Joe Biden Georgia speech for senate candidates Jon Ossoff & Raphael Warnock Dec 15 to empty lot, Secret Service Agents outnumber fans?, Biden won GA?
“Inaction would disenfranchise as many voters as taking action allegedly would”...Texas response to defendants motions
” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official
“We are calling upon the elections officials to engage the GBI to investigate any and all fraudulent activities, including those which were brought to light during Senate committee hearings on December 3, 2020.”…Georgia Senate Republicans December 8, 2020.
Joe Biden stumped for senate candidates Jon Ossoff & Raphael Warnock in Georgia December 15, 2020.
“Joe Biden Holds Parking Lot Rally for Ossoff and Warnock at Empty Warehouse — Photos — WHERE ARE THE PEOPLE? This Guy Got 81 Million Votes?
Joe Biden, the most popular and charismatic Democrat in world history, is holding a parking lot rally for Democrats Jon Ossoff and Rev. Raphael Warnock in Atlanta on Tuesday afternoon.
Here is Pratt Pullman Yards in Atlanta where the rally is being held today.
It looks like a condemned building.”
“Biden will headline the Dec. 15 drive-in rally for Jon Ossoff and Rev. Raphael Warnock at Pullman Yard, the Business Chronicle reported, citing Atlanta City Councilor Natalyn M. Archibong’s post on the Kirkwood Neighbors Organization Facebook page. The event, according to the post, is scheduled to run from 2:30 to 4 p.m. 11Alive reached out to the Biden team to independently verify the details, but they did not share them.”
Trump lawsuit dismissed 4 to 3 by corrupt Wisconsin Supreme Court justices, Dissenters Roggensack Ziegler & Bradley provide honest jurisprudence
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question. From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8
“We are called upon to declare what the law is. See Marbury v. Madison,
5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803) (“It is emphatically the province
and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.”).
Once again, in an all too familiar pattern, four members of this
court abdicate their responsibility to do so. They refuse to even
consider the uniquely Wisconsin, serious legal issues presented.”...Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Annette Ziegler
Trump, et al v Biden, et al was dismissed by the Wisconsin Supreme Court on December 14, 2020.
Justices Brian Hagedorn, Ann Bradley, Rebecca Dallet and Jill Karofsky concurred in the majority opinion of 4 to 3.
They must know the law but for whatever reason chose to ignore it.
The following dissenting opinions highlight that.
Patience Drake Roggensack (dissenting)
Ҧ61 PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, C.J. (dissenting).
Elections have consequences. One candidate wins and the other
loses, but in every case, it is critical that the public perceive
that the election was fairly conducted.
¶62 In the case now before us, a significant portion of the
public does not believe that the November 3, 2020, presidential
election was fairly conducted. Once again, four justices on this
court cannot be bothered with addressing what the statutes require
to assure that absentee ballots are lawfully cast. I respectfully
dissent from that decision. I write separately to address the
merits of the claims presented.1
¶63 The Milwaukee County Board of Canvassers and the Dane
County Board of Canvassers based their decisions on erroneous
advice when they concluded that changes clerks made to defective
witness addresses were permissible. And, the Dane County Board of
Canvassers erred again when it approved the 200 locations for
ballot collection that comprised Democracy in the Park. The
majority does not bother addressing what the boards of canvassers
did or should have done, and instead, four members of this court
throw the cloak of laches over numerous problems that will be
repeated again and again, until this court has the courage to
correct them. The electorate expects more of us, and we are capable of providing it.2 Because we do not, I respectfully dissent. ”
“III. CONCLUSION
¶105 The Milwaukee County Board of Canvassers and the Dane
County Board of Canvassers based their decisions on erroneous
advice when they concluded that changes clerks made to defective
witness addresses were permissible. And, the Dane County Board of Canvassers erred again when it approved the 200 locations for
ballot collection that comprised Democracy in the Park. The
majority does not bother addressing what the boards of canvassers
did or should have done, and instead, four members of this court
throw the cloak of laches over numerous problems that will be
repeated again and again, until this court has the courage to
correct them. The electorate expects more of us, and we are
capable of providing it. Because we do not, I respectfully
dissent.”
Annette Kingsland Ziegler (dissenting)
“We are
called upon to declare what the law is. See Marbury v. Madison,
5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803) (“It is emphatically the province
and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.”).
Once again, in an all too familiar pattern, four members of this
court abdicate their responsibility to do so. They refuse to even
consider the uniquely Wisconsin, serious legal issues presented.
The issues presented in this case, unlike those in other cases
around the United States, are based on Wisconsin statutory election
law. Make no mistake, the majority opinion fails to even mention,
let alone analyze, the pertinent Wisconsin statutes. Passing
reference to other states’ decisionmaking is of little relevance
given the Wisconsin legal issues at stake. See Roggensack, C.J.,
dissent, supra; Rebecca Grassl Bradley, J., dissent, infra. The
people of Wisconsin deserve an answer——if not for this election,
then at least to protect the integrity of elections in the future.
Instead of providing clarity, the majority opinion is, once again,
dismissive of the pressing legal issues presented.”
Ҧ136 Despite the fact that the majority relies on laches to
not declare the law in nearly all respects of the challenges
raised, it nonetheless segregates out the indefinitely confined
voter claim to analyze. Notably absent is any explanation why
this claim is not treated like the other challenges.
¶137 Therefore, the majority’s application of laches here is
unfortunate and doomed to create chaos, uncertainty, undermine
confidence and spawn needless litigation. Instead of declaring what the law is, the majority is legislating its preferred policy.
It disenfranchises those that followed the law in favor of those
who acted in contravention to it. This is not the rule of law; it
is the rule of judicial activism through inaction.
III. CONCLUSION
¶138 As I would not apply laches in the case at issue and
instead would analyze the statutes and available remedies as well
as the actions of the Wisconsin Elections Commission, I
respectfully dissent.”
Rebecca Grassl Bradley (dissenting)
“Once again,
the majority of the Wisconsin Supreme Court wields the
discretionary doctrine of laches as a mechanism to avoid answering
questions of law the people of Wisconsin elected us to decide.
Although nothing in the law compels its application, this majority
routinely hides behind laches in election law cases no matter when
a party asserts its claims. Whether election officials complied
with Wisconsin law in administering the November 3, 2020 election
is of fundamental importance to the voters, who should be able to
rely on the advice they are given when casting their ballots.
Rather than fulfilling its duty to say what the law is, a majority
of this court unconstitutionally converts the Wisconsin Elections
Commission’s mere advice into governing “law,” thereby supplanting
the actual election laws enacted by the people’s elected
representatives in the legislature and defying the will of
Wisconsin’s citizens. When the state’s highest court refuses to
uphold the law, and stands by while an unelected body of six
commissioners rewrites it, our system of representative government
is subverted.”
You are strongly urged to completely read the dissenting opinions.
They are powerful and should be spread throughout the land.
Wisconsin indefinitely confined ballots require audit, Supreme court belatedly clarifies, 2 opinions filed Dec 14, Why did WI court wait until day of Trump ruling?
“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question. From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8
On March 31, 2020 the Wisconsin Supreme Court filed the following ruling in Jefferson v Dane County:
“The temporary injunction the petitioners seek would order respondent, Scott McDonell, the Dane County Clerk, to remove a March 25, 2020 Facebook post in which he indicated, inter alia, that all Dane County voters could declare themselves to be “indefinitely confined” under Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2) due to illness solely because of the Wisconsin Department of Health Services Emergency
Order #12 (the Safer at Home Order) and difficulties in presenting or uploading a valid proof of identification, thereby avoiding the legal requirement to present or upload a copy of the voter’s proof of identification when requesting an absentee ballot. 1 The petitioners further ask this court
to order respondent McDonell and respondent Dane County to issue new statements setting forth the statutory interpretation proposed by the petitioners.”
In regard to clarification, the WEC has met and has issued guidance on the proper use of indefinitely confined status under Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2) in its March 29, 2020 publication, “Guidance for Indefinitely Confined Electors COVID-19.” The WEC guidance states as follows:
1. Designation of indefinitely confined status is for each individual voter to make
based upon their current circumstances. It does not require permanent or total
inability to travel outside of the residence. The designation is appropriate for
electors who are indefinitely confined because of age, physical illness or
infirmity or are disabled for an indefinite period.
2. Indefinitely confined status shall not be used by electors simply as a means to
avoid the photo ID requirement without regard to whether they are indefinitely
confined because of age, physical illness or infirmity, or disability.
We conclude that the WEC’s guidance quoted above provides the clarification on the purpose and proper use of the indefinitely confined status that is required at this time.”
ON PETITION TO BYPASS COURT OF APPEALS, REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
Filed December 14, 2020.
“The Campaign focuses its objections on four different
categories of ballots——each applying only to voters in Dane County
and Milwaukee County. First, it seeks to strike all ballots cast
by voters who claimed indefinitely confined status since March 25,
2020.”
“The challenge to the indefinitely confined voter ballots
is meritless on its face, and the other three categories of ballots
challenged fail under the doctrine of laches.”
“The Campaign does not challenge the ballots of
individual voters. Rather, the Campaign argues that all voters
claiming indefinitely confined status since the date of the
erroneous Facebook advice should have their votes invalidated,
whether they are actually indefinitely confined or not. Although
the number of individuals claiming indefinitely confined status
has increased throughout the state, the Campaign asks us to apply
this blanket invalidation of indefinitely confined voters only to
ballots cast in Dane and Milwaukee Counties, a total exceeding 28,000 votes. The Campaign’s request to strike indefinitely
confined voters in Dane and Milwaukee Counties as a class without
regard to whether any individual voter was in fact indefinitely
confined has no basis in reason or law; it is wholly without merit.”
¶10 All three of these challenges fail under the
longstanding and well-settled doctrine of laches. “Laches is
founded on the notion that equity aids the vigilant, and not those
who sleep on their rights to the detriment of the opposing party.”
State ex rel. Wren v. Richardson, 2019 WI 110, ¶14, 389
Wis. 2d 516, 936 N.W.2d 587. Application of laches is within the
court’s discretion upon a showing by the party raising the claim
of unreasonable delay, lack of knowledge the claim would be raised,
and prejudice. Id., ¶15.
¶11 For obvious reasons, laches has particular import in the
election context. As one noted treatise explains:
Extreme diligence and promptness are required in
election-related matters, particularly where actionable election practices are discovered prior to the election.
Therefore, laches is available in election challenges.
In fact, in election contests, a court especially
considers the application of laches. Such doctrine is
applied because the efficient use of public resources
demands that a court not allow persons to gamble on the
outcome of an election contest and then challenge it
when dissatisfied with the results, especially when the
same challenge could have been made before the public is
put through the time and expense of the entire election
process. Thus if a party seeking extraordinary relief
in an election-related matter fails to exercise the
requisite diligence, laches will bar the action.”
The denial of tossing out all indefinitely confined ballots seems reasonable so as not to disenfranchise valid voters.
Not sure what this means:
The challenge to the indefinitely confined voter ballots is meritless on its face”
And accusing the Trump challenge of violating the laches principle when viewed in light of the following, is interesting.
Filed also on December 14, 2020, when the oral argument was held September 29, 2020.
Jefferson, et al v Dane County, et al.
“(1) Respondents lack the authority to issue an
interpretation of Wisconsin’s election law allowing all electors
in Dane County to obtain an absentee ballot without a photo
identification and (2) Governor Evers’ Emergency Order #12
(“Emergency Order #12″) did not authorize all Wisconsin voters to
obtain an absentee ballot without a photo identification.”
“we conclude that Emergency Order #12 did not render
all Wisconsin electors “indefinitely confined,” thereby obviating
the requirement of a valid photo identification to obtain an
absentee ballot.”
“¶23 The plain language of Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2)(a) requires
that each elector make an individual assessment to determine
whether he or she qualifies as indefinitely confined or disabled
for an indefinite period. A county clerk may not “declare” that
any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic. This
conclusion is supported by two distinct, but equally important,
reasons.”
Trump likely wins Wisconsin, WI Supreme Court ruling Dec 14, “A county clerk may not “declare” that any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic.”
“We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden”…Attorney Sidney Powell
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question. From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8
Approx. 215,000 ballots were processed with the indication that the voter was “indefinitely confined,”
That is about 4 times as many cast in 2016.
The Wisconsin Supreme just ruled “A county clerk may not “declare” that any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic.”
If all of these ballots are audited, it is likely that enough should be thrown out due to clerk illegal action or outright fraud, to give the election to Trump.
From the Wisconsin Supreme Court December 14, 2020.
“B. Mootness
¶14 Respondents contend that their stipulation on questions
of law makes the issues presented herein moot. However, we are
not bound by stipulations on questions of law. State v. Olson,
127 Wis. 2d 412, 419, 380 N.W.2d 375 (Ct. App. 1985) (citing Swift
& Co. v. Hocking Valley Ry. Co., 243 U.S. 281, 289 (1917)). Rather,
we decide the legal issue at the heart of this controversy, i.e.,
the interpretation and application of Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2)(a) in
the context presented.”
“Accordingly, we choose to address the issues presented.”
“1. Individual Determination
¶23 The plain language of Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2)(a) requires
that each elector make an individual assessment to determine
whether he or she qualifies as indefinitely confined or disabled
for an indefinite period. A county clerk may not “declare” that
any elector is indefinitely confined due to a pandemic. This
conclusion is supported by two distinct, but equally important,
reasons.
¶24 First, as a fundamental matter, county clerks are not to
interpret Wisconsin’s election laws and make declarations based on
those interpretations. It is the WEC that is responsible for
guidance in the administration and enforcement of Wisconsin’s
election laws, not the county clerks.”
Ҧ25 Next, as we stated above, whether to declare oneself
indefinitely confined is an individual determination. The plain
language of the statute does not permit persons other than the
elector to make that decision. We will not add words into a
statute that the legislature did not see fit to employ. See
Dawson, 336 Wis. 2d 318, ¶42 (citing County of Dane v. LIRC, 2009
WI 9, ¶33, 315 Wis. 2d 293, 759 N.W.2d 571). Therefore, neither
county clerks nor an order of the Governor may declare persons
indefinitely confined.”
Electoral College vote must be put on hold immediately after Dominion test results public from Antrim Co, Not just a presidential vote issue, Also down ballot
“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official
The Electoral College vote must be put on hold immediately!
To continue is to commit fraud.
Dominion Voting Systems has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to be unreliable.
This is further corroborated by Colonel Phil Waldron.
DURING THE ELECTION REAL TIME.
Colonel Phil Waldron and his team of white hat techies were monitoring the election real time and collected data confirming the Dominion Voting Systems equipment was communicating with off shore sites and performing in such a way as to reveal data manipulation.
The following is his presentation in the Michigan hearing from December 1, 2020. He elaborates on what transpired in Antrim County and his revelations contradict the official narrative we were given.
Also from today’s Antrim County report:
“18. The Election Event Designer Log shows that Dominion ImageCast Precinct
Cards were programmed with new ballot programming on 10/23/2020 and then
again after the election on 11/05/2020. These system changes affect how ballots
are read and tabulated, and our examination demonstrated a significant change
in voter results using the two different programs. In accordance with the Help
America Vote Act, this violates the 90-day Safe Harbor Period which prohibits
changes to election systems, registries, hardware/software updates without
undergoing re-certification. According to the National Conference of State
Legislatures – Michigan requires full compliance with federal standards as
determined by a federally accredited voting system laboratory.
19. The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate
evidence of fraud and/or to correct program errors that would de-certify the
election. Our findings show that the Central Lake Township tabulator tape totals
were significantly altered by utilizing two different program versions (10/23/2020
and 11/05/2020), both of which were software changes during an election which
violates election law, and not just human error associated with the Dominion
Election Management System. This is clear evidence of software generated
movement of votes. The claims made on the Office of the Secretary of State
website are false.”
To continue with the Electoral College vote would be criminal.
Any state using Dominion Systems should be audited.
Remember, this is not just a presidential vote issue but also affects the down ballot.
Antrim County MI Dominion Voting Systems test results report Dec 14, 2020, Judge Elseneheimer ruling, “results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable”
“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state. On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘”…One America News November 10, 2020
From the Antrim County Michigan Dominion Voting Systems
Forensics Report
Released December 14, 2020.
4. The Antrim County Clerk and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson have stated that the election night error (detailed above by the vote “flip” from Trump to Biden, was the result of human error caused by the failure to update the Mancelona Township tabulator prior to election night for a down ballot race. We disagree and conclude that the vote flip occurred because of machine error built into the voting software designed to create error.
5. Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s statement on November 6, 2020 that “[t]the correct results always were and continue to be reflected on the tabulator totals tape . . . .” was false.
6. The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.
7. The results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable. This is a result of machine and/or software error, not human error.
8. The tabulation log for the forensic examination of the server for Antrim County from December 6, 2020consists of 15,676 individual events, of which 10,667 or 68.05% of the events were recorded errors. These errors resulted in overall tabulation errors or ballots being sent to adjudication. This high error rates proves the Dominion Voting System is flawed and does not meet state or federal election laws.
9. These errors occurred after The Antrim County Clerk provided a re-provisioned CF card with uploaded software for the Central Lake Precinct on November 6, 2020. This means the statement by Secretary Benson was false. The Dominion Voting System produced systemic errors and high error rates both prior to the update and after the update; meaning the update (or lack of update) is not the cause of errors.”
Dana Nessel radical Michigan AG intimidation threats continue, Why is she panicking over Dominion test report?, Now threatening MI attorneys
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state. On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘”…One America News November 10, 2020
“Evil and stupid is a bad combination.”…Citizen Wells
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has apparently been overly concerned about revelations of election fraud and irregularities for weeks.
Now she is apparently panicking about a report of test results of Dominion Voting Systems.
From Citizen Wells November 27, 2020.
From the Michigan election statutes:
168.31 Secretary of state; duties as to elections; rules.
(h) Investigate, or cause to be investigated by local authorities, the administration of election laws, and report violations of the election laws and regulations to the attorney general or prosecuting attorney, or both,for prosecution.
168.83 Secretary of state or attorney general; impeachment; removal from office; service of charges, hearing.
remove from office for gross neglect of duty or for corrupt conduct in office, or any other misfeasance or malfeasance therein,
It is clear from the above statutes that the Attorney General of Michigan has duties related to elections and can be removed from office for “gross neglect of duty or for corrupt conduct in office, or any other misfeasance”
Not only did Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel not do her duties, but she attempted to cover up election fraud by trying to silence a journalist.
From One America News November 10, 2020.
“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state.
“On November 23, Matthew DePerno of DePerno Law Offices, LLC filed a lawsuit on behalf of Central Lake resident William Bailey, demanding Antrim County allow a forensic investigation of the Dominion voting machines after it was discovered that thousands of ballots cast for President Trump were counted as votes for Joe Biden.”
“At 5:30 PM on Friday, December 4, 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A. Elsenheimer granted permission to William Bailey and his team of IT experts to conduct a forensic study of the 16 Dominion voting machines, tabulators, thumb drives, related software, and the Clerk’s “master tabulator.” In his court order, Bailey was also granted the ability to conduct an independent investigation of the images they obtained in their examination. According to DePerno, it would take approximately 6 to 8 hours to obtain the forensic copies, and it made sense to do the work on the weekend when most government employees and residents would not be in the building.”
“DePerno waited patiently for the results of the forensic examination of the Dominion voting machines to arrive. While he was waiting for the results, Michigan’s radical Attorney General Dana Nessel who won her election after bragging she was the best candidate for the job because she didn’t have a penis, added Michigan’s far-left, dishonest Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson to the lawsuit as a defendant on Wednesday.”
“Later today, Attorney Matthew DePerno received word that 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A Elseneheimer would hear his case. Curiously, DePerno, who filed the emergency motion, found out about the hearing when he saw an article published by the far-left Detroit Free Press at 2:13 PM. DePerno then received an email from Antrim County attorney Haider Kazim at 2:50 PM and received notice directly from the Court at 3:02 PM. According to DePerno, the hearing will take place at 8:30 AM EST on Monday.”
“MI Attorney Responsible For Forensic Examination Of 16 Dominion Machines Gets Threatening Call From MI State Bar…Radical MI AG Nessel Threatens “MI Lawyers” Supporting Trump
Tomorrow at 8:30 AM, in Michigan’s 13th Circuit Court, Judge Kevin A. Elsenheimer will decide if he will allow Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno of the DePerno Law Firm to release the Kraken.”
“On Wednesday, December 9, Matthew DePerno and his client, Mr. Bailey, waited patiently for the results of the forensic examination of the Dominion voting machines to arrive. While he was waiting for the results, Michigan’s radical Attorney General Dana Nessel, who won her election after bragging she was the best candidate for the job because she didn’t have a penis, added Michigan’s far-left, dishonest Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson to the lawsuit as a defendant.”
“Today, Michigan’s radical Attorney General Dana Nessel tweeted a warning shot directed specifically at “Lawyers who practice in Michigan,” letting them know that their oath prevents them from filing “unjust and/or frivolous actions” or from misleading the court.
Fun fact: Lawyers who practice in Michigan are required to take an oath to support the MI and US Constitutions, not to file unjust and/or frivolous actions or mislead the court. The spate of Trump lawsuits in our state violates each of these tenets. It demeans our profession.
The brave patriot and Constitutional Attorney told The Gateway Pundit that he’s curious about the timing of Nessel’s tweet, and he wonders why “Attorney General Nessel is bringing the power of the state in to threaten attorneys?” He also told us that if Nessel is aware of misconduct by another attorney and isn’t reporting it, she is actually violating her oath by not reporting it.” DePerno told The Gateway Pundit, “Nessel’s only goal is to intimidate.””
Injunctions and or decertifications must be filed in AZ GA MI NV PA WI to delay Electoral votes Dec 14, No winner determined by legal vote count, Fraud illegalities proven
“§ 8. The electors shall vote for President and Vice President, respectively, in the manner directed by the Constitution.”...US Election Law
“Electoral College electors owe an allegiance first and foremost to the US Constitution over State and political party dictates.”...Citizen Wells
“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln
The legislatures of these states must decertify the corrupt illegal vote count and/or a citizen must request an injunction to delay the Electoral College vote. There is nothing sacred about December 14 and a delay would be the clear lesser of evils.
Arizona
Georgia
Michigan
Nevada
Pennsylvania
Minnesota
Wisconsin
To do otherwise jeopardizes the integrity of the election and certainly will encourage a challenge in Congress January 6 and a potential constitutional crisis.
It is also unfair to the electors who are at the mercy of corrupt state officials.
If these electors vote, knowing full well that the results have been unconstitutionally certified, they become complicit with state officials in fraud.
Ultimately the electors have a duty to follow the US Constitution irrespective of state or political party rules.
Antrim County MI Dominion test update, Corrupt AG Nessel and SOS Benson hide results, Protective order to be lifted Monday? Guilty dogs bark loudest
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”...Eric Coomer, executive with Dominion Voting Systems
” This must be about stopping Trump”…Gabriel Sterling , GA election official
“Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has reportedly threatened a journalist for exposing voter-fraud in her state. On Tuesday, reports found Nessel sent a ‘cease and desist‘ order to Shane Trejo of Big League Politics over his reports called ‘Detroit Leaks.‘”…One America News November 10, 2020
From the Gateway Pundit article below:
“Will A Small County In Northern Michigan Be The Key To Overturning The Nation’s Election Results? America Should Find Out On Monday”
Background on Dominion Voting Systems testing and issues highlighted by Antrim County Michigan.
From Citizen Wells December 8, 2020.
“The following is a summary of major events leading up to, during and after the 2020 Election involving concerns and documented fraud tied to Dominion Voting Systems in multiple states.
As you read the following, Dominion executive Eric Coomer stated the following shortly before the election:
“Trump’s not gonna win. I made f*cking sure of that!”
That has to be taken seriously!
PRE ELECTION.
Texas tested Dominion for the third time and reported their rejection in February 2019.
“Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, said they decided not to go with Dominion software for vote counting in the 2020 election, as they had recognized there were problems with it, and it couldn’t be trusted.”
“Texas Dominion Voting Systems testing and evaluations report dated February 15, 2019.
“Re: Inspection of the Dominion Voting Systems’ Democracy Suite 5.5 conducted on January 16 and 17, 2019″
“Why on earth would we buy less-secure machines that are opposed by the voters, opposed by national security experts, at risk of being decertified right now in New York, are far more expensive than the hand-marked paper ballots, are possibly going to be decertified by the national election authorities within 2-4 years, when we’re spending, taking out a 20-year bond,” Parent said. “You start saying, ‘Why on earth would we buy these things?’
“I have been baffled, absolutely baffled. This is not a partisan issue — you don’t do voting machines on a party-line vote. This is crazy. And so I’m like, what is going on here? I’ve been given absolutely no good reason why we should buy these things. There’s not one good reason. So therefore, it just reeks of corruption — that we’re prioritizing vendors over voters.”
Colonel Phil Waldron and his team of white hat techies were monitoring the election real time and collected data confirming the Dominion Voting Systems equipment was communicating with off shore sites and performing in such a way as to reveal data manipulation.
The following is his presentation in the Michigan hearing from December 1, 2020. He elaborates on what transpired in Antrim County and his revelations contradict the official narrative we were given.
POST ELECTION.
Ware County Georgia:
“
Robb Hurst, CPA
@robbhurstCPA
·
Ware County, Ga has broken the Dominion algorithm: Using sequestered Dominion Equipment, Ware County ran a equal number of Trump votes and Biden votes through the Tabulator and the Tabulator reported a 26% lead for Biden.”
“ROBERT W. HURST, JR.CPA, BUSINESS OWNER
Robb graduated from the University of Georgia with both, his Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting, 1989, and Master of Taxation, 1990. He began his career in public accounting in 1991 at the national accounting firm KPMG Peat Marwick in Greenville, SC. In 1992, after the death of his dad’s partner, Robb and his wife Lorna journeyed home to Douglas, GA to work with Robert Hurst, Sr., until his retirement in 2004, at Hurst & Hurst CPAs, LLC.
Robb specializes in dealing with the accounting and tax problems of small businesses and their owners. He has extensive experience in the retail, restaurant, construction, healthcare and other professional industries. Other areas in which he exceeds the expertise of most is his in depth knowledge of accounting and auditing procedures and financial reporting requirements for government and nonprofits.”
Antrim County Michigan Dominion audit.
It is concerning that any test conducted now will be subject to scrubbing or altering of data and equipment.
“Sheriff asks judge to block Michigan order for clerks to delete election data”
“Michigan Attorney Gives Behind the Scenes Update on the IT Inspection of the Antrim County Dominion Machines
On November 16, several members of the MI State legislature sent a letter to Michigan’s Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson requesting that a full, independent audit of the accusations prior to the certification of the vote. This was after reviewing hundreds of sworn affidavits by GOP and Independent poll challengers and evidence of vote switching by Dominion voting machines in Antrim County, Michigan. The radical Secretary of State, who has a problem with telling the truth, ignored their request.
On November 23, Matthew DePerno of DePerno Law Offices, LLC filed a lawsuit on behalf of Central Lake resident William Bailey, demanding Antrim County allow a forensic investigation of the Dominion voting machines after it was discovered that thousands of ballots cast for President Trump were counted as votes for Joe Biden.”
“At 5:30 PM on Friday, December 4, 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A. Elsenheimer granted permission to William Bailey and his team of IT experts to conduct a forensic study of the 16 Dominion voting machines, tabulators, thumb drives, related software, and the Clerk’s “master tabulator.” In his court order, Bailey was also granted the ability to conduct an independent investigation of the images they obtained in their examination. According to DePerno, it would take approximately 6 to 8 hours to obtain the forensic copies, and it made sense to do the work on the weekend when most government employees and residents would not be in the building.”
“Mr. DePerno expects to have the results of the study sometime tomorrow. He explained the forensic images of the thumb drives and the master computer would tell if machines were connected to the internet—and if they were, who were they communicating with? DePerno said the examination would be able to determine the algorithms used by the computer and will provide the number of ballots read through the machine compared to the actual number of paper ballots.”
Citizen Wells has serious concerns about the current Antrim County audit due to the elapsed time after the election and the distrust of Dominion and election officials.
Thank God Colonel Waldron and his team monitored the election real time and did a follow up on site evaluation in Antrim County.”
“In a solidly red county in northern Michigan where Trump banners, flags, and yard signs can be found in almost every front yard, voters woke up to discover Joe Biden had walloped President Trump, only to find out shortly later that Dominion voting machines flipped thousands of votes cast for Trump to his Democratic challenger Joe Biden. The media called it a “glitch” and blamed it on human error.”
“Two more unexplainable vote counts in Antrim County also left voters stunned by the unexplainable outcome of the vote result by Dominion. In Central Lake’s School Board election, 742 votes were added to the total after a recount on November 6. (First image below)
Dominion’s vote totals showed 663 people voted in a district where there were only 6 eligible voters and only 3 of those 6 actually voted. Somehow, Dominion added 660 additional votes to the final tally.”
“DePerno waited patiently for the results of the forensic examination of the Dominion voting machines to arrive. While he was waiting for the results, Michigan’s radical Attorney General Dana Nessel who won her election after bragging she was the best candidate for the job because she didn’t have a penis, added Michigan’s far-left, dishonest Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson to the lawsuit as a defendant on Wednesday.
On Friday, Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno, who is now in possession of the initial preliminary results of the forensic examination of the Dominion voting machine, 16 CV data cards, and 16 thumb drives from the Dominion machines, filed an emergency order asking Judge Kevin Elsenheimer to lift the protective order prohibiting him from sharing the results of the inspection, calling it a matter of “national security.” In his emergency motion, DePerno reminds the judge that time is of the essence, as the deadline for electors to vote for the next President is Monday, December 14, 2020.”
“DePerno asked for the preliminary results of the election to be released to the people of Antrim Co, of the State of MI, of the USA, and to the President and Vice President of the United States, as well as Chad Wolf, Sec. of Homeland Security and DNI John Ratcliff.”
“Later today, Attorney Matthew DePerno received word that 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A Elseneheimer would hear his case. Curiously, DePerno, who filed the emergency motion, found out about the hearing when he saw an article published by the far-left Detroit Free Press at 2:13 PM. DePerno then received an email from Antrim County attorney Haider Kazim at 2:50 PM and received notice directly from the Court at 3:02 PM. According to DePerno, the hearing will take place at 8:30 AM EST on Monday.”
Arizona Electoral College Electors and AZ legislature warning, Voting for candidate chosen by fraudulent certification is fraud, Injunction required
“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State
“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show
“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis
The 2020 election proceedings in Arizona have been governed by fraud from start to finish in the illegal certification of votes, knowing full well the results are not valid. That only legal ballots were counted.
The top election official in Arizona, the Secretary of State, Katie Hobbs, is biased, a Trump and Trump follower hater.
Another indication of Katie Hobbs sincerity level and lack of adhering to the US Constitution was the “certiification” of votes in the middle of a hearing that exposed fraud and irregularities in the AZ election. In the photo she does an elbow bump with corrupt Governor Ducey.
Fortunately Arizona has an honest Attorney General, Mark Brnovich. Mr. Brnovich filed an Amicus brief in support of the Texas US Supreme Court lawsuit.
“The State of Arizona will first argue that election integrity is of paramount
importance. “Every voter” in a federal election “has a right under the Constitution to have his [or her] vote fairly counted, without its being distorted by fraudulently cast votes.” Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211, 227 (1974). Given this paramount importance, the State of Arizona, through its Attorney General, vigilantly fights to ensure election integrity, including for the 2020 election. The Attorney General participated in eight different suits to defend from attack Arizona election laws that were enacted by its Legislature. Indeed, in just a few months, the State of Arizona and its Attorney General will appear before this Court in the critical case of Brnovich et al. v. Democratic National Committee et al., No. 19-1257, and urge the Court to adopt a construction of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act that not only follows the text of that statute but also recognizes that to ensure “fair and honest” elections marked by “order, rather than chaos,” “there must be a substantial regulation of elections.” Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 (1974) (emphasis added); see also Smiley v. Holm, 285 U.S. 355, 366 (1932) (“[E]xperience shows” those “necessary” regulations include not just voting “procedure[s]” but also “safeguards” for the “prevention of fraud and corrupt practices.”). ”
Arizona Election Integrity Hearing November 30, 2020.
Arizona State Rep. Mark Finchem November 30, 2020.
“We are clawing our electoral college votes back, we will not release them. That’s what I’m calling our colleagues in both the House and the Senate to do,” added Finchem. “Exercise our plenary authority under the U.S. Constitution.”
Dr. Kelli Ward, Chair Woman of the Arizona GOP, recently sampled 100 ballots and found a 3 % error that favored Biden over Trump.
A subsequent sample of over 1500 ballots found a discrerpancy greater than the percentage difference in the election total.
That case is still before the Arizona Supreme Court.
From the Arizona legislature press release December 4, 2020 calling for an audit of Dominion software and equipment used by Maricopa County.
“Senate President Karen Fann and Speaker of the House Rusty Bowers today called an independent audit of the Dominion software and equipment used by Maricopa County in the 2020 General Election. The two leaders, along with incoming Senate Government Chair Michelle Ugenti-Rita and House Majority Leader Warren Petersen, had numerous phone calls with members of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors,”
“A significant number of voters believe that fraud occurred and with the number of irregularities it is easy to understand why. Especially concerning are the allegations made surrounding the vendor Dominion.”
Citizen WElls 
