Tag Archives: 2021

Tagged 2021, ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting, Mark Brnovich AG of Arizona et al v DNC et al Oral arguments before SCOTUS March 2

6 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, corruption, Courts, Crime, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Windham NH election recount update Zoom meeting Monday March 1, 2021, Windham Incident, Dominion Voting machines count off by 14 percent in one race

Posted on February 28, 2021 | 5 comments

Windham NH election recount update Zoom meeting Monday March 1, 2021, Windham Incident, Dominion Voting machines count off by 14 percent in one race

“We discovered that these systems are subject to different types of unauthorized manipulation and potential fraud,” “There is a reason that Texas rejected it,”...Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton

“Any system, financial, voting, or otherwise, that is not repeatable nor dependable should not be used,”..Coffee County Board of Elections

“Windham Incident: Largest unexplained discrepancy in New Hampshire history.”…Granite Grok

From Granite Grok

“STAY ENGAGED! The “Windham Incident” Selectman’s Meeting – Monday, March 1 at 7p”

“We must have a complete and thorough analysis and audit of the November 3, 2020 election. We must determine the cause of the largest discrepancy of vote tallies between election day and a hand recount.

I believe strongly that the audit must be held in Windham under the supervision of Windham town government. I also believe the NH AG and SOS must be a part of the process to bring their expertise and oversight, but at an “arms length” involvement – as I believe there is a strong perceived conflict of interest by residents across the state – including myself.

With that in mind, I worked with David Strang and Senator Bob Giuda to put together an Audit Procedures draft proposal to present to the Board of Selectmen. There must be input from town, election officials and the public – to flush out and clearly define a step by step process that would be followed in order to ensure a truly thorough and transparent audit that no one could question once completed.

Please make a statement and join the meeting. You don’t have to talk, just being there sends the message that this is important to you… that you care about our Republic, and that you will not sit idly by while our state government officials do nothing. Your presence will speak volumes!

You can attend in person at Windham High School, 64 London Bridge Rd, Windham 03087, or you can attend via Zoom (details below).

Town of Windham is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.

Topic: Board of Selectman Public / Virtual Meeting

Time: Mar 1, 2021 07:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada)

Join Zoom Meeting”

https://granitegrok.com/mg_windham/2021/02/stay-engaged-the-windham-incident-selectmans-meeting-monday-march-1-at-7p

Citizen Wells February 26, 2021

“The Monitor dismissed the unexplained errors as insignificant and called the concerns “a conspiracy.”

The governor also emphasized that the discrepancy was small in size and tried to extinguish cries of a conspiracy.

It was the largest UNEXPLAINED ELECTION DISCREPANCY in the history of New Hampshire!

Not a conspiracy. An indisputable fact! We don’t know WHY there are voting count discrepancies nor WHERE they occurred. These concerns are shared by NH Senator Bob Giuda in these Op-Eds; “The Windham Incident – Election Results vs Recount Totals” and “The Windham Incident Deception“.

“The fact that we can get granular and focus on one or maybe two machines, or hand-counting 300 individual votes, I think that speaks to the immense integrity of our system,” Sununu said.

To be clear, it was not “300 individual votes” that are in question. The recount discovered errors totaling 1,363 votes from 10,006 ballots cast in the State Rep race. That does not reflect “immense integrity of our system.” Those errors were for only one race. We should recount the other races as well

“And the incredible accuracy. Through all of the different communities in the state, we’re talking about one or two machines in one community.”

No Governor. If it turns out the voting machines were the cause of defective election results in Windham – then we won’t be talking about “incredible accuracy” and just “one or two machines in one community.”

We’ll be talking about ALL OF THE MACHINES THAT ARE USED IN 85% OF NEW HAMPSHIRE!”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/26/windham-nh-dominion-voting-machines-count-off-by-14-percent-in-one-race-governor-sununu-downplays-machines-used-in-85-of-new-hampshire/

More here:

Tagged 2021, Dominion Voting machines count off by 14 percent in one race, Windham Incident, Windham NH election recount update Zoom meeting Monday March 1

Dump

Twitter

5 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Arizona judge rules in favor of senate Feb 26, 2021, Maricopa ballots may be accessed for real audit, Evidence on the machines still there?, Ballots intact?

Posted on February 26, 2021 | 3 comments

Arizona judge rules in favor of senate Feb 26, 2021, Maricopa ballots may be accessed for real audit, Evidence on the machines still there?, Ballots intact?

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

“The Arizona Legislature should immediately march in to Maricopa County, secure the ballots, and with the aid of appropriate law enforcement, arrest anyone obstructing justice.”...Citizen Wells

An Arizona judge has just ruled in favor of the senate.

The ballots may now be accessed for a real audit.

Is the evidence on the voting machines still there?

Are the ballots intact?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tghCgVtbozA

From Citizen Wells February 23, 2021.

ARIZONA STATE SENATOR SONNY BORRELLI INTERVIEW

Three things stand out:

Concerns about evidence tampering.
Republican Senator Paul Boyer is good friends with the Maricopa Board of Supervisors and wants to protect them.
The senate is requesting a Grand Jury Investigation.

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/23/arizona-2020-election-update-feb-23-2021-senator-borrelli-interview-paul-boyer-close-friends-with-maricopa-board-evidence-on-the-machines-still-there-ward-v-jackson-denied/

Arizona SOS Katie Hobbs and Gov Ducey celebrate as they prematurely certify the votes while the Nov 30 election hearing was taking place.

More here:

Tagged 2021, Arizona judge rules in favor of senate Feb 26, Ballots intact?, Evidence on the machines still there?, Maricopa ballots may be accessed for real audit

3 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, fraud, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

Alito Gorsuch dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid SOS, Feb 22, 2021, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied, Amicus briefs accepted

Posted on February 22, 2021 | 1 comment

Alito Gorsuch dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid
SOS, Feb 22, 2021, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied, Amicus briefs accepted

“Between these alternatives there is no middle ground. The constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.”
“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.

So if a law be in opposition to the constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution; or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty.

If then the courts are to regard the constitution; and the constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature; the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.”
“The judicial power of the United States is extended to all cases arising under the constitution. Could it be the intention of those who gave this power, to say that, in using it, the constitution should not be looked into? That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises? This is too extravagant to be maintained.”
“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?”…Marbury V Madison

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

From the US Supreme Court in

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
20–542 v.
VERONICA DEGRAFFENREID, ACTING SECRETARY
OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.

Alito Gorsuch DISSENTING OPINION

“JUSTICE ALITO, with whom JUSTICE GORSUCH joins,
dissenting from the denial of certiorari.
I agree with JUSTICE THOMAS that we should grant re-
view in these cases. They present an important and recur-
ring constitutional question: whether the Elections or Elec-
tors Clauses of the United States Constitution, Art. I, §4,
cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2, are violated when a state court holds
that a state constitutional provision overrides a state stat-
ute governing the manner in which a federal election is to
be conducted. That question has divided the lower courts,*
and our review at this time would be greatly beneficial.
In the cases now before us, a statute enacted by the Penn-
sylvania Legislature unequivocally requires that mailed
ballots be received by 8 p.m. on election day. Pa. Stat. Ann.,
Tit. 25, §§3146.6(c), 3150.16(c) (Purdon 2020). Neverthe-
less, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, citing a provision of
the State Constitution mandating that elections “be free
and equal,” Art. I, §5, altered that deadline and ordered that mailed ballots be counted if received up to three days
after the election, Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boock-
var, ___ Pa. ___, ___–___, 238 A. 3d 345, 362, 371–372
(2020). Both the state Republican and Democratic parties
urged us to grant review and decide this question before the
2020 election. See Application for Stay in Republican Party
of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar, No. 20A54, pp. 2–3; Demo-
cratic Party of Pennsylvania Response to Application for
Stay in No. 20A54, pp. 8–9. But the Court, by an evenly
divided vote, refused to do so. Nos. 20A53 and 20A54, ante,
p. ___ (THOMAS, ALITO, GORSUCH, and KAVANAUGH, JJ.,
noting dissents). That unfortunate decision virtually en-
sured that this important question could not be decided be-
fore the election. See No. 20–542, ante, p. ___ (statement of
ALITO, J., joined by THOMAS and GORSUCH, JJ.).
Now, the election is over, and there is no reason for refus-
ing to decide the important question that these cases pose.
“The provisions of the Federal Constitution conferring on
state legislatures, not state courts, the authority to make
rules governing federal elections would be meaningless if a
state court could override the rules adopted by the legisla-
ture simply by claiming that a state constitutional provi-
sion gave the courts the authority to make whatever rules
it thought appropriate for the conduct of a fair election.”
Ante, at 3; see also Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing
Bd., 531 U. S. 70, 76 (2000) (per curiam). A decision in
these cases would not have any implications regarding the
2020 election. (Because Pennsylvania election officials
were ordered to separate mailed ballots received after the
statutory deadline, see Republican Party of Pa. v. Boockvar,
No. 20A84, ante, p. ___, we know that the State Supreme
Court’s decision had no effect on the outcome of any election
for federal office in Pennsylvania.) But a decision would
provide invaluable guidance for future elections.”

“For these reasons, the cases now before us are not moot.
There is a “reasonable expectation” that the parties will
face the same question in the future, see Wisconsin Right to
Life, Inc., 551 U. S., at 463, and that the question will evade
future pre-election review, just as it did in these cases.
These cases call out for review, and I respectfully dissent
from the Court’s decision to deny certiorari.”

https://www.scribd.com/document/495533990/Supreme-Court-Refuses-Trump-Taxes-Case-2020-Election-Cases-Response#from_embed

More here:

Tagged 2021, Alito Gorsuch dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid SOS, Amicus briefs accepted, Feb 22, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied

1 Comment

Posted in Attorney General, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Civil rights, constitution, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Marbury V Madison, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice

Wood v Raffensperger Lin Wood Writ of Certiorari denied by SCOTUS Feb 22, 2021, Accusations against Chief Justice Roberts have any impact?

Posted on February 22, 2021 | 1 comment

Wood v Raffensperger Lin Wood Writ of Certiorari denied by SCOTUS Feb 22, 2021, Accusations against Chief Justice Roberts have any impact?

“in phone conversation in 8/19, Justice John Roberts stated that he would make sure “the mother f#*ker would never be re-elected.” Roberts engaged in phone conversations with Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to work to get Trump voted out.”...Attorney Lin Wood

“I have also received credible evidence of serious wrongdoing by high-ranking
government officials which I have brought to the attention of the public and to federal law enforcement officials. The evidence of wrongdoing includes evidence of potentially serious crimes perpetrated by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.”...Attorney Lin Wood affidavit

“The oral testimonies of witnesses on December 3, 2020, and subsequently, the written testimonies submitted by many others, provide ample evidence that the 2020 Georgia General Election was so compromised by systemic irregularities and voter fraud that it should not be certified.”…Georgia Senate report December 17, 2020

From the US Supreme Court February 22, 2021.

CERTIORARI DENIED

20-799 WOOD, L. LIN V. RAFFENSPERGER, BRAD, ET AL.

https://www.scribd.com/document/495533990/Supreme-Court-Refuses-Trump-Taxes-Case-2020-Election-Cases-Response#from_embed

From Citizen Wells February 19, 2021.

“Will Lin Wood’s accusations against Chief Justice Roberts have any impact?”

“From Lin Wood’s recent affidavit filed in US District Court:

“I have not received a retraction demand from Justice Roberts or his counsel and he has not made any claim to date that my posts are false and defamatory. Former Vice President Mike Pence or Rod Rosenstein have not sent retraction demands or claims that my posts of and concerning them are false and defamatory.””

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/19/wood-v-raffensperger-scheduled-for-scotus-conference-friday-feb-19-2021-todd-c-bank-amicus-filed-feb-18-how-will-wood-accusations-against-roberts-play-out/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMFy6_ubDLI&feature=emb_logo

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/19/wood-v-raffensperger-scheduled-for-scotus-conference-friday-feb-19-2021-todd-c-bank-amicus-filed-feb-18-how-will-wood-accusations-against-roberts-play-out/

1 Comment

Posted in Accountability, Attorneys, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, constitution, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Marbury V Madison, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice

Tagged 2021, Accusations against Chief Justice Roberts have any impact?, Wood v Raffensperger Lin Wood Writ of Certiorari denied by SCOTUS Feb 22

Justice Thomas dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid SOS, Feb 22, 2021, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied, Amicus briefs accepted

Posted on February 22, 2021 | 3 comments

Justice Thomas dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid
SOS, Feb 22, 2021, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied, Amicus briefs accepted

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

From the US Supreme Court in

REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
20–542 v.
VERONICA DEGRAFFENREID, ACTING SECRETARY
OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.

Justice Thomas Dissenting Opinion

“The motions of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. for
leave to intervene as petitioner are dismissed as moot. The
motions of Thomas J. Randolph, et al. for leave to intervene
as respondents are dismissed as moot. The motion of Hon-
est Elections Project for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae
in No. 20–542 is granted. The motion of White House
Watch Fund, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in
No. 20–574 is granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari
are denied.
JUSTICE THOMAS, dissenting from the denial of certiorari.
The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority
to determine the “Manner” of federal elections. Art. I, §4,
cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2. Yet both before and after the 2020
election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it
upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we
received an unusually high number of petitions and emer-
gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions
here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legisla-
ture established an unambiguous deadline for receiving
mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day. Dissatisfied, the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots
received by the new deadline even if there was no evi-
dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed
by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to
have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any
federal election. But that may not be the case in the future.
These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address
just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec-
tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle.
The refusal to do so is inexplicable.”

“Because the judicial system is not well suited to address
these kinds of questions in the short time period available
immediately after an election, we ought to use available
cases outside that truncated context to address these ad-
mittedly important questions. Here, we have the oppor-tunity to do so almost two years before the next federal elec-
tion cycle. Our refusal to do so by hearing these cases is
befuddling. There is a clear split on an issue of such great
importance that both sides previously asked us to grant cer-
tiorari. And there is no dispute that the claim is sufficiently
meritorious to warrant review. By voting to grant emer-
gency relief in October, four Justices made clear that they
think petitioners are likely to prevail. Despite pressing for
review in October, respondents now ask us not to grant cer-
tiorari because they think the cases are moot. That argu-
ment fails.
The issue presented is capable of repetition, yet evades
review. This exception to mootness, which the Court rou-
tinely invokes in election cases, “applies where (1) the chal-
lenged action is in its duration too short to be fully litigated
prior to cessation or expiration, and (2) there is a reasonable
expectation that the same complaining party will be subject
to the same action again.” Davis v. Federal Election
Comm’n, 554 U. S. 724, 735 (2008) (internal quotation
marks omitted) (resolving a dispute from the 2006 election);
see also Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U. S. 780, 784, and
n. 3 (1983) (resolving a dispute from the 1980 election).
Here, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its decision
about six weeks before the election, leaving little time for
review in this Court. And there is a reasonable expectation
that these petitioners—the State Republican Party and leg-
islators—will again confront nonlegislative officials alter-
ing election rules. In fact, various petitions claim that no
fewer than four other decisions of the Pennsylvania Su-
preme Court implicate the same issue.3 Future cases will
arise as lower state courts apply those precedents to justify
intervening in elections and changing the rules.

One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to set-
tle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear
rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future
elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath
a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite
further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fel-
low citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respect-
fully dissent.”

https://www.scribd.com/document/495533990/Supreme-Court-Refuses-Trump-Taxes-Case-2020-Election-Cases-Response#from_embed

More here:

Tagged 2021, Amicus briefs accepted, Feb 22, Justice Thomas dissent Republican Party of Pennsylvania v Degraffenreid SOS, Trump Writ of Certiorari denied

3 Comments

Posted in Attorney General, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, constitution, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Marbury V Madison, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice

2020 election lawsuits in conference before US Supreme Court Friday March 5, 2021, Trump v Wisconsin Elections Commission, Lin Wood v Raffensperger

Posted on February 20, 2021 | 3 comments

2020 election lawsuits in conference before US Supreme Court Friday March 5, 2021, Trump v Wisconsin Elections Commission, Lin Wood v Raffensperger

“Administrative changes in Wisconsin election put tens of thousands of votes in question. From allowing clerks to fix spoiled ballots to permitting voters to escape ID rules, Wisconsin election officials took actions that were not authorized by legislature.”...Just The News Nov 8

No. 20-883

Donald J. Trump v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-883

No. 20-887

In re L. Lin Wood, Jr.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-887

More here:

Tagged 2020 election lawsuits in conference before US Supreme Court Friday March 5, 2021, Lin Wood v Raffensperger, Trump v Wisconsin Elections Commission

3 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, constitution, Court of Appeals, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Secretary of State, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, Voter fraud, voters

Arizona Senate passed Senate Bill 1408 “subpoena bill”, Feb 19, 2021, ” legislature has the authority to investigate any matter”

Posted on February 19, 2021 | 7 comments

Arizona Senate passed Senate Bill 1408 “subpoena bill”, Feb 19, 2021, ” legislature has the authority to investigate any matter”

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

“The Arizona Legislature should immediately march in to Maricopa County, secure the ballots, and with the aid of appropriate law enforcement, arrest anyone obstructing justice.”...Citizen Wells

From Washington Radar February 19, 2021.

“The Arizona state Senate passed Senate Bill 1408 on a party-line 16-14 vote Thursday, giving the legislature the express authority to subpoena ballots, election equipment and information from counties. It also explicitly states that the legislature has the authority to investigate any matter.

The bill, sponsored by Sen. Warren Petersen, R-Gilbert, was passed in the event that a judge ruled that the law doesn’t give the legislature the authority to subpoena ballots and tabulation machines from Maricopa County so it can conduct an audit of the November 2020 election.

Senate President Karen Fann and Petersen, who chairs the Judiciary Committee, have issued subpoenas to Maricopa County demanding that it turn over 2.1 million ballots, ballot tabulation machines and other materials and data from the November election.

Petersen introduced the legislation after the Maricopa County Supervisors challenged the subpoenas in court, arguing that it would be illegal for it to hand over the ballots, that it can’t allow unauthorized auditors to examine the tabulation machines, and that the Senate generally lacks the authority to demand those materials.

A Maricopa County Superior Court judge will hear arguments in the case next week and expects to rule on the matter quickly”

https://www.washingtonradar.com/arizona-senate-passes-subpoena-bill-amid-battle-over-audit/.

Arizona SOS Katie Hobbs and Gov Ducey celebrate as they prematurely certify the votes while the Nov 30 election hearing was taking place.

More here:

Tagged " legislature has the authority to investigate any matter", 2021, Arizona Senate passed Senate Bill 1408 "subpoena bill", Feb 19

7 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Arizona, Board of Elections, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Civil rights, corruption, Courts, Election 2020, Election Boards, Election Law, Election update, Electoral College, Electors, Secretary of State, Voter fraud, voters

2020 election lawsuits in conference before US Supreme Court Friday February 19, 2021, Arizona Georgia Pennsylvania Michigan Wisconsin

Posted on February 19, 2021 | 6 comments

2020 election lawsuits in conference before US Supreme Court Friday February 19, 2021, Arizona Georgia Pennsylvania Michigan Wisconsin

“Resolved, That the members of the Wisconsin State Assembly place the
redress to these and other election law violations and failed administrative procedures as its highest priority “...WI legislature Jan 4, 2021

From the US Supreme Court Friday, February 19, 2021.

No. 20-542

Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Veronica Degraffenreid, Acting Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-542

No. 20-815

Timothy King, et al. v. Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-815

No. 20-882

Donald J. Trump, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-882

No. 20-845

Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. v. Veronica Degraffenreid, Acting Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-845

No. 20-809

Kelli Ward v. Constance Jackson, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-809

No. 20-799

L. Lin Wood, Jr. v. Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-799

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/19/wood-v-raffensperger-scheduled-for-scotus-conference-friday-feb-19-2021-todd-c-bank-amicus-filed-feb-18-how-will-wood-accusations-against-roberts-play-out/

No. 20-810

Mike Kelly, United States Congressman, et al. v. Pennsylvania, et al.

https://certpool.com/dockets/20-810

More here:

Tagged 2020 election lawsuits in conference before US Supreme Court Friday February 19, 2021, Arizona Georgia Pennsylvania Michigan Wisconsin

6 Comments

Posted in Accountability, Attorneys, Citizen News, Citizens for the truth about Obama, CitizenWells, Court of Appeals, Courts, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice

Arizona election audit update February 6, 2021, Senate votes on Maricopa Board contempt Mon, Mike Lindell AZ vote irregularities look plausible, Left panics

Posted on February 6, 2021 | 6 comments

Arizona election audit update February 6, 2021, Senate votes on Maricopa Board contempt Mon, Mike Lindell AZ vote irregularities look plausible, Left panics

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

“The resolution, introduced by Senate President Karen Fann, R-Prescott, states that all five of Maricopa County’s board of supervisors are in contempt of the Arizona Senate for refusing to turn over access to election equipment and ballots that the Senate demanded for an audit. It also directs Fann to take “all legal action” to enforce the subpoena.”…Arizona Senate

The left is in panic mode.

That is why they are attacking Mike Lindell and his “Absolute Proof” video revealing vast irregularities in the 2020 election in battleground states.

Lindell’s irrgularities and numbers for Arizona appear plausible and in line with other data revelations.

https://michaeljlindell.com/

We already knew for example that there were over 200,000 adjudicated ballots in Maricopa County alone.

They are a problem.

The left is further in panic mode over the imminent full audit from the Arizona Senate.

Senate President Fann

“There are two primary reasons we have determined the Senate needed to retain its own independent auditing firm. The Senate has consistently called for an auditor certified by the U. S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC). We have now learned the EAC does not certify auditors as such. The other primary reason is that the scope of the audit must be broader than the one proposed by the County’s vendors. Our firm will perform everything we have required in the subpoenas. We must bring back confidence that the election results reported are how votes were legally cast. The Senate’s forensic audit will bring accuracy and detail to the process, and with that restore integrity to the election process.”

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/03/arizona-senate-election-audit-update-february-3-2021-maricopa-county-board-of-supervisors-refuses-to-comply-our-firm-will-perform-everything-we-have-required-in-the-subpoenas/

Maricopa Board of Supervisors contempt

“All 16 Republicans in the Arizona Senate signed on to a measure introduced Wednesday afternoon that could lead to sending the Senate’s sergeant at arms to arrest Maricopa County’s elected supervisors as early as Friday.

The resolution, introduced by Senate President Karen Fann, R-Prescott, states that all five of Maricopa County’s board of supervisors are in contempt of the Arizona Senate for refusing to turn over access to election equipment and ballots that the Senate demanded for an audit. It also directs Fann to take “all legal action” to enforce the subpoena.

Under state law, the Senate can send the sergeant at arms to arrest the five supervisors and bring them before the Senate. “

https://citizenwells.com/2021/02/04/arizona-senate-election-audit-update-february-4-2021-signed-resolution-directs-president-fann-to-take-all-legal-action-to-enforce-the-subpoena-dr-lyle-rapacki-updates/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuKqn2uEfH0&t=53s

More here: