Today, Monday, December 8, 2008, we should know if the US Supreme Court will consider for review the Donofrio versus Wells lawsuit. Also, the We The People Foundation will hold a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington regarding Obama’s eligibility to be president.
Note this from Leo Donofrio:
“ALL REPORTS STATING I WILL BE AT THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB ON MON DECEMBER 8, 2008 ARE FALSE.
I will not be there and am not in any way associated with this event.
Please pass this information out to the blogosphere far and wide. The event has nothing to do with me.”
Here is the We The People Foundation press conference notice on the National Press Club site followed by the press release:
| Event Name: | Obama’s Citizenship |
| Event Date: | Dec. 8, 2008 |
| Event Type: | News Conference |
| Time: | 1:30 PM |
| Sponsored by: | We the People Foundation |
| Event Location: | Murrow Room |
| Details: | Is Obama a Natural Born Citizen? |
| Contact/Reservations: | Bob Shultz 518-656-3578 bob@givemeliberty.org |
We The People Foundation
For Constitutional Education, Inc.
http://www.WeThePeopleFoundation.org
2458 Ridge Road, Queensbury, NY 12804
December 4, 2008 Contact:
Bob Schulz,
518-656-3578
info@GiveMeLiberty.org
Mr. OBAMA’s ELIGIBILITY TO BE AIRED MONDAY
AT THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB
Queensbury, NY
– On Monday, December 8, 2008, at 1:30 pm,
– On Monday, December 8, 2008, at 1:30 pm,
Foundation will conduct a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington D.C.
The licensed attorneys who initiated lawsuits in PA (Philip Berg), NJ (Leo Donofrio) and CA
(Orly Taitz), challenging Mr. Obama’s legal eligibility to hold the Office of President of the United
States, will briefly summarize the facts, legal arguments and status of their cases. They will
answer questions from the press.
Prior to the start of the conference, at 10 am, the Supreme Court of the United States is
expected to announce whether it will consider applications from these attorneys who have
asked the Court to delay the proceedings of the Electoral College pending a determination of
the underlying constitutional question – the meaning of the “natural born citizen” clause of
Article II of the Constitution and its application to Mr. Obama.
Robert Schulz will briefly discuss Mr. Obama’s response to the publication of his Open Letter in
the
Chicago Tribune
Open Letter, Schulz asked Mr. Obama to: (1) immediately authorize Hawaiian officials to
provide a team of forensic scientists access to his original (“vault”) birth certificate and (2)
arrange for the delivery of other documents needed to conclusively establish Obama’s
citizenship status. Mr. Schulz will answer questions from the press.
“Under our Constitution, no one is eligible to assume the Office of the President unless he or
she is a ‘natural born citizen,’” said Bob Schulz, Chairman of the Foundation. “To date, Mr.
Obama has refused all requests to release his original birth certificate or other documents that
would definitively establish his citizenship status and thus his constitutional eligibility.”
The Open Letter to Mr. Obama summarizes the evidence against Mr. Obama and the adverse
consequences that would befall the Nation should he assume the Office of the President as a
usurper
.
– On Monday, December 8, 2008, at 1:30 pm,
Citizen WElls 
Citizen– the following post excerpt came from one of your stories. Can you please site the link as to where it originated? I know you said it was from “Team Obama” but I reposted it on another link and inquiring minds want to know! By the way, keep up the great work! I will check back to this comment section for the link. Thanks!
_____________
The Framers elected not to define “natural born citizen,” except by exempting themselves, which self exemption “could be due the fact that they were not born in the United States without regard to whether or not they had been subject to British jurisdiction,” and the Framers’ lack of concern about dual citizenship or loyalties is shown by their only requiring Presidents to have been residents in the United States for 14 years — meaning an eligible candidate born in the United States still could have resided under the jurisdiction of another country for 21 years or more; and even if the Framers WERE concerned about split loyalties, those were intended to be addressed on a “case by case basis” — and it would not be reasonable to conclude that Obama would have British loyalty since the British Citizenship conferred on him at birth was only “due to his biological relationship to an estranged and unfamiliar father.”
Team Obama concludes that the Framer’s definition of “Natural Born Citizen” is the same as “Citizen” meaning all that is required is birth in the United States, even if neither parent is an American Citizen.
citizenwells.wordpress.com
It was from commenter Ted:
https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/12/07/donofrio-vs-wells-us-supreme-court-natural-born-citizen-obama-not-eligible-father-kenyanbritish-rule-supreme-court-jusctices-answer-us-constitution-connecticut-lawsuit-secretary-of-state-oat/
Citizen –I think it was made to appear that Team Obama did in fact state this. However, it now looks as if Ted was giving his opinion and that it did not come from “Team Obama”, correct?
I have no verification.
Citizen, you are usually much better at posting stories that have been verified! I know you are under alot of stress right now, so all is forgiven! Please post photos as soon as you can from the press conference.
This was not my post!!!
It was a comment.
I allow reasonable comments even if they are contrary to my position.
The Supreme Court rejected Donofrio’s insane clamins:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-obama-birth-certificate1dec08,0,7258812.story
Obviously those radicals who don’t want Obama be president will continue their lawsuits. After all, lawyers are people too and they’re hurting in this economic recession. However, on December 15, the electors will give the presidency (officially) to Obama, and on January 20, we all will witness our new president raise his right hand and pronounce, in front of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court the oath of office: “I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear…”. Get used to it, it’s unstoppable.
If that happens, two people sworn to uphold the US Constitution will be
subject to impeachment.
Where can I find coverage of the news conference.
Good question.
I just went to the National Press club blog site.
I remember hearing from Shulz that Cspan may present it later in the day.
If I find out, I will report.
MasterZorro2008 —
What do you know that WE don’t know?
Can you really know who will say “I . . .” when Chief Justice Roberts says “Raise your right hand and repeat after me . . .”
I think that hell will freeze over BEFORE Chief Justice Roberts administers the Inaugural Oath to someone, unless he KNOWS that they are eligible to serve. That means that after January 8, 2009, Barack Obama may have a whole lot of ‘splainin to do, if he really wants to be President of the United States.