Obama birth certificate fake, COLB fake, Barack Obama fraud, Rod Polarik, Final Report, November 22, 2008, Forged images, phony photos, and felony fraud, Ron Polarik, PhD

Dr. Rod Polarik has been examining the COLB, Certificate of Live Birth, that the Obama camp has presented
on such sites as Daily Kos, Fight the Smears, FactCheck.org and other pro Obama sites. Here are some exerpts from Dr. Polarik’s Final Report on November 22, 2008:

“The following report is the culmination of over four months of intensive, empirical research whose sole purpose has been to determine if the images and photographs posted on the Internet are true reproductions of a genuine document purported to be Obama’s original birth certificate. The idea for the research actually began from the time when the first image was posted on June 12 to the Daily Kos blog. I don’t recall on which website I actually saw the story (most likely World Net Daily), but the news had gone viral basically from the moment that it hit the Internet.

Before seeing the image, I had no idea that Barack Obama’s birthplace was in question, or that his status as a natural-born US citizen had never been proven. Like millions of other Americans, I believed the story he told about being born in Hawaii to an American Mother (and a U.S. citizen) and an African Father (a Kenyan national attending college on a student visa). I had no idea that this issue would mushroom and take on a life of its own. What I did know, however, was that from the first time I saw the Daily Kos image, or what I now call, “Obama’s bogus birth certificate,” that something was just not right about it. As someone who has scanned hundreds of thousands of documents in his lifetime, I had a hard time accepting that this was an original scan image made from an original paper document. As Fate would have it, right then, on June 13, I was looking at the conclusive evidence that the text on this image had been graphically altered, or “manufactured,” as my first blog post would claim.

From that point onward, I had no inkling of what was to come. I had no idea that I would wind up being the only person on the Planet (at that time) to have spotted the anomalies that I knew were the by-products of intentional, graphic alteration, and to go on record as stating that the Daily Kos image was a fake. I was also not prepared for what came along with this knowledge, for what I had to endure for making it public. Basically, I had painted a big bullseye on my chest and my research findings, and the critics were now coming out of the virtual woodwork taking shots at me personally, and my research, secondly. I had started a new online game called, “Let’s pile on Polarik,” and every little error I made was magnified into a major transgression. Yet, the crux of my contention was never successfully refuted.

Now, if I had to do it all over again, I probably would not have done it at all, knowing that I’d be spending the next four months conducting further research and compiling evidence on not just the COLB image, but also the digital photographs that were to follow two months later. The personal costs to me were enormous, and I will not elucidate on them (but for those who know me, they also know what were those costs). What began as sort of a curiosity turned into my personal quest for the “Holy Grail,” so to speak. I was guided only by the need to uncover the truth, and by the constant harassment by my critics. Had they left me alone from the beginning, I probably would not be writing this report today.

I debated, long and hard, about the title of my report. Aside from it being catchy, I ran the danger of being lumped into a group of false conspiracy theorists, and brushed aside as an idiot wearing a “tinfoil hat.” (Actually, that’s already happened, many times over). Perhaps there are a lot of false conspiracies, including some really outlandish ones, but there would not be laws on the books, both at a state level and a federal level, that specifically mention the act of conspiracy when the purpose of that conspiracy is to either engage in illegal activity, engage in a cover-up of that illegal activity, or interfering with the investigation of that illegal activity. Conspiracy can involve all of these. Yet, somehow, the word, “Conspiracy,” has become a pejorative for “nutty theories from the fringe,” as if there has never been a real “conspiracy.”

Do you remember, or ever hear about, the “Watergate Conspiracy?” Do you remember, or ever hear about, what happened to President Richard Nixon as a result?

I would tell all of you who think that “conspiracies” are a joke and that the people who claim to have found them are “idiots wearing tinfoil hats,” to just ask an FBI agent what he or she thinks about “conspiracy.” Or, go ahead and ask a federal judge what he or she thinks about “conspiracy.”

“Conspiracy” is no laughing matter, ladies and gentlemen, and neither is “document fraud,” as in creating and passing a counterfeit birth certificate.

I should now alert you to the fact that I have been using the phrase, “Bogus birth certificate,” as a euphemism for “Counterfeit birth certificate,” which is defined as, “A copy or imitation of a state-issued birth certificate that is intended to be taken as authentic and genuine in order to deceive another.”

Sound familiar? According to Authenticate-360:

Birth certificates are generally used as “breeder” documents to gain other identity documents and to perpetuate fraud. But unlike Social Security cards, birth certificates are issued by hundreds, if not thousands, of entities, with little regard to consistency or security. An accurately forged birth certificate is a dangerous document, allowing the bearer significant access to everything from driver’s licenses to passports…The increasing availability and affordability of high-quality digital scanners and copiers is a constant threat to the authenticity of government issued documents.

There are current Federal laws in place that prohibit the use of false identity documents, such as a birth certificate, and they are spelled out in Chapter 18 of the United States Code, Section 1028, Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information. In particular, there are specific paragraphs that relate to the use of a false identification document:

The term “false identification document” means a document of a type intended or commonly accepted for the purposes of identification of individuals that – (A) is not issued by or under the authority of a governmental entity or was issued under the authority of a governmental entity but was subsequently altered for purposes of deceit; and(B) appears to be issued by or under the authority of the United States Government, a State, a political subdivision of a State, a foreign government, a political subdivision of a foreign government, or an international governmental or quasi-governmental organization.

What you are about to read in this report are well-documented facts arising from evidence collected over a period of four months and subjected to intense scrutiny and empirical evaluation. Given the overriding fact that the individual whose identity document is in question, has repeatedly failed to provide a genuine identity document, the charge that this individual, along with other individuals, did conspire to proffer in its place, a false identification document, is hereby levied by the American people, by way of one of its citizens. To summarize the seriousness of these actions and this charge, and to the importance of what is contained within this report:

There is conclusive and irrefutable evidence that the COLB image created and distributed by Obama’s campaign to the Daily Kos, Annenberg’s Factcheck, and the St. Pete Times, Politifact, is, unquestionably, a false identification document. Furthermore, there is conclusive and irrefutable evidence that the photos taken by Annenberg’s Factcheck, in collusion with the Obama campaign, are themselves, false identification documents, having been made from the same false identification document image, as well as from additional false identification documents created for the same purpose; namely, to proffer these false identification documents as true reproductions of a genuine, Hawaii-issued and certified, “Certification of Live Birth” document, and thereby, intentionally deceive the American public into believing that Barack Hussein Obama is a natural-born citizen of the United States, and thereby, fully qualified to become their President.

I never imagined that my studies would amount to this. I thought, like most Americans, that maybe the information was accurate even though the document image was fake. I thought, like most Americans, that Obama would simply present a copy of his real, original birth certificate, and that would be that. Yet, here we are, more than twenty months after Obama announced his candidacy for the Presidency, and nearly three weeks after the election, and Obama still refuses to show his real birth certificate!

Sadly, mainstream media have totally ignored this inconvenient truth and are not even been willing to even look at this birth certificate issue. They are all still in-the-tank with Obama, but even more so now that he is in line to be President. They all bought into the lies and fraudulent documents proffered up as evidence on Obama’s qualifications. They have been too quick to label as “trash” or “garbage” any legitimate questions asked about Obama’s real birth certificate. Even thigh-ranking governmental officials in the state of Hawaii where Obama was allegedly born, won’t reveal what’s on Obama’s original birth certificate. All they have said is that they have it. They have not said (1) where Obama was born. (2) when Obama was born, or (30 even to whom Obama was born.

The answer to “What’s on Barack Obama’s real, original birth certificate” ranks right up there with some of the great mysteries of our time — and that is really hard to swallow. That a man, with a dubious background, has been elected to the highest office of the greatest superpower in the world without ever having to prove who he says he is! That is not “nutty,” that’s just plain insane!

With all that said, and without further ado, I present to you my final and complete report on Barack Obama’s bogus birth certificate, The Born Conspiracy.”

Read the rest of the report here:


7 responses to “Obama birth certificate fake, COLB fake, Barack Obama fraud, Rod Polarik, Final Report, November 22, 2008, Forged images, phony photos, and felony fraud, Ron Polarik, PhD

  1. Well now i’m seeing on Lans website that they believe this is a fraud??? I can’t tell what’s real or not anymore…lol…this is just crazy !!!


  2. Citizen Wells,
    It looks very seriously as if all atempts to apply to Obama that very basic legal principle “Same Rules Apply” will be blocked. Obviouslt the threat of civil unrest is enough to convince the establisment that the rules do not apply to Sidi Obama.

    It’s time to return I think to a suggestion I gave you a while ago, that a campaign of passive resistance to bring Washington D.C. and other major cities to a standstill might deliver a reminder that more than half of Americans did not vote for the “President – elect” and make people who matter sit up and take notice.

    One of the main points about this type of campaign is that protesters must stay within the law. Don’t block the highways of a city but drive very slowly (i.e. well under the legal speed limit) thus causing gridlock.

    Bombard the courts with legitimate request for information and follow up standard responses with requests for clarification.

    Overwhelm public offices by querying everything in great detail.

    And of course advise the supreme courts that the action will continue until Sidi Obama’s credentials are properly examined in the context of the consitution.

    It can work, it has worked in Britain on much less constitutionally vital issues. And as both you and Jeff Schreiber have commented on how lessons must be taken from the Obama campaign on how to use new media, here is a chance to outmanouvre them.

    Take it from me, the Obama campaign did not use the net particularly well, what they did was use the age old approach of making problems disappear by burying them under a pile of money. The web factor in the election lay in the Republicans using internet technologies particularly badly.

    A few well read blogs could easily start a nationwide juggernaut.

    best regards,
    Ian Thorpe

  3. Thanks Ian.
    I just got off of the phone with a state official in another state. I have been active starting before the general election in informing the public as well as state officials of the law and holding all accountable. The state laws vary widely, but some, aside from constitutional and federal laws, have laws on the books to provide for challenges.

  4. CW, as someone whi I guess works in a legal profession I can understand your preference for going through proper legal channels. Remember though, when the legal channels had been exhausted in 1776 the United States of America was created by direct action. My Grandad (born Utica NYS, 1884) used to tell me that. Although he only lived in Utica until he was seven or eight before family circumstances forced a return to Britain he was always American at heart.

    Good luck with the challenges but if they fail there is still a month in which to go down the direct route.

  5. Rod Polarik is a phony, not the birth certificate.

    In his #1 assertion that the birth certificate is a fake, he says there is an issue with the consistency of color between the pixels on the outside of the letters and the color of the pixels on the inside of the letters. He says they are green on the outside and white/grey on the inside and therefore it would appear that text from another document was placed on top of someone else’s birth certificate.

    Mind you, this is his #1 assertion. However, if you actually pay attention to the video you will see that when he shows the sample from Obama’s birth certificate the pixels on both the outside AND inside are grey/white. There is no inconsistency.

    Secondly he relies on the fact that while the borders are from 2007, the stamp and seal are from 2008. However, he never shows us these supposed 2008 markings. Why? Because they don’t exist. Look at the images and you will clearly see the stamp is dated 2007. Admittedly, the seal is essentially impossible to read in all the images.

    When someone is claiming to be an expert and produced an expert report, but makes serious errors as I have pointed out, their entire “investigation” needs to be called into question.

  6. harriet.
    What is your position on Obama?
    Polarik is not running for president.
    Why is Obama avoiding the issue and not providing legal proof regarding his eligibility.
    Instead of putting up different versions of suspect BC, why not provide them to the court instead of using legalese and legal posturing.

  7. :: raises hand :: ooooo I know the answer to the question!!!

    BHO doesn’t want anyone to know WHATS behind his real birth. Whether he was adopted (we won’t go into all that stuff, it’s hard enough for those that can’t understand the simple part of this); WHO is his father (that’s a real ‘?’ – it could be Davis); WHERE he was actually hatched (yes, people : we KNOW that his mother (he looks nothing like her either for my .02 on the topic) is a US citizen, HOWEVER she was unable to convey her citizenship to him since she was NOT old enough, per the laws on the books at the time of his birth.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s