Blagojevich trial, Joseph Cari, Two for one witness, Cari tied to Chicago corruption and Joe Biden, Joseph Cari testimony, June 17, 2010

Blagojevich trial, Joseph Cari, Two for one witness, Cari tied to Chicago corruption  and Joe Biden

Joseph Cari, Democratic National Committee finance chairman, tied to Chicago corruption, is on the witness stand today, Thursday, June 17, 2010. Cari is a two for one witness. He has ties to corruption and Joe Biden.

From the Tony Rezko trial.

April 15, 2008
“Former Democratic fundraiser Joseph Cari testified Tuesday afternoon about a 2003 fundraising trip he took to New York with Gov. Rod Blagojevich, offering some of the most damaging testimony for the governor to emerge from the trial of his fundraiser Antoin “Tony” Rezko.

Cari said the governor told him that he thought it would be easy to raise money for a presidential run because a governor had the ability to raise money by handing out contracts and state business.

Cari said his conversation with Blagojevich took place on a private plane arranged by Stuart Levine, the star witness in the case against Rezko who finished lengthy testimony earlier Tuesday.

Blagojevich told him how happy he was to be governor, Cari said, “but also that he had aspirations beyond the governorship.”

Cari said he discussed with Blagojevich why former President Bill Clinton had been successful running for the office as a sitting governor in Arkansas. Blagojevich told him that it was easier for a governor to make a run than a senator “because a governor had the ability to award contracts,” Cari said. “It was easier to obtain contributions.””

“Cari said he met with Stuart Levine at Rezko’s office in January that year. Rezko said he had the power to award contracts and get consultants hired through the governor’s then-chief of staff, Lon Monk, Cari said.

“Mr. Monk took direction from [Rezko],” Cari told the jury.

Rezko illustrated his clout by picking up the phone and apparently calling Monk in front of him, Cari said.”

“Cari said he was a go-between for one of his partners at HealthPoint and tried to follow Levine’s orders to have a finder’s fee paid on an $80 million allocation for JER from the Illinois Teachers’ Retirement System.

When the arrangement was delayed, Cari said, he spoke to a JER executive who was shepherding the TRS deal and told her what Levine had communicated to him. If JER didn’t hire the consultant that had been named, the allocation would be pulled.

“I unequivocally told her that,” Cari testified.

The governor and the people around him selected law firms, investment firms and consultants that were used in such arrangements, Cari said he told the executive.

“This has been the history of Illinois and this is the way in Illinois that it’s done,” he said.”

Read more:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-rezko-court-story-7,0,5224754.htmlstory

Citizen Wells August 26, 2008.

Joseph Cari tied to Joe Biden

“Vice-presidential candidate Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del. (left), has been advised since 1984 by Joseph Cari (right), the Chicago lawyer and onetime mega-fundraiser who has been tied to the Antoin “Tony” Rezko patronage scandal.”

“Chicago lawyer and onetime mega-fundraiser Joseph Cari has advised Biden and his campaigns on and off since 1984, serving in posts as varied as a Senate adviser on crime to the Midwest Political Director for Biden’s aborted 1987 presidential bid. In 2005 Cari helped arrange private meetings for Biden with potential supporters, as the senator explored another run for the White House. He has also worked to raise money for Biden . “

“Cari admitted that in 2004 he helped a Rezko associate by making calls in what turned out to be a kickback scheme. The deal was an offshoot of a complex corruption scheme wrought by Antoin “Tony” Rezko , whose ties to Obama have vexed the White House hopeful . Cari has maintained he did not know the details of that scheme or any other.

Cari’s sentencing is delayed while he cooperates with the investigation. He testified at Rezko’s trial earlier this year, in which a jury found Rezko guilty on 16 of 24 corruption-related felony charges. Obama, who entered into a complex real estate transaction with Rezko and his wife in 2005 that appeared to aid the senator, has returned nearly $150,000 in donations he received from Rezko and his associates over the years.”

Read more

62 responses to “Blagojevich trial, Joseph Cari, Two for one witness, Cari tied to Chicago corruption and Joe Biden, Joseph Cari testimony, June 17, 2010

  1. CW – This is too ironic -“Chicago lawyer and onetime mega-fundraiser Joseph Cari has advised Biden and his campaigns on and off since 1984″

    1984????

  2. citizenwells

    ms. helga.
    Life is full of irony.

  3. I am still looking for the story that appears to have been completely scrubbed regarding a gay aid that had used $300,000.00 of campaign funds from Biden’s run for Senate or President race.

    BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING AND ADJUSTING

  4. And BS2

  5. ‘Hypocrisy? Elena Kagan is your name’

    Protests ‘anti-gay’ military, accepts $20 million from Saudis

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=167781

  6. Petition Opposing Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominee Elena Kagan

    http://www.wnd.com/elena-kagan

  7. O/T I was under the impression, that the new energy bill (cap and trade) was pretty much dead in the senate. Last night, I heard someone in the administration ( I think it was Rahm) was going to make an announcement next week. And the Won was going to have a private meeting with none other than Mr. 41 himself on Wednesday.

    Geeze, ya think there’s gonna be some arm twisting or bribes going down?

    We need those from Massachusettes to melt the phone lines. Maybe we all need to phone Mr. Brown.

  8. citizenwells

    Gag order is on hold for the moment.

  9. Philo-Publius

    HonorFirst
    O/T I was under the impression, that the new energy bill (cap and trade) was pretty much dead in the senate.

    ——————————————————-
    White House Planning To Pass Cap and Trade in Lame Duck Session
    http://politifi.com/news/White-House-Planning-To-Pass-Cap-and-Trade-in-Lame-Duck-Session-1038005.html

  10. Look at the stupid evil media WHORES surround Mr. Hayward! They should be doing it to their evil fraud and asking him to produce the proof that he has the right to be at the white house. I am so sick of the media! Ask the evil SOB why he and his morons are destroying our country.

    Go sit down you bastard media!

  11. Pingback: Obama’s Steamy Secret – Man’s Country – The Globe – Larry Sinclair Counter Claim for Damages? – Lt. Col. Lakin has Rev. Manning’s Support – Gen. Vallely – We’re almost to the point of no return &

  12. Pingback: Obama’s Steamy Secret – Man’s Country – The Globe – Larry Sinclair Counter Claim for Damages? – Lt. Col. Lakin has Rev. Manning’s Support – Gen. Vallely – We’re almost to the point of no return &

  13. Good Morning!

    Gotta love Globe!

  14. Clearly, the boBots are trying to create Cognitive Dissonance on the forum to confuse True Patriots. They do this by pretending to be “patriots” themselves and interjecting FALSE statements like. “bo is a NBC,” “We must prosecute bo for crimes he committed in the 90’s,” “We can’t legally remove bo. Instead, we should demand that politicians certify his NBC status.” DON’T FALL FOR THIS BOGUS boBot CLAIMS. bo is NOT a NBC. It is too late to prosecute bo for CRIMES COMMITTED IN THE 1990’s, the boBots know this they are just trying to lead Patriots on a wild goose chase. Lastly, it is obvious that the politicians are NOT GOING TO REMOVE bo, they have refused to remove him time after time. It is a WASTE OF TIME to even consider any of the boBot FALSE CLAIMS.

  15. How much you want to bet that when the republicans take back control and have the 20 billion pay off from BP audited the records will disappear like Barry’s has??????

  16. zachjonesishome // June 17, 2010 at 10:07 am

    Good Morning!

    Gotta love Globe!
    *****************************************

    I got my copy of the GAY algore EXPOSE. When does the GAY bo EXPOSE come out?

  17. Free Speech, The military via Lt Col Lakin’s court martial, could oust Obama in a second if they want to.

  18. Ginger,

    I think you’re right.

    I also think that if the republicans take back congress in the fall they can prevent obama from giving billions of those dollars for democrat “walking around” money before the 2012 election.

  19. ” In 2005 Cari helped arrange private meetings for Biden with potential supporters, as the senator explored another run for the White House. He has also worked to raise money for Biden . “

    “Cari admitted that in 2004 he helped a Rezko associate by making calls in what turned out to be a kickback scheme.”

    Illinois Criminal Statute of Limitations
    24430

    Statute: 720 ILCS 5/3-5; 5/3-7

    Summary: The following sets forth the applicable crimes and the time period within which a prosecution must commence thereafter.

    Felonies:

    •1st or 2nd degree murder, attempt to commit 1st degree murder, criminal solicitation to commit murder, involuntary manslaughter, reckless homicide, treason, arson, forgery: N/A
    •Others: 3 years
    •Extended limitations when: victim of theft a minor or under legal disability, then during minority or legal disability or within 1 year of termination
    •Misconduct in public office: within 1 year of discovery (maximum 3 year extension)

  20. Free Speech – I think the new Globe comes out on Friday. However, it may depend on location.

    drip, drip, drip

    Have a great day!

    This was just posted by Keyes. Haven’t read it yet.

    Can Lt. Col. Lakin find justice in the military?
    June 16, 2010 · 0 comments
    http://loyaltoliberty.com/WordPress/2010/06/can-lt-col-lakin-find-justice-in-the-military/

  21. Keyes article came out yesterday. I missed it.

  22. Good Morning….Keep fighting the good fight. Stay Safe..God Bless.

  23. ” In 2005 Cari helped arrange private meetings for Biden with potential supporters, as the senator explored another run for the White House. He has also worked to raise money for Biden . “

    “Cari admitted that in 2004 he helped a Rezko associate by making calls in what turned out to be a kickback scheme.”

    Illinois Criminal Statute of Limitations
    24430

    Statute: 720 ILCS 5/3-5; 5/3-7

    Summary: The following sets forth the applicable crimes and the time period within which a prosecution must commence thereafter.

    Felonies:

    •1st or 2nd degree murder, attempt to commit 1st degree murder, criminal solicitation to commit murder, involuntary manslaughter, reckless homicide, treason, arson, forgery: N/A
    •Others: 3 years
    •Misconduct in public office: within 1 year of discovery (maximum 3 year extension)
    ****************************************

    In light of these Illinois Statutes of Limitations (limits on the time to prosecute criminals), Patriots should concentrate on Crimes committed by bo & his co-conspirators in 2008 and thereafter.

    Grand Jury Indictments should be rendered in the crimes committed by boChorts (Biden etc.) against Mr. Larry Sinclair ASAP.

    For criminal information for Grand Jury Indictments of bo go here:

    https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/category/nashville/

    For information on forming a legitimate Grand Jury go here:

    http://grandjury.blogtownhall.com

  24. citizenwells

    Richard.
    Noted and addressed.

  25. IMHO, there are two legal schemes at play presently in the blago trials:

    1) A scheme to get a hung jury or an acquittal for blago. Then the boBots will say “A jury found there was nothing to the charges against blago & bo.”

    2) A scheme to run out the clock on the time to prosecute bo for the crimes he committed in Illinois. (Statute of Limitations: •Misconduct in public office: within 1 year of discovery–maximum 3 year extension)

  26. (brought over from prior thread):

    Ms. Helga and yo –

    Before going on-line this morning I was reflecting upon the dilemma in which we find ourselves and had some serious thoughts.

    This is a poor analogy (what would be a good one for BHO?), but if we witnessed a car driving recklessly down the street at a high rate of speed and hitting one parked car after another, with the appearance that it was on purpose, what would we do? Well, of course, we would get someone to stop him. Later his past record would come into play, but the issue at hand would be to stop the crime.

    As I said, the above is a poor comparison, at best, to what BHO is doing to the country; however, my point is that all of the excellent recommendations by CW posters, such as state election fraud, formation of citizens’ grand juries, etc., are fine in themselves; however, the country is being subjected to such a dizzying array of BHO’s crimes and ineptness at such a high rate of speed that it is hard for even good patriots to keep up. It is difficult to inspire them to get involved with events which are slipping into the past – almost into oblivion. The pursuit of justice in the legal system is far too slow, notwithstanding the citizen grand jury system.

    Well, what is your solution, you may say? Impeachment! I know there are at least two arguments against that. First of all, with the Dems controlling both houses, that’s not going to happen. True – but the momentum needs to be building. Who knows, in time, you may even
    get some liberals on board (for opposite reasons). Then if there are elections in Nov., the Repubs may gain the majority and the landscape could change. Of course, we still need to be pursuing the other methods mentioned above.

    The second argument against impeachment is that we can’t impeach a usurper, because he never held the seat legitimately. Well, the courts and others in authority don’t acknowledge the usurper theory, at least not yet, so they would feel constitutionally justified in pursuing impeachment. Would we care? Would we let a technicality stop impeachment? After he was out of office then the criminal allegations could be made. I am not being at all skeptical of the good suggestions offered; I am at heart a pragmatist – a realist. Trying to get a citizens grand jury together in my county would be extremely hard, because even patriots are not interested enough to pursue it. First of all, getting an impartial jury – which is what it has to be in order to hold up – (should even be randomly selected if we follow present requirements) would be next to impossible. This all takes much time from a practical standpoint, unless we risk getting it all “thrown out”. Wrong or right, people are living in the “here and now” mentality.

    I agree with you:
    ms. helga // June 17, 2010 at 8:07 am

    “ONLY GOD can save this country”

  27. Cabby,

    I understand your frustration, but please do not fall into despair. As Aristotle has always said, it is unreasonable that out of the over 3000 possible Grand Jury Indictments of bo & his local co-conspirators, none will result in the legal removal of bo. So go ahead and organize a Grand Jury. Indict bo & napolitano, your former governor, and leave it up to the presiding judge & DA to proceed. If nothing else you may generate enough publicity to get a judge in Maricopa or Pinal County to follow through with the prosecution of bo.

    For criminal information for Grand Jury Indictments of bo go here:

    https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/category/nashville/

    For information on forming a legitimate Grand Jury go here:

    http://grandjury.blogtownhall.com
    Free Speech // June 17, 2010 at 10:47 am

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/06/how-to-start-and-lead-citizens-grand.html

  28. cabby,

    Lot of truth to what you say.

    I’ve been thinking that we’re approaching the same thing we had during the clinton years. It was called “scandal overload”. There are so many potential things to go after obama on in his personal life, but we’re faced with day after day of him doing things like a. bribing people to vote for the health care bill b. bribing people like sestak to not run c. illegally firing inspector general walpin, and it just goes on and on and on and on……

    peoples eyes tend to glaze over after awhile.

  29. yo, are you just going to give up? Surrender is not an option with bo. Look what happened in Germany when they surrendered to a madman.

  30. Alvin Greene: What if the Republicans were trying to reverse a win by an African American as opposed to the Democrats doing the same thing? (video)

  31. video: Do You Like Football? SC Senate Candidate Greene To Unsuspecting Female Student, Camille McCoy

  32. ms. helga // June 17, 2010 at 9:06 am
    Out of curiousity I also searched using every which way possible—no luck here either.

    Possibly it wasn’t an aide or staffer?

  33. Mayor Gulliani says bo horribly mismanaged the bo oil spill.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3096434/#37751429

  34. I got my copy of the GAY algore EXPOSE. When does the GAY bo EXPOSE come out?

    Well, pooh, I thought the ONE was already out!!!
    Coulda fooled me!!

  35. fs,

    I don’t want to give up. No.

    I just keep thinking that the only way to get him out is to show absolute proof to the country that he wasn’t born here or has committed a crime on his ss#, something like that.

    And I don’t think courts or politicians are going to help in that effort. I’m thinking we have to get the proof ourselves.

    If a citizens grand jury and trial can force him to give up the proof we need, i don’t fully understand how yet. Without the evidence of the real birth certificate, etc, i have a hard time thinking that the country will get behind a verdict by a citizens group. If the citizens group is going to get the evidence we need from discovery, who is it that will enforce those efforts to produce the documents?

    Maybe you could give a brief synopsis of how that works.

  36. I agree with you:
    ms. helga // June 17, 2010 at 8:07 am

    “ONLY GOD can save this country

    II Chronicles 7:14

  37. Free Speech // June 17, 2010 at 11:32 am

    Cabby,
    I understand your frustration, but please do not fall into despair. As Aristotle has always said, it is unreasonable that out of the over 3000 possible Grand Jury Indictments of bo & his local co-conspirators, none will result in the legal removal of bo

    Free Speech // June 17, 2010 at 11:39 am

    yo, are you just going to give up? Surrender is not an option with bo. Look what happened in Germany when they surrendered to a madman.
    ******************************
    Thank you, Free Speech, for being patient to hear me out and also for your words of encouragement! You do understand that I know the citizens grand jury IS the recommended way for We the People to be heard, but the times are moving so fast and so extensively that I feel we are like driving down a rough road at a high rate of speed and heading for a precipice not far ahead. In times like that extraordinary measures have to be taken, legally, of course.

    It is not a matter of despair or giving up. We can NEVER, NEVER give up!! All of the remedies need to be in play, and that includes the possibility of IMPEACHMENT, which could take place if we pressure Congress enough. I don’t know exactly what “enough” means. How about a “velvet” revolution? Could it come to that?

    With God in charge we should never come to the point of complete despair, that’s for sure. Thanks again for all you are doing, both here and at your other venues!

  38. yo // June 17, 2010 at 12:05 pm

    fs,

    I don’t want to give up. No.

    I just keep thinking that the only way to get him out is to show absolute proof to the country that he wasn’t born here or has committed a crime on his ss#, something like that.

    ACTUALLY A GRAND JURY DOES NOT NEED ABSOLUTE PROOF TO INDICT & AS I HAVE ALWAYS SAID THE CASE AGAINST bo WILL BE OVER IN DISCOVERY BEFORE THE CASE EVER GOES TO TRIAL. PLEASE SEE MY ARTICLE IN THE STEADY DRIP:

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/03/two-ideas-to-empower-patriots-by.html

    And I don’t think courts or politicians are going to help in that effort. I’m thinking we have to get the proof ourselves.

    AGAIN GRAND JURORS ONLY NEED PROBABLE CAUSE TO INDICT. IT IS SIMILAR TO A POLICE OFFICER ARRESTING SOMEONE FOR A CRIME HE MERELY SUSPECTS HAS BEEN COMMITTED. GRAND JURORS CAN INDICT ON THE SUSPICION THAT CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED. PLEASE SEE THIS THREAD FOR A RUNDOWN ON SOME OF THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY bo & LOCAL COHORTS.

    https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/category/nashville/

    If a citizens grand jury and trial can force him to give up the proof we need, i don’t fully understand how yet…. If the citizens group is going to get the evidence we need from discovery, who is it that will enforce those efforts to produce the documents?

    SCOTUS.

    Maybe you could give a brief synopsis of how that works.

    HERE’S HOW:

    It is noteworthy that it has been over a year and a half since I first began to write about the Citizens Grand Jury Process and Original Jurisdiction in the Supreme Court of cases against Barrack Hussein Obama and, to date, BHO’s lawyers have never been able to refute my Constitutional Theories.

    The precedent for getting standing and bringing a case directly to the United States Supreme Court upon Original Jurisdiction is the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Crunch) 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803). As succinctly stated by Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury, “If a persons duty is backed by law and not by political in nature, then he becomes subject of the law and is examinable by the court.”

    Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution states, “In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.”

    Marbury was a case involving a minor public minister. The case against Barrack Hussein Obama involves all “Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls” of the United States and of all foreign nations with diplomatic status with the United States. Furthermore, the case against Barrack Hussein Obama involves all States of the United States as parties.

    As in Marbury, We the People shall prosecute our cases against Barrack Hussein Obama petitioning the United States Supreme Court for a Writ of Mandamus compelling Barrack Hussein Obama to abide by the Constitutional Contract that he entered into with We the People on January 20, 2009 and uphold his Oath to abide by the Supreme Law of the Land, the Constitution of the United States of America.

    It is stated in United States v. Butterworth, 18 S. Ct. 441, 169 U.S. 600 at 602 (1898),
    “The office of a writ of mandamus is to compel the performance of a duty resting upon the person to whom the writ is sent. That duty may have originated in one way or in another. It may, as alleged in the present case, have arisen from the acceptance of an office which has imposed the duty upon its incumbent. But no matter out of what fact or relations the duty has grown, what the law requires, and what it seeks to enforce by a writ of mandamus, is the personal obligation of the individual to whom it addresses the writ.”

    Following much good faith research regarding the issue of original jurisdiction in the Supreme Court of the United States, We the People have found no cases in the history of jurisprudence of the United States of America wherein a Defendant disputed the Constitutional fact that the Supreme Court of the United States has original jurisdiction over “all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls” as plainly stated in the Constitution of the United States, Article III, Section 2.

    That being the case, “We the People” respectfully request that the Barack Hussein Obama stipulate to the fact that the Supreme Court of the United States has original jurisdiction over all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; or, in the alternative, that Barack Hussein Obama show good cause why the Supreme Court of the United States shall not have original jurisdiction

    These 12 Simple Steps are the way Patriots can use our Bill of Rights to keep control of the Government and to Clean up Corruption in government:

    1) Advertise and Promote the Fact that you are forming a Grand Jury in Blogs, Local Newspapers and Community Organizations.

    2) Form the Grand Jury and select a Foreman.

    3) Select a Private Attorney General to make Presentments to Grand Jury, if local DA refuses to make presentments.

    4) Select a convenient Meeting Place.

    5) Communicate with all Citizens who have criminal information to present.

    6) Schedule presentments by said Citizens.

    7) Subpoena documents from Government Offices and Officials.

    8. Schedule presentment of said Documents to Grand Jury by Grand Jury Attorney General.

    9) Have Grand Jury Attorney General present said Documents to Grand Jury.

    10) After investigation and deliberation is completed, vote and issue a True Bill (Indictment) or No True Bill.

    11) Announce all Indictments to the Press and schedule News Conferences in front of your local Court House.

    12) Serve the Indictment on the Judiciary at Court House News Conferences for the Issuance of Arrest Warrants.

  39. fs,

    Thanks for posting. Not being a lawyer, I don’t fully understand all of it, but some of it is sinking in.

  40. Cabby – AZ // June 17, 2010 at 12:14 pm

    Free Speech // June 17, 2010 at 11:32 am

    Cabby,
    I understand your frustration, but please do not fall into despair. As Aristotle has always said, it is unreasonable that out of the over 3000 possible Grand Jury Indictments of bo & his local co-conspirators, none will result in the legal removal of bo

    Free Speech // June 17, 2010 at 11:39 am

    yo, are you just going to give up? Surrender is not an option with bo. Look what happened in Germany when they surrendered to a madman.
    ******************************
    Thank you, Free Speech, for being patient to hear me out and also for your words of encouragement! You do understand that I know the citizens grand jury IS the recommended way for We the People to be heard, but the times are moving so fast and so extensively that I feel we are like driving down a rough road at a high rate of speed and heading for a precipice not far ahead. In times like that extraordinary measures have to be taken, legally, of course.

    I AGREE 100%!

    It is not a matter of despair or giving up. We can NEVER, NEVER give up!! All of the remedies need to be in play, and that includes the possibility of IMPEACHMENT, which could take place if we pressure Congress enough.

    I DO NOT AGREE ABOUT IMPEACHMENT. THIS CONGRESS IS NOT GOING TO IMPEACH bo. IT IS PRECISELY BECAUSE AS YOU STATED : “we are like driving down a rough road at a high rate of speed and heading for a precipice not far ahead…”
    THAT WE MUST FORM GRAND JURIES NOW! WE ARE ALREADY AT THE PRECIPICE NOW! WE DON’T HAVE TIME TO WAIT FOR THIS CONGRESS OR A “NEW” CONGRESS TO ACT TO IMPEACH, WE WILL BE UNDER MARTIAL LAW BEFORE THAT HAPPENS. THAT IS WHAT THE POLITICIANS WANT, MARTIAL LAW.

    I don’t know exactly what “enough” means. How about a “velvet” revolution? Could it come to that?

    TO MY MIND MASSIVE GRAND JURY INDICTMENTS IN UP TO 3000 + JURISDICTIONS IS THE “VELVET REVOLUTION.” IF NOT THAT I AM AFRAID THAT WE WILL HAVE CIVIL WAR.

    With God in charge we should never come to the point of complete despair, that’s for sure. Thanks again for all you are doing, both here and at your other venues!

    Cabby, I spent 60 days in jail on false charges. My faith in God is all that kept me from total despair.

  41. yo // June 17, 2010 at 12:43 pm

    fs,

    Thanks for posting. Not being a lawyer, I don’t fully understand all of it, but some of it is sinking in.
    *************************************

    U R welcome.

  42. Free Speech

    zachjonesishome // June 17, 2010 at 10:30 am

    Free Speech – I think the new Globe comes out on Friday. However, it may depend on location.

    drip, drip, drip

    Have a great day!

    This was just posted by Keyes. Haven’t read it yet.

    Can Lt. Col. Lakin find justice in the military?

    ********************************************

    Thanks, Zach! Evidently Col. Lakin will not get a fair trial, but it is my hope SCOTUS will hear the case and order discovery of bo.

  43. You decide

    Taking It to the People: How Do Presidents Stack Up?

    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/06/17/decide-did-obama/?test=latestnews

  44. 68truthseeker

    Robert Gibbs Is Asked About Obama’s Connecticut Social Security Number.

  45. Philo-Publius

    The Obama administration is reorganizing the federal agency of Immigration and Customs Enforcement to focus less on illegal alien deportations and more on criminal investigations and other duties.

    “Officials hope to highlight the agency’s counterterrorism, money laundering and other complex criminal investigations and in the process ‘re-brand’ ICE, turning the public — and political — spotlight away from its immigration work,” the Washington Post reported on Thursday
    http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Obama-Refocuses-ICE-Illegals/2010/06/17/id/362273

    —————
    Why not just change the name to ICE CREAM (Immigration and Customs Enforcement Clowns Rescue Enemies and Angry Mexicans)

  46. Immigration Reform…

    Should America Follow Arizona’s Lead?

    http://www.personalliberty.com/poll/immigration-reform/index.php?SC=BEL2324

  47. On the above video, I think the guy who stood up and left when that question was asked was Jake Trapper or the guy from MSNBC…he is on the kool aid bad…they are covering for this illegal alian.

  48. Free Speech

    Pictures of illegal water stations bo’s regime is providing for the illegal Terrorists invading Arizona.

    http://www.desertinvasion.us/invasion_pictures/invasion_aid.html

  49. …True, the grand jury cannot compel the appearance of witnesses and the production of evidence, and must appeal to the court when such compulsion is required. See, e. g., Brown v. United States, 359 U.S. 41, 49 (1959). And the court will refuse to lend its assistance when the compulsion the grand jury seeks would override rights accorded by the Constitution, see, e. g., Gravel v. United States, 408 U.S. 606 (1972) (grand jury subpoena effectively qualified by order limiting questioning so as to preserve Speech or Debate Clause immunity), or even testimonial privileges recognized by the common law, see In re Grand Jury Investigation of Hugle, 754 F. 2d 863 (CA9 1985) (same with respect to privilege for confidential marital communications) (opinion of Kennedy, J.). Even in this setting, however, we have insisted that the grand jury remain “free to pursue its investigations unhindered by external influence or supervision so long as it does not trench upon the legitimate rights of any witness called before it.” United States v. Dionisio, 410 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1973).

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/90-1972.ZO.html

    This decision authored by J. Scalia in Williams is the seminal case cited by proponents of conjuring up a grand jury to indict or, as they have urged you say, to investigate BO. Notice that while the grand jury is an independent body; it derives its investigative powers from the same court it steadfastly accuses has been co-opted against justice. Plus the success of this venture depends on the agreement of at least one elected official to agree to prosecute based on this indictment. And its proponents have already urged you not to bother petitioning your elected public officials for redress. At least, these statements urging citizens to forgo seeking redress of grievances through the courts and public officials, have been plastered on this blog.

  50. BORN IN THE USA?

    Hawaiian elections clerk has eligibility ‘solution’
    Official who says Obama has no birth certificate thinks idea would ‘solve the entire controversy.

    (excerpt)
    At the request of his university, Adams is now declining any further comment on the matter.

    http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=165633

  51. Free Speech

    jbjd // June 17, 2010 at 2:19 pm

    This decision authored by J. Scalia in Williams is the seminal case cited by proponents of conjuring up a grand jury to indict or, as they have urged you say, to investigate BO. Notice that while the grand jury is an independent body; it derives its investigative powers from the same court it steadfastly accuses has been co-opted against justice. Plus the success of this venture depends on the agreement of at least one elected official to agree to prosecute based on this indictment. And its proponents have already urged you not to bother petitioning your elected public officials for redress.

    ****************************************

    Who R U referring to? That is a NOT TRUE of my position regarding SCOTUS. Here is a TRUE statement of my position.

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/03/two-ideas-to-empower-patriots-by.html

    Did you know that any citizen patriot can bring a criminal case against Barrack Hussein Obama in the County in which they reside? You do not have to be an Attorney General to indict a ham sandwich or a Barrack Obama. If a patriot had evidence of a crime committed by the 2008 BO campaign and that patriot presented said evidence to a sympathetic Grand Jury with a charge of conspiracy to commit said crime against Barrack Obama, that patriot could get BO indicted like that proverbial ham sandwich.

    You might wonder how you get evidence against BO and members of his 2008 campaign? There were many newspaper, internet blog and TV reports of crimes committed by BO’s campaign workers all across the USA in 2007 and 2008. All you have to do is perform a google search to begin to write your presentation of criminal information for the indictment of BO and his co-conspirators in your County.

    You might also give your friendly Sheriff or Police Chief a call and see if you can get some assistance from local law enforcement personnel in gathering evidence against the BO campaign.

  52. Free Speech

    Speech // June 17, 2010 at 10:10 am

    Clearly, the boBots are trying to create Cognitive Dissonance on the forum to confuse True Patriots. They do this by pretending to be “patriots” themselves and interjecting FALSE statements like. “bo is a NBC,” “We must prosecute bo for crimes he committed in the 90′s,” “We can’t legally remove bo. Instead, we should demand that politicians certify his NBC status,” “And Grand Jury proponents have already urged you not to bother petitioning your elected public officials for redress.” DON’T FALL FOR THESE BOGUS boBot CLAIMS.

    bo is NOT a NBC. It is too late to prosecute bo for CRIMES COMMITTED IN THE 1990′s, the boBots know this they are just trying to lead Patriots on a wild goose chase. It is clear that I have always urged Patriots to seek the help of their Local Sheriffs, DA’s & Police Chiefs prior to convening an independent Citizens Grand Jury. It is only after being denied redress by local officials that you should form an independent Citizens Grand Jury.

    It is a WASTE OF TIME to even consider any of the boBot FALSE CLAIMS.

  53. Leo H. says, “…bo is NOT a NBC. It is too late to prosecute bo for CRIMES COMMITTED IN THE 1990′s,…”
    **********************************
    Please cite to actual evidence of the comments/statements that form the basis for your rebuttal. Specifically, using words taken from comments posted on this blog, show us that someone 1) claimed BO is a NBC; and 2) advocated that he should be prosecuted for crimes committed in the 1990’s.

  54. Leo H. advises, “You might also give your friendly Sheriff or Police Chief a call and see if you can get some assistance from local law enforcement personnel in gathering evidence against the BO campaign.”
    ***********************************
    Remember, no law enforcement official has the right to violate anyone else’s rights. Regardless of what name one goes by – Sheriff; or Grand Juror; or District Attorney – the only rights available to investigate anyone, are those granted by law (including, warrants and orders granted on motion, by the court).

    Certainly, this includes prying into someone’s records, where such conduct is prohibited by law.

  55. Free Speech

    jbjd // June 17, 2010 at 3:06 pm

    It is a WASTE OF TIME to even read any of your erroneous posts, much less comment on them.

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/02/winning-against-obots-and-astroturfers.html

  56. Free Speech

    o the Lawyer said…
    To further clarify the point: If you live in a County with a Conservative Constitutionalist Attorney General, by all means see if you can get the Attorney General’s cooperation in presenting your criminal information against BO & his co-conspirators to the Grand Jury, i.e., you don’t need to bypass the Attorney General if he is on your side, the side of Our Constitution.
    March 31, 2009 1:58 PM

  57. Free Speech

    Leo the Lawyer said…
    To further clarify the point: If you live in a County with a Conservative Constitutionalist Attorney General, by all means see if you can get the Attorney General’s cooperation in presenting your criminal information against BO & his co-conspirators to the Grand Jury, i.e., you don’t need to bypass the Attorney General if he is on your side, the side of Our Constitution.
    March 31, 2009 1:58 PM

  58. Pingback: Joseph Cari sentenced, Blagojevich Rezko Obama Biden ties, Cari pressured by Stuart Levine, John Harris and Alonzo Monk await sentencing | Citizen WElls

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s