US Supreme Court declares Obama a liar, Obamacare is a tax, Obama lied about tax increases, Obama fraud and taxes have devastated economy and job market

US Supreme Court declares Obama a liar, Obamacare is a tax, Obama lied about tax increases, Obama fraud and taxes have devastated economy and job market

“But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.”…2001 Obama interview on Chicago public radio .

“I absolutely reject that notion [mandate is a tax].”…Barack Obama

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

All you need to know about Obama to understand what makes him tick is the following. Obama is a :

Narcissist.

Socialist.

Liar.

When Obama first began trying to force his socialist healthcare agenda upon us, it was clear that he was imposing another tax.

From The Blaze June 28, 2012.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/flashback-video-absolutely-reject-that-notion-obama-hhs-sec-budget-director-all-say-mandate-not-a-tax/

The US Supreme Court today, June 28, 2012, in their ruling today effectively called Obama a liar.

From Rush Limbaugh June 28, 2012.

“RUSH: Hey, folks, have you seen the economic news today? Have you heard about the unemployment numbers today? (laughing) Gross domestic product, have you heard about any of that? Because I have it here, and it sucks. It’s a disaster. The economy of this country remains a disaster. And we, the American people, have just been deceived in ways that nobody contemplated. And what we now have is the biggest tax increase in the history of the world. What we have been told by the chief justice of the Supreme Court and four liberals on the court: Obamacare is just a massive tax increase. That’s all it is. Obama lied to us about that. The Democrats lied. “It wasn’t a tax. There was no way it was a tax.”

The chief justice was hell-bent to find a way to make this law applicable, so he just decided, you know what, as a tax increase, it works, because there’s no limit on the federal government’s ability to tax. And it’s right there in the preamble of the Constitution, right there, Article 1, Section 8, the general welfare clause, it’s been established Congress can tax whatever, whoever, whenever, how much they want. Even when they don’t ask for it, the Supreme Court is gonna find a way to make what they want to do legal because John Roberts said it’s not our job here to forbid this. It’s not our job to protect people from outcomes. It’s not our job to determine whether it is right or wrong or any of that. We just get to look at it. We can’t forbid this. This is what the elected representatives of the people want.

No, the elected representatives of the people were deceived. Remember yesterday I asked you, if this decision went this way, what was your initial reaction going to be. And how many of you were deflated as you can be because of the way this was reported? The first thing that came down, the mandate, unconstitutional, that was the first thing everybody reported. Mandate unconstitutional, big sigh of relief. And then within moments, wait a minute, wait a minute, we’re reading further. Hold it just a second. The mandate’s unconstitutional, but the court has decided it’s a tax, and therefore it’s okay.

So Obamacare is nothing more than the largest tax increase in the history of the world. And the people who were characterizing it as such were right and were telling the truth. We have the biggest tax increase in the history of the world right in the middle of one of this country’s worst recessions. In fact, as the vice president said yesterday, a depression for millions of Americans. The chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Roberts, said, “It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.” Not our job.

Well, what about when we are deceived? The court upheld a law that was not what we were told it would be. What has been upheld here is fraud, and the Internal Revenue Service has just become Barack Obama’s domestic army. That is what we face now. We were deceived. Obamacare was a lie. It was a stealth tax on all Americans, and nobody knew it until today. Not officially. Obama told George Stephanopoulos it wasn’t a tax. And Stephanopoulos was trouble-making for trying to suggest otherwise.

Let’s go to the audio sound bites. September 20th, 2009, on This Week with George Stephanopoulos, interviewing President Obama, discussion about the health care reform bill, Stephanopoulos said, “Under this mandate, the government is forcing people to spend money and fining them if they don’t. How is that not a tax increase?”

OBAMA: No, tha-tha-that’s not true, George. Eh, for us to say that you’ve gotta take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase. What it’s saying is is that we’re not gonna have other people carrying your burdens for you, any more than the fact that right now everybody in America, just about, has to get auto insurance. Nobody considers that a tax increase. People say to themselves, “That is a fair way to make sure that if you hit my car, that I’m not covering all the costs.”

RUSH: Stephanopoulos then said, “Well, it may be fair, and it may be good public policy, but for you to say that this isn’t a tax. This just…”

OBAMA: No, no. B-b-but George y-y-y-you can’t just make up that language and decide that that’s called a tax increase.

STEPHANOPOULOS: I don’t think I’m making it up. Merriam-Webster Dictionary: “Tax: A charge, usually of money, imposed by authority —

OBAMA: (snickering)

STEPHANOPOULOS: — on persons or property for public purposes.”

OBAMA: George, the fact that you looked up Miriam’s dictionary (sic), the definition of tax increase indicates to me that you’re stretching a little bit right now. Otherwise you wouldn’ta gone to the dictionary to check on the definition! I mean —

STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, no.

OBAMA: If — if what you’re saying is —

STEPHANOPOULOS: I wanted to check for myself, but your critics say it is a tax increase.

OBAMA: My critics say everything’s a tax increase! My critics say that I’m taking over, uhh, every sector of the economy. You know that! Uh, eh, eh… Look, we can have a legitimate debate about whether or not we’re gonna have an individual mandate or not but —

STEPHANOPOULOS: But you reject that it’s a tax increase?

OBAMA: I absolutely reject that notion.”

Read more:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/06/28/the_court_rules_obamacare_is_the_largest_tax_increase_in_the_history_of_the_world

Some are fretting about this decision and the role Chief Justice Roberts played. I am not. Obama, et al have shot themselves in the foot and it is a near certainty that Obamacare will be repealed.

It is Obama’s tax and spend policies that have destroyed the economy and job market.

Now we have the US Supreme Court calling Obamacare what it is.

A big tax increase.

Thanks to commenter Starla, et al.

Advertisements

74 responses to “US Supreme Court declares Obama a liar, Obamacare is a tax, Obama lied about tax increases, Obama fraud and taxes have devastated economy and job market

  1. citizenwells

    I had pretty much decided what I was going to write in response to the Supreme Court ruling & then listened to Glenn Beck & Rush Limbaugh echo my sentiments. Obviously, any lucid thinking person paying attention is going to come to the same conclusion. This is another Obama lie except this time the Supreme Court has caught Obama in the lie. I see this a good thing overall. More to come

  2. To round out and balance our ever-increasing knowledge surrounding today’s decision, here is a good treatise by Thomas Crown, posted at the link below:

    I Am Down on John Roberts

    http://www.redstate.com/thomas/2012/06/28/i-am-down-on-john-roberts/

    (quote)
    “To preserve the Court’s institutional legacy, and to avoid an expansion of the Commerce Clause — a bete noire to the conservative movement for decades untold — he instead expanded the Taxation power. There is now literally no national policy that cannot be effected by placing in opposition to that policy a monstrously large tax, with the threat of fines, bankruptcy, and jail on the other side. None.

    The idea that the mandate is a tax, and one allowed by the Taxation power, is facially ridiculous: You face a tax for existence, and can only escape it by paying for private insurance.

    Taxation, as the Founders recognized, is an arrogation of power to the government. The power to tax is the power to control.

  3. Actually, the decision is not that glowing. John Roberts, undoubtedly had a gun put to his head not to embarrass the Usurper that he swore/ not swore in. The mental gymnastics that were gone thru to say that Congress did not mean that it was a penalty, but in an effort to find constitutionality “if possible”, it could be called a “tax” is astonishing. Have you ever paid a tax on something you didn’t buy? Me neither.
    He says that government influences you to buy something by the taxing power all the time— such as a tax on imports— but you don’t pay any tax on that if you don’t buy it. Or a tax on Cigarettes— again, you don’t pay a tax on cigarettes unless you buy them, although some people may buy less because of the tax.
    They struck down State Medicaid expansion, but said that Congress would have wanted to strike down the whole bill for that. WELL HOW WILL THEY PAY FOR IT THEN!!!!!
    Basically they struck down every aspect of the bill relating to how Congress passed it—
    Commerce Clause– Unconstitutional
    Necessary and Proper Clause—- Unconstitutional
    Penalty—- Unconstitutional
    Medicaid expansion—- Unconstitutional
    John Roberts sold out the country, and let the Marxists get their foot in the door with the Taxing Power. A tax paid on what you don’t buy– OMG. Now whether Congress can fund it w/o the States participation in Medicaid expansion is another story. This decision was totally about not embarrassing the Usurper, and it is far from a slam dunk, or a crowning achievement.

    “The Framers created a Federal Government of limited powers, and assigned to this Court the duty of enforcingthose limits. The Court does so today. But the Court does not express any opinion on the wisdom of the Affordable Care Act. Under the Constitution, that judgment is reserved to the people.
    The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is affirmed in part and reversed in part.”

  4. Truthbetold11

    This was a find any reason to pass this to give obama a chance to look legit before they rule on his natural born issue

  5. CW, your headline, “US Supreme Court declares Obama a liar”, is SO true!

    Yet I feel betrayed by Justice Roberts decision. I don’t know why, but I’m taking it personally. I thought (silly me) that he would understand the over reach. This is no longer the country I once knew.

  6. The House has just concluded it’s vote for CRIMINAL Contempt of Congress against Holder. The vote was:

    REPUBLICAN: yea: 239, Nay:1, NV:2

    DEMOCRAT: Yea:17, Nay: 65, Present: 1, NV:108

    The PRESENT VOTE MUST HAVE BEEN OBAMA WHO ALWAYS VOTES PRESENT…just a little humor on this humorless day.

  7. CW……………
    What the SCOTUS has either deliberately, or inadvertently done in my own opinion is to literally guarantee the WH to Romney. There is about 134 days remaining for the ramifications of this decision to ….SOAK INTO AMERICAN BRAINS. But I believe it will indeed soak in as the cost of our private healthcare rockets skyward. Private healthcare coverage is about to become extremely expensive!

  8. The door to removal of Holder is OPEN. It is almost IMPERATIVE that he be removed. He is an ACCESSORY to MURDER. Hopefully a Congressional Grand jury will be convened to forward a prosecution of Holder. If we are lucky we will watch Holder receive a lengthy vacation at Leavanworth.

  9. BYE BYE……..Time for me to get back to my grass shack at Bora Bora.

  10. before I leave I am thinking that we might compare Soetoro with George Herbert Walker Bush……”READ MY LIPS”…………………….

  11. “HEALTH CARE DISSENT: HERE’S WHAT THE CONSERVATIVE WING WANTED TO HAPPEN”

    By Ryan Grim

    Posted: 06/28/2012 1:02 pm
    Updated: 06/28/2012 3:02 pm

    “WASHINGTON — Mitt Romney, reacting to the Supreme Court’s health care ruling Thursday, said, “I agree with the dissent.”

    The dissent tosses out the entire health care law, dismissing the case for it as “feeble” and a “vast judicial overreach.” It argues that “against a mountain of evidence,” its backers offer only the “flimsiest of indications to the contrary.”

    Four of the five Republican appointees on the Court agreed with this interpretation, and it would have carried the day if Chief Justice John Roberts had joined them. Had he done so, the “entire statute” — meaning the entire law, from beginning to end — would have been invalidated, including provisions that had already gone into effect. Strangely, the dissenting justices argue that even constitutional provisions must be ruled unconstitutional because “the Act’s other provisions would not have been enacted without” it central elements, the mandate and the Medicaid provision. The justices never reveal how they know what would have happened in the alternate reality they posit.

    Did the minority’s uncompromising insistence on invalidating the entire law push Roberts to join the moderates in upholding it? We won’t know until the next tell-all book on the court, but below are excerpts from the dissent, signed by Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Antonin Scalia.”

    Read More Here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/28/health-care-dissent_n_1634514.html?icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl1|sec3_lnk1%26pLid%3D174223

    ===================================

    “JOHN ROBERTS OUTRAGES CONSERVATIVES IN HEALTH CARE RULING”

    “THE JUSTICE BEHIND THE SWING VOTE”

    “John Roberts was appointed by George W. Bush. His voting record has skewed conservative. But in a 5-4 vote on Obamacare, he shocked the nation.”

    By Luke Johnston

    Posted: 06/28/2012 1:50 pm
    Updated: 06/28/2012 2:05 pm

    “In his majority 5-4 opinion on Thursday, Chief Justice John Roberts upheld the constitutionality of the signature domestic policy achievement of President Barack Obama’s administration, the Affordable Care Act. In doing so, he and his court earned the ire of conservatives.

    “This was an activist court that you saw today,” Tea Party favorite Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) told reporters. “Anytime the Supreme Court renders something constitutional that is clearly unconstitutional, that undermines the credibility of the Supreme Court. I do believe the court’s credibility was undermined severely today,” she said, later adding that Congress could now force you to buy Ikea furniture.

    “The Supreme Court has abandoned us,” Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) said.

    “Today’s decision by the Supreme Court of the United States is simply disappointing,” Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) said. “I stand with Justice Kennedy that the entire act should have been held invalid.”

    Read More Here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/28/john-roberts-conservatives-health-care-ruling_n_1634512.html?icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl1|sec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D174223

    ==================================

  12. Thanks Cabby for the balancing reference point. I read what WHI had to say and I will agree that this shocker from the Supremes might be a fire under the seats of the opposition. But that’s the point….it still must be a fight. IF Roberts had joined the other Conservatives’ opinion that the whole thing was unconstitutional that fight wouldn’t still be necessary. And the Court would be to blame to the public. And there is the precedent now for any future liberal congress that they can order anything pleasing them, no matter the economic times, by a fiat of taxing. That’s extremely damaging to the limiting of powers of gov. in the Constitution. It’s gone when men lacking honor are in control.

    We have to also recognize that the public has not as yet experienced the real downside to this crazy mandate. They have experienced some of the provisions planned by the regime to go into action early in order to get the public used to these parts and not want to have them taken away. That part also enters into this fight because people won’t like hearing that they will have to give these things up….at least until something else replaces them.

    I don’t give Roberts any kudos for this ridiculous substitution of taxes to circumvent the Commerce Clause. You don’t tax people for something they don’t necessarily need or want….that began with ordering everyone to pay for special interests’ proclivities like Planned Parenthood to perform activities extremely morally repugnant to so many. And I don’t believe the mandated taxes will end the war against the freedom of religion. The public has NOT been represented in ordering this giant tax and “no taxation without representation”! We were told to “take it and like it” by madame Pillousy. I suppose if everyone refused to pay they might have a problem building the jails to hold them all.

  13. Just after the SCOTUS opinion, Romney has raised 1.5 million dollars…It might be good for Obama today but it is going to cost him the election.

  14. Did Roberts Give in to Obama’s Bullying?

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/28/Did-Roberts-Give-in-to-Obama-Bullying

    Congress did not intend the individual mandate to be a tax–neither in the text of the legislation, nor in its public deliberations inside and outside the Capitol.
    snip
    while this opinion has the form of deference, in substance it is the opposite of deferential, rewriting Obamacare by judicial fiat.

    This should now be called the SCOTUS healthcare bill while their very own nemesis who takes them down during State of the Union speeches will take the credit!!

  15. “CONGRESS VOTES ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER IN CRIMINAL CONTEMPT”

    Katie Pavlich
    News Editor, Townhall

    June 28, 2012 04:41 PM EST

    “We must repeal Obamacare! Sign the petition!

    “UPDATE II: The House has voted to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in civil contempt, in addition to criminal contempt. Twenty-one Democrats voted with Republicans for civil contempt. Civil contempt will allow the Oversight Committee to proceed with their quest for documents in front of a judge, rather than simply relying on the U.S. Attorney in Washington D.C. to assess the charge. More: ”

    […]

    “After 18 months of investigation and non-responses to Congressional subpoenas about Operation Fast and Furious, the House of Representatives has voted to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in criminal contempt. The vote was bipartisan with 17 Democrats voting with Republicans. The final vote tally was 255 yeas, 67 nays and 110 members didn’t vote. Many members of the Congressional Black Caucus and Democrats walked out of the vote in protest. Holder is the first sitting attorney general to be held in contempt and the first sitting cabinet member to be held in contempt. The criminal contempt charge will now move to the U.S. Attorney in Washington D.C. for review.

    Chairman of the House Oversight Committee Darrell Issa offered to delay or cancel the contempt vote today, so long as Attorney General Eric Holder delivered 1300 documents as part of compliance with a 22 part October 2011 subpoena regarding Operation Fast and Furious. After a series of last minute meetings and efforts to prevent the vote, Holder failed to deliver those documents and the House proceeded as planned.”

    See The Article Here;

    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/06/28/congress_votes_holder_in_criminal_contempt

  16. Globe has an update ping.

    Forger Nailed in Obama Birth Probe

    A crack team of law enforcement investigators has tracked down TWO men they’re convinced played a part in the forgery of President Barack Obama’s Hawaiian birth certificate – and the White House is reeling! Only GLOBE has blockbuster details about the probe into the President birth’s papers – PLUS a stunning photo re-enactment of the moment investigators closed in on one of the two suspects.

  17. “THE ROBERTS OPINION: IT’S NOT ALL BAD”

    Kate Hicks
    Web Editor, Townhall.com

    “So, is this what the right really wanted to hear? Heck no! We like the dissent, where the whole thing goes. But Roberts is dumb like a fox, and it’s worth looking at the effects this ruling will have on the future, both near and far.

    The Upshot”

    Read More Here:

    http://townhall.com/columnists/katehicks/2012/06/28/the_roberts_opinion_its_not_all_bad/page/full/

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    I do not agree with this writer in many ways.

  18. According to Krauthammer Roberts feels responsible for the Court’s reputation and he probably felt that the Bush Gore decision made the court look too political and so he did not want the court to look again like it sided politically again but did not want to side with the commerce clause power so he went with the Congress’ right to tax. He had to really invent an argument to do that.

  19. I wonder what Drudge is inferring with its current picture of Roberts swearing in Obama!

  20. Another approach being tried:

    Michael Savage: Roberts Epilepsy Medication Affects His Cognition

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/06/28/michael_savage_roberts_epilepsy_medication_effects_his_cognition.html

    Roberts Facing Medical Option on 2nd Seizure

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/01/health/01seizure.html?_r=1

  21. observer | June 28, 2012 at 6:23 pm |

    Globe has an update ping.

    Forger Nailed in Obama Birth Probe

    A crack team of law enforcement investigators has tracked down TWO men they’re convinced played a part in the forgery of President Barack Obama’s Hawaiian birth certificate – and the White House is reeling! Only GLOBE has blockbuster details about the probe into the President birth’s papers – PLUS a stunning photo re-enactment of the moment investigators closed in on one of the two suspects.

    _________________
    Oldsalt said many many months ago that the BIG story would probably be broken by one of these tabloid papers like the Enquirer that broke the John Edwards story. The Globe? Can you give us a linK? Thanks, Observer.

    Dualer, you are right on the money!
    “Have you ever paid a tax on something you didn’t buy? Me neither.”

  22. citizenwells | June 28, 2012 at 7:24 pm | http://www.globemagazine.com/story/852

    ______________________________
    Yep, thanks!

  23. observer | June 28, 2012 at 5:25 pm |
    ………I don’t give Roberts any kudos for this ridiculous substitution of taxes to circumvent the Commerce Clause. You don’t tax people for something they don’t necessarily need or want…
    *********************************
    Observer, your post is a very good one. Today I have run the gamut like a swinging pendulum, as the different facets of this decision come to light.

    Right now, after somewhat digesting what has transpired, I am coming to the conclusion (based on outside sources and my own noggin) that Roberts has tried hard to keep the court from appearing political, because, as Chief Justice, he feels responsible for the public perception that the Court generates, such as what happened in 2000 when the Bush/Gore debacle took place.

    According to former Attorney General Gonzales, who said he thoroughly vetted Roberts before nominated, he was impressed with Roberts approach to deciding cases – often novel and with the least amount of flack.
    (My words, not his)

    It seems, therefore, that Roberts, by inserting a number of unusual phrases in his opinion, was attempting to set the precedent for limiting the application of the Commerce Clause, and he did just that. HOWEVER, to accomplish that, he concocted (Charles Krauthammer’s word) this taxation power.

    To me, a whole new can of worms has been created by giving Congress the idea that any policy they want to institute can be accomplished by taxation. This is a dangerous path, and one that Congress will probably be only too gratified to use, judging by its past behavior.

    Personally the judgment of Justice Kennedy (what a surprise!) and the other three would have been the best for the country by far.

    We may never know whether Roberts was sincere in his so-called clever scheme or not. What we do know is that the country is worse off today because he did not follow the path of the other four. At least, that is my feeling now.

  24. John in Illinois

    Does anyone feel like they have been “raped” ? And the perp didn’t even say “thanks”.If there ever was a time for a real hero now is the time to expose this regime! Come on Sheriff Joe and Mike Zulo,please find a way to expose these thugs!

  25. Bernanke tells Congress, “Auditing the Fed will collapse the US economy”

    http://www.vidvid.info/0e604182c.html

    Video Description :
    “Bernanke Threatens The Congress” We will cause an Economic Collapse if you audit the Fed! “Bernanke Threatens The Congress” We will cause an Economic Collapse if you audit the Fed! Rep. Duncan questioned Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke on Thursday about what his opinion of a majority in Congress who have co-sponsored Ron Pauls bill to audit the Federal Reserve. Bernanke clearly regarded the bills intent as hostile to the institution he represents: “My concern about the legislation is that if the GAO is auditing not only the operational aspects of the programs and the details of the programs but making judgments about our policy decisions would effectively be a takeover of policy by the Congress and a repudiation of the Federal Reserve would be highly destructive to the stability of the financial system, the Dollar and our national economic situation.” The brunt of Bernankes statement is as crystal clear as a threat from a common street thug back off from the Fed, or the economy gets it. The chairman clearly implies that any attempt to restore monetary powers constitutionally granted to the Congress would be seen as a “takeover” and that the defensive and “repudiated” Fed would respond destructively. Of course Congress constitutional power over money is in the U.S. Constitution: The Congress shall have power To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures; Bernankes open use of financial terrorism in the face of Congress blatant Constitutional authority is absurd and despicable.

    http://www.vidvid.info/0e604182c.html

  26. QUESTION:

    if it is a TAX, does NOT CONGRESS and SENATE in particular

    HAVE TO PASS IT WITH 2/3rd majority ??? Doesn’t the SENATE need 60 votes to do it? Did they have it at the time it was passed??

    HELP !!

  27. Rush Limbaugh about SCOTUS ObamaCare Decision

  28. no CW i don’t agree that roberts is calling obama a liar

    obama has an easy out on it “Roberts called it a tax, I never did”

    try again

    i like the medication angle above

    it was obvious was roberts decision was going to be based upon
    his Arizona flub earlier in the week

    he flip flopped on both

    the only way to change this is to get obama out
    and that is now going to be a high mountain to climb
    as the DEMS will energize their base with BO lies
    to get them out to vote to KEEP the FREEBEEs coming

  29. bob strauss

    Now, if it is shown Obama is not a Citizen of the U.S.A., has a forged BC, and Selective Service card, and is using a stolen Social Security card, then his nomination of Sotomayer and Kagen to the SCOTUS is void, and the recent decision on health care is void also.

    Go sheriff Joe!

  30. If the nation collapsed tomorrow, no SS checks, no disability, no more pensions, 401s, no gas stations open, no jobs to go to, no banks open, no atms, no credit cards accepted…
    how much food and supplies are in your house??

  31. Bob,
    Hopefully your projection would come true, but don’t count on it, simply because some RINOS in their shining armor will come riding in to save the country from a “constitutional crisis”.

    I doubt very much that any appointments or laws will be overturned even if Obama were to be impeached. There is just too much fear of backlash. The problem is that they are afraid of the wrong people. They should be afraid of us! Nothing spectacular is going to happen until they feel OUR heat.

  32. Have you ever paid a tax on something you didn’t buy? Me neither.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Is why I REFUSE to call it a tax–it’s a fine, plain and simple!!!

  33. JayJay | June 28, 2012 at 8:53 pm |

    If the nation collapsed tomorrow, no SS checks, no disability, no more pensions, 401s, no gas stations open, no jobs to go to, no banks open, no atms, no credit cards accepted…
    how much food and supplies are in your house??
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    I’m ready…..let’s get it on….the sooner the better then the NEW system can start!

  34. Revenge tothe max= going to my Democrat idiot neighbors bragging that with our negative earnings of -27,000 for the year of 2011, they can now pay for my and dh’s healthcare!
    Like it??

  35. bob strauss

    Cabby – AZ | June 28, 2012 at 8:54 pm |

    Bob,
    Hopefully your projection would come true, but don’t count on it, simply because some RINOS in their shining armor will come riding in to save the country from a “constitutional crisis”.

    I doubt very much that any appointments or laws will be overturned even if Obama were to be impeached. There is just too much fear of backlash. The problem is that they are afraid of the wrong people. They should be afraid of us! Nothing spectacular is going to happen until they feel OUR heat.
    *****************************
    Cabby, if it can be established that Obama is not a Citizen, we can get rid of the usurper without impeachment proceedings, and take Harry Reid and the Senate, as well as the House out of it, and declare Obama’s $hit VOID!

  36. Peter Schiff breaks down the SCOTUS Ruling

    Two wrongs do not make a right. The fine for not buying health insurance is not a tax, its a penalty. And even if it is a tax, its unconstitutional anyway, as its a direct tax that must be apportioned. The Supreme Court is wrong twice.
    You can catch The Schiff Report live on weekdays, 10am-noon, here.

    http://iroots.org/2012/06/28/peter-schiff-breaks-down-the-scotus-ruling/

  37. Congressman Ron Paul also issued a statement:

    I strongly disagree with today’s decision by the Supreme Court, but I am not surprised. The Court has a dismal record when it comes to protecting liberty against unconstitutional excesses by Congress.

    Today we should remember that virtually everything government does is a ‘mandate.’ The issue is not whether Congress can compel commerce by forcing you to buy insurance, or simply compel you to pay a tax if you don’t. The issue is that this compulsion implies the use of government force against those who refuse. The fundamental hallmark of a free society should be the rejection of force. In a free society, therefore, individuals could opt out of “Obamacare” without paying a government tribute.

    Those of us in Congress who believe in individual liberty must work tirelessly to repeal this national health care law and reduce federal involvement in healthcare generally. Obamacare can only increase third party interference in the doctor-patient relationship, increase costs, and reduce the quality of care. Only free market medicine can restore the critical independence of doctors, reduce costs through real competition and price sensitivity, and eliminate enormous paperwork burdens. Americans will opt out of Obamacare with or without Congress, but we can seize the opportunity today by crafting the legal framework to allow them to do so.

  38. jacqlynsmith | June 28, 2012 at 8:58 pm

    I’m always ignored on this blog,…..I seriously pray these people here have more than 6 months supplies…please get supplies, people.
    St Louis military wasn’t there for nothing last week.

  39. Following today’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Obamacare, Sen. Rand Paul offered the following statement:

    Just because a couple people on the Supreme Court declare something to be ‘constitutional’ does not make it so. The whole thing remains unconstitutional. While the court may have erroneously come to the conclusion that the law is allowable, it certainly does nothing to make this mandate or government takeover of our health care right…

    “Obamacare is wrong for Americans. It will destroy our health care system. This now means we fight every hour, every day until November to elect a new President and a new Senate to repeal Obamacare…

  40. ”Roberts contorts the tax clause beyond recognition” according to Mark Levin….very good: ”decision so absurd that if I was John Roberts I’d be ashamed to have my name on it!” Calling it even ”lawless”.

    Explains the allowable taxing under the Constitution….and this isn’t one of them:

    http://marklevinshow.com/Article.asp?id=2484259&spid=32364

  41. WND EXCLUSIVE

    “RULING AWAKEN ‘REVOLUTIONARY FERVOR'”

    “OBAMACARE DECISION WILL ‘SWEEP’ OBAMA, DEMOCRATS FROM POWER”

    By Art Moore
    June 28, 2012

    “Let us pray for our nation,” she continued. “We must remember in these dark days that, while we are proud to be Americans, our primary loyalty is to God, not man and surely not the government. Civil disobedience appears to be one of the few options we have, and we say bring it.”

    National Right to Life President Carol Tobias warned that if President Obama wins re-election, “it will mean massive abortion subsidies, and it will put the lives of millions at risk through systematic government-imposed rationing of lifesaving medical care.”

    She said the ruling today is a “call-to-action for the right-to-life electorate to work to elect a Congress and president this November committed to repealing Obamacare in 2013.”

    See The Entire Article Here:

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/after-the-ruling-the-battle-isnt-over/?cat_orig=politics

    =================================

  42. WND EXCLUSIVE

    “MICHAEL SAVAGE: ROBERTS AFFECTED BY MEDICATION”

    “SWING VOTE IN OBAMACARE CASE SUFFERED EPILEPTIC SEIZURES”

    “Savage told his “Savage Nation” listeners that on the way to the studio for his program tonight he visited a world famous neurologist he knows, and they talked about Obamacare.

    The physician urged Savage to check out Roberts’ history with epilepsy, referring him to a New York Times report in August 2007. The article said that after Roberts suffered a seizure, doctors were weighing whether to treat him with powerful drugs with “troubling side effects,” including mental slowing and forgetfulness.

    Roberts had suffered a seizure 14 years earlier. The seizures meet the criteria for epilepsy, the Times report said, because they were “unprovoked,” meaning that they were not caused by a head injury, a drug reaction or another known factor.

    The neurologist told Savage that Roberts’ cognition could be affected by taking epilepsy medicine.

    “I’m going to tell you something that you’re not going to hear anywhere else, that you must pay attention to,” Savage said.

    “It’s well known that Roberts, unfortunately for him, has suffered from epileptic seizures. Therefore he has been on medication.”

    Savage said that “if you look at Roberts’ writings you can the cognitive disassociation in what he is saying.”

    “Roberts has no logic in what he said,” Savage asserted.

    “He said the law is a tax, but if the law wasn’t written as a tax, how can he say it’s taxation?”

    See The Entire Article Here:
    http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/michael-savage-roberts-affected-by-medication/

    =========================

    WND RADIO

    “CONGRESSMAN: ‘KICKED IN STOMACH’ BY RULING”

    “REP. LUNGREN SAYS ROBERTS ‘STRETCHING’ TO FIND PLAN CONSTITUTIONAL”

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/congressman-kicked-in-stomach-by-ruling/?cat_orig=us

    =========================

    WND RADIO

    “RAND PAUL: ‘THE BATTLE STARTS TODAY'”

    “SENATOR RIPS ‘BIG HEARTS, SMALL MINDS’ BEHIND OBAMACARE”

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/rand-paul-the-battle-starts-today/

  43. Michael Savage:

    “[…] “Roberts is a compromised Supreme Court justice.”

    He predicted Obamacare will bankrupt America.

    “Who is going to pay for the fraud, waste and corruption called Obamacare?” he asked.

    Savage argued that the same people who are failing to control Medicare and Medicaid are in charge of trying to control Obamacare.

    “America is over as you know it,” he said.

    A plan to get rid of Obamacare:”

    See The Entire Article Here:
    http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/michael-savage-roberts-affected-by-medication/

  44. Philo. Great article. I new it kind of needed to pass now so americans can rslly agianst it. And blame dems for raising taxes brilliant. It was like sporting event and a team won the game with a hail mary. But will lose all the next games they play against each other.

  45. From: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com

    Ocassionally I listen to Rush Limbaugh’s radio show. I listened to him today on the radio and I agree with what he said here:

    “WHAT HAPPENED TO JOHN ROBERTS?”

    June 28, 2012

    Read The Transcript Of Today’s June 28, 2012 Rush Limbaugh Show Here:

    BEGIN TRANSCRIPT:

    Excerpted:

    “RUSH: […] “It does not have the force power, but the four judges, justices who dissented — Scalia, Alito, Thomas, Kennedy — made it plain in their dissent that there was nothing legal and constitutional about this act. They found nothing in it legal and constitutional. They plainly said, in their dissent, the whole thing should have been tossed out. You can’t have a greater divide than what we had. You’ve got the four libs, who, it’s never even considered that they might change their tune.

    And the chief justice, who we know now I think is a creature of the Washington establishment, a creature of the notion that government is the center of the universe. It’s pretty obvious. But the four justices who dissented, they didn’t even want to get into the idiosyncrasies of the majority opinion. They found the whole thing tossable.”

    […]

    “I think Chief Justice Roberts is establishing his legacy. I think it’s what he wanted to do. I think this is his imprimatur. This is The Roberts Court, like we had The Warren Court and we had The Rehnquist Court. This is The Roberts Court. This is his stamp on it.”

    “Here’s what happened. The Supreme Court, a majority of the Supreme Court, found Obamacare unconstitutional. They found the mandate unconstitutional. The chief justice, John Roberts, kicked into activist mode and found a way around that. I don’t care if he found a way around it because he was intimidated by Obama, or Patrick Leahy, or somebody in the media. I don’t care.

    Because I don’t think he was. I think he did what he wanted to do. He has sided with the liberal justices more often than not in previous decisions. I just throw that out as a statistic, not as evidence. I think he’s building a legacy. This is what he, [Roberts] wanted to happen. He found a way for it to happen.

    And so now, folks, it’s game on. And I know some of you may get sick and tired of always being in this position. Why is it always game on? Why is it always us that have to do — well, it’s the way of the world. It’s simply the reality we face today.

    We are up against people who believe in tyranny. We are up against people who do not want there to be individual freedom and liberty in this country. That’s what we face. We don’t face people who like a level playing field with the will of the people being the determining factor. It’s not the people we’re up against.

    We’re up against people who do not like the US Constitution. We’re up against people who do not like this country as founded. We’re up against people who want to change it. They have not liked it for a long time or they’ve never liked it. We don’t have time to try to analyze why. We don’t have time to try to figure out how they ended up being this way.”

    “We now are governed by a monstrous assault on our personal liberty and freedom. We are governed by it. We are living under its thumb. Jackboot. And it is now time to wrap this monstrosity around Obama’s head. He will not tell anybody what this bill means.

    It’s up to us. And we can’t even count on Romney to do this. All we can do is hope that he gets it right. We have to tell people what this bill is, and we have to be able to show them and tell them that’s what this bill is and explain it.

    This bill is death panels. This bill is massive taxes on our behavior. We have to be able to explain that what happened today does not mean free health care for the poor. If anything, it means the poor will lose their health care, what with this Medicaid expansion.”

    Con’t 1 of 2

  46. Kinda of like from here to election. 45 to1

  47. “WHAT HAPPENED TO JOHN ROBERTS?”

    June 28, 2012

    Read The Transcript Of Today’s June 28, 2012 Rush Limbaugh Show Here:

    2 of 2

    Excerpted:

    Rush Limbaugh:

    “We have death panels now. We have massive taxes, tax increases. We have taxes on our behavior. We have a tax if we choose not to have health insurance. You young people who don’t want to buy health insurance because you don’t need it yet. Too bad. If you don’t, you pay a fine, and there are 16,000 IRS agents newly hired who are going to be enforcing this thing. There are 2700 pages in this monstrosity. There are going to be regulations that haven’t even been dreamed up yet because, as the bill states countless times, “As the secretary shall determine.” The secretary of Health and Human Services can pretty much write the law as he or she goes.

    There will be denial of care. Not everybody’s gonna get health care, whether they’re insured or not. It’s gonna be determined that some people’s health care is not worth the cost, either the disease is too far advanced or the disease is too far advanced and they’re too old, or perhaps they’re not of the right political party. Don’t you dare discount that.

    We are up against people who want us — Artur Davis is exactly right — marginalized. Half of this country they want marginalized as extreme wacko alien kooks. These are people that would be happy to deny your grandmother health coverage if you didn’t vote for Obama, and I am not exaggerating. These are people who itch, bureaucrats and so forth, who itch for that kind of power over people. This law provides it.

    Rationing, it’s all part of the mix. We’re $16 trillion in debt. Not everybody’s gonna get health care. And I don’t care what Obama says, not everybody’s gonna get the best health care. Not everybody’s gonna get equal health care. Not everybody’s gonna get equal insurance. Nothing Obama says about this has very much relationship to the truth. You’re not gonna hear about any of this stuff that I’m telling you. But it is game on. We’re gonna have price controls, because premiums and things, prices of health care are going to skyrocket. And these experts, these statists, the people who want total dominion and control over your life are gonna be shocked, because some of these people are true believers and they really believe all the propaganda.

    They believe it’s gonna be cheaper. They believe it’s gonna get more plentiful, and when it doesn’t they are going to be shocked and stunned and they’re not going to understand it, just like when every other program of theirs fails, they’re clueless. All they want is credit for their good intentions. But they’re gonna have to deal with the failure. They’re gonna have to deal with the problems this bill creates. So there will be rationing. There will be price controls. There will be massive deficits.

    And all of this needs to be wrapped around the head of Barack Obama and every Democrat running for reelection who supported this thing, which is every one of ’em. That’s where we are. That’s what this is, and now this precedent, set by this ruling today, where the government can tax behavior, not just your income, not just your user fee at a public park or a federal park, or not just your gasoline tax. Now sky’s the limit. Whatever they want to tax, they can. That was just affirmed via this decision today.

    Now, I must say there are some people out there… It doesn’t matter who. And this is quite natural, too. I understand this psychologically. There are people who are trying to point out positive aspects in the Roberts ruling. There are people who are saying, “We gotta be very careful, Rush! John Roberts is a George Bush appointee. We don’t want to dump on John Roberts.”

    Um, sorry. This is an appalling, disgraceful decision — and it’s going to be remembered as such.

    This decision, this ruling originally was found to be unconstitutional. According to the Commerce Clause, it was unconstitutional. And what happened was the chief judge found a way, going activist, to make sure this bill survived. And it was the chief justice who accepted a very little used administration argument that, “Hey, it’s tax,” even though we played the tape where Obama said it wasn’t a tax. He went to the mat telling George Stephanopoulos in 2009, “It’s not a tax increase, George.”

    They knew that if this bill were sold as a tax increase, it’d fail.

    Obama was out there saying, “Nobody who makes under $200,000 a year will see their taxes go up as long as I’m president.” Everybody’s taxes go up and sometimes monstrously high here. Obama went to the end of the world trying to convince people this is not a tax increase. And when the mandate was running into trouble, then they tried to say, “Well, maybe it is a tax.” They sent their little Verrilli up to the court to argue, “It could be a tax.” They weren’t excited about it. They didn’t want to sell it that way.

    It turns out they didn’t have to. The chief judge found it! He said (summarized), “You know what? I’m just gonna call it a tax. The government can do that. They can’t make everybody buy health insurance with the mandate, but they can with the tax code.” That’s what happened today. It’s an appalling, disgraceful decision.

    END TRANSCRIPT”

    See The Article Here:

    http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/06/28/what_happened_to_john_roberts

  48. “OUR ONLY CHOICE: WIN ELECTIONS”

    Read The Transcript Of Today’s June 28, 2012 Rush Limbaugh Show Here:

    BEGIN TRANSCRIPT:

    “And so now it’s game on. This thing has to be repealed. It has to be repealed by the elected representatives of the people. And that can only happen if the election results are massively in our favor in November. That’s the next task. And I’m confident that what happened in 2010 is gonna happen with greater intensity and in larger numbers in 2012 than happened in 2010. I’m talking about the midterm elections: The Tea Party and everybody mobilizing.

    The Constitution was written to limit government power.

    This ruling expands government power like no one has ever imagined.

    This ruling expands government power like nobody’s ever asked for it before!

    Obama didn’t even ask for this. He didn’t ask for this kind of massive tax increase. He asked for the Commerce Clause to be able to force people to buy insurance — and then what that would open in terms of future doors. It’s an appalling decision, and there’s nothing in it that (sigh) you can grasp onto and try to find some positives. Unless you want to. It’s not gonna mean anything. My point is, no Founding Father would envision a constitution written this way.

    Nobody envisioned a constitution or a government with this kind of power.

    BREAK TRANSCRIPT

    RUSH: Ladies and gentlemen, we are not, as a people, as free as we were at 10:15 this morning. We didn’t lose a war. No foreign enemy is taking away our liberties. Our own government did this. We’re not nearly as free as we were five hours ago.

    END TRANSCRIPT”

    http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/06/28/our_only_choice_win_elections

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    “CALLERS WEIGH IN ON OBAMACARE RULING”

    Rush Limbaugh Radio Show
    June 28, 2012

    “BEGIN TRANSCRIPT:

    “RUSH: I know you want to weigh in on this. So we’re gonna start now with Bob in Oxford, Pennsylvania. Hello, sir. Welcome to the program.

    CALLER: Thank you, Rush. It’s a privilege and an honor.

    RUSH: Thank you very much, sir.

    CALLER: A longtime listener. You made a statement early in your monologue that the Constitution’s under assault. Well, I really don’t think it’s under assault anymore. The Supreme Court just lit the last match to burn it up completely. Our Founding Fathers put forth our Constitution to protect individuals and the states from an all-power federal government. And now we’re no longer protected. This federal government can now do whatever it wants to limit whatever it wants to limit us from doing, and impose a tax on it and say, “Hey, we’re allowed to do it.”

    RUSH: For now, that’s true, folks. For now, that’s true.

    CALLER: I mean —

    RUSH: It’s all right there. It’s in the Preamble. Article I, Section 8: The General Welfare Clause. I remember talking to people about “the general welfare.” I had an argument with people when I was much, much younger saying, “No, general welfare is not welfare programs. General welfare is not government taking care of us.” It’s become that! That’s exactly what it’s become.

    CALLER: That’s right.

    RUSH: It’s become that the federal government has the power to tax us, to spend the money for any reason, and there are no limits whatsoever.

    CALLER: Right, and that last limit has just been removed.

    RUSH: Now even when they don’t ask for it as such, in order save themselves from themselves the Supreme Court calls it a tax.

    CALLER: Yeah. I mean, it’s amazing. I mean, in the last 3-1/2 years I feel like I’ve been living in an alternative universe and it’s turning out to be a Looney Tunes cartoon. We’ve got Looney Tunes economics and everything’s Looney Tunes. I don’t know which cartoon character we’re dealing with anymore. You know, I’d rather have Daffy Duck in the White House than the guy we have right now. He could probably do a better job.

    RUSH: Yeah. The problem is, it’s not a cartoon.”

    http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/06/28/callers_weigh_in_on_obamacare_ruling

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  49. “PEARLS OF WISDOM”

    From: Rush Limbaugh’s June 28, 2012 Show:

    “What we now have is the biggest tax increase in the history of the world. That’s all Obamacare is.”

    “Today, our freedom of choice as Americans met its death panel: the Supreme Court of the United States.”

    “November is the chance to get rid of the people who did this, and then put in place people we hope mean it when they say they’re going to repeal it.”

    “We’ve now been taxed into disposable income hell. The Constitution’s under assault, and so is every individual living here under assault.”

    “We have been betrayed and deceived by Congress. We have been betrayed and deceived by the Supreme Court. It was never contemplated that Obamacare was a massive tax increase.”

    “The court upheld a law that was not what we were told it would be. What has been upheld here is fraud, and the Internal Revenue Service has just become Barack Obama’s domestic army.”

    “Even when they don’t ask for it, the Supreme Court is gonna find a way to make what they want to do legal because John Roberts said it’s not our job here to forbid this. It’s not our job to protect people from outcomes.”

    “Obamacare is nothing more than the largest tax increase in the history of the world. And the people who were characterizing it as such were right and were telling the truth. We have the biggest tax increase in the history of the world right in the middle of one of this country’s worst recessions.”

    “Obama’s got nothing to defend. He can go out there and defend this bill all day long, but the number of people who don’t want any part of it just multiplied.”

    “So what we get today with the Obamacare ruling is the largest tax in the history of the world is going to be paid by the uninsured, the very people Obama is supposed to help.”

    “The country is in a very dangerous and precarious place, and it really is hanging by a thread. And that thread is either going to unravel in November or it’s going to get stronger and we start sewing things back together.”

    “The Tea Party never went away. The left hopes that it did. The left tried to tell themselves that it went away, but it didn’t. It just transformed. It started as a protest movement and now is eventually a grassroots movement designed to find nominees and then get them elected.”

    “Look, I’m in the tea business now, I’m a tea expert, and I happen to know what happens when you boil tea. It gets stronger. That’s how you make it stronger. You boil it. You steep it. You leave it in the hot water. And it gets stronger. And that’s exactly what is going to happen now. It’s happening even now, as we speak.”

    “Arizona dared to stand up to The One, and now Arizona essentially has no border. And all this is being done under the rubric of social justice.”

    “When the federal government has the power to tax behavior, there is no end to what can be taxed. And that’s what Obamacare was always about from the get-go.”

    “It’s gonna be many more than 20 million people who will lose employer-provided health insurance and who will then be forced to go elsewhere to get it. And if you don’t? If you don’t, there’s the fine. That’s what happened today.”

    “It’s the Constitution that’s hanging by a thread and all the rest of us with it.”

    “We are up against people who believe in tyranny. We are up against people who do not want there to be individual freedom and liberty in this country.”

    “This bill is death panels. This bill is massive taxes on our behavior. We have to be able to explain that what happened today does not mean free health care for the poor. If anything, it means the poor will lose their health care, what with this Medicaid expansion.”

    “We’re $16 trillion in debt. Not everybody’s gonna get health care. And I don’t care what Obama says, not everybody’s gonna get the best health care. Not everybody’s gonna get equal health care.”

    “I know there’s a temptation to try to explain the inexplicable, to try to find a silver lining to grasp and hold onto and so forth. And if that makes you feel better, go ahead, but it doesn’t matter. The ruling is the ruling, and it stands. And so now it’s game on.”

    “The Constitution was written to limit government power. This ruling expands government power like no one has ever imagined. This ruling expands government power like nobody’s ever asked for it before!”

    “Ladies and gentlemen, we are not, as a people, as free as we were at 10:15 this morning. We didn’t lose a war. No foreign enemy is taking away our liberties. Our own government did this. We’re not nearly as free as we were five hours ago.”

    http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/06/28/pearls_of_wisdom

  50. Romney should choose Rand Paul as his running mate.

  51. Mark Levin’s Epic Rant On Obamacare And Tyranny

    June 27, 2012

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Mark Levin: Obama Is Now At War With State And Local Law Enforcement

    June 25, 2012

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Mark Levin Analyzes The Supreme Court Ruling On SB-1070 Arizona Law – Part 1

    June 25, 2012

  52. Mark Levin Analyzes The Supreme Court Ruling On SB-1070 Arizona Law – Part 2

    June 25, 2012

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Mark Levin Analyzes The Supreme Court Ruling On SB-1070 Arizona Law – Part 3

    June 25, 2012

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Book Trailer: “Death Panels” by Michelle Buckman

  53. JayJay | June 28, 2012 at 9:43 pm |

    jacqlynsmith | June 28, 2012 at 8:58 pm

    I’m always ignored on this blog,…..I seriously pray these people here have more than 6 months supplies…please get supplies, people.
    St Louis military wasn’t there for nothing last week.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Don’t worry Jay Jay….i’m lucky to get a comment that posts….everything I post goes into moderation and occasionally something gets seen. I have answered you before but it didn’t show! Glad you are ready….I am too! 🙂

  54. “A TRIP DOWN MEMORY LANE WITH MARK LEVIN AND THE ELIGIBILITY ISSUE…NO DIALOGUE ALLOWED…”

    “Mark Levin is known to hang up in your face if you mention Obama’s eligibility issue”

    http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2011/10/trip-down-memory-lane-with-mark-levine.html

  55. Good morning,

    Forgive my typing I’m on my cell.

    Has anybody noticed that conservative justices wrote their opinions as the “Majority”, and the liberal justices wrote their opinions as the dissenting???

    That means justice Roberts “switched” in the very last min….

    Additionally, even if it were a tax, that would have meant SCOTUS had no power to even rule until “After” 2014, when the so called tax takes effect. Hense Roberts erred by even ruling on the matter by calling it a tax..

    By Roberts perhaps in trying to preserve the courts integrity by not appearing to mostly shooting down liberal policies, shot himself in the foot instead and of the American people. He also opened the door for future congresses to lie about policy and simply allow the court to call anything a tax without proper procedure….

    Lastly, this does Romney no big favors. As everyone should have noticed in both Obama’s and Mitt’s speaches yesterday, neither of them mentioned the word tax, not once.

    The reason is simple. If Mitt even so much as calls this a tax, then the liberals can and will point to Romneycare as a massive tax increase. It would make the liberal case for them by saying massive tax increases is how you balance the budget, same as Romney did.

    That is why Romney cannot use this ruling other than to say repeal it…. Roberts did not do Romney any favors even if he meant to.

  56. Interested Bystander

    Good morning ALL,

    Cabby commented:

    “To me, a whole new can of worms has been created by giving Congress the idea that any policy they want to institute can be accomplished by taxation. This is a dangerous path, and one that Congress will probably be only too gratified to use, judging by its past behavior.”

    I can see it now, either you buy a Chevy Volt or pay a tax.

    You drink diet soda, or pay a tax.

    Eat tofu, or pay a tax.

    In my opinion, the SCOTUS just gave my wallet to Washington.

    It’s Communism, plain and simple, and I’m ready for a “START OVER”.

    Take ALL of my money, and YOU decide what gets sent back to me, and it’s all done through wires, no paper needed, you will get a national ID card that will be used for “goods”.

    I would bet that if you asked why we went to War with England to secure our FREEDOM, the most common answer would be:

    to become free from the English Monarchy

    when I believe the correct answer would be:

    TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION.

    And now the SCOTUS has made it the law of the land AGAIN.

  57. Interested Bystander

    William,

    Commenting on CJ Roberts, William commented:

    “He also opened the door for future congresses to lie about policy and simply allow the court to call anything a tax without proper procedure….”

    Our Congress ALREADY lies about policy.

    Republican and Democrats, it doesn’t matter, it’s always:

    “Hey, look at the right hand while the left hand reaches for your money”

    It’s pitiful.

  58. I.B.,

    I know they already lie,

    But my point is now a new presedence has been set for congress to file any bill under the commerance clause or welfare clause and disguise it other than a tax. This is a first.

  59. Interested Bystander

    Hey All,

    If I may comment on Congress’ votes that held Holder in Contempt of Congress both Civily, and Criminally:

    I believe that Obama’s assertion of Executive privlege means that HE was briefed at some point BEFORE Feb of 2011 when the DoJ sent that letter to Grassley.

    When the DoJ ADMITTED some 10 months later that this letter was FALSE, it was ADMISSION of a cover up.

    And NOW, Holder has taken back his assertion that the former head of DoJ under Bush actually had been briefed about Wide Receiver.

    In other words Holder LIED, and has continue to LIE about when he knew about gun WALKING, not gun TRACKING as Wide Receiver did. PLUS Wide Receiver was conducted with the “support” of the Mexican Government, and Fast and Furious was done WITHOUT Mexico’s knowlege. PLUS, Wide Receiver was STOPPED in 2007 BECAUSE there were too many weapons that couldn’t be TRACKED any longer. PLUS Wide Receiver only “controlled”, it is my understanding, about 600 guns, and NOT the over 2000 ADMITTED too guns in this Fast and Furious catastrophe. PLUS, there is NO evidence that ANY weapons from Wide Receiver were used to kill a border patrol agent.

    But to listen to the Democrats “gun walking” started under Bush, and the contempt charges were “political”.

    Almost every Democrat that spoke during the one hour “debate” time, spoke about how we needed to get to the “beginning of gun walking”, and according to THEM, it started under Bush.

    The FACTS are that Fast and Furious started in 2009 AFTER Obama took office, and almost TWO YEARS AFTER Wide Receiver was stopped.

    I believe that this is another example of Congress trying to confuse the issues.

    But BOTH sides use these tactics.

    Our COUNTRY has lost it’s integrity, at least in my opinion. Why can’t our elected officials take off their PARTISAN hats and do what’s RIGHT for once? The vote yesterday on both charges should have been 435-0.

    Holder LIED, he has ADMITTED to that, and now he needs to be held in Contempt, which he was. Holder says they reviewed over 140,000 documents both before and after the Feb 2011 letter. ONLY a little over 7600 were handed over to the Committee. The majority of those documents are about Wide Receiver, and there are many “retractions”. The DoJ has REFUSED to hand over documents that were subpoenaed LEGALLY, and documents Holder has held over the Committee’s “head” as bait to get them to stop the investigation.

    The VOTE wasn’t “political”, the walking out of the Democrat members of Congress WAS “political”.

  60. Good Morning! Setting here waiting for the tax on people who are more than 10 lbs overweight, or drink beer, or smoke, or who are not members of Democratic party, or ……or…..

  61. Interested Bystander

    William commented:

    “But my point is now a new presedence has been set for congress to file any bill under the commerance clause or welfare clause and disguise it other than a tax. This is a first.”

    You are correct, it is a first.

    And it won’t be the last, even if Romney is elected, this ruling stands forever.

    One last thing before I go TRY to sleep:

    Whenever I hear the word “progressive”, I think COMMUNIST.

    We railed against these same things in the Cold War, and now they are “mainstream”.

  62. William | June 29, 2012 at 6:56 am |

    Good morning,

    Forgive my typing I’m on my cell.

    Has anybody noticed that conservative justices wrote their opinions as the “Majority”, and the liberal justices wrote their opinions as the dissenting???

    That means justice Roberts “switched” in the very last min….
    _____________________________

    This could be why Justice Kennedy was described as visibly angry. He didn’t see it coming and was shocked. Could he have been threatened?

  63. Sure looks like Roberts sold out to me. We’re talking about $Trillions hanging on the decision. Only someone foolish or ignorant would believe there was no external influence going into the decision. It won’t happen this year or probably even the next, but when the time comes, Roberts will sign an epic book deal. He will be handsomely rewarded.

    Washington is entirely corrupt and rotten to the core, and every politician (apparently including Supreme Court judges) has a price.

  64. SueQ,

    I don’t think Roberts was threatened, I think he switched at the last second because far too many rulings have been going aginst the liberals and was attempting for the court to appear non-bias. However, that is not their designed role to play politics.

    It is rare for the supreme court to play politics, but not the first. The new deal, federal reserve cases and of course the well known eligibility ruling from past chief justice to secure his own appointment.

    Having said that though, instead of exposing socialism and communism for what it is, he gave them an anchor and further fueled their cause.

  65. Roberts can now be labeled an activist judge, just like in liberal parallel world.
    William there is evidence that ROBERTS did CHANGE his mind after early vote. Anyway back to activist judge line. He CHANGED the law. IT is not say TAX it said FINE.

    If ROBERTS CHANGED IT and SENATE VOTED on it as a FINE. They then voted under FALSE pretenses. Would they vote the same today and get the 60 votes needed to pass a TAX??????

    I dont’ think so. Do you ?

  66. Rush Limbaugh On Obama Telling AZ To Drop Dead: I Am Scared What They Are Doing To This Country

    =======================

    “DEMOCRATS’ NEW MOTTO: NEVER LET A WILDFIRE GO TO WASTE”

    Michelle Malkin
    June 29, 2012

    “We must repeal Obamacare! Sign the petition!”

    “COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. — Did you know that President Obama has been incommunicado with Colorado’s governor for more than two weeks as the nation’s worst wildfires rage across the state? Maybe he thought we were all “doing fine.” After an embarrassing Beltway press briefing revelation about our out-of-touch White House, the administration finally decided to divert the campaigner in chief from his nationwide fundraising frenzy for a quick look-see at our devastated city on Friday. It’s “leadership from behind” you can count on.

    On Wednesday, press secretary Jay Carney acknowledged that Obama hadn’t talked to Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper in 15 days. Holy smokes. The High Park fire, which has consumed nearly 90,000 acres and claimed nearly 257 homes west of Fort Collins, ignited on June 9 and is still active. During a campaign swing just last week, first lady Michelle Obama made a brief mention of the High Park fire before launching into her standard GOP-bashing stump speeches.”

    The Article Continues Here:

    http://townhall.com/columnists/michellemalkin/2012/06/29/democrats_new_motto_never_let_a_wildfire_go_to_waste

  67. A TRULY MUST READ ARTICLE!! AN OUTSTANDING INFORMATIVE ARTICLE!!

    ~ PLEASE FORWARD THIS ARTICLE TO EVERYONE YOU CAN IN THE USA TO READ!! ~

    LEADERSHIP CRISIS

    “U.S. PRESIDENTS ABOVE THE LAW”

    “EXCLUSIVE: LARRY KLAYMAN DETAILS ‘REIGN OF TERRROR’ OF LAST 3 AMERICAN LEADERS”

    Published: 06/17/2012

    By Larry Klayman

    “Through our nation’s history, our youth were always taught in school that the U.S. legal system was the most honest in the world, and that “no one is above the law.” Indeed, even grownups were inclined to swallow this Kool-Aid. Perhaps it was our egocentric arrogance that resulted in this self-delusion – a delusion that has become more apparent with each passing year in the country’s 236-year-old history.

    Surely, at the dawn of the new republic and for many decades if not the greater part of a few centuries thereafter, the ethics, morality and, to put it simply, our sense of right and wrong were more strongly developed than they are today. The inherent spiral downward that followed has, however – I am sure we all can agree – reached cataclysmic proportions during the last 20 years, coinciding with the administrations of Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and now Barack Hussein Obama.

    During the Clinton years, Bill and Hillary, who I dubbed the Bonnie and Clyde of American politics, committed more than 40 major scandals, ranging from Chinagate to Filegate to Travelgate and Interngate. Indeed, Monica Lewinsky was the least of this criminal duo’s criminal misbehavior, as they sold out American high technology secrets to the communist Chinese in exchange for bribes, a clear act of treason. […].”

    “During the Bush years, W. ceded nearly total authority to his dictatorial Vice President Dick Cheney, whom he lovingly called “Vice.” […].”

    “Then there is the regime of Barack Hussein Obama. Having defrauded American voters that he is eligible to be president, given that he is not a “natural born citizen” as required by the Constitution, for “good measure” he spent the next four years not only foisting his evil socialist, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, pro-Muslim agenda on our nation and Israel, but also compromising the national security of both countries. His latest criminal atrocities include, but are not limited to, releasing into the public domain highly classified national security information […].”

    […]

    “[…] Either way, this charade and legal subterfuge are not only revolting, they are dangerous. For as John Adams, our great Founding Father and second American president, declared just days before signing the Declaration of Independence in Philadelphia: Without ethics, morality and religion there will be no lasting liberty.

    And, indeed, under the “reign of terror” of our last three criminally compromised presidents in particular, we have seen our liberties and freedoms dangerously eroded.

    It now comes to “We the People” to do what the legal establishment will not: criminally indict, try and convict our pResident. Let’s start with the biggest criminal and pResident in American history, Barack Hussein Obama, and empanel a citizen’s grand jury to not only hold him accountable under the rule of law, but to set an example for other presidents that we will no longer allow them to commit treason with impunity, much less violate the people’s trust.”

    Please Continue To Read The Entire Article Here:

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/u-s-presidents-above-the-law/

  68. William | June 29, 2012 at 9:24 am |
    SueQ,

    I don’t think Roberts was threatened, I think he switched at the last second
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Now, you are finally getting the real picture..how do any of you think the fraud stole the election?? threats…to our nation, NOT to their families.
    Couldn’t happen??? Neither could EOs out the ying yang, NDAA, F&F…….and now ofraudcare passed.

  69. think on this…if many like Levin, limbaugh, Beck, and on and on had done their jobs in 2007, we..would….not…be…discussing..this …ruling.
    Read my lips.
    Yes, I do believe they were all threatened.

  70. Pingback: “Get ready for Obamacare sticker shock” Orwellian lie from Charlotte Observer repeated by Greensboro News Record, Narrative for election, Shift blame to Republicans, Shock and lies began in 2009, Premiums deductibles policy losses job losses h

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s