Tag Archives: May 27

Philip J Berg, Update, May 27, 2009, Press release, Third Circuit Court of Appeals Delays Oral Argument, Berg Appeal regarding No Standing Issue

Posted on May 27, 2009 | 52 comments

From Philip J Berg, May 27, 2009:

For Immediate Release:  – 05/27/2009   

For Further Information Contact: 

Philip J. Berg, Esquire  

555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12                                                         

Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531

Cell (610) 662-3005

(610) 825-3134

(800) 993-PHIL  [7445]

Fax (610) 834-7659  

philjberg@obamacrimes.com

Third Circuit Court of Appeals Delays Oral Argument on
Berg’s Appeal regarding “No Standing” Issue
But Berg is determined to continue his fight to show that
Obama is Constitutionally ineligible to be President because Obama is “not” natural born as required by our U.S. Constitution
obamacrimes.com is the web site for the truth about Obama

 
   

      (Lafayette Hill, PA – 05/27/2009) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the first Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of Constitutional “qualifications/eligibility” to serve as President of the United States and his cases that are still pending, Berg vs. Obama [2 cases – 1 under seal] and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, et al announced today that he is totally disappointed that the Third Circuit Court of Appeals has delayed “Oral Argument” in the case of Berg vs. Obama, No. 08 – 4340, the case where Judge Surrick denied Berg’s case on the basis that Berg did not have “standing.”

      Berg stated, “About two [2] months ago I received notice that the Third Circuit would schedule ‘Oral Argument’ the last week of May 2009 or the first week of June 2009.  Not hearing for a specific date, Berg’s office contacted the Third Circuit and was just advised that “Oral Argument” is not scheduled as previously advised and the earliest time for ‘Oral Argument’ is in September or October of 2009, and notification will be sent.  I am totally disappointed that there has been this delay.”

      Berg continued, “I am determined to keep fighting lawfully through our Court system; I believe there is a Judge or Justices that will grant us Discovery as it is essential for the following that the truth be told:

  •  
    • the 305+ million citizens of the United States;
    • our ‘Forefathers;’ and
    • the 3 + million that have been injured or died defending our U.S. Constitution over the past 230 + years.

 

      We must expose Obama, as this is the greatest ‘HOAX’ perpetrated on the citizens of the United States in 230 years, since our nation was established.  Obama must be legally removed from office.

      I believe that 10 to 15 million people are aware of the Obama ‘HOAX,’ and we must make 75 million people aware.  When people are made aware of the Obama ‘HOAX,’ that Obama has not proven he is constitutionally ‘qualified/eligible’ to be President; that Obama has not produced his original (vault version) ‘Birth Certificate;’ that Obama has not produced legal documents to show he legally changed his name from his ‘adopted’ name of ‘Barry Soetoro’ from Indonesia; they will demand Obama be removed from his Office of President of the United States.”  

      The following is an update on my three [3] pending cases regarding my challenge to Obama’s lack of qualifications/eligibility to be President.  

    As you know, Berg was the first to legally raise the issue – having filed a lawsuit on August 21, 2008, before the DNC Convention.   
 

Status of Cases:  

Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340

Brief have been filed by all parties.

This is case that was dismissed in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of PA

Judge Surrick dismissed for lack of “standing” by Philip J. Berg

This is case that I bypassed Third Circuit to U.S. Supreme Court – where U.S. Supreme Court denied several Injunctions and to hear case.

However, case is still alive in Third Circuit.

Oral argument was scheduled for the end of May 2009; now the earliest will be September or October 2009.   

Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court

Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed.  

Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama,

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, No. 09-5080

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-02254

This is the case of retired Air Force Colonel Hollister who is on lifetime Presidential recall.

Hollister needs to know if recalled by Soetoro/Obama – must he obey an Order by legal President or disobey the illegal Order by a constitutionally ineligible/unqualified “Usurper” President.

Case was dismissed and Sanction of “Reprimand” imposed on our local attorney.

Appeal has been filed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

 
 

 
  For copies of all Press Releases and Court Pleadings, go to:

obamacrimes.com

52 Comments

Posted in Announcements, Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Berg, Birth Certificate, Chief Justice, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Civil Complaint, COLB, Colonel Hollister, Court of Appeals, Democrats, District Court, Election, Election 2008, Election Law, Electoral College, Federal Court, Government, Hawaii, Hollister lawsuit, indictment, Judges, Kenya, Natural born citizen, News, Obama, Obama indictment, Obama records, PHILIP J. BERG, Politics, press conference, Senator Obama, Supreme Court, Supreme Court Justice, The Case Against Barack Obama, U.S. Supreme Court, United States, US Constitution, US Department of Justice, US District Court, US Military, Usurper, Voter fraud, voters, Washington DC

Tagged , , , , , ,

Murray v. Geithner, Judge Denies Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, May 27, 2009, Defendant Timothy Geithner, AIG, Sharia Law, Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 challenged

Posted on May 27, 2009 | 7 comments

Phil at the Right Side of Life reports:

“Murray v. Geithner: Judge Denies Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss RE: AIG, Sharia Law”

“The Thomas More Law Center had originally filed suit in December of 2008 challenging the constitutionality of a portion of the “Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008” (EESA) that appropriated $40 billion in taxpayer money to fund the federal government’s majority ownership interest in AIG, which engages in Shariah-based Islamic religious activities that the Center considers are “anti-American, anti-Christian, anti-Jewish.”

They now report that Federal District Court Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff has denied the Defendant’s (Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and the Federal Reserve Board) Motion to Dismiss:”

“In his well-written and detailed analysis issued yesterday, Judge Zatkoff denied the request by the Obama administration’s Department of Justice to dismiss the lawsuit.  The request was filed on behalf of Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and the Federal Reserve Board – the named defendants in the case.  In his ruling, the judge held that the lawsuit sufficiently alleged a federal constitutional challenge to the use of taxpayer money to fund AIG’s Islamic religious activities.”

“In its request to dismiss the lawsuit, the DOJ argued that the plaintiff in the case, Kevin Murray, who is a former Marine and a federal taxpayer, lacked standing to bring the action.  And even if he did have standing, DOJ argued that the use of the bailout money to fund AIG’s operations did not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.  The court disagreed, noting, in relevant part, the following:

In this case, the fact that AIG is largely a secular entity is not dispositive: The question in an as-applied challenge is not whether the entity is of a religious character, but how it spends its grant. The circumstances of this case are historic, and the pressure upon the government to navigate this financial crisis is unfathomable.  Times of crisis, however, do not justify departure from the Constitution.  In this case, the United States government has a majority interest in AIG.  AIG utilizes consolidated financing whereby all funds flow through a single port to support all of its activities, including Sharia-compliant financing.  Pursuant to the EESA, the government has injected AIG with tens of billions of dollars, without restricting or tracking how this considerable sum of money is spent.  At least two of AIG’s subsidiary companies practice Sharia-compliant financing, one of which was unveiled after the influx of government cash.  After using the $40 billion from the government to pay down the $85 billion credit facility, the credit facility retained $60 billion in available credit, suggesting that AIG did not use all $40 billion consistent with its press release.  Finally, after the government acquired a majority interest in AIG and contributed substantial funds to AIG for operational purposes, the government co-sponsored a forum entitled “Islamic Finance 101.”  These facts, taken together, raise a question of whether the government’s involvement with AIG has created the effect of promoting religion and sufficiently raise Plaintiff’s claim beyond the speculative level, warranting dismissal inappropriate at this stage in the proceedings.”

Read more:

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=6121

7 Comments

Posted in 2009 Stimulus Bill, Announcements, Bailout, Barack Obama, Chicago machine, Citizens for the truth about Obama, Civil Complaint, corruption, Democrats, District Court, Election, Election 2008, Federal Court, Government, indictment, Judges, Justice, Muslims, News, Obama administration, Obama indictment, Obama records, Obama taxes, Politics, Secretary of the Treasury, Sharia law, The Case Against Barack Obama, Timothy Geithner, United States, US Constitution, US Department of Justice, US District Court, US Military, Washington DC, white house

Tagged , , , , , , ,