Blagojevich trial corruption revealed, Witnesses not called, Evidence not presented
“Curiouser and curiouser”…Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll
From the last article at Citizen Wells article taken from the Chicago Tribune. Blagojevich attorney Sam Adam Jr. leaves the courtroom in protest.
“Adam announced to U.S. District Judge James Zagel that he wouldn’t follow the judge’s order barring him from arguing that the government didn’t call some key witnesses to point the finger at the former governor. Adam wants to be able to tell the jury that they weren’t called because they would have been helpful to Blagojevich.
Zagel threatened to hold him in contempt of court if he proceeded, and Adam said he would take that risk.
“I’m willing to go to jail for this, your honor,” Adam said loudly. “I cannot follow your order on this.”
Having that door closed makes it impossible for him to effectively represent Blagojevich, Adam said. He said he should be able to argue that the government could have called witnesses such as fundraiser Antoin “Tony” Rezko, political insider Stuart Levine and Blagojevich’s general counsel, William Quinlan.”
Is this part of some theatric scheme? A diversion on top of diversions? Bringing Tony Rezko and Stuart Levine to the stand does not help Blagojevich, but it does hurt Obama.
Part 6 of the series on protecting Obama and US Justice Department corruption will be presented today. It further reveals the amount of evidence withheld and how the trial was skewed to focus on events that happened in the latter half of 2008 to the exclusion of most of the corruption that Blagojevich and his cronies were involved in.
Citizen WElls 
CW,
You nailed it.
It would hurt Obama and not help to Blago. The prosecution could hurt Blago, but not without hurting Obama.
When Obama made that qiuck rush to Chicago and spoke with the Prosecutor, surely the game plan was laid out. Why else meet with him?
When was the last time a President of the United States flew out to the city where a presiding trial was taking place and personally speak with the prosecutor that he himself was involved in the scheme?
This should’ve been all over the news the entire time as well as Gibbs having his eyes drilled by the press on a daily basis.
The Great One, Mark Levine, wrote “The possibility of impeachment does not immunize the president from criminal prosecution. He remains, at all times, a citizen of the United States who is answerable to the law.”
Barrack Hussein Obama has spent over two million dollars (that we know about) on private lawyers to hide facts about his eligibility to be President; and he has illegally utilized Department of Justice lawyers to successfully avoid impeachment so far.
Another great legal scholar, Justice Antonin Scalia described the way our Founding Fathers provided to bring criminal politicians like BHO to justice: “Rooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history, the Grand Jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the three branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right…In fact, the whole theory of its (the Grand Jury) function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people.”
You see our Founding Fathers never intended for us to be lorded over by corrupt criminals in the White House and Congress. To the contrary, our Founding Fathers intended for We the People to have control over our Government and our politicians. That is one of the primary reasons that they bestowed upon us that extraordinary Bill of Rights which provided for the Grand Jury System controlled by the people not the politicians.
In our Founding Fathers’ prescient wisdom, they designed a Grand Jury System in which no man, not even the President of the United States, is above the Law.
For information on forming a Secret Grand Jury to investigate crimes go here:
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/06/how-to-start-and-lead-citizens-grand.html
http://dewdropwarriors.blogspot.com/2009_03_01_archive.html
http://grandjury.blogtownhall.com
For information on Crimes committed by the BHO campaign:
https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/category/nashville
“Part 6 of the series on protecting Obama and US Justice Department corruption will be presented today.”
CW,
U have pulled back the curtain on this theatrical charade of a “trial,”
previously
Aussie // July 26, 2010 at 9:56 pm
So who paid the judge to throw the case?
****************************************
Remember the judge is a writer. He will get a multi-million dollar book and movie deal too.
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/clout_st/2010/05/blagojevich-trial-judge-zagel-regarded-as-smart-unflappable.html
“Do you ever wonder what spins through a judge’s head while lawyers and witnesses drone on endlessly for days and weeks at trial?
In the case of U.S. District Judge James B. Zagel, who is scheduled to preside over the sweeping corruption trial of former Gov. Rod Blagojevich in a little more than two weeks, there’s a good chance those thoughts sometimes drift to grandly larcenous fantasies.
How else to explain “Money to Burn,” the well-received 2002 novel penned by Zagel about a federal judge who masterminds an audacious heist at the super-secure Federal Reserve Bank in Chicago?”
http://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/ward-room/Blago-Lawyers-File-Motion-Against-Judge-94918759.html
If U had just heard the judge say that UR lawyer failed to call witnesses “crucial to UR defense” and you had just heard UR lawyer threaten to walk out on your trial, would you cordially shake UR lawyer’s hand and exchange pleasantries before he walked out of the courtroom?
U would if he knew from day one an absolute jury fix was in?
CW
Would you give Jonah my e-mail address please?
**** New Post ****
We’ve already seen the response to the citizens grand jury, it’s the same as the right to petition for redress of grievances. Just words on an old piece of paper. The robed thieves have you perplexed but not out manned. Soon the time to decend on these institutions with demands will be the last resort.