Category Archives: Secretary of State

Mark Brnovich AG of Arizona et al v DNC  et al Oral arguments before SCOTUS March 2, 2021, ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting

Mark Brnovich AG of Arizona et al v DNC  et al Oral arguments before SCOTUS March 2, 2021, ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

 

From Prescotte Enews March 1, 2021

“The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) will review a case challenging Arizona’s election integrity laws concerning ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting.

In 2016, Arizona passed HB 2023 to restrict ballot harvesting in Arizona unless the person collecting the ballot is a family member, a person living in the same household, or a caregiver. Since the 1970s, Arizona has required people to vote at their specific precinct.

General Brnovich intervened on behalf of Arizona after the Secretary of State refused to defend the measures.

The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) is asking SCOTUS to bring clarity to these matters after a misguided ruling by the Ninth Circuit struck the measures down.”

Read more:

https://prescottenews.com/index.php/2021/03/01/ballot-harvesting-brnovich-v-dnc/

Us Supreme Court

TUESDAY, MARCH 2, 2021
CASES FOR ARGUMENT TODAY

Tuesday, March 2
(2)
BRNOVICH V. DNC
ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY
V. DNC
(Consolidated – 1 hr. for argument)

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_calendars/MonthlyArgumentCalFebruary2021.pdf

No. 19-1257
Vide 19-1258

Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners
v.
Democratic National Committee, et al.

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

“QUESTIONS PRESENTED
Arizona, like every other State, has adopted rules
to promote the order and integrity of its elections. At
issue here are two such provisions: an “out-ofprecinct policy,” which does not count provisional ballots cast in person on Election Day outside of the
voter’s designated precinct, and a “ballot-collection law,” known as H.B. 2023, which permits only certain persons (i.e., family and household members,
caregivers, mail carriers, and elections officials) to handle another person’s completed early ballot. A majority of States require in-precinct voting, and
about twenty States limit ballot collection.
After a ten-day trial, the district court upheld these provisions against claims under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the Fifteenth Amendment. A
Ninth Circuit panel affirmed. At the en banc stage, however, the Ninth Circuit reversed—against the urging of the United States and over two vigorous
dissents joined by four judges.

The questions presented are:
1. Does Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act?

2. Does Arizona’s ballot-collection law violate
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act or the Fifteenth Amendment?”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1257/142431/20200427105601341_Brnovich%20Petition.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

 

Attorney Lin Wood SCOTUS conference March 5, 2021 Petition for a writ of Mandamus, “expose the massive, coordinated election fraud that occurred in the 2020 General Election”

Attorney Lin Wood SCOTUS conference March 5, 2021 Petition for a writ of Mandamus, “expose the massive, coordinated election fraud that occurred in the 2020 General Election”

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“I have also received credible evidence of serious wrongdoing by high-ranking
government officials which I have brought to the attention of the public and to federal law enforcement officials. The evidence of wrongdoing includes evidence of potentially serious crimes perpetrated by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.”...Attorney Lin Wood affidavit

“The oral testimonies of witnesses on December 3, 2020, and subsequently, the written testimonies submitted by many others, provide ample evidence that the 2020 Georgia General Election was so compromised by systemic irregularities and voter fraud that it should not be certified.”…Georgia Senate report December 17, 2020

 

FROM THE SCOTUS, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

No. 20-887

In re L. Lin Wood, Jr.

Distributed for conference of 3/5/2021

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-887

Dec 30 2020     Petition for a writ of mandamus

“The Georgia Legislature has plenary authority to set the “Times, Places
and Manner” of Federal Elections and has clearly set forth the procedures to be
followed in verifying the identity of in-person voters as well as mail-in absentee ballot voters. The Georgia Secretary of State usurped that power by entering into a Settlement Agreement with the Democratic Party earlier this year and issuing an “Official Election Bulletin” that modified the Legislature’s clear procedures for verifying the identity of mail-in voters. The effect of the Secretary of State’s
unauthorized procedure is to treat the class of voters who vote by mail different from the class of voters who vote in-person, like Petitioner. That procedure dilutes the votes of in-person voters by votes from persons whose identities are less likely to verified as required by the legislative scheme. The Secretary’s unconstitutional modifications to the legislative scheme violated Petitioner’s Equal Protection rights by infringing on his fundamental right to vote. The Eleventh Circuit has held that Petitioner does not have standing to chall enge State action that dilutes his vote and infringes upon his constitutional right to Equal Protection. The questions presented are:”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-887/165104/20201230211038462_Emergency%20Petition%20for%20Writ%20of%20Mandamus.pdf

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Trump v Wisconsin SCOTUS conference March 5, 2021 Petition for a writ of certiorari, “did count, tens of thousands of invalid absentee ballots”

Trump v Wisconsin SCOTUS conference March 5, 2021 Petition for a writ of certiorari, “did count, tens of thousands of invalid absentee ballots”

“¶23 The plain language of Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2)(a) requires
that each elector make an individual assessment to determine
whether he or she qualifies as indefinitely confined or disabled
for an indefinite period. A county clerk may not “declare” that
any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic. This
conclusion is supported by two distinct, but equally important,
reasons.”…Wisconsin Supreme Court

“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question.   From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8

 

From the SCOTUS, United States Supreme Court

No. 20-883

Donald J. Trump v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, et al.

from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Distributed for conference of 3/5/2021

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-883

Dec 30 2020 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed.

“After Election Day, Respondents encouraged the
counting of, and did count, tens of thousands of invalid absentee ballots received in violation of the “mandatory” requirement of Wis. Stat. § 6.84(2) that absentee ballots “in contravention of the [specified statutory absentee balloting] procedures…may not be counted.”
The foregoing raises the following questions:
1. Whether WEC and local election officials violated Art. II, § 1, cl. 2 of the United States Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of
Equal Protection during the 2020 Presidential election by implementing unauthorized absentee voting practices in disregard of the Wisconsin Legislature’s explicit command that absentee voting must be “carefully regulated” and absentee ballots cast outside of the Legislature’s authorized procedures “may not be counted”?

2. Whether this Court should declare the Wisconsin election unconstitutional and void under Article II and thus failed under 3 U.S.C. § 2 and allow the Wisconsin Legislature to appoint its electors?

3. Whether federal courts may rely on the doctrine of laches to avoid reviewing Electors Clause or Equal Protection claims arising after absentee balloting began or which could not have reasonably been brought before absentee balloting commenced?

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-883/165018/20201230144119028_20-___PetitionForWritOfCertiorari.pdf

From the Wisconsin Legislature January 4, 2021.

January 4, 2021 – Introduced by Representative Allen.

    ***AUTHORS SUBJECT TO CHANGE***

Relating to: addressing election law violations.
Whereas, in the United States, the power to govern is given by the people
through the process of democratic elections. It is by this process that our government obtains legitimacy; and
Whereas, we have three branches of government, and the legislative branch,
consisting of duly elected representatives of the people, is the branch charged with the power to write the laws. It is through this process that our government maintains legitimacy; and
Whereas, when the executive branch or administrative agencies charged with
enforcing the laws instead choose to step outside of the law, or go beyond the law, or stretch the law to something other than what is written, the legitimacy of the government begins to erode; and
Whereas, the 2020 election and the recount of the results of the presidential
election have brought to light a number of areas in which the letter of the law is not being followed. Those circumstances of departure from the letter of the law include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Clerks provided absentee ballots to electors without applications, as
required by Wis. Stat. § 6.86.
2. Clerks and deputy clerks authorized by the municipal clerk failed to write
on the official ballot, in the space for official endorsement, the clerk’s initials and
official title, as required by Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (1).
3. Clerks issued absentee ballots to electors who were required to enclose a copy
of proof of identification or an authorized substitute document, but who failed to do so under Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (1).
4. Clerks failed to enter initials on ballot envelopes indicating whether the
elector is exempt from providing proof of identification, as required by Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (2).
5. Clerks in Milwaukee and Dane Counties declared electors in their counties
to be “indefinitely confined” under Wis. Stat. § 6.86 (2), causing chaos and confusion, and failed to keep current the mailing list established under that subsection; more than 215,000 electors thus avoided identification requirements and safeguards that the legislature has established.
6. Clerks and the boards of canvassers permitted absentee ballots returned
without the required witness address under Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (2) to be counted in
contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (6d).
7. Clerks who received absentee ballots with improperly completed certificates
or no certificates filled in missing information in contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (9).

8. The Wisconsin Elections Commission, in contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.875,
barred special voting deputies from entering qualified nursing homes and assisted living facilities, instead mailing ballots to residents directly, thereby avoiding safeguards the legislature put in place to protect our most vulnerable citizens and loved ones.
9. The clerk of the City of Madison ignored Wis. Stat. § 6.855 and created an
event named “Democracy in the Park” and, of her own accord, designated alternate sites where absentee ballots could be collected; these ballots were counted in contravention of Wis. Stat. § 6.87 (6); and
Whereas, without legitimacy, the government of the people, by the people, and
for the people shall not stand. Instead, our government will devolve into a system of coercion and bribery that seeks to use the guise of elections to hold a degree of credibility; and
Whereas, the people of Wisconsin are demanding that the legislature address
questions of legitimacy; now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the assembly, That: the Wisconsin State Assembly recognizes
that the most important function for a government is to conduct fair and honest
elections that follow the duly enacted law; and, be it further
Resolved, That when there are significant portions of the population that
question the integrity of the elections due to the failure of election officials to follow the letter of the law, it is incumbent upon the legislature to address the issues that are in question; and, be it further
Resolved, That the members of the Wisconsin State Assembly place the
redress to these and other election law violations and failed administrative procedures as its highest priority and shall take up legislation crafted to ensure civil officers follow the laws as written.

https://citizenwells.com/2021/01/05/wisconsin-legislature-2021-assembly-resolution-3-introduced-january-4-2021-redress-to-these-and-other-election-law-violations-and-failed-administrative-procedures/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

 

Sidney Powell: “There is enough evidence ….. to more than reverse the election in at least five states.”, “Dominion… not allowing inspection of the voting machines”, “massive election fraud”

Sidney Powell: “enough evidence ….. to more than reverse the election in at least five states.”, “Dominion… not allowing inspection of the voting machines”, “massive election fraud”

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

“These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”…Thomas Paine

 

Massive Election Fraud

From GateWay Pundit

“Sidney Powell LIVE: “There Is More than Enough Evidence in the Public Now to More than Reverse the Election in at Least 5 States” “

“Sidney Powell had this to say to open the conversation. “Well, Erskine from my perspective it looks like the complete breakdown of every institution of law enforcement and the rule of law that we have trusted in this country since its inception to protect the law and the citizens from abuses by the government.

As far as the last election Sidney Powell had this to say, “There’s all kind of precedent for fixing what happened in this election from Bush vs. Gore to other cases as well… Fractionalized votes. That’s exactly what we have here from a computer algorithm that we can prove in multiple counties and it could prove across the country if anybody would issue an order allowing inspection of the machines. The very fact that Dominion and other companies are not allowing inspection of the voting machines ought to tell everybody all they need to know. Federal law calls for election records to be kept for 22 months… In this case it requires forensic evaluations of the machines and looking at all of the paper ballots. We already know that’s not going to match up. There were counterfeit ballots. People were saying, “Oh, well they did a full audit in Georgia.” Well, if you just keep running the same counterfeit bill through the same counting machine you’re going to get the same result.

Sidney then dropped this bomb, “There is enough evidence in the cases before them or enough evidence in the public now to more than reverse the election in at least five states.”

Read more:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/sidney-powell-live-enough-evidence-public-now-reverse-election-least-5-states-video/

 

Dump

Twitter

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Windham NH election recount update Zoom meeting Monday March 1, 2021, Windham Incident, Dominion Voting machines count off by 14 percent in one race

Windham NH election recount update Zoom meeting Monday March 1, 2021, Windham Incident, Dominion Voting machines count off by 14 percent in one race

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident:  Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

 

From Granite Grok

“STAY ENGAGED! The “Windham Incident” Selectman’s Meeting – Monday, March 1 at 7p”

“We must have a complete and thorough analysis and audit of the November 3, 2020 election. We must determine the cause of the largest discrepancy of vote tallies between election day and a hand recount.

I believe strongly that the audit must be held in Windham under the supervision of Windham town government.  I also believe the NH AG and SOS must be a part of the process to bring their expertise and oversight, but at an “arms length” involvement – as I believe there is a strong perceived conflict of interest by residents across the state – including myself.

With that in mind, I worked with David Strang and Senator Bob Giuda to put together an Audit Procedures draft proposal to present to the Board of Selectmen.  There must be input from town, election officials and the public – to flush out and clearly define a step by step process that would be followed in order to ensure a truly thorough and transparent audit that no one could question once completed.

Please make a statement and join the meeting. You don’t have to talk, just being there sends the message that this is important to you… that you care about our Republic, and that you will not sit idly by while our state government officials do nothing. Your presence will speak volumes!

You can attend in person at Windham High School, 64 London Bridge Rd, Windham 03087, or you can attend via Zoom (details below).

Town of Windham is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.

Topic: Board of Selectman Public / Virtual Meeting

Time: Mar 1, 2021 07:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada)

Join Zoom Meeting”

Read more:

https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/2021/02/stay-engaged-the-windham-incident-selectmans-meeting-monday-march-1-at-7p

Citizen Wells February 26, 2021

“The Monitor dismissed the unexplained errors as insignificant and called the concerns “a conspiracy.”

The governor also emphasized that the discrepancy was small in size and tried to extinguish cries of a conspiracy.

It was the largest UNEXPLAINED ELECTION DISCREPANCY in the history of New Hampshire!

Not a conspiracy. An indisputable fact! We don’t know WHY there are voting count discrepancies nor WHERE they occurred. These concerns are shared by NH Senator Bob Giuda in these Op-Eds; “The Windham Incident – Election Results vs Recount Totals” and “The Windham Incident Deception“.

“The fact that we can get granular and focus on one or maybe two machines, or hand-counting 300 individual votes, I think that speaks to the immense integrity of our system,” Sununu said.

To be clear, it was not “300 individual votes” that are in question. The recount discovered errors totaling 1,363 votes from 10,006 ballots cast in the State Rep race. That does not reflect “immense integrity of our system.”  Those errors were for only one race.  We should recount the other races as well

“And the incredible accuracy. Through all of the different communities in the state, we’re talking about one or two machines in one community.”

No Governor. If it turns out the voting machines were the cause of defective election results in Windham – then we won’t be talking about “incredible accuracy” and just “one or two machines in one community.”

We’ll be talking about ALL OF THE MACHINES THAT ARE USED IN 85% OF NEW HAMPSHIRE!”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/26/windham-nh-dominion-voting-machines-count-off-by-14-percent-in-one-race-governor-sununu-downplays-machines-used-in-85-of-new-hampshire/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Dump

Twitter

 

Arizona real audit of 2020 election to begin after months delay by crooked Maricopa officials?, Scanned ballots and full forensic audit of equipment and software

Arizona real audit of 2020 election to begin after months delay by crooked Maricopa officials?, Scanned ballots and full forensic audit of equipment and software

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

“Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.”...Common sense

 

After months of delays by crooked Maricopa election officials, a real audit of scanned ballots and full forensic audit of ballot tabulation equipment, the software for that equipment and the election management system should begin immediately after a judge clarified already established law.

“The Court finds that that Subpoenas are legal and enforceable. There is no question that the Senators have the power to issue legislative subpoenas. The Subpoenas comply with the statutory requirements for legislative subpoenas. The Senate also has broad constitutional power to oversee elections. The Arizona legislature clearly has the power to investigate and examine election reform matters. Accordingly, the Senators have the power to subpoena material as part
of an inquiry into election reform measures. As such, the Subpoenas have a proper legislative purpose.27 The Subpoenas also do not violate separation of powers principles. Production of the subpoenaed materials would not violate confidentiality laws.”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/27/arizona-judge-thomason-ruling-senate-also-has-broad-constitutional-power-to-oversee-elections-will-az-lead-the-nation-in-election-results-clarity-and-reform/

Details of the forensic audit are provided in the following subpoenas provided in court documents.

Scanned ballot audit

https://citizenwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/maricopasubpoena15.pdf

Full Forensic audit

https://citizenwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/maricopasubpoena11.pdf

https://citizenwells.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/maricopasubpoena12.pdf

https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=2032

 

Will Arizona lead the nation in election integrity?

Arizona SOS Katie Hobbs and Gov Ducey celebrate as they prematurely certify the votes while the Nov 30 election hearing was taking place.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

 

Arizona Judge Thomason ruling: “Senate also has broad constitutional power to oversee elections.”, Will AZ lead the nation in election results clarity and reform?

Arizona Judge Thomason ruling: “Senate also has broad constitutional power
to oversee elections.”, Will AZ lead the nation in election results clarity and reform?

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

“The Arizona Legislature should immediately march in to Maricopa County, secure the ballots, and with the aid of appropriate law enforcement, arrest anyone obstructing justice.”...Citizen Wells

 

The state legislatures have plenary power over elections.

This supersedes that of the US Supreme or any other court.

Rudy Giulianni, Attorney Jenna Ellis and constitutional experts explained this to the state legislatures during recent election hearings.

It has once again been clarified in an Arizona courtroom by Judge Timothy Thomason in Maricopa County v Karen Fann, et al.

“The Court finds that that Subpoenas are legal and enforceable. There is no question that the Senators have the power to issue legislative subpoenas. The Subpoenas comply with the statutory requirements for legislative subpoenas. The Senate also has broad constitutional power to oversee elections. The Arizona legislature clearly has the power to investigate and examine election reform matters. Accordingly, the Senators have the power to subpoena material as part
of an inquiry into election reform measures. As such, the Subpoenas have a proper legislative purpose.27 The Subpoenas also do not violate separation of powers principles. Production of the subpoenaed materials would not violate confidentiality laws.”

https://media.kjzz.org/s3fs-public/CV2020-016840-901-02252021.pdf

The Arizona Legislature has a duty and obligation to the citizens of AZ as well as the United States to verify the accuracy of the 2020 election and prepare for the accuracy and legality of future elections.

 

Arizona SOS Katie Hobbs and Gov Ducey celebrate as they prematurely certify the votes while the Nov 30 election hearing was taking place.

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

 

 

 

 

 

https://media.kjzz.org/s3fs-public/CV2020-016840-901-02252021.pdf

Arizona judge rules in favor of senate Feb 26, 2021, Maricopa ballots may be accessed for real audit, Evidence on the machines still there?, Ballots intact?

Arizona judge rules in favor of senate Feb 26, 2021, Maricopa ballots may be accessed for real audit, Evidence on the machines still there?, Ballots intact?

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

“The Arizona Legislature should immediately march in to Maricopa County, secure the ballots, and with the aid of appropriate law enforcement, arrest anyone obstructing justice.”...Citizen Wells

 

An Arizona judge has just ruled in favor of the senate.

The ballots may now be accessed for a real audit.

Is the evidence on the voting machines still there?

Are the ballots intact?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tghCgVtbozA

From Citizen Wells February 23, 2021.

ARIZONA STATE SENATOR SONNY BORRELLI INTERVIEW

Three things stand out:

  1. Concerns about evidence tampering.
  2. Republican Senator Paul Boyer is good friends with the Maricopa Board of Supervisors and wants to protect them.
  3. The senate is requesting a Grand Jury Investigation.

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/23/arizona-2020-election-update-feb-23-2021-senator-borrelli-interview-paul-boyer-close-friends-with-maricopa-board-evidence-on-the-machines-still-there-ward-v-jackson-denied/

Arizona SOS Katie Hobbs and Gov Ducey celebrate as they prematurely certify the votes while the Nov 30 election hearing was taking place.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

 

 

Windham NH Dominion Voting machines count off by 14 percent in one race, Governor Sununu downplays, Machines used in 85% of New Hampshire

Windham NH Dominion Voting machines count off by 14 percent in one race, Governor Sununu downplays, Machines used in 85% of New Hampshire

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident:  Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

 

From Granite Grok February 26, 2021.

“Many across America and as far away as Australia (go to 12:07), are aware of the “Windham Incident” – NH’s blatant disregard for election integrity.

The disturbing debacle was created by Gov. Sununu, his Attorney General and Secretary of State (SOS) due to their lack of a meaningful investigation into the disturbing and questionable results produced by Windham’s voting machines.”

“The Monitor dismissed the unexplained errors as insignificant and called the concerns “a conspiracy.”

The governor also emphasized that the discrepancy was small in size and tried to extinguish cries of a conspiracy.

It was the largest UNEXPLAINED ELECTION DISCREPANCY in the history of New Hampshire!

Not a conspiracy. An indisputable fact! We don’t know WHY there are voting count discrepancies nor WHERE they occurred. These concerns are shared by NH Senator Bob Giuda in these Op-Eds; “The Windham Incident – Election Results vs Recount Totals” and “The Windham Incident Deception“.

“The fact that we can get granular and focus on one or maybe two machines, or hand-counting 300 individual votes, I think that speaks to the immense integrity of our system,” Sununu said.

To be clear, it was not “300 individual votes” that are in question. The recount discovered errors totaling 1,363 votes from 10,006 ballots cast in the State Rep race. That does not reflect “immense integrity of our system.”  Those errors were for only one race.  We should recount the other races as well

“And the incredible accuracy. Through all of the different communities in the state, we’re talking about one or two machines in one community.”

No Governor. If it turns out the voting machines were the cause of defective election results in Windham – then we won’t be talking about “incredible accuracy” and just “one or two machines in one community.”

We’ll be talking about ALL OF THE MACHINES THAT ARE USED IN 85% OF NEW HAMPSHIRE!”

Read more:

https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/2021/02/the-windham-incident-never-let-a-good-crisis-go-to-waste

 

Ignoring evidence of election fraud because the election is already over is like ignoring a murder because the victim is already dead.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells

 

Windham New Hampshire retains Dominion Voting machines for audit, AG office rescinds notice, “Windham Incident” causes public outcry

Windham New Hampshire retains Dominion Voting machines for audit, AG office rescinds notice, “Windham Incident” causes public outcry

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,”  “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident:  Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

 

From GateWay Pundit February 26, 2021

“After Public Pressure New Hampshire AG’s Office Rescinds Plan to Move Voting Machines to State Capitol for Investigation”

“In the lead-up to the planned House vote this week, the AGs office, in a surprise move Monday, notified the town of Windham of their intent to take possession of the 4 voting machines, owned by the town and its citizens, even before the legislative process had been completed.  The bill hasn’t passed and therefore is not even ready for signature by the Governor.  Why is the AG suddenly so anxious to take possession of these machines?  After the change in the scheduled vote and swift public outcry to this planned removal of the machines, the AGs office rescinded this notice yesterday.  

As this audit is being done to reassure the citizens of Windham that their machines indeed operated properly on Nov. 3rd and that their votes were counted accurately, it is felt by most involved that this Windham audit should be done in front of its citizens, not in the distant State capital of Concord.  It makes no sense to subject sensitive electronic machinery to needless transport in winter and then leave them unattended in Concord, rather than locked in a secure vault in the town, which has ownership of the devices.  In following with this sentiment, town officials indicated they would likely refuse to unlock the vault and allow this apparent confiscation of their machines.
To those advocating for this long-delayed investigation, it is clear the AGs office has lost the trust of the people to whom it is accountable, the citizens of not just Windham, but New Hampshire.  They have clearly demonstrated their office to be an unwilling participant in this audit process and disrespectful to the rights of the citizens.  SB43 is currently scheduled to be heard in the House Election Law Committee on March 5 at 10:30 am.  Concerned citizens of the State should contact Committee members to urge support for this bill.”
Read more:

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://mewe.com/i/citizenwells

https://gab.com/citizenwells

https://rumble.com/user/CitizenWells