Delaware and Chicago corruption, Attorney General Biden, Delaware News Journal lies about Larry Sinclair, Smears in Delaware from Bidens and Obama camp

The Delaware News Journal continues to print lies about Larry Sinclair, even after they have been asked to print a retraction. I posted an article, several days ago, about the attempts coming out of Delaware to discredit and silence Larry Sinclair. Despite being notified the information they were supplying was false, despite Larry Sinclair providing copies of court documents on his blog, the forces in Delaware have joined the dark side of the Obama Camp to discredit Sinclair. Larry Sinclair has stated that he did not pay for motel stays with money orders. In fact Larry Sinclair gave me this information several weeks ago and he has been consistent. I spoke to Larry a few minutes ago and his attorney plans to sue the Delaware News Company and the parent company Gannett.

Here are the latest statements from Larry Sinclair regarding the smears coming out of Delaware:


Posted by Larry Sinclair on Saturday, July 12, 2008

It appears that even after the News Journal, a Gannet News Paper was sent written documentation along with a request for a retraction to their publishing false information, they have decided to continue to publish false statements.  It is for this reason that I will direct an Attorney who has agreed to sue the News Journal on my behalf at no charge to me whatsoever, to file suit against the News Journal, its parent Company Gannet, and its reporters who have continued to write this false information.


I ave not entered any plea as claimed by the News Journal dealing with any thing to do with “counterfiet money orders.” In fact that is absolutely nothing in the New Castle County Superior Court file alleging anything to do with “money orders” as has been publish twice now by the News Journal.  I entered a NOT GUILTY PLEA to the charge of “Theft” as stated on the only charging document in the court file which is published below:

Blogger says he’s innocent of theft

Frequent critic of Obama stayed in Del. hotel

By ESTEBAN PARRA • The News Journal • July 12, 2008

Larry Sinclair, frequent critic of Barack Obama, pleaded not guilty Tuesday to charges he used counterfeit money orders to pay for a three-week stay at a New Castle hotel last year.

Sinclair’s plea was entered by Newark attorney Fran E. Farren, who said he was retained by the Duluth, Minn., resident last week. Farren said he was hired to defend Sinclair and was unwilling to say anything about his client’s Internet activities, which have brought Sinclair some notoriety in the blogosphere.

Sinclair has been making charges about Obama involving sex and drugs on his blog. Messages to the Obama campaign headquarters were not returned.

“Lawrence Sinclair’s political beliefs are not on trial here,” Farren said. “Simply put, his political views are not relevant in this case.

“Mr. Sinclair has been charged with one count of theft [a felony]. As such, he is certainly entitled to defend himself vigorously against that charge. I am here to do everything within my power to provide Mr. Sinclair with a strong defensive effort in that regard and that’s what I intend to do.”

Sinclair was arrested last month on an outstanding warrant after a Washington, D.C., press conference.

According to Delaware State Police and Delaware Superior Court records, Sinclair allegedly paid for a three-week stay at a Rodeway Inn with $2,400 in money orders. The hotel manager later told police Wachovia refused to honor them.

Sinclair said he had been living in Delaware for about two months.

“I was actually living there and I was looking to remaining in the area, but the rents were just too high,” he said.


To this day there has not been a single Court document or charging document provided to me, my attorney or even found as part of the court file making the allegations that the News Journal has now made twice in less than two weeks.  Furthermore, the News Journal was faxed documentation showing their claims to be false.  I guess any coverage of the Obama matter is better than no coverage at all.  Guess the News Journal having papers served on them will make them think twice about repeating false claims that they were shown to be untrue about what I have been served with.  In fact now I challenge anyone in Delaware to produce a single item deposited into a Rodeway Inn account with my name on it.”

Read more about this story here:

Visit Larry Sinclair’s new website. It will be live soon:

5 responses to “Delaware and Chicago corruption, Attorney General Biden, Delaware News Journal lies about Larry Sinclair, Smears in Delaware from Bidens and Obama camp

  1. Hello Larry Supporters…PLEASE POST ON HERE…. Thanks!!!

  2. sisterrosetta

    (July 13, 2008) Obama = Sociopath? You Decide.
    2008-07-12 10:36pm PT


    Three or more of the following are required for such a diagnosis:

    1. Failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest;
    For Obama, this fits in with the Larry Sinclair allegations and the “sweetheart deal” he got for his house.

    2. Deceitfulness, as indicated by repeatedly lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure;
    Was Obama BORN Barack Hussein? Or was it Barry? Was he lying when he said his “finger slipped off the button” for some of his non-votes in the Illinois senate? Lying when he said he was a member of Rev. Wright’s church for 20 years and never knew what his “ministry” was about? There are many other examples too numerous to chronicle here.

    3. Impulsiveness or failure to plan ahead;
    In 2004 he said he wouldn’t run for President due to his inexperience. Seemingly on impulse, he changed his mind? He didn’t plan far enough ahead to “fix” the Rev. Wright problem before it became known, didn’t plan ahead in the “softening” of his wife to avoid her horrendous public statements, didn’t plan ahead on the flag pin wearing or the hand over the heart for the honor of our flag… and without a script or teleprompter to read from, stammers and fumbles for words.

    4. Irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults;
    Nothing documented here as yet, but his apparently hostile confrontation of Senator Lieberman on the Senate floor showed aggressiveness. His campaign surrogates’ misogyny towards Hillary Clinton, and their ageism towards McCain, do those trickle down from the top? He’s certainly never denounced either.

    5. Reckless disregard for safety of self or others;
    If the Larry Sinclair allegations are true, it’s clear Obama fits this profile.

    6. Consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations;
    Did he commit and agree to use public funding for his campaign then renege? Are his many absences throughout his career from his Senate duties both in Illinois and now, qualify as irresponsible? Will he be meeting with another Larry Sinclair as President?

    7. Lack of remorse (no empathy), as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another;
    His ability to throw people “under the bus” for financial and/or political gain is astounding.

    8. Superficial charm;
    Self explanatory. His public face he puts on is hollow, phony and superficial.

    9. A sense of extreme entitlement;
    Just read his book or even some excerpts, and you’ll make this connection.

    10. Persistent Lying or stealing;
    Look at the flip-flops Obama already has performed. Look at his lying about the Rev. Wright situation. Stealing? He was getting his “sweetheart deal” on his house while regular people were getting foreclosed on in record numbers; getting opponents removed from the ballot so he could steal his Illinois Senate seat.

  3. sisterrosetta

    Sunday, July 13, 2008

    Posted by Susan at 7:38 AM

    Larry Sinclair has received even more vile threats from people who are obviously deranged enough to commit illegal acts, whether or not the Obama campaign has sanctioned these threats.

    The bottom line is these trolls appear to be coordinating in some kind of campaign to force Sinclair to drop the lawsuit against the online cowards who libeled him. In doing so, they open themselves up to legal charges themselves.

    You just can’t say anything about anybody, especially somebody who is not a real public figure or is borderline public figure, even if you use a fake handle in making libelous remarks.

    Sisterrosetta here: I keep hearing references to “three innocent bloggers.” Admittedly, I am ignorant as to the exact details. But I keep asking myself, if they’re so innocent and in fact did nothing wrong, then why wasn’t suit thrown out long ago?

  4. Having visited his word press site I want to know just what the hell is going on here? Who is this John man? Why is he bullying Sinclair? What kind of America do we live in if you can manipulate the Justice System to attempt to keep soneone quiet. We need the Limo Driver and someone else who has had the same type of contact with OBAMA to role over on him publicly. If there were a group of 2 -3 with the same type of story it would be more noticable. This is just so unreal. If Sinclair was simply slandering Obama why haven’t the Obama Camp filed a lawsuit? Why all this wierd tatics to keep his name out of it? We need the WHOLE STORY NOW…. especially if we are all going to be targeted for just believing the guy should be able to speak out on an issue this close to America’s leadership. If they can bust the Gov of NY and Mayor of DC… they can bust open Obama he must be promising something in return of great value to someone… Maybe Aty Gen of the Country and VP slot for son Bidden and Father Bidden? What gives…. report all knowledge on this issue please!!!!

  5. I love when people are quoted and something like this is inserted [a felony].

    “Mr. Sinclair has been charged with one count of theft [a felony]. As such, he is certainly entitled to defend himself vigorously against that charge. I am here to do everything within my power to provide Mr. Sinclair with a strong defensive effort in that regard and that’s what I intend to do.”

    Did he mumble that or cough the words “a felony” into his hand? Or did he wave his hands in some manner to imply it? Or did the person doing the quoting infer it, then imply it (or rather just come out and say it) to the reader??

    Remember, the news gets about 3/4 of what they are reporting right. Out of the other ¾, half of that is biased in some way.

    Believe none of what you hear and only half of what you see. Even a camera can lie.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s