Assange testimony requested in Rich v Butowsky et al August 24, 2020, Seth Rich Wikileaks source of DNC files?, Requests international judicial assistance
“Ms. Sines’s testimony flatly contradicts the FBI’s claims that (1) it did not investigate matters pertaining to Mr. Rich; (2) it did not examine his computer; and (3) it conducted a “reasonable” search but could not locate any records or communications about Mr. Rich. Specifically, Ms. Sines’s testimony flatly contradicts the affidavit testimony of FBI Section Chief David M. Hardy.”…Attorney Ty Clevenger March 29, 2020
“I repeatedly asked U.S. Attorney John Durham and DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz to investigate whether Mr. Hardy lied under oath, and in an April 22, 2020 letter Mr. Horowitz wrote that he referred my complaint to the FBI’s Inspection Division. Was Mr. Hardy forced out?”…Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020
“Re: Seth Rich, keep an eye on the National Security Division of the Justice Department. As you can see from the federal complaint, the NSD ignored a FOIA request that I filed back in 2018 for records about Seth Rich. And look at Paragraph 16, plus Exhibit 8. I think NSD is playing a bigger role in the “Russian hacking” narrative than most of us understood. By sending Seth Rich records there, it’s easier to keep things classified. So why would a “street robbery” investigation need to be classified?”…Attorney Ty Clevenger July 22, 2020
From Aaron Rich v Edward Butowsky, et al August 24, 2020.
REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE
LETTER OF REQUEST PURSUANT TO THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 18 MARCH
1970 ON THE TAKING OF EVIDENCE ABROAD IN CIVIL OR COMMERCIAL
MATTERS (THE “HAGUE CONVENTION”)
“The United States District Court for the District of Columbia presents its compliments to the appropriate judicial authority of the United Kingdom (“UK”), and requests international judicial assistance to obtain evidence to be used in a civil proceeding before this Court in the above-captioned matter. Upon hearing the Plaintiff’s Motion for Issuance of a Letter of Requestter “Governski Decl.”), this Court has determined that it would further the interests of justice if by the proper and usual process of your Court, you summon Julian Assange to appear before a person empowered under English law to administer oaths and take testimony forthwith, to give testimony under oath or affirmation by
questions and answers upon oral examination in respect of the matters and issues identified below, and permit the parties to create a written transcript and video recording of such testimony.
The applicant for thisletter is Aaron Rich. UK counsel is available to answer any questions the Court may have.”
“The testimony is intended for use at trial, and in the view of this Court, will be relevant to claims and defenses in the case, including Plaintiff Aaron Rich’s allegations of defamation.”
“Defendants have seized upon statements that WikiLeaks’ founder, Julian Assange, made on a Dutch television program approximately one month after Seth Rich’s murder. In that interview, Mr. Assange made comments that Defendants have interpreted as an insinuation (or more) that Seth Rich may have been a WikiLeaks source. Although WikiLeaks subsequently
released a statement on Twitter that its policy of neither confirming nor denying “whether any person has ever been a source for WikiLeaks” should “not be taken to imply that Seth Rich was a source to WikiLeaks or to imply that his murder is connected to our publications,” WikiLeaks nonetheless continued to publish tweets about Seth Rich that provided fodder for Defendants’
conspiracy theories. Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded that Assange’s and WikiLeaks’ “statements about Rich implied falsely that he had been the source of the stolen DNC emails,” noting that “information uncovered during the investigation discredit WikiLeaks’ claims about the source of material that it posted.””
Read more:
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.194794/gov.uscourts.dcd.194794.230.0.pdf
More here:
Advertisements
Occasionally, some of your visitors may see an advertisement here,
as well as a Privacy & Cookies banner at the bottom of the page.
You can hide ads completely by upgrading to one of our paid plans.
10 RESPONSES TO “JULIAN ASSANGE TESTIMONY REQUESTED IN RICH V FOX NEWS AUGUST 5, 2020, SETH RICH INVOLVEMENT IN DNC EMAIL AND DOCUMENT LEAK, UK COURT PER HAGUE CONVENTION”
LEAVE A REPLY
-
CITIZEN NEWS -
RECENT COMMENTS
oldsailor88 on Boycott Goodyear which support… oldsailor88 on Boycott Goodyear which support… oldsailor88 on Boycott Goodyear which support… hapnHal on Boycott Goodyear which support… oldsailor88 on Boycott Goodyear which support… -
CITIZEN NEWS ARTICLES
- Boycott Goodyear which supports racist Marxist “Black lives matter” and zero tolerance for “All lives matter” MAGA attire and “Blue lives matter”
- Jonathan Turley et al schooled on Kamala Harris NBC status by Citizen Wells commenter, Turley commenter and of course Wells, Harris not Natural Born Citizen
- Kamala Harris eligible? Jonathan Turley says yes quotes flawed CRS report, Natural Born Citizen requirement, Citizen not enough, SCOTUS ruling required
- Kevin Clinesmith plea deal better topple bigger scumbags, Clinesmith guilty of crimes against US, “impacted the reputation of the FBI”, Horowitz June 2018 report
- US v Kevin Clinesmith August 14, 2020, First John Durham investigation criminal case, Clinesmith to plead guilty, Altered OGA liaison email
Citizen WElls 
“Immediately after President Trump won election, opponents inaugurated what they call ‘The Resistance’ and they rallied around an explicit strategy of using every tool and maneuver to sabotage the functioning of the executive branch.” …Attorney General Barr
CW…….
………one thing seems to be certain where Julian Assange is concerned…….if he is brought out of the prison for ANY reason he will immediately have a target attached to him………and I would bet that he would be DEAD in less than 24 hours. It is my belief that Podesta already has a contract out on Assange, and I would also bet that it has a value in 6 figures. This is how the DEMOCRATIC BASTARDS do business.
Ty Clevenger:
“So why would a “street robbery” investigation need to be classified?”
Speaks volumes
CW…….
……….in truth the DEMOCRATS are a Mafia type of organization. For a very long time the New York Mafia families were tied to the DEMOCRATIC party. This goes back into the years prior to WW2. In those days the New York political organization was referred to as TAMMANY HALL. All of the organized crime groups had ties with Tammany Hall. That is how they survived!!!!!!
AND…….
………….you can be sure that the TERRAPIN, and his siblings are products of the old Tammany Hall MURDER INCORPORATED. REAL BASTARDS.
YES……..
……….it SPEAKS VOLUMES !!! Assange’s life is not worth a plugged nickel if he is brought anywhere near the public. He is comparatively safe as long as he is kept in the bowels of the high security prison. IN TRUTH he really isn’t even safe there……..perhaps just a little safer.!!!! Sooner or later he will be DISPOSED of. The stinking CRIMINAL SLIME in the world can even ooze through tiny cracks in the prison concrete.
SETH RICH………
………..was murdered as a reprisal for his misadventure of hacking the DNC computers. Somehow the TERRAPIN and his sneaking associates quickly figured out who was responsible for the massive theft of classified DNC files. He allegedly publicly stated that he had NO PROBLEM with teaching Rich a lesson. When the TERRAPIN said those words it became the command to WHACK Rich. The TERRAPIN along with his STINKING CRIMINAL FRIENDS WILL ALL eventually PAY THE FIDDLER. REAL BASTARDS. Even Whitey Bulger did not do some of the sort of crimes the TERRAPIN is capable of committing. The TERRAPIN is a TRUE PIECE OF SH-T.
AND…….
……….Betty BOOP lost the election, because she came to be seen as the same sort of CRAP as the New York Mafia slimes.