Philip Berg update, May 17, 2009, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Michelle Obama, Hoax, Constitutional crisis, Obama ineligible, illegal alien, Michelle Obama disbarred

From Philip J Berg, may 17, 2009:

“For Immediate Release: – 05/17/2009
For Further Information Contact:
Philip J. Berg, Esquire
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Cell (610) 662-3005
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
philjberg@obamacrimes.com
Berg states the Obama’s give Commencement Addresses but
fail to be honest with the graduates about who they really are.
Barack Obama is really Barry Soetoro, an illegal alien, an
Usurper who is Constitutionally “ineligible” to be President
of the United States.
Michelle Obama is a “disbarred” attorney in Illinois – how
and why ?
Why does the public not know the backgrounds of the
phonies in the White House ?
Obama is the biggest “HOAX” against the United States in
over 230 years !
Time to e-mail !
(Lafayette Hill, PA – 05/17/2009) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first
Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator
Obama’s lack of Constitutional “qualifications/eligibility” to serve as
President of the United States and has three [3] cases that are still pending
in the Federal Court system, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and
Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al, announced today that he is asking
everyone to e-mail the messages below to DEMAND THE OBAMA’S to
release the “truth” about their backgrounds.
The purpose of our President is to protect our Country, the U.S.A.
and “We The People”, not to leave us with doubts and fears. If “We The
People” and our Country, the United States of America, are important to
Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack H. Obama, he would do everything in his
power to put all doubts and fears to rest. It is a very easy solution; all he
has to do is provide his Constitutional eligibility credentials and records.
Yes, transparency and openness as promised by Obama !
Our country is in a financial crisis, BUT WORSE, a “Constitutional
Crisis” as Obama is not “Constitutionally eligible/qualified” to be
President.
Send one [1] e-mail to the following: The White House, Vice
President Biden – http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/; Nancy Pelosi –
AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov; ASSOCIATED PRESS – traum@ap.org; New York
Times – letters@nytimes.com, oped@nytimes.com, editorial@nytimes.com, nytnews@nytimes.com,
executive-editor@nytimes.com, managing-editor@nytimes.com, news-tips@nytimes.com,
national@nytimes.com, washington@nytimes.com; Washington Post – letters@washpost.com,
national@washpost.com, sundaysource@washpost.com; Washington Times –
oped@washingtontimes.com, yourletters@washingtontimes.com; Los Angeles Times –
Tim.Garrison@latimes.com, Michael.Owen@latimes.com, Tenny.Tatusian@latimes.com,
David.Johnson@latimes.com, Marc.Olson@latimes.com, Michael.Muskal@latimes.com,
Roger.Smith@latimes.com, Ashley.Dunn@latimes.com, Steve.Padilla@latimes.com,
Mark.Barabak@latimes.com, Connie.Stewart@latimes.com, Robin.Abcarian@latimes.com,
Bob.Drogin@latimes.com; The Chicago Tribune – tips@tribune.com, bdold@tribune.com,
ctc-editor@tribune.com, JHirt@tribune.com, JWinnecke@tribune.com, KAlleynemorris@tribune.com,
Rxbecker@tribune.com, SBenzkofer@tribune.com; The Sacramento Bee – oped@sacbee.com,
letters@sacbee.com: ATLANTA JOURNAL – CONSTIUTION – bsteiden@ajc.com,
cwarmbold@ajc.com, cynthia@ajc.com, gmathis@ajc.com, hklibanoff@ajc.com, hpost@ajc.com,
jmallory@ajc.com, jbookman@ajc.com, jdwallace@ajc.com, letters@ajc.com, insideajc@ajc.com,
pgast@ajc.com, rnarayanan@ajc.com, rhenry@ajc.com; BOSTON GLOBE –
goodman@globe.com, kcooper@globe.com, johnson@globe.com, letter@globe.com,
brelis@globe.com, oliphant@globe.com; BUSINESS WEEK – lettersbwol@businessweek.com,
richard_dunham@businessweek.com; ABC – netaudr@abc.com, nightline@abcnews.com,
2020@abc.com; CBS – evening@cbsnews.com, earlyshow@cbs.com, 60minutes@cbsnews.com,
48hours@cbsnews.com, ftn@cbsnews.com; NBC – today@nbc.com; FOX News –
comments@foxnews.com, Special@foxnews.com, Foxreport@foxnews.com, Oreilly@foxnews.com,
Hannity@foxnews.com, Colmes@foxnews.com, Ontherecord@foxnews.com; CNN and CNN
Headline News – http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form1.html?6,
http://www.cnn.com/feedback/; aaron.brown@turner.com, andrea.koppel@turner.com,
bill.schneider@turner.com, bruce.morton@turner.com, candy.crowley@turner.com; MSNBC,
dateline@nbc.com, hardball@msnbc.com, joe@msnbc.com, nightly@nbc.com; CNBC –
info@cnbc.com; PBS – newshour@pbs.org; NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO –
ombudsman@npr.org; THE RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOW – ElRushbo@eibnet.com;
SEAN HANNITY SHOW – phil.boyce@citcomm.com;
“To Barack Hussein Obama a/k/a Barry Soetoro and Michelle
Obama: As your administration is to be “open and transparent,” why will
you not divulge your backgrounds? I know why.
As both of you are addressing graduates of college, you are being
dishonest to all of them as you fail to tell them about your backgrounds.
What a disgrace !
Because both of you are putting on the biggest “HOAX” in our
country in over 230 years.
Barack or rather Barry [Soetoro], you know you are an illegal alien,
not only “Constitutionally ineligible/unqualified” to be President, but also
it was illegal for you to have served as a United States Senator from
Illinois for 3 ½ years.
Michelle, just be honest ! You are being honored as First Lady
without explaining to the citizens of our country that you were “disbarred”
from being an attorney in 1993 – why ? The public has a right to know.
Michelle and Obama, you both know that you are putting forth this
great “HOAX,” that is so dangerous to all of us, the people of this great
nation.
Reveal yourselves and Obama resign, as President “now” as
everything you do is void or voidable. Why are you putting our nation
through this turmoil ?
Thank you,
Respectfully,
__________________________ [your name]”
For copies of all Press Releases and Court Pleadings, go to:
obamacrimes.com”

 

Read more:

 

http://www.obamacrimes.info/index.html

34 responses to “Philip Berg update, May 17, 2009, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Michelle Obama, Hoax, Constitutional crisis, Obama ineligible, illegal alien, Michelle Obama disbarred

  1. Patriot Dreamer

    So, is Berg actively pursuing his cases again? His web page has been inactive for so long.

    Citizen Wells, can you share your e-mail address? I have some news stories I’d like to share with you. Thanks!

  2. INDEED! When will this nightmare end?!?!

  3. Excellent Topic, Citizen Wells.

    The Obamas have been carrying on their UNConstitutional HOAX since the FEC and
    DNC failed the American People in not vetting
    these people. Neither of them would pass
    to get a National Security Clearance. Neither
    Barack Hussein NOR Michelle Robinson holds
    a law license to date and we know that Ms. Robinson had hers taken away by court order though the records on this are “sealed”. Both have radical ties to terrorists, Muslim “money bags,” and individuals who are now incarcerated for fraud and money laundering. Barack Hussein as a “Consitutional law professor” is the biggest joke of all—either he has NEVER READ the Constitution or he has chosen to SPIT on it by continuing to perpitrate this infiltration of
    usurpership like a common spy. He should
    be tried as a traitor for high crimes and misdemeanors against the U.S., Treason, and Fraud.
    GITMO has an open vacancy for him.

    Let the Grand Juries continue across this
    great Nation. This is OUR “urgency” of NOW!

  4. Citizen Wells,
    If you have been following the ongoing scandal around fraudulent expenses claims made by Members of Parliameant in the UK you will understand why it might be a great isea to get in touch with The Daily Telegraph which risked a great deal to break that story and are risking more by honourably refusing to identify their source..

    In fact if Phil Berg and Orly Taitz were to make a joint approach to the Telegraph they might embarrass the US political establishment enough to force some action. There is just cause to take this outside the US, the actions of the POTUS affect the entire world.

  5. MICHELLE OBAMA WAS NOT DISBARRED.

    I recently corrected similarly erroneous comments on another blog (name omitted); this time, I will reproduce a comment left by another lawyer who identifies as “GeorgetownJD,” on “yestodemocracy,” from January, essentially stating what I restated months later, before I found his earlier defense. http://www.yestodemocracy.com/yes_to_democracy_no_to_pu/2008/11/bergs-whistleblowing-lawsuit—illegal-alien-claim-made-against-obama.html

    Here are GeorgetownJD’s comments, repeated in full.

    Ah, cpabooks, it’s a good thing you are a bean counter because your deductive reasoning and research skills are wanting. You’ve already concluded that Michelle was “forced by the courts to withdraw her license after only four years of parctice [sic – practice]“, so I don’t know how much explaining I can do to shake yiou of this. But here goes.

    In Illinois, the REGISTRATION OF and disciplinary proceedings affecting members of the Illinois bar has been delegated by the Illinois Supreme Court to a board called the Attorney REGISTRATION and Disciplinary Commission. The ARDC collects bar dues, administers an orientation program for newly-admitted members, and oversees the mandatory continuing legal education program.

    Pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule 756, annual bar dues and registration is required. An attorney may voluntarily transfer to involuntary status if he or she does not engaged in practice before the Illinois courts. Most often this statuts is sought when attorney moves to another state but wants to maintain Illinois bar membership; when an attorney retires; when he/she takes an in-house position and thus does not hold himself/herself out for legal representation of members of the public (when you are in house, you have only one client); or when the attorney takes a position in a non-legal field, but wants to retain the ability to return to the active practice of law.

    The advantage of transferring to inactive status is that bar dues are only $90 annually (whereas for active members they are $239) (see Rule 756(a)(5); the inactive attorney is exempt from the minimum CLE (see Rule 791(a)(1); and he/she does not have to maintain a policy for professional errors and omissions (that’s malpractice insurance for you gringoes).

    So what’s all this fuss about “court ordered” inactive status, you ask? Well, a visit to the ARDC’s website would answer that. See ://www.iardc.org/rule770inactivestatus.html . To summarize it for you, cpabooks, “Court ordered” refers to former Illinois Supreme Court 770, which applied to registration status PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1, 1999. Under that former Rule, an attorney who wished to VOLUNTARILY transfer to inactive status had to petition the Court for an order allowing such. It was simply administrative — no hearing was required, just paperwork.

    Michelle Obama left Sidley in 1993 to take a position in the nonprfit sector in 1993. Notice that the ARDC site shows she went to inactive status in 1993. In 1993, when former Rule 770 was the operative provision for ransfer to voluntary inactive status, MO was required to petition for a court order. As should be obvious, the order was granted.

    In short, there is nothing nefarious about MO’s law license going inactive.

    Stick to preparing tax returns.

    Posted by: GeorgetownJD | January 07, 2009 at 02:51 PM

    As to a definitive explanation on the change of rules… Here is a quote directly from the IL bar site:

    “Prior to November 1, 1999, former Supreme Court Rule 770 provided for a proceeding in the Court for any voluntary transfer to inactive status, whether because of some incapacitating condition or solely as a matter of the lawyer’s preference because the lawyer would not be practicing law.”
    http://www.iardc.org/rule770inactivestatus.html

    Here is a comment from another poster on that other blog.

    Comment by elliewyatt | 2009-05-02 23:29:49

    One can also go to ARDC site and look at all disciplinary actions against all Illinois attorneys by year. I poured through all several hundred for that year, plus half a year on either side to be sure.

    There is NO disciplinary action against her.

    It is not good to perpetuate this bogus story. It is not good for (name of blog omitted by jbjd).

  6. Ian…I agree! We need to be contacting members of the press on an international level…..
    Once they start reporting the obvious, maybe our shameful excuse for a media will be forced to cover this.

    I plan to research and send as many emails as I can.

    Here is a site that contains good legal information about the NBC issue:

    http://stopsocialism.wordpress.com/2009/05/10/barry-soetoro-aka-barack-obama-facts/

  7. Why I Voted Democrat….
    Bear who blogs at The Absurd Report compiled the following satirical list of reasons for voting Democrat:

    I voted Democrat because I love the fact that I can now marry whatever I want. I’ve decided to marry my horse.
    I voted Democrat because I believe oil companies’ profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn’t.
    I voted Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending the money I earn than I would.
    I voted Democrat because freedom of speech is fine as long as nobody is offended by it.
    I voted Democrat because when we pull out of Iraq I trust that the bad guys will stop what they’re doing because they now think we’re good people.
    I voted Democrat because I’m way too irresponsible to own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to protect me from murderers and thieves.
    I voted Democrat because I believe that people who can’t tell us if it will rain on Friday can tell us that the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I don’t start driving a Prius.
    I voted Democrat because I’m not concerned about the slaughter of millions of babies so long as we keep all death row inmates alive.
    I voted Democrat because I believe that business should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to the government for redistribution as THEY see fit.
    I voted Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.
    I voted Democrat because my head is so firmly planted up my ass that it is unlikely that I’ll ever have another point of view.

  8. Sandy, That was great.
    But a real lefty believes that even the cops shouldn’t have guns.

  9. Maddie, It should be a law that when you are running for President you need to pass a national security clearance.

  10. Jacqlyn Smith

    I sent my e-mails out…..many of the addresses he gave are not correct though….I sent them anyway and just deleted those that came back as failed!!

  11. Jacqlyn Smith

    From Mario Apuzzo—–

    Monday, May 18, 2009
    Declaration Opposing Defendants’ Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Move as to the Amended Complaint Returnable June 1, 2009
    Activity in Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al Lawsuit – On 18 May 2000 I filed a Declaration Opposing Defendants’ Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Move as to the Amended Complaint Returnable June 1, 2009. The defendants have already had almost three months to answer, move, or otherwise respond. Regular citizen defendants get 20 days. The government normally gets 60 days. They have already had almost 90 days. What they are asking for would get them to over 120 days before having to answer or otherwise move. In our opinion, they have had an adequate amount of time to answer or move or other wise respond. Thus I have filed our opposition to any further extensions of time to answer or otherwise move on this case. More on that in a subsequent post.

    Link to a copy of the Declaration Opposing Defendants’ Motion:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/15610545/

    Link to view Advertorial on page 11 in 18 May 2009 edition of Washington Times National Weekly:

    Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
    185 Gatzmer Avenue
    Jamesburg NJ 08831
    Email: apuzzo [AT] erols.com
    TEL: 732-521-1900 ~ FAX: 732-521-3906
    BLOG: http://puzo1.blogspot.com

  12. Patriot Dreamer

    Stephanie, you’re right. Just look at the 20th anniversary revision of “E.T.” where Steven Spielberg had the guns replaced with walkie-talkies! Weird!

  13. CW

    Reading recently about the CIA and Pelosi. The CIA seems like the agency to save the US from Soetoro. Why won’t they leak the information? Surely they know!

    A leak to a foreign news agency, rather than our own, surely would make an impact.

  14. citizenwells

    jbjd.
    Barack did indeed “voluntarily” relinquish or allow his law license to go inactive.
    However, I have it on authority, that this is a regular practice in IL to avoid prosecution
    or other legal proceedings. Obama, having lied on his bar application, could have been
    and should have been disbarred or otherwise prosecuted.
    I am not saying yea or nay regarding Michelle’s law license.
    Are we certain that she was not “forced” to relinquish her license?

  15. citizenwells

    I have been wondering about the CIA for many months.
    I would like to be a fly on the wall in that inner sanctum.

  16. CW

    I had my doubts about Leon being from the Clinton era, but appears he has his head screwed on correctly.

    Someone better do something pretty darned quick, IMO!!

  17. Patriot Dreamer

    CW,

    BHO’s attorney status with the Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) is “Voluntarily retired and not authorized to practice law – Last Registered Year: 2008”. I would imagine that he retired (as you said) so that he would not have to worry about legal ethics complaints, etc. that could potentially result in disbarment. Such as what happened to former President Clinton who was disbarred. Look at what is happening to current Bush administration lawyers :

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/19/us/19detain.html

    As for Michelle, her ARDC record says “Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law – Last Registered Year: 1993” but then it says “No malpractice report required as attorney is on COURT ORDERED INACTIVE STATUS.” (emphasis added).

    I read elsewhere that her court ordered inactive status is due to her involvement in an insurance fraud case, but I don’t know how reliable that is.

    Link to Illinois ARDC

    https://www.iardc.org/ardcroll.asp

  18. JBJD, why don’t you precede over to your favorite Obot’s Blog and let us have a civil discussion without your vitroil being spewed, to try and change the subject?

  19. citizenwells

    Patriot Dreamer
    Thanks for jogging my memory.

  20. citizenwells

    Ian.
    The foreign presses have done a far better job of covering Obama, et al.
    Thanks.
    Perhaps the Telegraph would consider a trial scenario presenting the prosecution’s
    case against Obama. Present the idea to them. I will participate.

  21. I will post more on this later.

    Philip Berg will be a guest on USApatriots-shout blogtalkradio program this Sunday at 6 pm Pacific Standard Time. I hope many of you will join in the chat room and/or call and ask questions. I have the highest respect for Mr. Berg.

  22. Stephanie, there is absolutely no justification for enacting any law mandating the candidate for POTUS to undergo any screening whatsoever. The Constitution sets the eligibility requirements for POTUS. We voters can make known that we will not endorse any candidate who, for example, refuses to prove he is Constitutionally eligible for the job. But, over 50 million Americans ‘said’ they did not care, by voting for BO notwithstanding nothing in the record tends to prove he is a NBC. This is their right; this is the Constitution. (Nothing in the Constitution required members of the Electoral College to vet the candidate, either; and despite our best efforts to inform them of BO’s eligibility problems, they nonetheless cast their votes in ignorance as to his eligibility status, too. This was their right. Again, Congress Certified the EC vote without vetting the President-elect; I anticipate that millions of voters will nevertheless cast their votes for these legislators in the next election. That is their right.) But what we can do is to enact strict laws as to who is eligible to get his or her name onto our state ballots. And we can continue to educate those around us as to both how our government is supposed to work; and the facts of this last election cycle.

  23. Patriot Dreamer

    I think jbjd is just trying to protect this site from a defamation law suit (libel). Berg says that Michelle’s record with the Illinois ARDC is “sealed”. If that is true, then someone looking on the ARDC website might not be able to find any disciplinary actions on her. However, if GeorgetownJD is correct and that is simply what an attorney’s online record says when going from active to inactive status, then Berg is taking a risk of getting sued for defamation. That said, Michelle is a public figure now, so the lawsuit would have to show actual malice on Berg’s part — not simply that he was incorrect.

  24. CW, the mechanism used to voluntarily cease to practice law differs depending on the year. The other blog I referenced in my comment had published a comment from a guest writer that contained a reference to the ‘fact’ MO was disbarred. I and several other readers objected to this characterization, providing proof of our assertion, some of which I posted above. The owners of the blog researched the issue, and ended up pulling the allegations.

    Unless you can post more definitive evidence of your conclusions, I wish you would do the same.

    Patriot Dreamer, thank you for your insight. (Actually, it’s not so much trying to avoid the risk of suit that motivates me as trying to maintain the blog’s credibility. CW works very hard on this; and many people come here for information they may not be able to obtain on other sites.)

  25. citizenwells

    jbjd
    I reported the information from Philip Berg’s site.
    I never said that I agreed with it.

  26. citizenwells

    I wish that either of the Obama’s would oppose me in court.
    That is my dream.
    To put them on the witness stand.

  27. Patriot Dreamer

    Good point re: credibility, jbjd.

  28. jbjd—-

    My research revealed what Patriot Dreamer
    stated here. Curious question for you?
    Why did Michelle “seal” the records dealing
    with her law license “change?”

    While you are answering that one, WHY
    is Barack Obama/Soetoro “sealing ALL his
    records and fighting hard to keep them that
    way, even if it costs over $1 Million Bucks??!!
    I await your reply, sure to be interesting.

  29. Rocknee // May 19, 2009 at 11:54 am

    CW

    Reading recently about the CIA and Pelosi. The CIA seems like the agency to save the US from Soetoro. Why won’t they leak the information? Surely they know!

    A leak to a foreign news agency, rather than our own, surely would make an impact.
    =============
    great idea

  30. Sandy & Ian—
    sandy // May 19, 2009 at 9:45 am

    Ian…I agree! We need to be contacting members of the press on an international level…..
    Once they start reporting the obvious, maybe our shameful excuse for a media will be forced to cover this.

    I plan to research and send as many emails as I can.

    Here is a site that contains good legal information about the NBC issue:

    http://stopsocialism.wordpress.com/2009/05/10/barry-soetoro-aka-barack-obama-facts/
    =============
    Yes, an interesting way to go.

  31. Ian—I have a “moat” that needs cleaning—
    do the Brits have any extra money for me?

    Would that come under ” community service”?

  32. Fernley Girl

    Rocknee // May 19, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    CW

    I had my doubts about Leon being from the Clinton era, but appears he has his head screwed on correctly.

    Someone better do something pretty darned quick, IMO!!
    *****************************************

    Or, Obama wants Pelosi out of the way, and Panetta is working toward that goal.

  33. IF THE OBAMA’S DONT SHOW ALL THEIR RECORDS NOW, BEFORE HE DESTROYS OUR CONSTITUTION AND ALL OF OUR RIGHTS, WE ARE DEAD IN THE WATER. IT’S A MATTER OF DEMANDING TO SEE THE RECORDS NOW –AND I DO MEAN LIKE YESTERDAY. THIS MENTALLY ILL PERSON HAS PULLED THE BIGGEST CON IN HISTORY AND IT’S TIME FOR HIM TO GO. HE LAUGHS HIS HEAD OFF EVERY TIME HE TALKS TO HIS CRONIES –AND TELLS THEM HOW SHARP HE IS AND HOW STUPID THE WHITEY’S ARE. (QUOTE FROM MICHELLE’S TAPE). WHOEVER IS HOLDING IT. BE THE HERO WHO SAVED AMERICA FROM THE MAN WHO IS HELL BENT ON WANTING TO DESTROY DESTROY OUR COUNTRY. AND THIS SCUMBUCKET WONT TELL YOU HIS NAME. BUT HE WANT’S TO KNOW ALL OF YOUR BUSINESS AND TELL YOU WHAT YOU CAN AND CANNOT DO. HE IS NOT ABOVE THE LAW. HE IS JUST ONE INSIGNIFICANT PATHOLOGICAL LIAR BORN AS ARAB AFRICAN IN KENYA. AS IS STATED ON HIS FATHER ‘S CERTIFICATE IN KENYA .REMEMBER HE IS NOT ALONE IN THIS BIG CON. CHECK OUT ALL RECORS ON ALL POLITICANS AND BIG CORPORATIONS, BANKS AND THE FEDERAL RESERVES. SO AMERICA IF WE DON’T TAKE OBAMA OUT NOW. HE WILL TAKE US OUT. THAT’S HIS AGENDA. AND HE DOESN,T CARE HOW HE DOES IT. SO WE HAVE TO TAKE HIM OUT OF OUR WHITE FIRST. SO PLEASE GOD , BLESS OUR COUNTRY. AND TAKE OUT THE TRASH ANYWAY YOU WANT. JUST SO WE DON’T HAVE TO SMELL THE SCUMBUCKETS WHO DO NOT KNOW A DAM THING ABOUT CARRING FOR OUR COUNTRY. BUT ONLY TO DESTROY. OUR POWERS THAT BE ARE ON ONE TEAM. THEY ARE JUST KNOWN BY DIFFERENT NAMES. JACKASSES AND ELEPHANT’S. PEOPLE OF AMERICA PLEASE PUT GOD BACK INTO YOUR LIFE. HE IS OUR ARMOUR

  34. WHAT IS THE REAL PATRIOTIC WORTH OF THE BIRTHERS?
    Resident Barry Soetoro may well serve unscathed, but there shall be so much hell raised over this constitutional citizenship issue that no political party will ever make such an asinine mistake again.

    Consequently, history will judge the Birthers and Donald Trump as heroes of our American Republic.

    Currently, eight states are working on laws to require natural-born proof of citizenship, before any presidential candidate can be placed on state ballots.

    This state action may bode real grief for Soetoro in 2012.

    If Resident Soetoro comes out fighting for a legal ‘free pass’ on those new state laws, then you can bet there is a skunk in the woodpile.

    SURF Is Up and SUSPICION is HIGH!

    Read More:
    http://www.stumping-for-ole-glory.com/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s