Category Archives: Congress

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Obama on ballot, Obama not qualified to be president, State statutes, US Constitution, Obama Indonesian, NC State Board of Elections, Contact state boards of election

I contacted the NC Board of Elections this morning and asked if they
were aware of the Philip J Berg lawsuit that states that Barack Obama
is an Indonesian citizen, an illegal alien and not eligible to run
for president. I was told they had been aware of the lawsuit for several
months. I was also told they get their cue from the DNC. The gentleman
that I spoke to mentioned the case that was dismissed against John McCain.
These two cases are totally different. One huge difference is that John
McCain provided a vault version of his birth certificate to congress.
Obama filed a motion to dismiss the Berg lawsuit instead of proving
citizenship. The gentleman did not allow me to speak at first but did
listen for a brief moment. I told him that I would be posting about
this. I included a subchapter of NC law that pertains to replacing
candidates that are disqualified.

So, what is the primary source of determining qualifications to be
president? The US Constitution.

I am requesting that all of you, the citizens of the US, look up the laws
in your state regarding a candidate being on the ballot and email and
call your state board of elections. Here is the email that I sent to the
NC State Board of Elections:

“What I am about to share is serious and not a joke.
I am going to post this on my blog.
You may or may not be aware of the lawsuit filed by Philip J Berg
in federal court on August 21, 2008. Mr. Berg states that Obama
is not qualified to be president. I helped break this story and I am
in contact with Mr. Berg. He is trying to avoid a constitutional
crisis.
 
Here is a subchapter from the NC statues:
 
(Changes effective January 1, 2007)
§ 163-114. Filling vacancies among party nominees occurring
after nomination and before election.
If any person nominated as a candidate of a political
party for one of the offices listed below (either in a primary
or convention or by virtue of having no opposition in a primary)
Current through September 7, 2008
Page 118 of 429
dies, resigns, or for any reason becomes ineligible or
disqualified before the date of the ensuing general election,
the vacancy shall be filled by appointment according to the
following instructions:
Position
President vacancy is to be filled by
Vice President appointment of national
executive committee of
political party in which
vacancy occurs

I am a NC voter.

Citizen Wells”

Make sure that you document your inquiry with date and time stamps.

Citizen Wells

Philip J Berg, October 6, 2008, Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, Obama Indonesian, DNC, FEC, the fraudulent tactics of Obama, citizenship status

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Here is the text of the Philip J Berg Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. The PDF version can be found here:
http://www.americasright.com/

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE ::

Plaintiff,

 

:

vs.

 

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-CV-4083:

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, a/k/a :

BARRY SOETORO, a/k/a :

BARRY OBAMA, a/k/a : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

BARACK DUNHAM, a/k/a :

BARRY DUNHAM; THE :

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL :

COMMITTEE; THE FEDERAL :

ELECTION COMMISSION; THE :

SECRETARY OF THE :

COMMONWEALTH, :

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF :

STATE; PEDRO A, CORTÉS, :

Secretary of the Commonwealth in his :

Official Capacity; DIANE FEINSTEIN, :

Chairman of the U.S. Senate, :

Commission on Rules and :

Administration in her Official capacity; :

U.S. SENATE, COMMISSION ON :

RULES AND ADMINISTRATION; and :

DOES 1-50 INCLUSIVE ::

 

Defendants. :

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

FOR DECLARTORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

1. Article II, Section I of the United States Constitution, states in particular part, “No

Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of

the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither

shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of

thirty five Years, and been Fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

2

2. “The general doctrine of our Constitution is, that the executive power of the nation is

vested in the President; subject only to the exceptions and qualifications, which are

expressed in the instrument.” 7 Works of Alexander Hamilton, J. C. Hamilton ed.

(New York: 1851), 76, 80–81 (emphasis in original), U.S. Constitution, Article II

(Hamilton and Madison.)

3. Plaintiff is a life long Democrat who had always been proud of his Party. Plaintiff is

a licensed attorney in good standing and has taken an oath to uphold the United States

Constitution. Plaintiff has donated money and billable hours to Democratic

Presidential candidates as well as to the Democratic National Committee. Plaintiff

has relied on the Democratic National Committee’s [hereinafter “DNC”] promises to

uphold our Constitution, which includes properly vetting our Presidential Nominee

and ensuring our Party’s Nominee is eligible to serve as President of the United

States pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of our United States Constitution.

4. Plaintiff has trusted the Federal Election Commission [hereinafter “FEC”] that they

would ensure our Presidential and Congressional candidates are eligible for the

positions which they were seeking and running a fair and legitimate campaign

process. Plaintiff has relied on the FEC, DNC and all our Elected Office Holders to

uphold our Constitution and to ensure an illegal alien and/or a naturalized citizen

would not be able to secure the position of President of the United States.

5. The Democratic National Party is supposed to represent Democratic Americans in

seeking Honest Leadership, Open Government, Real Security, Energy Independence,

Economic Prosperity, Educational Excellence, a Healthcare System that works for

Everyone and Retirement Security. The Democratic Party is supposed to represent

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

3

and protect the interests of working Americans and guaranteeing personal liberties for

all. This includes securing a Democratic Nominee on the Presidential Election ballot

who represents the Democratic vision and who is qualified and eligible to run for

Office of the President pursuant to the qualifications of the United States

Constitution.

6. The actions of Barack Hussein Obama [hereinafter “Obama”], a U.S. Senator, in

running for President of the United States, knowing he is not eligible, have been

taken entirely without authorization under the United States Constitution, completely

ignoring the qualification and procedures created by the United States Constitution he

is purporting to enforce.

7. Should Obama be elected into the Office of the Presidency based on a fraudulent

scheme by way of malfeasance and negligence on his part failing to reveal material

information and evidence proving his ineligibility as a result of his non-citizenship or

non “natural born” status his election into Office of the President will be declared

void. Plaintiff as well as other Democratic Americans will suffer Irreparable Harm as

they will have been deprived of their right to cast their vote for an eligible

Democratic Presidential Nominee who can secure the Office of the President of the

United States.

8. Moreover, Obama and his campaign brought in donations in excess of $450 Million

Dollars by fraudulent means.

9. The DNC, FEC, Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth, Department of State

and the U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and Administration have allowed

Obama’s fraudulent scheme and failed to take any action to protect Plaintiff and/or

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

4

other American citizens. The DNC, FEC, Pennsylvania Secretary of the

Commonwealth, Department of State and U.S. Senate on Rules and Administration

refused to investigate Obama’s eligibility to hold the Office of the Presidency and

refused to comply with the Freedom of Information Act [hereinafter “FOIA”] and

turn over documents, which were demanded to prove Obama’s eligibility to hold the

Office of the Presidency to Plaintiff and the American Citizens.

10. Furthermore, the Secretary of the Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Department of State,

should have never allowed Obama on the ballot without the proper verification that

Obama was eligible to serve as the President of the United States. The Pennsylvania

Secretary of the Commonwealth, Department of State, has refused to supply

documents pertinent to satisfy Plaintiff and other voter’s doubts regarding Obama’s

eligibility.

11. There are unanswered questions as to where Obama was actually born, in the United

States or abroad, registering his birth in Hawaii. There are further unanswered

questions regarding Obama’s United States Citizenship, if he ever held such, being

expatriated and his failure to regain his citizenship by taking the oath of allegiance

once he turned eighteen (18) years of age. There are additional unanswered questions

regarding Obama’s “natural” citizenship status in Indonesia and if in fact Obama ever

took the steps necessary and filed the appropriate immigration paperwork to become

a “naturalized” citizen of the United States. Furthermore, there are unanswered

questions into Obama’s multi citizenships with foreign countries, which he still

maintains. To date, Obama has refused to prove he is qualified under the U.S.

Constitution and his eligibility to run as President of the United States.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

5

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

12. This case arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States and presents a

federal question within this Court’s jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution

and 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

13. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343. Civil rights and elective

franchise.

14. This court has further jurisdiction pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 702

15. This Court has authority to grant declaratory relief pursuant to the Declaratory

Judgment Act, 28 U.S. C. § 2201.

16. Venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).

PARTIES

17. Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire [hereinafter “Plaintiff”], is an adult individual with a

business address of 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12, Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-

2531.

18. Defendant, Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a

Barack Dunham, a/k/a Barry Dunham [hereinafter “Obama”] is an adult individual

with an office address of 713 Hatch, Senate Office Building, Washington D.C.

19. Defendant, The Democratic National Committee [hereinafter “DNC”] is a

corporation with a principal address of 430 S. Capitol Street SE, Washington, DC

20003.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

6

20. Defendant, The Federal Election Commission [hereinafter “FEC”] was created in

1975 by Congress to administer and enforce the Federal Election Campaign Act

[hereinafter “FECA”]. The FEC is a Governmental Agency with a principal address

of 999 E Street, NW, Washington, DC 20463.

21. Defendant, Secretary of the Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Department of State,

Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation, is a State Governmental Agency

over the Pennsylvania Commonwealth’s electoral process as well as Campaign

Finance, Commissions and Legislation with a principal address of 210 N. Office

Building, Harrisburg, PA 17120.

22. Defendant, Pedro A. Cortés, [hereinafter “Cortés”] sued here in his official capacity,

serves as Secretary of the Commonwealth, for the Pennsylvania Department of State,

located at 210 N. Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17120, and has primary authority

over the Pennsylvania Commonwealth’s electoral process as well as Campaign

Finance, Commissions and Legislation.

23. Defendant, The U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and Administration is a

Governmental Agency responsible for investigations into the qualifications of the

President and Vice President candidates Federal elections. The U.S. Senate,

Commission on Rules and Regulations is a Governmental Agency with a principal

address of 305 Russell Building, United States Senate, Washington D.C. 20510.

24. Defendant, Diane Feinstein, [hereinafter “Feinstein”] sued here in her official

capacity as Chairman of the U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and Administration

located at 305 Russell Building, United States Senate, Washington D.C. 20510 and

has primary authority overseeing the ethics, campaign and election reform.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

7

STANDING

25. Plaintiff has standing to bring suit against Defendants pursuant to the following:

(1) Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to 5 United States Code. §702;

(2) Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to

 

FEC v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998);(3) Plaintiff has Standing Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1481(b);

(4) Plaintiff has Standing under 5 U.S.C. §552, et seq. (FOIA);

(5) Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1343, Civil Rights

and Elective Franchise;

(6) Plaintiff has Standing under the Promissory Estoppel Doctrine; and

(7) Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to Federal Question Jurisdiction.

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

26. Since the beginning of the U.S. Constitution, in order to run for Office of the

President, you must be a “natural born citizen” U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section

1.

27. The DNC has pledged and promised Plaintiff and all Democratic individuals they

believe that our Constitution, our courts, our institutions and our traditions are proper

and work.

28. The DNC pledged and promised Plaintiff and all Democratic individuals they will

ensure our Constitution is not a nuisance and have assured Plaintiff and democratic

individuals the United States Constitution is the foundation of our democracy. It

makes freedom and self-governance possible and helps to protect our security. The

Democratic Party has pledged and promised Plaintiff and other Democratic

individuals they will maintain and restore our Constitution to its proper place in our

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

8

government and return our Nation to the best traditions, including their commitment

to government by law.

29. Based on the DNC’s promises and assurances, Plaintiff and other democratic

individuals have donated money in good faith to the DNC and other Democratic

Presidential Nominees. Money donated to the DNC is used to

 

plan the Party’squadrennial presidential nominating convention; promote the election of eligible

Party candidates, pursuant to the United States Constitution, Article II, Section I, with

both technical and financial support; and works with national, state and local party

organizations, elected officials, candidates and constituencies to respond to the needs

and views of the Democratic electorate and the nation.

30.

 

The Democratic National Party is supposed to represent Democratic Americans inseeking Honest Leadership, Open Government, Real Security, Energy Independence,

Economic Prosperity, Educational Excellence, a Healthcare System that works for

Everyone and Retirement Security. The Democratic Party is supposed to represent

and protect the interests of working Americans and guaranteeing personal liberties for

all. This includes securing a Democratic Nominee on the Presidential Election ballot

who represents the Democratic vision and who is qualified and eligible to run for

Office of the President pursuant to the qualifications of the United States

Constitution.

31. The FEC is the independent regulatory agency charged with administering and

enforcing the federal campaign finance law. The FEC has jurisdiction over the

financing of campaigns for the U.S. House, the U.S. Senate, the Presidency and the

Vice Presidency. The FEC is also responsible for the Administration, enforcement,

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

9

and formulation of policy; exclusive jurisdiction of civil enforcement; Congressional

authorities or functions with respect to elections for Federal office.

32. The PA Department of State is under the leadership of the Secretary of the

Commonwealth, Pedro A. Cortés, and the mission of the Department of State is to

promote the integrity of the electoral process.

33. Secretary of the Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Department of State, Bureau

of Commissions, Elections and Legislation oversees the Commonwealth’s electoral

process as well as Campaign Finance, Voter Registration, Office of Notary Public,

Commissions and Legislation. The U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and

Administration also carries the responsibility of investigating any corrupt practices of

our politicians. They are responsible for verifying the credentials and qualifications

of Members of the Senate, contested elections and acceptance of incompatible

offices. Moreover, in addition to the verification of a candidates qualifications,

eligibility and credentials, they are responsible for Federal elections generally,

including the election of the President, Vice President and Members of the Congress.

34. The U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and Regulations has failed to perform their

duties in verifying and investigating Obama’s citizenship status and his eligibility.

35. In vetting the Presidential candidate, among other things, the PA Department of State,

Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation, the DNC and FEC are required to

ensure the eligibility requirements pursuant to our Constitution are met and the

Presidential nominee, if elected, is qualified and eligible to serve pursuant to our

United States Constitution.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

10

36. Obama is a representative of the Democratic People. However, Obama must meet

the Qualifications specified for the United States Office of the President, which he

must be a “natural born” citizen. Additionally, Obama must be at least a

“naturalized” citizen to hold his Office of U.S. Senator for Illinois. Unfortunately,

Obama is not a “natural born” citizen, nor is he a “naturalized” citizen. Just to name

one of the problems, Obama lost his U.S. citizenship when his mother married an

Indonesian citizen, Lolo Soetoro who legally “acknowledged” Obama as his son in

Indonesia and/or “adopted” Obama, which caused Obama to become a “natural”

Indonesian citizen. Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro relocated herself and Obama to

Indonesia wherein Obama’s mother naturalized in Indonesia. This is proven by

Obama’s school record with the student’s name as “Barry Soetoro”, Father’s name:

Lolo Soetoro, M.A., and Citizenship: Indonesia.

37. There appears to be no question that Defendant Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann

Dunham, was a U.S. citizen. It is also undisputed, however, that his father, Barack

Obama, Sr., was a citizen of Kenya. Obama’s parents, according to divorce records,

were married on or about February 2, 1961.

38. Defendant Obama claims he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961 and it

is uncertain in which hospital he claims to have been born. Obama’s grandmother on

his father’s side, his half-brother and half-sister all claim Obama was born not in

Hawaii but in Kenya. Reports reflect that Obama’s mother traveled to Kenya during

her pregnancy; however, she was prevented from boarding a flight from Kenya to

Hawaii at her late stage of pregnancy (which, apparently, was a normal restriction, to

avoid births during a flight). By these reports, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama gave

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

11

birth to Obama in Kenya, after which she flew home and registered Obama’s birth.

There are records of a “registry of birth” for Obama, on or about August 8, 1961 in

the public records office in Hawaii.

39. Upon investigation into the alleged birth of Obama in Honolulu, Hawaii, Obama’s

birth is reported as occurring at two (2) separate hospitals, Kapiolani Hospital and

Queens Hospital. The Rainbow Edition News Letter, November 2004 Edition,

published by the Education Laboratory School did a several page article of an

interview with Obama and his half-sister, Maya. The Rainbow Edition News Letter

reports Obama was born August 4, 1961 at Queens Medical Center in Honolulu,

Hawaii. More interesting in February 2008, Obama’s half-sister, Maya, was again

interviewed in the Star Bulletin, and this time, Maya states Obama was born August

4, 1961 in Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women & Children.

40. Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges a research team went to Mombassa,

Kenya, and located a Certificate Registering the birth of Barack Obama, Jr. to his

father, a Kenyan citizen and his mother, a U.S. citizen.

41. Even if Obama was, in fact, born in Hawaii, he lost his U.S. citizenship when his

mother re-married and moved to Indonesia with her Indonesian husband. In or about

1965, when Obama was approximately four (4) years old, his mother, Stanley Ann

Dunham, married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia, whom she had met at the

Hawaii University, and moved to Indonesia with Obama. Obama lost his U.S.

citizenship, when his mother married Lolo Soetoro, and took up citizenship of and

residency in Indonesia. Loss of citizenship, in these circumstances, under U.S. law

(as in effect in 1965) required that foreign citizenship be achieved through

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

12

“application.” Such type of naturalization occurred, for example, when a person

acquired a foreign nationality by marriage to a national of that country. Nationality

Act of 1940, Section 317(b). A minor child follows the naturalization and citizenship

status of their custodial parent. A further issue is presented that Obama’s Indonesian

stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, either signed an acknowledgement acknowledging Obama

as his son or Lolo Soetoro adopted Obama, giving Obama natural Indonesia

citizenship which explains the name Barry Soetoro and his citizenship listed as

Indonesian.

42. Obama admits in his book, ”

 

Dreams from my father” Obama’s memoir(autobiography), that after his mother and Lolo Soetoro were married, Lolo Soetoro

left Hawaii rather suddenly and Obama and his mother spent months in preparation

for their move to Indonesia. Obama admits when he arrived in Indonesia he had

already been enrolled in an Indonesia school and his relatives were waiting to meet

him and his mother. Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian State citizen, could not have

enrolled Obama in school unless Lolo Soetoro signed an acknowledgement

acknowledging Obama as his son, which had to be filed with the Government. Under

Indonesian law, when a male acknowledges a child as his son, it deems the son, in

this case Obama, as an Indonesian State citizen. Constitution of Republic of

Indonesia, Law No. 62 of 1958 Law No. 12 of 2006 dated 1 Aug. 2006 concerning

Citizenship of Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 9 of 1992 dated 31 Mar. 1992

concerning Immigration Affairs and Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab Undang-undang

Hukum Perdata) (KUHPer) (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie) states in pertinent

part,

 

State citizens of Indonesia include: (viii) children who are born outside of legalZ:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

13

marriage from foreign State citizen mother who are acknowledged by father who is

Indonesian State citizen as his children and that acknowledgment is made prior to

children reaching 18 years of age or prior to marriage;

 

Republic of IndonesiaConstitution 1945,

 

As amended by the First Amendment of 1999, the SecondAmendment of 2000, the Third Amendment of 2001 and the Fourth Amendment of

2002,

 

Chapter X, Citizens and Residents, Article 26 states, “(1) Citizens shall consistof indigenous Indonesian peoples and persons of foreign origin who have been

legalized [sic] as citizens in accordance with law. (2) Residents shall consist of

Indonesian citizens and foreign nationals living in Indonesia

 

.”43. Furthermore, under the Indonesian adoption law, once adopted by an Indonesian

citizen, the adoption severs the child’s relationship to the birth parents,

 

and theadopted child is given the same status as a natural child, Indonesian Constitution,

Article 2. Thus, where Obama was actually born and what his mother’s citizenship

status at the time of this birth is irrelevant.

44. The laws in Indonesia at the time of Obama’s arrival did not allow dual citizenship.

If an Indonesian citizen married a foreigner, as in this case, Obama’s mother was

required to renounce her U.S. citizenship and was sponsored by her Indonesian

spouse. During this time, Indonesia was a Police State. The public schools did not

allow foreign students, only citizens were allowed to attend as Indonesia was under

strict rule and decreed a number of restrictions; therefore, in order for Obama to have

attended school in Jakarta, which he did, he had to be a citizen of Indonesia, as the

citizenship status of enrolled students was verified with Government records.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

14

45. Obama was enrolled by his parents in a public school, Fransiskus Assisi School, a

public school, in Jakarta, Indonesia. Plaintiff has received copies of the school

registration in which it clearly states Obama’s name as “Barry Soetoro,” and lists his

citizenship as Indonesian. Obama’s father is listed as Lolo Soetoro, Obama’s date of

birth and place of birth are listed as August 4, 1961 in Hawaii, and Obama’s Religion

is listed as Islam. This document was verified by

 

Inside Edition, whose reporter,Matt Meagher, took the actual footage of the school record. At the time Obama was

registered the public schools obtained and verified the citizenship status and name of

the student through the Indonesian Government. All Indonesian students were

required to carry government identity cards, or

 

Karty Tanda Pendudaks, as well asfamily card identification called a

 

Kartu Keluarga. The Kartu Keluarga is a familycard which bears the legal names and citizenship status of all family members.

46. Since Obama’s birth was legally acknowledged by Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian

citizen, and/or Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, which the evidence supports,

Obama became an Indonesian citizen

 

and bears the status as an Indonesia naturalchild (natural-born). For this reason, Obama would have been required to file

applications with the U. S. State Department and follow the legal procedures to

become a naturalized citizen in the United States, when he returned from Indonesia.

If Obama and/or his family failed to follow these procedures, then Obama is an

illegal alien.

47. Regardless of whether Obama was officially adopted, (which required a Court

process), by his Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, or his birth was acknowledged

(which only required the signing of a governmental birth acknowledgement form),

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

15

by Lolo Soetoro, one of which had to occur in order for Obama to have the name

Barry Soetoro and his citizenship status listed as “Indonesian”, in either and/or both

cases Obama’s name was required to be changed to the Indonesian father’s name, and

Obama became a natural citizen of Indonesia. This is proven by the school records

in Jakarta, Indonesia showing Obama’s name as Barry Soetoro and his citizenship as

Indonesian.

 

Again, the registration of a child in the public schools in Jakarta,Indonesia was verified with the Government Records on file with the Governmental

Agencies.

48.

 

The Indonesian citizenship law was designed to prevent apatride (stateless) orbipatride (dual citizenship). Indonesian regulations recognize neither apatride nor

bipatride citizenship.

49.

 

In addition, since Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship neither did the UnitedStates, Hague Convention of 1930.

50. In or about 1971, Obama’s mother sent Obama back to Hawaii. Obama was ten (10)

years of age upon his return to Hawaii.

51. As a result of Obama’s Indonesia “natural” citizenship status, there is absolutely

 

noway Obama could have ever regained U.S. “natural born” status, if he in fact ever

held such. Obama could have

 

only become naturalized if the proper paperwork wasfiled with the U.S. State Department, in which case, Obama would have received a

Certification of Citizenship.

52. Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges Obama was never naturalized in

the United States after his return. Obama was ten (10) years old when he returned to

Hawaii to live with his grandparents. Obama’s mother did not return with him, and

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

16

therefore, unable to apply for citizenship of Obama in the United States. If

citizenship of Obama had ever been applied for, Obama would have a Certification of

Citizenship.

53. Furthermore, Obama traveled to Indonesia, Pakistan and Southern India in 1981. The

relations between Pakistan and India were extremely tense and Pakistan was in

turmoil and under martial law. The country was filled with Afghan refugees; and

Pakistan’s Islamist-leaning Interservices Intelligence Agency (ISI) had begun to

provide arms to the Afghan mujahideen and to assist the process of recruiting

radicalized Muslim men–jihadists–from around the world to fight against the Soviet

Union. Pakistan was so dangerous that it was on the State Department’s travel ban

list for US Citizens. Non-Muslim visitors were not welcome unless sponsored by

their embassy for official business. A Muslim citizen of Indonesia traveling on an

Indonesian passport would have success entering Indonesia, Pakistan and India.

Therefore, it is believed Obama traveled on his Indonesian passport entering the

Countries. Indonesian passports require renewal every five (5) years. At the time of

Obama’s travels to Indonesia, Pakistan and India, Obama was twenty (20) years old.

If Obama would have been a U.S. citizen, which he was not, 8 USC §1481(a)(2)

provides loss of nationality by native born citizens upon “taking an oath or making an

affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state…after having

attained the age of eighteen years”, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1401(a)(1). Since Lolo

Soetoro legally acknowledged Obama as his son and/or adopted Obama, Obama

was a “natural” citizen of Indonesia, as proven by Obama’s school record.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

17

54. Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges Obama stated his citizenship as a

“Kenya Citizen” when he applied for and was accepted at Columbia University.

Obama has refused to release any records from Occidental College, Columbia

University, Harvard Law School and any of his medical records.

55. Plaintiffs as well as many other democratic American citizens have requested proof

of Obama’s citizenship status, however to no avail. Obama has promised to be an

open and honest candidate, however, refuses to remove any doubts from Plaintiff’s

and all the other democratic minds and prove his eligibility to serve as President of

the United States.

56. Plaintiff’s civil rights under the due process rights and equal protection of the laws

secured by the U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth (14 ) Amendment

 

th have been violated byObama’s illegal campaign and will continue to be violated if Obama is allowed to

continue his campaign and if elected, assume the position of President of the United

States. The DNC and FEC have allowed Obama to continue his campaigning,

knowing these issues have arisen and have failed to take and/or instigate the proper

investigation into said matters to protect Plaintiff and other registered voters.

Therefore, the only option Plaintiff had to secure and protect his civil rights was to

bring action before this Honorable Court. Moreover, our laws which protect Plaintiff,

a legal registered voter, and other registered voters from fraudulent campaign

schemes have been violated by the Defendants, 2 U.S.C. §437c, 2 U.S.C §437(g).

Plaintiff has standing to bring suit pursuant to 5 U.S. C §702, as well as 8 U.S. C

§1481(b).

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

18

57. Plaintiff’s rights guaranteed under the Liberty clause of the Fourteenth (14

 

th)Amendment of the United States Constitution have already been violated. It has been

announced in the main stream media that Obama’s “briefing” has already begun into

our National Secrets, our Nations Top Secrets, which Obama is not privy too and in

violation of our National Security, as Obama is not a legal citizen of the United

States. This has placed Plaintiff and other citizens of the United States in grave

danger. Plaintiff’s Liberty as guaranteed will further be violated if Obama is allowed

to be voted into and assume the position of President of the United States; Plaintiff

will be further damaged and is in serious jeopardy.

58. Plaintiff filed the within action on or about August 21, 2008 against Defendants

seeking Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, declaring Obama an illegal alien and/or

only a “naturalized” citizen ineligible to serve as President of the United States and

enjoining the PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections and

Legislation, the DNC and FEC from placing Obama’s name on the ballot and

prohibiting Obama from further campaigning to be elected as President of the United

States, a position he is ineligible to hold.

59. Plaintiff faxed a copy of the original complaint to Obama, the DNC and FEC on

August 22, 2008 prior to the hearing on the TRO before this Honorable Court.

Defendants were further served by personal service on September 4, 2008. Neither

the DNC nor Obama have supplied any type of proof of Obama’s citizenship status

and/or eligibility to serve as President of the United States.

60. Plaintiff has asked for a simple resolution. Plaintiff has asked that Obama supply a

genuine certified copy of his original long version “vault” Birth Certificate, A

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

19

Certification of Citizenship and a certified copy of his Oath of Allegiance. If in fact

Obama can prove his “natural born” citizenship status, which he

 

cannot, then he hasnot been prejudiced in anyway, but instead Plaintiff has been protected and his civil

rights secured. However, if Obama is unable to supply said documentation, then he

needs to withdraw his candidacy, again which will eliminate Plaintiff’s deprivations

and instill Plaintiff’s constitutionally protected safeguards and rights.

61. There is absolutely

 

no other way for Plaintiff to ensure his constitutionally protectedrights. The only option Plaintiff had was to bring this action. This is the first time in

American History a “naturalized” citizen and/or illegal alien have been allowed to

campaign for the Office of President of the United States. There are not any other

ways to establish or determine the legal status of our Presidential Candidates, whether

Republican and/or Democratic. The FEC and DNC have refused to verify and

furnish Plaintiff with Obama’s eligibility or lack thereof. Plaintiff has standing to

challenge any person(s) citizenship and/or nationality status pursuant to statute, 8

U.S. C. §1481(b).

62. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) does not perform background checks

and/or verify their eligibility on our Candidates to hold Office. According to the FBI,

once a candidate is voted into Office of Congress, they are members of Congress and

therefore they are given a Secret Clearance, again, without any type of background

check and/or verification processes performed.

63. Plaintiff, as well as other Democratic voters have and are suffering the total loss of

confidence in the DNC primary process because of the massive cheating and

skewering of rules to make an illegitimate ineligible candidate the nominee in

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

20

violation of DNC rules and the U.S. Constitution, robbing voters of their voices and

votes. Plaintiff and millions of other Democratic voters have lost all trust in the

integrity of the PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections and

Legislation, the FEC and Democratic Party leaders by the total failure of the DNC to

perform the most basic of functions by insisting any candidates produce

basic documents in vetting their eligibility, especially after there were repeated

requests demanding Obama’s eligibility be proven with certified legitimate

documents which had not been forged. This failure to perform even the most basic of

due diligence has shattered Plaintiff’s faith, along with millions of

Democratic voters, in the Democratic system.

64. Plaintiff has been damaged financially for all monies donated, billable hours spent

supporting the Democratic candidates, taxes paid by Plaintiff which went to the

Secret Service for their protection of Obama for the past twenty (20) months and for

the financial costs and time expended of this litigation, when Defendants could have

very easily investigated, verified and obtained proof of Obama’s eligibility to serve as

President of the United States, if in fact he is eligible.

65. Plaintiff has suffered damage to his reputation and discrimination as a result of

attempting to protect his rights and verify the eligibility of Obama to serve as

President of the United States. Plaintiff has been repeatedly called a racist and

verbally assaulted for bringing forward this lawsuit against Obama. Plaintiff is not a

racist and is a paid Life Member of the NAACP. Obama himself stated to a crowd of

his supporters,

 

“I need you to go out and talk to your friends and talk to yourneighbors. I want you to talk to them whether they are independent or whether they

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

21

are Republican. I want you to argue with them and get in their face”

 

, as quoted in anewspaper article published in the San Francisco Gate, by Kathleen Hennessey,

Associated Press Writer, on September 17, 2008. Obama is promoting attacks on

non-supporters, which is creating racial tension and violence in our communities, of

which Plaintiff has been victim too.

66. Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the verification and proof requested herein by way of

requests, filing this action, Admissions and Request for Production of Documents

served upon Defendants September 15, 2008 and by Subpoenas served upon agencies

who could supply the documentation to prove Obama’s citizenship status. To date,

Plaintiff has not received anything. Plaintiff has received five (5) letters from

agencies that were served with subpoenas claiming they need Obama’s signatures to

comply and/or the confidentiality of the documents were protected from disclosure to

third parties under 5 U.S. C. § 552. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5

U.S.C. § 552(a) allows for the disclosure of documents. If the documents contain

confidential information, the Agency is required to redact the confidential part, e.g.

social security number.

67. Further damages to Plaintiff, if Obama is voted into the Office of the President and

allowed to assume said position, in violation of Article II, Section of our Constitution

as he is not a “natural born” citizen, it would be Unconstitutional. Plaintiff would

suffer further damages as any act or action that Obama executes is Unconstitutional.

This would create massive litigation and a complete disarray of our government and a

Constitutional crisis.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

22

68. Furthermore, the DNC has made specific promises to uphold our Constitution and to

protect the Democratic people; however, they have failed, which constitute damages

under “Promissory Estoppel”.

69. Plaintiff does not have any other means of redress. The issues presented are critical

in order to protect the rights of Plaintiff. Furthermore, there are not any specific

administrative remedies outlined in our laws pertaining to the challenge of a

Presidential candidate who in fact is not a qualified citizen to serve as our President

of the United States pursuant to our United States Constitution.

70. If Obama is allowed to continue his campaign and is elected as our President of the

United States it will be unconstitutional to allow him to serve. Further, if the issues

of Obama’s citizenship status are ignored and he is allowed to assume the position of

President of the United States, anything Obama enters into and/or signs while in

Office will be void, as Obama is not constitutionally eligible to hold the Office of

United States President.

71. Due to the urgency of these issues, Plaintiff is requesting waiver of the Government

Claim requirement.

72. Plaintiff is requesting through this lawsuit an Order for Obama, the DNC, the FEC,

the U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and Administration and the Pennsylvania

Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation to

immediately turn over to Plaintiff the following documents:

(a) A certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth

certificate;

(b) All reissued and sealed birth certificates of Obama;

(c) A certified copy of Obama’s Certification of Citizenship;

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

23

(d) A certified copy of Obama’s Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of

majority; and

(e) Certified copies of Obama’s Admission forms for Occidental College,

Columbia University and Harvard Law School.

COUNT ONE

(Against All Defendants)

Violation of the United States

Constitution, Article II, Section I

73. Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 72 as if fully set forth herein.

74. The United States Constitution, Article II, Section I, Clause 4, Qualifications, Office

of President, states:

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States,

at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to

the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that

Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years,

and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

75. Obama does not and has not been eligible to be constituted a United States “natural

born” citizen and has failed to obtain and/or maintain “naturalized” citizenship status.

76. Obama, if born in Kenya would have made him a citizen of Kenya. Furthermore,

because of the 1940 Naturalization Act, June 1952, Obama’s mother would have had

to be nineteen (19) in order for Obama to be a “natural born” United States citizen.

Obama’s mother was only eighteen (18) when she had Obama and therefore was not

old enough to meet the residency requirements under our laws at the time of Obama’s

birth and be able to register her son’s birth as a “natural born” citizen.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

24

77. Even if Obama would have been able to be registered as a U.S. “natural born” citizen

in Hawaii, which was not legally permissible, he lost his citizenship in the United

States when his mother married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia, and became a

naturalized citizen in Indonesia and set up residency in Indonesia with her new

husband. Minor’s follow their custodial parent’s citizenship status.

78. Moreover, Obama’s Indonesian step father, Lolo Soetoro, signed a Government

acknowledgement form acknowledging Obama as his son and/or legally adopted

Obama, either of which changed Obama’s citizenship status to a “natural” citizen of

Indonesia. Thus, Obama could have only obtained Naturalized citizenship status in

the United States, if in fact he and/or his family filed the proper immigration

paperwork after his return to the United States from Indonesia.

79. Obama’s Indonesian citizenship status is proven on his school record with a public

school in Jakarta Indonesia, which he attended. Obama’s school record clearly states

his name Barry Soetoro, his citizenship, Indonesian, his religion Islam. This

information was verified by the public schools in Jakarta upon registration of the

student with the Indonesian Government. Indonesia did

 

not allow foreign students toattend their schools and Indonesia Immigration Officials and the Police frequently

visited the schools to ensure the students attending were all Indonesian citizens

pursuant to the laws.

80. Students attending the public school system in Jakarta Indonesia at the time Obama

attended had to wear and/or carry with them identification cards, again which were

verified with the Governments records in Indonesia. The student’s identification

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

25

cards displayed their citizenship number, their legal name, their parents names, etc.

The identification cards had to match the student’s school enrollment information.

81. Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges Obama stated his citizenship as

Kenyan on his College Admission forms to Occidental College, Columbia University

and Harvard Law School.

82. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is supposed to represent and protect the

interests of working Americans, which includes securing a Democratic Nominee on

the Presidential Election ballot who represents the Democratic vision and who is

qualified and eligible to run for Office of the President pursuant to the qualifications

of the United States Constitution. The DNC has also promised all democratic

citizens, including Plaintiff that they will in fact uphold the Constitution and require

those in office to do the same. The DNC has failed to inquire into Obama’s

eligibility status.

83. The FEC has the responsibility to ensure the Presidential candidate is in fact eligible

to serve as President of the United States and is responsible for the administration,

enforcement and formulation of policy, exclusive jurisdiction of civil enforcement,

congressional authorities or functions with respect to elections for Federal Office, 2

U.S.C. § 437c (b).

84. The FEC is also responsible for ensuring the compliance with the Federal Election

Campaign Fund Act, which includes eligible candidates, candidates of a political

party for President and/or Vice President of the United States who have met all

applicable conditions for eligibility for the position being sought in order to receive

payments. 26 U.S.C. § 9002, et seq.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

26

85. The U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and Administration and Feinstein also carry

the responsibility to ensure the Presidential candidate is in fact a U.S. “natural born”

citizen and eligible to serve the position they so seek. U.S. Senate, Commission on

Rules and Administration and Feinstein has the responsibility to ensure corrupt

practices are not taking place or corrupt actions of any member of the Senate. The

U.S. Senate Commission on Rules and Administration and Feinstein have the

responsibility of verifying the credentials, qualifications and eligibility status of all

Members of the Senate, contested elections, Federal elections generally, including the

election of the President, Vice President and Members of the Congress, Standing

Rules of the Senate, Rule 25.

86. The DNC, FEC, Feinstein and the U.S. Senate Commission on Rules and

Administration have failed Plaintiff as they have not performed their duties so

delegated to them pursuant to the Laws of our Country and their promises.

Defendants have allowed an ineligible candidate to be nominated as United States

President without performing due diligence in verifying Obama’s eligibility and/or

investigating the fraudulent acts of Obama, for which Plaintiff has been damaged.

Defendants have further allowed the illegal and fraudulent campaigning efforts of

Obama to continue in an attempt to allow an ineligible candidate to serve as United

States President in violation of our United States Constitution.

87. The PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, Secretary of the Commonwealth,

PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation has the

responsibility of placing eligible candidates on the official ballot for the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The Department of State, Bureau of Commissions,

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

27

Elections and Legislation has failed to verify Obama’s citizenship status prior to

placing his name on the ballot in Pennsylvania.

88. The DNC, FEC, Feinstein, U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and Administration

and the PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, PA Secretary of the

Commonwealth, PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections and

Legislation have allowed Obama’s illegal and fraudulent campaign, which Obama

has received in excess of $450 Million in donations, to continue knowing Obama is

not

 

a “natural born” citizen and knowing Obama is not eligible to take and/or servethe position of President of the United States, for which he was receiving donations.

89. Plaintiff has been severely damaged as a result of Defendants actions. Plaintiff has

been deprived liberty, property, due process of law and equal protections of the laws

all guaranteed under the United States Constitution.

90. For the above aforementioned reasons, Defendants need to immediately supply a

certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth certificate; certified

copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates for Obama; a certified copy of

Obama’s Certification of Citizenship; a Certified copy of Obama’s Oath of

Allegiance taken upon the age of Majority; and certified copies of Obama’s

Admission forms for Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard law

School. If Defendants are unable to supply said documents, Obama needs to

immediately step down and withdraw his candidacy for United States President.

WHEREFORE

,  

Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, respectfully prays thatthis Court:

A. Order Defendants to immediately turn over the following documents:

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

28

1. A certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth

certificate;

2. Certified copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates of

Obama in the names referred to in the caption of this lawsuit;

3. A certified copy of Obama’s Certification of Citizenship;

4. A certified copy of Obama’s Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of

majority;

5. Certified copies of Obama’s Admission forms for Occidental

College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School; and

6. Certified copies of any Court Orders or legal documents changing

Obama’s name from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama.

B. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a

Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham

is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” citizen of the United States;

C. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a

Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham

ineligible to run for United States Office of the President under the United States

Constitution, Article II, Section I;

D. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein Obama,

a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry

Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from any further campaigning and from running

for United States Office of the President;

E. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendants, The Democratic National

Committee (DNC), the PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, Secretary of

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

29

the Commonwealth, PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections

and Legislation from placing Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham’s name on the ballot for election of United States President;

F. Order the FEC, Feinstein and the U.S. Senate Commission on Rules and

Administration to immediately open and conduct an investigation into the

fraudulent tactics of Obama and immediately open and conduct an investigation

into the citizenship status of Obama;

G. Waive the Governmental Claim requirement due to the urgency of this

matter;

H. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and

other applicable law; and

I. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just and

proper.

COUNT TWO

(Against All Defendants)

Civil Rights, Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights

In violation of 42 U.S.C. §1983

91. Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 90 as if fully set forth herein.

92. Defendants, acting under the color of law and in concert with one another, engaged in

intentional due process and equal protection of the law violations. In so doing,

Defendants have caused the Plaintiff to suffer deprivation of his fundamental rights to

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

30

due process and equal protection of the laws secured by the United States

Constitution under the Fourteenth Amendment and the Laws of the United States.

93. Plaintiff has been deprived of money and billable hours by fraudulent means as a

result of donating money and billable hours to secure, as promised, an eligible

Democratic candidate for Office of the Presidency, in which to cast his vote. The

DNC named Obama as the Democratic Nominee, who is ineligible to serve as the

United States President as he is not a “natural born” citizen, a qualification and

eligibility requirement pursuant to Article II, Section I of the United States

Constitution. Moreover, Plaintiff has been deprived of his right to vote for an eligible

Democratic Nominee for the U.S. Office of the President.

94. On September 2, 2008, an avid Obama supporter, Fatimah Ali, an Opinion writer for

The Philadelphia Daily News reported Ms. Ali’s opinion, ”

 

If McCain wins, look fora full-fledged race and class war, fueled by a deflated and depressed country,

soaring crime, homelessness – hopelessness!

 

95. Fox News followed this story publishing, ”

 

A fanatical Obama supporter inPhiladelphia is threatening a race war if John McCain wins

 

96. Obama stated to a crowd of his supporters,

 

“I need you to go out and talk to yourfriends and talk to your neighbors. I want you to talk to them whether they are

independent or whether they are Republican. I want you to argue with them and get

in their face…You are my Ambassadors”,

 

as quoted in a newspaper articlepublished in the San Francisco Gate, by Kathleen Hennessey, Associated Press

Writer, on September 17, 2008. Obama is furthering racial tension and promoting

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

31

attacks on non-supporters, which is creating racial tension and violence in our

communities, of which Plaintiff has been victim too.

97. Obama and his campaign have abused their position and the law for intimidation

purposes to stop people from free speech when the speech includes criticism or

questioning of Obama in violation of Plaintiff’s and other American’s civil Rights.

98. Missouri Governor Matt Blunt issued a Press Release stating in pertinent part, ”

 

WhatSenator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words…… abusing

the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats

of prosecution and criminal punishment. This abuse of the law for intimidation insults

the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more

offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive

Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch,

Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill

free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative

organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to

suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on

television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the

election. “Barack Obama needs to grow up……Enlisting Missouri law enforcement

to intimidate people and kill free debate is reminiscent of the Sedition Acts – not a

free society.”

99. As a result of Obama’s message to the People of America, Plaintiff has suffered

damage to his reputation and discrimination and fears for his safety as a result of

attempting to protect his rights and verify the eligibility of Obama to serve as

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

32

President of the United States. Plaintiff has been repeatedly called a racist and

verbally assaulted for bringing forward this lawsuit against Obama. Plaintiff is not a

racist and is a paid Life Member of the NAACP. Plaintiff has received numerous

nasty emails accusing him of being a racist as a result of filing this action against

Obama. Moreover, Plaintiff has been verbally assaulted by black individuals at a

local store he frequents as well as in public for bringing suit against Obama

questioning his citizenship status. All of which is in violation of Plaintiff’s right’s to

due process of the law, equal protection of the laws and the Liberty Clause secured by

the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

100. Defendants are attempting to change our United States Constitution without proper

due process of law by allowing Obama to continue his campaign and continue

seeking election as the President of the United States, knowing he is not a “natural

born” citizen and the fact he may not even be a “naturalized” citizen.

101. It has been announced in the main stream media that Obama’s “briefing” has already

begun into our National Secrets, our Nations Top Secrets, which Obama is not privy

too and in violation of our National Security, as Obama is not a legal citizen of the

United States. This has placed Plaintiff and other citizens of the United States in

grave danger. Plaintiff’s Life, Liberty and Property rights guaranteed by the

Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution will further be violated if Obama is

allowed to be voted into and assume the position of President of the United States;

Plaintiff will be further damaged and is in serious jeopardy.

102. Obama was born in Mombosa, Kenya, and his mother was not old enough to pass on

U.S. “natural born” citizenship status to Obama,

 

United States of America v.Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

33

Cervantes-Nava

 

, 281 F.3d 501 (2002), Drozd v. I.N.S., 155 F.3d 81, 85-88 (2dCir.1998).

103. Additionally, Obama lost any “naturalized” citizenship status when he b e c a m e a

“natural” citizen of Indonesia. Obama’s mother married Lolo Soetoro an Indonesian

Citizen in or about 1964/1965. Lolo Soetoro acknowledged Obama as his son and/or

adopted Obama thus changing his citizenship status to a “natural” citizen of

Indonesia. Under Indonesian law, when a male acknowledges a child as his son, it

deems the son, in this case Obama, as an Indonesian State citizen. Constitution of

Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 62 of 1958 Law No. 12 of 2006 dated 1 Aug. 2006

concerning Citizenship of Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 9 of 1992 dated 31 Mar.

1992 concerning Immigration Affairs and Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab Undangundang

Hukum Perdata) (KUHPer) (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie). Republic

of Indonesia Constitution 1945, a

 

s amended by the First Amendment of 1999, theSecond Amendment of 2000, the Third Amendment of 2001 and the Four th

Amendment of 2002,

 

Chapter X, Citizens and Residents, Article 26 states “(1)Citizens shall consist of indigenous Indonesian peoples and persons of foreign origin

who have been legalized as citizens in accordance with law. (2) Residents shall

consist of Indonesian citizens and foreign nationals living in Indonesia

 

.” Obama wasa “natural” citizen of Indonesia and not a foreign national, as proven by his

Indonesian school registration

104. The DNC, FEC, Feinstein and the U.S. Senate Commission on Rules and

Administration have failed Plaintiff as they have not performed their duties so

delegated to them pursuant to the Laws of our Country and their promises.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

34

Defendants have allowed an ineligible candidate to be nominated as President of the

United States without performing due diligence in verifying Obama’s eligibility

and/or investigating the fraudulent acts of Obama, for which Plaintiff has been

damaged. Defendants have further allowed the illegal and fraudulent campaigning

efforts of Obama to continue in an attempt to allow an ineligible candidate to serve as

President of the United States in violation of our United States Constitution.

105. The PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, Secretary of the Commonwealth,

PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation has the

responsibility of placing eligible candidates on the official ballot for the State of

Pennsylvania. The PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections and

Legislation has failed to verify Obama’s citizenship status prior to placing his name

on the ballot in Pennsylvania.

106. The DNC, FEC, Feinstein, U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and Administration,

the PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, Secretary of the Commonwealth,

PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation have

allowed Obama’s illegal and fraudulent campaign, which Obama has received in

excess of $450 Million in donations, to continue knowing Obama is

 

not a “naturalborn” citizen and knowing Obama is not eligible to take and/or s e r v e t h e

position of President of the United States, for which he was receiving donations.

107. Plaintiff has been severely damaged as a result of Defendants actions. Plaintiff has

been deprived liberty, property, due process of law and equal protections of the laws

all guaranteed under the United States Constitution.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

35

108. For the above aforementioned reasons, Defendants need to immediately supply a

certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth certificate; certified

copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates for Obama; a certified copy of

Obama’s Certification of Citizenship; a Certified copy of Obama’s Oath of

Allegiance taken upon the age of Majority; and certified copies of Obama’s

Admission forms for Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard law

School. If Defendants are unable to supply said documents, Obama needs to

immediately step down and withdraw his candidacy for President of the United

States.

WHEREFORE

,  

Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, respectfully prays thatthis Court:

A. Order Defendants to immediately turn over the following documents:

1. A certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth

certificate;

2. Certified copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates of

Obama in the names referred to in the caption of this lawsuit;

3. A certified copy of Obama’s Certification of Citizenship;

4. A certified copy of Obama’s Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of

majority;

5. Certified copies of Obama’s Admission forms for Occidental

College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School; and

6. Certified copies of any Court Orders or legal documents changing

Obama’s name from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama.

B. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a

Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham

is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” citizen of the United States;

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

36

C. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a

Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham

ineligible to run for United States Office of the President under the United States

Constitution, Article II, Section I;

D. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein Obama,

a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry

Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from any further campaigning and from running

for United States Office of the President;

E. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendants, The Democratic National

Committee (DNC), the PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, PA

Secretary of the Commonwealth, PA Department of State, Bureau

of Commissions, Elections and Legislation from placing Defendant Barack

Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro,

a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham’s name on the ballot for election of

President of the United States;

F. Order the FEC, Feinstein and the U.S. Senate Commission on Rules and

Administration to immediately open and conduct an investigation into the

fraudulent tactics of Obama and immediately open and conduct an investigation

into the citizenship status of Obama;

G. Waive the Governmental Claim requirement due to the urgency of this

matter;

H. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and

other applicable law; and

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

37

I. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just and

proper.

COUNT THREE

(Against All Defendants)

Civil Rights, Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil rights

In violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985

109. Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 108 as if fully set forth herein.

110. Defendants, acting under the color of law and in concert with one another, engaged in

intentional due process and equal protection of the law violations. In so doing,

Defendants have caused the Plaintiff to suffer deprivation of his fundamental rights to

due process and equal protection of the laws secured by the United States

Constitution under the Fourteenth Amendment and the Laws of the United States.

111. Defendants and each of them conspired with each other to deprive Plaintiff of his

right to due process, right to equal protection of the laws, and protection of the laws

of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as well as Plaintiff’s Constitutional Rights

secured by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

112. Obama knowing he is not a “natural born” United States Citizen and knowing he is a

citizen of Indonesia fraudulently sought and accomplished having his name placed on

the ballot for the Democratic Nominee for President of the United States, which he

accomplished.

113. Obama encouraged his supporters to act as his Ambassadors; to knock on doors, get

mad and get in peoples faces in efforts to seek their votes for Obama, which has

created violence and racial tension. Unfortunately, Obama’s supporters have

complied with Obama’s request.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

38

114. Obama has further fraudulently campaigned to be elected as President of the United

States and has obtained in excess of $450 Million dollars in donations based on his

fraudulent campaigning, again, knowing he is not eligible to serve as President of the

United States as he is not a “natural born” U.S. citizen, as required by the United

States Constitution, Article II, Section I.Obama is well aware he is in fact a citizen of

Indonesia.

115. Obama and his campaign have abused their position and the law for intimidation

purposes to stop people from free speech when the speech includes criticism or

questioning of Obama in violation of Plaintiff’s and other American’s civil Rights.

116. The DNC, FEC, Feinstein and the U.S. Senate Commission on Rules and

Administration have failed Plaintiff as they have not performed their duties so

delegated to them pursuant to the Laws of our Country and their promises.

Defendants have allowed an ineligible candidate to be nominated as President of the

United States without performing due diligence in verifying Obama’s eligibility

and/or investigating the fraudulent acts of Obama, for which Plaintiff has been

damaged. Defendants have further allowed the illegal and fraudulent campaigning

efforts of Obama to continue in an attempt to allow an ineligible candidate to serve as

President of the United States in violation of our United States Constitution.

117. The PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, Secretary of the Commonwealth,

PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation has the

responsibility of placing eligible candidates on the official ballot for the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The PA Department of State, Bureau of

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

39

Commissions, Elections and Legislation has failed to verify Obama’s citizenship

status prior to placing his name on the ballot in Pennsylvania.

118. The DNC, FEC, Feinstein, U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and Administration,

the PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, Secretary of the Commonwealth,

PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation have

allowed Obama’s illegal and fraudulent campaign, which Obama has received in

excess of $450 Million in donations, to continue knowing Obama is

 

not a “naturalborn” citizen and knowing Obama is not eligible to take and/or serve the position of

President of the United States, for which he was receiving donations.

119. As a result, Plaintiff has been deprived of money and billable hours by fraudulent

means as a result of donating money and billable hours to secure, as promised, an

eligible Democratic candidate for Office of the Presidency, in which to cast his vote.

The DNC named Obama as the Democratic Nominee, who is ineligible to serve as

the President of the United States as he is not a “natural born” citizen, a qualification

and eligibility requirement pursuant to Article II, Section I of the United States

Constitution. Moreover, Plaintiff has been deprived of his right to vote for an eligible

Democratic Nominee for the U.S. Office of the Presidency.

120. Plaintiff has been severely damaged as a result of Defendants actions. Plaintiff has

been deprived liberty, property, due process of law and equal protections of the laws

all guaranteed under the United States Constitution.

121. As a result of Obama’s message to the People of America, Plaintiff has suffered

damage to his reputation and discrimination and fears for his safety as a result of

attempting to protect his rights and verify the eligibility of Obama to serve as

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

40

President of the United States. Plaintiff has been repeatedly called a racist and

verbally assaulted for bringing forward this lawsuit against Obama. Plaintiff is not a

racist and is a paid Life Member of the NAACP. Plaintiff has received numerous

nasty emails accusing him of being a racist as a result of filing this action against

Obama. Moreover, Plaintiff was verbally assaulted by a black female in public for

bringing suit against Obama questioning his citizenship status. All of which is in

violation of Plaintiff’s right’s to due process of the law, equal protection of the laws

and the Liberty Clause secured by the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S.

Constitution

122. For the above aforementioned reasons, Defendants need to immediately supply a

certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth certificate; certified

copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates for Obama; a certified copy of

Obama’s Certification of Citizenship; a Certified copy of Obama’s Oath of

Allegiance taken upon the age of Majority; and certified copies of Obama’s

Admission forms for Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard law

School. If Defendants are unable to supply said documents, Obama needs to

immediately step down and withdraw his candidacy for President of the United

States.

WHEREFORE

,  

Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, respectfully prays thatthis Court:

A. Order Defendants to immediately turn over the following documents:

1. A certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth

certificate;

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

41

2. Certified copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates of

Obama in the names referred to in the caption of this lawsuit;

3. A certified copy of Obama’s Certification of Citizenship;

4. A certified copy of Obama’s Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of

majority;

5. Certified copies of Obama’s Admission forms for Occidental

College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School; and

6. Certified copies of any Court Orders or legal documents changing

Obama’s name from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama.

B. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a

Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham

is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” citizen of the United States;

C. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a

Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham

ineligible to run for United States Office of the President under the United States

Constitution, Article II, Section I;

D. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein Obama,

a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry

Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from any further campaigning and from running

for United States Office of the President;

E. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendants, The Democratic National

Committee (DNC), the PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, Secretary

of the Commonwealth, PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions,

Elections and Legislation from placing Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a

Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham,

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

42

a/k/a Barack Dunham’s name on the ballot for election of P r e s i d e n t o f t h e

United States;

F. Order the FEC, Feinstein and the U.S. Senate Commission on Rules and

Administration to immediately open and conduct an investigation into the

fraudulent tactics of Obama and immediately open and conduct an investigation

into the citizenship status of Obama;

G. Waive the Governmental Claim requirement due to the urgency of this

matter;

H. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and

other applicable law; and

I. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just and

proper.

COUNT FOUR

(Against All Defendants)

Civil Rights, Action for Neglect to Prevent

In violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1986

123. Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 122 as if fully set forth herein.

124. Defendants, acting under the color of law and in concert with one another, engaged in

intentional due process and equal protection of the law violations. In so doing,

Defendants have caused the Plaintiff to suffer deprivation of his fundamental rights to

due process and equal protection of the laws secured by the United States

Constitution under the Fourteenth Amendment and the Laws of the United States.

125. The DNC, FEC, Feinstein and the U.S. Senate Commission on Rules and

Administration were and are well aware of Obama’s illegal activities, encouraging

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

43

racial tension, encouraging violence, his fraudulent campaigning, fraudulently

attempting to secure the position of President of the United States. Defendants have

failed Plaintiff as they have not performed their duties so delegated to them pursuant

to the Laws of our Country and their promises. Defendants have allowed an

ineligible candidate to be nominated as President of the United States without

performing due diligence in verifying Obama’s eligibility and/or investigating the

fraudulent acts of Obama, for which Plaintiff has been damaged. Defendants have

further allowed the illegal and fraudulent campaigning efforts of Obama to continue

in an attempt to allow an ineligible candidate to serve as President of the United

States in violation of our United States Constitution.

126. The PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, Secretary of the Commonwealth,

PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation has the

responsibility of placing eligible candidates on the official ballot for the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The PA Department of State, Bureau of

Commissions, Elections and Legislation has failed to verify Obama’s citizenship

status prior to placing his name on the ballot in Pennsylvania.

127. The DNC, FEC, Feinstein, U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and Administration,

the PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, Secretary of the Commonwealth,

PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation have

allowed Obama’s illegal and fraudulent campaign, which Obama has received in

excess of $450 Million in donations, to continue knowing Obama is

 

not a “naturalborn” citizen and knowing Obama is not eligible to take and/or serve the position of

President of the United States, for which he was receiving donations.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

44

128. As a result, Plaintiff has been deprived of money and billable hours by fraudulent

means as a result of donating money and billable hours to secure, as promised, an

eligible Democratic candidate for Office of the Presidency, in which to cast his vote.

The DNC named Obama as the Democratic Nominee, who is ineligible to serve as

the President of the United States as he is not a “natural born” citizen, a qualification

and eligibility requirement pursuant to Article II, Section I of the United States

Constitution. Moreover, Plaintiff has been deprived of his right to vote for an eligible

Democratic Nominee for the U.S. Office of the Presidency.

129. Plaintiff has been severely damaged as a result of Defendants actions. Plaintiff has

been deprived of liberty, property, due process of law and equal protections of the

laws all guaranteed under the United States Constitution.

130. As a result of Obama’s message to the People of America, Plaintiff has suffered

damage to his reputation and discrimination and fears for his safety as a result of

attempting to protect his rights and verify the eligibility of Obama to serve as

President of the United States. Plaintiff has been repeatedly called a racist and

verbally assaulted for bringing forward this lawsuit against Obama. Plaintiff is not a

racist and is a paid Life Member of the NAACP. Plaintiff has received numerous

nasty emails accusing him of being a racist as a result of filing this action against

Obama. Moreover, Plaintiff was verbally assaulted by a black female in public for

bringing suit against Obama questioning his citizenship status. All of which is in

violation of Plaintiff’s right’s to due process of the law, equal protection of the laws

and the Liberty Clause secured by the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S.

Constitution.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

45

131. For the above aforementioned reasons, Defendants need to immediately supply a

certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth certificate; certified

copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates for Obama; a certified copy of

Obama’s Certification of Citizenship; a Certified copy of Obama’s Oath of

Allegiance taken upon the age of Majority; and certified copies of Obama’s

Admission forms for Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard law

School. If Defendants are unable to supply said documents, Obama needs to

immediately step down and withdraw his candidacy for President of the United

States.

WHEREFORE

,  

Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, respectfully prays thatthis Court:

A. Order Defendants to immediately turn over the following documents:

1. A certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth

certificate;

2. Certified copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates of

Obama in the names referred to in the caption of this lawsuit;

3. A certified copy of Obama’s Certification of Citizenship;

4. A certified copy of Obama’s Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of

majority;

5. Certified copies of Obama’s Admission forms for Occidental

College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School; and

6. Certified copies of any Court Orders or legal documents changing

Obama’s name from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama.

B. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a

Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham

is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” citizen of the United States;

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

46

C. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a

Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham

ineligible to run for United States Office of the President under the United States

Constitution, Article II, Section I;

D. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein Obama,

a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry

Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from any further campaigning and from running

for United States Office of the President;

E. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendants, The Democratic National

Committee (DNC), the PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, Secretary of

the Commonwealth, PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections

and Legislation from placing Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham’s name on the ballot for election of President of the United

States;

F. Order the FEC, Feinstein and the U.S. Senate Commission on Rules and

Administration to immediately open and conduct an investigation into the

fraudulent tactics of Obama and immediately open and conduct an investigation

into the citizenship status of Obama;

G. Waive the Governmental Claim requirement due to the urgency of this

matter;

H. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and

other applicable law; and

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

47

I. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just and

proper.

COUNT FIVE

(Against all Defendants)

Campaign Fraud,

In violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act

2 U.S.C. § 437, et seq. and 26 U.S.C. § 9002, et seq.

132. Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 131 as if fully set forth herein.

133. Obama committed Fraud upon Plaintiff and the American Citizens by running for

President claiming to be eligible, knowing he was not eligible, knowing he was born

in Mombasa, Kenya and his mother not being old enough to pass U.S. “natural born”

citizenship status to him. Obama is well aware his citizenship status changed from a

U.S. Naturalized citizen, if he ever held such, to a “natural” citizen of Indonesia when

his step father, Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen, legally acknowledged Obama as

his son and/or adopted Obama.

134. Obama further committed Fraud upon Plaintiff and the American people by falsifying

information on his Illinois State Bar Registration and Public Disciplinary Record.

Obama stated on his Application to the State Bar of Illinois, as proven by the Illinois

State Bar Registration and Disciplinary Record, stating he never used any other

names. Obama signed his application/registration for the Illinois State Bar under the

penalty of perjury knowing the information to be false. The fact of the matter is

Obama used the name Barry Soetoro in Indonesia and was registered as a citizen of

Indonesia on his school records. Obama further used the name Barry Obama and it is

further believed Obama used the name Barack and/or Barry Dunham.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

48

135. Obama attempted to defraud Plaintiff and the American people by allowing an altered

and forged Hawaii Certification of Live Birth (COLB) to be placed on his campaign

website. Obama was well aware the Government issued COLB was altered and

forged as the original document was in the name of

 

Maya Kasandra Soetoro born in1970. Maya Kassandra Soetoro’s Obama’s half sister who was born in Indonesia and

her birth was later registered in Hawaii. The altered and forged COLB is still on

O b a m a ’ s c a m p a i g n w e b s i t e l o c a t e d a t

http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/birthcert

136. Furthermore, Obama traveled to Indonesia, Pakistan and Southern India in 1981. The

relations between Pakistan and India were extremely tense and Pakistan was in

turmoil and under martial law. The country was filled with Afghan refugees; and

Pakistan’s Islamist-leaning Interservices Intelligence Agency (ISI) had begun to

provide arms to the Afghan mujahideen and to assist the process of recruiting

radicalized Muslim men–jihadists–from around the world to fight against the Soviet

Union. Pakistan was so dangerous that it was on the State Department’s travel ban

list for US Citizens. Non-Muslim visitors were not welcome unless sponsored by

their embassy for official business. A Muslim citizen of Indonesia traveling on an

Indonesian passport would have success entering Indonesia, Pakistan and India.

Therefore, it is believed Obama traveled on his Indonesian passport entering the

Countries. Indonesian passports require renewal every five (5) years. At the time of

Obama’s travels to Indonesia, Pakistan and India, Obama was twenty (20) years old.

If Obama would have been a U.S. citizen, which he was not, 8 USC §1481(a)(2)

provides loss of nationality by native born citizens upon “taking an oath or making an

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

49

affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state…after having

attained the age of eighteen years”, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1401(a)(1). More

importantly, in order to obtain an Indonesian Passport, you had to be an Indonesian

citizen. Since Lolo Soetoro legally acknowledged Obama as his son and/or adopted

Obama, Obama was a “natural” citizen of Indonesia, as proven by Obama’s school

record.

137. Moreover, as stated above, Obama was registered in School in Jakarta, Indonesia as

Barry Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia, born in 1961 in Hawaii and his religion was

registered as Islam.

138. Obama fraudulently began campaigning to secure the United States Office of the

Presidency and fraudulently accepted in excess of $450 Million dollars knowing he

could never serve as President of the United States.

139. The DNC, FEC, Feinstein and the U.S. Senate Commission on Rules and

Administration were and are well aware of Obama’s illegal activities, encouraging

racial tension, encouraging violence, his fraudulent campaigning, fraudulently

attempting to secure the position of President of the United States. Defendants have

failed Plaintiff as they have not performed their duties so delegated to them pursuant

to the Laws of our Country and their promises. Defendants have allowed an

ineligible candidate to be nominated as President of the United States without

performing due diligence in verifying Obama’s eligibility and/or investigating the

fraudulent acts of Obama, for which Plaintiff has been damaged. Defendants have

further allowed the illegal and fraudulent campaigning efforts of Obama to continue

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

50

in an attempt to allow an ineligible candidate to serve as President of the United

States in violation of our United States Constitution.

140. The PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, Secretary of the Commonwealth,

PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation has the

responsibility of placing eligible candidates on the official ballot for the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The PA Department of State, Bureau of

Commissions, Elections and Legislation has failed to verify Obama’s citizenship

status prior to placing his name on the ballot in Pennsylvania.

141. The DNC, FEC, Feinstein, U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and Administration,

the PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, Secretary of the Commonwealth,

PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation have

allowed Obama’s illegal and fraudulent campaign, which Obama has received in

excess of $450 Million in donations, to continue knowing Obama is

 

not a “naturalborn” citizen and knowing Obama is not eligible to take and/or serve the position of

President of the United States, for which he was receiving donations.

142. As a result, Plaintiff has been deprived of money and billable hours by fraudulent

means as a result of donating money and billable hours to secure, as promised, an

eligible Democratic candidate for Office of the Presidency, in which to cast his vote.

The DNC named Obama as the Democratic Nominee, who is ineligible to serve as

President of the United States as he is not a “natural born” citizen, a qualification and

eligibility requirement pursuant to Article II, Section I of the United States

Constitution. Moreover, Plaintiff has been deprived of his right to vote for an eligible

Democratic Nominee for the U.S. Office of the Presidency.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

51

143. Plaintiff has been severely damaged as a result of Defendants actions. Plaintiff has

been deprived of liberty, property, due process of law and equal protections of the

laws all guaranteed under the United States Constitution.

144. For the above aforementioned reasons, Defendants need to immediately supply a

certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth certificate; certified

copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates for Obama; a certified copy of

Obama’s Certification of Citizenship; a Certified copy of Obama’s Oath of

Allegiance taken upon the age of Majority; and certified copies of Obama’s

Admission forms for Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard law

School. If Defendants are unable to supply said documents, Obama needs to

immediately step down and withdraw his candidacy for President of the United

States.

WHEREFORE

,  

Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, respectfully prays thatthis Court:

A. Order Defendants to immediately turn over the following documents:

1. A certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth

certificate;

2. Certified copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates of

Obama in the names referred to in the caption of this lawsuit;

3. A certified copy of Obama’s Certification of Citizenship;

4. A certified copy of Obama’s Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of

majority;

5. Certified copies of Obama’s Admission forms for Occidental

College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School; and

6. Certified copies of any Court Orders or legal documents changing

Obama’s name from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

52

B. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a

]Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham

is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” citizen of the United States;

C. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a

Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham

ineligible to run for United States Office of the President under the United States

Constitution, Article II, Section I;

D. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein Obama,

a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry

Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from any further campaigning and from running

for United States Office of the President;

E. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendants, The Democratic National

Committee (DNC), the PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, Secretary

of the Commonwealth, PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions,

Elections and Legislation from placing Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a

Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham,

a/k/a Barack Dunham’s name on the ballot for election of P r e s i d e n t o f t h e

United States;

F. Order the FEC, Feinstein and the U.S. Senate Commission on Rules and

Administration to immediately open and conduct an investigation into the

fraudulent tactics of Obama and immediately open and conduct an investigation

into the citizenship status of Obama;

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

53

G. Waive the Governmental Claim requirement due to the urgency of this

matter;

H. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and

other applicable law; and

I. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just and

proper.

COUNT SIX

(Against all Defendants)

Violation of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)

5 U.S.C. § 552, et seq.

145. Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 144 as if fully set forth herein.

146. Plaintiff attempted to secure documents proving the citizenship status of Obama from

Obama the FEC, DNC, Feinstein, U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and

Administration, however has been refused.

147. In attempt to resolve the issues regarding Obama’s citizenship status, Plaintiff served

subpoenas on the U.S. Embassy, Jakarta Indonesia, U.S. Embassy, Nairobi, Kenya,

the U.S. State Department, the Federal Bureau of Information (FBI), the Central

Intelligence Agency (CIA), The Hawaii Department of Health, Kapi’olani Medical

Center for Women and Children, Queens Medical Center, and the U.S. Senate,

Commission on Rules and Administration. Unfortunately, to date, Plaintiff has been

refused all documents.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

54

148. Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack there of and has requested investigation into the eligibility

status of Obama. Defendants have completely ignored the complaints and requests.

149. Plaintiff has a right, which is secured to him by our laws and the United States

Constitution, for verification of our Presidential Nominee’s eligibility to serve as

President of the United States prior to the elections.

150. Plaintiff has suffered an informational injury as a voter and member of the public; the

lack of information on Mr. Obama’s citizenship, caused by the FEC, Feinstein, the

U.S. Senate, Commission on Rules and Administration’s actions, Obama, Cortés, PA

Secretary of the Commonwealth, PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions,

Elections and Legislation limited the information available to Plaintiff as a voter and

impaired his ability to make proper decisions and ensure he is voting for a legally

eligible Presidential candidate.

151. If a party is denied information that will help it in making a voting decision that party

is obviously injured in fact.

 

FEC v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998).152. For the above aforementioned reasons, Defendants need to immediately supply a

certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth certificate; certified

copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates for Obama; a certified copy of

Obama’s Certification of Citizenship; a Certified copy of Obama’s Oath of

Allegiance taken upon the age of Majority; and certified copies of Obama’s

Admission forms for Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard law

School. If Defendants are unable to supply said documents, Obama needs to

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

55

immediately step down and withdraw his candidacy for President of the United

States.

WHEREFORE

,  

Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, respectfully prays thatthis Court:

A. Order Defendants to immediately turn over the following documents:

1. A certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth

certificate;

2. Certified copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates of

Obama in the names referred to in the caption of this lawsuit;

3. A certified copy of Obama’s Certification of Citizenship;

4. A certified copy of Obama’s Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of

majority;

5. Certified copies of Obama’s Admission forms for Occidental

College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School; and

6. Certified copies of any Court Orders or legal documents changing

Obama’s name from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama.

B. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a

Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham

is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” citizen of the United States;

C. Declare that Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a

Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham

ineligible to run for United States Office of the President under the United States

Constitution, Article II, Section I;

D. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein Obama,

a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

56

Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from any further campaigning and from running

for United States Office of the President;

E. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendants, The Democratic National

Committee (DNC), the PA Department of State and Pedro A. Cortés, Secretary of

the Commonwealth, PA Department of State, Bureau of Commissions, Elections

and Legislation from placing Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham’s name on the ballot for election of President of the United

States;

F. Order the FEC, Feinstein and the U.S. Senate Commission on Rules and

Administration to immediately open and conduct an investigation into the

fraudulent tactics of Obama and immediately open and conduct an investigation

into the citizenship status of Obama;

G. Waive the Governmental Claim requirement due to the urgency of this

matter;

H. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and

other applicable law; and

I. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just and

proper.

COUNT SEVEN

(Against Defendants Obama and the DNC)

Promissory Estoppel

153. Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 152 as if fully set forth herein.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

57

154. Plaintiff is a life long Democrat who had always been proud of his Party. Plaintiff is

a licensed attorney in good standing and has taken an oath to uphold the United States

Constitution. Plaintiff has donated money and billable hours to Democratic

Presidential candidates as well as to the Democratic National Committee. Plaintiff

has relied on the DNC’s promises to uphold our Constitution, which includes

properly vetting our Presidential Nominee and ensuring our Party’s Nominee is

eligible to serve as President of the United States pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of

our United States Constitution.

155. In addition, Plaintiff has trusted the Federal Election Committee (“FEC”) that they

would ensure our Presidential and Congress candidates were eligible for the positions

which they were seeking and running a fair and legitimate campaign process.

Plaintiff has relied on the FEC, DNC and all our Elected Office Holders to uphold our

Constitution and to ensure an illegal alien and/or a naturalized citizen would not be

able to secure the position of President of the United States.

156. In order to be eligible and qualified to run for the Office of the President of the

United States you must be a “natural born” citizen. United States Constitution,

Article II, Section I.

157. The DNC published on their website at

 

http://www.democrats.org their 2008Democratic National Platform ”

 

Renewing America’s Promise“. The DNC’s platformof promise contain many promises to the American people.

158. The DNC promises on page iii Section IV, Renewing American Democracy further

promising

 

Open, Accountable and Ethical government; Reclaiming ourZ:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

58

Constitution and our Liberties; and Voting Rights

.”  

The DNC has failed to upholdand follow through with their promises.

159. The DNC promises in their promotion of Obama, Page 53,

 

“In Barack Obama’sAdministration, we will open up the doors of democracy.

 

We will use technology tomake government more transparent, accountable, and inclusive.

 

Rather than obstructpeople’s use of the Freedom of Information Act, we will require that agencies

conduct significant business in public and release all relevant information unless an

agency reasonably foresees harm to a protected interest.”

160. The DNC has pledged and promised Plaintiff and all Democratic individuals they

believe that our Constitution, our courts, our institutions and our traditions are proper

and work.

161. The DNC pledged and promised Plaintiff and all Democratic individuals they will

ensure our Constitution is not a nuisance and have assured Plaintiff and democratic

individuals the United States Constitution is the foundation of our democracy. It

makes freedom and self-governance possible, and helps to protect our security. The

Democratic Party has pledged and promised Plaintiff and other Democratic

individuals they will maintain and restore our Constitution to its proper place in our

government and return our Nation to the best traditions, including their commitment

to government by law.

162. Unfortunately, the DNC has not upheld our Constitution and/or our Laws. The DNC

is promoting an illegal candidate who is ineligible to serve as the President of the

United States. The DNC has failed to investigate into Obama’s citizenship. Obama

is not a “natural born” U.S. citizen, he is still an Indonesian citizen and ineligible to

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

59

serve as President of the United States, United States Constitution, Article II, Section

I.

163. The DNC has promised on page 56 ”

 

Voting rights are fundamental rights becausethey are protective of all other rights. We will work to fully protect and enforce the

fundamental Constitutional right of every American vote—to ensure that the

Constitution’s promise is fully realized

 

.” “Finally, we will enact legislation thatestablishes harsh penalties for those who engage in voter intimidation and creates a

process for providing accurate information to misinformed voters so they can cast

their votes in time.”

164. The DNC has promised on page 56 ”

 

Voting rights are fundamental rights becausethey are protective of all other rights. We will work to fully protect and enforce the

fundamental Constitutional right of every American vote—to ensure that the

Constitution’s promise is fully realized

 

.” “Finally, we will enact legislation thatestablishes harsh penalties for those who engage in voter intimidation and creates a

process for providing accurate information to misinformed voters so they can cast

their votes in time.”

165. The DNC has not protected Plaintiff or other Democratic voter’s rights, they have

failed to provide accurate information, they have not investigated Obama’s eligibility

and/or citizenship status and they have allowed Obama’s tactics in promoting racial

tension and threatening to have people arrested and prosecuted if they talk negatively

or debate against Obama.

166. Based on the DNC’s promises and assurances, Plaintiff and other democratic

individuals have donated money in good faith to the DNC and other Democratic

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

60

Presidential Nominees. Money donated to the DNC is used to

 

plan the Party’squadrennial presidential nominating convention; promote the election of eligible

Party candidates, pursuant to the United States Constitution, Article II, Section I, with

both technical and financial support; and works with national, state and local party

organizations, elected officials, candidates and constituencies to respond to the needs

and views of the Democratic electorate and the nation.

167. Obama has promised to uphold the United States Constitution and to be open and

honest with all questions presented. However, Obama has not been open and honest;

he has refused to provide proof of his citizenship status and has refused to answer

questions pertaining to his citizenship status. Furthermore, Obama is not upholding

the Constitution as he is aware he is ineligible to serve as the Pressident of the United

States. Obama has further violated the U.S. Constitution by fraudulently collecting in

excess of $450 Million dollars.

168. Obama promises on his website to

 

End Deceptive Voting Practices. “Obama stateshe will sign into law his legislation that establishes harsh penalties for those who

have engaged in voter fraud and provide voters who have been misinformed with

accurate and full information so they can vote.”

 

Obama has made the promiseshowever, has been dishonest regarding his citizenship status

 

and has refused to provehis citizenship status so Plaintiff and other voter’s can be well educated into our

Presidential candidate.

169. Obama states on his webpage at

 

http://factcheck.barackobama.com I want tocampaign the same way I govern, which is to respond directly and forcefully w i t h

the truth

 

” ~ Barack Obama, 11/08/07. Unfortunately, this is not true, Obama has not

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

61

been honest about his citizenship and he has refused to provide proof of his

citizenship status. Instead, Obama and his campaign placed an image on Obama’s

website purporting to be an original Certification of Live Birth (COLB) of Obama’s

from Hawaii. It was later determined the COLB on http://www.fightthesmears.com turned

out to be an altered and forged COLB.

170. The DNC and FEC bear the responsibility of vetting the Democratic Presidential

candidate, among other things, to ensure the eligibility requirements pursuant to our

Constitution are met and the Presidential nominee, if elected, is qualified and eligible

to serve pursuant to our United States Constitution. The DNC has promised the

people to uphold this obligation which is part of upholding the United States

Constitution.

171. To date, the DNC has never verified the eligibility of Obama, despite knowing

Obama was not an eligible candidate, as promised, and instead nominated Obama as

the Democratic Presidential Nominee. The DNC is well aware Obama cannot hold

the United States Office of the Presidency and therefore failed to follow through on

their promises.

172. Additionally, the DNC has not upheld the U.S. Constitution, their protections of

Plaintiff and/or the Democratic citizens of the United States, nor have they done the

job they have promised Plaintiff and other Democratic citizens.

173. As a result, there is significant disenfranchisement of the Democratic Party, which

has harmed Plaintiff. The disenfranchisement is a result of the DNC allowing a noncitizen;

in fact a citizen of Indonesia, to be the Democratic Nominee, knowing

Obama cannot serve as the President of the United States, if elected. The DNC has

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

62

allowed Obama’s fraudulent campaigning to continue and Plaintiff has been

deprived money which he donated to support an eligible Democratic Nominee to run,

and if elected, to serve as the President of the United States.

174. Plaintiff has been deprived of money and billable hours by fraudulent means as a

result of donating money and billable hours to secure, as promised, an eligible

Democratic candidate for Office of the Presidency, in which to cast his vote. The

DNC named Obama as the Democratic Nominee, who is ineligible to serve as the

President of the United States as he is not a “natural born” citizen, a qualification and

eligibility requirement pursuant to Article II, Section I of the United States

Constitution. Moreover, Plaintiff has been deprived of his right to vote for an eligible

Democratic Nominee for the U.S. Office of the Presidency.

175. Plaintiff has been severely damaged as a result of Defendants actions. Plaintiff has

been deprived of liberty, property, due process of law and equal protections of the

laws all guaranteed under the United States Constitution.

176. As a result of Obama’s message to the People of America, Plaintiff has suffered

damage to his reputation and discrimination and fears for his safety as a result of

attempting to protect his rights and verify the eligibility of Obama to serve as

President of the United States. Plaintiff has been repeatedly called a racist and

verbally assaulted for bringing forward this lawsuit against Obama. Plaintiff is not a

racist and is a paid Life Member of the NAACP. Plaintiff has received numerous

nasty emails accusing him of being a racist as a result of filing this action against

Obama. Moreover, Plaintiff was verbally assaulted by a black female in public for

bringing suit against Obama questioning his citizenship status. All of which is in

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

63

violation of Plaintiff’s right’s to due process of the law, equal protection of the laws

and the Liberty Clause secured by the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S.

Constitution.

177. All elements required to invoke Promissory Estoppel have been met by Plaintiff. The

DNC and Obama made a promise to Plaintiff, which Plaintiff relied upon and

expected. Not only has Plaintiff suffered economic losses; he has lost his

constitutional right to vote for an eligible Democratic candidate who can serve as the

President of the United States, if elected.

178. The only way justice can be served is by the Court enforcing the promise of the DNC

and Obama.

179. For the above aforementioned reasons, Defendants need to immediately uphold their

promises, uphold the United States Constitution and immediately supply a certified

copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth certificate; certified copies of

all reissued and sealed birth certificates for Obama; a certified copy of Obama’s

Certification of Citizenship; a Certified copy of Obama’s Oath of Allegiance taken

upon the age of Majority; and certified copies of Obama’s Admission forms for

Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard law School. If Defendants are

unable to supply said documents, Obama needs to immediately step down and

withdraw his candidacy for President of the United States.

WHEREFORE

,  

Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, respectfully prays thatthis Court:

A. Order Defendants to immediately turn over the following documents:

1. A certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth

certificate;

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

64

2. Certified copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates of

Obama in the names referred to in the caption of this lawsuit;

3. A certified copy of Obama’s Certification of Citizenship;

4. A certified copy of Obama’s Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of

majority;

5. Certified copies of Obama’s Admission forms for Occidental

College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School; and

6. Certified copies of any Court Orders or legal documents changing

Obama’s name from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama.

B. Order Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry

Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham

removed from the Presidential Ballot until his citizenship status can in fact be

verified ensuring he is eligible to serve as the President of the United States;

C. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein Obama,

a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry

Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from any further campaigning and from running

for United States Office of the President until he is able to prove his citizenship

status and eligibility to hold the United States Office of the Presidency;

D. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendants, The Democratic National

Committee (DNC), from placing Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry

`Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a

Barack Dunham’s name on the ballot for election of the President of the United

States until Obama’s citizenship status and eligibility to serve as the United States

Presidency have been verified;

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

65

E. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and

other applicable law; and

F. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just and

proper.

COUNT EIGHT

(Against Defendant Obama)

Loss of nationality by native-born or naturalized citizen

8 U.S.C. § 1481(b)

180. Plaintiff hereby incorporates Paragraphs 1 through 179 as if fully set forth herein.

181. Obama was born in Mombosa, Kenya in or about August 4, 1961. At the time of his

birth, Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya and his mother was a U.S. citizen,

eighteen (18) years of age. The Nationality Act of 1940, revised June 1952 required

the citizen parent of a child born abroad must reside in the United States for ten (10)

years, five (5) of which were after the age of fourteen (14) in order to register the

child born abroad as a United States “natural born” citizen. Obama’s mother was not

old enough to pass on U.S. “natural born” citizenship to Obama and therefore could

only register his birth as “naturalized”.

182. Even if Obama would have been able to be registered as a U.S. “natural born” citizen

in Hawaii, which was not available, he lost his citizenship in the United States when

his mother married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia, and became a naturalized

citizen in Indonesia and set up residency in Indonesia with her new husband.

Minor’s follow their custodial parent’s citizenship status.

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

66

183. Moreover, Obama’s Indonesian step father, Lolo Soetoro, signed a Government

acknowledgement form acknowledging Obama as his son and/or legally adopted

Obama, either of which changed Obama’s citizenship status to a “natural” citizen of

Indonesia. Thus, Obama could have only obtained Naturalized citizenship status in

the United States, if in fact he and/or his family filed the proper immigration

paperwork.

184. Under Indonesian law, when a male acknowledges a child as his son, it deems the

son, in this case Obama, as an Indonesian State citizen. Constitution of Republic of

Indonesia, Law No. 62 of 1958 Law No. 12 of 2006 dated 1 Aug. 2006 concerning

Citizenship of Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 9 of 1992 dated 31 Mar. 1992

concerning Immigration Affairs and Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab Undang-undang

Hukum Perdata) (KUHPer) (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie) states in pertinent

part,

 

State citizens of Indonesia include: (viii) children who are born outside of legalmarriage from foreign State citizen mother who are acknowledged by father who is

Indonesian State citizen as his children and that acknowledgment is made prior to

children reaching 18 years of age or prior to marriage;

 

Republic of IndonesiaConstitution 1945,

 

As amended by the First Amendment of 1999, the SecondAmendment of 2000, the Third Amendment of 2001 and the Fourth Amendment of

2002,

 

Chapter X, Citizens and Residents, Article 26 states, “(1) Citizens shall consistof indigenous Indonesian peoples and persons of foreign origin who have been

legalized [sic] as citizens in accordance with law. (2) Residents shall consist of

Indonesian citizens and foreign nationals living in Indonesia

 

.”

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

67

185. Furthermore, under the Indonesian adoption law, once adopted by an Indonesian

citizen, the adoption severs the child’s relationship to the birth parents,

 

and theadopted child is given the same status as a natural child, Indonesian Constitution,

Article 2.

186. The Indonesian citizenship law was designed to prevent apatride (stateless) or

bipatride (dual citizenship). Indonesian regulations recognize neither apatride nor

bipatride citizenship. Obama’s mother was required to renounce her U.S. citizenship

and was sponsored by her Indonesian spouse. Minor children followed their

custodial parent’s citizenship status.

187. Obama was enrolled by his parents in a public school, Fransiskus Assisi School, a

public school, in Jakarta, Indonesia. Plaintiff has received copies of the school

registration in which it clearly states Obama’s name as “Barry Soetoro,” and lists his

citizenship as Indonesian, his citizenship number as 203. Obama’s father is listed as

Lolo Soetoro, Obama’s date of birth and place of birth are listed as August 4, 1961 in

Hawaii, and Obama’s Religion is listed as Islam. This document was verified by

television show

 

Inside Edition, whose reporter, Matt Meagher, took the actual footageof the school record. At the time Obama was registered, the public schools obtained

and verified the citizenship status and name of the student through the Indonesian

Government. All Indonesian students were required to carry government identity

cards, or

 

Karty Tanda Pendudaks, as well as family card identification called a KartuKeluarga

. The Kartu Keluarga is a family card which bears the legal names of allfamily members.

 

Indonesia did not allow foreign students to attend their schools andIndonesia Immigration Officials and the Police frequently visited the schools to

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

68

ensure the students attending were all Indonesian citizens pursuant to the laws. At

the time Obama attended school in Jakarta Indonesia, Indonesia did not allow foreign

students to attend their public schools.

188. Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges Obama stated his citizenship as

Kenyan on his College Admission forms to Occidental College, Columbia University

and Harvard Law School.

189. Furthermore, Obama traveled to Indonesia, Pakistan and Southern India in 1981. The

relations between Pakistan and India were extremely tense and Pakistan was in

turmoil and under martial law. The country was filled with Afghan refugees; and

Pakistan’s Islamist-leaning Interservices Intelligence Agency (ISI) had begun to

provide arms to the Afghan mujahideen and to assist the process of recruiting

radicalized Muslim men–jihadists–from around the world to fight against the Soviet

Union. Pakistan was so dangerous that it was on the State Department’s travel ban

list for US Citizens. Non-Muslim visitors were not welcome unless sponsored by

their embassy for official business. A Muslim citizen of Indonesia traveling on an

Indonesian passport would have success entering Indonesia, Pakistan and India.

Therefore, it is believed Obama traveled on his Indonesian passport entering the

Countries. Indonesian passports require renewal every five (5) years. At the time of

Obama’s travels to Indonesia, Pakistan and India, Obama was twenty (20) years old.

If Obama would have been a U.S. citizen, which he was not, 8 USC §1481(a)(2)

provides loss of nationality by native born citizens upon “taking an oath or making an

affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state…after having

attained the age of eighteen years”, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1401(a)(1).

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

69

190. If in fact Obama ever had citizenship, he lost his citizenship by becoming a “natural”

citizen of Indonesia. Obama could have gained United States “naturalized”

citizenship status, however, he and/or his family would have been required to file the

appropriate Immigration paperwork and obtain a Certification of Citizenship, which

Obama and his family failed to do.

191. For the reason’s stated herein Obama is still a citizen of Indonesia and is not a

United States “natural born” citizen, he is not a “naturalized” citizen of the United

States and is here in the United States as an “illegal alien”.

WHEREFORE

,  

Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, respectfully prays thatthis Court:

A. Order Defendant to prove his citizenship status and immediately turn over

the following documents:

1. A certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) birth

certificate;

2. Certified copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates of

Obama in the names referred to in the caption of this lawsuit;

3. A certified copy of Obama’s Certification of Citizenship;

4. A certified copy of Obama’s Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of

majority;

5. Certified copies of Obama’s Admission forms for Occidental

College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School; and

6. Certified copies of any Court Orders or legal documents changing

Obama’s name from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama.

B. Issue a Declaratory Judgment against Defendant Barack Hussein Obama,

a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry

Z:\Forms\Obama, First Amended Complaint 100608

70

Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham declaring he is not a U.S. “natural born” citizen,

he is not a “naturalized” citizen and he is still an Indonesian citizen.

C. Order Defendant Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry

Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham

removed from the Presidential Ballot until his citizenship status can in fact be

verified ensuring he is eligible to serve as the President of the United States;

D. Preliminary and permanently enjoin Defendant Barack Hussein Obama,

a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Soetoro, a/k/a Barry

Dunham, a/k/a Barack Dunham from any further campaigning and from running

for the United States Office of the President until he is able to prove his

citizenship status and eligibility to hold the United States Office of the

Presidency;

E. Award Plaintiff such costs and fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and

other applicable law; and

F. Grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems just and

proper.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Philip J. Berg

Dated: October 6, 2008 _______________________

Philip J. Berg, Esquire

Attorney in

 

Pro Se555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

Identification No. 09867

(610) 825-3134

,

 

,

.”

, , , , ,

,

Philip J Berg lawsuit, October 2, 2008, Update, Obama motion, US State Department denies subpoena request, Jeff Schreiber update, Judge Surrick, No decision

There has been no decision from Judge Surrick regarding Philip J Berg’s
response to Obama’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit. Philip J Berg’s
subpoena request to the U.S. State Department has also been denied.
Jeff Schreiber provides an update:
“Berg’s Subpoena Request Denied by U.S. State Department

Philip Berg hit a speed bump this afternoon. In a letter from David Newman of the Office of Legal Adviser for the U.S. Department of State, his attempted service of subpoena on the Vital Records Section of the State Department and a pair of U.S. embassies was rejected.

I’ve known for a few weeks now that Phil Berg intended to subpoena several entities with regard to documentation sought to support his allegations in his federal case against Barack Obama, the Democratic National Committee, and the Federal Election Commission, but kept quiet because Berg discussed this with me off the record, and I must honor that. While I was not able to obtain a copy of the letter as it is technically not yet a matter of public record, I was able to copy the language inside.”
“As of 2:28 p.m. today, there has been no decision by Judge Surrick.”

Read more from Jeff Schreiber here:

http://www.americasright.com/
I checked the Pacer system a few minutes ago and found no evidence of
the judge making a ruling.

To Sarah Palin from Citizen Wells, Biden question, Debate, October 2, 2008, Obama motion to dismiss Philip J Berg lawsuit

Sarah Palin, here is my question for you to ask Joe Biden:

Mr. Biden, why did Barack Obama file a motion to dismiss the lawsuit from Philip J Berg instead of proving his citizenship?

Why didn’t Obama provide a vault COLB?

John McCain provided a vault COLB to congress.

Is Obama an illegal alien?

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Response to Obama motion, Jeff Schreiber update, Judge Surrick order, Ruling, Obama must prove citizenship?, Supreme Court next?

Jeff Schreiber, law student, legal writer and blog owner contacted Citizen Wells on this blog last night. Here is Jeff Schreiber’s comment:

“We’ll see on the standing issue.

I’m expecting an order from Judge Surrick any day now — in fact, I’m surprised it hasn’t come down before now.

To the folks here at Citizen Wells:

As of now, 3:36am on Wednesday, my blog site (www.americasright.com) is down due to a problem with Google. Should something happen in the court, I may very likely get a hold of it before anybody else as I have worked alongside these people every day for six years.

If anything does come down the pipe and I cannot put it up on my own site, I’d like to e-mail it to you”

I sent an email to Jeff. He is always welcome on this blog.

Jeff Schreiber is on top of this lawsuit and last night put up several interesting articles regarding the constitutional and legal aspects of presidential citizenship requirements. I strongly recommend that you visit his site:

http://www.americasright.com/

Don’t wait on the judicial system, voice your opinion here:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Response to Obama motion to dismiss, update, September 30, 2008, Berg has standing, Obama vault birth certificate, Oath of allegiance

The Citizen Wells blog provided real time updates yesterday, September 29, 2008, of the Philip J Berg response to the Obama motion to dismiss. We posted an analysis by Jeff Schreiber of the response draft and posted the filed response from the Pacer system. Last night Mr. Berg posted a summarization of the response on his website. Here is Philip J Berg’s response:

“Philip J. Berg filed a response this afternoon to the motion for dismissal filed last week in Berg vs. Obama by Senator Obama and the Democratic National Committee. The response “PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT THEREOF TO DEFENDANT’S, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE’S, MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6)” asserts that, the defendants’ argument to the contrary, Mr. Berg has standing to pursue the case.

Mr. Berg provides precedents which he argues establish his standing and petitions the Court to deny dismissal and order the defendants to produce the documents in the previously requested discovery.

The conclusion of Mr. Berg’s brief reads:

Plaintiff served discovery in way of Admissions and Request for Production of Documents, on Defendants on September 15, 2008 and has attempted to obtain verification of Obama’s eligibility through Subpoenas to the Government entities and the Hospital’s in Hawaii. To date, Plaintiff has not received the requested discovery from the Defendants and two (2) of the locations, which subpoenas were served upon, refused to honor the subpoena.

For the above aforementioned reasons, Plaintiff respectfully request Defendants Barack Hussein Obama and the Democratic National Committee’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) be denied and order immediate discovery, including but not limited to: 1) a certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) Birth Certificate; and (2) a certified copy of Obama’s Certificate of Citizenship; and (3) a certified copy of the Oath of Allegiance taken by Obama taken at the age of majority. If the Court is inclined to grant Defendants motion, Plaintiff respectfully requests the opportunity to amend his Complaint pursuant to the findings of this Honorable Court.

The complete filing is attached. Due to a problem with the Electronic Filing System, the filing was made via fax and will appear in PACER later this evening or on Tuesday”

Go to Philip J Berg’s website, read more, view the entire response and by all means, contribute to this important effort:

http://www.obamacrimes.com

Visit the Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Philip J Berg response to Obama motion to dismiss, September 29, 2008,Berg states standing, Obama must prove US citizenship, Vault COLB, Allegiance pledge

Here is the entirety of Philip J Berg’s response to Obama’s motion to dismiss:

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                      

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE, :

 

 

 

 

 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE, :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE, :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plaintiff

 

 

 

 

 

:

 

 

 

 

 

 

vs.

 

 

 

 

 

:CIVIL ACTION NO: 08-cv- 04083

:

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL, :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defendants

 

 

 

 

 

:

ORDER

ON DEFENDANT’S, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATIC

NATIONAL COMMITTEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6)

THIS CAUSE

 

 

 

 

 

came before the United States District Court Judge, Honorable R.

Barclay Surrick on Defendant’s Barack Hussein Obama and the Democratic National

Committee’s Motion to Dismiss. Having reviewed the Motion and Plaintiff’s Opposition

to said Motion and for good cause shown, it is hereby

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ORDERED

 

 

 

 

 

that the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) and

 

12(b)(6) is

 

 

 

 

 

DENIED. It is further ORDER

of this Court that the following discovery is

to be turned over to Plaintiff within three (3) days:

1. Obama’s “vault” version (certified copy of his “original” long version)

Birth Certificate; and

2. A certified copy of Obama’s Certification of Citizenship;

3. A Certified copy of Obama’s Oath of Allegiance.

 

 

 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: September ______, 2008

______________________________

Hon. R. Barclay Surrick

United States District Court Judge

For the Eastern District of PA

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 1 of 35

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE, :

 

 

 

 

 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE, :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PHILIP J. BERG, ESQUIRE, :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plaintiff

 

 

 

 

 

:

 

 

 

 

 

 

vs.

 

 

 

 

 

:CIVIL ACTION NO: 08-cv- 04083

:

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL, :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defendants

 

 

 

 

 

:

PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT THEREOF TO

DEFENDANT’S, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATIC

NATIONAL COMMITTEE’S, MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6)

Plaintiff Philip J. Berg, Esquire [hereinafter “Plaintiff”] files the within

Opposition and Brief in support thereof to Defendant’s, Barack Hussein Obama

[hereinafter “Obama”] and the Democratic National Committee’s [hereinafter “DNC”]

Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) on the following

grounds:

• Plaintiff has standing to bring suit against Obama and the DNC pursuant

to the following:

(1) Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to 5 United States Code. §702;

(2)

 

 

 

 

 

Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to FEC v. Akins

, 524 U.S. 11 (1998);

   

(3)

 

 

 

 

 

Plaintiff has Standing Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1481(b);

(4) Plaintiff has Standing under 5 U.S.C. §552(B);

(5) Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1343, Civil Rights

and Elective Franchise; and

(6) Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to Federal Question Jurisdiction.

• Claims are stated in which relief can be granted. Pleadings in a Complaint

are that of Notice Pleading and not Fact Pleading;

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 2 of 35

   

• Plaintiff has suffered

 

 

 

 

 

and imminently will suffer injury – an invasion of a

legally protected interest which is concrete and particularized; and

   

 

 

 

 

 

The injury suffered by Plaintiff is the kind of injury that Congress

expected might be addressed under the statute. Plaintiff is within the zone of interest

protected by the statute or constitutional provision.

• It is imperative Obama be Court Ordered to turn over the following items

in order resolve the issues presented prior to the Presidential Election:

(a) A certified copy of Obama’s “vault” version ( “original” long

version) Birth Certificate; and

(b). A certified copy of Obama’s Certification of Citizenship; and

(c) A Certified copy of Obama’s Oath of Allegiance.

At the time Plaintiff’s Complaint was filed, Plaintiff was requesting protections

from the Court in order to stop Obama from being nominated by the DNC as the

Democratic Presidential Nominee as Obama is not eligible to serve as President of the

United States. However, Obama was nominated by the DNC as the Democratic

Presidential Nominee. For this reason, Plaintiff must amend his Complaint and will be

requesting this Court leave to file a First Amended Complaint.

A. OVERVIEW OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Plaintiff is a life long Democrat who had always been proud of his Party.

Plaintiff is a licensed attorney in good standing and has taken an oath to uphold the

United States Constitution. Plaintiff has donated money and billable hours to Democratic

Presidential candidates as well as to the Democratic National Committee. Plaintiff has

relied on the DNC’s promises to uphold our Constitution, which includes properly

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 3 of 35

vetting our Presidential Nominee and ensuring our Party’s Nominee is eligible to serve as

President of the United States pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of our United States

Constitution.

In addition, Plaintiff has trusted the Federal Election Committee (“FEC”) that

they would ensure our Presidential and Congress candidates were eligible for the

positions which they were seeking and running a fair and legitimate campaign process.

Plaintiff has relied on the FEC, DNC and all our Elected Office Holders to uphold our

Constitution and to ensure an illegal alien and/or a naturalized citizen would not be able

to secure the position of President of the United States.

The DNC has pledged and promised Plaintiff and all Democratic individuals they

believe that our Constitution, our courts, our institutions and our traditions are proper and

work.

The DNC pledged and promised Plaintiff and all Democratic individuals they will

ensure our Constitution is not a nuisance and have assured Plaintiff and democratic

individuals the United States Constitution is the foundation of our democracy. It makes

freedom and self-governance possible, and helps to protect our security. The Democratic

Party has pledged and promised Plaintiff and other Democratic individuals they will

maintain and restore our Constitution to its proper place in our government and return

our Nation to the best traditions, including their commitment to government by law.

Based on the DNC’s promises and assurances, Plaintiff and other democratic

individuals have donated money in good faith to the DNC and other Democratic

Presidential Nominees. Money donated to the DNC is used to

 

 

 

 

 

plan the Party’s

quadrennial presidential nominating convention; promote the election of eligible Party

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 4 of 35

candidates, pursuant to the United States Constitution, Article II, Section I, with both

technical and financial support; and works with national, state and local party

organizations, elected officials, candidates and constituencies to respond to the needs and

views of the Democratic electorate and the nation.

In vetting the Presidential candidate, among other things, the DNC and FEC are

required to ensure the eligibility requirements pursuant to our Constitution are met and

the Presidential nominee, if elected, is qualified and eligible to serve pursuant to our

United States Constitution.

In order to be eligible and qualified to run for the Office of the President of the

United States you must be a “natural born” citizen. United States Constitution, Article II,

Section I.

There appears to be no question that Defendant Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann

Dunham, was a U.S. citizen. It is also undisputed, however, that his father, Barack

Obama, Sr., was a citizen of Kenya. Obama’s parents, according to divorce records,

were married on or about February 2, 1961.

Defendant Obama claims he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961

and it is uncertain in which hospital he claims to have been born. Obama’s grandmother

on his father’s side, his half-brother and half-sister all claim Obama was born not in

Hawaii but in Kenya. Reports reflect that Obama’s mother traveled to Kenya during her

pregnancy; however, she was prevented from boarding a flight from Kenya to Hawaii at

her late stage of pregnancy (which, apparently, was a normal restriction, to avoid births

during a flight). By these reports, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama gave birth to Obama in

Kenya, after which she flew home and registered Obama’s birth. There are records of a

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 5 of 35

“registry of birth” for Obama, on or about August 8, 1961 in the public records office in

Hawaii.

Upon investigation into the alleged birth of Obama in Honolulu, Hawaii,

Obama’s birth is reported as occurring at two (2) separate hospitals, Kapiolani Hospital

and Queens Hospital. Wikipedia English Version, under the subject “Barack Obama,”

states Obama was born at Kapiolani Hospital. Wikipedia Italian Version, under the

subject “Queens Hospital,” states Barack Obama was born in Queens Hospital.

Furthermore, the Rainbow Edition News Letter, November 2004 Edition, published by

the Education Laboratory School, attached as

 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT “1”

, did a several page article

of an interview with Obama and his half-sister, Maya. The Rainbow Edition News Letter

reports Obama was born August 4, 1961 at Queens Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii.

More interesting in February 2008, Obama’s half-sister, Maya, was again interviewed in

the Star Bulletin, attached as

 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT “2”

, and this time, Maya states Obama was

born August 4, 1961 in Kapiolani Medical Center for Women & Children.

Wayne Madsen, Journalist with Online Journal as a contributing writer published

an article on June 9, 2008 stating that a research team went to Mombassa, Kenya, and

located a Certificate Registering the birth of Barack Obama, Jr. to his father, a Kenyan

citizen and his mother, a U.S. citizen, attached as

 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT “3”

.

Even if Obama was, in fact, born in Hawaii, he lost his U.S. citizenship when his

mother re-married and moved to Indonesia with her Indonesian husband. In or about

1966, when Obama was approximately five (5) years old, his mother, Stanley Ann

Dunham, married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia, whom she had met at the Hawaii

University, and moved to Indonesia with Obama. Obama lost his U.S. citizenship,

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 6 of 35

when his mother married Lolo Soetoro, and took up residency in Indonesia. Loss of

citizenship, in these circumstances, under U.S. law (as in effect in 1967) required that

foreign citizenship be achieved through “application.” Such type of naturalization

occurred, for example, when a person acquired a foreign nationality by marriage to a

national of that country. Nationality Act of 1940, Section 317(b). A minor child follows

the naturalization and citizenship status of their custodial parent. A further issue is

presented that Obama’s Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, either signed an

acknowledgement acknowledging Obama as his son or Lolo Soetoro adopted Obama,

giving Obama natural Indonesia citizenship which explains the name Barry Soetoro and

his citizenship listed as Indonesian.

Obama admits in his book, “

 

 

 

 

 

Dreams from my father

” Obama’s memoir

(autobiography), that after his mother and Lolo Soetoro were married, Lolo Soetoro left

Hawaii rather suddenly and Obama and his mother spent months in preparation for their

move to Indonesia. Obama admits when he arrived in Indonesia he had already been

enrolled in an Indonesia school and his relatives were waiting to meet him and his

mother. Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian State citizen, could not have enrolled Obama in

school unless Lolo Soetoro signed an acknowledgement acknowledging Obama as his

son, which had to be filed with the Government. Under Indonesian law, when a male

acknowledges a child as his son, it deems the son, in this case Obama, as an Indonesian

State citizen. Constitution of Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 62 of 1958 Law No. 12 of

2006 dated 1 Aug. 2006 concerning Citizenship of Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 9 of

1992 dated 31 Mar. 1992 concerning Immigration Affairs and Indonesian Civil Code

(Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata) (KUHPer) (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie)

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 7 of 35

   

states in pertinent part,

 

 

 

 

 

State citizens of Indonesia include:

(viii) children who are born

outside of legal marriage from foreign State citizen mother who are acknowledged by

father who is Indonesian State citizen as his children and that acknowledgment is made

prior to children reaching 18 years of age or prior to marriage;

 

 

 

 

 

Republic of Indonesia

 

Constitution 1945,

 

 

 

 

 

As amended by the First Amendment of 1999, the Second

Amendment of 2000, the Third Amendment of 2001 and the Fourth Amendment of 2002,

 

 

 

 

Chapter X, Citizens and Residents, Article 26 states,

 

 

 

 

 

“(1) Citizens shall consist of

indigenous Indonesian peoples and persons of foreign origin who have been legalized

[sic] as citizens in accordance with law. (2) Residents shall consist of Indonesian

citizens and foreign nationals living in Indonesia

 

 

 

 

 

.”

Furthermore, under the Indonesian adoption law, once adopted by an Indonesian

citizen, the adoption severs the child’s relationship to the birth parents,

 

 

 

 

 

and the adopted 

child is given the same status as a natural child

The laws in Indonesia at the time of Obama’s arrival did not allow dual

citizenship. If an Indonesian citizen married a foreigner, as in this case, Obama’s mother

was required to renounce her U.S. citizenship and was sponsored by her Indonesian

spouse. The public schools did not allow foreign students, only citizens were allowed to

attend as Indonesia was under strict rule and decreed a number of restrictions; therefore,

in order for Obama to have attended school in Jakarta, which he did, he had to be a

citizen of Indonesia, as the citizenship status of enrolled students was verified with

Government records.

Obama was enrolled by his parents in a public school, Fransiskus Assisi School in

Jakarta, Indonesia. Plaintiff has received copies of the school registration, attached as

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 8 of 35

 

 

 

 

 

 

The laws in Indonesia at the time of Obama’s arrival did not allow dual

citizenship. If an Indonesian citizen married a foreigner, as in this case, Obama’s mother

was required to renounce her U.S. citizenship and was sponsored by her Indonesian

spouse. The public schools did not allow foreign students, only citizens were allowed to

attend as Indonesia was under strict rule and decreed a number of restrictions; therefore,

in order for Obama to have attended school in Jakarta, which he did, he had to be a

citizen of Indonesia, as the citizenship status of enrolled students was verified with

Government records.

Obama was enrolled by his parents in a public school, Fransiskus Assisi School in

Jakarta, Indonesia. Plaintiff has received copies of the school registration, attached as

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 8 of 35

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 8 of 35

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT “4”

 

 

 

 

 

, in which it clearly states Obama’s name as “Barry Soetoro,” and lists his

citizenship as Indonesian. Obama’s father is listed as Lolo Soetoro, Obama’s date of

birth and place of birth are listed as August 4, 1961 in Hawaii, and Obama’s Religion is

listed as Islam. This document was verified by television show

 

 

 

 

 

Inside Edition

, whose

reporter, Matt Meagher, took the actual footage of the school record. At the time Obama

was registered the public schools obtained and verified the citizenship status and name of

the student through the Indonesian Government. All Indonesian students were required

to carry government identity cards, or

 

 

 

 

 

Karty Tanda Pendudaks

, as well as family card

 

identification called a

 

 

 

 

 

Kartu Keluarga. The

Kartu Keluarga is a family card which bears the legal

names of all family members.

Since Obama’s birth was legally acknowledged by Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian

citizen, and/or Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, which the evidence attached hereto

supports, Obama became an Indonesian citizen

 

 

 

 

 

and bears the status as an Indonesia

natural child (natural-born). For this reason, Obama would have been required to file

applications with the U. S. State Department and follow the legal procedures to become a

naturalized citizen in the United States, when he returned from Indonesia. If Obama

and/or his family failed to follow these procedures, then Obama is an illegal alien.

Regardless of whether Obama was officially adopted, (which required a Court

process), by his Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, or his birth was acknowledged

(which only required the signing of a birth acknowledgement form), by Lolo Soetoro,

one of which had to occur in order for Obama to have the name Barry Soetoro and his

citizenship status listed as “Indonesian”, in either and/or both cases Obama’s name was

required to be changed to the Indonesian father’s name, and Obama became a natural

citizen of Indonesia. This is proven by the school records in Jakarta, Indonesia showing

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 9 of 35

   

Obama’s name as Barry Soetoro and his citizenship as Indonesian.

 

 

 

 

 

Again

, the

registration of a child in the public schools in Jakarta, Indonesia was verified with the

Government Records on file with the Governmental Agencies.

 

 

 

 

 

The

 

 

 

 

Indonesian citizenship law was designed to prevent apatride (stateless) or bipatride (dual

citizenship). Indonesian regulations recognize neither apatride nor bipatride citizenship.

In addition, since Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship neither did the United States, Hague

Convention of 1930.

 

 

 

 

In or about 1971, Obama’s mother sent Obama back to Hawaii. Obama was ten

(10) years of age upon his return to Hawaii.

As a result of Obama’s Indonesia “natural” citizenship status, there is absolutely

 

 

 

 

 

 

In or about 1971, Obama’s mother sent Obama back to Hawaii. Obama was ten

(10) years of age upon his return to Hawaii.

As a result of Obama’s Indonesia “natural” citizenship status, there is absolutely

 

 

 

 

 

The

 

 

 

 

Indonesian citizenship law was designed to prevent apatride (stateless) or bipatride (dual

citizenship). Indonesian regulations recognize neither apatride nor bipatride citizenship.

In addition, since Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship neither did the United States, Hague

Convention of 1930.

 

 

 

 

In or about 1971, Obama’s mother sent Obama back to Hawaii. Obama was ten

(10) years of age upon his return to Hawaii.

As a result of Obama’s Indonesia “natural” citizenship status, there is absolutely

 

 

 

 

 

 

In or about 1971, Obama’s mother sent Obama back to Hawaii. Obama was ten

(10) years of age upon his return to Hawaii.

As a result of Obama’s Indonesia “natural” citizenship status, there is absolutely

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

no

 

 

 

 

 

way Obama could have ever regained U.S. “natural born” status, if he in fact ever

 

held such. Obama could have

 

 

 

 

 

only

become naturalized if the proper paperwork was filed

with the U.S. State Department, in which case, Obama would have received a

Certification of Citizenship.

Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges Obama was never Naturalized

in the United States after his return. Obama was ten (10) years old when he returned to

Hawaii to live with his grandparents. Obama’s mother did not return with him, and

therefore, unable to apply for citizenship of Obama in the United States. If citizenship of

Obama had ever been applied for, Obama would have a Certification of Citizenship.

Furthermore, Obama traveled to Indonesia, Pakistan and Southern India in 1981.

The relations between Pakistan and India were extremely tense and Pakistan was in

turmoil and under martial law. The country was filled with Afghan refugees; and

Pakistan’s Islamist-leaning Interservices Intelligence Agency (ISI) had begun to provide

arms to the Afghan mujahideen and to assist the process of recruiting radicalized Muslim

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 10 of 35

men–jihadists–from around the world to fight against the Soviet Union. Pakistan was so

dangerous that it was on the State Department’s travel ban list for US Citizens. Non-

Muslim visitors were not welcome unless sponsored by their embassy for official

business. A Muslim citizen of Indonesia traveling on an Indonesian passport would have

success entering Indonesia, Pakistan and India. Therefore, it is believed Obama traveled

on his Indonesian passport entering the Countries. Indonesian passports require renewal

every five (5) years. At the time of Obama’s travels to Indonesia, Pakistan and India,

Obama was twenty (20) years old. If Obama would have been a U.S. citizen, which he

was not, 8 USC §1481(a)(2) provides loss of nationality by native born citizens upon

“taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a

foreign state…after having attained the age of eighteen years”, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§1401(a)(1) Since Lolo Soetoro legally acknowledged Obama as his son and/or

adopted Obama, Obama was a “natural” citizen of Indonesia, as proven by Obama’s

school record attached as

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit “4”

.

Plaintiffs as well as many other democratic American citizens have requested

proof of Obama’s citizenship status, however to no avail. Obama has promised to be an

open and honest candidate, however, refuses to remove any doubts from Plaintiff’s and

all the other democratic minds and prove his eligibility to serve as President of the United

States.

Plaintiff’s civil rights under the due process rights and equal protection of the

laws secured by the U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth (14

 

 

 

 

 

th

) Amendment have been violated

by Obama’s illegal campaign and will continue to be violated if Obama is allowed to

continue his campaign and if elected, assume the position of President of the United

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 11 of 35

States. The DNC and FEC have allowed Obama to continue his campaigning, knowing

these issues have arisen and have failed to take and/or instigate the proper investigation

into said matters to protect Plaintiff and other registered voters. Therefore, the only

option Plaintiff had to secure and protect his civil rights was to bring action before this

Honorable Court. Moreover, our laws which protect Plaintiff, a legal registered voter,

and other registered voters from fraudulent campaign schemes have been violated by the

Defendants, 2 U.S.C. §437c, 2 U.S.C §437(g). Plaintiff has standing to bring suit

pursuant to 5 U.S. C §702, as well as 8 U.S. C §1481(b).

Plaintiff’s rights guaranteed under the Liberty clause of the Fourteenth (14

 

 

 

 

 

th

)

Amendment of the United States Constitution have already been violated. It has been

announced in the main stream media that Obama’s “briefing” has already begun into our

National Secrets, our Nations Top Secrets, which Obama is not privy too and in violation

of our National Security, as Obama is not a legal citizen of the United States. This has

placed Plaintiff and other citizens of the United States in grave danger. Plaintiff’s

Liberty as guaranteed will further be violated if Obama is allowed to be voted into and

assume the position of President of the United States; Plaintiff will be further damaged

and is in serious jeopardy.

Plaintiff filed the within action on or about August 21, 2008 against Defendants

seeking Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, declaring Obama an illegal alien and/or only a

“naturalized” citizen ineligible to serve as President of the United States and enjoining

the DNC and FEC from placing Obama’s name on the ballot and prohibiting Obama

from further campaigning to be elected as President of the United States, a position he is

ineligible to hold.

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 12 of 35

Plaintiff faxed a copy of the complaint to Obama, the DNC and FEC on August

22, 2008 prior to the hearing on the TRO before this Honorable Court. Defendants were

further served by personal service on September 4, 2008. Neither the DNC nor Obama

have supplied any type of proof of Obama’s citizenship status and/or eligibility to serve

as President of the United States. Instead, they waited until the last hour and filed their

Motion to Dismiss.

Plaintiff has asked for a simple resolution. Plaintiff has asked that Obama supply

a genuine certified copy of his original long version “vault” Birth Certificate and a

certified copy of his Oath of Allegiance and/or Certificate of Citizenship. If in fact

Obama can prove his “natural born” citizenship status, which he

 

 

 

 

 

cannot

, then he has not

been prejudiced in anyway, but instead Plaintiff has been protected and his civil rights

secured. However, if Obama is unable to supply said documentation, then he needs to

withdrawal his candidacy, again which will eliminate Plaintiff’s deprivations and instill

Plaintiff’s constitutionally protected safeguards and rights.

There is absolutely

 

 

 

 

 

no

other way for Plaintiff to ensure his constitutionally

protected rights. The only option Plaintiff had was to bring this action. This is the first

time in American History a “naturalized” citizen and/or illegal alien have been allowed to

campaign for the Office of President of the United States. There are not any other ways

to establish or determine the legal status of our Presidential Candidates, whether

Republican and/or Democratic. The FEC and DNC have refused to verify and furnish

Plaintiff with Obama’s eligibility or lack thereof. Plaintiff has standing to challenge any

person(s) citizenship and/or nationality status pursuant to statute, 8 U.S. C. §1481(b).

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 13 of 35

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) does not perform background checks

and/or verify their eligibility on our Candidates to hold Office. According to the FBI,

once a candidate is voted into Office of Congress, they are members of Congress and

therefore they are given a Secret Clearance, again, without any type of background check

and/or verification processes performed.

Plaintiff, as well as other Democratic voters have and are suffering the total loss

of confidence in the DNC primary process because of the massive cheating and

skewering of rules to make an illegitimate ineligible candidate the nominee in violation

of DNC rules and the Constitution, robbing voters of their voices and votes. Plaintiff and

millions of other Democratic voters have lost all trust in the integrity of the FEC and

Democratic Party leaders by the total failure of the DNC to perform the most basic of

functions by insisting any candidates produce basic documents in vetting their eligibility,

especially after there were repeated requests demanding Obama’s eligibility be proven

with certified legitimate documents which had not been forged. This failure to perform

even the most basic of due diligence has shattered Plaintiff’s faith, along with millions of

Democratic voters, in the Democratic system.

Plaintiff has been damaged financially for all monies donated, billable hours

spent supporting the Democratic candidates, taxes paid by Plaintiff which went to the

Secret Service for their protection of Obama for the past twenty (20) months and for the

financial costs and time expended of this litigation, when Defendants could have very

easily investigated, verified and obtained proof of Obama’s eligibility to serve as

President of the United States, if in fact he is eligible.

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 14 of 35

Plaintiff has suffered damage to his reputation and discrimination as a result of

attempting to protect his rights and verify the eligibility of Obama to serve as President

of the United States. Plaintiff has been repeatedly called a racist and verbally assaulted

for bringing forward this lawsuit against Obama. Plaintiff is not a racist and is a paid

Life Member of the NAACP. Obama himself stated to a crowd of his supporters,

 

 

 

 

 

“I

need you to go out and talk to your friends and talk to your neighbors. I want you to

talk to them whether they are independent or whether they are Republican. I want you

to argue with them and get in their face”

 

 

 

 

 

, see the newspaper article published in the San

Francisco Gate, by Kathleen Hennessey, Associated Press Writer, on September 17,

2008, attached as

 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT “5”

. Obama is promoting attacks on non-supporters,

which is creating racial tension and violence in our communities.

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the verification and proof requested herein by

way of requests, filing this action, Admissions and Request for Production of Documents

served upon Defendants September 15, 2008 and by Subpoenas served upon agencies

who could supply the documentation to prove Obama’s citizenship status. To date,

Plaintiff has not received anything. Plaintiff has received two (2) letters from agencies

that were served with subpoenas claiming they need Obama’s signatures to comply

and/or the confidentiality of the documents were protected from disclosure to third

parties under 5 U.S. C. § 552. See

 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBITS “6” and “7”

.

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 15 of 35

B. THIS HONORABLE COURT HAS SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION AS PLAINTIFF HAS STANDING TO BRING THE WITHIN

ACTION

The DNC and Obama have filed a Motion to Dismiss based on Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(1), claiming this Court does not have subject matter

jurisdiction as Plaintiff lacks standing. This claim is inaccurate, as this Court does have

subject matter jurisdiction and has the inherent power to hear this case.

However, Plaintiff requests the opportunity to amend his Complaint.

This case is easily distinguishable from

 

 

 

 

 

Hollander v. McCain

, 2008 U.S. Dist.

LEXIS 56729 (D.N.H. 2008), where the Court held that the Plaintiff did not have

standing based on the alleged harm he would suffer should McCain be elected President

despite his alleged lack of eligibility under the natural born citizenship clause, Art. II, §

1, cl. 4.

The factors used in the Court’s decision were that: (1) McCain’s candidacy for the

presidency, whatever his eligibility, was “hardly a restriction on voters’ rights” because it

in no way prevented them from voting for somebody else in the primary election; and (2)

the harm claimed “standing alone, would adversely affect only the generalized interest of

all citizens in constitutional governance” (the Court citing

 

 

 

 

 

Schlesinger v. Reservists

 

 

 

Committee to Stop the War

 

 

 

 

 

, 418 U.S. 208, 217(1974); and (3) Plaintiff did not “allege

personal injury fairly traceable to the Defendant’s allegedly unlawful conduct” (the Court

cited

 

 

 

 

 

Allen v. Wright

, 468 U.S. 737(1984) at 751; and (4) McCain was “unquestionably

an American citizen.”

In this case, (1) Obama’s candidacy for the presidency in the general election as

opposed to the primary elections prevents citizens from voting for Hillary Clinton despite

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 16 of 35

her immense popularity; (2) the harm Plaintiff suffered is particular to him because he

has been denied the constitutional right to vote for an eligible candidate; (3) Plaintiff’s

claims are traceable to the Defendants’ unlawful behavior in failing to disclose

information to which voters are entitled; and (4) Defendants have failed to show that Mr.

Obama is “unquestionably an American citizen.”

Therefore, the factors used in

 

 

 

 

 

Hollander v. McCain

clearly favor Plaintiff’s

standing.

 

 

 

 

1. Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to 5 United States Code. §702

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack thereof. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the

complaints and requests. In addition, Plaintiff has attempted to secure documents from

other locations, which are required to turn the documents over pursuant to FOIA,

however, once again has been refused. The DNC and FEC have failed to act in their

Official position and take the steps necessary to turn over the documents and institute a

proper investigation to protect Plaintiff.

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to 5 United States Code. §702

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack thereof. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the

complaints and requests. In addition, Plaintiff has attempted to secure documents from

other locations, which are required to turn the documents over pursuant to FOIA,

however, once again has been refused. The DNC and FEC have failed to act in their

Official position and take the steps necessary to turn over the documents and institute a

proper investigation to protect Plaintiff.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack thereof. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the

complaints and requests. In addition, Plaintiff has attempted to secure documents from

other locations, which are required to turn the documents over pursuant to FOIA,

however, once again has been refused. The DNC and FEC have failed to act in their

Official position and take the steps necessary to turn over the documents and institute a

proper investigation to protect Plaintiff.

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 United States Code §702

 

 

 

 

 

 

states:

“A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected

or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled to

judicial review thereof. An action in a court of the United States seeking relief other than

money damages and stating a claim that an agency or an officer or employee thereof

acted or failed to act in an official capacity or under color of legal authority shall not be

dismissed nor relief therein be denied on the ground that it is against the United States or

that the United States is an indispensable party. The United States may be named as a

defendant in any such action, and a judgment or decree may be entered against the United

States: Provided, that any mandatory or injunctive decree shall specify the Federal officer

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 17 of 35

or officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for

compliance. Nothing herein

(1) “affects other limitations on judicial review or the power or duty of the

court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or

equitable ground; or

(2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants consent to

suit expressly or impliedly forbids the relief which is sought.”

The FEC and the DNC have failed to take any action into the investigation of

Obama, his fraudulent campaigning scheme which he has obtained over $400 Million

Dollars, knowing he is not a U.S. Citizen.

   

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 17 of 35

or officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for

compliance. Nothing herein

(1) “affects other limitations on judicial review or the power or duty of the

court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or

equitable ground; or

(2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants consent to

suit expressly or impliedly forbids the relief which is sought.”

The FEC and the DNC have failed to take any action into the investigation of

Obama, his fraudulent campaigning scheme which he has obtained over $400 Million

Dollars, knowing he is not a U.S. Citizen.

   

 

 

or officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for

compliance. Nothing herein

(1) “affects other limitations on judicial review or the power or duty of the

court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or

equitable ground; or

(2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants consent to

suit expressly or impliedly forbids the relief which is sought.”

The FEC and the DNC have failed to take any action into the investigation of

Obama, his fraudulent campaigning scheme which he has obtained over $400 Million

Dollars, knowing he is not a U.S. Citizen.

   

 

2. Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to

 

 

 

 

FEC v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998)

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack there of and has requested investigation into the eligibility

status of Obama. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the complaints and

requests.

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to

 

 

 

 

FEC v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998)

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack there of and has requested investigation into the eligibility

status of Obama. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the complaints and

requests.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack there of and has requested investigation into the eligibility

status of Obama. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the complaints and

requests.

 

 

 

 

 

5 United States Code §702

 

 

 

 

 

 

states:

“A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected

or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled to

judicial review thereof. An action in a court of the United States seeking relief other than

money damages and stating a claim that an agency or an officer or employee thereof

acted or failed to act in an official capacity or under color of legal authority shall not be

dismissed nor relief therein be denied on the ground that it is against the United States or

that the United States is an indispensable party. The United States may be named as a

defendant in any such action, and a judgment or decree may be entered against the United

States: Provided, that any mandatory or injunctive decree shall specify the Federal officer

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 17 of 35

or officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for

compliance. Nothing herein

(1) “affects other limitations on judicial review or the power or duty of the

court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or

equitable ground; or

(2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants consent to

suit expressly or impliedly forbids the relief which is sought.”

The FEC and the DNC have failed to take any action into the investigation of

Obama, his fraudulent campaigning scheme which he has obtained over $400 Million

Dollars, knowing he is not a U.S. Citizen.

   

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 17 of 35

or officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for

compliance. Nothing herein

(1) “affects other limitations on judicial review or the power or duty of the

court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or

equitable ground; or

(2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants consent to

suit expressly or impliedly forbids the relief which is sought.”

The FEC and the DNC have failed to take any action into the investigation of

Obama, his fraudulent campaigning scheme which he has obtained over $400 Million

Dollars, knowing he is not a U.S. Citizen.

   

 

 

or officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for

compliance. Nothing herein

(1) “affects other limitations on judicial review or the power or duty of the

court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or

equitable ground; or

(2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants consent to

suit expressly or impliedly forbids the relief which is sought.”

The FEC and the DNC have failed to take any action into the investigation of

Obama, his fraudulent campaigning scheme which he has obtained over $400 Million

Dollars, knowing he is not a U.S. Citizen.

   

 

2. Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to

 

 

 

 

FEC v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998)

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack there of and has requested investigation into the eligibility

status of Obama. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the complaints and

requests.

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to

 

 

 

 

FEC v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998)

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack there of and has requested investigation into the eligibility

status of Obama. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the complaints and

requests.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack there of and has requested investigation into the eligibility

status of Obama. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the complaints and

requests.

 

 

 

 

 

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack there of and has requested investigation into the eligibility

status of Obama. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the complaints and

requests.

 

 

 

 

 

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack there of and has requested investigation into the eligibility

status of Obama. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the complaints and

requests.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 United States Code §702

 

 

 

 

 

states:

“A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected

or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled to

judicial review thereof. An action in a court of the United States seeking relief other than

money damages and stating a claim that an agency or an officer or employee thereof

acted or failed to act in an official capacity or under color of legal authority shall not be

dismissed nor relief therein be denied on the ground that it is against the United States or

that the United States is an indispensable party. The United States may be named as a

defendant in any such action, and a judgment or decree may be entered against the United

States: Provided, that any mandatory or injunctive decree shall specify the Federal officer

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 17 of 35

or officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for

compliance. Nothing herein

(1) “affects other limitations on judicial review or the power or duty of the

court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or

equitable ground; or

(2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants consent to

suit expressly or impliedly forbids the relief which is sought.”

The FEC and the DNC have failed to take any action into the investigation of

Obama, his fraudulent campaigning scheme which he has obtained over $400 Million

Dollars, knowing he is not a U.S. Citizen.

   

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 17 of 35

or officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for

compliance. Nothing herein

(1) “affects other limitations on judicial review or the power or duty of the

court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or

equitable ground; or

(2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants consent to

suit expressly or impliedly forbids the relief which is sought.”

The FEC and the DNC have failed to take any action into the investigation of

Obama, his fraudulent campaigning scheme which he has obtained over $400 Million

Dollars, knowing he is not a U.S. Citizen.

   

 

 

or officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for

compliance. Nothing herein

(1) “affects other limitations on judicial review or the power or duty of the

court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or

equitable ground; or

(2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants consent to

suit expressly or impliedly forbids the relief which is sought.”

The FEC and the DNC have failed to take any action into the investigation of

Obama, his fraudulent campaigning scheme which he has obtained over $400 Million

Dollars, knowing he is not a U.S. Citizen.

   

 

2. Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to

 

 

 

 

FEC v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998)

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack there of and has requested investigation into the eligibility

status of Obama. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the complaints and

requests.

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Plaintiff has Standing pursuant to

 

 

 

 

FEC v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11 (1998)

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack there of and has requested investigation into the eligibility

status of Obama. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the complaints and

requests.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack there of and has requested investigation into the eligibility

status of Obama. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the complaints and

requests.

 

 

 

 

 

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack there of and has requested investigation into the eligibility

status of Obama. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the complaints and

requests.

 

 

 

 

 

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack there of and has requested investigation into the eligibility

status of Obama. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the complaints and

requests.

 

 

 

 

 

Plaintiff has attempted to obtain the appropriate documents to prove Obama’s

citizenship status, or lack there of and has requested investigation into the eligibility

status of Obama. The DNC and the FEC have completely ignored the complaints and

requests.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 United States Code, §437c (b)

 

 

 

 

 

states:

(b) Administration, enforcement, and formulation of policy; exclusive

jurisdiction of civil enforcement; Congressional authorities or functions

with respect to elections for Federal office

(1) The Commission shall administer, seek to obtain compliance

with, and formulate policy with respect to, this Act and chapter

 

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

 

 

and chapter 96 of title 26

. The Commission shall have

exclusive jurisdiction with respect to the civil enforcement of

such provisions.

(2) Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit, restrict, or

diminish any investigatory, informational, oversight,

supervisory, or disciplinary authority or function of the

Congress or any committee of the Congress with respect to

elections for Federal office.

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 18 of 35

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 18 of 35

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 United States Code § 437d. Powers of Commission

 

 

 

 

 

states in pertinent part:

(a) Specific authorities

The Commission has the power—

(1) to require by special or general orders, any person to submit, under oath,

such written reports and answers to questions as the Commission may

prescribe;

( 3) to require by subpoena, signed by the chairman or the vice chairman, the

attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of all

documentary evidence relating to the execution of its duties;

(4) in any proceeding or investigation, to order testimony to be taken by

deposition before any person who is designated by the Commission and

has the power to administer oaths and, in such instances, to compel

testimony and the production of evidence in the same manner as

authorized under paragraph (3);

(9) to conduct investigations and hearings expeditiously, to encourage

voluntary compliance, and to report apparent violations to the appropriate

law enforcement authorities.

Plaintiff is a registered voter who has standing to seek Declaratory and Injunctive

Relief against the FEC, DNC and Obama pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §702. Plaintiff has a right,

which is secured to him by our laws and the United States Constitution, for verification

of our Presidential Nominee’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States prior

to the elections. Plaintiff as well as other Democratic individuals submitted complaints

to the DNC and the FEC, requesting verification of Obama’s citizenship status and

eligibility to serve as President of the United States. The FEC and DNC had a duty to

investigate Obama’s citizenship status, the fact Obama has refused to prove his eligibility

and obtained in excess of Four Hundred ($400) Million Dollars in Campaign Funds, is

based on a fraudulent scheme if Obama is unable to prove his “natural born” citizenship

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 19 of 35

   

status,

 

 

 

 

 

2 U.S.C. §437(g)

. The FEC is responsible for the administration, enforcement;

exclusive jurisdiction of civil enforcement; Congressional authorities or functions with

respect to elections for Federal office,

 

 

 

 

 

2 U.S.C. §437c(b)

. (emphasis added)

Defendants’ refusals to perform said inquiry and provide proof of our Democratic

Presidential candidate’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States is in

violation of the very laws stated for Plaintiff and other’s citizens of the United States.

Obama, knowing he is not an eligible candidate to serve as President of the United States,

began campaigning for the Presidential seat. Obama’s campaign has brought in over

Four Hundred ($400) Million Dollars in donations based on a fraudulent campaign,

which has been allowed by the Defendants, the FEC and DNC. Plaintiff and other

democratic citizens brought the issues to the attention of the DNC and the (FEC) who

have refused to take any action to protect Plaintiff and/or all other democratic citizens,

which is in violation of the United States Laws outlined above. Plaintiff has demanded

proof of Obama’s eligibility, however to no avail. The DNC and the FEC have a duty to

investigate the issue and disclose the information ensuring Obama is eligible to campaign

and serve as President of the United States, to Plaintiff and the public, who are being

harmed by the fraudulent conduct of Obama, a Presidential Candidate and the DNC’s

Nominee.

When Congress confers standing on litigants, the generalized grievance

constriction does not apply. Congress confers standing on any individual who has been

aggrieved by the denial of information required to be furnished pursuant to Statute. It

matters not that most people are or will be entitled and suffer a “generalized grievance”,

the statutory entitlement is sufficient.

 

 

 

 

 

FEC v. Akins

, 524 U.S. 11 (1998).

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 20 of 35

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 20 of 35

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FEC v. Akins

 

 

 

 

 

, 524 U.S. 11 (1998), held, in pertinent part

:

“1. Respondents, as voters seeking information to which they believe FECA

entitles them, have standing to challenge the FEC’s decision not to bring an

enforcement action. Pp. 6-14………

(b) Respondents also satisfy constitutional standing requirements. Their

inability to obtain information that, they claim, FECA requires AIPAC to make

public meets the genuine “injury in fact” requirement that helps assure that the

court will adjudicate “[a] concrete, living contest between adversaries.” Coleman

v. Miller,

 

 

 

 

 

307 U.S. 433, 460

(Frankfurter, J., dissenting). United States v.

 

Richardson,

 

 

 

 

 

418 U.S. 166

, distinguished. The fact that the harm at issue is widely

shared does not deprive Congress of constitutional power to authorize its

vindication in the federal courts where the harm is concrete. See Public Citizen v.

Department of Justice,

 

 

 

 

 

491 U.S. 440, 449

-450. The informational injury here,

directly related to voting, the most basic of political rights, is sufficiently

concrete. Respondents have also satisfied the remaining two constitutional

standing requirements: The harm asserted is “fairly traceable” to the FEC’s

decision not to issue its complaint and the courts in this case can “redress” that

injury. Pp. 8-14.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FEC v. Akins

 

 

 

 

 

, 524 U.S. 11 (1998), (Opinion. at p. 14) the Court stated:

“As commonly understood, the Federal Election Campaign Act seeks to remedy

any actual or perceived corruption of the political process in several important ways.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FEC v. Akins

 

 

 

 

 

, 524 U.S. 11 (1998), (Opinion. at p. 20) the Court stated:

“Given the language of the statute and the nature of the injury, we conclude that

Congress, intending to protect voters such as respondents from suffering the kind of

injury here at issue, intended to authorize this kind of suit. Consequently, respondents

satisfy “prudential” standing requirements. Cf. Raines v. Byrd, 521 U. S. ___, ___, n. 3

(1997)”

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 21 of 35

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 21 of 35

 

 

 

 

 

FEC v. Akins

 

 

 

 

 

, 524 U.S. 11 (1998), (Opinion. at p. 20) the Court stated:

“Given the language of the statute and the nature of the injury, we conclude that

Congress, intending to protect voters such as respondents from suffering the kind of

injury here at issue, intended to authorize this kind of suit. Consequently, respondents

satisfy “prudential” standing requirements. Cf. Raines v. Byrd, 521 U. S. ___, ___, n. 3

(1997)”

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 21 of 35

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 21 of 35

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FEC v. Akins

 

 

 

 

 

, 524 U.S. 11 (1998), (Opinion at p.21) the Court stated:

“Indeed, this Court has previously held that a plaintiff suffers an “injury in fact”

when the plaintiff fails to obtain information which must be publicly disclosed pursuant

to a statute. Public Citizen v. Department of Justice, 491 U.S. 440, 449 (1989) (failure to

obtain information subject to disclosure under Federal Advisory Committee Act

“constitutes a sufficiently distinct injury to provide standing to sue”). See also Havens

Realty Corp. v. Coleman,

 

 

 

 

 

455 U.S. 363, 373

-374 (1982) (deprivation of information

about housing availability constitutes “specific injury” permitting standing)”.

The United States Constitution Article VI states, “This Constitution, and the laws

of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or

which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of

the land……… The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of

the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United

States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this

Constitution.”

Furthermore, the Federal Elections Campaign Act [FECA] is supposed to protect

Plaintiff and other registered voters from the fraudulent schemes involved with Federal

Elections.

 

 

 

 

 

3. Plaintiff has Standing Pursuant to

 

 

 

 

8 U.S.C. §1481(b)

   

Further Standing is granted to Plaintiff under

 

 

 

 

 

8 U.S.C. §1481(b)

, which states:

“Whenever the loss of United States nationality is put in issue in any action or

proceeding commenced on or after September 26, 1961 under, or by virtue of, the

provisions of this chapter or any other Act, the burden shall be upon the person or

party claiming that such loss occurred, to establish such claim by a preponderance

of the evidence…….”

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 22 of 35

Plaintiff incorporates all previous pages as if fully set out herein. If in fact

Obama ever had any type of citizenship status in the United States, he lost said status

when his mother married Lolo Soetoro and became a citizen of Indonesia. In this case,

Obama, could have regained his U.S. citizenship status, if any were held, however, he

would have had to renounce his Indonesia citizenship, upon turning eighteen (18), which

is required by Indonesia to relinquish citizenship, and take the necessary actions to regain

any type of U.S. citizenship status, if any existed. Obama relinquished his United States

nationality by maintaining his naturalization in Indonesia, a foreign state, after the age of

eighteen (18) in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1481(a)(1), which is a voluntary expatriating act.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 22 of 35

Plaintiff incorporates all previous pages as if fully set out herein. If in fact

Obama ever had any type of citizenship status in the United States, he lost said status

when his mother married Lolo Soetoro and became a citizen of Indonesia. In this case,

Obama, could have regained his U.S. citizenship status, if any were held, however, he

would have had to renounce his Indonesia citizenship, upon turning eighteen (18), which

is required by Indonesia to relinquish citizenship, and take the necessary actions to regain

any type of U.S. citizenship status, if any existed. Obama relinquished his United States

nationality by maintaining his naturalization in Indonesia, a foreign state, after the age of

eighteen (18) in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1481(a)(1), which is a voluntary expatriating act.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plaintiff incorporates all previous pages as if fully set out herein. If in fact

Obama ever had any type of citizenship status in the United States, he lost said status

when his mother married Lolo Soetoro and became a citizen of Indonesia. In this case,

Obama, could have regained his U.S. citizenship status, if any were held, however, he

would have had to renounce his Indonesia citizenship, upon turning eighteen (18), which

is required by Indonesia to relinquish citizenship, and take the necessary actions to regain

any type of U.S. citizenship status, if any existed. Obama relinquished his United States

nationality by maintaining his naturalization in Indonesia, a foreign state, after the age of

eighteen (18) in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1481(a)(1), which is a voluntary expatriating act.

 

 

 

 

 

3. Plaintiff has Standing Pursuant to

 

 

 

 

8 U.S.C. §1481(b)

   

Further Standing is granted to Plaintiff under

 

 

 

 

 

8 U.S.C. §1481(b)

, which states:

“Whenever the loss of United States nationality is put in issue in any action or

proceeding commenced on or after September 26, 1961 under, or by virtue of, the

provisions of this chapter or any other Act, the burden shall be upon the person or

party claiming that such loss occurred, to establish such claim by a preponderance

of the evidence…….”

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 22 of 35

Plaintiff incorporates all previous pages as if fully set out herein. If in fact

Obama ever had any type of citizenship status in the United States, he lost said status

when his mother married Lolo Soetoro and became a citizen of Indonesia. In this case,

Obama, could have regained his U.S. citizenship status, if any were held, however, he

would have had to renounce his Indonesia citizenship, upon turning eighteen (18), which

is required by Indonesia to relinquish citizenship, and take the necessary actions to regain

any type of U.S. citizenship status, if any existed. Obama relinquished his United States

nationality by maintaining his naturalization in Indonesia, a foreign state, after the age of

eighteen (18) in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1481(a)(1), which is a voluntary expatriating act.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 22 of 35

Plaintiff incorporates all previous pages as if fully set out herein. If in fact

Obama ever had any type of citizenship status in the United States, he lost said status

when his mother married Lolo Soetoro and became a citizen of Indonesia. In this case,

Obama, could have regained his U.S. citizenship status, if any were held, however, he

would have had to renounce his Indonesia citizenship, upon turning eighteen (18), which

is required by Indonesia to relinquish citizenship, and take the necessary actions to regain

any type of U.S. citizenship status, if any existed. Obama relinquished his United States

nationality by maintaining his naturalization in Indonesia, a foreign state, after the age of

eighteen (18) in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1481(a)(1), which is a voluntary expatriating act.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plaintiff incorporates all previous pages as if fully set out herein. If in fact

Obama ever had any type of citizenship status in the United States, he lost said status

when his mother married Lolo Soetoro and became a citizen of Indonesia. In this case,

Obama, could have regained his U.S. citizenship status, if any were held, however, he

would have had to renounce his Indonesia citizenship, upon turning eighteen (18), which

is required by Indonesia to relinquish citizenship, and take the necessary actions to regain

any type of U.S. citizenship status, if any existed. Obama relinquished his United States

nationality by maintaining his naturalization in Indonesia, a foreign state, after the age of

eighteen (18) in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1481(a)(1), which is a voluntary expatriating act.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Again

 

 

 

 

 

, as previously stated, since Obama’s birth was legally Acknowledged by

Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen, and/or Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, which

the evidence attached hereto supports, Obama became an Indonesian citizen

 

 

 

 

 

and bears

the status as an Indonesia natural child (natural-born). For this reason, Obama would

have been required to file applications with the U.S. State Department and follow the

legal procedures to become a naturalized citizen in the United States, when he returned

from Indonesia. If Obama and/or his family failed to follow these procedures, then

Obama is an illegal alien.

Furthermore, Obama traveled to Indonesia and Pakistan in 1981 using his

Indonesian passport. Indonesian passports require renewal every five (5) years. At the

time of Obama’s travels, Obama was twenty (20) years old. If Obama was required to

give affirmation of allegiance to Indonesia to secure his Indonesian Passport or in

renewing, which is required every five (5) years, his Indonesian passport and/or

traveling on said passport, Obama was giving affirmation or reaffirmation of allegiance

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 23 of 35

to Indonesia in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1401(a)(1). Taking an oath or making an

affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state…after having

attained the age of eighteen years provides loss of nationality by native born citizens, 8

USC §1481(a)(2).

Since Obama was acknowledged by Lolo Soetoro as his son and/or was adopted

by Lolo Soetoro and was a citizen of Indonesia, according to his school record attached

as Exhibit “4”, Obama is clearly an Indonesian citizen.

   

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 23 of 35

to Indonesia in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1401(a)(1). Taking an oath or making an

affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state…after having

attained the age of eighteen years provides loss of nationality by native born citizens, 8

USC §1481(a)(2).

Since Obama was acknowledged by Lolo Soetoro as his son and/or was adopted

by Lolo Soetoro and was a citizen of Indonesia, according to his school record attached

as Exhibit “4”, Obama is clearly an Indonesian citizen.

   

 

 

to Indonesia in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1401(a)(1). Taking an oath or making an

affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state…after having

attained the age of eighteen years provides loss of nationality by native born citizens, 8

USC §1481(a)(2).

Since Obama was acknowledged by Lolo Soetoro as his son and/or was adopted

by Lolo Soetoro and was a citizen of Indonesia, according to his school record attached

as Exhibit “4”, Obama is clearly an Indonesian citizen.

   

 

4. Plaintiff has Standing under

 

 

 

 

5 U.S.C. §552

Plaintiff has standing to sue under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5

U.S.C. § 552 et seq. (1994). Anyone denied information under the Freedom of

Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq. (1994) has standing to sue regardless of

his or her reasons.

 

 

 

 

 

Akins, Et Al. vs.. FEC

, 322 US. App. D.C. 58; 101 F.3d 731; 1996

 

U.S. App. LEXIS 31253 (1996), 524 U.S. 11 (1998);

 

 

 

 

 

Public Citizen vs. FTC

, 276 U.S.

App. D.C. 222, 869 F.2d 1541(D.C. Cir. 1989).

Plaintiff has suffered an informational injury as a voter and member of the public;

the lack of information on Mr. Obama’s citizenship, caused by the FEC’s action, limited

the information available to him as a voter and impaired his ability to influence and

inform the public and policymakers. If a party is denied information that will help it in

making a voting decision that party is obviously injured in fact. In

 

 

 

 

 

Akins

, the court noted

that: “[a] voter deprived of useful information at the time he or she votes suffers a

particularized injury in some respects unique to him or herself just as a government

contractor, allegedly wrongfully deprived of information to be made available at the time

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 24 of 35

bids are due, would suffer a particularized injury even if all other bidders also suffered an

injury.” Even if all individuals who voted for any of the other Democratic candidates for

President, suffered the same injury that does not take away from the individual injury that

Plaintiff suffered.

5. Plaintiff has Standing Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1343, Civil rights and Elective

Franchise

28 U.S.C. § 1343. Civil rights and elective franchise states in pertinent part:

(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized

by law to be commenced by any person: ….

(3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute,

ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity

secured by the Constitution of the United States or by any Act of Congress

providing for equal rights of citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of

the United States;

(4) To recover damages or to secure equitable or other relief under any Act of

Congress providing for the protection of civil rights, including the right to vote.

Plaintiff has the right to secure equitable relief under 28 U.S.C. 1343(a)(3) and

(4).

 

 

 

 

 

In Baker v. Carr

, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), federal jurisdiction arose under this section and

Plaintiff had standing because his individual right to vote was affected. Like many other

United States citizens, Plaintiff lost the opportunity to vote in the general election for a

qualified Democratic candidate, because Obama withheld information critical to

determining his ineligibility for presidency, knowing he was not a “natural born” citizen

much less a citizen at all and knowing he was ineligible to serve as President of the

United States. Based on Obama’s fraud, people supported him instead of an eligible

candidate.

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 25 of 35

6. Plaintiff has Standing Pursuant to Federal Question Jurisdiction

   

Congress has conferred upon federal courts jurisdiction to decide

 

 

 

 

 

federal

 

 

 

questions

 

 

 

 

 

i.e., cases or controversies arising under the Constitution and laws of the

 

United States (

 

 

 

 

 

28 U.S.C. § 1331

)

 

Article III

 

 

 

 

 

permits federal question jurisdiction in every case in which the laws of

 

the United States are an “ingredient” of the suit in question.

 

 

 

 

 

Osborn v Bank of the United

 

 

 

States

 

 

 

 

 

, 22 US 738 (1824). Under Osborn’s reading of Article III

, federal question

jurisdiction can exist even if the federal ingredient never arises in the suit, or if it has

been already decided. “Congress may confer on the federal courts jurisdiction over every

case or controversy that might call for the application of federal law.”

 

 

 

 

 

Verlinden BV v

 

 

 

Central Bank of Nigeria

 

 

 

 

 

, 461 US 480 (1983).

The issues presented in Plaintiff’s complaint clearly arise under the Constitution

and Laws of the United States, and are a Federal Question presented.

There are no laws which specifically delegate whose responsibility it is to carry

the burden of verifying the eligibility of a President. The question is who has the

constitutional authority to resolve disputes regarding presidential candidates’ eligibility?

Our Constitution and laws are in fact, silent on how questions of presidential candidates’

eligibility are resolved. The Constitution or our laws do not contain provisions on who is

to make determinations of the compliance of the presidential candidate with Article II,

much less that they have exclusive ability to do so. The closest we have is 2 U.S.C.

§437c, if in fact illegal or fraudulent campaigning is involved.

Moreover, there are absolutely no statutes or laws which dictates how a person,

such as Plaintiff, are to demand proof of our Presidential candidates eligibility in order

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 26 of 35

for Plaintiff to be able to form a proper decision on who to cast his vote for. Each entity

contacted, whether Governmental or State has refused such duties, including the DNC

and FEC.

 

 

 

 

 

Again

, the closest we have is 2 U.S.C. §437c, if in fact illegal or fraudulent

campaigning is involved.

This is the first time in History these Federal questions have been presented.

There is not any statutory reference or case law pertaining to such questions.

The Constitution guarantees forms of redress through our Court systems. This

very Court has the inherent power to hear and resolve the Federal questions presented.

The Constitution of the United States of America is the supreme

 

 

 

 

 

law of the

United

 

States

 

 

 

 

 

. It provides the framework for the organization of the United States Government

.

For the aforementioned reasons, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Honorable

Court to deny Defendants Motion to Dismiss, Order immediate discovery, including but

not limited to: 1) A certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) Birth

Certificate; and (2) A certified copy of Obama’s Certificate of Citizenship; and (3) A

certified copy of the Oath of Allegiance taken by Obama after attaining the age of

majority and allow Plaintiff to amend his Complaint.

 

 

 

 

C. PLAINTIFF HAS PLED CAUSES OF ACTION WHERE RELIEF

CAN BE GRANTED.

Defendants claim Plaintiff has failed to state claim in which federal relief can be

granted. Plaintiff’s Complaint under Counts 1, 2 and 3 which clearly assert Obama was

born in Mombasa, Kenya and his mother was not old enough and did not meet the

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 27 of 35

residency requirements pursuant to The Nationality Act of 1940, revised June 1952 and

§301(a)(7) of the INA states the U.S. citizen parent, Obama’s mother, must have resided

in the U.S. for ten (10) years, five (5) of which were after the age of fourteen (14) in

order to give Obama “natural born” citizenship status in the United States.

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

 

 

of America v. Cervantes-Nava

 

 

 

 

 

, 281 F.3d 501 (2002), Drozd v. I.N.S.

, 155 F.3d 81, 85-88

(2d Cir.1998).

In order to determine Obama’s citizenship status, the Court must look to the

applicable law in effect at the time of Obama’s birth.

 

 

 

 

 

Runnett v. Shultz

, 901 F.2d 782,

783 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that “the applicable law for transmitting citizenship to a child

born abroad when one parent is a U.S. citizen is the statute that was in effect at the time

of the child’s birth”).

Additionally, Obama’s mother relocated Obama in or about 1967, when Obama

was approximately five (5) or six (6) years old, when she married Lolo Soetoro, an

Indonesian Citizen. At that time, Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship. Obama’s

mother became naturalized in Indonesia and Obama, being a minor, followed his

mother’s nationality, Nationality Act of 1940, Section 317(b).

As stated above, Obama admits in his book “

 

 

 

 

 

Dreams from my father

” Obama’s

memoir (autobiography) that after his mother and Lolo Soetoro were married, he and his

mother moved to Indonesia. Obama admits when he arrived in Indonesia he had already

been enrolled in school located in Jakarta prior to his arrival. The only way this could

have occurred, is if in fact Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian State citizen, acknowledged

Obama as his son, which acknowledgement was made prior to Obama’s eighteenth (18

 

 

 

 

 

th

)

birthday.

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 28 of 35

Under Indonesian law, when a male acknowledges a child as his son, it deems the

son, in this case Obama, as an Indonesian State citizen. Constitution of Republic of

Indonesia, Law No. 62 of 1958 Law No. 12 of 2006 dated 1 Aug. 2006 concerning

Citizenship of Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 9 of 1992 dated 31 Mar. 1992 concerning

Immigration Affairs and Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata)

(KUHPer) (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie). Republic of Indonesia Constitution

1945, a

 

 

 

 

 

s amended by the First Amendment of 1999, the Second Amendment of 2000, the

 

Third Amendment of 2001 and the Fourth Amendment of 2002,

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter X, Citizens and

 

Residents, Article 26 states

 

 

 

 

 

“(1) Citizens shall consist of indigenous Indonesian peoples

and persons of foreign origin who have been legalized [sic] as citizens in accordance

with law. (2) Residents shall consist of Indonesian citizens and foreign nationals living

in Indonesia

 

 

 

 

 

.”

Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges Obama was adopted by his

Indonesian stepfather. Obama was registered in a public school Fransickus Assisi School

in Jakarta, Indonesia under the name of Barry Soetoro, showing his citizenship as

Indonesian. The school registration is attached as

 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT “4”

. The law on the books

at that time did not allow foreign children to attend a public school in Jakarta. The

school obtained verification from the Government of the child’s name and citizenship

status.

Indonesia Constitution, Article 2 states “

 

 

 

 

 

It is stipulated that an adopted child has

the same status as a natural child and that his or her relationship to the birth parents is

severed by adoption

.

 

 

 

.

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 29 of 35

   

Indonesia Constitution,

 

 

 

 

 

Article 2 states: “on the condition of ratification of the

adoption by the District Court: “The law stipulates that children of mixed couples

automatically assume their father’s citizenship, and a divorced wife cannot take custody

of her children because they have different citizenship.”

Since Obama’s birth was legally Acknowledged by Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian

citizen, and/or Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, which the evidence attached hereto

supports, Obama became an Indonesian citizen

 

 

 

 

 

and bears the status as an Indonesia.

Dual citizenship was not allowed or permitted in Indonesia until the year 2006.

The Indonesian citizenship law was designed to prevent apatride (stateless) or bipatride

(dual citizenship). Indonesian regulations, at the time in question, did not recognize

neither apatride nor bipatride citizenship.

Indonesia did not allow Dual Citizenship or Dual Nationality; thus Obama is not a

U.S. Citizen, he is Indonesian. Neither Obama’s place of birth or the nationality of his

American parent are relevant, the Indonesian Law takes precedence under

 

 

 

 

 

The Master

 

 

 

Nationality Rule of Article 4 of the Hague Convention of 1930

 

 

 

 

 

.

The United States

 

accepts the existence of Dual Nationality only if the other country does.

 

 

 

 

 

Hague

 

 

 

Conventions

 

 

 

 

 

are applied by the United States and this has been in effect since before

1930. (Memorandum on Nationality, including Statelessness: Document A/CN.4/67,

prepared by Ivan S Kerno, International Law Commission, United Nations General

Assembly, 6th April 1953.) Thus, Obama is not a “natural born” citizen and my not even

be a naturalized citizen.

As a direct result of the Defendants actions, or lack thereof, Plaintiff’s civil rights

secured to him under the Fourteenth (14

 

 

 

 

 

th

) Amendment of the United States Constitution

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 30 of 35

have been affected. Plaintiff has been deprived, as stated above, money, time, billable

hours and Liberty and has suffered reverse discrimination and violations of the Freedom

of Information Act.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require notice pleading, not fact pleading,

so to withstand a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the Plaintiff “need only make out a claim upon

which relief can be granted. If more facts are necessary to resolve or clarify the disputed

issues, the parties may avail themselves of the civil discovery mechanisms under the

Federal Rules”.

 

 

 

 

 

Alston v. Parker

, 363 F. 3d 229, 233 n.6 (4d Cir. 2004), quoting

 

 

 

Swierkiewicz v. Sorema, N.A.

 

 

 

 

 

, 534 U.S. 506, 512 (2002) (“This simplified notice pleading

standard relies on liberal discovery rules…to define facts and issues and to dispose of

unmeritorious claims.”)

As this Court is aware, in deciding a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to

 

 

 

 

 

Federal Rules

 

 

 

of Civil Procedure

 

 

 

 

 

12(b)(6), the Court accepts the factual allegations of the Complaint as

 

true and draws all reasonable inferences therefore in favor of the Plaintiff.

 

 

 

 

 

Armstrong

 

 

 

Surgical Center, Inc. v. Armstrong County Memorial Hospital

 

 

 

 

 

, 185 F.3d 154, 155 (3d

 

Cir. 1999),

 

 

 

 

 

Morse v. Lower Merion School District

, 132 F.3d 902, 906 (4d Cir. 1997).

In making a determination, the Court must construe the pleading in the light most

favorable to the non-moving party.

 

 

 

 

 

Budinsky v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental

 

 

 

Resources

 

 

 

 

 

, 819 F.2d 418, 421 (3d Cir. 1987).

Plaintiff brought this action prior to the Democratic National Committee in

attempts to have Obama removed from the ballot if he was found to be ineligible.

Unfortunately, Obama was nominated as the Democratic Nominee to run and serve for

the President of the United States. The relief sought in all three (3) Counts of Plaintiff’s

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 31 of 35

complaint request a Declaratory relief deeming Obama ineligible to serve as President of

the United States as he is not a “natural born” citizen pursuant to the United States

Constitution, Article II, Section I and Injunctive Relief removing Obama from the ballot

and stopping all of his campaign efforts to secure the Office of the Presidency.

For the aforementioned reasons, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Honorable

Court to deny Defendants Motion to Dismiss, order immediate discovery, including but

not limited to: 1) a certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long version) Birth

Certificate; and (2) a certified copy of Obama’s Certificate of Citizenship; and (3) a

certified copy of the Oath of Allegiance taken by Obama taken at the age of majority and

allow Plaintiff to amend his Complaint.

D. CONCLUSION

Plaintiff served discovery in way of Admissions and Request for Production of

Documents, on Defendants on September 15, 2008 and has attempted to obtain

verification of Obama’s eligibility through Subpoenas to the Government entities and the

Hospital’s in Hawaii. To date, Plaintiff has not received the requested discovery from

the Defendants and two (2) of the locations, which subpoenas were served upon, refused

to honor the subpoena.

For the above aforementioned reasons, Plaintiff respectfully request Defendants

Barack Hussein Obama and the Democratic National Committee’s Motion to Dismiss

pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) be denied and order immediate discovery,

including but not limited to: 1) a certified copy of Obama’s “vault” (original long

version) Birth Certificate; and (2) a certified copy of Obama’s Certificate of Citizenship;

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 32 of 35

and (3) a certified copy of the Oath of Allegiance taken by Obama taken at the age of

majority. If the Court is inclined to grant Defendants motion, Plaintiff respectfully

requests the opportunity to amend his Complaint pursuant to the findings of this

Honorable Court.

Respectfully submitted,

/s Philip J. Berg

Dated: September 29, 2008 ___________________________

Philip J. Berg, Esquire

Attorney in pro se

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

(610) 825-3134

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 33 of 35

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Philip J. Berg, Esquire, hereby certify that Plaintiff’s Opposition and Brief in

Support thereof, to Defendants Barack Hussein Obama and the Democratic National

Committee’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant to

 

 

 

 

 

Federal Rules of Civil

 

 

 

Procedure

 

 

 

 

 

, Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) was served via electronic filing on the ECF

 

System, this 29 day of September

 

 

 

 

 

th

2008 upon the following:

John P. Lavelle, Jr., Esquire

Attorney I.D. PA 54279

 

 

 

 

BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS &

INGERSOLL, LLP

1735 Market Street, 51st Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 864-8603

(215) 864-9125 (Fax)

lavellej@ballardspahr.com

Joseph E. Sandler, Esquire

SANDLER REIFF & YOUNG PC

300 M Street, S.E. Suite 1102

Washington, D.C. 20003

Telephone: (202) 479-1111

Fax: (202) 479-1115

sandler@sandlerreiff.com

Robert F. Bauer, Esquire

General Counsel, Obama for America

PERKINS COIE

607 Fourteenth Street N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20005-2003

Telephone: (202) 628-6600

Facsimile: (202) 434-1690 Attorney’s for Defendant’s

   

RBauer@perkinscoie.com

 

 

 

 

 

Barack Hussein Obama and

The Democratic National Committee

 

 

 

 

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 34 of 35

The Federal Election Commission (FEC)

999 E. Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20463 In pro se

Served via regular mail postage fully prepaid

/s Philip J. Berg

Dated: September 29, 2008 ___________________________

Philip J. Berg, Esquire

Attorney in pro se

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

(610) 825-3134

Case 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Document 13 Filed 09/29/2008 Page 35 of 35
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

, Indonesian Constitution, Article 2.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Philip J Berg response, September 29, 2008, Obama motion to dismiss, Federal judge, Judge ruling, Constitution upheld?

Philip J Berg will respond to the federal judge today, Monday, September 29, 2008 regarding the Obama motion to dismiss the lawsuit. Instead of proving that he is a US citizen and qualified to be president, Obama filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit from Mr. Berg that states Obama is not qualified to be president. John McCain presented a vault COLB to congress. Why doesn’t Obama present a vault COLB? Because he does not have one and was born in Kenya.

As soon as Mr. Berg’s response is filed, we will provide an update.

To view the timeline of the Philip J Berg lawsuit and learn more about it, click on the link at the top of the Citizen Wells blog.

Philip J Berg’s website:

http://obamacrimes.com

How you can help Philip J Berg with the lawsuit:

“In case you haven’t noticed, this lawsuit is being ignored by the political parties, the candidates, and the media.

We hope you agree with us that Berg v. Obama is an important lawsuit which must be resolved to ensure the integrity of our democracy, constitution, and elections.

As a result, we would like to request that you:

  • Phone in to radio and tv call-in shows. Mention the lawsuit and point out that it is important that the public be made aware of Berg v. Obama and the status of the lawsuit.
  • Contact the ombudsmen, tip-lines, and action reporters of your local newspapers and radio / tv stations. Ask them why they are not reporting on this lawsuit.
  • Post blog entries on popular blogs, especially the blogs of national radio and tv networks and major newspapers.
  • Encourage your freinds and associates to take the above actions. 
  • Write letters to the editors of your local newspapers.
  • Print the info sheet and distribute it.

The point of this is to make the public aware of the lawsuit, not to put pressure on the parties to the lawsuit or to affect the outcome.

Some of the talking points you might use are:

  • The constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to be elected president is questionable.
  • We could have a major constitutional crisis if the lawsuit is not resolved quickly.
  • If the lawsuit goes against Senator Obama, it is important that the Democrats have the opportunity to nominate another candidate for president early enough that the new nominee will have a fair chance to compete in the election.
  • Our country will be thrown into turmoil if Senator Obama is elected and then determined to be ineligible to serve as president.
  • Review the info sheet for additional talking points 

Don’t forget that we can also use financial contributions to sustain this effort. Please click the “Donate” button at the upper left of this window.

Thank you for your time and effort in supporting the resolution of Berg v. Obama in a timely fashion.”

Here is another way you can help stop Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Obama, Rezko, Obama indictment, Philip J Berg lawsuit, Obama Kenyan, Obama not qualified, Vault COLB, Blagojevich, Corruption, Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama, Bar Application, Constitutional crisis, Obama will be removed

What will bring down Barack Obama and when will it happen?

Barack Obama, the candidate that was not vetted by the DNC, the
candidate that gained the nomination of the Democrat Party by
voter fraud, a free ride from the MSM, Obama thugs attacking those questioning him and by Nancy Pelosi ramroding him through the convention, will be taken down by his past. If Obama is not removed before or after the election, we will know that the powers controlling him have disabled the checks and balances that were designed to prevent this type of “manchurian candidate” from being elected.

I have never seen this level of corruption and unamerican activity
in a presidential election in my lifetime. In the past, this was read
about happening only in unstable countries outside the US.

How is it that a candidate that refuses to prove US citizenship, is
connected in so many long time ties to Tony Rezko and other Chicago and Illinois crime and corruption figures and even has a wife tied to Chicago corruption, is still running for president. How is it that a candidate tied to the middle east, Kenyan thugs and terrorists such as William Ayers, is still running for president. How is it that a candidate that lied on a Illinois Bar Application is still running for president. How is it that a candidate known to have used drugs and still using drugs is running for president.

We no longer have the press to protect us. Will Congress or the Judicial Branch do their job? Which of the following, documented, fact based issues will remove Barack Obama and when will it occur. Will we suffer a constitutional crisis as Philp J Berg has warned?

  • Philip J Berg filed a lawsuit in Federal Court on August 21, 2008
    stating that Obama is not qualified to be president. Berg states, and I agree, that Obama was born in Kenya. Obama filed a motion recently to dismiss the lawsuit. Why did Obama not produce a vault COLB? The answer is he was born in Kenya. John McCain presented a vault COLB to congress. Mr. Berg will respond on Monday, September 29, 2008 to the presiding judge.
  • The judge could rule that Obama has to produce a vault COLB and/or a pledge of allegiance to the US.
  • Mr. Berg is prepared to take the case to the US Supreme Court.
  • Tony Rezko, Stuart Levine and Dr. Robert Weinstein have all been indicted in the Rezko corruption “pay for play” scandal. Rezko has been convicted and is awaiting sentencing. Rezko has been talking and it is believed that Governor Blagojevich will be indicted soon. Obama endorsed Blagojevich when he ran for office. Obama is tied to Rezko, Levine, Weinstein and Blagojevich. Barack Obama may be indicted soon.
  • There is a Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama. The petition is gaining numbers as more and more people find out about the real Obama.
  • Remember Al capone? The feds tried for years to convict him on corruption and racketeering. They finally nailed him on tax evasion. Well, Mr. Obama may experience something similar. Obama lied on his Illinois Bar Application. Obama had 17 unpaid traffic violations and did not list any aliases.  Andy Martin filed a complaint on March 13, 2007 with the Illinois Board of Admissions to the Bar, but found out that Obama had relinquished his law license. According to Mr. Martin “They can’t punish someone who has resigned, which is why so many corrupt lawyers in Illinois resign before they are disbarred.” This would qualify for expulsion from the senate.
     
  • There is no proof that Obama complied with Selective Service Laws.

So, is the system going to work. We already know the MSM and the Democrat Party have failed us. Will our system of checks and balances work? If not, God help us.

The Citizen Wells blog has covered Obama from A to Z. You can read about Obama’s connections to Tony Rezko and other dubious connections. The timeline of the Philip J Berg lawsuit can be found at the top.

Here is a video that will shed more light on Barack and Michelle’s
ties to corruption:

Tony Rezko is talking. Here is an article that will bring you up to date
on what may happen next:

http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/2008/09/28/rezkotrialwatch-rezko-can-sing-2/#comment-3209

Here is the Petition to Impeach, expel Senator Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

 

A PETITION
                                     for
The Impeachment of Senator Barack Obama
      TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama is an admitted illegal drug user and
is believed to have used illegal drugs as recently as November 1999
or more recently. Mr. Obama has maintained contact with other
admitted illegal drug users.

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama has maintained regular contact
with known criminals such as Antoin (Tony) Rezko and other
criminal elements in Chicago and Illinois. Mr. Obama has
conducted business with these criminals and received campaign
donations from them. Mr. Obama was compelled to return an estimated $250,000 in
donations related to Tony Rezko.

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama has consistently lied about his
contact with convicted criminal Tony Rezko. The Tony Rezko
corruption trial revealed that FBI mole John Thomas helped investigators
“build a record of repeat visits to the old offices of Rezko and former
business partner Daniel Mahru’s Rezmar Corp., at 853 N. Elston, by
Blagojevich and Obama during 2004 and 2005,” according to the February
10, 2008 Chicago Sun-Times.

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama has engaged in unscrupulous business
practices, in particular with Mr. Robert Blackwell. Mr. Obama
received an $ 8,000 per month “legal retainer” from Mr. Blackwell
for a total of $112,000 and reported the income through his law firm
in a manner not unlike money laundering. Obama, along with Obama
campaign manager Dan Shomon, procured $ 320,000 in state grants
for Blackwell’s company Killerspin. Blackwell companies contributed
over $ 32,000 to the Obama campaign in 2007.

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama used the office of IL Senator to
facilitate the vote rigging in Chicago as chairman of the Illinois Senate
Health and Human Services Committee. Mr. Obama pushed legislation in Senate Bill
1332 to reduce the number of members of the Health Facilities Planning Board
from 15 to 9. Mr. Obama did conspire with Stuart Levine, Tony Rezko and
Rod Blogojevich to rig the committee and was rewarded with campaign
contributions. The new members appointed included 3 doctors who contributed to
Mr. Obama. On April 21, 2004, Stuart Levine explicitly advised Dr. Robert Weinstein,
who is now indicted, of Tony Rezko’s role in manipulating the Planning Board’s vote.

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama has engaged in lies and deception
about his past. Mr. Obama lied about his contact level with
convicted criminal Tony Rezko, the amounts and sources of
campaign contributions and encounters with the law. A complaint
has been filed with the Bar Association of Illinois alleging
that Mr. Obama did not answer truthfully all questions on the
application to the bar.

Whereas: Senator Barack Obama has invoked the FOIA in Illinois
when it was politically expedient and ignored or violated the
FOIA at other times. In the Illinois Senate proceedings of
Mr. Obama, in Senate Bill 1416, pleads the importance of businesses
bidding on state contracts having improved access to FOIA data. When
later questioned about his records during his term in the IL
Senate, Mr. Obama gave evasive answers or refused to supply records.

Whereas: The First Amendment provides a right for the people “to
petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Precedents
exist for impeachment and expulsion of a US Senator. Senator William
Blount was impeached by the House on July 7, 1797 and expelled by
the Senate the next day.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that we, the People, Undersigned,
being citizens of the United States and residents in the Cities and States so
indicated, HEREBY Demand that the Congress of the United States begin
immediate impeachment and/or expulsion proceedings against Senator
Barack Obama.

      Addendum: Petition to Impeach Senator Obama

We were urged to add the following information about Senator Obama.
This comes under the topic of lies and deception but also falls under more
serious charges of abuse of power and possible violation of the Logan Act.
Those signing the petition prior to this addendum will be identified.

August 4, 2008

Whereas: As a US Senator, Barack Obama violated the stated intention of
his 2006 Official Government Visa to Africa by publicly propagandizing
for his cousin, Railla Odinga against the US democratic ally of Kenya.
Whereas the stated “mission” of Senator Obama’s Official Visa, according
to the Kenya Office of Public Communications, was to “nurture relations
between the Continent and the United States” he, instead, made public
protest before Kenya citizens to rally against their leadership,
invoking a need for “Change!” and accusing this US allied nation of
“corruption.” In Official Protest of Mr. Obama’s passport abuse and
misconduct, Kenya’s government cited his “extremely disturbing
statements on issues which it is clear, he was very poorly informed, and
on which he chose to lecture the Government and the people of Kenya on
how to manage our country.” Whereas, furthermore, there is no public
record of any sanctions or reprimand by the US Congress of Senator
Obama’s passport violation or campaigning on foreign soil against a US
ally, history has since recorded the broadspread destruction of Kenya’s
economy and large scale loss of life as a result of the violence
instigated by Odinga’s ODM campaign there.

 

Obama, Fannie Mae, Family, CBC, 2005 speech, CEO explains relationships, Campaign contributions, Obama number two recipient, Franklin Raines, YouTube video, Obama and Democrat friends created problems, Explosive video

This Youtube video, recommended by Jenniejo, a regular commenter on this blog and concerned citizen, speaks for itself:
“Explosive CEO calling Obama and Dems the “Family” “Conscience” of Fannie Mae

The Banking Failures are because of the Housing Crisis, which was caused by mortgage lenders handing out bad loans and the biggest offenders: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

The Democrats have been taking PAYOFFS from Fannie and Freddie to look the other way FOR DECADES!

NOW VIDEO FOUND of the CEO of Fannie Mae in 2005 explaining the “FAMILY” connection with Democrats

And specifically Barack Obama and the Congressional Black Caucus”

Visit Philip J Berg’s site and contribute to the lawsuit:

http://obamacrimes.com

Stop the criminals:

http://obamaimpeachment.org