Category Archives: Natural born citizen

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Obama served, DNC served, FEC served, FOIA request to FEC, FEC FOIA status, FEC response by October 21, 2008, Citizen Wells phone call to FEC

The MSM has not covered the story of the Philip J Berg lawsuit served
on Barack Obama, the DNC and the FEC. Many people have contacted us
in disbelief at the lack of MSM coverage. It is our duty to keep you
informed and we will continue to do so. If you are unaware of the details
regarding the lawsuit, click on the page link at the top of this blog.
Here are the response deadlines for the Philip J Berg lawsuit:

Berg v. Obama, et al. Civil Case No. 08-cv-04083
 
Answers are due from the various parties to the lawsuite as follows:

Barrack Obama September 24, 2008;

DNC: September 24, 2008 and

FEC: October 21, 2008 (Federal and Government Employees and Entities have sixty (60) days)
 

Citizen Wells requested information via the FOIA from the FEC on 9/13/2008. Here is the FOIA request made to the FEC:
Date 9/13/2008

Federal Election Commission
Attn: FOIA Requester Service Center
Room 408
999 E Street, NW
Washington, DC 20463

Re: Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request

Dear Sir / Madam:

This is a request for records under the Freedom of Information Act [or Privacy Act]. I am requesting records created or dated between the dates of August 21, 2008 and September 13, 2008. Specifically, I am requesting documents that relate to

the Philip J Berg lawsuit initiated and served on Barack Obama, the DNC and the FEC.

For the purposes of determining what, if any, fees may be assessed in connection with the processing of this request, I am

a representative of the news media requesting records as part of a newsgathering effort. I am affiliated with Citizen Wells blog. This has an educational aspect due to students getting information from the blog in the absence of reporting by the MSM.

I request a waiver of all fees for this request. Disclosure of the requested information to me is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to the public understanding of the operations or activities of the government and is not primarily my commercial interest. As stated above, the MSM is not covering this story and the public deserves to know the truth and have the facts reported in a timely manner.

If you have any questions regarding this request, my daytime telephone number is ___________. My email address is ____________. Thank you for your consideration of this request.

Sincerely,

Citizen Wells
The FEC responded via email on Thursday, September 18, 2008. Here is the FEC response:
Citizen Wells
Subject:                        Your Freedom of Information Act Request to the
Federal Election Commission

Dear Citizen Wells:

This email acknowledges receipt of your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated September 13, 2008.

Please note that, depending upon the nature of your request, we may be able to respond to you more quickly if you are able to state your request more specifically or narrowly, either in terms of the scope of documents you have requested or by refining the timeframe of your request.  If you would like to discuss this option or if you have any questions, please contact the FOIA Requester Service Center at (202) 694-1650.  Please include the following tracking number in all future correspondence regarding this matter – FOIA Request XXXXXX.

Thank you for contacting the Federal Election Commission.

                                       

                                                        Sincerely,

                                                        Candace J. Salley
                                                        FOIA Requester Service

 
I phoned Candace J. Salley on friday, September 19, 2008. She was out of the office and I left a message. I will attempt to speak with her on Monday. I will keep you informed.

Philip J Berg lawsuit, Obama must respond by September 24, 2008, Obama born in Kenya, Fake COLB, Indonesian citizen, AP photo, Obama alias, Traffic violations, Bar application, Selective Service, Obama response

Barack Obama has been served a lawsuit initiated by Philip J Berg
and must respond by September 24, 2008. Obama is a Harvard Law
School graduate. If Obama is indeed qualified for the presidency
why didn’t he proactively prove this at the beginning. All we have
seen so far is a fake COLB on his website and other sites. To add insult
to injury, factcheck.org, tied to Annenberg, has proclaimed the
COLB real.

It is now a near certainty that Obama was born in Kenya and that
Obama lied on his bar application by leaving out alias and traffic
violations. Multiple family members attest to Obama’s Kenyan birth
and a African website months ago proclaimed his Kenyan birth. Since
Obama has not provided credentials to prove he is qualified for the
presidency, how will Obama respond to the lawsuit? Here are some
issues that need resolving:

  • Obama was born in Kenya.
  • Obama may have a document from Hawaii that is a substitute.
  • The COLB produced by the Obama camp is fake.
  • Obama was a citizen of Indonesia. There is a AP photo that
    shows his name as Barry Soetoro and a citizen of Indonesia.
  • Obama claimed to be a US citizen and omitted his alias and traffic
    violations on his bar application.
  • Obama apparently did not renounce other citizenships and pledge
    allegiance to the US at age eighteen.
  • There is no evidence of Obama registering with Selective Service.
  • Obama ran for the Democrat Nomination for president and with full
    knowledge that he was not qualified and that this lawsuit had been
    filed, proceeded with impunity for the law and the political process.

 

If the past is any determiner of the future, Obama will use diversions and attacks and continue to act outside of the law.

Send the Message to Obama that you want him out of office:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Philip J Berg Birth Certificate update, COLB fake, factcheck.org COLB altered and forged, Obama supply birth certificate

Philip J Berg has provided an update regarding Obama’s birth certificate. Here are some exerpts from his website:

“We have a further analysis into the Certificate of Live Birth documents (COLB) posted on Mr. Obama’s website,  fightthesmears.com.

The COLB posted and analyzed on the Daily Kos and the COLB posted by factcheck.org, were found to be altered and forged.

Ron Polarik specializes in computer graphics with over 20 years experience with computers, printers, and typewriters. He holds a PhD in Instructional Media, took on this project, prior to our asking, and has been working on it for several months.

Mr. Polarik has prepared an updated and extensive report regarding these forgeries and altered COLBS. Mr. Polarik took it a step further and obtained further review to collaborate his findings.

Please find part one of Mr. Polark’s findings below.

Overview

In the June 9, 2008 edition of National Review Online, writer Jim Geraghty posted the following story to his blog, the Campaign Spot:

Obama Could Debunk Some Rumors By Releasing His Birth Certificate.

Having done some Obama-rumor debunking that got praise from Daily Kos (a sign of the apocalypse, no doubt), perhaps the Obama campaign could return the favor and help debunk a bunch of others with a simple step: Could they release a copy of his birth certificate? Reporters have asked for it and been denied, and the state of Hawaii does not make such records public…There are several (unlikely) rumors circulating regarding Obama’s birth certificate.

Geraghty listed these rumors as (1) Obama was born in Kenya, (2) Obama’s middle name is really “Muhammad” and (3) Obama’s first name is really “Barry,” as he was called when he was a child growing up in Indonesia. Geraghty concluded his article by saying that “If the concern of the Obama campaign is that the certificate includes…some other data that could be useful to identity thieves, that information could easily be blocked out and the rest released.

Three days later, as if on cue, the pro-Obama Daily Kos blog posted an image of what they claimed was a scanned copy of Barack Obama’s “original birth certificate” sent to them by the Obama Campaign:”

Read more here:

http://www.obamacrimes.com

Philip J Berg answer, September 17, 2008, constitutional issue, Jeff Schreiber questions, Obama not qualified to be president, No pending motion to dismiss

Philip J Berg has responded to the email I sent earlier regarding questions posed by Jeff Schreiber. Here is some of the dialogue Jeff Schreiber had with Mr. Berg:

“I ran into Philip Berg yesterday at the courthouse here in Philadelphia and, knowing from previous cases against McCain what to expect from Judge Alsup in California, once again asked him about standing. I mentioned that, just as McCain and the GOP did against Markham Robinson, Barack Obama and the DNC will likely respond to the complaint with a similar motion to dismiss for lack of standing, and asked why he felt his situation was so markedly different than those of Robinson or John Hollander.

Berg maintained that this is a constitutional issue, and that Robinson did not necessarily frame it in that regard, and mentioned that during the initial hearing on the temporary restraining order Judge Surrick asked about his standing and was satisfied enough with the answer so as not to dismiss the case outright. Personally, I look at the constitutional nature of Berg’s suit as sufficient to satisfy questions of subject matter jurisdiction, not standing.”

Read more from Jeff Schreiber here:

http://www.americasright.com/

Here is the response from Philip J Berg:

“Hi Mr. Wells,

As Jeff Schreiber and I discussed, there is not a pending motion to dismiss by any of the Defendants before the Court.  Defendants may choose to file a motion to dismiss, at which time I will properly Oppose and reply.   For this reason, and at this point, I can’t tip my hand.

Phil”

Obama must respond by September 24, 2008.

Philip J Berg Obama lawsuit, Update, Jeff Schreiber poses questions, Constitutional issue, September 17, 2008, Philip J Berg questions

Barack Obama, the DNC and the FEC have been served with the Philip J Berg lawsuit stating that Obama is not qualified to be president. Obama must respond by September 24, 2008. Jeff Schreiber has a blog, America’s Right. He descibes himself as:

“Legal writer by day, exhausted law student by night. Lucky husband and proud father throughout.”

Jeff Schreiber has posed some questions to Philip J Berg after a judge ruled on a similar lawsuit regarding John McCain’s eligibility to run for president. Here are some exerpts:

“I ran into Philip Berg yesterday at the courthouse here in Philadelphia and, knowing from previous cases against McCain what to expect from Judge Alsup in California, once again asked him about standing. I mentioned that, just as McCain and the GOP did against Markham Robinson, Barack Obama and the DNC will likely respond to the complaint with a similar motion to dismiss for lack of standing, and asked why he felt his situation was so markedly different than those of Robinson or John Hollander.

Berg maintained that this is a constitutional issue, and that Robinson did not necessarily frame it in that regard, and mentioned that during the initial hearing on the temporary restraining order Judge Surrick asked about his standing and was satisfied enough with the answer so as not to dismiss the case outright. Personally, I look at the constitutional nature of Berg’s suit as sufficient to satisfy questions of subject matter jurisdiction, not standing.”

“I asked him about it, and he promised to get back to me in a little while. When he does, I will surely relay the information here.”

Read more from Jeff Schreiber here:

http://www.americasright.com/

I sent an email to Philip J Berg also requesting his response. I will post the response as soon as received.

Don’t wait for the courts to rule. Voice your concern about Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Obama job application, References, Smoking, Drug test, Obama honest?, Would Obama get the Job? Would Obama pass a drug test?

Hi Mr. Obama, my name is Uncle Sam. I am the personnel director
at US Govco. Mr. Obama, we have contacted your references and reviewed your application. There are a number of issues we need to resolve:

1. Your current employer states that you have been absent more than
present and they are not sure what you have been working on.

2. On your application you checked non smoker, but we have verification
of you smoking recently.

3. And, oh, by the way, one of your family members mentioned another
name you went by. You left alias blank on the application.

4. You indicated on your application that you are a US citizen. However, our investigator, after much digging discovered a lawsuit by an attorney, Philip J Berg, that states you are not a US citizen. 

5. And one last item, we requested a drug test. We require that of
all applicants. Why have you not taken the drug test?

All of you that have ever applied for a job know that the above
credentials and information are asked of the average citizen when
applying for a job.

Is Obama any better than you?

Should we expect any less of the president?

If you do not want to hire Obama, visit:

http://obamaimpeachment.org

Obama not US citizen, McCain is US citizen, Philip J Berg lawsuit, Obama not Qualified, US Code: Title 8, Section 1403, McCain is qualified

 Philip J Berg filed a lawsuit in Philadephia Federal Court, and it
has been served on Barack Obama, DNC and FEC. The basis of the suit
is Obama:
Is not a natural-born citizen; and/or
Lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia; and/or
Has dual loyalties because of his citizenship with Kenya and Indonesia

Many commenters on this blog and throughout the country are confused about the laws regarding eligibility to be president and some believe that McCain is not eligible. He clearly is. However, the same is not true for Obama. It is apparent that Obama was born in Kenya. 

The following was posted by Leeballz, a regular commenter on Citizen Wells. I would like to thank Leeballz again for all the help provided.

“Apparently I can’t post this enough:

US Code: Title 8, Section 1403.

Persons born in the Canal Zone or Republic of Panama on or after February 26, 1904

(a) Any person born in the Canal Zone on or after February 26, 1904, and whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such person was or is a citizen of the United States, is declared to be a citizen of the United States.

(b) Any person born in the Republic of Panama on or after February 26, 1904, and whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such person was or is a citizen of the United States employed by the Government of the United States or by the Panama Railroad Company, or its successor in title, is declared to be a citizen of the United States.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1403.html

Michael,

You are right that if Obama was born in Hawaii that he would be eligible. If he was borne outside of the U.S. (or outside of any U.S. controlled areas abroad like military bases) he would not be. Unless of course there is a law that did give him eligibility if borne abroad; like his mother being able to transfer that right to him. However, if he was a citizen and he moved to another country and received citizenship there, then he would have dual citizenship. As I mentioned above, I don’t think dual citizenship would disqualify him. I have dual citizenship, but was borne not 20 miles from Washington, D.C. I believe I would be eligible if I wanted to run. Again, though if the country that he took up residence in, required him to denounce or revoke his U.S. citizenship and he never reinstated it (if that’s even possible), then we have a huge problem over a rather small technicality. The huge problem is called “Precedent.” The funny thing with it is if you set it, then it is very hard to get rid of. I don’t think this office is one that needs to cause a constitutional crisis or constitutional amendment for one candidate.

So I think this lawsuit should be an easy thing for Obama to settle and if so, then he will gain many more votes from it. He should be excited to prove his citizenship because of that reason, yet he hasn’t publicly challenged it except for a disputed birth certificate on an obscure website. Why? Why hasn’t he produced the records from the hospital, I would presume he could have gotten them on his vacation. However, those who wish to think negatively of him will still see the possibility of forgery, but he can then disprove that too if that is false.

Questions are good, they provide answers.”

From Obama not qualified for presidency lawsuit, Philip J Berg, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY, September 10, 2008, SEEKS DEPOSITION OF BARACK OBAMA AND HOWARD DEAN BY END OF MONTH, Jeff Schreiber explains, 2008/09/12 at 12:51 PM

Read all about the Philip J Berg lawsuit here:

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/philip-j-berg-lawsuit/

Visit Philip J Berg’s website:

http://www.obamacrimes.com

Philip J Berg lawsuit timeline, Resources, Interview, Mr. Berg, Updates, Breaking news, Born in Kenya, News articles, Facts, Documents, Docket entries, Obama DNC FEC served

The Citizen Wells blog has a page devoted to the timeline of the Philip J Berg lawsuit that has been served on Obama, the DNC and the FEC. Obama must respond to the lawsuit by September 24, 2008. The new page can be accessed from the top of the blog or from this link:

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/philip-j-berg-lawsuit/

Notice the banner below that was on an African website and then later removed. Obama was born in kenya.

 

From African website

From African website

Philip J Berg Lawsuit Sequence of Events


Aug 21, 2008
     Philip J Berg files lawsuit in Philadelphia Federal Court

Aug 23, 2008     Great interview of Philip J Berg


Aug 25, 2008
     Philadelphia TimesHerald Article

Aug 27, 2008
     Complaint served on the U.S. Attorney for DNC and FEC

Aug 28, 2008
     Philadelphia Times Herald has an update

Aug 29, 2008
     Washington Times article

Aug 29, 2008
     Philip J Berg update

Sept 3, 2008      Update, Summons Reissued


Sept 4, 2008
      Obama served

Sept 7, 2008
      MSM not covering story, update

Sept 9, 2008
      Questions for Philip J Berg

Sept 9, 2008
      Latest Docket Entries


Sept 10, 2008
    Philip J Berg answers, Motion for Expedited Discovery

Sept 10, 2008
    Explanations and commentary from Jeff Schreiber

Sept 11, 2008
    Philip J Berg provides updates and new documents

Philip J Berg interview, Jeff Schreiber, America’s Right blog, Berg answers questions, Complaint, Obama Lawsuit, Obama not US citizen, Truth about Philip J Berg, Great interview

Philip J Berg filed a lawsuit in Philadephia Federal Court, and it
has been served on Barack Obama, DNC and FEC. The basis of the suit
is Obama:
Is not a natural-born citizen; and/or
Lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia; and/or
Has dual loyalties because of his citizenship with Kenya and Indonesia

The MSM has failed the American public. Philip J Berg is a Democrat who tried to provide information to the Democratic Delegates before the convention, and because of a lack of coverage by the MSM and pressure from the DNC and the likes of Nancy Pelosi to push the nomination of Obama, was unable to affect the nomination. However, Mr. Berg is still trying to prevent a constitutional crisis and is moving ahead with the lawsuit. Obama has been served and must respond by September 24, 2008. Many commenters on this blog have questioned the motives of the lawsuit. Jeff Schreiber, who studies law and writes articles on his excellent blog site, interviewed Philip J Berg on August 23, 2008. Here are some exerpts from this must read interview:

“Saturday, August 23, 2008
A Conversation with Philip J. Berg, Esq.
 
Fairly late yesterday evening, I had the opportunity to speak with Philip Berg, the Philadelphia attorney who filed suit against Illinois senator Barack Obama in Federal Court in Philadelphia, questioning the constitutional eligibility of his candidacy for president.”

“I have had no direct or indirect contact with anyone on the Hillary Clinton campaign. Did I help her in the primaries? Yes. Was I in favor of her over Obama? Yes. What did I do? I contributed some money and made some phone calls to various states for her. Other than that, I attended one Montgomery County [PA] Democratic Committee dinner at which her daughter spoke, though for the record, Obama’s representative was also at the same function. So, am I closely involved with them? No.

And as I told you this afternoon, even among those who helped me prepare for this case, while I know they may be against Obama’s violation of the Constitution, I do not even know nor have I asked where they stand politically.”

“That, and he had an excuse for everything. His phony responses to the Rev. [Jeremiah] Wright issue turned me off. He said “I never knew what he was like.” He was a member of that church for twenty years. Twenty years! When the story first broke, he went on all of the television and cable stations and claimed he was never in the pew when Rev. Wright made any of these remarks. By the time he made his speech in Philadelphia days later—a speech that the mainstream media agreed might have been the best in the history of the world—he did a complete turnabout and admitted that he was in the pew at the time of the remarks. At what point is enough, enough?”

“I chalk much of his success up to the influence and agenda setting of the mainstream media. Speaking of which, are you happy with the coverage which the mainstream press has given your civil action?

Well, no. First of all, the mainstream media hasn’t covered it yet. I’m doing an interview with a journalist tomorrow morning at 10:00 who says he’ll be able to get it out into the mainstream media.”

“Of course some people might look at me and assume I’m doing this because he’s black. I’m not. I’m Jewish, and I’m a life-long member of the NAACP, so people will be hard-pressed to confront me on any of those issues.”

“Look, the truth comes down to this — at this point in time, it’s time to fish or cut bait, time to stop pussy-footing around. At this point in time, Obama owes it to people to produce the documents. If I’m wrong, even if he doesn’t want to handle it himself and has the person in charge of his campaign communications come out and say, “here is the vault copy of the birth certificate, here is the certified copy of his oath of allegiance from when he came back from Indonesia, this issue should be put to bed and Mr. Berg should withdraw his suit immediately or we’ll sue him to high heaven,” then I’m wrong. If they do not do that within the next day or so, then I know we’re right. If they let the case linger, then I believe we’re right. The challenge I’ve made to them is that, if they don’t produce these documents, then we know they’re wrong.”
“In terms of credibility, my very successful record in big cases shows some of that. I’m the only attorney in the country to defeat “cell phone” legislation in Hilltown Township, Bucks County, PA, meant to ban the use of hand-held cell phones while behind the wheel of a car, and did that pro bono. I have also represented PAWS—Performing Animal Welfare Society—in California, pro bono, protecting the rights of abused circus elephants, and was extremely successful in that case. My record, over the years, is such that I can stand on my own two feet in front of anyone.”

There is much more to this great interview by Jeff Schreiber:

http://www.americasright.com/2008/08/q-with-phillip-berg.html

Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Philip J Berg, Obama lawsuit, Biden comments, Larry Sinclair, Hillary replace Obama, Hillary replace Biden, Did Biden open the door to bow out?, Biden dropping out?

Today the Citizen Wells blog doubled it’s viewership record for
one day. One article, an update on the Philip J Berg lawsuit
that has been served on Obama, the DNC and the FEC, got the lion’s
share of views. Why did this happen? Am I a great writer? Probably
not. The real answer is that the American people are starved for
the truth about Obama and the MSM is failing them. Of course I am
getting help from other bloggers and readers for which I am
truly grateful. The lack of coverage of Obama by the MSM is a huge
story that will continue to unwind through the election cycle.

However, there is another story that is connected to the Philip J
Berg lawsuit and other stories.

For several days, commenters on this blog, other bloggers and people
around me have been discussing Joe Biden and especially the comments
he recently made about Hillary Clinton. Is Joe Biden opening the
door to bow out? Was this part of a prearranged plan? Rush Limbaugh
claims to have predicted Biden’s actions for some time.

A few hours ago, I posted the following on twitter.com/citizenwells
and I did so without discussing it with Larry Sinclair. Here is what
I posted:

Option

1. Obama disqualified/indicted before election.

2. Obama disqualified/indicted after election, before oath of office.

3. Obama impeached/indicted after oath of office.

4. Obama loses (preferred). Hillary waits 4 years.

Hillary’s odds are good.

For months I have read hundreds of comments regarding the election
and I have come to the conclusion that there is something resembling
a collective consciousness occuring.

Larry Sinclair called me a few minutes ago about some information
he received and about conversations we had when he was in Washington
DC for the Democrats Meeting. (Clarification for MSM, ongoing
conversations occur when you follow a story). All I can say about
what he told me then is that it involved people connected to
Hillary. Larry told me he justed posted a new article and here it is:

“Thursday, September 11, 2008
IS JOE BIDEN GOING TO WITHDRAW FROM THE OBAMA TICKET TO MAKE ROOM FOR HILLARY?
Is Joe Biden going to withdraw from the Obama/Biden ticket to make room for Hillary Clinton?

Could some of my meetings and phone conversation while in DC in May and June of 2008 now being used to have Joe Biden withdraw for personal or medical reasons from the Democratic ticket, making way for Hillary Clinton? This is the feeling coming from some people and it would explain some high level contacts and communications in May and June while I was in DC.

Nothing would surprise me in the Obama camp and I can only say I hope that there is no truth to the emails I am receiving.”

Read more here:

http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com

To voice your opinion about Obama:

http://obamaimpeachment.org