Obama FL eligibility hearing June 18, 2012, Sheriff Joe Arpaio affidavit, Voeltz v Obama Florida ballot challenge, Judge Terry Lewis, Natural born citizen ruling

Obama FL eligibility hearing June 18, 2012, Sheriff Joe Arpaio affidavit, Voeltz v Obama Florida ballot challenge, Judge Terry Lewis, Natural born citizen ruling

“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense,  to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells

“I do not know where Barack Obama was born. I do know that he has used taxpayer dollars to keep his records hidden.”…Citizen Wells

“Why is Obama now employing private attorneys to keep his name on state ballots, despite compelling evidence that he is not a natural born citizen?…Citizen Wells

From Sam Sewell of the Steady Drip June 12, 2012.

“Attorney Larry Klayman has announced that Sheriff Joe Arpaio has authorized an affidavit by the Cold Case Posse to support allegations of Obama document fraud cited in the Voeltz v Obama FL ballot challenge case. This should undercut previous defense arguments that previous witnesses were not credible, although their qualifications and experience should be more than sufficient to establish that Obama’s alleged proof of eligibility is fraudulent.

Consider that the Arpaio Posse and other evidence is of no use to us unless used in legal or legislative proceedings, so here we go!

A hearing is scheduled at 0900 on Monday, June 18 at Leon County Courthouse.

http://ConstitutionActionFund.org

is trying to raise money to cover the attorney fees and other expenses to keep this case going.

Special thanks to the Surprise AZ, Tea Party, for requesting and supporting the Posse, Sheriff Joe for making it happen and Chief Investigator Mike Zullo and his team, along with informants, for producing investigation RESULTS!”

Read more:

http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2012/06/flash-june-18-fl-ballot-challenge.html

From WND June 13, 2012.

“WATCH FLORIDA ELIGIBILITY HEARING LIVE
WND-TV to provide free live-stream from courtroom of Bush v. Gore judge”

“WND-TV will provide gavel-to-gavel, live video coverage of the latest challenge to Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility in a courtroom hearing that could deny him ballot access to this all-important electoral swing state in November.

Judge Terry Lewis, best known for presiding over the 2000 Bush v. Gore election dispute, will consider arguments from attorney Larry Klayman and attorneys for the Obama campaign. The hearing will focus on Obama’s claim to be a “natural born citizen,”” as required under Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.

Lewis is credited with making crucial rulings in the contested 2000 presidential election, when ultimately a Florida vote recount was halted by the U.S. Supreme Court and George W. Bush was declared the winner.

Sign up now to get access to WND-TV’s special free, live-stream page prior to the hearing.

WND-TV has been designated by the court as the official pool TV service providing all other TV stations and networks with feeds.

Klayman’s law firm filed the challenge to Obama’s name on the ballot on behalf of Michael Voeltz, “a registered member of the Democrat Party, voter, and taxpayer in Broward County, who was an eligible elector for the Florida Primary of Jan. 31, 2012.”

Klayman’s work is being supported by the Constitution Action Fund, a non-profit raising money for the legal challenge.

Klayman told WND that during a hearing last month on discovery issues in the case, Lewis noted that the plaintiff’s brief cited U.S. Supreme Court case Minor v. Happersett from 1875 defining “natural born citizen” as the offspring of two citizens of the nation, while the Obama campaign’s arguments provided no citations.

The definition of the term is critical. Such a step has not been reached in any of the more than 100 legal cases that have been brought over Obama’s eligibility since before his election in 2008.

The U.S. Constitution imposes a special citizenship status requirement on occupants of the Oval Office. The “natural born citizen” requirement is not imposed on other federal officials. From the writings of the Founders, its apparent aim was to ensure that no person who had divided loyalties – to the United States and any other nation – would serve as commander in chief.

Klayman has argued that since Obama, by his own admission, was not born to two citizen parents, he is not a “natural born citizen” and, therefore, is ineligible to be a candidate on the state’s election ballot.

Florida’s election statutes provide broad protections for voters to ensure that the integrity of the election system is beyond reproach. One of the laws allows voters to challenge the nomination of a candidate who is not eligible for the office he is seeking.

“Obama’s briefs [said] it would be an undue burden and expense to have discovery,” Klayman said.

The judge said he wanted Obama’s representatives to cite the “authority” on which they based their argument that it isn’t necessary to have two citizen parents to be a natural-born citizen.”

“The case explains that even if Barack Hussein Obama was born within the United States, he is still not a “natural-born citizen” as required by the U.S. Constitution. That’s because, “Barack Obama Sr. was born in the British Colony of Kenya on June 18, 1936. Birth in Kenya made Barack Obama Sr. a British subject, according to and governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948.”

A case filing explains: “No physical, paper copy of defendant Obama’s birth certificate has been presented to establish his eligibility. … Defendant Obama has electronically produced a copy of what he purports to be his ‘birth certificate.’ Nevertheless, there is evidence to suggest that the electronically produced birth certificate is entirely fraudulent or otherwise altered.”

The argument also cites Barack Obama Sr.’s birth in Kenya, making him a “British subject.””

http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/watch-florida-eligibility-hearing-live/

25 responses to “Obama FL eligibility hearing June 18, 2012, Sheriff Joe Arpaio affidavit, Voeltz v Obama Florida ballot challenge, Judge Terry Lewis, Natural born citizen ruling

  1. MINOR v. HAPPERSETT REVISITED.

    …the only time the US Supreme Court ever did define the class of persons who were POTUS eligible under Article 2 Section 1 was in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), wherein it was held:

    “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 168.

    http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

  2. BUYER BEWARE BIRTHER BALONEY (1 of 2)
    June 9, 2012

    © 2012 jbjd

    As if providing the facts that would drive the discourse of the 2012 election cycle away from fatuous fiction with respect to President Obama’s origins wasn’t sufficiently challenging; now, when he is turning the corner to what could have been a virtually guaranteed rejection of his bid for re-election, Constitutional huckster Sheriff Joe Arpaio -’I never met a due process right I couldn’t deny’ – beguiled a duplicitous AZ SoS Ken Bennett into helping steer Mr. Obama over the finish line, aided and abetted in his siren song by his WND handlers, including Dr. Jerome Corsi; and a supporting cast of crazies.BUYER BEWARE BIRTHER BALONEY (1 of 2)

    http://jbjd.wordpress.com/

  3. bob strauss | June 14, 2012 at 10:43 am | BUYER BEWARE BIRTHER BALONEY (1 of 2)
    June 9, 2012

    © 2012 jbjd
    ________________________________________
    Ahhhh, hindsight is always 20/20!

    As usual a lot of wordsmithing but also as usual what everyone has already digested and reasoned WITHOUT the self anointing additional stamp by jbjd!!

  4. Sen. Orrin Hatch believes that Attorney General Holder should resign, but that “he’s basically a nice man.”

    Grrrr………That is indicative of the “spine” of so many of our leaders. How can you call someone “nice” who is at best an outrageously irresponsible public servant and at worst an outright criminal? That’s a sample of what “politics” does to people, especially when they’ve been in office too long.

    http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/holder-hatch-resignation/2012/06/13/id/442257?s=al&promo_code=F2DB-1

  5. observer | June 14, 2012 at 11:17 am |
    As usual a lot of wordsmithing but also as usual what everyone has already digested and reasoned WITHOUT the self anointing additional stamp by jbjd!!
    *********************
    Agreed! I could see nothing beneficial to the cause.

  6. Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse Commander Responds to The CNN Hit Piece On Donald Trump

  7. coldwarvet2

    Sometimes I feel that we are only seeing the hood ornament on the semi- truck coming at us out of the fog.

  8. http://ca.news.yahoo.com/venezuela-says-building-drones-irans-help-160436916.html

    For some time I’ve been thinking about the risk of other countries sending drones over to the U.S. After all, we are using them in places like Afghanistan, etc. What is to keep Iran, Venezuela, or China from using them against us?

  9. CabbyAZ……………
    When the foreign countries receive the TOP SECRET flight guidance technology from the US they probably will start overflights of the US. It is probable that ALL foreign countries will be GIVEN the TOP SECRET technology very soon by Soetoro and his cutthroat Chicago criminal friends.

  10. ………and that would be in keeping with the same SHARING OF SECRET TECHNOLOGY which SLICK WILLY saw fit to GIVE to the Chinese early into his term in office. Real nice guy………GIVING AWAY CLASSIFIED INFORMATION to a potential enemy. Slick Willy did it, and Soetoro IS DOING IT AS WELL. Perhaps the resultant enemy attack will be a special delivery device right down the WH CHIMNEY.

  11. The American people think that giving the enemy all of our secret technology is COOOOL. Wait until they receive the really hot result. Too late then to UNDO the DUMB A$$ mindset of the American people.

  12. BYE BYE ………time for a NAP.

  13. coldwarvet2

    Oldsalt79
    Perhaps the resultant enemy attack will be a special delivery device right down the WH CHIMNEY.
    Gee…that would put us back to square one in politics.
    Would that be a bad thing?……lol

  14. coldwarvet2

    Hi Cabby..
    re: foreign drones…
    The US has in place, and has had for decades, a radar shield at it’s borders called the ADIZ (air defense identification zone). Any aircraft penetrating this zone would need to identify itself via a transponder signal known as IFF (identification friend or foe). It would not be a good idea to cross any of these zones without a transponder signal, especially in this day and age. This is a pretty standard system world wide.
    It is what allows your airliner to fly to Mexico, or trans Atlantic, or trans Pacific for that matter. Feel any safer?…

  15. ~~~The judge said he wanted Obama’s representatives to cite the “authority” on which they based their argument that it isn’t necessary to have two citizen parents to be a natural-born citizen.”~~~

    Isn’t that covered in the administration’s changing/deleting/rewording anything that is obtrusive to our maintaining of our liberties??(insert sarcasm icon here)

  16. coldwarvet2

    …forgot…stealth argument…
    We developed stealth…also developed digital and thermographic detection systems now in place…that’s so, in case Iran or Russia want to return any of our drones, by flying them back to us, we won’t shoot them down…now do you feel any safer?…

  17. Any aircraft penetrating this zone would need to identify itself via a transponder signal known as IFF (identification friend or foe).

    Ahhh, yes, like the one that DIDN’T stop incoming at the Pentagon on 9/11?? THAT radar shield??
    I’m still waiting for ‘the’ explanation why a multi-billion dollar defense system wasn’t engaged that day.(sarc)

  18. coldwarvet2

    jayjay
    Those aircraft, if I’m not mistaken, were already inside the ADIZ (domestic flights) and, as such, were not suspect aircraft and were consequently not challenged by IFF systems. I believe things may have changed somewhat since then also. But I just comment facts, and besides, my comment was a bit tongue in cheek anyway. I realize that we cannot best all threats.

  19. coldwarvet2 | June 14, 2012 at 4:46 pm |
    Hi Cabby..
    re: foreign drones…
    Feel any safer?…
    *************************
    Warvet, thanks so much for that information, which I did not know.
    Feel safer? Well, yes, in a sense; but it depends largely who is in command…. You know, like the CIC. Like most here, under present conditions I’ve lost my trust.

  20. We have drones INSIDE the USA too. Are you feeling comfy yet?

  21. coldwarvet2 | June 14, 2012 at 6:09 pm |
    AHHHH..’tongue in cheek’ comments noted!!

  22. The only way the US will be any safer is when the fraud obama is removed from office until then every American’s freedom is at risk . And his removal needs to be done under US Constitutional Law and not by a presidential election . We The People can not have a legal presidential election in 2012 while the current obama administration is a illegal one .

  23. A Commie Kenyan came to town
    And shamed our nation up and down
    Bush then Clinton, Bush then Barry–
    A road to hell that’s pretty scary.
    And Romney–what will Romney do
    Before this mad, sad streak is through?
    This nation’s mired in evil works.
    For leaders we have frauds and jerks!

  24. Bob you are incorrect, there is also Perkins vs. Elg,1939 in which the Supreme Court stated that Ms. Elg was a natural born citizen because she was born in N.Y. of parents who were also u.s. citizens at the time of her birth.

  25. We have an imposter in the White House, and he is running OUR country like an imposter. He should be tried and imprisioned for his atrocities!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s