Monthly Archives: February 2021

Tagged "Dissenting Opinion of Justice Clarence Thomas validates and confirms", Justices concerns, Lin Wood comments on Wood v Raffensperger before and after SCOTUS denial

3 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorney General, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, US Constitution, Voter fraud, voters

Arizona 2020 election update Feb 23, 2021 Senator Borrelli interview Paul Boyer close friends with Maricopa Board, Evidence on the machines still there?, Ward v Jackson denied

Posted on February 23, 2021 | 3 comments

Arizona 2020 election update Feb 23, 2021 Senator Borrelli interview Paul Boyer close friends with Maricopa Board, Evidence on the machines still there?, Ward v Jackson denied

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

“The Arizona Legislature should immediately march in to Maricopa County, secure the ballots, and with the aid of appropriate law enforcement, arrest anyone obstructing justice.”...Citizen Wells

The people of Arizona and some of the legislators really care about how the 2020 election was conducted.

It is the opinion of Citizen Wells that the legislature is long on talk and shorter on action.

The plenary power of the Arizona legislature is absolute and exceeds that of any court.

Arizona State Senator Sonny Borrelli interview

Three things stand out:

Concerns about evidence tampering.
Republican Senator Paul Boyer is good friends with the Maricopa Board of Supervisors and wants to protect them.
The senate is requesting a Grand Jury Investigation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8a-T5FsfD0&t=96s

Arizona GOP chairman stated that the Dominion machines had been recalibrated.

Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson, et al. was denied by SCOTUS February 22, 2021

No. 20-809

Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson, et al.

from the Supreme Court of Arizona

Petition for a writ of certiorari denied.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Due process requires at a minimum the “orderly judicial review of any disputed matters that might arise” in an election. Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 110
(2000). In this case, the lower courts allowed only two full days of inspection and discovery into the validity of the presidential election in Arizona, in which threemillion, three hundred thirty-three thousand, eight hundred twenty-nine
(3,333,829) ballots were cast. The lower court held an “accelerated evidentiary
hearing” due to what it perceived as deadlines in the Electoral Count Act, “[i]n order to permit this matter to be heard and appealed (if necessary) to the Arizona Supreme Court before the Electoral College meets on December 14, 2020.” (Exhibit “A,” Judgment.) As the Court stated to undersigned counsel at the initial hearing Nov. 30th hearing: “You may be right on the law, that we’ve got more time than I think we have, but I’m reluctant to take that chance. And certainly if I set an evidentiary hearing after the 14th of December, I would expect someone to special action me to the Supreme Court and have the Supreme Court tell me, no, we have to do it sooner. But by then they don’t move as quickly as we do and we’ve lost a few days. And so my inclination is to set it on Thursday [December 3rd]….” (See Appendix “F,” transcript of initial Nov. 30th hearing, p. 14, lines 16-23.) As a result, even a very limited inspection of twenty-five hundred ballots that was granted by the Court (and/or stipulated to by the parties) simply could not be finished in time for trial, and Petitioner’s requests for larger inspections (as detailed below) were denied. ”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-809.html

Arizona Senate passed Senate Bill 1408

“The Arizona state Senate passed Senate Bill 1408 on a party-line 16-14 vote Thursday, giving the legislature the express authority to subpoena ballots, election equipment and information from counties. It also explicitly states that the legislature has the authority to investigate any matter.

The bill, sponsored by Sen. Warren Petersen, R-Gilbert, was passed in the event that a judge ruled that the law doesn’t give the legislature the authority to subpoena ballots and tabulation machines from Maricopa County so it can conduct an audit of the November 2020 election.”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/19/arizona-senate-passed-senate-bill-1408-subpoena-bill-feb-19-2021-legislature-has-the-authority-to-investigate-any-matter/

Az Canvassers are going door to door, documenting illegal voters. Listen to this canvasser’s story.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCGfttONS8E

Arizona SOS Katie Hobbs and Gov Ducey celebrate as they prematurely certify the votes while the Nov 30 election hearing was taking place.

More here:

Tagged 2021 Senator Borrelli interview Paul Boyer close friends with Maricopa Board, Arizona 2020 election update Feb 23, Evidence on the machines still there?, Ward v Jackson denied

3 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Windham Incident: NH Senate voted 24 to 0 to perform audit due to Dominion voting machine scandal, House takes up this week, Town Hall meeting Feb 22

Posted on February 22, 2021 | 6 comments

Windham Incident: NH Senate voted 24 to 0 to perform audit due to Dominion voting machine scandal, House takes up this week, Town Hall meeting Feb 22

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident: Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

From Granite Grok

“The “Windham Incident” Selectman’s Meeting – Monday, Feb. 22 at 7p”

“Last week, the Senate passed an amendment to Senate Bill SB43 that was championed by Senator Bob Giuda. The amendment replaced the entire text of SB43 with language that would FORCE the state to perform an audit on the Windham State Rep race on November 3, 2020.

It passed 24-0. Let that sink in! 24-0! That is quite a statement that reflects our desire to have accurate elections. The House will pick up the baton this week – and I’m hopeful that it flies through.

The Windham Board of Selectmen have been on board requesting an investigation regarding what the heck happened since the beginning of the debacle – and tomorrow they have an agenda item to discuss the situation further.

You can attend in person at Windham Town Hall, 3 North Lowell Rd, Windham 03087, or you can attend via Zoom (details below).

Town of Windham is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.

Topic: Board of Selectman Virtual Meeting

Time: Feb 22, 2021 07:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada)

Join Zoom Meeting”

https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/2021/02/the-windham-incident-selectmans-meeting-monday-feb-22-at-7p

More here:

Tagged House takes up this week, Town Hall meeting Feb 22, Windham Incident: NH Senate voted 24 to 0 to perform audit due to Dominion voting machine scandal

6 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Crime, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Alito Gorsuch dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid SOS, Feb 22, 2021, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied, Amicus briefs accepted

Posted on February 22, 2021 | 1 comment

Alito Gorsuch dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid
SOS, Feb 22, 2021, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied, Amicus briefs accepted

“Between these alternatives there is no middle ground. The constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.”
“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.

So if a law be in opposition to the constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution; or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty.

If then the courts are to regard the constitution; and the constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature; the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.”
“The judicial power of the United States is extended to all cases arising under the constitution. Could it be the intention of those who gave this power, to say that, in using it, the constitution should not be looked into? That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises? This is too extravagant to be maintained.”
“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?”…Marbury V Madison

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

From the US Supreme Court in

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
20–542 v.
VERONICA DEGRAFFENREID, ACTING SECRETARY
OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.

Alito Gorsuch DISSENTING OPINION

“JUSTICE ALITO, with whom JUSTICE GORSUCH joins,
dissenting from the denial of certiorari.
I agree with JUSTICE THOMAS that we should grant re-
view in these cases. They present an important and recur-
ring constitutional question: whether the Elections or Elec-
tors Clauses of the United States Constitution, Art. I, §4,
cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2, are violated when a state court holds
that a state constitutional provision overrides a state stat-
ute governing the manner in which a federal election is to
be conducted. That question has divided the lower courts,*
and our review at this time would be greatly beneficial.
In the cases now before us, a statute enacted by the Penn-
sylvania Legislature unequivocally requires that mailed
ballots be received by 8 p.m. on election day. Pa. Stat. Ann.,
Tit. 25, §§3146.6(c), 3150.16(c) (Purdon 2020). Neverthe-
less, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, citing a provision of
the State Constitution mandating that elections “be free
and equal,” Art. I, §5, altered that deadline and ordered that mailed ballots be counted if received up to three days
after the election, Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boock-
var, ___ Pa. ___, ___–___, 238 A. 3d 345, 362, 371–372
(2020). Both the state Republican and Democratic parties
urged us to grant review and decide this question before the
2020 election. See Application for Stay in Republican Party
of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar, No. 20A54, pp. 2–3; Demo-
cratic Party of Pennsylvania Response to Application for
Stay in No. 20A54, pp. 8–9. But the Court, by an evenly
divided vote, refused to do so. Nos. 20A53 and 20A54, ante,
p. ___ (THOMAS, ALITO, GORSUCH, and KAVANAUGH, JJ.,
noting dissents). That unfortunate decision virtually en-
sured that this important question could not be decided be-
fore the election. See No. 20–542, ante, p. ___ (statement of
ALITO, J., joined by THOMAS and GORSUCH, JJ.).
Now, the election is over, and there is no reason for refus-
ing to decide the important question that these cases pose.
“The provisions of the Federal Constitution conferring on
state legislatures, not state courts, the authority to make
rules governing federal elections would be meaningless if a
state court could override the rules adopted by the legisla-
ture simply by claiming that a state constitutional provi-
sion gave the courts the authority to make whatever rules
it thought appropriate for the conduct of a fair election.”
Ante, at 3; see also Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing
Bd., 531 U. S. 70, 76 (2000) (per curiam). A decision in
these cases would not have any implications regarding the
2020 election. (Because Pennsylvania election officials
were ordered to separate mailed ballots received after the
statutory deadline, see Republican Party of Pa. v. Boockvar,
No. 20A84, ante, p. ___, we know that the State Supreme
Court’s decision had no effect on the outcome of any election
for federal office in Pennsylvania.) But a decision would
provide invaluable guidance for future elections.”

“For these reasons, the cases now before us are not moot.
There is a “reasonable expectation” that the parties will
face the same question in the future, see Wisconsin Right to
Life, Inc., 551 U. S., at 463, and that the question will evade
future pre-election review, just as it did in these cases.
These cases call out for review, and I respectfully dissent
from the Court’s decision to deny certiorari.”

https://www.scribd.com/document/495533990/Supreme-Court-Refuses-Trump-Taxes-Case-2020-Election-Cases-Response#from_embed

More here:

Tagged 2021, Alito Gorsuch dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid SOS, Amicus briefs accepted, Feb 22, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied

1 Comment

Posted in Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Marbury V Madison, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice

Wood v Raffensperger Lin Wood Writ of Certiorari denied by SCOTUS Feb 22, 2021, Accusations against Chief Justice Roberts have any impact?

Posted on February 22, 2021 | 1 comment

Wood v Raffensperger Lin Wood Writ of Certiorari denied by SCOTUS Feb 22, 2021, Accusations against Chief Justice Roberts have any impact?

From the US Supreme Court February 22, 2021.

CERTIORARI DENIED

20-799 WOOD, L. LIN V. RAFFENSPERGER, BRAD, ET AL.

https://www.scribd.com/document/495533990/Supreme-Court-Refuses-Trump-Taxes-Case-2020-Election-Cases-Response#from_embed

From Citizen Wells February 19, 2021.

“Will Lin Wood’s accusations against Chief Justice Roberts have any impact?”

“From Lin Wood’s recent affidavit filed in US District Court:

“I have not received a retraction demand from Justice Roberts or his counsel and he has not made any claim to date that my posts are false and defamatory. Former Vice President Mike Pence or Rod Rosenstein have not sent retraction demands or claims that my posts of and concerning them are false and defamatory.””

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/19/wood-v-raffensperger-scheduled-for-scotus-conference-friday-feb-19-2021-todd-c-bank-amicus-filed-feb-18-how-will-wood-accusations-against-roberts-play-out/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMFy6_ubDLI&feature=emb_logo

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/19/wood-v-raffensperger-scheduled-for-scotus-conference-friday-feb-19-2021-todd-c-bank-amicus-filed-feb-18-how-will-wood-accusations-against-roberts-play-out/

1 Comment

Posted in Accountability, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, constitution, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Marbury V Madison, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice

Tagged 2021, Accusations against Chief Justice Roberts have any impact?, Wood v Raffensperger Lin Wood Writ of Certiorari denied by SCOTUS Feb 22

Justice Thomas dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid SOS, Feb 22, 2021, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied, Amicus briefs accepted

Posted on February 22, 2021 | 3 comments

Justice Thomas dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid
SOS, Feb 22, 2021, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied, Amicus briefs accepted

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

From the US Supreme Court in

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
20–542 v.
VERONICA DEGRAFFENREID, ACTING SECRETARY
OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.

Justice Thomas Dissenting Opinion

“The motions of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. for
leave to intervene as petitioner are dismissed as moot. The
motions of Thomas J. Randolph, et al. for leave to intervene
as respondents are dismissed as moot. The motion of Hon-
est Elections Project for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae
in No. 20–542 is granted. The motion of White House
Watch Fund, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in
No. 20–574 is granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari
are denied.
JUSTICE THOMAS, dissenting from the denial of certiorari.
The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority
to determine the “Manner” of federal elections. Art. I, §4,
cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2. Yet both before and after the 2020
election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it
upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we
received an unusually high number of petitions and emer-
gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions
here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legisla-
ture established an unambiguous deadline for receiving
mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day. Dissatisfied, the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots
received by the new deadline even if there was no evi-
dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed
by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to
have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any
federal election. But that may not be the case in the future.
These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address
just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec-
tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle.
The refusal to do so is inexplicable.”

“Because the judicial system is not well suited to address
these kinds of questions in the short time period available
immediately after an election, we ought to use available
cases outside that truncated context to address these ad-
mittedly important questions. Here, we have the oppor-tunity to do so almost two years before the next federal elec-
tion cycle. Our refusal to do so by hearing these cases is
befuddling. There is a clear split on an issue of such great
importance that both sides previously asked us to grant cer-
tiorari. And there is no dispute that the claim is sufficiently
meritorious to warrant review. By voting to grant emer-
gency relief in October, four Justices made clear that they
think petitioners are likely to prevail. Despite pressing for
review in October, respondents now ask us not to grant cer-
tiorari because they think the cases are moot. That argu-
ment fails.
The issue presented is capable of repetition, yet evades
review. This exception to mootness, which the Court rou-
tinely invokes in election cases, “applies where (1) the chal-
lenged action is in its duration too short to be fully litigated
prior to cessation or expiration, and (2) there is a reasonable
expectation that the same complaining party will be subject
to the same action again.” Davis v. Federal Election
Comm’n, 554 U. S. 724, 735 (2008) (internal quotation
marks omitted) (resolving a dispute from the 2006 election);
see also Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U. S. 780, 784, and
n. 3 (1983) (resolving a dispute from the 1980 election).
Here, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its decision
about six weeks before the election, leaving little time for
review in this Court. And there is a reasonable expectation
that these petitioners—the State Republican Party and leg-
islators—will again confront nonlegislative officials alter-
ing election rules. In fact, various petitions claim that no
fewer than four other decisions of the Pennsylvania Su-
preme Court implicate the same issue.3 Future cases will
arise as lower state courts apply those precedents to justify
intervening in elections and changing the rules.

One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to set-
tle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear
rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future
elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath
a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite
further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fel-
low citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respect-
fully dissent.”

https://www.scribd.com/document/495533990/Supreme-Court-Refuses-Trump-Taxes-Case-2020-Election-Cases-Response#from_embed

More here:

Tagged 2021, Amicus briefs accepted, Feb 22, Justice Thomas dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid SOS, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied

3 Comments

Posted in Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, constitution, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Marbury V Madison, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice

Hero Lenoke Arkansas police officer Cody Carpenter recovering well after receiving multiple shots saving NC teen Savannah Childress

Posted on February 22, 2021 | 2 comments

Hero Lenoke Arkansas police officer Cody Carpenter recovering well after receiving multiple shots saving NC teen Savannah Childress

“Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed.”…John 3:20

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”…Edmund Burke

“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”…Ephesians 6:12

From KNWA Fox News February 22, 2021.

“Arkansas State Police confirmed Sunday that a shooting that injured a Lonoke police officer Saturday night was connected to the recovery of an abducted teen from North Carolina and the suspect in the case has died.

Lonoke police say Officer Cody Carpenter was shot multiple times, but “is expected to make a full recovery and is in good spirits given the circumstances.”

Lonoke police say the 14-year-old victim has been returned to her family in North Carolina.”

“According to a news release from the Davidson County Sheriff’s Office, an investigation into the missing 14-year-old began on February 11. Davidson County deputies say it was discovered the teen was using her school-issued computer to communicate with a person, later identified as Ice, using multiple online platforms.

Investigators say Ice was also talking to several other girls in Alamance County, North Carolina.

According to the Davidson County Sheriff’s Office, investigators determined Ice took the 14-year-old girl from her home on February 11.

Carpenter lives in Lonoke and in addition to joining the Lonoke Police Department full-time in January, is a volunteer fireman with the Lonoke Fire Department and a National Guardsman at Camp Robinson.

Lonoke Police say Carpenter has multiple years of experience as a law enforcement officer.”

https://www.nwahomepage.com/news/ark-state-police-lonoke-police-officer-injured-in-shooting-during-recovery-of-abducted-n-c-teen-suspect-dead/

Thank God Officer Carpenter, an American hero, is ok.

More here:

Tagged Hero Lenoke Arkansas police officer Cody Carpenter recovering well after receiving multiple shots saving NC teen Savannah Childress

2 Comments

Posted in American hero, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Crime, Justice, Law enforcement, NC, North Carolina, police

NC teen Savannah Childress rescued by brave Arkansas State police in shootout, Officer wounded, Suspect wanted in child predator cases dead

Posted on February 22, 2021 | 2 comments

NC teen Savannah Childress rescued by brave Arkansas State police in shootout, Officer wounded, Suspect wanted in child predator cases dead

“Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed.”…John 3:20

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”…Edmund Burke

From the Hickory Daily Record February 21, 2021.

“14-year-old NC girl rescued after police shoot-out in Arkansas. Police officer wounded and suspect dead, authorities said

A 14-year-old girl reported missing from Davidson County was rescued after a shoot-out with officers in Arkansas that critically injured one of them, according to a news release from Arkansas State Police. The suspect, 38-year-old William Robert Ice of Jackson Center, Pennsylvania, later died at a hospital, apparently from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

The girl, whom police did not directly identify, fled from Ice’s vehicle after the shoot-out and was to be returned to North Carolina today.

An Amber Alert has been canceled for 14-year-old Savannah Childress and her mother, Nicole Childress, told WFMY-Channel 2 that Savannah was found safe in Arkansas. A release Sunday from the Davidson County Sheriff’s Office also indicated the child is Savannah Childress.

According to news releases from the Davidson County Sheriff’s Office and Arkansas State Police, the events Saturday unfolded as follows.

At about 8 p.m. Saturday, two Lonoke police officers recognized a Dodge Durango SUV parked at a McDonald’s restaurant near Interstate 40. It appeared to be a vehicle used in connection with a North Carolina child abduction case.

https://hickoryrecord.com/news/state-and-regional/14-year-old-nc-girl-rescued-after-police-shoot-out-in-arkansas-police-officer-wounded/article_85bb1a5f-5140-557a-ab91-2cd8e87bf49e.html

Thank God Savannah Childress is safe.

Thank God we have dedicated law enforcement folks.

More here:

Tagged NC teen Savannah Childress rescued by brave Arkansas State police in shootout, Officer wounded, Suspect wanted in child predator cases dead

2 Comments

Posted in American hero, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Crime, Evil, Family, Law enforcement, police

David K Clements law professor live on Youtube Dominion Voting Systems contracts, Watch live now

Posted on February 21, 2021 | 2 comments

David K Clements law professor live on Youtube Dominion Voting Systems contracts, Watch live now

First question was on Dominion Voting Systems contracts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7Ybw5Cv9tU

“Update on the BIG LIE: Law Professor Confirms Election Fraud Evidence Is “Significant” – Cases Only Dismissed on Process Grounds Not Merit”

“Law Professor Davide K. Clements released a rebuttal video recently refuting the BIG LIE, that there was no evidence of election fraud in the 2020 election.

As The Gateway Pundit has reported for months now the fraud was extensive and historic.”

“A business law professor at New Mexico State University (NMSU) said that anyone who proposes there “is no evidence” for massive election fraud in November’s presidential election doesn’t know what they are talking about.

Professor David K. Clements released a provocative video in response to a letter sent to the entire faculty of NMSU from Dr. John Floros, the university’s president. Clements described the letter as “regurgitating” the narrative “in the media” regarding the election and the January 6 violence at the U.S. Capital.

While broadly addressing many issues on these topics, he was very specific with regards to his own personal investigation into the election fraud question.

For those who believe “there is no evidence, you don’t know what you are talking about,” he said. “I’ve reviewed hours upon hours of public hearings. I have read almost all of the lawsuits that are out there. Most of them were dismissed on legal process grounds.”

These suits, he said, were dismissed due to a legal lack of standing. “The general argument” that was presented in these cases, he said, “was that because this was a general harm,” then “you have no standing because your harm has to be particular. It’s not because there isn’t evidence. There is evidence,” the professor emphasized.

“In fact, I’m in possession of 574 pages of sworn affidavits, forensic reports, all of which would make its way in a court of law under the rules of evidence in a federal or state court. The fact that the evidence has not been heard here by these courts” should not be conflated into “this idea that there is no evidence,” Clements argued.”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/01/24/no-2020-election-fraud-big-lie-destroyed-by-law-professor-davide-k-clements-im-in-possession-of-574-pages-of-sworn-affidavits-forensic-reports/

More here:

Tagged David K Clements law professor live on Youtube Dominion Voting Systems contracts, Watch live now

2 Comments

Posted in Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors

Gas price up Layoffs up Lies up, Democrats Rinos leftists installed corrupt Chi Comm Biden in White House, Imbeciles of America united

Posted on February 21, 2021 | 5 comments

Gas price up Layoffs up Lies up, Democrats Rinos leftists installed corrupt Chi Comm Biden in White House, Imbeciles of America united

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

“You may fool all the people some of the time, you can even fool some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all the time.”…Abraham Lincoln

“The imbeciles of America have united.”…Citizen Wells

Congratulations imbeciles.

Gas prices up!
Layoffs up!
Lies up!

Democrats, RINOS, Leftists and corrupt election officials joined forces to install corrupt Chi Comm Joe Biden in the White House.

Illegally.

In less than 2 months gas prices have skyrocketed locally 19 percent with no end in sight.

Pipeline layoffs have begun.

And lies from the Democrats, et al, already at all time highs are increasing.

A minimum wage of 15 % will cause more job losses.

Congratulations imbeciles, low and middle income people will be hit the hardest.

But you do not care.

The end justifies the means.

More here: