Philip J Berg lawsuit, Washington Times Ad, US Supreme Court appeal, Obama not eligible, US Constitution must be upheld, November 17, 2008

The Philip J Berg lawsuit that states that Barack Obama is not eligible to be president is still before the
Supreme Court of the United States. Mr. Berg and many citizens insist that we uphold the US Constitution.
Mr. Berg has an ad in the Washington Times for Monday, November 17, 2008.


Help Philip J Berg uphold the Constitution:


23 responses to “Philip J Berg lawsuit, Washington Times Ad, US Supreme Court appeal, Obama not eligible, US Constitution must be upheld, November 17, 2008

  1. Alan Keyes answers Obama’s Kenyan Birth Question here:

    Steve Matzberg Show (WABC, New York, August 15, 2004)

    MALZBERG: And, of course, Obama born to a Kenyan and, I believe, a white American female–you believe without that history cannot feel what you feel to that extent?

    KEYES: Well, I wouldn’t want to make any judgments, but I think that folks need to think about this, because the contrast in our views is related to the fact that I have been wrestling with something all my life that perhaps he hasn’t had to take as seriously.

  2. Good day, Mr. Wells

    Thanks for sharing this post. Also, Bob, thanks for sharing the Keyes archives too. Wish Mr. Obama would simply schedule a news conference and share his birth-certificate openly with the American people, so we can move on towards solving the sad state of the present economy and focus on winning the wars abroad.


  3. An actual exchange between Keyes and Obama concerning Obama’s Kenyan ancestry took place on This Week with George Stephanopoulos (ABC): (halfway down the transcript)

    STEPHANOPOULOS: But what about this issue that you, as a son of an African father have a different perspective from he, the grandson, great-grandson of slaves?

    OBAMA: Well, keep in mind, first of all, that my grandfather in Africa was a domestic servant for the British and carried a pass book around. I don’t know whether the point he was trying to make is that on the hierarchy of victim-hood, that somehow, you know, he is more qualified to speak for the oppressed. I’m–you know, so that’s something that we would have to explore further. That’s not, I don’t think, a particularly relevant criteria by which we’re going to make a decision about who’s the best United States Senator from Illinois.

  4. Why do people think Keyes is such a kook? (Not you guys here, but I’ve heard it said on other forum.) He is a constitutional scholar and has a degree from Harvard, not exactly small potatoes.

  5. This is an entry in Wikipedia that is on-the-mark — (remember, you can’t believe EVERYTHING you read there) —

    ‘NATURAL BORN” was inserted into the Constitution after receiving a letter from John Jay, later first Chief Justice of the United States, to bolster the COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF clause:

    The issue was again, “Allegiance” –, i. e. “Loyalty.”

    The symbol of our American sovereignty is the American Flag. That is why we as Americans are happy to “Pledge Allegiance to the Flag” whenever we can.

    “It is thought the origin of the natural-born citizen clause can be traced to a letter of July 25, 1787 from John Jay (who was born in New York City) to George Washington (who was born in Virginia), presiding officer of the Constitutional Convention.

    “John Jay wrote: ‘Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.’

    “There was no debate, and this qualification for the office of the Presidency was introduced by the drafting Committee of Eleven, and then adopted without discussion by the Constitutional Convention.”

    So, when William Ayers is photographed in Hyde Park stomping on the American Flag, he’s stomping on our sovereignty as a nation — it is a “despicable act.”

    Just meditate on that for a little while.

  6. Does Obama always say that phrase? “…, so that’s something that we would have to explore further.”

    Seems I here him say that all the time. However, when it comes to his COLB he doesn’t want to explore it further. What did McCain present and who did he present it to? If Obama only has to go the House or Senate and show his BC, then that’s easy as one, two, three. I mean Pelosi would probably even dim the lights for him so people couldn’t really get a good look at it. Why won’t he show his COLB for unity even? There is no reason not to show it to the public if it would get that many more people to stand behind you as President. By now you could have put in an excellent forgery to show to the people and have the same effect, so why not show something?

    I still think he would have to be eligible to get this far, but I’m a skeptic by nature so I can see where there could be some fishy stuff going on. If he would just present something, I might even believe him. I’m sure there are plenty more like me out there.

    However, based on the way Mr. Obama changes his story every month when it comes to his agenda as President, I’m sure we will never get a straight answer out of him on this issue either.

  7. Second paragraph, first line: hear

  8. I have tried to go on the “african press internation site ” and it has been shut down? I was on it Saturday the and heard the phone conversation with API and Michelle Obama. please let me know what is going on ! Judie from Jax.

  9. Oh, my dear friends – on this eve of great hope, and many lawsuits “in the works” – I bring great despair and a sense of woe. I have been following all this for months, helping goad things along, and contribute any way I can.

    But last night I woke up in a cold sweat (literally) with a deep assurance (i.e. the unflappable belief of a new religious convert) that this will not end well. Obama will either stall indefinitely or will actually produce a sufficiently “authentic” set of documents so as to put this all to bed. My new belief is based on a simple thought: How could it end any other way?

    Today, I’m not talking about civil unrest or hordes of disappointed minions. I am not talking about the potential refusal of the courts to hear the cases. I am not talking about any legislative action to deflect from the core issue. I am talking simple MECHANICS.

    Even if SCOTUS jumped on this hard and demanded a FULL and COMPLETE investigation, how could that possibly happen. I can’t imagine a procedure or process that would guarantee the truth. I hope some wise readers here or legal experts can explain this to me.

    If what we think is true, this is the biggest, most profound, most far reaching event to ever hit any court anywhere anytime – in the history of the universe. It is totally unprecedented, in all meanings of that word. Obama has unlimited resources and motivation. Many of his resources are shady and have been known to do ANYTHING to promote a cause. If this had been addressed earlier, maybe it could have been dealt with. As it sits right now, there is too much money, too much energy, and too many expectations all invested in this. It can’t fail. It can’t be allowed to fail. It cannot be stopped. Under any circumstances. Period.

    There are unlimited people and unlimited money to throw at this problem.

    Perhaps this is what the MSM and even the likes of Hannity and Limbaugh know. The answer simply cannot come up other than one way. The concept of truth no longer has any meaning in this context. There is literally and mechanically no way to ever get the ground truth. So in a deep philosophical way, there is no truth. There is ONLY the narrative.

    Please, please. Somebody tell me I’m wrong. Walk me through the mechanics. Paint me a scenario!

  10. Some things transcend a physical reality.
    US Constitution.

  11. PS-Money can buy none of them.

  12. Citizen,

    I agree with the first three, I wonder about the US Constitution.

  13. I like so many others have fought hard against an Obama presidency.

    It is atypical for me to get involved in political matters to this degree, but I did, knowing from early on that the powers that be were far greater
    than most could imagine.

    I feared the predetermined quality of this election the most, so contrary to any postmortem analysis of what might have happened, the unravelling of results were in lockstep to strategies unbeknownst to many.

    But as with any system, there are always one or many chinks to the armour, so the efforts must continue. Now more than ever.


    This is a mind numbing video. The strategists knew what they were doing to usher Obama into office.

    They had to have been terrified of Larry’s Sinclair’s story.

  15. People, WE have been too lax in our free and wonderful USA! There have been soooo many prayers for our Nation, and it seems to no avail. But God is still in control! It is hard to believe, but…we do have to be diligent in our work toward a free Nation. Our “freedoms” have been our undoing! We have been too lax about our borders, too many people are greedy and we let our greedy leaders have all the twists and turns without holding them accountable! Ever heard of a man named Noah? Ever heard of Sodom and Gamorah? Sounds like we might have to experience a little hardship now that we have planted a few wild seeds, it might be “harvest time”. I hope that we can have a little more calm before the storm, but I think we are dead ducks.

  16. Please clarify.

  17. Do you know why African Press International is shut down? Is anything known about the status of Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate & Michelle’s tapes?

  18. Free people voted to be slaves

  19. You gotta hear this 90 minute blogradio on why the media has a blackout of the looming Obama Birth Certificate Constitutional Crisis:

  20. The strongest part of the Berg case, in my opinion, are the complaints relative to Obama’s activities when he is NOT “in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” (14th Amendment).

    Why? Well, just think of Robert E. Lee. He was certainly a “natural born citizen,” but he undertook a number actions (like Gettysburg) that took himself outside the “jurisdiction of the United States.”

    So, you see, simply being born in Hawaii is not enough. You CAN actually do things during your lifetime that interrupt your “eligibility” to be the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States.

    So, when Berg case complains that Obama traveled on an Indonesian passport, that just might be one of those interruptions (but its hard to prove).

    I think the far more serious complaints are the things that Obama is alleged to have done while he was serving as a US Senator from Illinois — namely, his political campaigning in his father’s native Kenya for a member of his father’s native tribe.

    He did this as an adult — and only in the last few years — with witnesses in tow, and while in the pay of the U.S. government. Those activities appear to me to be living proof of his “divided loyalties,” engaging in activities NOT “within the jurisdiction of the United States.” They may even have been violations of law.

    So, the “interrupted jurisdiction” allegations in Berg’s suit are really the strongest parts of his case, and should not be ignored by SCOTUS.

  21. There’s been an update on the SCOTUS site
    for Berg:
    Nov.18 2008 Waiver if respondents Federal Election Commission, et al to respond filed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s