Philip J Berg questions and answers, Jeff Schreiber interview, Berg answers, January 5, 2009, Interpleader explained, Air Force colonel Hollister, Obama ineligible, Obama not natural born citizen, Constitutional crisis, US Supreme Court

Whether you agree or not with everything that Philip J Berg believes,
the man deserves a lot of credit for his efforts to hold Barack
Obama accountable in regard to presidential eligibility. Likewise,
Jeff Schreiber, a law student,legal writer and blog owner has done
a great job of covering the Philip J Berg lawsuits. Here are some
exerpts from questions Jeff Schreiber asked of Mr. Berg:
Jeff Schreiber reports:
Questions and answers with Philip J Berg.

“As an aside, despite the way he is painted by supporters and detractors alike,
and despite his views on the attacks of September 11, 2001–which I absolutely
abhor and he knows it–I’ve always found Berg to be rational and to be gracious.
I spoke with him this weekend, and this is the result.”

“You filed a new lawsuit last week. Tell me about it.

This lawsuit is an interpleader action, and the reason we went this way is
because an interpleader action will shift the burden of proof to Barack Obama.
Notice that we didn’t sue Obama, though. We sued Barry Soetoro, mainly because
we believe that is his real name. We’ve seen no documentation showing that he
has changed his name from Soetoro to Obama. So, when he was registering himself
in all of the states—and there are 50 states, Barack—he was registering with
the wrong name. That’s fraud. His name was Barry Soetoro when he was adopted in
Indonesia, and nothing shows that it has been changed since.

Take for example if I adopt someone from Kenya, if I adopt a girl from Kenya,
she would take my last name, Berg. And, if anything changed in the future, if
she wanted to use another name for any reason, she would have to legally change
that name.”
“Tell me about Col. Hollister.

Col. Hollister, the plaintiff, is a retired Air Force colonel, he’s about 52
years old or so, and served this country from 1978 to 1998 before being honorably
discharged. During that time, when he served this country, he swore to protect
America against all enemies foreign and domestic – which is interesting because,
right now, we may have a domestic crisis going on.

Hollister contacted us. He’s not the only military man we’ve had contact us in
hopes to help. We’ve had quite a few who, over the past few months, called to offer
their support. He called us because he is perplexed. Here he is, on the Individual
Ready Reserve—meaning that he is able, that he is subject to Presidential recall
now and for the rest of his life—and he sees what’s going on across the world and
he’s perplexed as to whether he could, if called up to serve again, follow orders
from a Commander in Chief who may or may not be constitutionally eligible for that
position. If Obama is sworn in on January 20th, if he takes that Oath of Office,
he is usurping the powers of the president of the United States. And, when the
truth comes out, and it will, it will mean that all of Obama’s laws and orders will
be deemed invalid and will come back.

So Col. Hollister is perplexed. If he is called up, he has a duty to obey lawful
orders from the Commander in Chief and on down the chain of command. And he would
also have a duty to disobey unlawful orders. He took an Oath of Enlistment to fight
for and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, but he’s
confused because he doesn’t know who these duties will be owed to if Obama is sworn
in. Is he qualified to be Commander in Chief? What if he was born in Kenya? What if
he is an illegal alien?”

“Speaking of timing, what do you think is the significance of January 9th? Is it
significant? Why do you think you were the first case into the Supreme Court, but
the last case out?

I don’t want to say anything to blow it, you know, but I think we’ve got a great shot.
They could have thrown us out weeks ago. January 9th could very well be a significant
day in all of this, because Obama will actually be president elect instead of

On November 4th, he just got the popular votes. We tried to show that he shouldn’t
have been on the ballot so we could avoid a constitutional crisis, but that obviously
didn’t work. On December 15th, he just got the electoral votes. We pushed to stop
that vote but were obviously unsuccessful. Those votes will be counted on Thursday,
and barring anything drastic like a congressman standing up to protect, he will
finally be President-Elect Barack Obama.”
“Let’s say for a moment that it works. Obama is deemed ineligible. What next for the
country? What next for you?

I don’t know. It depends upon when Barack Obama is declared ineligible. If it happens
before Thursday, it means one thing. If it happens after Thursday but before January
20th, it means another thing. If it happens after January 20th, it appears that Biden
would be president, but who knows? After all, he was selected by someone who shouldn’t
have been running for president and selecting vice presidents in the first place.

I just hope and pray, every night, for calm and peace in this country, and if Obama is
found to be unqualified, I would urge political and cultural leaders to come forth with
something like a national broadcast and appeal for peace. This was Barack Obama’s doing,
this was caused by one man, and nobody else. In fact, Barack Obama himself come out and
say “I’m proud to have made history on November 4th, in getting more votes than anybody
else, but because of some issues with my past, I have no choice but to step down.” And
he should appeal for peace and calm.”

Read the rest of this great article here:

18 responses to “Philip J Berg questions and answers, Jeff Schreiber interview, Berg answers, January 5, 2009, Interpleader explained, Air Force colonel Hollister, Obama ineligible, Obama not natural born citizen, Constitutional crisis, US Supreme Court

  1. I disagree with Berg’s statement about Obama stepping down.

    I agree he should be carted off to jail in cuffs by the FBI, never to be seen or heard from again, in true, unadulterated, criminal form.

  2. And by carted off to jail, I mean Obama, not Berg.

  3. Citizen, keep up the great work you are doing.
    I am heading south for a little R&R (w/o my computer-it’s going to kill me!)
    God bless you!

  4. citizenwells

    Thanks Kim and all.

  5. ANOTHER HALL OF SHAME…the great savior of the super majority Saxby Chambliss who I wrote emailed me back with this:

    Thank you for contacting me to share your concerns over President-elect Obama’s citizenship. I appreciate hearing from you.

    Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution states, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” President-elect Obama demonstrated his citizenship during his campaign by circulating copies of his birth certificate, which showed he was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961.

    On December 8, 2008, the Supreme Court declined to hear a case filed by a New Jersey attorney, Mr. Donofrio, regarding President-elect Obama’s citizenship. Unlike many of the lawsuits regarding President-elect Obama’s citizenship, which claim he was really born on foreign soil, Mr. Donofrio’s case concedes that President-elect Obama was born in Hawaii but contends he still held foreign citizenship at birth. Mr. Donofrio’s lawsuit argues that since President-elect Obama’s father was a Kenyan citizen and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of President-elect Obama’s birth, then Obama was a British citizen at birth and not eligible to be President of the United States.

    Another attorney, Mr. Berg, has filed a lawsuit regarding President-elect Obama’s citizenship and is waiting to hear whether the Supreme Court will take up the case or not. A federal judge in Eastern Pennsylvania threw out Mr. Berg’s lawsuit in October, saying he lacked legal standing to bring the challenge since he could not show he faced individual harm even if he could prove his claims about President-elect Obama’s citizenship. The judge did not get to the merits of the case. Mr. Berg is appealing the standing issue to the Supreme Court.

    If a person is born in the United States, a certificate of live birth issued where one is born is sufficient proof of U.S. citizenship. The certificate, confirmed by the Hawaii Department of Health as authentic, shows that President-elect Obama was born in Hawaii.

    If you would like to receive timely email alerts regarding the latest congressional actions and my weekly e-newsletter, please sign up via my web site at: . Please let me know whenever I may be of assistance.

    Who will stand up? I am just sick

  6. Citizenwells,
    ‘A little off topic and possibly silly but…has anyone contacted any foreign leaders or dignitaries to provide them with the Obama ineligibility information in order to request that they put pressure on the U.S. government to ensure a legal presidential appointment? They should know that any government business they conduct with BHO would be unlawful and possibly very dangerous. Sorry if it’s a dumb question.

  7. Oh, my goodness, Caring, that’s such an excellent question. No joke! I have never thought of that.

  8. Caring,
    I’m not sure how what you suggest would be
    handled, but I agree with your frustration in
    looking outside of our own country, hoping
    that there are more agressive leaders
    willing to step up. I can’t believe pe select
    is still acting as though he has done nothing
    illegal. He cannot get away with this

  9. Suggestion to Congress:

    Seat Burris.
    Unseat Obama.

  10. Caring, I would be very careful about that if I were you. With the “changes” coming, who knows what kind of punishment Obamanutjobs will feel is necessary for someone exercising freedom of speech outside the USA? You saw what happened to Joe the Plumber.

    It is really scary, that’s why this usurper-to-be needs to be stopped in his tracks. There certainly are enough reasons for the long arm of the law to grab him.

  11. Jacqlyn Smith

    I hope some of you are listening to Plains Radio tonight. They have a Dr. David Hagen on who has a PHD and he is informing everyone of the Point of Order ….Petitition for redress that can come from not only a Senator or a Representative but also an ordinary citizen can present it to a Senator or Congressman to file on their behalf. WE CAN ALL DO THIS AND STOP OBAMA!!!! He says we can do it all up until March if it takes that long. He says the 20th Amendment in the Constitution gives us that right and everyone needs to visit this amendment. Also…go to his Website to print out your very own copy of the Point of order paperwork. Do it now and get it to your Senator and Congressman before Thursday if possible. This is an unbelievable revelation and Obama will be required to show his documents because the burden of proof is now on him!!! Found out all of this on the Plains Radio Show tonight!

  12. Jacqlyn,
    I’m not convinced that the 20th amendment gives citizens the right to point of order. As I read the 20th amendment, per your request, I read that it allows congress to move the inaugural date from March 4th to January 20th. But then again, I’m a software engineer and not a constitutional scholar.

  13. I know I am going against the grain on this site but I still believe that the 14 th amendment along with Title 8 Section 1401 of the U.S. Code fills in those gaps of who is qualified to be president. I heard all the arguements from this site, but this will be used in court. Under those two statues, I believe he is qualified. This is my opposing view.

  14. Jacqlyn Smith

    gholtron // January 6, 2009 at 12:52 am

    I’m not convinced that the 20th amendment gives citizens the right to point of order. As I read the 20th amendment, per your request, I read that it allows congress to move the inaugural date from March 4th to January 20th. But then again, I’m a software engineer and not a constitutional scholar.

    sorry gholtron—it is the 10th . Get the paperwork at and you will see. This is power in our hands that people are not aware of. If you listen to the Plains Radio Show archived Jan. 5th you will hear Dr. David Hagen talk about it and what we need to do. Everyone please do this!!!

  15. Jacqlyn Smith

    gholtron—It’s not the 10th either. I’m not sure. I was taking notes as he talked and may have written down the wrong thing. Just go to the website I listed and Dr. Hagen explains what the Amendment is and what citizens need to do.

  16. There is no such right to make a point of order. Even if both a Senator and Congressman make an objection, the houses will meet to discuss the objection and the objection will be overruled overwhelming.

    People are desparately grasping at straws.

    Nothing will come of this or the lawsuits. You need to wake up and smell the coffee.

  17. I just learned that there where objections brought up when congress counted the 2000 vote and all that happened was that then VP Al Gore overruled them. I hope that if they do manage to bring up objections on Thursday that it’s not just swept under the rug simply because they think they can.

  18. Pingback: Hollister vs Soetoro lawsuit, Colonel Gregory S. Hollister, Air Force colonel, US Military, Philip Berg lawsuit, Obama not eligible, Obama not natural born citizen, Commander in Chief, unlawful orders, defend the Constitution, Oath « Congress Watch

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s