National Grand Jury, Stephen Pidgeon, Declaration, US Constitution, Judicial system, First Amendment, Ninth Amendment, Tenth Amendment, Review Federal Government Agencies, Comply with Declaration of Independence, Constitution for USA

From the Right Side of Life:

“Attorney Issues a National Grand Jury Declaration”

“As reported late last night via, Stephen Pidgeon, attorney for Broe v. Reed, has officially announced that he has issued a declaration (audio at link) for a national grand jury:

Pursuant to First Amendment (The right of the people peaceably to assemble), the Ninth Amendment (The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people), and the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America (The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people), this National Grand Jury is convened by natural born citizens of the fifty several states and of the United States of America, seating 50 jurors pursuant to the duties, powers, responsibilities, qualifications as established hereunder for the following purposes:

  • To examine all aspects of the federal government by initiating its own investigations.
  • To serve as ombudsmen for the citizens of the country in respect to constitutional rights. and privileges established under the organic documents of the United States of America, as properly amended from time to time.
  • To conduct criminal investigations of members of the federal government, and, if the evidence is sufficient, issue criminal indictments.

The National Grand Jury Process

The National Grand Jury, although a part of the judicial system, is an entirely independent body. Judges of the Supreme Court, the Courts of Appeal, and the District Courts of the United States, United States Attorneys, and Congress of the United States may act only as advisors. They cannot prevent National Grand Jury action unless that action violates the duly enacted laws as originally created in the United States.

The National Grand Jury shall review and evaluate procedures, methods and systems used by federal governmental agencies to determine whether they comply with the stated objectives of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution for the United States of America as properly amended.

The National Grand Jury shall review the officers of the federal government to determine whether they are constitutionally qualified to hold office, and to determine if their actions and behavior are consistent with stated objectives of the Declaration of Independence, Constitution for the United States of America as properly amended, and the criminal law as recognized in any of the several states.

No individual grand juror, acting alone, has any power or authority. Meetings of the National Grand Jury are not open to the public. All matters discussed before the National Grand Jury and votes taken are to be kept private and confidential. The end result of inquiries into civil matters are released to the public in the form of a final report which is approved, prior to release, by the Foreperson of the National Grand Jury.

The National Grand Jury is empowered to:

  • Inquire into the condition and management of branches of the federal government and its agencies.
  • Investigate and report on the operations, accounts and records of federal officers, departments, and functions.
  • Inquire into the willful or corrupt misconduct in office of public officers.
  • Submit a final report of its findings and recommendations, no later than the end of its term, to the Presiding Juror of the National Grand Jury. “

Read more here:


67 responses to “National Grand Jury, Stephen Pidgeon, Declaration, US Constitution, Judicial system, First Amendment, Ninth Amendment, Tenth Amendment, Review Federal Government Agencies, Comply with Declaration of Independence, Constitution for USA

  1. Well, well, things are moving at breakneck speed. Here’s an article summarizing Plato’s Republic as a good prognosticator of the current state of affairs.

  2. Finally!

    This is awesome news 🙂

  3. goodtimepolitics

    Great News! We have to keep after this until the job is finished! Has everyone read this “obamas-revenge”? If not I suggest reading it, its along story and nearer to the end the better it gets!

  4. This is a great step forward. But tipping your hand to the parties being questioned will result in chaos and bad press. must be shrewd as snakes but innocent as doves

  5. Democracy is already tyranny, by its very nature. If your freedom is subject to the will of the majority, it is not really freedom but merely a temporary privilege.

    The ideal political system is not democracy, but the system of individual rights, with its expression in economics, capitalism. But a system of individual rights has nothing to do with Plato’s REPUBLIC, which can be taken as a blueprint for totalitarianism.

  6. Pingback: Obama’s Revenge « Goodtimepolitics

  7. Time to bring the light to the fight!


  9. Citizen wells, (off Topic) There is a website that has popped up in South Carolina, ( Jack Taylor) It is collecting petitions to throw out term limits at the presidential level. I’ve been on several website this morning referring to a bill that is quietly moving through Congress to do away with all term limits in Federal Govt.

  10. I pray that this will truly happen and that the usurper gets removed as soon as possible. He is not looking out for the best interest of all Americans. He is the enemy in disguise.



  13. I have one question. If he [Obama] is removed from office triggering the process for congress to qualify someone else, are all the orders, bills of legislation, and memos all null and void?

  14. USA transitioned from Republic to Democracy because of universal sufferage which results in voters voting themselves into slavery. What we need is limited suffrage achieved by a requirement that voters be licensed to vote based on testing to insure knowledge and understatnding of the Constitution. Aditionally voters should be required to take an oath to obey and defend the Constitution. We are required to take tests and obtain licences to drive a car, why not to vote? The payoff would be liberty and prosperity.

  15. decentAmerican

    Can someone please educate a legal dummy? I read the declaration and it’s all Greek to me. What does this mean exactly, namely, who will serve on this “jury”, and where will it convene, who will pay for it, etc? thanks for your help. I wanted to gather info before I spread the seemingly good news.

  16. Greg
    yes,and they are null and void even if he doesn’t get thrown out, let’s say five years from now

    so where do we all sign up to be on this grand jury????

  17. We need to act fast with the Grand Jury. God Bless America. One Nation under God.

  18. This is more detailed infor about it.
    Read more here:



    I say true AMERICAN PEOPLE!!

  21. We want to thank our extremely well informed and perceptive guest, Jaqui from Wake Up America who spent over an hour last night sharing with us the benefits of W.A.M.’s research on the Obama’s misnamed “Stimulus Plan.” Accordning to Jacqui, HR1 is only the beginning of more heinous controls and theft of America to come. She described the persistent violations of the Constitution in the actions of the various bills that are now being presented to Congress. Last night’s prgram is a benefit to all who care about America. You can listen to it at

    The best news I’ve heard in a month is the planning of the National Grand Jury. I give my 100% support of this effort as it is the among the first legal steps we can take to begin to have power over a corrupt Congress, Senate, and Supreme Court.

    Those of you who want to read “Obama’s Revenge” go to http://www.patriots-shout.blogspot,com

  22. We need to confirm with Mr. Pidgeon we have the backing of at least one Federal District Attorney for this.

    Has anyone received info from Steven on this yet?

  23. Listen to the audio as he will indicates there are people who will step up!

  24. Steve Pidgeon’s website > … you can leave a comment or ask a question

    Also, you could contact Steve Pidgeon via eMail >

    First Listen to the audio of Steve talking about the National Grand Jury, OUR Constitution and the Rule of Law, here >

  25. I want to be on the Grand Jury, but I will tell
    the truth FIRST–I am not a NBC. But,
    my hubby and everyone else is, so I can
    be on the sidelines helping.

  26. Sign me Up!!!

  27. I just left a question on Mr. Pigeon’s site. I was wondering how the nominating committee will be chosen.

    Anyone have any information or ideas?

  28. Stephen Pidgeon will apear as a guest on this Sunday evening between 8pm and 10pm Pacif Standard Time.


  29. Is a “National Grand Jury” the same as a “Federal Grand Jury”? If not, what is the difference?

  30. ccc
    I believe they are the same. In the audio, steve mentioned federal and then went to national.

  31. i keep coming here and thinking we are that rag tag revolutionary group with the bandaged head , the drum, and fife playing troopers. I keep seeing the same people. I ask myself “self, what is this all about where are we going? How are we going to get there? Our representatives are not listening, at least most of them are not. why not? ” Then I think, mass appeal. We need a greater expansion of the word. At least the gospel, for those church goers and non, the word got out slowing. Like any message, and then it erupted.

    How about a song, and celebrity, and an AD on FOXNEWS and other national networks.

    But first how about helping out Dewey here on this other thread about this topic? The more people that get the word out to various threads and news sites, the better no?

  32. Jerry A. Holloway Sr.

    Greg Goss, yes everything he has signed and everyone he has placed into his cabinet are all illegal and has to be redone or Ratified again for he did not have the legal Authority to place them or create any legislation or sign anything into law

  33. Indesian Cover up posted on Dr. Orly’s site:

  34. Indonesian, right

  35. I love sitting in fenway parks grandstand sections but I would love to sit in a national grandstand for this country to find the truth!!!!!!!!!

  36. Pingback: National Grand Jury Declaration (Obama’s Birth Cert.) « Goodtimepolitics

  37. goodtimepolitics

    Maybe if everyone could some how come together as one we would have better success! Here is the pictures (not my) from the Seattle Protest!

  38. Okay,

    But first, let’s obtain a list of all the Federal Grand Juries around the country, and going around the U.S. Attorneys, send the Juries the information we have on Ob, plus information on their Constitutional power as presented to us by Leo Donofrio.

    The Federal Grand Juries are already legally sworn and empowered to bring presentments. I’ll assume there are about two hundred of them, so there’s a reasonable chance of good result.

  39. I’m in

  40. Call me crazy but when Obama signs this fraud bill he said hes giving 45 days to states to make a decision, Since he desperately wanted to sign on presidents day, Do the math April Fools day, what a time to let the enemy fool us americans, George Washinton crossing the Delaware Chritmas eve!!! Always have to be ready!!!

  41. I found this on the right side of life for anyone that is interested.
    Update: Per the requirements, above, here is a copy of the Juror Application Form.

  42. This is the actual URL for the form to print and fill out for sending to Stephen Pidgeon.

    Click to access National_Grand_Jury_Application_Form.pdf

  43. Daverg—-
    It all does make one think,”OK how the hell are we going to do it”? We are only a few people. I don’t think that I have to tell you that there are more and more people everyday who are finally seeing the mistake that they made by voting for Obama. Now it will take one hell of a fight to dislodge him. How we do it is by banding together again, and again until we are about 250,000,000 strong then we T-E-L-L- Congress, and the SCOTUS that we are ORDERING THE REMOVAL of Obama. and if they refuse THE SCOTUS will face prosecution for their part in this by the Court of the PEOPLE,or National GRAND JURY. They will face charges of treason against the Constitution. The only viable quick means of removing Obama is via the Military. This is not very likely, although it could occur. The entire gang nof 14 in Congress need to face treason charges as well. Starting with MMMMSSSS Pelosi who has already commited proven fraud, by signing the papers that attested to Obama’s eligibility. Harry Reid is already on the hook for seating Burris. Then we keep moving down the list until we reach Charles Schumer. He belongs in a mental institution. His ranting and raving seems to be on a par with a total lunatic. In the process we don’t want to miss Jack Murtha in the clean out. He is a disgrace to the Uniform that he wore. The saddest part of all of this is that NONE OF THIS SHOULD HAVE EVER OCCURRED. It is because of GREED, and hunger for power that the LUNATIC LEFT of the Democratic party even exists. I was once a Democrat myself. Some years back I accurately read the handwriting on the wall and changed party faith. Now I too am facing a question of where do I go next. Neither party has been straight with the American people. I believe that from now on we will be faced with doing our homework, and voting for the best quality candidate based upon our own research of his/her past. Beyond that I have no answers.

  44. You do know that there’s absolutely NO chance this will happen. Mr Pidgeon is a national embarassment in this state. I practice here and know him very well. Unfortunately, Mr Pidgeon and Mr Berg and Ms Taitz’s reputations preceed them , and that’s a death nail for any of their lawsuits.

  45. I am convinced that Obama is not Barack Hussein Obama legally. I believe that he is still Barry Soetoro. If this is the case then he is NOT the elected President of the US,, and is illegally acting as president of the US. In reality there is NO legal President at this time. Barack Hussein Obama is a name only that was vacated, and as far as I can determine was NEVER legally restored. I have been researching this for over two months. Public record should exist, yet none can be found. If I am correct then the US is in DIRE trouble.

  46. Rachel // February 17, 2009 at 1:02 pm

    You do know that there’s absolutely NO chance this will happen. Mr Pidgeon is a national embarassment in this state. I practice here and know him very well. Unfortunately, Mr Pidgeon and Mr Berg and Ms Taitz’s reputations preceed them , and that’s a death nail for any of their lawsuits.

    Rachel—-If you are so high and might…why don’t you then do something to help the cause or are you an OBOT????

  47. RACHEL—
    You are obviously a supporter of the ILLEGAL POTUS. This tells me also that you have to be one of the Democratic LEFT who seem to believe that you are GOD. Well you are going to learn a very painful lesson very soon,because the rest of America WILL PREVAIL.

  48. Rachel –
    Sadly you have forgotten that they are only THREE, out of over 300,000,000 people. As each day passes there are many people seeing for the first time,the magnitude of their mistake, and are doing anything that they can to help us correct it. We recognise that this might not happen overnight but,rest assured the ILLEGAL PRESIDENT WILL BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE whether you like it or not.

  49. Is there a difference between a national grand jury and a federal grand jury? Does the grand jury investigations have to be approved by the Assistant Attorney General? Isn’t it David S. Kris, of Maryland?
    What are the chances of this hitting a wall because of the nature of the investigation?

  50. Jerry A. Holloway Sr.

    Jackie Smith , I say you add your credentials to the mix and make this stand for something and we can all get the Usurper out of Office and out of the Country. To me that seems the best answer instead of stateing they have not got the right credentials , show us all your willing to fight for this Country of OURS the United States of America.

  51. Rachel, please, to what are you referring when you write, ‘there’s no chance this will happen’? (You also misspoke when you referred to spoiled reputations as a “death nail” for lawsuits filed by the practitioners you name. The appropriate term is “death knell,” meaning, sounding defeat. But notwithstanding the reputations to which you refer, nothing could defeat these lawsuits that are legally sound.)

  52. rachel
    what are you saying their reputation preceedes them?

    what did Taitz ever do ?

  53. Jerry A. Holloway Sr. // February 17, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    Jackie Smith , I say you add your credentials to the mix and make this stand for something and we can all get the Usurper out of Office and out of the Country. To me that seems the best answer instead of stateing they have not got the right credentials , show us all your willing to fight for this Country of OURS the United States of America.

    Jerry—I think you mean Rachel—I didn’t say I practice law….she did! I was asking her to do the same since she seems to be so high and mighty!!

  54. Jerry A. Holloway Sr.

    I do Apologize Jackie I miss that it wasn’t you but it was Rachel, I hope you accept my apology

  55. Jerry A. Holloway Sr.

    Oh BTW Rachel I checked on Stephen Pidgeon and it seems he has some very impressive credntials now lets see what your credentials are. anyone wanting to see Stephen Pidgeon’s crendentials click his Underlined name in the Header to the Declaration of the National Grand Jury statement above

  56. Jerry A. Holloway Sr. // February 17, 2009 at 5:26 pm

    I do Apologize Jackie I miss that it wasn’t you but it was Rachel, I hope you accept my apology
    Jerry–Apology accepted. I figured you didn’t see I had copied Rachel’s comments and you only saw my name at the top. I want to add to your second post as well. Mr. Pidgeon is also a very upstanding strong Christian with wonderful ethical principals. I too would like to see Rachel’s credentials!!!

  57. CW. I posed this question above “I have one question. If he [Obama] is removed from office triggering the process for congress to qualify someone else, are all the orders, bills of legislation, and memos all null and void?”

    And there were two responses to that question and both said that yes his legislation and appointments are not valid. Given that angle could we be more persuasive in getting republican support in the house and the senate. Kind of a carrot on a stick approach….after all nobody in congress does nothing for nothing.

  58. Good question Greg.
    Obama is not president by law, so anything he signs is not legally
    enacted into law.

  59. Any doubters out there? Well if you hand the US military a grand jury inditments from the people, their first oath is to defend the constitution not the president, So get behind this and let the halls of justice take over

  60. Jerry A. Holloway Sr.

    I am from S.C. and I have been constantly e-mail Lindsey Graham and Jim DeMint about the fact his Hawaian Certification of Live Birth ( it being from someone that has lived in Hawaii for a period of 1 year no matter where he was born on this planet ) is not the same as the born on American/Hawaian soil Birth Certificate

  61. Count me in, I’m new here and I want to stay.


  63. Pingback: Resolving the Obama Birth Certificate Issue Quickly: Quo Warranto « Just Americans Making Ethical Statements Weblog

  64. I find it hard to believe that Rachel is a practicing attorney and cannot spell precede. Her grammar leaves a lot to be desired also.

  65. Article 1, Section 8 provides Congress with certain powers. One of those powers is to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested by the Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
    The Constitution was written in the 18th century, and many of the ideas, concepts and phrases are ambiguous by today’s understanding. The establishment of the U.S. Code, and Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are written to carry out Constitutional provisions for the protected rights of citizens on both sides — the accused and victims.
    The “birthers” as they have become called, insist that the 5th Amendment gives them authority to convene as a Grand Jury and indict President Obama on their allegation that he is not a natural born United States citizen. After having all their cases dismissed by decisions of the courts, their most recent common law grand jury escapade is likened to reading two sentences of a medical book and concluding that they have correctly diagnosed a medical condition and how to treat it on behalf of “We the People.” They are extremely mistaken.
    By comparison, a person cannot admit himself to the hospital on his diagnosis alone. He must be examined by a physician. The physician may call in other physicians and maybe also have specialists to confirm that the person requires medical care and the treatment. The ordering of tests and procedures to determine illness follow a chain of command or authority.
    No one would want just anyone sticking a needle in their arm to take blood. They would want to make sure that the person is a trained employee of the hospital, the purpose for taking blood, and that a doctor has ordered it.
    Common folk meeting in someone’s barn or dining room, calling themselves a Grand Jury, and sending their indictment to government officials, is in violation of the Constitution, as they are in violation of clearly established judicial rules and procedures that were written in the keeping of carrying out of the Constitution.
    The 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution set forth due process. Due process as proposed by the founding fathers has been incorporated into the constitutions of all the states. “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law.”
    The 5th Amendment sets forth in pertinent part:
    “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, ….”
    The birthers have stopped at that point, without considering the 5th Amendment as a whole. The 5th Amendment protects people from being held for committing a crime unless they are properly indicted; that they may not be tried twice for the same crime; that they need not be forced to testify against themselves; and that property not be taken without just compensation. It also contains due process guarantees. One of the guarantees most people have heard of is “pleading the fifth.”
    Due process applies to all phases of a criminal proceeding, starting with any pre-trial activities such as arrests, interrogations, and searches of property. Officials cannot lawfully create rules as they go along. The rights of individuals must be protected from the very beginning and this required the establishment and passing of rules to keep things consistent. People might be familiar with Miranda rights as an established rule to protect the due process rights of individuals.
    After considering the 5th Amendment as a whole, we must also know how the government describes the carrying out of the 5th Amendment in regards to the Grand Jury. In 1976, in a case called United States vs. Mandujano, Justice Potter Stewart said the following in regards to the Grand Jury Clause:
    “[The grand jury’s] historic office has been to provide a shield against arbitrary or oppressive action, by insuring that serious criminal accusations will be brought only upon the considered judgment of a representative body of citizens acting under oath and under judicial instruction and guidance.”
    This is the way in which the Constitution’s Grand Jury Clause has been historically understood – as a body of citizens acting under oath AND under judicial instruction and guidance.
    The courts cannot have citizens running renegade, meeting as a Grand Jury to indict a neighbor of stealing a rose bush. Especially considered is if they do so when local law enforcement already determined that the neighbor has a receipt for purchasing the rose bush that the store verified.
    Now, I suppose that someone can allege that the receipt is fake and the store owner is in cohorts with the neighbor, but that does not give them constitutional authority to attempt to circumvent the police investigation by establishing their own lynch mob.
    The authority to call forth a Grand Jury clearly lies with “the court.” The birthers might argue that the Constitution does not say that only a court can call forth the Grand Jury. Well, by the same token, it doesn’t say that any group of citizens can meet, calling themselves a “Grand Jury” and giving themselves authority to present an indictment. And, this now goes back to and ties in with Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution that grants Congress powers to make laws.
    Congress passed the Rules Enabling Act and placed it into U.S. law at 28 U.S.C. Sections 2072 and 2074, giving the Supreme Court of the United States statutory authority to make Rules. The Rules coincide with the Judiciary Act of 1789 that gives the federal courts power to establish “all necessary rules for the orderly conducting [of] business.”
    It is logical to conclude that the court’s requirements for the Grand Jury fall under “all necessary rules for the orderly conducting of business.”

    With the Sumners Courts Act of 1940, Congress granted authority to the Supreme Court to write and establish the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure became effective on March 21, 1946. The Rules were adopted for three main reasons. The first reason for the adoption of the Rules is designed to abolish the technicalities which led to the dismissal of cases or the reversal of convictions for reasons unconnected with the guilt or innocence of the defendant.
    The second reason for the promulgation of the Federal Rules is to ensure “fairness in administration.” The final reason given for the adoption of the Rules is to eliminate “unjustifiable expense and delay.”
    Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6 subsection (a)(1) clearly sets forth:
    “When the public interest so requires, the court must order that one or more grand juries be summoned. A grand jury must have 16 to 23 members, and the court must order that enough legally qualified persons be summoned to meet this requirement.”

    Rule 6, subsection (b)(1) provides that “the government or defendant may challenge the grand jury on the ground that it was not lawfully drawn, summoned, or selected, and may challenge an individual juror on the ground that the juror is not legally qualified.”
    The birthers may not realize that their actions can be challenged by U.S. Attorney General Holder. If he does, I would pay to be present.
    Now, we come to the point of the 5th Amendment’s “capital” and “infamous” crimes definitions. Almost everyone understands that a “capital crime” is a crime where the punishment is death or life in prison. Could the birthers believe that President Obama has committed any crime deserving of death? Or, is it their contention that President Obama has committed an “infamous” crime?
    In United States v. Moreland, 1924, the Supreme Court ruled that an infamous crime is one in which the punishment for the crime could be a prison sentence. This would mean that the birthers are alleging that if President Obama is not a natural born United States citizen, that he is deserving of a prison sentence. I don’t think there are any laws that imprison illegal immigrants – sending them back to their country in which they are a citizen maybe – but not putting them in prison.
    Even if the birthers’s allegations are true, (and federal courts have decided they are not), there is no written law coinciding with the 5th Amendment in which relief can be granted to the birthers.
    Effectively, our rights as American citizens cannot be protected if Court Rules are violated. The same Rules that protects citizens by requiring that evidence be presented in a certain matter so that charges are not dismissed on technicalities sending the alleged guilty free, also protects the Constitutional due process rights of the accused. We cannot have it one way without the other.

  66. No court has yet agreed to allow the case against obama to proceed. The man is obviously hiding something. He’s spent a fortune bullying courts and petitioners to keep this issue out of court. Various judges have used arguments such claiming that the petitioner had “no standing” to avoid adjudicating what may well become the hottest of all time hot potatoes in history. Even John Roberts has tried to duck this one and he has sworn to protect the constitution and is being paid to do exactly that. The constitution is not a document to be interpreted, as many would claim, “according to the times, but instead, it is to be used to judge issues before the court according to ‘original intent.’ If the framers and founders of our country said that only a naturally born citizen can be our president, then that is easily interpreted. It doesn’t mean other than what it says. If obama was born in Kenya, he can’t be our president. If he was born in Africa he knew it and he’s a fraud and imposter and has committed a crime against the American people and disgraced our constitution. If the punishment for crime this is jail or death for a treasonous act, then so be it.

  67. The corrupt,cowardly criminals in congress cover up crimes
    by the fbi/cia and in return the fbi/cia allow them to do pretty much as they please.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s