Arizona AG Mark Brnovich motion to file Amicus in Texas v Pennsylvania US Supreme Court Dec 9, “resolve this challenge quickly to give the Nation certainty”
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official
“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis
From the Arizona AG Mark Brnovich
Motion to file Amicus in
STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF WISCONSIN
“The State of Arizona and Mark Brnovich, Arizona Attorney General
(collectively, the “State of Arizona”) respectfully move for leave to file a brief as
amici curiae respecting the motions for leave to file a bill of complaint and for a
preliminary injunction in this case. See Sup. Ct. R. 37.2(a). If granted leave, the
State of Arizona’s brief will make two primary points.1
The State of Arizona will first argue that election integrity is of paramount
importance. “Every voter” in a federal election “has a right under the Constitution to have his [or her] vote fairly counted, without its being distorted by fraudulently cast votes.” Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211, 227 (1974). Given this paramount importance, the State of Arizona, through its Attorney General, vigilantly fights to ensure election integrity, including for the 2020 election. The Attorney General participated in eight different suits to defend from attack Arizona election laws that were enacted by its Legislature. Indeed, in just a few months, the State of Arizona and its Attorney General will appear before this Court in the critical case of Brnovich et al. v. Democratic National Committee et al., No. 19-1257, and urge the Court to adopt a construction of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act that not only follows the text of that statute but also recognizes that to ensure “fair and honest” elections marked by “order, rather than chaos,” “there must be a substantial regulation of elections.” Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 (1974) (emphasis added); see also Smiley v. Holm, 285 U.S. 355, 366 (1932) (“[E]xperience shows” those “necessary” regulations include not just voting “procedure[s]” but also “safeguards”
for the “prevention of fraud and corrupt practices.”).
The State will also argue that if this Court exercises jurisdiction over Texas’s
complaint, it is equally important that the Court act quickly to give the Nation
certainty.”
Trump Motion to Intervene Texas v Pennsylvania et al Dec 9, 2020, Attorney John Eastman, Bill of Complaint in Intervention against PA et al
“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official
From the Donald Trump
Motion to Intervene in
STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF WISCONSIN
And
Bill of Complaint in Intervention
“Our Country is deeply divided in ways that it arguably has not been seen since the election of 1860.There is a high level of distrust between the opposing
sides, compounded by the fact that, in the election just held, election officials in key swing states, for apparently partisan advantage, failed to conduct their state
elections in compliance with state election law, in direct violation of the plenary power that Article II of the U.S. Constitution confers on the Legislatures of
the States. Indeed, a recent poll by the reputable Rasmussen polling firm indicates that 47% of all Americans (including 75% of Republicans and 30% of Democrats), believe that it is “likely” or “very likely” the election was stolen from the current incumbent President.1”
“In the 2020 election, under the guise of responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, election officials in several key states, sometimes on their own and sometimes in connection with court actions brought by partisan advocates, made a systematic effort to weaken measures to ensure fair and impartial elections by creating new rules for the conduct of the elections—rules that were never approved by the legislatures of the defendant states as required by Article II of the
United States Constitution. These new rules were aimed at weakening, ignoring, or overriding provisions of state law that are aimed at ensuring the integrity of the voting process.
As more particularly alleged in the Bill of Complaint filed by the State of Texas, for the first time in history, these officials flooded their States with millions of ballots sent through the mail, or placed in drop boxes, with little or no chain of custody and, at the same time, intentionally weakened or eliminated the
few existing security measures protecting the integrity of the vote—signature verification and witness requirements.”
Coffee County Georgia cannot certify electronic recount, “To demand certification of patently inaccurate results neither serves the objective of the electoral system nor satisfies the legal obligation”
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official
“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections
In the letter, election officials said they could not certify the electronic recount numbers given its “inability to repeatably duplicate creditable election results.”
“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,” officials wrote in the letter. “To demand certification of patently inaccurate results neither serves the objective of the electoral system nor satisfies the legal obligation to certify the electronic recount.”
Along with the letter, Coffee County elections officials also sent Raffenserger’s office a document that “illuminates that the electronic recount lacks credibility.” Election officials also said that no election board has the ability to “reconcile the anomalies” that are shown in that document.
“Accordingly, the Coffee County Board of Elections and Registration have voted to certify the votes cast in the Election Night report,” the letter states. “The Election Night numbers are reflected in the official certification of results submitted by our office.””
Texas v Pennsylvania et al US Supreme Court states must respond by 3 PM Dec 10, Allen West: LA AL AR FL KY MS SC SD likely to join, Sekulow explains
“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official
From the US Supreme Court.
Dec 07 2020
Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint filed.
Response to the motion for leave to file a bill of complaint and to the motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order or, alternatively, for stay and administrative stay requested, due Thursday, December 10, by 3 pm.
STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, AND STATE OF WISCONSIN
“MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER OR,
ALTERNATIVELY, FOR STAY AND
ADMINISTRATIVE STAY”
“CONCLUSION
This Court should first administratively stay or
temporarily restrain the Defendant States from
voting in the electoral college until further order of
this Court and then issue a preliminary injunction or
stay against their doing so until the conclusion of this
case on the merits. Alternatively, the Court should
reach the merits, vacate the Defendant States’ elector
certifications from the unconstitutional 2020 election
results, and remand to the Defendant States’
legislatures pursuant to 3 U.S.C. § 2 to appoint
electors.
December 7, 2020 Respectfully submitted,
Ken Paxton*
Attorney General of Texas”
Landry: Louisiana Is Joining Texas’ 2020 Election Lawsuit
“Millions of Louisiana citizens, and tens of millions of our fellow citizens in the country, have deep concerns regarding the conduct of the 2020 federal elections. Deeply rooted in these concerns is the fact that some states appear to have conducted their elections with a disregard to the U.S. Constitution. Furthermore, many Louisianans have become more frustrated as some in media and the political class try to sidestep legitimate issues for the sake of expediency.
Weeks ago, on behalf of the citizens of Louisiana, my office joined many other states in filing a legal brief with the United States Supreme Court urging the Justices to look into the conduct of the election in Pennsylvania where their state court ignored the U.S. Constitution in regard to the conduct of the election. The U.S. Constitution in Article 1, Section 4, states plainly: “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature …” The power for the conduct of federal elections is held by the State Legislatures in each state. In states like Pennsylvania, the judicial branch attempted to seize control of these duties and obligations and to set their own rules. These actions appear to be unconstitutional. If it is unconstitutional for Pennsylvania to take this action, it is similarly unconstitutional for other states to have done the same.
Only the U.S. Supreme Court can ultimately decide cases of real controversy among the states under our Constitution. That is why the Justices should hear and decide the case which we have joined representing the citizens of Louisiana.
Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court should consider the most recent Texas motion, which contains some of the same arguments.
Louisiana citizens are damaged if elections in other states were conducted outside the confines of the Constitution while we obeyed the rules.”
Dominion Voting Systems documented fraud, Antrim County MI real time & post election tests, 22 machine results due tomorrow?, Ware County GA
“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official
The following is a summary of major events leading up to, during and after the 2020 Election involving concerns and documented fraud tied to Dominion Voting Systems in multiple states.
As you read the following, Dominion executive Eric Coomer stated the following shortly before the election:
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”
That has to be taken seriously!
Pre Election.
Texas tested Dominion for the third time and reported their rejection in February 2019.
“Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, said they decided not to go with Dominion software for vote counting in the 2020 election, as they had recognized there were problems with it, and it couldn’t be trusted.”
“Texas Dominion Voting Systems testing and evaluations report dated February 15, 2019.
“Re: Inspection of the Dominion Voting Systems’ Democracy Suite 5.5 conducted on January 16 and 17, 2019″
“Why on earth would we buy less-secure machines that are opposed by the voters, opposed by national security experts, at risk of being decertified right now in New York, are far more expensive than the hand-marked paper ballots, are possibly going to be decertified by the national election authorities within 2-4 years, when we’re spending, taking out a 20-year bond,” Parent said. “You start saying, ‘Why on earth would we buy these things?’
“I have been baffled, absolutely baffled. This is not a partisan issue — you don’t do voting machines on a party-line vote. This is crazy. And so I’m like, what is going on here? I’ve been given absolutely no good reason why we should buy these things. There’s not one good reason. So therefore, it just reeks of corruption — that we’re prioritizing vendors over voters.”
Colonel Phil Waldron and his team of white hat techies were monitoring the election real time and collected data confirming the Dominion Voting Systems equipment was communicating with off shore sites and performing in such a way as to reveal data manipulation.
The following is his presentation in the Michigan hearing from December 1, 2020. He elaborates on what transpired in Antrim County and his revelations contradict the official narrative we were given.
Post Election.
Ware County Georgia:
“
Robb Hurst, CPA
@robbhurstCPA
·
Ware County, Ga has broken the Dominion algorithm: Using sequestered Dominion Equipment, Ware County ran a equal number of Trump votes and Biden votes through the Tabulator and the Tabulator reported a 26% lead for Biden.”
“ROBERT W. HURST, JR.CPA, BUSINESS OWNER
Robb graduated from the University of Georgia with both, his Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting, 1989, and Master of Taxation, 1990. He began his career in public accounting in 1991 at the national accounting firm KPMG Peat Marwick in Greenville, SC. In 1992, after the death of his dad’s partner, Robb and his wife Lorna journeyed home to Douglas, GA to work with Robert Hurst, Sr., until his retirement in 2004, at Hurst & Hurst CPAs, LLC.
Robb specializes in dealing with the accounting and tax problems of small businesses and their owners. He has extensive experience in the retail, restaurant, construction, healthcare and other professional industries. Other areas in which he exceeds the expertise of most is his in depth knowledge of accounting and auditing procedures and financial reporting requirements for government and nonprofits.”
Antrim County Michigan Dominion audit.
It is concerning that any test conducted now will be subject to scrubbing or altering of data and equipment.
“Sheriff asks judge to block Michigan order for clerks to delete election data”
“Michigan Attorney Gives Behind the Scenes Update on the IT Inspection of the Antrim County Dominion Machines
On November 16, several members of the MI State legislature sent a letter to Michigan’s Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson requesting that a full, independent audit of the accusations prior to the certification of the vote. This was after reviewing hundreds of sworn affidavits by GOP and Independent poll challengers and evidence of vote switching by Dominion voting machines in Antrim County, Michigan. The radical Secretary of State, who has a problem with telling the truth, ignored their request.
On November 23, Matthew DePerno of DePerno Law Offices, LLC filed a lawsuit on behalf of Central Lake resident William Bailey, demanding Antrim County allow a forensic investigation of the Dominion voting machines after it was discovered that thousands of ballots cast for President Trump were counted as votes for Joe Biden.”
“At 5:30 PM on Friday, December 4, 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A. Elsenheimer granted permission to William Bailey and his team of IT experts to conduct a forensic study of the 16 Dominion voting machines, tabulators, thumb drives, related software, and the Clerk’s “master tabulator.” In his court order, Bailey was also granted the ability to conduct an independent investigation of the images they obtained in their examination. According to DePerno, it would take approximately 6 to 8 hours to obtain the forensic copies, and it made sense to do the work on the weekend when most government employees and residents would not be in the building.”
“Mr. DePerno expects to have the results of the study sometime tomorrow. He explained the forensic images of the thumb drives and the master computer would tell if machines were connected to the internet—and if they were, who were they communicating with? DePerno said the examination would be able to determine the algorithms used by the computer and will provide the number of ballots read through the machine compared to the actual number of paper ballots.”
Citizen Wells has serious concerns about the current Antrim County audit due to the elapsed time after the election and the distrust of Dominion and election officials.
Thank God Colonel Waldron and his team monitored the election real time and did a follow up on site evaluation in Antrim County.
Arizona Republicans call to decertify vote watch live rally Dec 7, Legislature to close for week due to Covid-19, Demand to audit voting machines
“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show
“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State
“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis
LIVE: Arizona Republicans call for decertification of election results
“The Arizona Supreme Court has agreed to review an appeal in the Arizona GOP’s lawsuit seeking to overturn the state’s election results.
The Arizona Supreme Court has agreed to review an expedited appeal in the Arizona Republican Party’s efforts to overturn the state’s election results.
Arizona GOP Chair Kelli Ward filed an appeal late Friday after Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Steven Warner dismissed her lawsuit regarding duplicate ballots. Ward claimed that errors with duplicated ballots offer proof that the election should be overturned and the state’s 11 Electoral College votes should go to President Donald Trump.
Gabriel Sterling just admitted fraud & criminal scanning of ballots without observers, Sterling is complicit, Georgia Secretary of State press conference
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling
“The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”…Shakespeare
It is illegal to scan and process ballots without observers.
Gabriel Sterling just admitted that ballots were scanned without observers at the Georgia Secretary of State press conference that just happened.
He is responsible for the election proceedings and is complicit in the coverup.
He should be arrested.
He is a liar and apparently a criminal.
Citizen Wells has been reporting the irregularities and apparent fraud in Georgia for weeks.
However, this morning it was discovered what Gabriel Sterling’s true motivation is.
Gabriel Sterling anti Trumper exposed in Tweets, 2016: ” This must be about stopping Trump”, #NeverTrump, Blames everyone but himself & Dominion
Mr. Sterling has had a credibility issue from day one and that has gotten worse.
Now we have evidence that he is an anti Trumper.
From GateWay Pundit.
“THIS EXPLAINS A LOT: CORRUPT GEORGIA ELECTIONS OFFICIAL GABRIEL STERLING IS UNHINGED #NEVERTRUMPER WHO TWEETED OUT NASTY ATTACKS ON DONALD TRUMP
Gabriel Sterling is a very unhinged and corrupt top elections officials in Georgia.
On Thursday when video was produced showing far left criminals dragging out hidden “suitcases” of ballots to count in the State Farm Center after they removed all GOP observers Sterling tried to claim this was standard operating procedure.”
“What is he hiding?
AND NOW THERE IS PROOF THAT STERLING HAD IT OUT FOR TRUMP. WE KNOW THIS BECAUSE HE TWEETED ABOUT IT.
In February 2016 Sterling tweeted out that Trump must be stopped!”
And in April 2016 Gabriel Sterling admitted he was #NeverTrump
Gabriel Sterling anti Trumper exposed in Tweets, 2016: ” This must be about stopping Trump”, #NeverTrump, Blames everyone but himself & Dominion
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling
“The lady doth protest too much, methinks.”…Shakespeare
Follow the money.
Starting with the Georgia decision to purchase the Dominion Voting Systems package in 2019 for $ 107 million.
Citizen Wells has reported about the widespread issues in the 2020 Georgia elections for weeks.
At the center of much of the controversy was Gabriel Sterling. The COO under Secretary of State Raffensperger and in charge of the operation of the elections.
Mr. Sterling has had a credibility issue from day one and that has gotten worse.
Now we have evidence that he is an anti Trumper.
From GateWay Pundit.
“This Explains a Lot: Corrupt Georgia Elections Official Gabriel Sterling is Unhinged #NeverTrumper who Tweeted Out Nasty Attacks on Donald Trump
Gabriel Sterling is a very unhinged and corrupt top elections officials in Georgia.
On Thursday when video was produced showing far left criminals dragging out hidden “suitcases” of ballots to count in the State Farm Center after they removed all GOP observers Sterling tried to claim this was standard operating procedure.”
“What is he hiding?
And now there is proof that Sterling had it out for Trump. We know this because he tweeted about it.
In February 2016 Sterling tweeted out that Trump must be stopped!”
And in April 2016 Gabriel Sterling admitted he was #NeverTrump
Georgia election fraud evidence presented to SOS for verification? added to lawsuits, Matt Braynard Voter Integrity Project: more than enough to flip GA
“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit.”…Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit
“Voter Integrity Project Leader Matt Braynard to Submit Absentee Vote Findings to Georgia Case
Evidence of voter fraud gathered by Voter Integrity Project (VIP) will be submitted to the Georgia lawsuit and four other contested states. VIP was started by Matt Braynard, the former Data Chief and Strategist for Trump for President, after widespread distrust in absentee ballots arose following the 2020 election results.
Braynard has stated in multiple interviews that VIP findings are enough to flip states.
Friday, Braynard shared that his work would also appear in cases in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona. He stated that he will appear in person to discuss his Arizona-related findings during the Arizona hearing.
Braynard created VIP to conduct an independent investigation, putting off a scheduled family vacation immediately following Election Night.
Over the course of several weeks, VIP called absentee ballot voters in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Wisconsin. Team members relied on voter registration public records to ask individuals to verify that they’d requested and returned a ballot.”
“Braynard summarized some of his findings in a public video published last week. His research found that anywhere from 18 to 44 percent of those respondents listed as having requested absentee ballots reported not requesting the ballots. Additionally, his team found sizable numbers of respondents who reported having returned their ballots – though the state didn’t count them.
Braynard stated that they’d also discovered respondents who reported not voting, though they were listed as having voted. Further, their team learned that some individuals were reported as having voted in certain states – despite having moved.
Braynard mentioned that he has signed several declarations for cases across the country.”
Trump Wisconsin election challenge lawsuit filings raise questions, Wis. Stat. § 9.01 (2017–18): “these actions should be filed in the circuit court”, Why not filed there?
“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question. From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8
Citizen Wells has a good fundamental knowledge of how the court system works and interacts.
Over half of the state statutes have been read and they have a common thread of election challenge avenues and remedies.
When the Trump Wisconsin lawsuit was first filed with the Wisconsin Supreme Court there was some head scratching.
From The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel December 3, 2020.
“The state Supreme Court rejected a request Thursday by President Donald Trump to revoke the certification of his loss to Democrat Joe Biden.
The 4-3 decision left room for Trump to bring a new challenge to the election results and the president quickly did so. But the high court’s ruling provided a serious setback for him because even some of the dissenting justices signaled they do not support Trump’s call for throwing out hundreds of thousands of ballots.
Conservative Justice Brian Hagedorn and the court’s three liberals declined to take the case he filed directly with them because state law requires election challenges like his to be filed in circuit court.
“We do well as a judicial body to abide by time-tested judicial norms, even — and maybe especially — in high-profile cases,” he wrote. “Following the law governing challenges to election results is no threat to the rule of law.””
“All parties seem to agree that Wis. Stat. § 9.01 (2017–18)1
constitutes the “exclusive judicial remedy” applicable to this claim. § 9.01(11). After all, that is what the statute says. This section provides that these actions should be filed in the circuit court, and spells out detailed procedures
for ensuring their orderly and swift disposition. See § 9.01(6)–(8). Following this law is not disregarding our duty, as some of my colleagues suggest. It is following the law.”
The next filing was also confusing to observers and to U.S. District Judge Brett Ludwig.
From Boston.com December 5, 2020.
Judge calls Trump request in Wisconsin lawsuit ‘bizarre’
“I have a very, very hard time seeing how this is justiciable in the federal court,” Ludwig, a Trump appointee, said. “The request to remand this case to the Legislature almost strikes me as bizarre.”
““It’s a request for pretty remarkable declaratory relief,” said U.S. District Judge Brett Ludwig during a conference call to set deadlines and a hearing date. Ludwig, who said it was “an unusual case, obviously,” also cast doubt on whether a federal court should be considering it at all.
“I have a very, very hard time seeing how this is justiciable in the federal court,” Ludwig, a Trump appointee, said. “The request to remand this case to the Legislature almost strikes me as bizarre.”
The judge questioned why Trump wasn’t going directly to the Legislature if he wants lawmakers to get involved with naming electors.”
Citizen WElls 