We The People Foundation, WeThePeopleFoundation.org, Press conference, Monday, December 8, 2008, National Press Club, US Supreme Court, Donofrio vs Wells, Obama not eligible, Chicago Tribune, News

Today,  Monday, December 8, 2008, we should know if the US Supreme Court will consider for review the Donofrio versus Wells lawsuit. Also, the We The People Foundation will hold a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington regarding Obama’s eligibility to be president.

Note this from Leo Donofrio:


I will not be there and am not in any way associated with this event.

Please pass this information out to the blogosphere far and wide.   The event has nothing to do with me.”

Here is the We The People Foundation press conference notice on the National Press Club site followed by the press release:

Event Name: Obama’s Citizenship 
Event Date: Dec. 8, 2008
Event Type: News Conference 
Time: 1:30 PM 
Sponsored by: We the People Foundation 
Event Location: Murrow Room 
Details: Is Obama a Natural Born Citizen? 
Contact/Reservations: Bob Shultz









We The People Foundation

For Constitutional Education, Inc.


2458 Ridge Road, Queensbury, NY 12804

December 4, 2008 Contact:




Bob Schulz,





Queensbury, NY

– On Monday, December 8, 2008, at 1:30 pm,


– On Monday, December 8, 2008, at 1:30 pm,


the We The People

Foundation will conduct a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington D.C.

The licensed attorneys who initiated lawsuits in PA (Philip Berg), NJ (Leo Donofrio) and CA

(Orly Taitz), challenging Mr. Obama’s legal eligibility to hold the Office of President of the United

States, will briefly summarize the facts, legal arguments and status of their cases. They will

answer questions from the press.

Prior to the start of the conference, at 10 am, the Supreme Court of the United States is

expected to announce whether it will consider applications from these attorneys who have

asked the Court to delay the proceedings of the Electoral College pending a determination of

the underlying constitutional question – the meaning of the “natural born citizen” clause of

Article II of the Constitution and its application to Mr. Obama.

Robert Schulz will briefly discuss Mr. Obama’s response to the publication of his Open Letter in





Chicago Tribune

on Monday and Wednesday of this week. For the reasons given in the

Open Letter, Schulz asked Mr. Obama to: (1) immediately authorize Hawaiian officials to

provide a team of forensic scientists access to his original (“vault”) birth certificate and (2)

arrange for the delivery of other documents needed to conclusively establish Obama’s

citizenship status. Mr. Schulz will answer questions from the press.

“Under our Constitution, no one is eligible to assume the Office of the President unless he or

she is a ‘natural born citizen,’” said Bob Schulz, Chairman of the Foundation. “To date, Mr.

Obama has refused all requests to release his original birth certificate or other documents that

would definitively establish his citizenship status and thus his constitutional eligibility.”

The Open Letter to Mr. Obama summarizes the evidence against Mr. Obama and the adverse

consequences that would befall the Nation should he assume the Office of the President as a







– On Monday, December 8, 2008, at 1:30 pm,


11 responses to “We The People Foundation, WeThePeopleFoundation.org, Press conference, Monday, December 8, 2008, National Press Club, US Supreme Court, Donofrio vs Wells, Obama not eligible, Chicago Tribune, News

  1. Citizen– the following post excerpt came from one of your stories. Can you please site the link as to where it originated? I know you said it was from “Team Obama” but I reposted it on another link and inquiring minds want to know! By the way, keep up the great work! I will check back to this comment section for the link. Thanks!
    The Framers elected not to define “natural born citizen,” except by exempting themselves, which self exemption “could be due the fact that they were not born in the United States without regard to whether or not they had been subject to British jurisdiction,” and the Framers’ lack of concern about dual citizenship or loyalties is shown by their only requiring Presidents to have been residents in the United States for 14 years — meaning an eligible candidate born in the United States still could have resided under the jurisdiction of another country for 21 years or more; and even if the Framers WERE concerned about split loyalties, those were intended to be addressed on a “case by case basis” — and it would not be reasonable to conclude that Obama would have British loyalty since the British Citizenship conferred on him at birth was only “due to his biological relationship to an estranged and unfamiliar father.”

    Team Obama concludes that the Framer’s definition of “Natural Born Citizen” is the same as “Citizen” meaning all that is required is birth in the United States, even if neither parent is an American Citizen.


  2. Citizen –I think it was made to appear that Team Obama did in fact state this. However, it now looks as if Ted was giving his opinion and that it did not come from “Team Obama”, correct?

  3. I have no verification.

  4. Citizen, you are usually much better at posting stories that have been verified! I know you are under alot of stress right now, so all is forgiven! Please post photos as soon as you can from the press conference.

  5. This was not my post!!!
    It was a comment.
    I allow reasonable comments even if they are contrary to my position.

  6. MasterZorro2008

    The Supreme Court rejected Donofrio’s insane clamins:


    Obviously those radicals who don’t want Obama be president will continue their lawsuits. After all, lawyers are people too and they’re hurting in this economic recession. However, on December 15, the electors will give the presidency (officially) to Obama, and on January 20, we all will witness our new president raise his right hand and pronounce, in front of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court the oath of office: “I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear…”. Get used to it, it’s unstoppable.

  7. If that happens, two people sworn to uphold the US Constitution will be
    subject to impeachment.

  8. Where can I find coverage of the news conference.

  9. Good question.
    I just went to the National Press club blog site.
    I remember hearing from Shulz that Cspan may present it later in the day.
    If I find out, I will report.

  10. MasterZorro2008 —

    What do you know that WE don’t know?

    Can you really know who will say “I . . .” when Chief Justice Roberts says “Raise your right hand and repeat after me . . .”

    I think that hell will freeze over BEFORE Chief Justice Roberts administers the Inaugural Oath to someone, unless he KNOWS that they are eligible to serve. That means that after January 8, 2009, Barack Obama may have a whole lot of ‘splainin to do, if he really wants to be President of the United States.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s