much water over the dam” since that moment. More of the real Barack Obama has been exposed. More candidates running for office during the last election have been listening to the public, more have aligned themselves with the Constitution and anti big government initiatives like the Tea Party Movement.
I am requesting your input. Of all the new members of Congress, who do you believe is most ready to “walk the walk” and not just “talk the talk” regarding Constitutional issues, including, but not limited to, Obama’s eligibility.
Greensboro ranked 2, Most religious city in US, NC, Charlotte Raleigh Durham rank high
I was born and raised in NC. I live in North Carolina now. I consider myself extremely fortunate to have lived here and been surrounded by so many good people. So many people trying to live their lives the right way and care about others. I am forever praising my home state and giving thanks for my parents, teachers and friends from church and everyday life. The following news came as no surprise to me.
From the Charlotte Observer November 11, 2010.
“Magazine ranks Greensboro as #2 most religious city in U.S.”
“A new study by Men’s Health magazine ranked Greensboro number two on the magazine’s list of America’s Most Religious Cities.
Colorado Springs, Colo. topped the list. Three other North Carolina cities ranked high on the list of 100, Charlotte was number nine, Raleigh, 13, and Durham, 14.
Men’s Health said it scoured U.S. Census Bureau data, the yellow pages and other resources to rank America’s holiest hometowns.
Among the criteria was the number of places of worship per capita. In Greensboro they abound.
“There are a lot of choices here in town. It’s a good sign,” said Clarke Martin, executive director of Guilford Interfaith Hospitality Network. “I’m encouraged by it. It did make me think about what’s going on in the rest of the country.”
The magazine looked at the number of religious organizations in each city. Martin’s is one of many in Greensboro and churches are its life blood.
“We have 59 churches that support our network,” he said. “We’re a homeless center for family. Homeless children and their parents are who we minister to.””
“”This is a good community. People like living here,” said Lana Gainey, a Network volunteer and parishioner at St. Paul the Apostle Catholic Church. “If we are members of churches I think our pastors and our ministers reach out to us to help.”
The rankings wouldn’t likely change hearts, but Martin said it looked like Greensboro’s heart already was in the right place.
“It’s good to know in Greensboro that there are indications that God is at work,” he said.”
I have traveled over much of the country. I have found good people everywhere. I have also listened to people making disparaging remarks about the south, the bible belt and those who attend church. It is true that too many attending church are less than perfect. However, the vast majority of those I have been around who have the moral compass, and I don’t mean just protestants, who believe that there is a creator, who believe in the golden rule and who try to live their lives in a godly manner, have made this a better world, and most definitely, a better state.
Citizen WElls 
Missile controversy, Los Angeles coast, Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D. commentary, National security threatened by Obama
Missile controversy, Los Angeles coast, Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D. commentary, National security threatened by Obama
From Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D., November 18, 2010.
“SENTINEL INTELLIGENCE SERVICES, LLC
LYLE J. RAPACKI, Ph.D.
____________
CONSULTANT AT:
Protective Intelligence and Assessment
Behavioral Analysis and Threat Assessment
Private-Sector Intelligence Analyst Lyle@SentinelIntelligenceServices.com
____________________ ____________________
Wednesday –
Email Briefing: NON-CLASSIFIED
November the 18th, 2010″
“While much of America was caught up with the political intrigue of the recent elections a most grave and alarming event occurred, 30-miles off the coast of Los Angeles. The incident I reference was the mysterious and completely unexpected firing of a large Cruise or ICBM missile, launched by a sub-surface aquatic platform. This incident is further momentous and fraught with peril due to the defense systems and protocols in place that should have caught the sub sitting out there in the first place, not to mention when an object went airborne. Adding an ominous dimension to this already very disturbing event, I fear our national security is truly threatened by a weak man posing as Commander-in-Chief, and who has demonstrated limited problem-solving ability. What scares me more is the absence of leadership at the highest levels in the Pentagon.
What America saw on commercial TV was a missile launch, and this same image was captured by NORAD, immediately assessed by a variety of military experts and simultaneously passed forward to a four-star General, who then made almost instant contact with the President. This IS the system; the protocol in place and practiced frequently – for just a moment like this. There is no excuse for failure; it is NOT an option. NORAD and the assessment/response system are one of the most critical missions and tenets of National Defense and its sole purpose of protecting the American people. Any mistake, any deviation from protocol, any cut corners or casual response, any failure in the system and the most intense review from the highest level is initiated, as well as discipline and even removal from status or position can occur.
Twenty-four hours a day, every day, a team of approximately 150-highly qualified and selected professionals, led by a Brigadier General in conjunction with one of the most sophisticated computer and reporting systems in the world is fed data from different sensors able to detect “missile shots” from any point on the globe. An unknown missile launch directly off the coast of America would have automatically triggered a well scripted National Security response by NORAD informing the Commander-in-Chief. The decision to officially announce that North America was not threatened and all the excitement was due to an aircraft leaving a contrail is a decision that reaches beyond the four-star General level and goes directly to a decision made by the Commander-in-Chief. This is also part of the system in place which can not be altered.
Mr. Obama continues to deceive WE THE PEOPLE, choosing to keep the American people in the dark on an issue that constitutes a real Clear and Present Danger. It is quite understandable why Americans view most of what comes out of our government’s official statements as well intended deceptions, purposeful misinformation, or conversely, muted with no explanation. It is equally understandable why so many believe there are actually conspiracies at work within our government to keep Americans confused and mind controlled. Other country’s leaders have assessed Mr. Obama as morally weak, conflicted, and with the results of these recent elections, politically lost. What staggers the imagination is what motivates the military by going along with such deviousness? Where are our military leaders who have sworn to defend the constitution? I know they are better than this, and in their own private clubs, they must be ashamed and perplexed. I pray they are because that would signal they still have a conscience at work within them, something Mr. Obama does not appear to possess.
Intel chatter suggests China sent a shot across the bow of America to signal their growing displeasure, and even anger, at Mr. Obama and associates for messing with the world’s economy.”
Read more:
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid=0.1&thid=12c5f7c643657dec&mt=application/msword&url=https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui%3D2%26ik%3D2485918dad%26view%3Datt%26th%3D12c5f7c643657dec%26attid%3D0.1%26disp%3Dattd%26zw&sig=AHIEtbS-3lD97dADAJPTn6oCvB065TvAFw&pli=1
About Lyle J. Rapacki, Ph.D.:
http://www.sentinelintelligenceservices.com/About-Us.html
32 Comments
Posted in Barack Obama, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Commander in Chief, Government, Military officers, News, Obama, Obama lies, Obama Nation, The Case Against Barack Obama, United States, US Military, Washington DC, white house
Tagged Los Angeles coast, Lyle J. Rapacki, Missile controversy, National security threatened by Obama, Ph.D. commentary