Category Archives: Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton

To Donald Trump from Citizen Wells, Do not be tricked into conceding election if it appears that you lost, Election is over January 6, 2017 after congress certifies Electoral College votes, Lots of time left for Clintons to be investigated and prosecuted

To Donald Trump from Citizen Wells, Do not be tricked into conceding election if it appears that you lost, Election is over January 6, 2017 after congress certifies Electoral College votes, Lots of time left for Clintons to be investigated and prosecute

“If This Story Gets Out, We Are Screwed”…Wikileaks: Doug Band to John Podesta

“James Comey’s decision to revive the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server and her handling of classified material came after he could no longer resist mounting pressure by mutinous agents in the FBI, including some of his top deputies, according to a source close to the embattled FBI director.”…Daily Mail October 30, 2016

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

 

 

I do not yet know who is going to “win” the general election.

What I do know is that the election is not over until January 6, 2017 when congress certifies the Electoral College votes.

Even then, a congressman by law can object.

Multiple investigations are ongoing that involve Hillary and the Clintons.

And even with the corrupt Obama Justice Dept., it is possible that unhappy FBI or NYPD may leak damaging information such as pedophilia involving the Clintons.

From Citizen Wells October 31, 2016.

Another Democrat running for the office of the Presidency and more controversy regarding their eligibility.

In 2008 it was Obama and his natural born citizen status.

Despite the lies from the mainstream media, that issue has not been resolved.

Now with Hillary Clinton, if she garners enough votes, will she survive the election process of Electoral College votes being counted and certified and inauguration without being disqualified due to arrest and or indictment?

Here is a good description of “High Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

http://www.constitution.org/cmt/high_crimes.htm

Sadly, most Americans are uninformed on the US President election process.

The Democrats appear to like it that way.

If you don’t believe that, check out Wikileaks.

Below is some important information on how this works.

From the US Electoral College.

THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

“November 8, 2016—Election Day

Registered voters cast their votes for President and Vice President. By doing so, they also help choose the electors who will represent their state in the Electoral College.

Mid-November through December 19, 2016

After the presidential election, the governor of your state prepares seven Certificates of Ascertainment. “As soon as practicable,” after the election results in your state are certified, the governor sends one of the Certificates of Ascertainment to the Archivist.

Certificates of Ascertainment should be sent to the Archivist no later than the meeting of the electors in December. However, federal law sets no penalty for missing the deadline.

The remaining six Certificates of Ascertainment are held for use at the meeting of the Electors in December.

December 13, 2016

States must make final decisions in any controversies over the appointment of their electors at least six days before the meeting of the Electors. This is so their electoral votes will be presumed valid when presented to Congress.

Decisions by states’ courts are conclusive, if decided under laws enacted before Election Day.

December 19, 2016

The Electors meet in their state and vote for President and Vice President on separate ballots. The electors record their votes on six “Certificates of Vote,” which are paired with the six remaining Certificates of Ascertainment.

The electors sign, seal, and certify six sets of electoral votes. A set of electoral votes consists of one Certificate of Ascertainment and one Certificate of Vote. These are distributed immediately as follows:

  • one set to the President of the Senate (the Vice President) for the official count of the electoral votes in January;
  • two packages to the Secretary of State in the state where the electors met—one is an archival set that becomes part of the public record of the Secretary of State’s office and the other is a reserve set that is subject to the call of the President of the Senate to replace missing or incomplete electoral votes;
  • two packages to the Archivist—one is an archival set that becomes part of the permanent collection at the National Archives and Records Administration and the other is a reserve set that is subject to the call of the President of the Senate to replace missing or incomplete electoral votes; and
  • one set to the presiding judge in the district where the Electors met—this is also a reserve set that is subject to the call of the President of the Senate to replace missing or incomplete electoral votes.

December 28, 2016

Electoral votes (the Certificates of Vote) must be received by the President of the Senate and the Archivist no later than nine days after the meeting of the electors. States face no legal penalty for failure to comply.

If votes are lost or delayed, the Archivist may take extraordinary measures to retrieve duplicate originals.

On or Before January 3, 2017

The Archivist and/or representatives from the Office of the Federal Register meet with the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House in late December or early January. This is, in part, a ceremonial occasion. Informal meetings may take place earlier.

January 6, 2017

The Congress meets in joint session to count the electoral votes. Congress may pass a law to change this date.

The Vice President, as President of the Senate, presides over the count and announces the results of the Electoral College vote. The President of the Senate then declares which persons, if any, have been elected President and Vice President of the United States.

If a State submits conflicting sets of electoral votes to Congress, the two Houses acting concurrently may accept or reject the votes. If they do not concur, the votes of the electors certified by the Governor of the State on the Certificate of Ascertainment would be counted in Congress.

If no Presidential candidate wins 270 or more electoral votes, a majority, the 12th Amendment to the Constitution provides for the House of Representatives to decide the Presidential election. If necessary the House would elect the President by majority vote, choosing from the three candidates who received the greatest number of electoral votes. The vote would be taken by state, with each state having one vote.

If no Vice Presidential candidate wins 270 or more electoral votes, a majority, the 12th Amendment provides for the Senate to elect the Vice President. If necessary, the Senate would elect the Vice President by majority vote, choosing from the two candidates who received the greatest number of electoral votes. The vote would be taken by state, with each Senator having one vote.

If any objections to the Electoral College vote are made, they must be submitted in writing and be signed by at least one member of the House and one Senator. If objections are presented, the House and Senate withdraw to their respective chambers to consider their merits under procedures set out in federal law.

January 20, 2017 at Noon—Inauguration Day

The President-elect takes the Oath of Office and becomes the President of the United States.”

https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/key-dates.html

AMENDMENT XX

“Section 1. The terms of the President and Vice President shall
end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators
and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January,
of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article
had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall
then begin.

Section 2. The Congress shall assemble at least once in every
year, and such meeting shall begin at noon on the 3d day of
January, unless they shall by law appoint a different day.

Section 3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of
the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice
President elect shall become President. If a President shall not
have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his
term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then
the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President
shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the
case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect
shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President,
or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and
such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice
President shall have qualified.”

From Citizen Wells December 13, 2008.

“ELECTORAL COLLEGE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Q: What is the Electoral College?:

A: The Electoral College was established by the founding fathers
as a compromise between election of the president by Congress and
election by popular vote. The people of the United States vote for
the electors who then vote for the President. Read more

Q: Frequently asked questions:

A: Read more here

Q: Why did the Founding Fathers create the Electoral College?:

A:  The Founding Father’s intent

Here is a quote by Alexander Hamilton who, like many of the founding
fathers, was “afraid a tyrant could manipulate public opinion and come
to power.” Hamilton wrote in the Federalist Papers:

“It was equally desirable, that the immediate election should be made
by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station,
and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a
judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were
proper to govern their choice. A small number of persons, selected by
their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to
possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated
investigations. It was also peculiarly desirable to afford as little
opportunity as possible to tumult and disorder. This evil was not least
to be dreaded in the election of a magistrate, who was to have so
important an agency in the administration of the government as the
President of the United States. But the precautions which have been so
happily concerted in the system under consideration, promise an
effectual security against this mischief.”

Q: What are the state laws governing Electors?:

A: List of states and restrictions on Electors

Q: What are so called “Faithless Electors”?:

A: “The Supreme Court has held that the Constitution does not require
that electors be completely free to act as they choose and therefore,
political parties may extract pledges from electors to vote for the
parties’ nominees. Some State laws provide that so-called “faithless
electors” may be subject to fines or may be disqualified for casting
an invalid vote and be replaced by a substitute elector. The Supreme
Court has not specifically ruled on the question of whether pledges
and penalties for failure to vote as pledged may be enforced under
the Constitution. No elector has ever been prosecuted for failing to
vote as pledged.” Read more here

The US Supreme Court Obviously has not given Electors the option to
violate the US Constitution. Therefore, obviously, if the presidential
candidate is qualified, party pledges and state laws are permissable.

Q: What must an Elector be aware of when voting for a presidential candidate?:

 A: The following are important considerations when casting a vote. Voting
as instructed by a political party, another person, or a state law in
conflict with the US Constitution or Federal Election Laws is a serious
matter. Those not voting in accordance with higher laws are subject to
prosecution and may be guilty of “High Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
High Crimes and Misdemeanors

UNITED STATES ELECTION LAW

“The following provisions of law governing Presidential Elections are contained in Chapter 1 of Title 3, United States Code (62 Stat. 672, as amended):”

“§ 8.   The electors shall vote for President and Vice President, respectively, in the manner directed by the Constitution.”

ARE ELECTORS REQUIRED TO VOTE ACCORDING TO POPULAR VOTE?

“There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires
electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in
their States. Some States, however, require electors to cast their
votes according to the popular vote. These pledges fall into two
categories—electors bound by State law and those bound by pledges
to political parties.”   (From US National Archives)

SO CALLED “FAITHLESS ELECTORS”

“It turns out there is no federal law that requires an elector to
vote according to their pledge (to their respective party). And so,
more than a few electors have cast their votes without following the
popular vote or their party. These electors are called “faithless
electors.”

In response to these faithless electors’ actions, several states
have created laws to enforce an elector’s pledge to his or her party
vote or the popular vote. Some states even go the extra step to
assess a misdemeanor charge and a fine to such actions. For example,
the state of North Carolina charges a fine of $10,000 to faithless
electors.

It’s important to note, that although these states have created these
laws, a large number of scholars believe that such state-level laws
hold no true bearing and would not survive constitutional challenge.”
Read more here

STATE LAW EXAMPLE: PENNSYLVANIA

Ҥ 3192. Meeting of electors; duties.
The electors chosen, as aforesaid, shall assemble at the seat
of government of this Commonwealth, at 12 o’clock noon of the
day which is, or may be, directed by the Congress of the United
States, and shall then and there perform the duties enjoined upon
them by the Constitution and laws of the United States
.”

“The mysteries of the Electoral College has enabled Pennsylvania
to play an unusually major role in determining who is President.
In 1796, Thomas Jefferson defeated John Adams in Pennsylvania’s
popular election by only 62 votes, but the Pennsylvania electors
gave Jefferson 14 votes and Adams 1, though Adams did win the
Electoral vote, 71 to 68.” Read more here

ELECTORS HELPED SAVE THE UNION

1860 election: 4 electors in New Jersey, pledged for Stephen Douglas,
voted for Republican candidate Abraham Lincoln.”

2008 US Presidential Election, Electoral College, Electors, US Constitution, Federal Election Law, State Election Laws, State officers, State Election Officials, Judges, US Supreme Court Justices, Democratic Disaster, Questions and answers

Should Hillary Clinton “win” the general election, it does not guarantee that she will be sworn in.

https://citizenwells.com/2016/10/31/hillary-removal-from-election-and-inauguration-us-election-checkpoints-and-rules-general-election-through-electoral-college-certification-and-finally-swearing-in-hillary-can-be-removed-before-becom/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Hillary steps down for medical reasons before indictment, 3 compelling sources reveal Hillary evil, David Schippers, James Kallstrom former second in command of FBI, Concensus from current FBI agents, 90 % chance of indictment, Question is when

Hillary steps down for medical reasons before indictment, 3 compelling sources reveal Hillary evil, David Schippers, James Kallstrom former second in command of FBI, Concensus from current FBI agents, 90 % chance of indictment, Question is when

“If This Story Gets Out, We Are Screwed”…Wikileaks: Doug Band to John Podesta

“James Comey’s decision to revive the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server and her handling of classified material came after he could no longer resist mounting pressure by mutinous agents in the FBI, including some of his top deputies, according to a source close to the embattled FBI director.”…Daily Mail October 30, 2016

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

 

I do not believe that Hillary Clinton would step down for the good of the country.

She is a sociopath.

She may do it to save face, for “medical reasons”.

There is a very good chance that Hillary will be indicted.

The question is when.

It does not have to occur before November 8 to deny her the presidency.

“Sadly, most Americans are uninformed on the US President election process.

The Democrats appear to like it that way.

If you don’t believe that, check out Wikileaks.

Below is some important information on how this works.”

https://citizenwells.com/2016/10/31/hillary-removal-from-election-and-inauguration-us-election-checkpoints-and-rules-general-election-through-electoral-college-certification-and-finally-swearing-in-hillary-can-be-removed-before-becom/

David Schippers.

David Schippers, a long time Democrat and 2 time voter for Bill Clinton conducted an investigation for the House Judiciary Committee. So his findings were hardly part of a right wing conspiracy.

In fact, if there was any conspiracy, it included Republicans and Democrats who did not want to get their hands dirty or remove Clinton from office.

Schippers found far more felonious and/or improper activity by Bill Clinton than what was presented. He was restricted by time constraints and limited to the immediate scandals presented to him.

On Hillary Clinton: “evil incarnate.”

James Kallstrom, former second in command of FBI.

From a Megyn Kelly interview yesterday.

I’ve talked to hundreds and hundreds of agents in the FBI. And the agents are furious.
I think it’s people who are sick and tired of the lack of the rule of law being brought forward and due process being brought forward.
And they’re frustrated that they cannot conduct investigations properly.
They’re very very frustrated. They see the whole due process thing going down the tubes.

From YourNewsWire.com November 3, 2016.

“FBI: We’re Ready To Indict Hillary Clinton

The FBI have said there is a 90% chance that Hillary Clinton will be indicted within days, as evidence of a Washington pedophile ring involving the Clinton Foundation emerges. 

Multiple reports of FBI agents speaking to major media outlets over the last 24 hours since the child sex scandalbroke say that the department is “actively and aggressively” pursuing the Clintons in five separate probes.”

“A deep hatred of Hillary Clinton exists within the FBI, multiple bureau agents told the Guardian. Agents explained that Clinton is considered “the antichrist” within the department, and a desire to stop her being elected spurred the rapid series of damaging leaks just days before the election.

A Wall Street Journal report says the FBI’s pursuit of the case is rooted in recordings of a suspect in a different corruption case who spoke about the Clinton Foundation’s dirty dealings.

FBI: “90% Chance Of Indictment And Prosecution”

The FBI say there is a 90% chance of indictment and prosecution for Hillary Clinton and others connected to the Clinton Foundation and Clinton campaign.”

FBI: We’re Ready To Indict Hillary Clinton

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

“Hillary should take lie detector test” says alleged Clinton sex assault victim, Wikileaks email # 45134, From Iain Dey New York correspondent for The Sunday Times, Kathleen Willey challenged Hillary to take test, Answer questions about husband’s alleged sexual attacks

“Hillary should take lie detector test” says alleged Clinton sex assault victim, Wikileaks email # 45134, From Iain Dey New York correspondent for The Sunday Times, Kathleen Willey challenged Hillary to take test, Answer questions about husband’s alleged sexual attacks

“If This Story Gets Out, We Are Screwed”…Wikileaks: Doug Band to John Podesta

“James Comey’s decision to revive the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server and her handling of classified material came after he could no longer resist mounting pressure by mutinous agents in the FBI, including some of his top deputies, according to a source close to the embattled FBI director.”…Daily Mail October 30, 2016

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

 

 

From Wikileaks email # 45134.

“Fwd: “HILLARY SHOULD TAKE LIE DETECTOR TEST” SAYS ALLEGED CLINTON SEX ASSAULT VICTIM
From:Tina@presidentclinton.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2016-01-08 16:59
Subject: Fwd: “HILLARY SHOULD TAKE LIE DETECTOR TEST” SAYS ALLEGED CLINTON SEX ASSAULT VICTIM
Begin forwarded message:

From: Craig Minassian <cminassian@clintonfoundation.org<mailto:cminassian@clintonfoundation.org>>
Date: January 8, 2016 at 1:49:32 PM EST
To: Tina Flournoy <Tina@presidentclinton.com<mailto:Tina@presidentclinton.com>>, “Angel Urena – PC” <angel@presidentclinton.com<mailto:angel@presidentclinton.com>>
Subject: Fwd: “HILLARY SHOULD TAKE LIE DETECTOR TEST” SAYS ALLEGED CLINTON SEX ASSAULT VICTIM

He bcc’d me this outreach to the campaign

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: “Dey, Iain” <iain.dey@sunday-times.co.uk<mailto:iain.dey@sunday-times.co.uk>>
Date: January 8, 2016 at 1:18:10 PM EST
To: press@hillaryclinton.com<mailto:press@hillaryclinton.com>
Subject: “HILLARY SHOULD TAKE LIE DETECTOR TEST” SAYS ALLEGED CLINTON SEX ASSAULT VICTIM

Hi there,

My name is Iain Dey. I am the New York Correspondent for The Sunday Times, the British newspaper.

I have been talking to Kathleen Willey, one of the women who has accused President Clinton of sexually assault for many years.

She has challenged Secretary Clinton to take a lie detector test – in front of Chelsea and baby Charlotte – while answering questions about her husband’s alleged sexual attacks.

I wanted to give Sec Clinton a chance to respond to that suggestion.

Before you tell me, I know that were attempts to discredit Kathleen at the time. She also admits that she previously lied to the FBI, but she has explained to me her reasons for doing so – which make sense.

Her story is the same – that Pres Clinton grabbed and groped her in a room adjacent to the oval office after she went to ask him for a job.

She also claims to have been subjected to extensive harassment and death threats immediately before she gave a deposition in relation to the Paula Jones case. She believes this to have been instigated by the Clinton camp at the time, but obviously has no proof.

If there is any response to any of this please respond as soon as possible. I am now on deadline.

Sorry to spring this, but I have only spoken to Kathleen this morning.

Many thanks
Iain Dey

IAIN DEY
New York Correspondent
The Sunday Times of London
+1 929 275 1555
Twitter: @IainDey

[http://imgur.com/NnYimGn.jpg]”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/45134

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Peter Kadzik heads up to John Podesta May 19, 2015, “There is a HJC oversight hearing today where the head of our Civil Division will testify. Likely to get questions on State Department emails.” DOJ Kadzik Podesta attorney and friend

Peter Kadzik heads up to John Podesta May 19, 2015, “There is a HJC oversight hearing today where the head of our Civil Division will testify. Likely to get questions on State Department emails.” DOJ Kadzik Podesta attorney and friend

“If This Story Gets Out, We Are Screwed”…Wikileaks: Doug Band to John Podesta

“James Comey’s decision to revive the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server and her handling of classified material came after he could no longer resist mounting pressure by mutinous agents in the FBI, including some of his top deputies, according to a source close to the embattled FBI director.”…Daily Mail October 30, 2016

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

 

From Wikileaks email # 43150.

“Fwd: Heads up

From:john.podesta@gmail.com
To: jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com, bfallon@hillaryclinton.com, cheryl.mills@gmail.com, hsamuelson@cdmillsgroup.com, kschake@hillaryclinton.com, nmerrill@hillaryclinton.com
Date: 2015-05-19 11:12
Subject: Fwd: Heads up

Additional chances for mischief.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: *Peter Kadzik* <peterkadzik@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2015
Subject: Heads up
To: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>
There is a HJC oversight hearing today where the head of our Civil Division
will testify. Likely to get questions on State Department emails. Another
filing in the FOIA case went in last night or will go in this am that
indicates it will be awhile (2016) before the State Department posts the
emails.”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/43150

Peter Kadzik and John Podesta ties.

“We just learned that Peter Kadzik of the Justice Dept. is overseeing the FBI investigation of Hillary emails found on Anthony Weiner/Huma Abedin devices.

And according to John Podesta, Peter Kadzik “Kept me out of jail”.

There is much more to this story and The Daily Caller has it.

“The day after Hillary Clinton testified in front of the House Select Committee on Benghazi last October, John Podesta, the Democrat’s campaign chairman, met for dinner with a small group of well-connected friends, including Peter Kadzik, a top official at the Justice Department.

The dinner arrangement, revealed in hacked Podesta emails released by WikiLeaks, is just the latest example of an apparent conflict of interest between the Clinton campaign and the federal agency charged with investigating the former secretary of state’s email practices.

Podesta and Kadzik, the assistant attorney general for legislative affairs, were in frequent contact, other emails show. In one email from January, Kadzik and Podesta, who were classmates at Georgetown Law School in the 1970s, discussed plans to celebrate Podesta’s birthday. And in another sent last May, Kadzik’s son emailed Podesta asking for a job on the Clinton campaign.

The post-Benghazi dinner was attended by Podesta, Kadzik, superlobbyist Vincent Roberti and other well-placed Beltway fixtures.”

“Kadzik, who started at the DOJ in 2013, helped spearhead the effort to nominate Lynch, who was heavily criticized for her secret meeting with the former president.

In the trenches

Podesta and Kadzik have a long history — one which has largely gone unnoticed during the ongoing Clinton email scandal.

Kadzik represented Podesta during the Monica Lewinsky investigation. And in the waning days of the Bill Clinton administration, Kadzik lobbied Podesta on behalf of Marc Rich, the fugitive who Bill Clinton controversially pardoned on his last day in office.

That history is cited by Podesta in another email hacked from his Gmail account.

In a Sept. 2008 email, which the Washington Free Beacon flagged last week, Podesta emailed an Obama campaign official to recommend Kadzik for a supportive role in the campaign.

Podesta, who would later head up the Obama White House transition effort, wrote that Kadzik was a “fantastic lawyer” who “kept me out of jail.””

“Podesta had been promoted to Clinton’s chief of staff when he and Kadzik became embroiled in another scandal.

Kadzik was then representing Marc Rich, a billionaire financier who was wanted by the U.S. government for evading a $48 million tax bill. The fugitive, who was also implicated in illegal trading activity with nations that sponsored terrorism, had been living in Switzerland for 17 years when he sought the pardon.

To help Rich, Kadzik lobbied Podesta heavily in the weeks before Clinton left office on Jan. 20, 2001.

A House Oversight Committee report released in May 2002 stated that “Kadzik was recruited into Marc Rich’s lobbying campaign because he was a long-time friend of White House Chief of Staff John Podesta.””

“DeSantis, a Republican, suggested that Lynch’s appointment by Bill Clinton in 1999 as U.S. Attorney in New York may be considered a conflict of interest. He also asserted that Obama’s political appointees — a list which includes Kadzik — “are being asked to impartially execute their respective duties as Department of Justice officials that may involve an investigation into the activities of the forerunner for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States.”

https://citizenwells.com/2016/11/01/peter-kadzik-background-podesta-clinton-justivce-dept-history-multiple-conflicts-of-interest-kadzik-must-be-recused-from-any-involvement-with-fbi-hillary-emails-investigation-house-judiciary-commi/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

 

James O’Keefe in NC racist video, “releasing hidden camera footage of a Dem racist statement”, “I was escorted by multiple Port Authority officers and other security right onto the airplane at JFK. En route to NC.”

James O’Keefe in NC racist video, “releasing hidden camera footage of a Dem racist statement”, “I was escorted by multiple Port Authority officers and other security right onto the airplane at JFK. En route to NC.”

“If This Story Gets Out, We Are Screwed”…Wikileaks: Doug Band to John Podesta

“James Comey’s decision to revive the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server and her handling of classified material came after he could no longer resist mounting pressure by mutinous agents in the FBI, including some of his top deputies, according to a source close to the embattled FBI director.”…Daily Mail October 30, 2016

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

 

 

From the James O’Keefe Twitter account yesterday, November 1, 2016.

“Tomorrow @PVeritas_Action and @POTUS will be in NC. One of us will be releasing hidden camera footage of a Dem racist statement. Stay tuned.”

“When they saw my name, I was escorted by multiple Port Authority officers and other security right onto the airplane at JFK. En route to NC.”

The video will be posted when available.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Peter Kadzik background Podesta Clinton Justice Dept. history, Multiple conflicts of interest, Kadzik must be recused from any involvement with FBI Hillary emails investigation, House Judiciary committee must step in

Peter Kadzik background Podesta Clinton Justice Dept. history, Multiple conflicts of interest, Kadzik must be recused from any involvement with FBI Hillary emails investigation, House Judiciary committee must step in

“If This Story Gets Out, We Are Screwed”…Wikileaks: Doug Band to John Podesta

“James Comey’s decision to revive the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server and her handling of classified material came after he could no longer resist mounting pressure by mutinous agents in the FBI, including some of his top deputies, according to a source close to the embattled FBI director.”…Daily Mail October 30, 2016

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

 

Hillary Clinton, DNC, John Podesta and FBI emails investigation news is happening fast.

We just learned that Peter Kadzik of the Justice Dept. is overseeing the FBI investigation of Hillary emails found on Anthony Weiner/Huma Abedin devices.

And according to John Podesta, Peter Kadzik “Kept me out of jail”.

There is much more to this story and The Daily Caller has it.

“The day after Hillary Clinton testified in front of the House Select Committee on Benghazi last October, John Podesta, the Democrat’s campaign chairman, met for dinner with a small group of well-connected friends, including Peter Kadzik, a top official at the Justice Department.

The dinner arrangement, revealed in hacked Podesta emails released by WikiLeaks, is just the latest example of an apparent conflict of interest between the Clinton campaign and the federal agency charged with investigating the former secretary of state’s email practices.

Podesta and Kadzik, the assistant attorney general for legislative affairs, were in frequent contact, other emails show. In one email from January, Kadzik and Podesta, who were classmates at Georgetown Law School in the 1970s, discussed plans to celebrate Podesta’s birthday. And in another sent last May, Kadzik’s son emailed Podesta asking for a job on the Clinton campaign.

The post-Benghazi dinner was attended by Podesta, Kadzik, superlobbyist Vincent Roberti and other well-placed Beltway fixtures.”

“Kadzik, who started at the DOJ in 2013, helped spearhead the effort to nominate Lynch, who was heavily criticized for her secret meeting with the former president.

In the trenches

Podesta and Kadzik have a long history — one which has largely gone unnoticed during the ongoing Clinton email scandal.

Kadzik represented Podesta during the Monica Lewinsky investigation. And in the waning days of the Bill Clinton administration, Kadzik lobbied Podesta on behalf of Marc Rich, the fugitive who Bill Clinton controversially pardoned on his last day in office.

That history is cited by Podesta in another email hacked from his Gmail account.

In a Sept. 2008 email, which the Washington Free Beacon flagged last week, Podesta emailed an Obama campaign official to recommend Kadzik for a supportive role in the campaign.

Podesta, who would later head up the Obama White House transition effort, wrote that Kadzik was a “fantastic lawyer” who “kept me out of jail.””

“Podesta had been promoted to Clinton’s chief of staff when he and Kadzik became embroiled in another scandal.

Kadzik was then representing Marc Rich, a billionaire financier who was wanted by the U.S. government for evading a $48 million tax bill. The fugitive, who was also implicated in illegal trading activity with nations that sponsored terrorism, had been living in Switzerland for 17 years when he sought the pardon.

To help Rich, Kadzik lobbied Podesta heavily in the weeks before Clinton left office on Jan. 20, 2001.

A House Oversight Committee report released in May 2002 stated that “Kadzik was recruited into Marc Rich’s lobbying campaign because he was a long-time friend of White House Chief of Staff John Podesta.””

“DeSantis, a Republican, suggested that Lynch’s appointment by Bill Clinton in 1999 as U.S. Attorney in New York may be considered a conflict of interest. He also asserted that Obama’s political appointees — a list which includes Kadzik — “are being asked to impartially execute their respective duties as Department of Justice officials that may involve an investigation into the activities of the forerunner for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States.”

Read more:

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/25/clinton-campaign-chairman-had-multiple-dinners-with-top-doj-official-during-clinton-email-investigation/#ixzz4Omq0F4dt
Read more:

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/25/clinton-campaign-chairman-had-multiple-dinners-with-top-doj-official-during-clinton-email-investigation/#ixzz4OmobHQVl

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

Peter Kadzik “Kept me out of jail” John Podesta in Wikileaks emails, Kadzik represented White House aide Podesta during the Monica Lewinsky perjury investigation, Kadzik and Podesta had social encounters, Kadzik heads new FBI email investigation

Peter Kadzik “Kept me out of jail” John Podesta in Wikileaks emails, Kadzik represented White House aide Podesta during the Monica Lewinsky perjury investigation, Kadzik and Podesta had social encounters, Kadzik heads new FBI email investigation

“If This Story Gets Out, We Are Screwed”…Wikileaks: Doug Band to John Podesta

“James Comey’s decision to revive the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server and her handling of classified material came after he could no longer resist mounting pressure by mutinous agents in the FBI, including some of his top deputies, according to a source close to the embattled FBI director.”…Daily Mail October 30, 2016

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

 

Zero Hedge, reported at Citizen Wells yesterday revealed that:

“John Podesta’s Best Friend At The DOJ Will Be In Charge Of The DOJ’s Probe Into Huma Abedin Emails”

“Now that the FBI has obtained the needed warrant to start poring over the 650,000 or so emails uncovered in Anthony Weiner’s notebook, among which thousands of emails sent from Huma Abedin using Hillary Clinton’s personal server, moments ago the Us Justice Department decided to also finally join the probe, and as AP reported moments ago, it vowed to dedicate all needed resources to quickly review the over half a million emails in the Clinton case.

BREAKING: Justice Dept. says it’ll dedicate all needed resources to quickly review emails in Clinton case.

In the letter to Congress, the DOJ writes that it “will continue to work closely with the FBI and together, dedicate all necessary resources and take appropriate steps as expeditiously as possible,” assistant attorney General Peter J. Kadzikwrites in letters to House and Senate lawmakers.”

“In other words, the best friend of John Podesta, Clinton’s Campaign char, at the DOJ will be in charge of a probe that could potentially sink Hillary Clinton.”

https://citizenwells.com/2016/10/31/peter-kadzik-will-be-in-charge-of-justice-dept-probe-of-huma-abedin-emails-kadzik-friend-of-john-podesta-ties-to-clinton-administration-another-example-of-the-clinton-campaigns-c/

From Wikileaks we learn:

That John Podesta stated that Peter Kadzik “Kept me out of jail”.

“Peter Kadzik

From:john.podesta@gmail.com
To: cbutts.obama08@gmail.com
Date: 2008-09-08 17:21
Subject: Peter Kadzik

Willing to help. Fantastic lawyer. Kept me out of jail. I’m sure
Christine knows him. Wants to help. Think he would be an excellent
vet lead. 202-420-4704”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3933

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/31469

They also socialized together.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24083

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25683

More here:

https://search.wikileaks.org/?q=kadzik

From Free Beacon October 18, 2016.

“An attorney who represented then-White House aide John Podesta during the Monica Lewinsky perjury investigation “kept me out of jail,” according to Podesta, now the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

The lawyer, Peter Kadzik, was later at the center of a scandal over Clinton White House pardons for family members of high-dollar Democratic donors.”

http://freebeacon.com/politics/podesta-lawyer-lewinsky-probe-kept-jail/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/