Obama college records, Obama campaign contributions, Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, US Constitution, Saudi contributions, Harvard and Columbia paid for by Saudis

 Why has Obama employed a legion of private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?…Citizen Wells and millions of Americans

To anyone who has an agenda, is simple minded, not paying attention or does not care, including, but not limited to, Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck. Obama’s eligibility issues, his intentional withholding of a legitimate birth certificate, college records and other records from his past and his decision to not receive federal matching election funds are all tied up in a web of deception. One cannot refer to one dubious aspect of Obama’s secrecy without bringing to light another. So it is with the hidden birth certificate. Much has been made about the significance of this fact. For people like Glenn Beck, who preach adherance to the US Constitution out of one side of their mouth while insulting concerned Americans who question Obama’s eligibility out of the other. For people like Beck who appear to be either hypocritical or doing the bidding of the Saudis via their ownership of Fox, I am going to make this real simple.

Why has Obama kept hidden his college records?

It is a certainty that the Saudis played a large role in Obama’s education. Just how much? We will be reopening that can of worms. But first let’s revisit contributions to Obama’s presidential campaign and why Obama chose to not receive federal matching funds.

From NewsMax, September 29, 2008.

“Secret, Foreign Money Floods Into Obama Campaign”

“More than half of the whopping $426.9 million Barack Obama has raised has come from small donors whose names the Obama campaign won’t disclose.

And questions have arisen about millions more in foreign donations the Obama campaign has received that apparently have not been vetted as legitimate.

Obama has raised nearly twice that of John McCain’s campaign, according to new campaign finance report.

But because of Obama’s high expenses during the hotly contested Democratic primary season and an early decision to forgo public campaign money and the spending limits it imposes, all that cash has not translated into a financial advantage — at least, not yet.

The Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee began September with $95 million in cash, according to reports filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

The McCain camp and the Republican National Committee had $94 million, because of an influx of $84 million in public money.

But Obama easily could outpace McCain by $50 million to $100 million or more in new donations before Election Day, thanks to a legion of small contributors whose names and addresses have been kept secret.

Unlike the McCain campaign, which has made its complete donor database available online, the Obama campaign has not identified donors for nearly half the amount he has raised, according to the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP).

Federal law does not require the campaigns to identify donors who give less than $200 during the election cycle. However, it does require that campaigns calculate running totals for each donor and report them once they go beyond the $200 mark.

Surprisingly, the great majority of Obama donors never break the $200 threshold.

“Contributions that come under $200 aggregated per person are not listed,” said Bob Biersack, a spokesman for the FEC. “They don’t appear anywhere, so there’s no way of knowing who they are.”

The FEC breakdown of the Obama campaign has identified a staggering $222.7 million as coming from contributions of $200 or less. Only $39.6 million of that amount comes from donors the Obama campaign has identified.

It is the largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the U.S. election system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reforms of 2002.”

Read more:

http://newsmax.com/Politics/Obama-fundraising-illegal/2008/09/29/id/325630

REPORT OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS

By An Authorized Committee of a
Candidate For the Office of President or Vice President
(Summary Page, FEC FORM 3P)

FILING FEC-405794


1. OBAMA FOR AMERICA

      PO Box 8102
      Chicago, Illinois   60680

2. FEC Committee ID #: C00431445

3. This report contains activity for a General Election

4. Report Type: Pre-General

This IS an amended REPORT

Filed 02/27/2009 

REPORT OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS

By An Authorized Committee of a
Candidate For the Office of President or Vice President
(Summary Page, FEC FORM 3P)

FILING FEC-405794


1. OBAMA FOR AMERICA

      PO Box 8102
      Chicago, Illinois   60680

2. FEC Committee ID #: C00431445

3. This report contains activity for a General Election

4. Report Type: Pre-General

This IS an amended REPORT

Filed 02/27/2009

SUMMARY

5. Covering Period 10/01/2008 Through 10/15/2008

6. Cash on Hand at BEGINNING of the Reporting Period   135,560,349.00
7. Total Receipts This Period   39,026,983.95
8. Subtotal (6 + 7)   174,587,332.95
9. Total Disbursements This Period   105,599,963.76
10. Cash on Hand at CLOSE of the Reporting Period   68,987,369.19
11. Debts and Obligations Owed TO the Committee   0.00
    Itemize all on SCHEDULE C or SCHEDULE D
12. Debts and Obligations Owed BY the Committee   2,302,457.50
    Itemize all on SCHEDULE C or SCHEDULE D
13. Expenditures Subject To Limitation   0.00
14. NET Contributions (Other than Loans)   582,402,895.62
15. NET Operating Expenditures   547,640,218.12

Treasurer: Martin H. Nesbitt
Date Signed: 02/27/2009

(End Summary, FEC FORM 3P)

 

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2008/12G/C00431445.html#SUMMARY

Let’s revisit a Pastor James Manning video.

Glenn Beck, O’Reilly and others who pretend to cover important news, the eligibility issue is either above your comprehension level or US Constitution adherance level or you are purposely avoiding or denigrating it for some agenda. So here it is, simple enough for a third grader.

Why has Obama employed countless attorneys to avoid presenting his college records?

Stay tuned. More to come.

186 responses to “Obama college records, Obama campaign contributions, Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly, US Constitution, Saudi contributions, Harvard and Columbia paid for by Saudis

  1. Obama seeks power to Assassinate “US Citizens” they label as terrorist

    They want the power to assassinate US citizens the call terrorist, when they cannot even get the names right to begin with. 5 year olds on no fly list as terrorist

  2. You decide

    Is Our ‘Debtor Nation’ Status Past the Point of No Return?

    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/02/01/decide-debtor-nation-status-budget-trillion/

  3. Fmr CIA Op: Obama Aides Are “Nothing But Buffoons When It Comes to National Security of this Nation”

  4. Watching Glenn Beck now. Why is he defending secret Swiss bank accounts for UBS? They have been a haven for the most elitists of the elitists. 4500 U.S. citizens have their money hidden there to evade taxes.

  5. I know – he is using reverse psychology!!

  6. No, no, a huge no, to this from article’s paragraph #3: “It is a certainty that the Saudis played a large role in Obama’s education”

    When we’re wrong about any allegation, such as this, then we won’t be believed, rather will be brushed off as conspiracy nuts, about true allegations. Please don’t spread the Saudis-paid-for school myth, & stick to the almost certain foreigners raised money for campaign assertion, for which there is evidence.

  7. don in california

    What is going on??? Kirk is STILL voting in the senate.

  8. LM @ 5:11 pm
    All of the professionals in the CIA, other government agencies involved in protecting our country must be horrified in how this administration is treating terrorists/murderers and in some cases attempted murderers. Not only is the Obama administration endangering their lives, all the people under their command but they are endangering all the people of the United States of America who coincidentally pay their salaries, obviously for no services rendered. So much hard earned experience gone to waste. Obama’s idea of defense of the nation must be– do you feel lucky?

  9. don in california @ 5:40 pm
    How could Kirk’s vote be legal? Defacto vote?

  10. So ER,
    Why do you believe that the Saudis playing a role in BO’s
    education is a myth?

  11. don in california

    Michelle // February 1, 2010 at 5:46 pm
    —————–
    I don’t know. I was watching c-span vote and kirk was still voting. I just DON’T understand how that is legal.

  12. “[ELIGIBILITY] That’s the elephant in the room… Until you [GLENN BECK] address that, you’re not addressing what’s really going on in [OBAMERIKA] that country.”

    THE STONING OF [AMERICA] SORAYA M.

    Stone cold [in OBAMERIKA]
    http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1260930887300&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

    …The film …tells the true story of the stoning death of a woman in a rural area of Iran in the Mid-1980s.

    …Soraya, was murdered the day before by the men in her village. In their justice system, she was found guilty of adultery and was given the punishment: death by stoning. This would be awful enough, if it were true. But Zahra tells a far more complicated story. Soraya’s husband, Ali, wanted to divorce her and marry a 14-year-old girl (he gets the girl’s parents’ permission for the match because her father has been accused of a crime and Ali promises to get him out of jail). But Soraya must agree to a not-very-generous offer of support for her and her four children that Ali proposes and she refuses. The mullah comes to her, trying to bully her into taking it, and offers another incentive – she can become his mistress by a loophole called temporary marriage and he will help support her.

    She is disgusted by this and tells off the cleric. Her enraged husband [USURPER] now has the support of the local religious authority [CONGRESS], and they persuade the mayor that she [AMERICA] must be found guilty of a crime…

    Now the die is cast. No appeal is possible, and no one listens to her [THE TRUTH]. The last third of the film is an excruciating account of the stoning. She [AMERICA] is buried up to the waist, and all the village boys [GLENN BECK] are enlisted to find stones [RIDICULING THE TRUTH] that are big enough to hurt her but not so big that they will kill her quickly. Soraya’s father and her sons are encouraged, virtually ordered, to hurl some of the first stones. Of course, her husband [USURPER] is the most eager participant…

    “…All the men [NANCY PELOSI, HARRY REID, BARACK OBAMA] in the village really were cheering as they [GLENN BECK] stoned her [RIDICULED THE TRUTH]. My responsibility is to tell this story as honestly and truthfully as I can.”

    What is most fascinating in the film are the details of how ordinary men [GLENN BECK] become complicit in the ghastly murder of a blameless woman [AMERICA] whom they have known their entire lives. “It’s very much about mob rule. The husband [USURPER] is ruthless, but the mayor [GLENN BECK] is conflicted… There is plenty of questioning going on, but there’s no moment when someone [GLENN BECK] steps up and says, ‘We’re not going to do this.’”

    …Zahra, the victim’s aunt, fights for her niece. “She’s passionate about seeking justice, but she doesn’t have power,” said the director. At one point, as the men in the village try to stop the journalist from leaving with a tape of his interview with Zahra about the killing, she taunts them, saying, “If everything was according to Islam, why are you worried that word will get out?”

    … the issue of the grotesque human-rights abuses against women (and, often, against men accused of homosexuality), including and especially stoning, which, until 2002, was sanctioned by the country’s legal code and continues to this day according to many reports, has been conspicuously absent on screen.

    “[ELIGIBILITY] That’s the elephant in the room,” said Nowrasteh, and noted that cast members got messages from family and friends in Iran about stonings that had taken place during filming. “Until you [GLENN BECK] address that, you’re not addressing what’s really going on in [OBAMERIKA] that country.”

  13. For The Village Boy Glenn Beck: Ask the Right Question…

    The Constitution of the United States – Does it matter?

  14. Jacqlyn Smith

    #

    citizenwells // February 1, 2010 at 5:50 pm

    So ER,
    Why do you believe that the Saudis playing a role in BO’s
    education is a myth?
    *****************************************

    Yeah….I’d like to hear that answer too!!! Who is ER….don’t recall that person posting before???

  15. Hey Don and Michelle,

    Wondering the same thing.

    Kirk’s term expired on election day, 1/19. WHY IS HE STILL VOTING AND WHY ISN’T THE RNC MAKING A STINK?

    Seat Scott NOW!!!!

  16. SueK @ 6:09 pm
    Did you ever get the feeling that since Obama usurped the Constitution, no laws no longer apply? except maybe IRS, so that these fools can still get a paycheck for doing absolutely nothing except screw up a one car funeral.

  17. More treason by the usurper wanting to kill US citizens who he deems as terrorists. He is a terrorist himself.

  18. They want to kill US citizens, but they cant bring themselves to do it to real terrorists

  19. yeah ER – what gives? we’d appreciate an answer BUT more importantly cite your sources. Don’t just come back with a bs opinion. FACTS. FACTS. FACTS. support your claim with the FACTS.

  20. Why Would Obama CAIR to Bow To Tampa Mayor?

    Answer: Tampa Mayor bowed to CAIR in 2008, 2007, 2006

    Tampa Mayor Proclamation 11/15/2008

    Council On American – Islamic Relations CAIR Day
    http://www.tampagov.net/dept_Mayor/proclamations_and_special_recognitions/index.asp?m=11&y=2008

    Tampa Mayor Proclamation 10/20/2007

    Council On American – Islamic Relations CAIR Day
    http://www.tampagov.net/dept_Mayor/proclamations_and_special_recognitions/index.asp?m=10&y=2007

    Tampa Mayor Proclamation 09/16/2006

    Council On American – Islamic Relations CAIR Day
    http://www.tampagov.net/dept_Mayor/proclamations_and_special_recognitions/index.asp?m=9&y=2006

  21. For the Village Boy Glenn Beck: Do you CAIR?

    Why Would Obama CAIR to Bow To Tampa Mayor?

    Answer: Tampa Mayor bowed to CAIR in 2008, 2007, 2006

    Tampa Mayor Proclamation 11/15/2008

    Council On American – Islamic Relations CAIR Day
    http://www.tampagov.net/dept_Mayor/proclamations_and_special_recognitions/index.asp?m=11&y=2008

    Tampa Mayor Proclamation 10/20/2007

    Council On American – Islamic Relations CAIR Day
    http://www.tampagov.net/dept_Mayor/proclamations_and_special_recognitions/index.asp?m=10&y=2007

    Tampa Mayor Proclamation 09/16/2006

    Council On American – Islamic Relations CAIR Day
    http://www.tampagov.net/dept_Mayor/proclamations_and_special_recognitions/index.asp?m=9&y=2006

  22. truthbetold11

    We truly are a nation of cowards. but this is by design folks. they want us to fail. obama bowing the other day was on purpose he is a puppet for the new world order

  23. Cair has not obeyed US law by avoiding filing tax returns for 2 years! A non-profit ……..hiding something!

    If all those associated with Steve would just pay their taxes, it would help! Congress should audit all! Yeah right

  24. SueK // February 1, 2010 at 6:09 pm
    Hey Don and Michelle,
    Wondering the same thing.
    Kirk’s term expired on election day, 1/19. WHY IS HE STILL VOTING AND WHY ISN’T THE RNC MAKING A STINK?
    Seat Scott NOW!!!!
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    We all need to fax or email our spineless Senators and ask why a duly elected Senator has not been sworn in and his predecessor has been illegally casting votes?

    If the results are decided by one vote shouldn’t this make process null and void?

    http://www.congress.org/congressorg/directory/congdir.tt

  25. ms helga

    Glenn beck defends the Swiss banks becaue that is where his money is.

  26. Napolitano confident in Super Bowl security measures

    US Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano gave an unprecedented seal of approval to Super Bowl safety measures on Monday after a stadium tour and a detailed look at preparations for Sunday’s game.

    “I didn’t have any (advice) to give [to the jihadists],” Napolitano said. “They looked well prepared for the game. It all looked fine to me.”

  27. truthbetold11

    bold face corruption but if we don’y pay our taxes we go to jail go figure. powerful men with evil intent

  28. Jacqlyn Smith

    I know this will make some of you happy here….Sarah Palin is endorsing Rand Paul in his race for the Senate in Kentucky…..I think JJ is from Kentucky and a big Paul fan…..looks like Palin knows what she is doing!!!

  29. JS – if Sarah knew what she was doing she would not be campaigning for progressive McCain. If she knew what she was doing she would not allow herself to be played by Rothschild. Just saying.

  30. Benaiah, @5:56 Great video, terrific ending.

  31. Don @5:56, great video, will forward to inform others.

  32. Jacqlyn Smith

    #

    d2i // February 1, 2010 at 7:06 pm

    JS – if Sarah knew what she was doing she would not be campaigning for progressive McCain. If she knew what she was doing she would not allow herself to be played by Rothschild. Just saying.
    (((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

    d2i……that’s your opinion……She is supporting McCain as a favor to him picking her as his running mate and she was supported by the Rothchild’s only after the DemoCRAP party left them!!! I was at the rally when the Rothchild woman endorsed her as VP…..Mrs. Rothchild made it very clear that she could no longer be a supporter to such a corrupt party as the DemoCRAPS….so I don’t buy your insinuations that Palin is a sell out to America!

  33. truthbetold11

    The rules of endorsement. always help those who endorse you. if you dont it like cheating on oyur spouse. its a unwritten code. So Sarah must honor it and Scott as well, even though their heart might not be there 100 percent, its just the nature of the way its done.

  34. Hello, d2i,

    You make interesting points on Palin. I, as were others, taken aback by her in the beginning. However, we all know by now nothing happens in politics, especially the presidential race, by happenstance. She may have seemingly come out of nowhere, but I have my doubts now that was the case. I also was skeptical when news of Greta’s husband “managing” her emerged.

    I, personally, remain healthily skeptical about the portrayal of the promise of her. Especially knowing that even she knows Obama’s healthcare bill is a GLOBAL healthcare that the American taxpayers will fund. It it now public knowledge global healthcare – spreading the wealth WORLDWIDE – it is a critical part of his new foreign policy. That’s why Pelosi has stated she’ll parachute it in if necessary.

  35. Atta girl Jacqlyn, your answer is totally right about Palin!!!

  36. bob strauss // February 1, 2010 at 7:08 pm

    Thanks.. But, zeeshopper deserves all the credit…

  37. Atta girl Jacqlyn, Couldn’t have said it better. It’s time we have human candidates and not robots. I personally think Sara is a true American and will not be led around by anyone. I myself have friends that I don”t agree with 100% of the time but I’m still loyal to them. Go Sara Palin.

  38. Glenn … Are You Listening? Another Open Letter to Glenn Beck …

    http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/glenn-are-you-listening-another-open.html

  39. Copied over from the previous thread

    Maria // February 1, 2010 at 7:35 pm

    tennbrock // February 1, 2010 at 3:39 pm

    Regarding citizenship, my parents both immigrated here from Holland. My brothers, sister and I were all then born as possible dual citizens. Holland & US, none of us took on our Dutch citizen status, though, my sister said we would have to renounce our US citizenship. When I married my husband, an American citizenship I lost any ability to claim Dutch citizenship. My brother married a Dutch girl, took a long time for her to get her paperwork to move here legally. Now their kids would possibly be able to claim dual citizenship. Long story short I’ve known since elementary school that we wouldn’t be considered natural born citizens.
    ………………………………………………….

    Interesting. You and I are possibly the only people following CW’s blog whose own family members would be affected.

    I’m not comfortable giving up my children’s USA NBC status as you seem to be. Perhaps I read you wrong. Any chance you could clarify?

  40. JS – be careful who you come out for early in the game. The Rothschild’s own Britian and the UN. I could give a rip what she said at the rally you attended. She started a blog for Sarah following the election of oblahblah! The Rothchild’s need their own pretending to be R’s in power. They’ve been fighting against the Rockefeller’s for ages. I lost some hope for Sarah when she unwittingly allowed herself to be used by the likes of Lady Rothchild. And now that she’s campaigning for a RINO, a guy that was ineligible to even run for the US Presidendy tells me a lot more about where here loyalties lie. You may wish to support her BUT you will rudely awakened if she ever claims the mantle.

    Just be careful. That’s all I’m saying. Watch her politics over the next year or so. Hell, she’s even trying to move the INDEPENDENT Tea Party over to the Republican column b/c their base has abandoned them. They will abandon the Tea Party if they align choose to align themselves with one Party or the other. This woman is showing her loyalties right now. So pay attention and be wise.

  41. Maria, No I would not let my kids lose their NBC status. I was saying that my nephews would possibly be able to take their Dutch status as their mother is from Holland. I don’t think it would happen, just saying possible.

  42. Thanks, Just Me. Maintaining a healthy skepticism for anyone right now is the wise thing to do. It’s too early. And I don’t like the game she’s playing. She may feel a need to support McCain but this man has no business being re elected. NONE. We talk here about cleaning up DC. Well, McCain is part of the problem in DC. So why would we support him over the opponent who is more aligned with our platform than McCain is? I don’t get it. Just b/c you like someone doesn’t make them honest, credible or righteous. It just means you like them. When it comes to politics though, you have to watch and weigh everything they do. I think it stinks she’s campaigning for McCain. It’s a stupid move on her part and Scott Brown’s. Maybe they have to do it, but that doesn’t excuse them as far as I’m concerned. No is a word that is the dictionary even today. So use it. Especially when it comes to your own ambitions and your own self preservation!

  43. Now we know why the US is invading Yemen.

    But they needed a boogie man (underwear bomber) to gain public support, and it looks like Daddy Warbucks just sold them one.

    http://www.dailypaul.com/node/123561

  44. d2i,

    Hell, she’s even trying to move the INDEPENDENT Tea Party over to the Republican column b/c their base has abandoned them. They will abandon the Tea Party if they align choose to align themselves with one Party or the other.

    /////

    Very interesting…

    If our eyes are always wide open, it’s all there for us to see.

  45. Ah, I get you now, tennbrock. Thank you for that.

    My kids are American, but I’m not. Only one of my children could be affected by this issue.

    I hope you don’t mind me asking, but do you know what your brother’s understanding is, regarding his children’s status. I mean, does he regard his children as NBC’s

  46. Republicans are not complaining about the seating of Scott Brown because they want to “save their ammunition” for bigger fights. So far, Kirk is not hurting anything. I’m sure the situation is being watched carefully. In a few days Scott will be seated. No stink, no fuss, no muss.

  47. The South,

    So the big “terrorist” plot here is to get a small amount of PETN onboard a plane and then SIT ON IT, thus absorbing the relatively small explosion… with his ass and his 150lb body?

    //////

    Great article. The usual suspects are involved. Big Surprise.

    There was a big deal made about the “explosive” material used. Well…as this story indicates it would not have done anything more than a firecracker. Now, add to that he had relieved himself prior to “setting it off” – and you have an even less bang. The amount of PETN he was sitting on wouldn’t have done any major damage to the plane much less to his private parts.

  48. Maria, no I don’t mind you asking at all. I’ve never actually asked my brother what he thought about his kids status, they would not be NBC though. I think he knows that because of our status. My whole immediate family does know what NBC means, constitutionally, because no one believes BO is elegible to be Pres.

  49. JustMe, correctomundo!

    Not to count the underwear bomber was escorted onto the plane by a CIA agent.

    Don’t worry about his papers, we do this all the time?

    Yeah, okay.

  50. Jacqlyn Smith // February 1, 2010 at 7:17 pm

    d2i // February 1, 2010 at 7:06 pm

    JS – if Sarah knew what she was doing she would not be campaigning for progressive McCain. If she knew what she was doing she would not allow herself to be played by Rothschild. Just saying.
    (((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

    d2i……that’s your opinion……She is supporting McCain as a favor to him picking her as his running mate and she was supported by the Rothchild’s only after the DemoCRAP party left them!!! I was at the rally when the Rothchild woman endorsed her as VP…..Mrs. Rothchild made it very clear that she could no longer be a supporter to such a corrupt party as the DemoCRAPS….so I don’t buy your insinuations that Palin is a sell out to America!
    ******************************
    Over the last 18 months many have had to choose to walk away from friends or family because they had to decide which came first: country or friends/family. Palin chose friendship/debt by supporting McCain. McCain is no patriot. He is just another politician.

  51. Medina booked for Thursday on Freedom Watch
    with Judge Napolitano !!!!!!!!!!

    Contact Glenn Beck to get Medina on his show!

    If he’s a Constitutionalist like he says he is, he should be jumping all over this.

    Glenn Beck = me@glennbeck.com

    Stu = stu@glennbeck.com

    You guys know what to do, lets put some pressure on Beck!

  52. Debra Medina booked for Freedom Watch on Thursday with the Judge.

    http://www.dailypaul.com/node/123594

  53. Carlyle // February 1, 2010 at 8:01 pm

    Hi Carlyle,

    I understand your point, but that’s not my point.

    This jackass’ term ended on 1/19; he is no longer the interim Senator from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts as of that date.

    In effect, we only have *one* Senator right now and unfortunately, that’s John ‘Lurch’ Kerry.

    We have a new Junior Senator, Scott Brown, who’s yet to be sworn in, and Kirk needs to get his azz back to MA to continue schmoozing with the sh*t for brains Kennedy bunch.

    He’s done. Finished. He needs to vacate the premises in Washington *immediately!*

    The Dems in this pathetic state shot themselves in the foot when they changed the law to allow Cadillac Deval Patrick, our less-than-illustrious Governor, to appoint an interim Senator; something that Mitt Romney never could do. If they had left it alone and had a quickie special election, Coakley would’ve won. By doing what they did, they got more than they bargained for, and his name is Scott Brown. Senator Scott Brown.

    SEAT HIM!

    I plan to call a friend tomorrow whose boss will be running in the Lt. Gov. slot (R) come November to try to unseat Patrick. I will ask her why Scott hasn’t been seated yet and why the hell Kirk is still there. Illegally.

  54. Thanks, Tennbrock, for your reply.

    If you ever do get a chance to ask your brother, though, I would be very interested to hear his opinion on this.

  55. The South,

    Thanks for the heads up on Medina. I will definitely tune in. She was on Alex’s show Sunday and he put her on the spot about continuing the fight against the NWO agenda. She vowed to fight against it to the end.

    It sure looks like she is a force to be reckoned with and the has beens, Perry and Hutchison will have to spend, spend, spend to stay in the race.

  56. Sounds as if Maria learned the definition of NBC in elementary school. How so odd?

  57. JustMe,

    Yep, Debra Medina is the real deal! I guarantee the powers that be are working DOUBLE and TRIPLE time to keep her from getting elected.

    If she gets elected instead of Perry, the Texas Corridor will be toast, and all property taxes in Texas will be toast.

    She is on to the NWO and their scheme to rip this country apart, and I’m behind her 100%.

    Medina for Texas Governor !!!!!!!!!!!

  58. What is Freedom Watch…Is it on Fox Cable or an internet site

  59. Me think Sarah Palin knows the fate of John McCain is in the hands of the voters of Arizona.

    After McCain, lets see who she chooses to support.

  60. So, it is a podcast to be viewed via internet??? or is it television program?

  61. Rocknee – yes, McCain will likely lose the primary. Although I voted for him and Palin, it’s time for him and the other dinosasurs to re enter public life. It will be interesting indeed to see who she supports following the primary. Loyalty or not, I find it troubling that she’s stumping for him and that Brown is making robo calls. Sorry.

    If we’re true to our word then all must go including McCain.

  62. HonorFirst,

    It’s an internet show, but I haven’t watched it in awhile, so you’ll have to do some research on that site as to exact instructions.

  63. Linda from NY

    Prairie: This one’s for you!

    Pole-Dancer/Pole-vaulter/Polluter

    What is it Nance that you don’t comprehend?
    About Health Care and what we want to spend?
    How is it Nance you will not cease and desist?
    And leave our HC intact; you just cannot resist!

    Says Nance we’ll pass HCR one way or another,
    I’m telling you father, mother, sister, and brother,
    We’ll tweak it and squeak it until we pass it I say,
    Over and around and pass it through some day!

    Across the finish line, we’ll pole vault I bet,
    Because HCR is what you’re gonna get,
    Like it or not, we will pass HC reform,
    By hook or by crook cause it’s our platform!

    For over a year, we watched on the sidelines,
    As back room deals produced HC guidelines,
    We protested and voted our intentions in MA,
    We did all we could to make known we won’t pay!

    At the Dem Caucus, Nance pole-danced around,
    While we believed our hope was in Brown,
    The next thing we knew she broke it in pieces,
    We all know her arrogance never ceases!

    Picture her pole-dancing for the Dem Caucus,
    Picture her pole-vaulting across the finish line,
    Then, picture her creating a front-page ruckus,
    As each part of her facade readjusts by design.

    We will work diligently for Election 2010,
    We will work hard for the country we defend,
    We will party in victory with each race we win,
    Then, we’ll rocket-propel Nance to the trash bin!

    Linda

  64. The South & Honor First,

    Here’s the link I have for The Judge….

    http://freedomwatchonfox.com/

  65. TO:

    Maria // February 1, 2010 at 8:31 pm

    Thanks, Tennbrock, for your reply.

    If you ever do get a chance to ask your brother, though, I would be very interested to hear his opinion on this.
    \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ////////////

    If you both Parents are not citizens at the time of Birth Child is NOT NBC.

  66. d2i

    My understanding is she plans to make a couple appearances for him. Hopefully not spend a lot of time in AZ.

    My looking ahead to 2013,Jan 20th. Pres. Palin gives an address unlike any before, ever. She tells us and the world how America will return to greatness today and this is what gonna take place starting in one hour.

    Be nice, ah!

  67. That’s it??

    My household budget has more info than that!!!

  68. PALIN
    We have a PAL in PALIN.

    Sarah did not asscociate with Rothchild, Rothchild supported McCain/Palin…what was Sarah supposed to do Resign the VP nomination because a former Hillary Supporter decided to support McCain and Her vs O’Blahblah?

    Lets be realistic here she had no choice in teh matter of Rothchild.

    As for supporting McCain she endorsed him before anyone else was running….she did it to show that she is above pretty BS. He wouldn;t endorse her and she was the bigger person adn endorsed him. It is s smart move on her part…now if she sees a more conservative person with a great chance to win like J D Heyworth she may support him also.

    You Hillary Ladies hate Palin we know that…but don’t let you anger blind you…she is a CAPABLE CANDIDATE no need to HATE.

    We have a Pal in PALIN.

  69. truthbetold11 // February 1, 2010 at 6:43 pm

    We truly are a nation of cowards. but this is by design folks. they want us to fail. obama bowing the other day was on purpose he is a puppet for the new world order
    ——————-
    I have another theory…..the more ridiculous and snarky his behavior, the more he pizzes off the people of this nation…….that’s what this bast**d lives for.

  70. Rocknee – that would be a geat speech by anyone who had a record for walking their talk. Words mean little…actions mean much. I await her actions.

  71. truthbetold11

    JJ right on right on!!! I was burning mad about what obama is purposely doing to us. no one with any common sense would do all this stuff. He loves it. He must wake loving being a radical destroying americas sovreignity. Wheres the other countries coming to our rescue? We help them for many years. We must stand up and fight this communist take over

  72. Peter, I don’t hate Palin. Far from it. I voted for her NOT McCain.

    Yes, I’m a former Hill Dem, but that has nothing to do with my healthy skepticism toward Sarah and any other individual who has the potential to run in 2012.

    I do not like the fact that she is stumping for a guy who himself was ineligible to run for POTUS

    I do not like the fact that she is working to splinter the Tea Party movement and neither do Tea Partiers.

    I do not like the fact that Rothchild is anywhere near her. Let alone a Rockefeller.

    Thus, I’m simply keeping score on her and several others. That simple. It has nothing to do with the personal but everything to do with politics. So don’t take my skepticism or anyone elseses personally. We’re not going to support anyone unless the tow the line and support 100% of what we want. That simple.

  73. d2i tbt11,

    Whats in this for Bush Sr. and Clintons. Bush Sr can’t even walk anymore, jumped outta too many planes. GW not his favorite, must be Jeb.

    Are they in charged or under control of someone else?

  74. Linda in Ny,
    You have me smiling from ear to ear. I so love your poems and your style. Glad you got to voppin’ today- there is always lots to vop about here. You truly made my night, thank you. With your permission, I would like to print it and ad it to my personal “Barky is an usurper” journal. I’ll be chuckling in my sleep about the pole dancing line.

  75. d2i // February 1, 2010 at 7:43 pm

    The reason I’m cautious and playing the waiting game with the Rothschild/Palin event???

    “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer” could be Rothschild’s theme here……..or maybe even Palin’s!!!!!!!

  76. d2i,

    Sarah knows a third party can not win the POTUS slot. She will need all the votes she can get, you know that is true. My opinion!

  77. d2i,

    We’re not going to support anyone unless the tow the line and support 100% of what we want. That simple.

    //////////

    DITTO! I, personally, was never a Hillary supporter. The only reason I voted for McCain was because of Palin. What were our choices?

    d2i, I know you understand the basic principles of marketing.

    These people/politicians are being marketed to us just as a product or service is. I can guarantee you they know more about us than we do them at this point. And, they are exploiting all the avenues available to them to rope in the masses.

  78. Just got home from visiting a friend with direct connections to Haiti. Reports of mass corruption with aid as we all know. Also states that up to 3,000 relief workers are being kept for days in the U.S. embassy and have not been able to see, touch, or help one Haitian person. They are all sitting, being held, in the embassy in groups of colored shirts according to affiliations.

  79. Linda from NY // February 1, 2010 at 9:06 pm

    Geeze, Linda(r)…you put my pole-dancing comment in there, didn’t ya?

    🙂 🙂 🙂 🙂

    Good one!

  80. We truly are a nation of cowards. but this is by design folks. they want us to fail. obama bowing the other day was on purpose he is a puppet for the new world order
    ——————-
    I have another theory…..the more ridiculous and snarky his behavior, the more he pizzes off the people of this nation…….that’s what this bast**d lives for.
    ____________________
    truthbetold11 // February 1, 2010 at 9:33 pm

    JJ right on right on!!! I was burning mad about what obama is purposely doing to us. no one with any common sense would do all this stuff. He loves it. He must wake loving being a radical destroying americas sovreignity. Wheres the other countries coming to our rescue? We help them for many years. We must stand up and fight this communist take over
    ______________________

    I envision Moochelle and aka Obama dining each night and discussing how many ways they made the news each day and counting/discussing the ways they got one up on ‘whitey’ by acting racial, stupid, and spending the nation’s money!!!

  81. I was certainly not a HRC supporter, and voted for McCain/Palin because of Palin and AGAINST Obama!!!!
    But watch what she’s doing. She is also supporting Perry in Texas, isn’t she?
    The time for blind acceptance with anyone in government is over. Question everything and everybody.

  82. Prairie @ 9:45 pm
    with all these folks on the ground, do they not know that word is going to come back, especially since these people volunteered to go there to help and they are not allowed to. We are playing close attention to what the reporters and all these groups have to say since they are eye-witnesses and there are a lot of them.

  83. TO:

    d2i // February 1, 2010 at 9:35 pm

    Peter, I don’t hate Palin. Far from it. I voted for her NOT McCain.

    Yes, I’m a former Hill Dem, but that has nothing to do with my healthy skepticism toward Sarah and any other individual who has the potential to run in 2012.

    \\\\\\\\\\ ///////////////

    I think you are still infected with Lieberalism and it is affecting how you see things with a lieberal prism.

    What Palin is saying about Tea Parties is spot on…she is saying that tea parties should join up with teh Republican party “take it over” and work within it to make it more CONSERVATIVE which is the right strategy to effect change within a system that is already setup and to ride the wave of change especially since they are on the run and will listen on the Tea Party successes of the last 3 big election wins.

    It is the RIGHT MOVE and SMART….don;t leave the Party….get rid of the RINOS and drag the Party to the Right with Common Sense Conservatism.

    Palin is RIGHT ON.
    We have a Pal in PALIN

  84. Michelle,
    The Haiti mess, the backroom deals, the constitution- they just don’t care that we know. The latest bow to CAIR! The horror stories I heard of Haiti tonight have made me ill.

  85. Rocknee // February 1, 2010 at 9:43 pm

    d2i,

    Sarah knows a third party can not win the POTUS slot. She will need all the votes she can get, you know that is true. My opinion!
    —————-

    You know, I think all this third party talk actually hurts both parties…….if the independents go with a tea party candidate, then that only helps the dems the way I see it…….uh, like 2008.

    I know dems stole the election with illegal voting machines, and there weren’t enough unaffiliated voters to make a difference after the illegal vote counting……..but if it was done legally, they may make a difference 2010 and 2012.

  86. And what about Fox News AKA Saudi Central? I hardly watch tv anymore. Every time I turn on Fox there is Newt Gingrich lying his CFR NWO a** off.
    And O’Reilly and Beck touring together…what is THAT?

  87. PRWH, if Sarah Palin wants us to get rid of the RINO’s, then why is she supporting them?

  88. Kim // February 1, 2010 at 10:08 pm

    It’s called ‘ratings’ Kim…ratings.

    That’s all.

  89. SueK, you’re right, but they aren’t getting their ratings from me anymore.
    Sigh.
    I get so mad when Republicans turn a blind eye to the corruption in their party. Like it’s just the dems that are so bad. It’s reverse sheeple-itis.

  90. Rocknee,

    If you’re still on, I answered your question this morning. In case you missed it, here it is:

    &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

    Rocknee // January 31, 2010 at 10:58 pm

    Morning, Rocknee,

    Here are the links to the new research on MS; the original article, and also the Univ. of Buffalo’s link:

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/researchers-labour-of-love-leads-to-ms-breakthrough/article1372414/

    http://www.buffalo.edu/news/10562

    Please feel free to send the info around!

  91. Courts can remove ineligible chief executive

    Precedent cited in appeal of California challenge to president’s tenure

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123843

  92. TO:
    Kim // February 1, 2010 at 10:11 pm

    PRWH, if Sarah Palin wants us to get rid of the RINO’s, then why is she supporting them?
    \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ////////////////

    Get rid of the RINOs in the Party….it will not happen overnight. An activist wants to change everything but someone like Palin knows that there are limitations and Rome wasn’t built in one day. To achieve your goals you have to have strategy and don’t cut of your nose to spite your face.

    We all want 100% of course that is what we are aiming BUT we have to be realistic and even if we make small steps of progress and not achieve 100% but only get 55% of what we want it is better than getting NOTHING of what we want. We just need to keep advancing to where we need to get to even if it is baby steps.

    Palin knows what she is doing, she is witty and knows how to butter her bread.

    For example in Arizona McCain has his supporters if she supports McCain now and than McCain loses in the primaries and then she endorses lets say JD Heyworth that is a Win, Win for her she gets McCain’s supporters and JD’s supporters. If McCain wins she supported the republican winner who will owe her support. STRATEGY is very important and I believe she is brilliant in her approach.

    If not PALIN who?

    I say Palin 2012 with Michelled Bachman/DeMint or Romney. I prefer the TWO LADIES.

  93. Kim // February 1, 2010 at 10:15 pm

    I know, Kim-that’s why I rarely turn the TV on; local news, weather and traffic in the morning is about all I can take.

    Both parties are crummy, one more so than the other. The Dems are drunk with power, and the Repubs are so disorganized they couldn’t find their way out of a short tunnel with a spotlight at the end.

    I don’t know about you, but I’m tired of voting for ‘the lesser of two evils;’ I’d like to get back to voting *for* the person, rather than *against* someone else.

    If the Repubs are gonna have a chance in 2010, they need to get their crappola together, and do it fast otherwise, it’s back to square one. A good first step would be to get rid of Steele, the head wimp. ‘Leadership’ like his, we don’t need. The Repubs will crash and burn if he remains chief cook and bottle washer at the RNC. The man is useless.

  94. The republican Party will be the First to elect a Woman President and a Woman Vice President.

    It will be a Historical Election

    Palin/Bachmann 2012

  95. Enemies of Free Speech Call for Internet Licensing

    “Craig Mundie, chief research and strategy officer for Microsoft, told fellow globalists at the summit that the Internet needed to be policed by means of introducing licenses similar to drivers licenses – in other words government permission to use the web.”

    http://www.infowars.com/enemies-of-free-speech-call-for-internet-licensing/

  96. SueK

    Tks, got it this morning and forward it on.

  97. TO:

    SueK // February 1, 2010 at 10:24 pm

    Kim // February 1, 2010 at 10:15 pm
    \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ////////////////

    Romney has had great success with fixing things that is his specialty, Olympics, Bain Capital, Staples…I say get him to Head the GOP and demote Steele to his assitant. Romney can throw his support to Palin and organize the party and drag it to Conservatism and get it organized and kicking ass. Now is the time.

  98. d2i,

    you may find this of interest

    http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=6454

  99. I’m going to answer y’all at one time.

    Who says a third party candidate can’t win? The only ones I ever here this from are partisans – Rs or Ds. Well I say bulltwinkie. If there has ever been a time in our party system history to start a new party it is now.

    yes, I’m fully aware that conservatives want to move the Tea Party into the R rubric but we disenfranchised Ds, libertarians and Indy’s aren’t going to join you. We are unafilliated for a reason. We’re not looking for a new home to dwell in. We are content in the center swinging elections. Therefore, we will not support Rs or Ds a hundred percent of the time and we’ll be right back where were in 2008.

    Sarah is wrong. So are many Rs. The beauty of TPers is that we are former Rs, Ds, Indys, and Libertarians who are fed up with the game as usual. Why on earth would anyone from these backgrounds ever want to join in another party. Our strength is by remaining independent and demanding Rs and Ds to support our platform and if not, oh well, we will do everything in our power to unseat you. That simple.

    Doesn’t have to be more complicated than t his. That’s why I like the movement so much. I like the Rs and Ds talking to each other and agreeing on a platform that represents our mutual interests rather than just one side of the aisle.

  100. Obama bows to the lady Mayor!

    What happened to the firm handshake and the direct look in the eye when greeting someone. I know we taught our boys this as soon as they could talk and communicate. And proudly, they did learn this perfectly. I don’t know, maybe it’s a Southern dea!

    Steve just looks like a whimpy wuss!

  101. Prairie // February 1, 2010 at 9:41 pm

    I’m glad you liked my little poem and that it made you smile “from ear to ear.”

    Of course, you can print it and file it in your special place…after all, she’s “Barky’s Buddy.”

    SueK // February 1, 2010 at 9:46 pm

    Suey…a poet tries to draw on the “insights” [even if they are repulsive] of others. I could just see her doing all sorts of tricks to persuade her little Dem Caucus to see it her way. You are correct, though, that is one visual I could do without, too.

    The other visual is the “realignment by design.” That is her face falling apart from the shock of losing the HCR battle and/or without her daily shot…lol.

    Happy Night to both of you…Linda

  102. d2i,
    So, should our new third party be called Fed Up, or just FU for short? I agree, the donkey and elephant heads must roll.

  103. btw, that’s called power. R’s and Ds working together. I’ve so enjoyed learning from my new friends from the other side of the aisle. I may not always agree with you, but for the most part I do. Those of us who have challenged one another have grown and come to understand that the divisiveness that has separated us eminates from party politics. I like the path I’m on. I like my ideas being challenged by R’s, it stretches me and I learn a side to an argument I otherwise would never have learned being loyal to the D or R Party.

    Gotta go to bed but promise to check in in the morning. Goodnight.

    PS Sue K happy to learn there may be hope for a newbie. Sorry to learn it was a hard day. Positive thoughts are sent your way.

    PSS Maddie, if you’re checking in, how is your mom and dad. prayers are said for you daily.

  104. aahhhh Prairie – if anyone should name the new party it is our resident author. Whatever name you come up with I will support and use forever more.

  105. So what McCain asked her to run with him? Now he’s saying he can’t endorse her because there’s a lot of other talent out there. McCain is a LIAR (Liberal Impersonating A Republican)

    She needs to shoot him the bird, leave FAUX news, and get with the liberty program.

    I see she endorsed Rand Paul today, maybe she’s waking up.

    I’d like to see her get behind someone who really knows the evil empire and how to destroy it, like Ron Paul.

    That would be a dangerous ticket. She’s the pretty face, and he’s the brains. Use her to rally the forces, and let Ron Paul do what he’s been trying to do for 30 years…

    END THE FED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  106. Linda in NY,
    Glad you checked back in. Thanks for the permission, I always check. We may need to co-author a version of “Poetry for the Birther, Teabagger, and Right Wing Terrorists someday.

  107. How about we just have the “HONEST” party. Walk your talk or be gone! If your caught breaking a campaign promise that helped get you elected, the people have the IMMEDIATE right to a recall! I mean companies are sued for false advertising – why not politicians?

  108. TO:
    d2i // February 1, 2010 at 10:34 pm

    I’m going to answer y’all at one time.
    \\\\\\\\\\\\\ //////////////////

    Just so that you know by and large Tea Parties were founded and attended by a majority Conservatives. There were many others from all different backgrounds that especially joined in later and we are glad they did BUT it was mostly a Conservative movement.

    I would love to get a third Party BUT only if it is a Middle Left Third Party…..you guys can go splinter. On our side I want to CHANGE the Republican party to be what it always was a Party fo Conservatism, tradition, family, American Way, etc. We can drag this party to the right where it should always be…If Reagan did it so can we and so can PALIN.

    The best chance there was for a third party was with Ross Perot and it may never happen again.

    Most Americans have a hard enough time knowing what the 2 partie soffer never mind 3 LOL.

    Now you say we shouldn’t support soeone unless they are 100% with us….Conservatives support Palin, who are you supporting in the middle party?

  109. Rocknee // February 1, 2010 at 10:28 pm

    OK, Rocknee, good!

    It’ll probably be a while as they crunch the data, but I’ll post anything that pops up; I’ll be keeping an eye peeled.

    There’s hope.

  110. Peter @ 10:31PM

    Agreed, and I do hope that he’s able to get some ‘higher up’ position in the next administration; what that would be, I don’t know, but he’s great for pulling things together and that’s what we need right now.

    Steele makes me twitchy; I’d love to see Mitt replace him!

  111. TO:

    The South // February 1, 2010 at 10:44 pm
    \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ //////////////////

    Ron Paul is a blowhard of great ideas with no action.

    He should quit CONgress and go on a lecture tour to raise awareness to what he is talkign about as a campaigner he SUX reminds me of Allan Keyes great mind and ideas NO CHARISMA adn UNELECTABLE.

    Ron Paul would be the next president if he had joined with a Congressman and STOOD UP AND OBJECTED to Obama’s Election. He would be a Hero today and maybe the next president…but he is GUTLESS. Just like McCain if he had never left the campaign to go to DC and vote for what the Lieberals and Bushes SUCKED HIM INTO he would be Mr President today. If he didn’t keep defending his Opponent he may have been President too. HE IS GUTLESS TOO.

  112. Peter, you my friend are wrong. I live in one of the most conservative states and can assure you hundreds if not thousands of us conservative Dem’s attended our local TPs, 912 and are currently active within the structure.

    Maybe in your neck of the woods it was started by R conservatives, but in mine, you are sorely wrong.

    goodnight

    Just me – I’ll check that link out in the morning. thanks for thinking of me.

  113. Tea Parties were started by Conservatives that were pissed off about what Bush did and what Lieberals were doing, than later others joined in.

  114. SueK @ 10:24 pm
    The Dems are drunk with power, but they are corrupt and inept beyond belief, that is why us Dems are heading for the Tea Party-Republican. I think the people of the party are smart, decent and honest-they will figure out how to cure what they believe ails their party. I think you are going to see some good people rise up out of Tea Party and Republican party. Keep the faith.

  115. Michelle

    The problem with Most of the Dems that are in office now is that they are PROGRESSIVES!

    Need to yell DANGER, DANGER – AMERICAN STRANGER

  116. Kidmon @ 11:25 pm
    If Obama is what is called progressive, I never saw anyone go backwards so fast in my life. To me progress means going forward, he’s stuck back in 1860, 1960-he’s stuck somewhere in time. I think the key to the elections are going to be two words—Fiscal Responsibility-.

  117. Michelle // February 1, 2010 at 11:22 pm

    Hi Michelle,

    It’s the corruption that’s really bothersome. Sure, the platform is moonbatty but that doesn’t worry me nearly as much as the corruption.

    When you have a party in the majority that’s as crooked as the day is long, it can only spell disaster and that’s exactly what’s happening now. While you’d expect some lib ideas, when you couple those with corruption at the highest levels, we’re doomed unless they’re ridden out of town, tarred and feathered, on a rail.

    The ballot box is the only way, and if they all didn’t take a lesson from MA (I never thought I’d be able to say that!) they’re in for a rude awakening.

    The Tea Party movement has been the best thing to come along since cell phones, and I think that no matter the composition and who’s coming from where, a good smack upside the head is forthcoming.

  118. All a Third Party does is screw up the Elections. I Agree that the Republican Party needs a Constitutional Conservative Enema. The Only reason New York was lost was because Republicans were still voting for the RINO Republican who supposedly had removed her name from the ballot. If her name had been removed the Real Republican Candidate would have carried the extra votes and won the Election. I am Still Hoping that Patrick Hughes (The Conservative Pro Life Candidate in Illinois) wins the Republican Primary for Senate against Mark Kirk (The Rino Republican that Loves Obama’s Cap and Trade). I donated to his and Scott Brown’s Campaign. They Vote in Illinois Tomorrow. Scott Brown disappointed me when he Praised John Kerry though.

  119. #

    Joy // February 1, 2010 at 7:34 pm

    Atta girl Jacqlyn, Couldn’t have said it better. It’s time we have human candidates and not robots. I personally think Sara is a true American and will not be led around by anyone. I myself have friends that I don”t agree with 100% of the time but I’m still loyal to them. Go Sara Palin.
    ******************************************

    Joy…..There’s a lot of opinion here about all candidates but Sarah Palin is the one I trust the most. She is a real person. I got to not only meet her but I worked a phone bank with her cousin and her son in Las Vegas when they came for the rally. I also got to meet her parents when they came later on just to help with the phone banking. She is a common person with down home values who loves this country and I have NO doubt that no matter what she decides to do she will be highly successful at it!

  120. This is not about political parties … THEY ARE ALL MEMBERS OF THE CFR !

    doing what they are told …

    In other words…they are all members of the same party …
    they all have the same agenda… the same guys advise Dem and Rep presidents… the same guys work on the staff no matter who is president …

    Please understand… there isn’t a TWO PARTY system… the only two parties are the Elite VS the Citizens!
    h/t: 809475

  121. #

    d2i // February 1, 2010 at 7:43 pm

    JS – be careful who you come out for early in the game. The Rothschild’s own Britian and the UN. I could give a rip what she said at the rally you attended. She started a blog for Sarah following the election of oblahblah! The Rothchild’s need their own pretending to be R’s in power. They’ve been fighting against the Rockefeller’s for ages. I lost some hope for Sarah when she unwittingly allowed herself to be used by the likes of Lady Rothchild. And now that she’s campaigning for a RINO, a guy that was ineligible to even run for the US Presidendy tells me a lot more about where here loyalties lie. You may wish to support her BUT you will rudely awakened if she ever claims the mantle.

    Just be careful. That’s all I’m saying. Watch her politics over the next year or so. Hell, she’s even trying to move the INDEPENDENT Tea Party over to the Republican column b/c their base has abandoned them. They will abandon the Tea Party if they align choose to align themselves with one Party or the other. This woman is showing her loyalties right now. So pay attention and be wise.
    *******************************************

    d2i….As I said before……that is your opinion….I trust her and you haven’t convinced me not to. Lady Rothchild left the DemoCRAPS because of the way they corrupted the party by electing a FRAUD….the Lady knows it….you know it…..we all know it!!! She sees in Sarah what the rest of us see…..you can have your doubts all you want but I trust that Sarah will do the right thing and will put the country above politics any day of the week…..she has already showed that in Alaska…..you shouldn’t believe everything you read or hear…..I doubt all of it is true!!

  122. I whole heartedly agree that Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann would be a great Combination for President and Vice President. That is the Ticket I am Praying for in 2012. Sarah Palin has the Pulse of the American People including the Tea Parties. Michelle Bachmann is the ONLY member of congress who has been against Obama and his Gangster Politics since the beginning. I love it when she speaks. We need both of these women to put America back to it’s true course.

  123. #

    d2i // February 1, 2010 at 7:51 pm

    Thanks, Just Me. Maintaining a healthy skepticism for anyone right now is the wise thing to do. It’s too early. And I don’t like the game she’s playing. She may feel a need to support McCain but this man has no business being re elected. NONE. We talk here about cleaning up DC. Well, McCain is part of the problem in DC. So why would we support him over the opponent who is more aligned with our platform than McCain is? I don’t get it. Just b/c you like someone doesn’t make them honest, credible or righteous. It just means you like them. When it comes to politics though, you have to watch and weigh everything they do. I think it stinks she’s campaigning for McCain. It’s a stupid move on her part and Scott Brown’s. Maybe they have to do it, but that doesn’t excuse them as far as I’m concerned. No is a word that is the dictionary even today. So use it. Especially when it comes to your own ambitions and your own self preservation!
    ******************************************

    d2i…..I don’t see it that way at all…..Sarah and Scott had McCain’s support and now they are just returning the favor. Also….whether you like McCain or not…..he would have been a much better choice than the FRAUD in our house…..at least McCain has love and loyalty to the country and is not just a strict party politics person unlike many of the Dems!!!

  124. Portuguese Revolutionary War Hero – Peter Francisco // February 1, 2010 at 9:14 pm

    PALIN
    We have a PAL in PALIN.

    Sarah did not asscociate with Rothchild, Rothchild supported McCain/Palin…what was Sarah supposed to do Resign the VP nomination because a former Hillary Supporter decided to support McCain and Her vs O’Blahblah?**************************************************************************

    Peter…..You are exactly right…..I was at the rally when the Lady Rothchild introduced Sarah and said the DemoCRAP party was NO longer the party she could believe in and trust…..so she came over to the right to support two people who love this country and their loyalty is with the people….not a party…..Palin has proven that time and time again….that is why even some Republicans tried to take her down….the woman is a wonder and a loyal American…..that is what counts!!!!

  125. Free World Leader: Lech Walesa, “The world has no leadership. The US was always the last resort and hope for all other nations.That was the hope, that whenever something was going wrong, one could count on the United States. Today we lost that hope.”

    On Friday, January 29th, 2010, Lech Walesa, former President of Poland, traveled to Chicago to endorse Illinois Republican gubernatorial candidate, Adam Andrzejewski.

    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/

  126. Jacqlyn Smith

    #

    Rocknee // February 1, 2010 at 9:43 pm

    d2i,

    Sarah knows a third party can not win the POTUS slot. She will need all the votes she can get, you know that is true. My opinion!
    *******************************************

    Rocknee…true again….and if the tea party movement aligns with any party it will be the Republicans because they are closer in their beliefs and values than those from the DemoCRAP party…..not saying they will but it is possible that in order to get a tea party person elected they will have to become a Republican in order to win the nomination…..not all Republicans are as evil as some want to make them out to be here……even some Conservative DemoCRAPS are not so bad!!

  127. Jacqlyn Smith

    #

    Kim // February 1, 2010 at 9:59 pm

    I was certainly not a HRC supporter, and voted for McCain/Palin because of Palin and AGAINST Obama!!!!
    But watch what she’s doing. She is also supporting Perry in Texas, isn’t she?
    The time for blind acceptance with anyone in government is over. Question everything and everybody.
    *****************************************

    Kim….I have several friends and family that live in Texas and they too are supporting Perry….they like him and like the way he stands up to the FEDS…..as I said to d2i….don’t believe everything you read and hear….some of the stuff coming out is from the MSM and the Progressives…..sometimes you might have to take an imperfect candidate just because the unknown will not have a chance at beating a progressive……dividing the conservative vote could assure the election of a LIBERAL….look what happen to Doug Hoffman…..BTW….I believe Palin supported him too!!!!

  128. Jacqlyn Smith

    I think you are still infected with Lieberalism and it is affecting how you see things with a lieberal prism.

    What Palin is saying about Tea Parties is spot on…she is saying that tea parties should join up with teh Republican party “take it over” and work within it to make it more CONSERVATIVE which is the right strategy to effect change within a system that is already setup and to ride the wave of change especially since they are on the run and will listen on the Tea Party successes of the last 3 big election wins.

    It is the RIGHT MOVE and SMART….don;t leave the Party….get rid of the RINOS and drag the Party to the Right with Common Sense Conservatism.

    Palin is RIGHT ON.
    We have a Pal in PALIN

    *****************************************

    Peter…..Once again….you are spot on…..the way to clean house is through the Republican party……keep the great ones……get rid of the RINO’s……and you are right about moving away from Liberalism to embrace Conservatism…..it must be difficult but I wouldn’t know because I have been a conservative all of my life!

  129. Jacqlyn Smith

    #

    Kim // February 1, 2010 at 10:11 pm

    PRWH, if Sarah Palin wants us to get rid of the RINO’s, then why is she supporting them?
    ******************************************

    Kim….I doubt Sarah views the Republican party the same way as you and others here…..after all she ran as a Republican……but she is a Sarah Palin Repbulican…..like Scott Brown is a Scott Brown Republican……they are not your typical Party Republicans…..don’t know how else to explain it……..I guess you could say they put the country before the party!!!

  130. Jacqlyn Smith

    For example in Arizona McCain has his supporters if she supports McCain now and than McCain loses in the primaries and then she endorses lets say JD Heyworth that is a Win, Win for her she gets McCain’s supporters and JD’s supporters. If McCain wins she supported the republican winner who will owe her support. STRATEGY is very important and I believe she is brilliant in her approach.

    If not PALIN who?

    I say Palin 2012 with Michelled Bachman/DeMint or Romney. I prefer the TWO LADIES.

    ******************************************

    Peter…..you really are good at analyzing these things and figuring out what Palin is doing…..I am 100% behind her and I like Bachman too….however I am still like Alan Keyes….although he doesn’t think Palin is Conservative enough…..guess I will never get my ticket in 2012……Keyes/Palin…Oh well….someone will rise to the top sooner or later!!!

  131. Jacqlyn Smith

    d2i // February 1, 2010 at 10:34 pm

    I’m going to answer y’all at one time.

    Who says a third party candidate can’t win? The only ones I ever here this from are partisans – Rs or Ds. Well I say bulltwinkie. If there has ever been a time in our party system history to start a new party it is now.

    *****************************************

    d2i….the tea parties are made up of all parties….D’s….R’s….L’s……I’s……..that is why you choose a candidate and not a party…..it is not the letter behind the name it is the person and what they themselves stand for and who they stand up to……Palin stood up to her own party in Alaska and got rid of some Republicans…..some who still want to take her down!!!! AS Peter says…..she is very shrewd and knows what she is doing……a perfect leader and a loyal person to the USA!!!!

  132. Jacqlyn Smith

    #

    Portuguese Revolutionary War Hero – Peter Francisco // February 1, 2010 at 10:50 pm

    TO:
    d2i // February 1, 2010 at 10:34 pm

    I’m going to answer y’all at one time.
    \\\\\\\\\\\\\ //////////////////

    Just so that you know by and large Tea Parties were founded and attended by a majority Conservatives. There were many others from all different backgrounds that especially joined in later and we are glad they did BUT it was mostly a Conservative movement.

    I would love to get a third Party BUT only if it is a Middle Left Third Party…..you guys can go splinter. On our side I want to CHANGE the Republican party to be what it always was a Party fo Conservatism, tradition, family, American Way, etc. We can drag this party to the right where it should always be…If Reagan did it so can we and so can PALIN.

    The best chance there was for a third party was with Ross Perot and it may never happen again.

    Most Americans have a hard enough time knowing what the 2 partie soffer never mind 3 LOL.

    Now you say we shouldn’t support soeone unless they are 100% with us….Conservatives support Palin, who are you supporting in the middle party?
    *******************************************

    Peter…..I think d2i and some of her followers support Ron Paul…..I like he was to audit the fed but he is not electable…..does not have the characteristics to win…..there are too many uninformed voters who go strictly on personality which he has NONE….unfortunately for him!

  133. Jacqlyn Smith

    #

    Michelle // February 1, 2010 at 11:22 pm

    SueK @ 10:24 pm
    The Dems are drunk with power, but they are corrupt and inept beyond belief, that is why us Dems are heading for the Tea Party-Republican. I think the people of the party are smart, decent and honest-they will figure out how to cure what they believe ails their party. I think you are going to see some good people rise up out of Tea Party and Republican party. Keep the faith.

    ******************************************

    Michelle…..I agree with you whole heartedly……many people have moved out of the party of D’s or R’s…..I have always been an Independent…..I have never voted strictly party…..I vote person and I believe in balance of power…..especially NOW with all of the corruption in our government presently going on!!

  134. It only makes sense that Conservatives take over the Republican party, since the Reps party is SUPPOSE to be Conservative. It would be wrong to try turning it into something else and would end up just meshing the two parties like we have now!

    There’s nothing scary or radical about Conservatism. It’s based solidly on the Constitution and small gov’t. To demand the party be “moderate” to accomodate lost dems is just wrong. We’ve already been down that road and is why the Reps are a mess.

    If Dems want to have a moderate party, then they should start a new party. ..the mod squad. The Republicans are in the mess they’re in now because they DID listen to Dem’s and tried to be all things to all people. They lost their core.

    I knew several years back with the way progressivism was on the move that for them to stand up for their Conservative values, it would’ve met lost seats, but I felt it better than losing their souls. I’m not all that Conservative on some issues other than small gov’t, but some moral clarity and Conservative values from those running in the Republica party doesn’t threaten me at all. I think it’s a plus for them and they should hold their head up high with those beliefs…just keep gov’t small.

    Apparently more than myself felt that way, cuz they’re starting to get the message that win or lose, stick to small gov’t principles…we can disagree on some of the periphial stuff…but small gov’t is not an option.

    Whoever mentioned Palin/Bachman, I agree. That would be the ticket for me!

  135. Jacqlyn Smith

    #

    Emudude // February 2, 2010 at 12:19 am

    All a Third Party does is screw up the Elections. I Agree that the Republican Party needs a Constitutional Conservative Enema. The Only reason New York was lost was because Republicans were still voting for the RINO Republican who supposedly had removed her name from the ballot. If her name had been removed the Real Republican Candidate would have carried the extra votes and won the Election. I am Still Hoping that Patrick Hughes (The Conservative Pro Life Candidate in Illinois) wins the Republican Primary for Senate against Mark Kirk (The Rino Republican that Loves Obama’s Cap and Trade). I donated to his and Scott Brown’s Campaign. They Vote in Illinois Tomorrow. Scott Brown disappointed me when he Praised John Kerry though.
    ******************************************

    Emudude……Once again…..take in what Peter says…..Scott may have praised Kerry but that doesn’t mean he supports or believes in any of his Progressive policies……let’s all give Brown a chance before we jump him for saying nice things about people he works with!

  136. Jacqlyn Smith

    #

    Kim // February 2, 2010 at 12:19 am

    This is not about political parties … THEY ARE ALL MEMBERS OF THE CFR !

    doing what they are told …

    In other words…they are all members of the same party …
    they all have the same agenda… the same guys advise Dem and Rep presidents… the same guys work on the staff no matter who is president …

    Please understand… there isn’t a TWO PARTY system… the only two parties are the Elite VS the Citizens!
    h/t: 809475
    *******************************************

    Kim….as Peter said….Rome was not built in a day and things will not change over night…..cleansing DC and ridding it of Progressive influence is going to take some time….most likely years!!! We the people must never go back to sleep!!!

  137. Jacqlyn Smith

    #

    Emudude // February 2, 2010 at 12:29 am

    I whole heartedly agree that Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann would be a great Combination for President and Vice President. That is the Ticket I am Praying for in 2012. Sarah Palin has the Pulse of the American People including the Tea Parties. Michelle Bachmann is the ONLY member of congress who has been against Obama and his Gangster Politics since the beginning. I love it when she speaks. We need both of these women to put America back to it’s true course.
    *******************************************

    Emudude……DITTO!!

  138. Jacqlyn Smith

    ticktock // February 2, 2010 at 1:46 am

    It only makes sense that Conservatives take over the Republican party, since the Reps party is SUPPOSE to be Conservative. It would be wrong to try turning it into something else and would end up just meshing the two parties like we have now!

    ******************************************

    ticktock…..What you say is spot on…..it’s like Rush keeps saying…..the one the MSM puts down the most and tries to discredit is the one who should run in 2012…….and who better than Palin…..the Progressives hate her and everything she stands for and the MSM are always harping on something about her…..she bugs them to death……as Peter says…..

    we have a PAL in PALIN!!!!

  139. don in california

    Once again this ole country boy is going to express his opinion.

    I believe that a 3d party would just split the vote. The tea party members and conservatives (dem or rep) need to make inroads into the rep party and slowly take it over. For now, vote for the best person we can and then look for the next best person and vote them in. One at a time and finally take back the Republican party. We don’t need a Dem party and a Dem lite party.

  140. don in california

    Time for bed, got a dr’s appt tomorrow and need my rest. Have a good night and God bless!

  141. Jacqlyn Smith

    Some humor…….

    Father O’Malley rose from his bed. It was a fine spring day in his new Washington, D.C. Parish. He walked to the window of his bedroom to get a deep breath of air and to see the beautiful day outside.
    He then noticed there was a jacka$$ lying dead in the middle of his front lawn. He promptly made a phone call. The conversation went like this:

    “Good morning. This is Speaker Pelosi. How might I help you?”

    “And the best of the day te yerself. This is Father O’Malley at St.Brigid’s. There’s a jacka$$ lying dead in me front lawn. Would ye be so kind as to send a couple o’yer lads to take care of the matter?”

    Speaker Pelosi, considering herself to be quite a wit, replied, “Father, it was always my impression that you people took care of last rites!”

    There was silence on the line for a moment, and Father O’Malley replied:

    “Aye, that’s certainly true, but we are also obliged to first notify the next of kin.”

  142. Jacqlyn Smith

    Read the entire story here.,,,,,

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123843

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    BORN IN THE USA?
    Courts can remove ineligible chief executive
    Precedent cited in appeal of California challenge to president’s tenure
    Posted: February 01, 2010
    9:58 pm Eastern

    By Bob Unruh
    © 2010 WorldNetDaily

    North Dakota Gov. Thomas Moodie, removed from office when the state Supreme Court found him ineligible

    In the United States, courts can, in fact, remove a chief executive officer of a government if that officer is found to be ineligible, according to a court precedent cited in an appeal of a California lawsuit that challenges Barack Obama’s legitimacy in the White House.

    A multitude of cases have been brought over the issue of Obama’s eligibility. Some are by critics who have doubts about whether he was born in Hawaii in 1961 as he has written, and others are from those who question whether the framers of the Constitution specifically excluded dual citizens – Obama’s father was a subject of the British crown at Obama’s birth – from being eligible for the presidency.

    The disputes revolve around the Constitution’s demand that the president be a “natural born citizen.”

  143. Pixel Patriot

    Ed Schultz on visiting White House: ‘Almost a Shrine’ to Obama
    By Jack Coleman
    Mon, 02/01/2010
    Agreed, this doesn’t come as much of a shock. What’s surprising is that Schultz said “almost”.

    Here’s Schultz on his radio show Friday talking about meeting with Obama advisor David Axelrod at the White House the day before, along with fellow liberal radio host Bill Press and several other left-wing media types Schultz did not identify…

    SCHULTZ: First of all you walk into the White House, in the West Wing, and there are pictures all over, I mean everywhere! Of President Obama! I mean, of his life in the first year as president of the United States. Now I don’t know if that’s the way it is with every president, but it was almost a shrine. I mean, well, here’s a picture of Obama the president with his kids over here. There he is getting on Air Force One. Here he is with some military people. Here he is on the line working the line at one of his campaign stops. I mean, just, it was just one picture after another! (laughs)
    And so I got the message right away that there’s nothing but Obama fans in the White House which I think is a good thing. ‘Cause it’s always good to have the team together, right? (laughs)
    I’m not sure which is more bizarre — Schultz not realizing this doesn’t speak well of Obama, or Schultz saying “I got the message right away that there’s nothing but Obama fans in the White House.” This constitutes a “message”? What was he expecting, a tea party protest?

    As if those “Obama fans” have much say about photo homages to Dear Leader. Instead of that, how about photographs and illustrations of previous families who’ve lived in the White House? Or portraits of staffers who’ve worked there for decades? Or character studies of men and women in uniform, whose service helps the current occupants of the executive mansion sleep soundly at night. Perhaps even — dare I say it — art?

    ________________________________________________________________

    Would it be asking too much to hang a copy of the Constitution?

    Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5

    “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.”

  144. Pixel Patriot

    Misprison of Felony trumps rules of endorsement…just saying

  145. Trying to catch up with all the comments posted here…….. Someone commented several days ago that Obama is going to appoint Claire McCaskill to the Missouri Supreme Court. The governor of the state appoints Supreme Court Judges so if Obama wants to “reward” Claire for her vote on the health care bill, he would have to influence Jay Nixon, the Democrat Missouri governor to appoint her. I wonder want lengths Obama would go to get Obamacare passed………Just saying.

  146. Is GHW trying to make Jeb our next president?
    Was that the meeting with obama for his saudia supporters?

  147. Great post. We all know why he’s hiding his records. Just asking the question is rhetorical.

    So, I’ll say something about another topic. James Okeefe. He was slandered and lied about by the msm from the word go. Most conservatives and bloggers realized we needed to wait and see. Some, however, just took what the msm handed them and were ready to throw okeefe overboard.

    Now we know that the msm was lying all along. Let this be a lesson to all conservatives that you cannot believe anything the liberal msm says and
    Don’t Throw Another Conservative Under The Buss Just Because Some Lying Lib Says Something.

  148. Linda from NY

    February 02, 2010

    Do We Have What It Takes?

    By Vasko Kohlmayer

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/do_we_have_what_it_takes.html

  149. Linda from NY

    February 02, 2010

    Pelosi’s Last Hurrah

    By Jane Jamison

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/pelosis_last_hurrah.html

  150. Linda from NY

    SOROS PROFITS FROM SELF-CREATED CRISIS IN PERU (May 2000 Must Read)

    Words for Good ^ | 5/23/2003 | By Richard Petty Deegan

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2442507/posts

  151. Linda from NY

    Mister President, Welcome To BROWN Country! (Stranger in a Strange Land)

    Boston Herald ^ | February 2, 2010 | Michael Graham

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2442503/posts

  152. Linda from NY

    Rick Lazio targets Andrew Cuomo in New York governor’s race

    syracuse.com ^ | February 01, 2010 | The Associated Press

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2442474/posts

  153. Linda from NY

    Florida feels heat of NASA cutback;loss of at least 7,000 jobs…betrayal by Pres. Barack Obama.

    Miami Herald ^ | February 2, 2010 | KRIS HUNDLEY AND ALEX LEARY

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2442476/posts

  154. Linda from NY

    Conservative Lawmakers Hope Constitutional Amendments Will Ban Health Insurance Mandate

    Monday, February 01, 2010

    By David A. Lieb, Associated Press

    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/60797

  155. truthbetold11

    J S as much as i admire Palin and what she brings to the table. Her running would only fuel the dems with more hate for her and rally their base. That hate for doesnt’ disappear over nite. ?It gwb could run again the dems would go balistic. Palin would make a great S OF S or another cabinet post. The left would use a full assault and since they own the media it would be worse. The person will rise up in the next year or so. right now the dems are going for broke knowing full well that when they seat Scott major leg won’t get passed. this next week will be the left dem on full display

  156. Linda from NY

    Virginia Senate Bills Say No To Requiring Health Insurance

    Washington Post ^ | February 01, 2010

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2442448/posts

  157. Good Morning! Did you see this?

    http://www.philly.com/philly/news/nation_world/20100202_Early_draft_of_the_Constitution_found_in_Phila_.html

    In the early draft it says that you can be a natural born citizen if you come form kenya and your name is Steve! Wow – I guess we’ve been wrong all this time.

  158. Jacqlyn Smith

    yo // February 2, 2010 at 7:54 am

    Great post. We all know why he’s hiding his records. Just asking the question is rhetorical.

    ********************************************

    Yo…I heard O’Keefe’s interview with Hannity…..I too felt as you do…..the staff at that office must have recognized him from the ACORN thing and maybe he didn’t go about it in the right way but he was trying to find out why for weeks people couldn’t get a hold of Landrieu….I too called her office many …many times and only got a busy signal…..couldn’t even leave a message. My guess is she told her staff to take all the phones off the hooks……that is simply not acceptable!!

  159. Early draft of the Constitution found in Phila.

  160. Linda from NY

    Tuesday, February 2, 2010

    Krauthammer: “Time Is Up” on Blaming Your Predecessor, “At This Point It’s All Whining”

    http://hotairpundit.blogspot.com/2010/02/krauthammer-time-is-up-on-blaming-your.html

  161. Jacqlyn Smith

    Linda from NY // February 2, 2010 at 8:02 am

    February 02, 2010

    Pelosi’s Last Hurrah

    ********************************************

    Linda…..PeLOUSY…..ONE DISGUSTING IDIOT!!!! This woman should be in jail!!

  162. Linda from NY // February 2, 2010 at 8:21 am
    Conservative Lawmakers Hope Constitutional Amendments Will Ban Health Insurance Mandate
    Monday, February 01, 2010
    By David A. Lieb, Associated Press
    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/60797
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Missouri is taking action today…….

    SCR 34 – This concurrent resolution reaffirms Missouri’s sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment and demands that the federal government stop all activities outside the scope of their constitutionally-delegated powers.

    This concurrent resolution is similar to HCR 13 (2009).

    http://www.senate.mo.gov/10info/BTS_Web/Bill.aspx?SessionType=R&BillID=3163940

  163. Jacqlyn Smith

    Linda from NY // February 2, 2010 at 8:13 am

    Florida feels heat of NASA cutback;loss of at least 7,000 jobs…betrayal by Pres. Barack Obama.

    *********************************************

    Linda…..Fox just visited the mayor from Florida who the FRAUD bowed to…..she said it is nothing because that is just the FRAUD’S nature…..she went on to say he is such and kind and caring man and I wish everyone could meet him…….I was thinking…..she wouldn’t want me to meet him……because while he was down there bowing I wouldn’t be able to resist KICKING HIM IN HIS PRIVATES!!!! LOL 🙂 🙂

  164. Jacqlyn Smith

    #

    truthbetold11 // February 2, 2010 at 8:23 am

    J S as much as i admire Palin and what she brings to the table. Her running would only fuel the dems with more hate for her and rally their base. That hate for doesnt’ disappear over nite. ?It gwb could run again the dems would go balistic. Palin would make a great S OF S or another cabinet post. The left would use a full assault and since they own the media it would be worse. The person will rise up in the next year or so. right now the dems are going for broke knowing full well that when they seat Scott major leg won’t get passed. this next week will be the left dem on full display
    *******************************************

    Maybe but I don’t think so……their base is leaving in droves and getting behind conservatives and this is the ideal time to get someone like Palin and Bachman elected….both very qualified and experienced law makers who love their country and it’s citizens……Independents are no longer supporting the FRAUD….they are the ones who elect people……and they are fed up with the THUGACRACY of this immoral and corrupt administration……Palin would be a breath of fresh air…..as Peter says……

    we have a PAL in PALIN!!!!

  165. Jacqlyn Smith

    Hey Zach…..I hope you are just kidding about the early draft saying the FRAUD is a NBC!!! LOL 🙂

  166. Jacqlyn Smith

    GB….I had seen both of those videos before…..very telling…..too bad they didn’t circulate before Nov. 2008!!! The country lost!

  167. **** New Post ****

  168. HILLARY’S HANDING OVER MORE OF OUR RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS TO THE U.N.

    U.S. Agrees to Timetable for UN Gun Ban

    The United Nations and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are moving forward with their plan to confiscate your guns.

    The United States joined 152 other countries in support of the Arms Trade Treaty Resolution, which establishes the dates for the 2012 UN conference intended to attack American sovereignty by stripping Americans of the right to keep and bear arms.

    Working groups of anti-gun countries will begin scripting language for the conference this year, creating a blueprint for other countries when they meet at the full conference.

    The stakes couldn’t be higher.

    snipped from:
    http://nationalgunrights.org/blog/?p=359#more-359

  169. Kim // February 1, 2010 at 10:28 pm

    “Craig Mundie, chief research and strategy officer for Microsoft, told fellow globalists at the summit that the Internet needed to be policed by means of introducing licenses similar to drivers licenses – in other words government permission to use the web.”

    http://www.infowars.com/enemies-of-free-speech-call-for-internet-licensing/
    ———————–

    The song…….Money, Money, Money, Money….Moooooney!!!! Remember it???

  170. The South // February 1, 2010 at 10:44 pm

    The choice of Palin, an unknown, was all a ploy to get the dem elected, if the fraudulent voting machines didn’t work.

    Devvy Kidd wrote that this “unknown” announced in the summer as VP was BULLSH**, because records show donations going to McCain/Palin fund even while she was pregnant with the baby.

    As they say, CHECK IT OUT!!!

    We were ‘HAD’!!!

  171. at least McCain has love and loyalty to the country and is not just a strict party politics person unlike many of the Dems!!!

    Which may have been/and is now my problem with McCain……..I like party loyalty and sticking to your principles…….TOO MUCH COMPROMISING IS WHAT GOT US WHERE WE ARE NOW!!

    THIS REACHING ACROSS THE AISLE IN ALL ACTUALITY ‘SUCKS’!!!

  172. #

    JJ // February 2, 2010 at 9:36 am

    The South // February 1, 2010 at 10:44 pm

    The choice of Palin, an unknown, was all a ploy to get the dem elected, if the fraudulent voting machines didn’t work.

    Devvy Kidd wrote that this “unknown” announced in the summer as VP was BULLSH**, because records show donations going to McCain/Palin fund even while she was pregnant with the baby.

    As they say, CHECK IT OUT!!!

    We were ‘HAD’!!!
    ****************************************

    JJ……It was because McCain chose Palin is why he even got close to the votes he received….before he announced her it looked very bleak for him to even save face!

  173. #

    JJ // February 2, 2010 at 9:56 am

    at least McCain has love and loyalty to the country and is not just a strict party politics person unlike many of the Dems!!!

    Which may have been/and is now my problem with McCain……..I like party loyalty and sticking to your principles…….TOO MUCH COMPROMISING IS WHAT GOT US WHERE WE ARE NOW!!

    THIS REACHING ACROSS THE AISLE IN ALL ACTUALITY ‘SUCKS’!!!
    (((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

    As Peter said…..It’s not the Party stuff…..it’s about not being Conservative enough……the Dems keep pulling the Repubs into believing that they need to be more like them…..LIBERAL….well it ain’t working…..Repubs need to stick to their guns…..stay conservative and no leaning left…..better to be farther right than any lean to the left!!

  174. Linda from NY // February 2, 2010 at 8:21 am

    Conservative Lawmakers Hope Constitutional Amendments Will Ban Health Insurance Mandate

    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/60797
    —————————————–
    “They are merely symbolic gestures,” said Michael Dorf, a constitutional law professor at Cornell University. “If this Congress were to pass an individual mandate, and if it is constitutional – which I believe it is – the express rule under the supremacy clause (of the U.S. Constitution) is that the federal law prevails.”

    Well, Mr. Dorf, site the statute……don’t stop there….where does the Constitution say federal law prevails state?

  175. Virginia Senate Bills Say No To Requiring Health Insurance

    Again…….

    “They are merely symbolic gestures,” said Michael Dorf, a constitutional law professor at Cornell University. “If this Congress were to pass an individual mandate, and if it is constitutional – which I believe it is – the express rule under the supremacy clause (of the U.S. Constitution) is that the federal law prevails.”

  176. JJ……It was because McCain chose Palin is why he even got close to the votes he received….before he announced her it looked very bleak for him to even save face!
    —————–
    Because he chose Palin is why he didn’t win!!!!!
    Noone wants an unknown when there were many great, talented officials to choose as a running mate.
    Just look at the possibilities written of even now.

    Palin’s support was mostly charisma and passion.

  177. JJ prior to the $550 Billion run on the banks in 2 hours on 9-15-08 McCain led Obama.
    The huge withdrawal resulted in the imminent collapse of America’s banks, it was orchestrated by unknown outside forces to throw the election and steal vast sums.

  178. Jacqlyn Smith

    #

    JJ // February 2, 2010 at 11:33 am

    JJ……It was because McCain chose Palin is why he even got close to the votes he received….before he announced her it looked very bleak for him to even save face!
    —————–
    Because he chose Palin is why he didn’t win!!!!!
    Noone wants an unknown when there were many great, talented officials to choose as a running mate.
    Just look at the possibilities written of even now.

    Palin’s support was mostly charisma and passion.
    *******************************************

    That is not why they didn’t win and the polls said the exact opposite of what you say…..you are going by what the MSM is telling you…more lies but you should be better than to fall for their BS……McCain was chosen by the DemoCRAPS to run against the FRAUD….just like the DemoCRAP establishment of the progressive arm ousted HRC and put the FRAUD in there….they knew she couldn’t beat McCain….a war hero!!!

  179. Jacqlyn Smith

    terminu // February 2, 2010 at 11:41 am

    JJ prior to the $550 Billion run on the banks in 2 hours on 9-15-08 McCain led Obama.
    The huge withdrawal resulted in the imminent collapse of America’s banks, it was orchestrated by unknown outside forces to throw the election and steal vast sums

    ******************************************

    terimu…..it is clear that there are a few people at this blog who are letting the MSM and their Liberal roots cloud their opinion of Palin….a great and loyal American!!!! McCain has said many times….if it wasn’t for Palin he wouldn’t have done as well as he did and no one else would have given him the bump he had…..if he hadn’t signed on to TARP and said stop the bailouts then he would have been a Maverick…..he didn’t and he wasn’t!!! Palin was not in control…..if she had of been they may have won!!!

  180. For Glenn Beck:

    Article II, Section 1, Clause 5: No person except a natural-born citizen …shall be eligible to the office of President.

    The issue of whether or not Obama is “eligible to the office of President” depends upon whether or not he is an Article II “natural born citizen” of the United States.

    The phrase “natural born citizen” “must be interpreted in the light of the common law, the principles and history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the Constitution”.

    United States v. Wong Kim Ark., 18 S. Ct. 456, 169 U.S. 649 (U.S. 03/28/1898)

    [1] SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

    [16] The Constitution nowhere defines the meaning of these words [“citizen of the United States,” and “natural-born citizen of the United States”], either by way of inclusion or of exclusion, except in so far as this is done by the affirmative declaration that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” In this, as in other respects, it [The Constitution] must be interpreted in the light of the common law, the principles and history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the Constitution. Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162 [At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 21 Wall. 162 (1874]; Ex parte Wilson, 114 U.S. 417, 422; Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 624, 625; Smith v. Alabama, 124 U.S. 465. The language of the Constitution, as has been well said, could not be understood without reference to the common law. 1 Kent Com. 336; Bradley, J., in Moore v. United States, 91 U.S. 270, 274.

    The “common law, the principles and history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the Constitution” was plainly expressed by the Supreme Court of the United States in the dissenting opinion of Scott v. Sandford, which quoted Vattel, and explicitly stated, “The natives or natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens…”

    Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (U.S. 01/02/1856)

    [1] UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

    [418] …The natives or natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens…

    Furthermore, the Supreme Court of the United States in 1814 relied upon Vattel’s “Law of Nations” as the authority on citizenship issues, and stated in The Venus, “The natives, or indigenes [natural-born citizens], are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

    The Venus, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 253, 1814

    “Vattel, …is more explicit and more satisfactory on it [CITIZENSHIP ISSUES] than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, [Vattel] says, ‘…The natives, or indigenes [natural-born citizens], are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.’ ”

    Vattel’s Law of Nations: § 212. Citizens and natives

    …The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

    Finally, the Supreme Court of the United States, in Minor v. Happersett, confirmed the definition of a “natural born citizen” as “children born in a country of parents who were its citizens”.

    Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 21 Wall. 162 (1874)

    “ ‘No person except a natural-born citizen …shall be eligible to the office of President’… The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

    Simply put, Article II “natural born citizens” are those citizens who are “born in the country, of parents who are citizens.”

    Hence, Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen” of the United States, even if he was born in Hawaii, as his father was a “foreigner”…

    To reiterate, Obama’s father was not a citizen of the United States.

    Therefore, Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen” of the United States.

    Thus, Obama is not “eligible to the office of President”.

  181. A little off-topic. Was reading an article of the Orly Taitz case going to DC and it covered the multiple SSNs of Obama. (Tried to post on Orly’s site, but there no comments allowed — I guess because of the hackers.) As a result, I came here.

    There is a lot of confusion in my mind as to what is true or false about the Obama Social Security Number issue.

    Susan Daniels, an investigator filed an affidavit, in the Barnett v. Obama case. She stated that she had located Barack Obama’s Social Security Number issued between 1977 and 1979 in the State of Connecticut. She stated that it is the only Social Security Number Barack Obama ever used. (SSN 042-XX-4424)

    If SSN 042-XX-4424 is the only SSN Obama has used, how in the world did he obtain that number while he was living in Hawaii? He had to have had a SSN to work part-time at the ice cream shop in Hawaii as a teenager.

    My problem is that the SSN for Hawaii prefix is 575 or 576. Obama HAD TO HAVE HAD this prefix on his SSN as he was residing in Hawaii. If his current SSN does NOT begin with 575 or 576, there is a BIG question that has to be raised. It starts to build a case that he is an assumed identity.

    Another article on SSN of Barack (Hussein) Obama showed multiple SSNs from various states, BUT none of the SSNs in the article were from Hawaii. I found that extremely curious.

    My question to the learned folks here is: Does anyone know the SSN prefix of Obama’s SSN? (His Selective Service card has it redacted and that’s the only “official” piece of correspondence I’ve seen.)

    Anyone got a clue?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s