NOY Not on YouTube “fraud” occurs 89 times in 17 state Amicus in Texas case, “non-legislative actors” stripped away “critical safeguards against ballot fraud”

NOY Not on YouTube “fraud” occurs 89 times in 17 state Amicus in Texas case, “non-legislative actors” stripped away “critical safeguards against ballot fraud”

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

“”You’re a traitor!” yelled the boy. “You’re a thought criminal!””...George Orwell, “1984”

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

 

Straight out of “1984” by George Orwell, YouTube on December 9, 2020 announced:

“Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline for the U.S. Presidential election and enough states have certified their election results to determine a President-elect. Given that, we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, in line with our approach towards historical U.S. Presidential elections.”

In one paragraph YouTube:

  1. Told the big lie being repeated that we have a president elect. Per the US Constitution that happens at the earliest January 6, 2020. This is not only Orwellian but the methodology of Nazi Joseph Goebbels.
  2. Just like the book burning Nazis and Big Brother of “1984”, they restricted reporting of voter fraud.

Read more:

https://citizenwells.com/2020/12/10/youtube-thought-police-panicked-why-because-supreme-court-filings-loaded-with-fraud-we-also-disallow-content-alleging-widespread-fraud/

The YouTube Thought Police panicked.

They knew with the Supreme Court cases, a mountain of evidence, in legal documents of the highest order, presented to the highest court of the land, would address widespread voter fraud in the 2020 elections and dominate the news cycle if reported.

That would destroy their left wing strategy they present in their Top News category from the likes of CBS, CNN, et al.

One of the first legal briefs filed was:

BRIEF OF STATE OF MISSOURI AND
16 OTHER STATES AS AMICI CURIAE IN
SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT

Filed December 9, 2020.

The word “fraud” is used 89 times!

For example:

“II. Stripping Away Safeguards From Voting by
Mail Exacerbates the Risks of Fraud.
By stripping away critical safeguards against
ballot fraud in voting by mail, non-legislative actors in
the Defendant States inflicted another grave injury on
the conduct of the recent election: They enhanced the
risks of fraudulent voting by mail without authority.
An impressive body of public evidence demonstrates
that voting by mail presents unique opportunities for
fraud and abuse, and that statutory safeguards are
critical to reduce such risks of fraud.”

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163215/20201209144840609_2020-12-09%20-%20Texas%20v.%20Pennsylvania%20-%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20Missouri%20et%20al.%20-%20Final%20with%20Tables.pdf

NOY

Not on YouTube

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

5 responses to “NOY Not on YouTube “fraud” occurs 89 times in 17 state Amicus in Texas case, “non-legislative actors” stripped away “critical safeguards against ballot fraud”

  1. “For decades prior to 2020, responsible observers
    emphasized the risks of fraud in voting by mail, and
    the importance of imposing safeguards on the process
    of voting by mail to allay such risks. For example, in
    Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, this Court
    held that fraudulent voting “perpetrated using
    absentee ballots” demonstrates “that not only is the
    risk of voter fraud real but that it could affect the
    outcome of a close election.” Crawford v. Marion
    County Election Bd., 553 U.S. 181, 195-96 (2008)
    (opinion of Stevens, J.) (emphasis added). ”
    17 state Amicus

  2. CW,

    Just saw your BitChute vid; Short and concise. You really didn’t need to say anything else!

  3. Thanks Sue.
    There was a tech prob intially which they quickly fixed.
    It was a test.
    But mainly a in your face to YouTube.

  4. PS-I am busier than a one armed one legged well digger so video had to be short.

  5. Sometimes, you can get more out of a 30 second vid than you can from a 30 minute vid; it’s the content that counts, and this one made its point hard and fast. Loved it!

    Some of the political vids I watch on YouTube are no longer there. If you do a search for the author, vids from a month ago pop up. I don’t appreciate censorship…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s