Katie Hobbs AZ Secretary of State: Trump derangement syndrome not illegal, Election fraud coverup and lying on vote certification is, Arizona hearing
“Evil and stupid is a bad combination.”...Citizen Wells
“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show
“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State
The Arizona election hearing with AZ state legislators, Trump legal team and numerous credible witnesses is still ongoing as this is written.
Being approx. half way through, it is abundantly clear that the vote totals certified by Katie Hobbs AZ Secretary of State this morning are not accurate and that Hobbs is guilty of fraud and a coverup.
Why? She obviously has Trump derangement syndrome and as is typical of irrational people of her agenda, the end justifies the means.
From the AP:
“Democratic Secretary of State Katie Hobbs certified the election results alongside Gov. Doug Ducey and Attorney General Mark Brnovich, both Republicans, and state Supreme Court Chief Justice Robert Brutinel.
Hobbs and Ducey both vouched for the integrity of the vote count.”
Arizona election hearing watch live 11:00 ET November 30 with Trump legal team & select AZ legislators, Gather evidence that justifies calling a special session
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State
“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show
“
Urgent Public Hearing with President Donald J. Trump’s Legal Team and Select Members of the Arizona Legislature on the recent elections.
About this Event
SCHEDULE: – Monday, November 30th
8am Doors Open
9am Start
(Adjourn for Lunch)
2pm Conclusion
The President’s legal team will be present from DC to assist in a fact finding hearing with select members of the Arizona House and Senate and a panel of experts. The goal will be to gather the evidence that justifies calling a special session to contemplate what happened and take immediate action accordingly.
“We are pleased that the State Legislatures in Pennsylvania, Arizona and Michigan will be convening hearings to examine the November 3rd presidential election,” Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump, Jenna Ellis.
State Legislatures are uniquely qualified and positioned to hold hearings on election irregularities and fraud before electors are chosen. As established in Article 2, Section 1.2 of the United States Constitution, State Legislatures have the sole authority to select their representatives to the Electoral College, providing a critical safeguard against voter fraud and election manipulation.
REGISTRATION DETAILS
Open to the Public…..Tickets are Limited!
All attendees must register in advance and secure a ticket online
Social Distancing Rules will be maintained in accordance with local guidelines including the use of facemasks
Georgia “enjoined from wiping or resetting any voting machines” Judge Tomothy C. Batten November 29, 2020, Hearing December 4, 2020
“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“F-E-L-O-N-Y. — Lin Wood Drops Late-Night Bombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”…Attorney Lin Wood
*** Update below ***
From Pearson et al v Brian Kemp et al November 29, 2020.
“Defendants are ordered to maintain the statue quo & are temporarily enjoined from wiping or resetting any voting machines in the State of Georgia until further order of the Court.”
“The court will hold a in-person hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion on Friday, December 4, at 10:00 AM, EST”
Sidney Powell GA & MI lawsuit witnesses destroy Fake News lie of no evidence, Assistant AG and numerous attorneys witnessed fraud and irregularities
“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“F-E-L-O-N-Y. — Lin Wood Drops Late-Night Bombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”…Attorney Lin Wood
You could not ask for better witnesses and evidence for election fraud lawsuits.
The following were selected for their backgrounds, expertise and the fact that they personally observed probable fraud and certain irregularities.
Michigan.
Only one is listed because this witness was an Assistant Attorney General for Michigan for 8 years!
Zachary Larsen, Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020:
“87. The GLJC Complaint alleges the Detroit Election Commission “systematically
processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets.” Exh. 3, GLJC Complaintat 3. The GLJC Complaint provides additional witness affidavits detailing the fraudulent conduct of election workers, in particular, that of Zachary Larsen, who served as a Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020 and was a certified poll challenger at the TCF Center. “Mr.
Larsen reviewed the running list of scanned in ballots in the computer system, where it appeared that the voter had already been counted as having voted. An official operating the computer then appeared to assign this ballot to a different voter as he observed a completely different name that was added to the list of voters at the bottom of a running tab of processed ballots on the right side
of the screen.” Id. at ¶ 16. Mr. Larsen observed this “practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. Id. at ¶ 17. Moreover, this appeared to be the case for the majority of the voters whose ballots he personally observed being scanned. Id.”
Poll Observer. “My background and qualifications in voting system cybersecurity are set forth in my December 16, 2019 declaration. ” “I am also an expert in ballot scanning because of extensive background in digital imaging prior by work researching election systems.”
PA judge McCullough: “Petitioners….likelihood to succeed on the merits”, Memorandum of Opinion Nov 27, “likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim”
“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell
From the
Memorandum of Opinion by Judge McCullough
Filed November 27, 2020
Petitioners appear to have established alikelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment. Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77. Since this presents an issue of law
which has already been thoroughly briefed by the parties, this Court can state that Petitioners have a likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania
Constitutional claim.
Without the emergency relief ordered by this Court, there would be the
likelihood of irreparable harm to Petitioners. As to Petitioner Kelly, although it
appears that he gained the most votes in the election for the office he seeks, that
result has yet to be certified. Further, he may suffer irreparable harm prospectively should he seek election to public office in the future. If what may be an unconstitutional mail-in voting process remains extant, such mail-in ballots may make the difference as to whether he is successful or not.
As to Petitioners Parnell and Logan, mail-in ballots may have made the
difference as to whether they have won or lost their respective elections. Hence, their fates may well turn upon the constitutionality of Act 77. The other voters in this case assert their constitutional voting rights as citizens of Pennsylvania would be irreparably harmed.
Conversely, since the relief ordered by the Court is on an emergency
basis, Respondents face no irreparable harm. In any event, the matter of irreparable harm would have been assessed at the evidentiary hearing.
The relief ordered by this Court is also in the public interest. Any
claim that the voters of this Commonwealth are disenfranchised by this Court’s order are spurious. The Order at issue does nothing more than preserve the status quo pending further and immediate review. That being said, this Court is mindful that one of the alternative reliefs noted by Petitioners would cause the
disenfranchisement of the nearly seven million Pennsylvanians who voted in the
2020 General Election. Specifically, Respondents claim that a temporary stay would disenfranchise voters as the legislature would appoint the electors to the Election College. However, as noted, the legislature is not authorized to appoint the electors to the Electoral College until December 8, the “Federal Safe Harbor” date for certifying results for presidential electors. The Court agrees it would be untenable for the legislature to appoint the electors where an election has already occurred, if the majority of voters who did not vote by mail entered their votes in accord with a constitutionally recognized method, as such action would result in the disenfranchisement of every voter in the Commonwealth who voted in this election – not only those whose ballots are being challenged due to the constitutionality of Act 77. However, this is not the only equitable remedy available in a matter which hinges upon upholding a most basic constitutional right of the people to a fair and free election. Hence, Respondents have not established that greater harm will result in providing emergency relief, than the harm suffered by the public due to the results of a purportedly unconstitutional election.5
For all of the above reasons, the Court respectfully submits that the
emergency preliminary injunction was properly issued and should be upheld pending an expedited emergency evidentiary hearing.”
MI election fraud: Zachary Larsen 8 yr assistant AG exposes fraud while AG Dana Nessel threatens whistleblowers, Sidney Powell lawsuit v Trump Derangement Syndrome
“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“The comments made accusations of racism and threatened me and members of my family,” “The Wayne County election had serious process flaws which deserve investigation. I continue to ask for information to assure Wayne County voters that these elections were conducted fairly and accurately. Despite repeated requests I have not received the requisite information and believe an additional 10 days of canvas by the State Board of canvassers will help provide the information necessary.”...Monica Palmer affidavit
The duty of Michigan Attorney Dana Nessel and indeed that of any state AG is to uphold the law.
Apparently Nessel, infected with Trump Derangement Syndrome, is unable to do her duty and instead threatens whistleblowers who are doing her job of exposing election fraud and corruption.
From Citizen Wells November 27, 2020.
“Not only did Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel not do her duties, but she attempted to cover up election fraud by trying to silence a journalist.
From One America News November 10, 2020.
“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.
“Compare the revelations in the video to the recently filed Sidney Powell lawsuit with numerous witness allegations.
The first is from Zachary Larsen, Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020:
87. The GLJC Complaint alleges the Detroit Election Commission “systematically
processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets.” Exh. 3, GLJC Complaintat 3. The GLJC Complaint provides additional witness affidavits detailing the fraudulent conduct of election workers, in particular, that of Zachary Larsen, who served as a Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020 and was a certified poll challenger at the TCF Center. “Mr.
Larsen reviewed the running list of scanned in ballots in the computer system, where it appeared that the voter had already been counted as having voted. An official operating the computer then appeared to assign this ballot to a different voter as he observed a completely different name that was added to the list of voters at the bottom of a running tab of processed ballots on the right side
of the screen.” Id. at ¶ 16. Mr. Larsen observed this “practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. Id. at ¶ 17. Moreover, this appeared to be the case for the majority of the voters whose ballots he personally observed being scanned. Id.”
AG Dana Nessel kicking off her Democratic Nominating Convention by comparing President Trump to Adolf Hitler, before joking: “Hitler, by all accounts, could read and write … and he also was brave enough to serve in his nation’s military.”
From constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley November 23, 2020.
“Democratic leaders like Michigan’s Attorney General Dana Nessel have threatened criminal prosecution against those who have posted videos alleging voting fraud and even threatened possible prosecution of legislators who meet with President Trump or raise challenges to the election results. The media is virtually silent on these threats to coerce lawyers and legislators into silence. That is not viewed as a threat to the rule of law. The threats against lawyers follows a pattern where Democratic members are calling for blacklists and others denounce any questioning of the Biden victory as akin to “Holocaust denial.” I spoke last week to Republican lawyers who described death threats, doxxing, and continual harassment for their representation in these lawsuits. The message is that if you represent the wrong side you will be denounced, doxxed, and disbarred.”
Michigan AG Dana Nessel complicit in election fraud and coverup, Sidney Powell lawsuit & numerous witnesses confirm, Threatened journalist, #DetroitLeaks video authentic?
“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“The comments made accusations of racism and threatened me and members of my family,” “The Wayne County election had serious process flaws which deserve investigation. I continue to ask for information to assure Wayne County voters that these elections were conducted fairly and accurately. Despite repeated requests I have not received the requisite information and believe an additional 10 days of canvas by the State Board of canvassers will help provide the information necessary.”...Monica Palmer affidavit
From the Michigan election statutes:
168.31 Secretary of state; duties as to elections; rules.
(h) Investigate, or cause to be investigated by local authorities, the administration of election laws, and report violations of the election laws and regulations to the attorney general or prosecuting attorney, or both,for prosecution.
168.83 Secretary of state or attorney general; impeachment; removal from office; service of charges, hearing.
remove from office for gross neglect of duty or for corrupt conduct in office, or any other misfeasance or malfeasance therein,
It is clear from the above statutes that the Attorney General of Michigan has duties related to elections and can be removed from office for “gross neglect of duty or for corrupt conduct in office, or any other misfeasance”
Not only did Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel not do her duties, but she attempted to cover up election fraud by trying to silence a journalist.
From One America News November 10, 2020.
“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.
Compare the revelations in the video to the recently filed Sidney Powell lawsuit with numerous witness allegations.
The first is from Zachary Larsen, Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020:
87. The GLJC Complaint alleges the Detroit Election Commission “systematically
processed and counted ballots from voters whose name failed to appear in either the Qualified Voter File (QVF) or in the supplemental sheets.” Exh. 3, GLJC Complaintat 3. The GLJC Complaint provides additional witness affidavits detailing the fraudulent conduct of election workers, in particular, that of Zachary Larsen, who served as a Michigan Assistant Attorney General from 2012 through 2020 and was a certified poll challenger at the TCF Center. “Mr.
Larsen reviewed the running list of scanned in ballots in the computer system, where it appeared that the voter had already been counted as having voted. An official operating the computer then appeared to assign this ballot to a different voter as he observed a completely different name that was added to the list of voters at the bottom of a running tab of processed ballots on the right side
of the screen.” Id. at ¶ 16. Mr. Larsen observed this “practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. Id. at ¶ 17. Moreover, this appeared to be the case for the majority of the voters whose ballots he personally observed being scanned. Id.”
Compare the following to revelations in the video:
“13. There were three broad categories of illegal conduct by election workers in
collaboration with other employee state, county and/or city employees and Democratic poll watchers and activists.First, to facilitate and cover-up the voting fraud and counting of fraudulent, illegal or ineligible voters, election workers:
A. Denied Republican election challengers access to the TCF Center, where all
Wayne County, Michigan ballots were processed and counted;
B. Denied Republic poll watchers at the TCF Center meaningful access to view
ballot handling, processing, or counting and locked credentialed challengers out of the counting room so they could not observe the process, during which time tens of thousands of ballots we reprocessed;
C. Engaged in a systematic pattern of harassment, intimidation and even physical removal of Republican election challengers or locking them out of the TCF Center;
D. Systematically discriminated against Republican poll watchers and favored
Democratic poll watchers;
E. Ignored or refused to record Republican challenges to the violations outlined
herein; F. Refused to permit Republican poll challengers to observe ballot duplication and other instances where they allowed ballots to be duplicated by hand without
allowing poll challengers to check if the duplication was accurate;
G. Unlawfully coached voters to vote for Joe Biden and to vote a straight Democrat ballot, including by going overtothevotingboothswithvotersinorder to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote;
H. As a result of the above, Democratic election challengers outnumbered
Republicans by 2:1 or 3:1 (or sometimes 2:0 at voting machines); and
I. Collaborated with Michigan State, Wayne County and/or City of Detroit
employees (including police) in all of the above unlawful and discriminatory
behavior.”
Georgia & Pennsylvania absentee ballot fraud exposed in lawsuits & hearings, Illegal ballots revealed, Tens of thousands found, Watermark authenticity?
“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit.”…Sidney Powell Georgia lawsuit
Pennsylvania.
From the PA Senate Majority Policy Committee.
Public Hearing on Election Issues
November 25, 2020.
Rudy Giuliani: “You sent out in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 1,823,148 absentee or mail-in ballots. You received back 1.4 million approximately. However, in the count for president, you counted 2.5 million. I don’t know what accounts for the 700,000 difference between the ballots you sent out and the number of ballots that ended up in the count,”
Are the excess ballots fake and if so will the watermark be used to authenticate?
Georgia.
From the Sidney Powell lawsuit filed November 25, 2020.
“A large number of ballots were identical and likely fraudulent. An Affiant explains that she observed a batch of utterly pristine ballots:
14. Most of the ballots had already been handled; they had been
written on by people, and the edges were worn. They showed obvious
use. However, one batch stood out. It was pristine. There was a
difference in the texture of the paper – it was if they were intended
for absentee use but had not been used for that purposes. There was
a difference in the feel.
15. These different ballots included a slight depressed pre-fold so
they could be easily folded and unfolded for use in the scanning
machines. There were no markings on the ballots to show where they
had com~ from, or where they had been processed. These stood out.
16. In my 20 years of experience of handling ballots, I observed that
the markings for the candidates on these ballots were unusually
uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device. By my estimate
in observing these ballots, approximately 98% constituted votes for
Joe Biden. I only observed two of these ballots as votes for President
Donald J. Trump.” (See Exh. 15 Attached hereto).”
“Another Affiant testified about the use of different paper for ballots, that would constitute fraud stating:
I noticed that almost all of the ballots I reviewed were for Biden.
Many batches went 100% for Biden. I also observed that the
watermark on at least 3 ballots were solid gray instead of
transparent, leading me to believe the ballot was counterfeit. I
challenged this and the Elections Director said it was a legitimate
ballot and was due to the use of different printers. Many ballots had
markings for Biden only, and no markings on the rest of the ballot.”
Are some of these ballots fake and if so will the watermark be used to authenticate?
Amistad Project Trump Georgia lawsuit John Wood v Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger et al Nov 25, 2020, Over 204k illegal votes & outside money
“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“F-E-L-O-N-Y. — Lin Wood Drops Late-Night Bombshell: “Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA?”…Attorney Lin Wood
From the Amistad Project Trump Georgia lawsuit.
John Wood v Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger et al
Filed November 25, 2020.
“The Contestant John Wood, as an aggrieved elector, brings this lawsuit against
the Defendants because state and local election administration officials have ignored statutes, interposed their own solutions for ballot security, accepted private money that casts doubt on election integrity and so mismanaged
the election process that no one can have faith that one of their most sacred rights under the United States and Georgia Constitutions, voting,
is being protected. Within the State of Georgia, private non—
profits, state officials and local elected officials acted to systematically eviscerate Georgia’s Election Law contrary to Title 21 of the Official Code of Georgia—failing to protect election integrity. Investigations have uncovered more than $350 million distributed nationwide —$6.3 million of which went to Fulton County, Georgia—and funneled through collection of non—profit organizations dictating to election officials how to manage the election.
In particular, the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) granted $6.3 million USD to Fulton County, Georgia. These unregulated private funds were predominantly used to:
(1) pay “ballot harvesters”;
(2) provide mobile ballot pick up units;
(3) deputize and pay political activists to manage ballots;
(4) pay election judges and poll workers;
(5) establish drop—boxes and satellite offices;
(6) pay local election officials and agents to recruit cities recognized as democratic strongholds to recruit other cities to apply for grants
from non—profits;
(7) consolidate counting centers in the urban core to facilitate the movement of hundreds of thousands of questionable ballots in secrecy without
legally required bi-partisan observation;
(8) initiate and implement two—tier ballot “curing” plan that illegally
counted ballots in Democrat strongholds and spoil similarly
situated ballots in Republican strongholds; and
(9) pay for and help design the plan to remove the poll watchers from one political party so that the critical responsibility of determining
the validity of the ballot and the validity of the count could be conducted without oversight.”
Sidney Powell Michigan lawsuit Timothy King et al v Gretchen Whitmer et al Nov 25, 2020, “systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballotstuffing.” ”
“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“The comments made accusations of racism and threatened me and members of my family,” “The Wayne County election had serious process flaws which deserve investigation. I continue to ask for information to assure Wayne County voters that these elections were conducted fairly and accurately. Despite repeated requests I have not received the requisite information and believe an additional 10 days of canvas by the State Board of canvassers will help provide the information necessary.”...Monica Palmer affidavit
From the Sidney Powell Michigan lawsuit.
1. This civil action brings to light a massive election fraud, multiple violations of the Michigan Election Code, see, e.g., MCL §§ 168.730-738, in addition to the Election and Electors Clauses and Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution violations that occurred during the 2020 General Election throughout the State of Michigan,1as set forth in the affidavits of dozens
of eye witnesses and the statistical anomalies and mathematical impossibilities detailed in the affidavits of expert witnesses.
2. The scheme and artifice to defraud was for the purpose of illegally and
fraudulently manipulating the vote count to manufacture an election of Joe Biden as President of the United States. The fraud was executed by many means,2 but the most fundamentally troubling, insidious, and egregious ploy was the systemic adaptation of old-fashioned “ballotstuffing.” It has now been amplified and rendered virtually invisible by computer software
created and run by domestic and foreign actors for that very purpose. This Complaint details an especially egregious range of conduct in Wayne County and the City of Detroit, though this conduct occurred throughout the State at the direction of Michigan state election officials.
3. The multifaceted schemes and artifices implemented by Defendants and their
collaborators to defraud resulted in the unlawful counting, or manufacturing, of hundreds of thousands of illegal, ineligible, duplicate or purely fictitious ballots in the State of Michigan, that constitute a multiple of Biden’s purported lead in the State. While this Complaint, and the eyewitness and expert testimony incorporated herein, identify with specificity sufficient ballots
required to overturn and reverse the election results, the entire process is so riddled with fraud, illegality, and statistical impossibility that this Court, and Michigan’s voters, courts, and legislators, cannot rely on, or certify, any numbers resulting from this election.
Dominion Voting Systems Fraud and Manipulation
4. The fraud begins with the election software and hardware from Dominion Voting Systems Corporation (“Dominion”) used by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers. The Dominion systems derive from the software designed by Smartmatic Corporation, which became Sequoia in the United States.”
Citizen WElls 
