Category Archives: Science

Science

Jill Stanek, Obama lies about Abortion, Babies not persons, Fox News, Obama lies, Jerome Corsi, David freddoso, Obama Abortion stance

“But, he argues, we cannot legally recognize them as “persons.”
Because if we do, then somewhere down the road it might threaten someone’s right to an abortion.”
David Freddoso on Obama

Jill Stanek, the nurse that held the new born left to die after a failed abortion attempt and Jerome Corsi, author of “Obama Nation” were interviewed on Fox News, “Hannity and Colmes.” Both Stanek and Corsi stated that Obama lied about his position and votes on abortion laws.

Jill Stanek has a website and she has an article out that reveals that Obama is the one that has lied and not those questioning Obama. Here are some exerpts:

“Indeed, Mr. Obama appeared to misstate his position in the CBN interview on Saturday when he said the federal version he supported “was not the bill that was presented at the state level.””

“Little did Obama know his own words would so quickly condemn him. He admitted what he did “defies common sense and it defies imagination.” In fact, it was heinous.

While the Obama campaign tonight finally admitted Obama has misrepresented his Born Alive vote all these years, it had the audacity to offer a ludicrous excuse, an excuse Obama himself contradicted only 24 hours ago, as he has for years, that “I would have been completely in, fully in support of the federal bill that everybody supported.””

Read more from Jill Stanek here:

http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/08/breaking_news_o.html

 

The Citizen Wells blog has several articles regarding Obama’s position and record on Abortion:

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/the-case-against-barack-obama-abortion-live-birth-david-freddoso-obama-lies-lobbyists-control-obama-babies-not-persons-to-obama-obama-deeds-obama-words-obama-a-christian/

 

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/08/19/obama-abortion-joseph-mengele-nazi-final-solution-david-freddoso-the-case-against-barack-obama-obama-pro-abortion-non-persons-illinois-senate-bill-playing-god-pro-abortion-candidate/

 

Make sure your voice is heard. Visit the Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Obama abortion agenda, Unborn baby can’t vote, Obama’s extreme position, Zach Jones is Home article, Throw The Baby Out With The Bathwater

Zach Jones is Home has a new article about Obama, abortion and Obama’s extreme position on abortion. Obama is trying to appeal to middle America but much of his past is documented.

Jill Stanek, a registered delivery-ward nurse testified before the U.S. Congress in support of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. Stanek said, “I brought pictures in and presented them to the committee of very premature babies from my neonatal resuscitation book from the American Pediatric Association, trying to show them unwanted babies were being cast aside. Babies the same age were wanted!”

“And those pictures didn’t faze him [Obama] at all,” she said.

Here are some exerpts from the article:

“It seems that Senator Obama is described as having one of the most extreme positions that one can find when it comes to the issue of abortion. In this article, I want to briefly investigate the issue of abortion and determine where Senator Obama is regarding this issue within the context of the protecting rights of the mother and the developing baby.”

“However, I do want to consider shifting some of the meaning of terminology that is always used with this issue – fetus and viability. It seems to me that given how far today’s science and medicine have advanced since 1973 when Roe v. Wade was decided, I would hope that we can consider taking a deeper look regarding what science might be able to tell us in terms of the development of the fetus. Instead of primarily addressing the question in terms of viability of the fetus, why not first try to answer the question of when the emergence of a human consciousness or behavior begins? Then perhaps that could that be the starting point where the State’s opposing interests begin to collide?”

 
“I suspect that Senator Obama’s after the fact defense of his votes against the Illinois bill were nothing more than political pandering for votes of the worst kind. Women can vote and a fetus can’t. It’s kind of like his statement that if he had been in the Senate when the Iraq war resolution was taken up he would have definitely voted against it. His words appear only to be, “Just Words”, words for political advantage.”

“Again, the main stream media lets Senator Obama have a pass. Just the way they have regarding serious allegations surrounding his associations with Rezko, Wright, Ayers, Farrakhan and the many other questionable characters in his life. The media is just now starting to cover the John Edwards scandal, only because they can’t avoid it. However, they continue to avoid like the plague, the allegations of Larry Sinclair that he and Senator Obama used cocaine and engaged in consensual gay sex in 1999.”

Read the rest of this great article here. It is filled with facts and may shock you:

http://zachjonesishome.wordpress.com/2008/08/02/obama-would-evidently-throw-the-baby-out-with-the-bathwater/

Whitehouse.com news conference, Larry Sinclair, polygraph test, polygraph test deception, examiner Ed Gelb, phony PHD

 Dan Parisi of whitehouse.com is holding a news conference immediately after Larry Sinclair’s news conference on Wednesday, June 18, 2008. This was a last minute addition to the Press Club schedule. It does not take a rocket scientist to discern their motives. Dan Parisi of whitehouse.com set up a lie detector test for Larry Sinclair back in February. Sinclair and Parisi had an agreement, a contract.

Here are the major points regarding the Polygraph test results and contract dispute:

Polygraph tests are inherently unreliable.

Sinclair passed the automated test.

Ed Gelb, the operator who evaluated the results claims to be a PHD. He obtained his “doctoral degree” from an unaccredited, mail-order diploma mill.

Dan Parisi/whitehouse.com did not fulfill their contractual obligation.

This series of events has been misquoted and twisted to smear Larry Sinclair and reduce his credibility.

So, why did Dan Parisi choose the same day for his news conference as Larry Sinclair’s news conference……..hmmmm.

I will followup with more details soon.

 

 

   
Event Name: Sinclair Polygraph 
   
Time: 5:00 PM 
Event Type: News Conference 
Sponsored by: WHITEHOUSE.COM Inc. 
Event Location: Lisagor Room 
Details:  
Contact: Dan Parisi
dparisi@garden.net
  Outlook Reminder

Gas prices, oil refineries, global warming, polar bears, environmental wackos, economy

Always follow the money.

We all want a clean environment. Most of us want a healthy economy, jobs and gasoline to get to our jobs. There are some, mostly environmental wackos, that typically don’t have to work for a living. They get government money, non profit money, live with mommy & daddy or just generally bum off of people. They don’t care how high gas price go, or if you can even get it. They don’t have to work for a living.

So, wondering why gas prices are going up? Number 1 reason. Lack of refining capacity. This already existing problem was exacerbated by Hurricane Katrina. Refining capacity was reduced approximately 20 % or more. We are still trying to recover from that. Secondly, we are not using our reserves. Alaska has a huge amount of oil.

So, what is hampering our oil production. Environmental wackos. Let’s take Alaska for example. Of course, they always bring up environmental impact. But they also bring up animals like polar bears and whales. They use pseudo science of global warming and terms like may and could cause. They consistently use false data and science. I hear talk of polar bears becoming extinct almost every day when in fact their numbers have increased. Alleged receding ice will fundamentally have no impact on their numbers. 

So, when you fill up with gas, remember who is causing the problem, who only cares about fictitious polar bear issues and could care less about you.

For more information, visit these links:

http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/story/steven_foley/2008/02/02/alaska_oil_drilling_polar_bears_and_idiot_environmentalists

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0921/p11s02-usec.html

http://www.reason.org/commentaries/moore_20050901.shtml

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,152922,00.html

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/steo/pub/contents.html

John Coleman, Weather Channel Founder, Sue Al Gore, Carbon Credits, Fox News, Rush Limbaugh

John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, thinks Al Gore should be sued for misrepresenting the impact of carbon dioxide, CO2, and selling carbon credits. Here is an exerpt from Fox News about his recent statement:

“Not Fair and Balanced?

Weather Channel founder John Coleman is calling global warming a fraud and says the station he founded needs to stop telling people what to think about climate change. The Business and Media Institute reports Coleman was a speaker at the Heartland Institute’s Climate Change Conference in New York. Coleman was referencing what some call the Weather Channel’s global warming alarmism.

One of its meteorologists suggested two years ago that weathercasters who have doubts about global warming should lose their certification. Coleman advocates suing people who sell carbon credits — including Al Gore — because the attention in the courts could, in his words, “put some light on the fraud of global warming.”

The two-day conference is actually getting quite a bit of media coverage — with stories in the Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, New York Sun and many others.”

Click here to view the Fox news article:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,335030,00.html

The trancript of John Coleman’s conversation is listed on Rush Limabaugh’s website. Rush members can listen to it. Here are John Coleman’s remarks:

 “BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
 
 
RUSH: John Coleman, who founded the Weather Channel, wants to sue Algore on this whole business of global warming being a hoax.  I have loved John Coleman ever since he used to be the weatherman at Good Morning America. He was on Fox & Friends today, and Steve Doocy said, “Why should Algore be sued?”

COLEMAN:  The whole backbone of the global warming “science” is what they called CO2 forcing.  This is carbon dioxide, and they say that this little trace compound in the atmosphere — 38 molecules of carbon dioxide out of a hundred thousand molecules in our atmosphere, they say this little trace element — puts the carbon in the air that forces the water vapor to create this uncontrollable global warming. It’s gonna bring this climatic catastrophe.

DOOCY: Right. Right.

COLEMAN: All right, that’s what they’re finding.  Now, I don’t believe that’s the way it works at all.

DOOCY: Mmm-hmm. Mmm-hmm.

COLEMAN: I see absolutely no evidence that CO2, carbon dioxide, is causing any warm-up in temperatures.  I don’t think it’s happening. I’m asking the question:  If Al Gore knows that CO2 forcing is invalid — isn’t really happening — and he goes ahead and sells these carbon credits for millions of dollars, is he committing financial fraud?  That is the question.

RUSH:  Doocy says, “Well, John, there’s no disputing the temperature on the planet’s gone up by one degree.” Steve, it’s come down a degree! The whole century gain was wiped out before recent temperature readings, and here’s what Coleman said.

COLEMAN:  I dispute that.

DOOCY:  You do dispute that!

COLEMAN:  I think the whole statistics are somewhat questionable.  Where are they measuring this temperature?  Who’s measuring it?  How are they handling the data? 

DOOCY:  The whole global warming thing is just a hyped scam?

COLEMAN:  Maybe over the last hundred years the temperature on planet Earth went up by close to a degree or so. 

DOOCY: Mmm-hmm?

COLEMAN: That’s not a big deal.  In the last 12 months, the climate on earth has gone down by a full degree.  This has been the coldest winter in modern history globally.

DOOCY: Sure.

RUSH:  Amen.  John Coleman.  I love that guy.
 
 
 
 
END TRANSCRIPT ”

Listen to Rush or go to Rush Limbaugh’s site to learn more:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_030508/content/01125115.guest.html
 
 

Climate Science: Roger Pielke Sr. Research Group News, Global Warming

R.A. Pielke Sr. has relaunched a climate science blog. Here is the announcement from the site:

“As a result of very positive encouragement from many Climate Science readers, I have decided to relaunch the website. The format will be different than in the past, however, in that comments will not be permitted. The posting of information will not be on a schedule, but when new information on a climate science issue is available that is otherwise not very visible, or has been misrepresented in the media.

The presentation of climate science in the media, unfortunately, remains biased, as has been documented numerous times on Climate Science. Thus, I have decided to reenter this mechanism of providing information. While comments will not be permitted on the website, guest presentations will be invited when there is value in providing this source of information.

Climate Science will thus provide a source of information on climate that, hopefully, will be useful to others, as part of a much needed effort to provide a balanced view of climate science.

Thanks to those who have found my website of value and take the time to read it!”

Below are the main conclusions of Roger Pielke SR.:

The Climate Science Weblog has clearly documented the following
conclusions since July 2005:
  1. The needed focus for the study of climate change and variability is on the regional and local scales. Global and zonally-averaged climate metrics would only be important to the extent that they provide useful information on these space scales.
  2. Global and zonally-averaged surface temperature trend assessments, besides having major difficulties in terms of how this metric is diagnosed and analyzed, do not provide significant information on climate change and variability on the regional and local scales.
  3. Global warming is not equivalent to climate change. Significant, societally important climate change, due to both natural- and human- climate forcings, can occur without any global warming or cooling.
  4. The spatial pattern of ocean heat content change is the appropriate metric to assess climate system heat changes including global warming.
  5. In terms of climate change and variability on the regional and local scale, the IPCC Reports, the CCSP Report on surface and tropospheric temperature trends, and the U.S. National Assessment have overstated the role of the radiative effect of the anthropogenic increase of CO2 relative to the role of the diversity of other human climate climate forcing on global warming, and more generally, on climate variability and change.
  6. Global and regional climate models have not demonstrated skill at predicting regional and local climate change and variability on multi-decadal time scales.
  7. Attempts to significantly influence regional and local-scale climate based on controlling CO2 emissions alone is an inadequate policy for this purpose.
  8. A vulnerability paradigm, focused on regional and local societal and environmental resources of importance, is a more inclusive, useful, and scientifically robust framework to interact with policymakers, than is the focus on global multi-decadal climate predictions which are downscaled to the regional and local scales. The vulnerability paradigm permits the evaluation of the entire spectrum of risks associated with different social and environmental threats, including climate variability and change.

Humans are significantly altering the global climate, but in a variety of diverse ways beyond the radiative effect of carbon dioxide. The IPCC assessments have been too conservative in recognizing the importance of these human climate forcings as they alter regional and global climate. These assessments have also not communicated the inability of the models to accurately forecast the spread of possibilities of future climate. The forecasts, therefore, do not provide any skill in quantifying the impact of different mitigation strategies on the actual climate response
that would occur.”

Visit the weblog at:

http://climatesci.org/

<!– –>

Rush Limbaugh, global warming, Al Gore, climate stations, global warming myths

If you only listen to Rush Limbaugh for one topic, global warming, it is well worth your time. Rush Limbaugh is one of a few credible sources of information on factual data concerning alleged global warming. As Rush says, follow the money. Just a few years ago the so called experts were warning of global cooling and everyday we are bombarded with more misinformation and exagerations. The temperature change increase seems to change daily depending on which expert or politician is speaking. It is the policy of fear mongering and using political platforms to save the helpless populace.

Listen to the Rush Limbaugh show as often as you can and of course go to his website and check out the links on the global warming myth. Here is an example of a recent link on Rush’s site:

“Del. global warming skeptic stands pat

State climatologist on opposite side of governor in court case

Enter Legates, a Ph.D. climatologist who received the title of state climatologist in 2005 from Daniel Leathers, now the head of the University of Delaware’s geography department.

Legates joined a group of scientists late last year in urging the court to reject the state claims, in a brief filed by the conservative Competitive Enterprise Institute.

“It is simply impossible to conclude that the net effect of greenhouse gases endangers human health and welfare,” the brief said.”

Read the rest of this story here:

http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070201/NEWS/702010363/1006/NEWS

For more great information and links like the one above, visit Rush Limbaugh’s website at:

http://RushLimbaugh.com

Another great source for information on the global warming myth is a blog I discovered. Rush, if you have not seen this blog, you must visit it. Attention Rush Limbaugh and truth seekers everywhere.

Visit:

http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com

The blog is owned by Anthony Watts and in his own words he is “a former television meteorologist who operates a weather technology and content business, as well as continues daily forecasting on radio, just for fun.” Go to his blog and search on global warming. His articles are based on solid facts and he exposes much of the quasi science such as that used in the climate station temperature monitoring.

Here sre some of his recent posts:

http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/how-not-to-measure-temperature-part-51/

http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/global-warming-killed-nessie/

http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/02/08/increasing-tornadoes-or-better-information-gathering/

I always recommend that people search for the truth and facts. Don’t believe everything you read or here, such as from Al Gore. Just for fun, about a year ago I checked on the average temperatures in Antartica. Check this out for yourself. Check out the average summer temperature in Antartica. Keep your eye on the truth.