Tag Archives: Obama not eligible

Obama on Ohio ballot, Warren County judge to rule, Obama not eligible, Constitutional crisis, David Neal lawsuit

Barack Obama is not eligible to be president and a Warren County Ohio resident, David Neal, has filed a lawsuit to remove Obama from the ballot. Here are some exerpts from a Dayton Daily News article:

“Judge to rule on local man’s attempt to kick Obama off ballots

By Justin McClelland

Staff Writer

Thursday, October 30, 2008

LEBANON — A Warren County judge will decide whether Sen. Barack Obama’s name can appear on Ohio election ballots after listening this morning, Thursday, Oct. 30, to a Turtlecreek Twp. man who claims that the Democratic presidential candidate is not a U.S. citizen and cannot be elected president.

David Neal appeared in Warren County Common Pleas Court after filing a lawsuit on Friday. Neal wants a court order to remove Obama’s name from ballots to be used in the general election on Tuesday, Nov. 4.

Neal claims Obama was not born in the United States and cannot be president because the U.S. Constitution allows only native-born citizens to be elected to that post.

“We’re facing a constitutional crisis,” Neal said this morning in court. “Until we get to the bottom of this, there’s going to be disenfranchisement.””

Read more here:

http://www.daytondailynews.com/n/content/oh/story/news/local/2008/10/30/ws103008obamasuit.html

Help Philip J Berg defend the Constitution:

http://obamacrimes.com

Obama not eligible, Constitutional crisis, Philip J Berg lawsuit, Electoral College meeting, Obama not natural born citizen

The Philip J Berg lawsuit that states that Obama is not eligible to be president was dismissed by Judge Surrick last week. Howver, the lawsuit is still alive in the appeals court and will be submitted to the US Supreme Court tomorrow, October 30, 2008. Mr. Berg is trying to prevent a constitutional crisis. Jeff Schreiber has an article that explains what may happen:

 

“Obama Must Stand Up Now or Sit Down
By Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr.
NewsWithViews.com

America is facing potentially the gravest constitutional crisis in her history. Barack Obama must either stand up in a public forum and prove, with conclusive documentary evidence, that he is “a natural born Citizen” of the United States who has not renounced his American citizenship—or he must step down as the Democratic Party’s candidate for President of the United States—preferably before the election is held, and in any event before the Electoral College meets. Because, pursuant to the Constitution, only “a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of th[e] Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President” (Article II, Section 1, Clause 4). And Obama clearly was not “a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of th[e] Constitution.”

Whether the evidence will show that Obama is, or is not, “a natural born Citizen” who has never renounced his American citizenship is an open question. The arguments on both sides are as yet speculative. But Obama’s stubborn refusal to provide what he claims is “his own” country with conclusive proof on that score compels the presumption that he knows, or at least strongly suspects, that no sufficient evidence in his favor exists. After all, he is not being pressed to solve a problem in quantum physics that is “above his pay grade,” but only asked to provide the public with the original copy of some official record that establishes his citizenship. The vast majority of Americans could easily do so. Why will Obama not dispel the doubts about his eligibility—unless he can not?
Now that Obama’s citizenship has been seriously questioned, the burden of proof rests squarely on his shoulders. The “burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States * * * is upon those making the claim.” Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640, 653 (1948). And if each of the General Government’s powers must be proven (not simply presumed) to exist, then every requirement that the Constitution sets for any individual’s exercise of those powers must also be proven (not simply presumed) to be fully satisfied before that individual may exercise any of those powers. The Constitution’s command that “[n]o Person except a natural born Citizen * * * shall be eligible to the Office of President” is an absolute prohibition against the exercise of each and every Presidential power by certain unqualified individuals. Actually (not simply presumptively or speculatively) being “a natural born Citizen” is the condition precedent sine qua non for avoiding this prohibition. Therefore, anyone who claims eligibility for “the Office of President” must, when credibly challenged, establish his qualifications in this regard with sufficient evidence.”

Read more here:

http://www.americasright.com/

Help Philip J Berg defend the Constitution:

http://obamacrimes.com

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Fox news, US Supreme Court, Standing, New York Fox News, Obama not eligible

Philip J Berg has been interviewed by the Fox News Channel in New York. Mr. Berg discussed the interview, his lawsuit stating that Obama is not eligible to be president and the US Supreme Court with Jeff Schreiber. Here are some exerpts:

“I spoke with Philip Berg this afternoon as he sat in his office, awaiting a crew from Fox News Channel in New York. While interest in his lawsuit among those at Fox has been steadily mounting over the past few days and weeks, Berg does not know exactly in what capacity the end product of the taping will be used.

“At this point,” Berg said, “the nation just needs to know that Mr. Obama is not eligible to serve as president of the United States, that he has so far successfully hidden behind procedure, and that we could very well be headed toward a constitutional crisis unless this is addressed.”

And he is indeed working toward ensuring that the issue is addressed, Berg said, and has been spending the past few days preparing for his appeal to the United States Supreme Court, a move which could happen by the end of the week. This, of course, has caused him to shift other items to the proverbial back burner, including but not limited to the so-called Michelle Obama tapes purportedly possessed by editorial staff at African Press International.”

“In the unlikely event, though, that four of the nine Supreme Court Justices decide to hear the case, Berg will first have to establish that, contrary to the arguments put forth by Barack Obama and the DNC and the specifics of the decision rendered by the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick, he indeed has standing to sue. As I’ve pointed out in these pages before, the standing doctrine as it stands today does not bode well for Philip Berg.

To have standing, a plaintiff must satisfy a three-prong test. He or she must prove (1) injury in fact, (2) causation, and (3) redressibility — that they’ve sustained more than just general harm, that the harm can be traced to the conduct of the defendant, and that adjudication of the matter can provide a remedy to that harm. Berg’s biggest hurdle, so far, has been establishing injury in fact.”

“In the past, the United States Supreme Court has held that a plaintiff must have a “personal stake” in the matter being adjudicated. This, of course, is to ensure that the matter belongs before the court in the first place. More recently, however, the Court has paid greater attention to, and awarded standing for, plaintiffs who can show enough of an injury so as to provide something along the lines of a good contest among legal rivals.”

Read more here:

http://www.americasright.com/

Help Philip J Berg defend the Constitution:

http://obamacrimes.com

Obama removal, Obama not eligible, Obama Indonesian, Philip J Berg lawsuit, Andy Martin investigation, Hawaii Supreme Court, US Constitution, Logan Act, Jerome Corsi, Obama removed soon

The burden of proof in court cases can be very difficult to achieve.
Philip J Berg has a lawsuit filed August 21, 2008 that states that Obama
is a citizen of Indonesia and not eligible to be president. The lawsuit
is alive, has entered a new phase and according to Mr. Berg, will be
taken to the US Supreme Court if necessary. Up until now, Obama has
not been vetted by the DNC or the MSM. However, the truth about the
real Obama is slowly emerging. The DNC and state election boards have
been in control of the election process. Citizen Wells contacted the
NC Board of elections and discovered that they were aware of the Berg
lawsuit and stated that they got their cues from the DNC. However, there
is a watermark of vetting that is in place and supersedes state law and
election traditions. The US Constitution. As we work our way through the
election process, the US Constitution and Federal Election Laws will
factor more in the determination of eligibility.

There are several “show stoppers” in the limelight today regarding Barack
Obama, his eligibility, judgement and associations. Here are some of the
prominent controversies:

  • The Philip J Berg lawsuit states that Obama is Indonesian and not eligible to be president. A reliable source just indicated a ruling is imminent. According to Jeff Schreiber, “Because Barack Obama and the DNC failed to answer or object to his request for admissions within the mandatory 30-day period, Berg says, the admissions are admitted by default”
  • Andy Martin, a journalist, writer and investigator, has been in Hawaii
    for several days and has filed a request with the Hawaii Supreme Court to access Obama’s birth records.
  • Obama is traveling to Hawaii, allegedly because of his Grandmother’s
    health. However, due to Obama’s consistent pattern of deception and
    lies, coupled with the Berg lawsuit and Martin investigation, many are
    questioning Obama’s motives.
  • Jerome Corsi, author of “ObamaNation”, was in Kenya recently and deported by the Kenyan government. Mr Corsi returned with new evidence of the agenda of Obama’s cousin Raila Odinga and the ODM party and Obama’s meddling in Kenyan affairs. Obama was criticized by the Kenyan government for his 2006 trip to Kenya.
  • New revelations surface each day of Obama’s strong ties to William Ayers, a domestic terrorist, and Acorn, which is currently embroiled in voter fraud investigations in numerous states.
  • Tony Rezko is talking and all the people indicted as a result of the Rezko trial and investigations have connections to Obama. FBI mole. John Thomas, refuted Obama’s earlier claims that he did not have much contact with rezko.
  • Obama was not vetted by the DNC or MSM. However, as the election proceeds, various participants in the process will be held to the standard of upholding the Constitution. The Citizen Wells blog will provide more on this in the coming days.

So, which of these controversies and events will put an end to the deception
by Obama and the DNC. The collective wisdom of the founding fathers
impresses me more than ever. Will the safeguards put in place many years
save this country. If we follow their lead, the country will survive.

Support Philip J Berg and the US Constitution:

http://obamacrimes.com

Visit the Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Philip J Berg, Filing October 21, 2008, Immediate Order, Request for Admissions, Obama not Eligible, DNC must replace Obama

Here is the main part of Philip J Berg’s filing today, Tuesday, October 21, 2008. The complete filing will be available later:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE, ::

Plaintiff

 

:

vs.

 

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-cv-04083-

RBS

:

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, a/k/a :

BARRY SOETORO, a/k/a :

BARRY OBAMA, a/k/a : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

BARACK DUNHAM, a/k/a :

BARRY DUNHAM, THE :

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL :

COMMITTEE, THE FEDERAL :

ELECTION COMMISSION AND :

DOES 1-50 INCLUSIVE, :

Defendants

 

:

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION REQUESTING AN IMMEDIATE ORDER DEEMING

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS, BARACK

HUSSEIN OBAMA and THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE,

ADMITTED

NOW COMES

 

the Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire [hereinafter “Plaintiff”] and

respectfully requests this Honorable Court to grant Plaintiff’s Motion and issue an

immediate Order deeming Plaintiff’s Requests for Admissions, served upon Defendants,

Barack Hussein Obama [hereinafter “Obama”] and The Democratic National Committee

[hereinafter “DNC”] on September 15, 2008 “Admitted” on the following Grounds:

1. Plaintiff filed this action on August 21, 2008 requesting Declaratory and

Injunctive Relief, as Obama does not meet the qualifications or eligibility to run

for and/or serve as the President of the United States.

2. On or about September 9, 2008, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Expedited

Discovery, Extensive Discovery and Depositions of Obama and Howard Dean,

Chairman of the DNC and the appointment of a Special Master. Defendants

never Responded to or Opposed said Motion. This Motion is still pending.

3. On September 15, 2008, Defendants, Obama and the DNC, were served

with discovery by Plaintiff for Request for Admissions and Request for

Production of Documents. Defendants’ responses were due within thirty [30]

days.

4. Defendants, Obama and the DNC did not Answer the Complaint, failed to

turn over proof of Obama’s citizenship status and instead filed a Motion to

Dismiss on September 24, 2008. Defendants claimed Plaintiff did not have

standing to bring this action and failed to state a claim which relief could be

granted.

5. This Honorable Court requested Plaintiff to file any Responses in

Opposition to Defendants Motion within five [5] days, that being on or before

September 29, 2008 and Plaintiff complied by filing a Response in Opposition to

Defendants Motion to Dismiss.

6. On or about Monday, October 6, 2008, Defendants Obama and the DNC’s

Attorney called Plaintiff requesting Plaintiff to agree to Staying discovery

pending a decision on their Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff declined as Obama’s

citizenship status is of National security as he is running for President of the

United States.

7. In the afternoon of October 6, 2008, Defendants, Obama and DNC, filed a

Motion for Protective Order staying all discovery pending the Court’s decision on

their Motion to Dismiss. In their Motion Defendants acknowledged receipt of the

Requests for Admissions.

8. On or about October 9, 2008, Plaintiff filed his Response in Opposition to

Defendants Motion for Protective Order.

9. Defendants have failed to timely Answer Plaintiff’s Requests for

Admissions, which were served on September 15, 2008 and Defendants Answers

were due thirty [30] days thereafter. Therefore, these matters are automatically

deemed admitted in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 36(a).

McNeil v. AT&T Universal Card

 

, 192 F.R.D. 492, 494 (E.D. Pa. 2000),

Goodman

v. Mead Johnson & Co

 

., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S.

1038, 97 S. Ct. 732 (1977); Siss

 

v. County of Passaic

, 75 F. Supp. 2d 325, 331

(D.N.J. 1999).

10. No order staying discovery has been entered in this forum. Because the

proceedings in this matter have not been stayed, and because the Defendants,

Obama and DNC, failed to timely Answer Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions,

they have been deemed admitted in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, Rule 36(a).

11. Plaintiff has diligently prosecuted his case. Accordingly, Plaintiff

requests an Order deeming Plaintiff’s First Request for Admissions to Defendant

Obama numbered 1-56 and to Defendant DNC numbered 1-27 Admitted.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: October 21, 2008 s/ Philip J. Berg

Philip J. Berg, Esquire

Attorney in

 

Pro Se

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

Identification No. 09867

(610) 825-3134″

Philip J Berg’s website:

http://obamacrimes.com

 

Charlotte Observer, WBT radio, Charlotte, NC, Obama free ride, Media failure, Philip J Berg Lawsuit, Obama not eligible, Obama Indonesian, Jeff katz, Hold media accountable

American citizens hold the media accountable


This morning I kicked off a campaign to hold the American media accountable. I requested all citizens contact their local newspaper, TV stations as well as national media such as Hannity and Colmes on Fox. The media has given Barack Obama a free ride and has not covered many of the important stories about him. I decided to keep things simple and ask the media why they have not covered perhaps the biggest story of the century, the Philip J Berg lawsuit that states that Obama is ineligible to be
president. Mr. Berg states primarily that irrespective of where Obama
was born, that he is still an Indonesian citizen. Obama, instead of providing a vault copy of his birth certificate or pledge of allegiance to the US, has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. John McCain provided a vault copy to congress.

First some encouragement. An Ohio Fox affiliate interviewed Mr. Berg.
Watch the video:

Ohio Fox affiliate interviews Philip J Berg

Since I try to practice what I preach, I have been contacting media in NC.
For my first effort in this project, I am going to concentrate on the
largest city in NC, Charlotte.

Good news and bad news in Charlotte, NC:

First the good news. WBT radio has done a pretty good job of exposing
the real Obama. Jeff Katz has done the best job at WBT and has covered
the Philip J Berg lawsuit.

I salute WBT radio and Jeff Katz for informing the public.

Now for the bad news in Charlotte, NC:

Not only has the Charlotte Observer not covered Obama, they, in a
disgusting show of uncaring partisan politics, endorsed Obama months
ago. The bias of the Chalotte Observer is evident every day.

So, call or write the Charlotte Observer and ask why they endorsed
Obama without checking him out and why they have not covered important
news about Obama, especially the Philip J Berg lawsuit. If the
answer you receive does not impress you, reconsider your subscription
to the Observer. Also, contact the advertisers of the Observer. Explain
your concerns and that you will boycott their product if the Charlotte
Observer continues their agenda.

The Charlotte Observer has gone through waves of layoffs in the past few
years. Apparently they do not understand what their job is and who they
are supposed to serve. 
 

Although the NC Board of Elections is not the media, I contacted them
recently regarding the Philip J Berg lawsuit. I emailed them several
times and spoke to them once over the phone. I received no response
to my emails. The gentleman I spoke to had been aware of the lawsuit
for several months. He was hesitant to let me talk and instead of
really listening, mentioned the John McCain lawsuit that challenged
his citizenship. That lawsuit was dismissed.

I am putting the NC Board of Elections on notice that the people of NC
are watching. The Berg lawsuit has merit and also we are not going
to tolerate voter fraud.

Contact the media in your area and nationally and voice your concerns.

Support Philip J Berg and the lawsuit