I have begun an article that has evolved out of my efforts to understand all of the election laws as
they apply to the 2008 election and Barack Obama’s eligibility. It is clear to me and others that
many State officers, Election officials and judges are not performing their duties under the US
Constitution, Federal Election Law and state laws. It appears that many are guilty of High Crimes and
Misdemeanors.
What is also self evident to me is that the states and political parrties that require Electoral College
Electors to vote for a certain candidate are violating the letter and spirit of the US Constitution and the
intent of the Founding Fathers.
I intend to finish this article soon. A personal obligation prevents me from finishing today. However,
I would like for those reading this to begin reading more about this topic. Begin thinking about initiating
two broad types of actions:
- Lawsuits to declare unconstitutional state laws that mandate the way Electors must vote.
- Petitions or other remedy catalysts to hold state officers, election officials and Electors
accountable. This can be in the form of recall or impeachment petitions or whatever is most appropriate
in your state.
Millions are outraged. We must channel our energies into productive efforts.
Citizen WElls 
I have read all over the place the people on the left calling people like Leo, Berg, yourself, nut jobs for pursuing this. One thing the rest of the world should understand is that if there wasn’t truth to this, there wouldn’t have havee 17 cases trying to force the issue. The Supreme Court would have denied the writ yesterday, and it would be dead.
I heard that on the NBC Today Show, they gave mentioned to yesterday’s conference and the gracious hosts said.. “It will go nowhere, because the people have spoken”. They obviously don’t realize that the popular vote did not make Barack Obama president.
There are others that worry that if this election is undone there will be riots and other civil unrest.
I have a feeling there will be civil unrest anyway.
To the SCOTUS
If you dont get him,he will get you.PROTECT OUR CONSTITUTION.
Just tell us what to do to put a stop to this. This is out of control. The government is corrupt.
It is like they all are under the influence of a drug named Obama. He is such a fraud.
I don’t get it. Why are all these people apoplectically defending Obama? Can somebody please explain?
If my candidate were under this cloud, I would be first in line to get this sorted out. If he turns out clean, I would want the information so I could whack the naysayers. If my candidate turned out to be dirty – again – I would be first in line to call for a new election.
People seem to want to treat these constitutional issues as mere technicalities. They are not. They are our protection against usurpers and undue foreign influence. Regardless of party or preferred candidate. We need to know!
Obama has no background and no credentials. He just showed up and raised his hand – “ooh ooh, pick me!”. And he was aggressively marketed like the latest teenage fad. We MUST know if he is pure and clean or if he likely has nasty hidden agendas. Even more importantly (and especially given his “global” background), is he a puppet? Of whom?
For this election, in particular, there are three distinct classes of Democrats:
1. Those who we call the disciples of the Messiah. Those who would follow him anywhere, even if proven to be a non-citizen and/or Stalin or Hitler reincarnate. The kool-aid drinkers. We cannot address these people. They are fools in every sense of the word.
2. People who for various positive reasons, and even negative ones (hatred for Bush), vote a straight party ticket, no matter what. These people do not care and are impervious to any type of reasoning.
3. People who honestly believe that Obama was vetted by “someone” and that it is preposterous to believe that Obama is anything other than an upright citizen. These people we can and must reach with the truth. They will turn (dramatically) against Obama once they discover they have been conned.
God bless the patriots. Truth and light must prevail in the end.
First of all:
“Ignorance is not bliss”
“Knowledge is power”
Here is a good place to start:
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/laws.html
Challenge your state law if applicable. Remind your state officers and election officials of their duties.
Join with like minded people.
Check here for people in your state:
http://www.democratic-disaster.com/
If the SCOTUS denies Leo’s case, then it will send the message that the Socialist candidate Calero was eligible to be on the ballot despite the fact that he is either a naturalized citizen or a permanent resident. This is why I don’t believe the SCOTUS will deny the case on Monday unless they want to send the message that Arnold Schwarzenegger is eligible to run too. They will have to define once and for all who a natural born citizen is and then compel the New Jersey Secretary of State to apply that definition to all of the candidates. Not only that, the other Secretaries of State of other states will be forced to do the same. Obama will then be forced to prove that he meets that definition and reveal all those documents from his past that he’s been hiding from the public.
Thanks, CW, this just got emailed to my Representative and Senators of Ky, and it specifically said
Note: show this to yor boss, aides.
Seems the Supreme Court is waiting to hear from me before issuing a decision on Donofrio, so here goes: While the Court is more than loathe to enter this dispute, currently it has no choice (thanks to the audacious one — and I don’t mean Leo, I mean Barack) and the ONLY WAY to bring closure, knowing CLOSURE IS ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL before any Presidential inauguration, is to back the original intent of the Constitution, meaning, Obama is NOT an Article II “natural born citizen” (albeit Obama may or may not be a “citizen”, a question heated by the steadfast refusal of the DNC or any of the Secretaries of State to require his birth certificate, which the Court will now not have to confront).
Remember — the threat of a lawsuit is often more effective than an actual lawsuit.
The number of lawsuits no longer matters. There are assistant Attorneys General all across the nation who are reading these lawsuits, calling their clients, and checking our their internal office procedures to discover whether they comply with their State laws — and this is underway already, right now!
That is the real benefit of everything that is taking place!
And, even if Obama serves out his 1st Term (because the Courts are unwilling to Act before January 6), that is no guarantee he will be allowed a 2nd Term.
The reason — a “Mad Dog” decision. What this means, is that every “Dog” gets “One bite!” But, never a “Second bite!”
On matters of First Impression, often the first person who violates the law who goes unpunished on the grounds that “he could not possibly have known that he was violating the law.”
But, no one else then can use that same excuse in the future.
hat may be the final decision this time around on all of the Secretaries of State who have failed to carry out their responsibilities. They will get away with this time, but never again in the future.
So, Barack Obama may get One Term (But One Term only), and that is how the Courts may decide the case (to prevent rioting in the streets).
I have followed the career of Barack Obama for many, many years, and I know for sure that he is in this WAY OVER HIS HEAD, and he may be only a One Term President in any case.
And I fully expect the Democrats to lose significant number of seats in 2010, simply because Obama is not as smart as anyone thinks he is, and he carries a lot of baggage that “blackmailers” will be happy to dump on him, once they discover how weak he really is.
This guy is truly a “cipher!”
If SCOTUS doesn’t rule in Berg or Leo’s favor, then what is stopping Calero to file a lawsuit claiming “discrimination”? Hey, there’s an idea!
Parsifal, I will explain to you why these people blindly defend Mr. Obama.
They have allowed themselves to be brainwashed by what you all call the “mainstream media”. To you, the lies were apparent, not to them, they heard what they wanted to hear. They were brainwashed so far as to believe that Mr. Obama is an African-American, they actually believe this. To them, Mr. Obama is not a person, he is an ideal. To us, he’s just a cheap Chicago fixer.
It is possible Donofrio’s case could go back to the state court to verify the issue of natural born citizen as it may be the responsibility of states officials.
My question to Leo Donofrio:
“If scotus refers the case back to the state court to prove eligibility (good possibility, since it is their responsibility), is it possible that the supreme court justices may still motion to stay the national election until the eligibility issue is satisfied? (of all the many possibilities)
Leo’s response:
[Ed. Note – It’s possible they may do that, but only as to verifying state issues, like where he was born. If a BC is then produced saying he was born in Hawaii, which I believe to be true, then it would come back to SCOTUS for the Article 2, Section 1 argument. They could hold off on that until it’s absolutely nnecessary. This is a possibility.]”
There maybe a chance the Supremes see the merits of the case, but this can only be satisfied in the state courts as to where it is the states responsibility to verify a candidates eligibility. (Didn’t the Supremes send back to the state for recount during the 2000 election?) As I understand it, the state judge did not act on the merits of the case and the Supremes may want to see that done as to ‘verifying state issues’, like natural born citizen. The state and the 50 states need to recognize the strength of the arguments as to the constitutional issue.
Maybe the stay on the national election will remain pending but with a time limit as to the electoral college vote (and/or certification) as this may be ‘necessary’.
The case is strong as simply by the fact that the candidate from Nicaragua is obviously ineligible as to the issue of natural born citizen.
If perjury is a violation of an oath, then has Obama already committed perjury?
Did his US Senate oath include upholding the US Constitution?
It seems electors who vote before resolving the questions raised by Berg and Donofrio may also be committing perjury.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Parsifal wrote: Obama has no background and no credentials. He just showed up and raised his hand – “ooh ooh, pick me!”. And he was aggressively marketed like the latest teenage fad. We MUST know if he is pure and clean or if he likely has nasty hidden agendas. Even more importantly (and especially given his “global” background), is he a puppet? Of whom?
——————————————————–
That is the 700 million dollar question (that’s about how much money he has raised from all the poor slobs, many of whom many have since become unemployed and could really use that $100 now, and from his illegal foreign contributors).
And I think the question can be answered by answering the following question first: WHERE WAS HE FOR THE TWO YEARS HE CLAIMED HE WAS AT COLUMBIA UNIV. ??? No one, NO ONE remembers him being there and over 400 people have been questioned. And of course he won’t release the college records.
Maybe he was in England being “trained” by George Soros et al. Maybe he was in Iran. Pakistan. Indonesia. Kenya. All of the above.
As I’ve said before: Oh what a tangled web he weaves when he decided to deceive. CALL IN SICK, OBAMA. DO IT NOW.