Philip J Berg Injunction Application denied, Justice Souter denied, Pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, December 9, 2008

Philip J Berg’s  Injunction Application was denied by Justice Souter on Tuesday, December 9, 2008. Mr. Berg’s petition for a Writ of Certiorari is still pending.

The Right Side of Life website has been doing a good job of keeping track of all the lawsuits. Thanks to them.

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/

No. 08-570  
Title:
Philip J. Berg, Petitioner
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed: October 31, 2008
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  Case Nos.: (08-4340)
  Rule 11
~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008 Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008 Application (08A391) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J. Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 Application (08A391) denied by Justice Souter.
Nov 18 2008 Waiver of right of respondents Federal Election Commission, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 1 2008 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by respondent Bill Anderson.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A505) for an injunction pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 Application (08A505) denied by Justice Souter.
 

 


~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~    ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:    
Philip J. Berg 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 (610) 825-3134
  Lafayette Hill, PA  19444-2531  
Party name: Philip J. Berg
Attorneys for Respondents:    
Gregory G. Garre Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
  United States Department of Justice  
  950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.  
  Washington, DC  20530-0001  
Party name: Federal Election Commission, et al.
     
Lawrence J. Joyce Lawrence J. Joyce LLC (520) 584-0236
  1517 N. Wilmot Rd., #215  
  Tucson, AZ  85712  
  barmemberlj@earthlink.net
Party name: Bill Anderson

26 responses to “Philip J Berg Injunction Application denied, Justice Souter denied, Pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of certiorari, December 9, 2008

  1. Not surprising. My firm belief is that the SCOTUS will do nothing to preempt a potential crisis, but WILL act when a crisis occurs. They will not address something that has not yet occurred, however, when the electoral college has voted and obama is the president-elect, THEN the issue of unqualified is real. If this farce makes it to Jan 8, then the issue is truly a crisis. It is at that time that I will expect the Justices to do their duty. Have Faith.

  2. Steve A, I completely agree. The fact is that the Constitution says that the PRESIDENT cannot be anything other than a natural born citizen. Obama is not the president, in fact, he is currently unemployed.

    He is not yet the president-elect either. Not until January 8th which is when the Supreme Court can step in. I think they will do it under the wire. I think Chief Justice Roberts, on January 9th, will ask Obama for his proofs because he needs them in order to administer the oath on January 2oth.

    And if that happens, that is when the sh*t hits the fan. But I think Obama will have some kind of diversionary tactic like he did in the general election in Sept (the banking crisis, thanks to Barney Frank et al). But this time it will be some foreign thing on our soil. THAT would surely divert all attention from his birth cert. The man is truly dangerous.

  3. You people are pathetic. If there were ANY irregularity such as the one you would like to believe exists, then how was he able to obtain his security clearance to get his daily presidential intelligence briefings? Ever think about that?

  4. We think about it all the time.
    If you will do enough reading you will find out.

  5. He is getting 5-6 security briefings a day just like Bush is. It’s obvious he’s got clearance becuse he getsintelligence briefing all the time. If he wasn’t a citizen, that would never happen. Just common sense

  6. Non Sense

  7. @Janet and Steve A.

    What makes you think if the Surpeme court won’t do anything know, that they will do something later???

    When the Surpreme Court sees a case that is possibly violating the consitution, they act on it IMMEDIATLEY. Period.

    Plus, if any of the jusices felt that philip or Loe Donofrio had merit and or that the case should have been heard they would have made a comment on why the cases were denied.

    When a Court denys a case with out a opinion why, that usually means 2 things.

    Either they have no interest in the cases or that they found the case COMPLETELY with out merit.

    The Surpeme Court will act, on these cases NOW if they feel they should act on it at all.

    They are NOT going to wait untill the guy is almost inagurated to hear a case on wether he qualifies to be president. That’s just stupid.

    This recent denial of Philp berg case{including the denial of Leo Donofrio’s monday}, just indicates that the surperme court Will Not act on these cases, becuz they have NO interest and or found no merit in these case.

    Keep dreaming!

  8. According to the FBI, Elected Officials do not get background checks by the CIA, FBI, NSA, or any other GVT agencies. Since they are “Elected Officials”, it is already “Assumed” that they have been checked out. Remember, He was a Senator (Elected Official) when he was selected to be a Presidential Candidate. Everyone from the Secretary of States for ALL 50 States to the Electorial College Members said that he was Vetted by the American People when they decided to cast their Votes for him. The DNC knew this was going to happen which is why George Soro’s, David Alynski, and the DNC ran him as President.

    Funny how the American People now have NO STANDING when we question his Elegibility.

  9. Maybe we will get lucky and the Corruption in Chicago implementing Obama will be heard by the Electorial College, and they will elect John McCain and Sarah Palin for President and Vice President. I would love to see Sarah Palin as Vice President, then President in 2012. I Believe she has the Pulse of the American People and will UnSocialize Washington and our corrupt states.

  10. I just love how people defend Obama so passionately and viciously. Obama is the Democrate’s Nixon. Nixon has NOTHING on Obama. It will come out. Wait until Obama pisses someone off and doesn’t do like he is SUPPOSE to do. When he stops following orders like the good little boy he should be then they will crucify him. Can’t wait for it.

  11. http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/national/2008/12/09/rehnquist-1957-assertion-that-clerks-influenced-supreme-court-borne-out-by-new-study_print.htm

    Interesting perspective on who really rules the SCOTUS.
    Rehnquist 1957 Assertion could be the most relevant issue to the Natural Born issue.

  12. @richard.

    Keep dremming my friend .THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN. There is no evidence what so ever that obama is involed in the corruption scandal. nor have there been ANY charges againts him. keep dremming idiot. Obama WILL be sworn in as president jan. 20th 2009. AND THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GET OVER IT!!!!

    O and I would LOVE for Sarah, “you becha” Palin to try and run againt Obama in 2012. That would DEFFENTLY give Obama re-election.

    Were can I donate to her primary campaign???

    LMFAO!!!!

  13. @herewego.

    You Obama haters are hillarious, the fact you are even putting Obama and nixion in the same sentence says more about you, then it does about Obama. He’s not even made one decision as president, but yet you are comparing him to nixion. LMAO

    If any preisdent should be compaired to nixion its PREISDENT GEORGE W. BUSH.

    The corruption, fear-mogering, lies, and failers of the bush admin. will go down in history as the worst admin. IN OUR NATIONS HISTORY!!!!!!

    Im not saying this as a democrat or a republican but as an american.

    BUSH IS A DISCRACE!!!!!

    dont agree???

    There is a reason why his aproval rating is 23%.

  14. lisa.
    Do you know what the approval rating of Congress is?

  15. @citizenwells.

    Yeah and? That still didn’t stop the democrats of taking over the rest of congress and getting 58 senate seats alomost to a 60 senaye seat fillibuster now did it?

    That s what I thought.

    Better question:

    Have you seen the approval rating of Obama?

    67% according to a Wall Street Journal poll.

    Higher then President-elect Bush

    And President-elect Clinton

    http://mobile2.wsl.com/device/artical.php?CALL_URL=http://online.wsj.com/artical/SB122894997230096117.html?

  16. The electoral college has met, and Obama is the official President elect. On the heels of that, SCOTUS denied writ in the Berg case. Your argument is simply the ravings of stupidity.

  17. Jack.
    I know that it runs contrary to Obama supporters to read and be informed,
    but honestly, why don’t you try it.
    Nothing is official yet.

  18. “Nothing is official yet.”
    yes it is, Electotal College voted on Dec 15, Obama is officially elected, your “onthing is official yet” is meaningless drivel”

  19. richCares.
    You are typical of the uneducated uncaring Obama core support.
    Congress must validate.
    That may not happen.
    Obama may also be indicted before as well.
    Do some reading and give a damn!

  20. want a barrel full of “denieds” , go to Supreme Court, they have a lot of them, how many more do you nead to read to stop saying “Do some reading and give a damn!”
    http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm

    why does the person that doesn’t do actual research say “Do some reading and give a damn!”, go aahead and gives us links to valid and creditable sources

  21. Do some reading.
    Try to understand the nature of lawsuits in general and what has been
    denied and what has not.
    You may also want to devleop some critical thinking skills.

  22. Don’t understand. Why is Bill Anderson under Respondent? Philip Berg is under Petitioner, but the two cases are linked together?

    Can someone enlighten me?

  23. Bill Anderson responded with a Amicus Curiae Brief, friend of the court
    brief in support of Philip Berg’s case.

  24. Who is Larry Sinclair??
    http://www.marchreport.com

    Military not sure?? http://www.marchreport.com

    Pravda knows who Obama is.News from Russia
    who would have believed it??

  25. Did grandma pass before Obama went to Hawaii?
    another Coverup??my,my.www.marchreport.com
    Sympathy vote?? Michelle said Toots was doing well!
    Did Michelle receive a pay to play when Barack,Barry,got in the Senate ??,I read where she received a huge increase in salary like 150,to 200,000 .WOW WHAT A RAISE.Is this True??
    http://www.colony14.net/id41.html

    ,

  26. I cannot fathom why this critical matter cannot be viewed by everyone as nothing more nor less than a constititutional issue– and not a narrow, parochial, self-serving issue. Loathe most politicians and ideologues. A terribly destructive lot.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s