FDA to authorize Covid vaccine for children ages 12 to 15, Death risk less than .1 percent,  “vaccinate the young to protect the old” is evil and stupid, Contact FDA

FDA to authorize Covid vaccine for children ages 12 to 15, Death risk less than .1 percent,  “vaccinate the young to protect the old” is evil and stupid, Contact FDA

“Why are we vaccinating healthy adults when 81 percent of Covid-19 cases are mild and there is  a 99 percent survival rate. Why are we testing vaccines on children who are minimally impacted by the disease?”…Citizen Wells

“it is my sincere hope that this public letter might stimulate FDA, Pfizer and Moderna leaders to think critically and quickly about the immunological danger the COVID-19 vaccine might pose to those persons naturally infected by SARS-CoV-2 — most especially to those infected who are recently convalescent, asymptomatic carriers, the elderly and frail or those with significant cardiovascular risk factors.”...Dr. Hooman Noorchashm

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

From The Defender May 4, 2021.

“FDA Set to Authorize Pfizer Vaccine for Adolescents, But Some Experts Question Need, Ethics

The U.S Food and Drug Administration could by early next week expand Pfizer’s Emergency Use Authorization to include children ages 12 to 15, an age group whose risk of dying from COVID is less than 0.1%

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is preparing to authorize use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine in adolescents 12 to 15 years old by early next week, according to federal officials familiar with the agency’s plans. The vaccine is currently authorized in the U.S for emergency use in people 16 and older.

The decision, which is likely to be supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), would allow most middle and high school students to get vaccinated before summer camps and the start of the 2021-22 school year, USA TODAY reported.

The FDA will have to amend the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Pfizer’s vaccine, but the process should be straightforward, said a federal official who was not authorized to speak about the process publicly and requested anonymity.”

“A study in the European Journal of Pediatrics confirmed hospitalization and in-hospital death are rare in children diagnosed with COVID, with complications occurring mostly in those with serious underlying medical conditions.”

“Although health officials admit “kids do not generally suffer from severe COVID-19” and are unlikely to directly benefit from the injections, they have no intention of excluding children from their herd immunity calculus. Instead, they claim “inoculating [children] could reduce the spread to people at higher risk.”

In short, public health leaders say, parents must “vaccinate the young to protect the old.”””

Read more:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-authorize-pfizer-vaccine-for-adolescents-experts-question/

Dr. Josef Mengele experimented on children in Nazi Germany.

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Antrim County Michigan audit proves Dominion Voting Machines capable of flipping votes, Attorney Matthew DePerno interview on Mike Lindell’s FrankSpeech.com, Four Shocking Discoveries

Antrim County Michigan audit proves Dominion Voting Machines capable of flipping votes, Attorney Matthew DePerno interview on Mike Lindell’s FrankSpeech.com, Four Shocking Discoveries

“AG Dana Nessel kicking off her Democratic Nominating Convention by comparing President Trump to Adolf Hitler, before joking: “Hitler, by all accounts, could read and write … and he also was brave enough to serve in his nation’s military.””...Summit News Nov 13, 2020

“practice of assigning names and numbers” to non-eligible voters who did not appear in either the poll book or the supplement poll book. “…Poll worker Zachary Larsen, former MI Asst. AG

“The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate
evidence of fraud and/or to correct program errors that would de-certify the
election. Our findings show that the Central Lake Township tabulator tape totals
were significantly altered by utilizing two different program versions (10/23/2020 and 11/05/2020), both of which were software changes during an election which violates election law, and not just human error associated with the Dominion Election Management System. This is clear evidence of software generated movement of votes. The claims made on the Office of the Secretary of State website are false.”…Antrim County audit report

Attorney Matthew DePerno interview on Mike Lindell’s FrankSpeech.com

Four Shocking Discoveries from the Dominion Machines Audit in Antrim County Michigan Including Ties with China

Matthew S. DePerno, Esq.@mdeperno·

1. We can flip votes from top of the ticket to the bottom. We can flip only selected races. We can flip all. We can flip just a few precincts in a county and shave 5% from one candidate. Want a constitutional amendment to pass or fail?2. Michigan elections happening today. Do you think putting your intent on a ballot matters? Machines convert data and data can be manipulated.3. Imagine if someone wanted to move Michigan from red to pink and then run the media narrative that people just don’t like Trump. I can show you how to switch 160,000 votes at the precinct level.4. And I can support the flip with tabulator tapes at the precinct that are different than the paper ballots. Do you think our representatives will wake up? EVERYONE needs to call Sen McBoom and Sen Bizon today.

Image

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Houston nurse had Covid-19 and fired for delay in vaccination waiting for clinical trials to be completed, 2 in management resigned, Why are we vaccinating those with Covid antibodies?

Houston nurse had Covid-19 and fired for delay in vaccination waiting for clinical trials to be completed, 2 in management resigned, Why are we vaccinating those with Covid antibodies?

“Why are we vaccinating healthy adults when 81 percent of Covid-19 cases are mild and there is  a 99 percent survival rate. Why are we testing vaccines on children who are minimally impacted by the disease?”…Citizen Wells

“it is my sincere hope that this public letter might stimulate FDA, Pfizer and Moderna leaders to think critically and quickly about the immunological danger the COVID-19 vaccine might pose to those persons naturally infected by SARS-CoV-2 — most especially to those infected who are recently convalescent, asymptomatic carriers, the elderly and frail or those with significant cardiovascular risk factors.”...Dr. Hooman Noorchashm

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

This story is bigger than it seems.

2 people in management resigned rather than take the vaccine.

Nurse Michelle Fuentes already had Covid-19 and therefore the antibodies.

A proven protection against getting Covid-19 over the unproven and somewhat dangerous vaccine,

From Fox 13.

“Houston-area nurse says she was terminated for declining the COVID-19 vaccine

Houston-area woman says she was a nurse at Houston Methodist for about 10 years until this week.”

On April 1, Houston Methodist announced it would require employees to get the COVID-19 vaccine by June 7. However, the hospital system asked employees who would not get the vaccine to submit documentation for consideration for a medical or religious exemption by May 3.

Fuentes says she made a final effort to voice her concern to save her job at Houston Methodist before turning in her two-weeks notice. 

“I just needed a little bit more time and little bit more research to be done,” Fuentes stated.

She adds she wants the clinical trials to be completed before she decides to get the vaccine or not. But stresses she is not against vaccines and gets the flu vaccine every year.

A spokesperson for the hospital system says 90% of employees are vaccinated now, and only two in management have resigned so far.”

“In the meantime, Fuentes says she was prepared to wear masks at work and show lab results of COVID-19 antibodies since she’d recovered from the disease.

She adds, she regularly worked in a surgical unit, but volunteered to work in the COVID-19 unit.”

Read more:

Why are we vaccinating people who have had Covid-19?

““Retired surgeon and former U-Penn Medicine professor Dr. Hooman Noorchashm warned that orchestrating a blanket coronavirus vaccination for every American regardless of prior immunity or presence of risk factors could be a “dangerous medical approach.”

Noorchashm told Fox Nation’s “Tucker Carlson Today” that patients shouldn’t fear asking legitimate questions about the vaccine, immunity status or the vaccine “passport” system already being deployed in places like New York.”

“”Now the question is, have we done enough to make sure it’s safe in everyone. Are there categories in subset of people in whom this vaccine may actually pose some sort of risk? — I think the answer to that is yes.”

“They delivered an effective vaccine. Now, the safety part of it is what they’re making a mistake with: It’s a mistake to be vaccinating people who have had recent or current infections.””

“”If someone is natural immune there’s no reason to go and re-vaccinate them, those persons would actually be an unnecessary medical procedure … This is a very unusual thing,” he said.”

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

95.5 percent of Covid deaths are in over age 49, Why are we vaccinating and experimenting with everyone?, Why are we experimenting with children and babies?

95.5 percent of Covid deaths are in over age 49, Why are we vaccinating and experimenting with everyone?, Why are we experimenting with children and babies?

“The internal stability of a regime always becomes a source of a people’s trust and confidence. When the masses in their millions see that above them there stands a government which is sure of itself, part of this certainty is transferred to the masses. Only in this way the boldness of a government’s plans is matched by a like boldness in the readiness of the people to execute and carry into effect these plans.”…Adolf Hitler March 21, 1934

“More than 6,000 healthy children in the U.S. and Canada will be enrolled in the Moderna Covid-19 Vaccine Study for which the benefits to society are nil and the risks unknown.”...Citizen Wells

“Since there are few people who die from COVID-19 in Norway, the risk of dying after vaccination with the AstraZeneca vaccine would be higher than the risk of dying from the disease, particularly for younger people,” …NIPH, Norwegian Institute of Public Health

The numbers are straight from the CDC and inflated.

Deaths from Covid-19 by age group for over a year ending April 28, 2021.

With the following footnote:

” [1] Deaths with confirmed or presumed COVID-19″

95.5 percent of the Covid deaths were in the over age 49 groups!

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#AgeAndSex

So why are we vaccinating and experimenting on everyone???

And why are we vaccinating and using as test subjects children and babies???

Vaccinating children.

“The Nuremburg Code was drawn up by an American military tribunal during the trial of 23 Nazi physicians and scientists for atrocities they committed while carrying out so-called “medical” experiments during World War II. [Sixteen of the 23 Nazis on trial at Nuremburg were convicted, and 7 of these were executed (see Note 1)].

The Nuremberg Code’s Directives for Human Experimentation contained strongly stated guidelines. Its tenets included the need to obtain informed consent (interpreted by some to prohibit research using children), the need to minimize the risks to human subjects, and the need to insure that any risks are offset by potential benefits to society.

But, despite the well-articulated principles of the Nuremberg Code, it had little effect on research conduct in the United States. Federal rules, with the authority to regulate research conduct, would be needed for that. So, how did our current federal oversight of research come to be?”

“Now, consider Josef Mengele, a Nazi medical officer at Auschwitz, and the most infamous of the Nazi physicians. [Mengele was discussed several times at Nuremberg, but was never actually tried. Allied forces were convinced at the time that he was dead, but he had escaped to South America.] At Auschwitz, Mengele conducted germ warfare “research” in which he would infect one twin with a disease such as typhus, and then transfuse that twin’s blood into the other twin. The first twin would be allowed to die, while the second twin would be killed so that the organs of the two children might then be compared. Mengele reputedly killed fourteen twin children in a single night via a chloroform injection to the heart. Moreover, he unnecessarily amputated limbs and he experimented on pregnant women before sending them to the Auschwitz gas chambers.”

DR. Scott W. Atlas.

“Optimistically, we should be seeing the light at the end of the long tunnel with the rollout of vaccines, now being administered at a rate of one million to 1.5 million per day. On the other hand, using logic that would appeal to Lewis Carroll’s Mad Hatter, in many states the vaccines were initially administered more frequently to healthier and younger people than to those at greatest risk from the virus. The argument was made that children should be among the first to be vaccinated, although children are at extremely low risk from the virus and are proven not to be significant spreaders to adults. Likewise, we heard the Kafka-esque idea promoted that teachers must be vaccinated before teaching in person, when schools are one of the lowest risk environments and the vast majority of teachers are not high risk.”

From the NIPH, Norwegian Institute of Public Health.

“”We now know significantly more about the association between the AstraZeneca vaccine and the rare but severe incidents with low platelet counts, blood clots and haemorrhages, than when Norway decided to pause use of the AstraZeneca-vaccine in March,” says Geir Bukholm, Director of the Division of Infection Control and Environmental Health at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. 

“Based on this knowledge, we come with a recommendation to remove the AstraZeneca vaccine from the Coronavirus Immunisation Programme in Norway,” says Bukholm. 

Bukholm points out that this has not been an easy recommendation to make. It has a direct consequence for when the risk groups can receive a coronavirus vaccine, with subsequent protection, while also having an impact on when it will be possible to lift infection control measures. “

“Calculations have been performed based on Norwegian data where the risk of dying from COVID-19 disease among the different age groups is compared with the risk of dying from the severe, but rare, condition with severe blood clots observed after AstraZeneca vaccination. 

“Since there are few people who die from COVID-19 in Norway, the risk of dying after vaccination with the AstraZeneca vaccine would be higher than the risk of dying from the disease, particularly for younger people,” says Bukholm. “

Nazi Germany’s Dr. Josef Mengele

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Norway NIPH: risk higher from AstraZeneca vaccine than Covid-19, European database of vaccine injuries and deaths: 7,766 deaths and 330,218 injuries through April 17, 2021

Norway NIPH: risk higher from AstraZeneca vaccine than Covid-19, European database of vaccine injuries and deaths: 7,766 deaths and 330,218 injuries through April 17, 2021

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”…Joseph Goebbels

“More than 6,000 healthy children in the U.S. and Canada will be enrolled in the Moderna Covid-19 Vaccine Study for which the benefits to society are nil and the risks unknown.”...Citizen Wells

“it is my sincere hope that this public letter might stimulate FDA, Pfizer and Moderna leaders to think critically and quickly about the immunological danger the COVID-19 vaccine might pose to those persons naturally infected by SARS-CoV-2 — most especially to those infected who are recently convalescent, asymptomatic carriers, the elderly and frail or those with significant cardiovascular risk factors.”...Dr. Hooman Noorchashm

From the NIPH, Norwegian Institute of Public Health.

“”We now know significantly more about the association between the AstraZeneca vaccine and the rare but severe incidents with low platelet counts, blood clots and haemorrhages, than when Norway decided to pause use of the AstraZeneca-vaccine in March,” says Geir Bukholm, Director of the Division of Infection Control and Environmental Health at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. 

“Based on this knowledge, we come with a recommendation to remove the AstraZeneca vaccine from the Coronavirus Immunisation Programme in Norway,” says Bukholm. 

Bukholm points out that this has not been an easy recommendation to make. It has a direct consequence for when the risk groups can receive a coronavirus vaccine, with subsequent protection, while also having an impact on when it will be possible to lift infection control measures. “

“Calculations have been performed based on Norwegian data where the risk of dying from COVID-19 disease among the different age groups is compared with the risk of dying from the severe, but rare, condition with severe blood clots observed after AstraZeneca vaccination. 

“Since there are few people who die from COVID-19 in Norway, the risk of dying after vaccination with the AstraZeneca vaccine would be higher than the risk of dying from the disease, particularly for younger people,” says Bukholm. “

https://www.fhi.no/en/news/2021/astrazeneca-vaccine-removed-from-coronavirus-immunisation-programme-in-norw/

From Health Impact News.

“7,766 DEAD 330,218 Injuries: European Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 “Vaccines””

“The European database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, which also tracks reports of injuries and deaths following the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines.””

“This is public information funded by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and anyone can use the EudraVigilance system and verify this data.

Denmark and Norway have completely suspended use of the AstraZeneca experimental COVID-19 shots.

A statement issued by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health stated that the AstraZeneca COVID “vaccine” is more dangerous than COVID itself, especially for young people.”

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/7766-dead-330218-injuries-european-database-of-adverse-drug-reactions-for-covid-19-vaccines/

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

6 month old children in Covid vaccine trials, Experimenting on children is what Dr. Josef Mengele did in Nazi Germany, “protecting those around those children” who have been vaccinated???

6 month old children in Covid vaccine trials, Experimenting on children is what Dr. Josef Mengele did in Nazi Germany, “protecting those around those children” who have been vaccinated???

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”…Joseph Goebbels

“More than 6,000 healthy children in the U.S. and Canada will be enrolled in the Moderna Covid-19 Vaccine Study for which the benefits to society are nil and the risks unknown.”...Citizen Wells

“it is my sincere hope that this public letter might stimulate FDA, Pfizer and Moderna leaders to think critically and quickly about the immunological danger the COVID-19 vaccine might pose to those persons naturally infected by SARS-CoV-2 — most especially to those infected who are recently convalescent, asymptomatic carriers, the elderly and frail or those with significant cardiovascular risk factors.”...Dr. Hooman Noorchashm

We all say stupid things.

But the following argument for injecting babies with an experimental vaccine…

Did Nazi Germany’s Dr. Josef Mengele use the same excuse?

“We’re also going to be protecting those around those children, the teachers, the parents at home, the grandparents,” he said. “So that’s the unspoken benefit of this study.”

If those around them are being vaccinated, why do the babies need to be???

Their odds of dying from it are microscopic.

From ABC News.

“Children as young as 6 months old now in COVID-19 vaccine trials”

“As nearly 140 million American adults have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine and we inch closer to herd immunity, vaccine makers Pfizer and Moderna have moved on to the next phase of the fight against the virus: studying to see if the vaccine will be safe and effective for children.”

“Today, kids as young as 6 months old are taking part in trials for both companies’ vaccines with their parent’s consent. Dr. Zinaida Good, a research fellow at the Stanford cancer center, enrolled both her sons in Stanford Hospital’s Pfizer trial.

“We thought participating is a really good way to protect our kids,” she said. “So far, because this vaccine has been tested in a lot of teenagers and so many adults and it was shown [to be] very safe, we felt pretty comfortable to participate.”

Her son Soren is one of the youngest in Stanford Hospital’s Pfizer trial at only 7 months old. He received his first shot last week. Good says he’s doing well.”

““We’re also going to be protecting those around those children, the teachers, the parents at home, the grandparents,” he said. “So that’s the unspoken benefit of this study.””

Read more:

https://abcnews.go.com/US/children-young-months-now-covid-19-vaccine-trials/story?id=77353416

Protect the children.

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Arizona Maricopa audit update April 29, 2021 no TRO audit continues, “audit procedures may be made public”, “Dems using false fear-mongering failed to convince the judge”

Arizona Maricopa audit update April 29, 2021 no TRO audit continues, “audit procedures may be made public”, “Dems using false fear-mongering failed to convince the judge”

“Attorney Sidney Powell 42k ballots in Arizona with only Joe Biden selected on ballots”…Maria Bartiroma show

“The certification of Arizona’s FALSE results is unethical and knowingly participating in the corruption that has disenfranchised AZ voters,” …Jenna Ellis

“.@realDonaldTrump has made it abundantly clear he’s more interested in pandering to his neo-nazi base than being @POTUS for all Americans.”…Katie Hobbs Arizona Secretary of State

Dr. Kelli Ward.

“After 90+ minutes of AZ Court proceedings regarding the #FullForensicAudit – take aways: audit procedures may be made public, NO TRO, & Dems using false fear-mongering failed to convince the judge. #AmericasAudit continues! Video update later today via @azgop – tune in!”

Arizona GOP.

“BREAKING NEWS: America’s Audit continues. Listen to the latest update on audit of 2020 election in Maricopa County and court action. Only straight talk, audit update, and no fake news from Arizona GOP Chairwoman”

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

German judge rules no masks, no distance, no more tests for pupils, The masks are not only useless, they are also dangerous

German judge rules no masks, no distance, no more tests for pupils, The masks are not only useless, they are also dangerous

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”…Joseph Goebbels

“More than 6,000 healthy children in the U.S. and Canada will be enrolled in the Moderna Covid-19 Vaccine Study for which the benefits to society are nil and the risks unknown.”...Citizen Wells

“it is my sincere hope that this public letter might stimulate FDA, Pfizer and Moderna leaders to think critically and quickly about the immunological danger the COVID-19 vaccine might pose to those persons naturally infected by SARS-CoV-2 — most especially to those infected who are recently convalescent, asymptomatic carriers, the elderly and frail or those with significant cardiovascular risk factors.”...Dr. Hooman Noorchashm

From 2020 News.

“Sensational verdict from Weimar: no masks, no distance, no more tests for pupils

In summary proceedings (Ref.: 9 F 148/21), the Weimar Family Court ruled on 8 April 2021 prohibiting two Weimar schools with immediate effect from requiring pupils to wear mouth-nose coverings of any kind (especially “qualified” masks such as FFP2 masks); it further prohibited the schools from demanding compliance with AHA minimum distance-keeping; and also prohibited them from demanding that pupils undergo SARS-CoV-2 rapid tests. At the same time, the Court ruled that classroom instruction must be face-to-face [i.e. not remote]. Here is the full-text judgment (including three expert opinions).

This is the first time that evidence has been presented to a German court on the scientific reasonableness and necessity of the anti-Corona measures which have been imposed. Those heard as expert witnesses were the public health doctor Prof. Dr. med Ines Kappstein, the psychologist Prof. Dr. Christof Kuhbandner and the biologist Prof. Dr. rer. biol. hum. Ulrike Kämmerer. 

The legal proceedings are a child protection case pursuant to § 1666 paragraph 1 and 4 of the German Civil Code (BGB). It was initiated by a mother for her two sons, aged 14 and 8, at the Municipal Court – Family Division. She argued that her children were being physically, psychologically and educationally harmed without any benefit for the children or third parties. At the same time, there was violation of numerous rights of the children and their parents under the law, under the constitution and under international conventions.

Proceedings under section 1666 of the Civil Code can be initiated ex officio, either on the proposal of any person, or if, in the best interests of the child, the Court considers intervention to be necessary pursuant to §1697a of the Civil Code, in the absence of any such proposal.

After examining the factual and legal situation and evaluating the expert opinions, the Weimar Family Court has come to the conclusion that the measures – now prohibited – constituted a present danger to the children’s mental, physical and psychological well-being to such an extent that, if they continued without intervention, there was a high degree of certainty of considerable harm being inflicted.

The judge elaborated: “Such a danger is present here. For the children are not only endangered in their mental, physical and psychological well-being by the obligation to wear face masks during school hours, and to keep their distance from each other and from other persons, but they have already been harmed. At the same time, there is violation of numerous rights of the children and their parents under the law, the constitution and international conventions. This applies, in particular, to the right to free development of the personality and to physical integrity under Article 2 of the Basic Law, as well as to the right, pursuant to Article 6 of the Basic Law, to parental upbringing and care (also with regard to measures for healthcare and “objects” to be carried by children)….”

With his judgement, the judge confirmed the mother’s assessment: “The children are physically, psychologically and educationally harmed while their rights are violated without any benefit for the children themselves or third parties.”

According to the Court, the school administrators, teachers and others could not invoke the regional state [i.e. “Land”] regulations, on which the measures are based, because these are unconstitutional and therefore null & void. Reason: they violate the principle of proportionality, rooted in the constitutional rule of law (Articles 20, 28 of the Basic Law).

“According to this principle, also known as the prohibition of excess, the measures intended to achieve a legitimate purpose must be suitable, necessary and proportionate in a narrow sense – that is to say: when weighing their advantages and disadvantages. The measures at issue are not evidence-based, contrary to Section 1(2) IfSG, and are already unsuited to achieving the fundamentally legitimate purpose they pursue, namely to avoid overloading the health system or to reduce the incidence of infection with the SARS-CoV- 2 virus. In any case, however, they are, strictly speaking, disproportionate because the considerable disadvantages/collateral damage caused by them are not compensated for by any recognisable benefit for the children themselves or for third parties,” the judge said.

He made clear: “Nevertheless, it must be pointed out that it is not the parties involved who would have to justify the unconstitutionality of the encroachments on their rights, but, rather, the Free State of Thuringia, which with its State law provisions has encroached on the rights of the parties involved, would have to prove with the necessary scientific evidence that the measures it prescribes are suitable to achieve the intended purposes and, if so, that they are proportionate. So far, this has not been done in the remotest.”

1. THE LACK OF BENEFIT OF WEARING MASKS AND OBSERVING DISTANCE RULES FOR THE CHILDREN THEMSELVES AND THIRD PARTIES

With her assessment of the complete international data on masks the expert Professor Kappstein convinced the Court that the scientific evidence does not support the idea of the effectiveness of masks for healthy people in public.

The ruling states: “Likewise, ‘third-party protection’ and ‘unnoticed transmission’, which the RKI [Robert-Koch Institute] used to justify its ‘re-evaluation’, are not supported by scientific facts. Plausibility, mathematical estimates and subjective assessments in opinion pieces cannot replace population-based clinical epidemiological studies. Experimental studies on the filtering performance of masks and mathematical estimates are not suitable to prove effectiveness in real life. While international health authorities advocate the wearing of masks in public spaces, they also say that there is no evidence from scientific studies to support this. Indeed, all currently available scientific evidence suggests that masks have no effect on the incidence of infection. None of the publications that are cited as evidence for the effectiveness of masks in public spaces allow this conclusion. The same also applies to the so-called Jena Study, as the expert explains in detail in her report. This is because the Jena study – like the vast majority of other studies, a purely mathematical estimation or modelling study, based on theoretical assumptions without real contact tracing, and with authors from the field of macroeconomics without epidemiological knowledge – fails to take into account the decisive epidemiological circumstance, as explained in detail by the expert, that the infection levels had already declined significantly before the introduction of mandatory masks in Jena on 6 April 2020 (about three weeks later in the whole of Germany), and that there was no longer any relevant incidence of infection in Jena as early as the end of March 2020.” 

The masks are not only useless, they are also dangerous, rules the Court: “Every mask, as the expert explained, must, in order in principle to be effective, be worn correctly. Masks can become a contamination risk if they are touched. However, in the first place, people do not wear them properly; secondly, people often touch the masks with their hands. This can also be observed with politicians who are seen on television. The population was not instructed how to use masks properly, it was not explained how to wash their hands when out & about, or how to perform effective hand disinfection. Furthermore, it was not explained why hand hygiene is important and that one must be careful not to touch one’s eyes, nose and mouth with one’s hands. The population was virtually left alone with the masks. The risk of infection is not only not reduced by wearing the masks but increased by the incorrect handling of the mask. In her expert opinion, the expert witness sets this out in just as much detail as the fact that, and for what reasons, it is “unrealistic” to achieve the appropriate handling of masks by the population.””

Read more;

https://2020news.de/en/sensational-verdict-from-weimar-no-masks-no-distance-no-more-tests-for-pupils/

Protect the children.

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Mark Robinson NC Lt. Governor testimony House election integrity hearing, “Georgia law compared to Jim Crow” “absolutely preposterous”, “stop using me, as a black man, as your pawn.”

Mark Robinson NC Lt. Governor testimony House election integrity hearing, “Georgia law compared to Jim Crow” “absolutely preposterous”, “stop using me, as a black man, as your pawn.

“It’s time we modernize our election system in this country and stop playing all these silly games on race. And please, stop using me, as a black man, as your pawn. Yes, I said it-to push your agenda.”...NC Lt. Governor Mark Robinson

“The worst enemy that the Negro have is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros and calling himself a liberal”...Malcom X

“Democrats: party of slavery, secession, KKK and using blacks for their personal gain.”…Citizen Wells

“North Carolina Lieutenant Governor Mark Robinson
Written Testimony
Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties
Hearing: “Oversight of the Voting Rights Act: The Evolving Landscape of Voting
Discrimination”
Thank you Chairman Cohen and Ranking Member Johnson, and all of the members of the
committee for allowing me to speak today.
I am honored to sit before this Committee and testify before the most consequential deliberative
body in the world on such an important topic- a topic that hits close to home for me.
You see, I am the first black Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina, and I hail from Greensboro,
home of the Woolworths Diner Sit-ins, an epicenter of the civil rights movement.
I grew up poor as the 9th of 10 children in a home marred by alcoholism and sustained by a
mother’s faith in God. A woman who lived through Jim Crow, and witnessed first-hand the
incredible sacrifices made to ensure that black generations to come would have a voice in
government.
I know right now she is up in Heaven, very proud to see her son sitting here in this committee
hearing. But today, I’m not here to talk about myself, I’m here to talk about voter discrimination,
election integrity, and the role of the citizens and the government.
The title of this hearing is: “Oversight of the Voting Rights Act: The Evolving Landscape of
Voting Discrimination” and it certainly has throughout our nation’s history.
My people were put in the belly of ships, bound by chains, and endured the middle passage. My
people were whipped, beaten, and sold as property. In Reconstruction and throughout Jim Crow,
black people were intimidated, harassed, and even killed to keep them from having a voice in
government. Symbols like chains, nooses, and burnt crosses are not just symbols of death, they
are symbols of forced and coerced silence.
The sacrifices of our ancestors so I could have the opportunity to become the first black
lieutenant governor of my state, to see a black man sit in the White House, and for millions of us
to be leaders in business, athletics, and culture is incredible.

Now today we hear comparisons of Georgia law compared to Jim Crow, that black voices are
being silenced, and that black voices are being kept out.
How? By fear of a noose or chains? To be fired from work? To be ostracized by their
communities? No. A free ID to vote. Let me say that again, a free ID to vote.
How absolutely preposterous. Am I to believe that black Americans who have overcome the
atrocities of slavery, who were victorious in the civil rights movement, and who now sit in the
highest levels of government cannot figure out how to get a free ID to vote?
That we need to be coddled by politicians because they don’t think we can figure out how to
make our voices heard? Are you kidding me!?
The notion that black people must be protected from a Free ID to vote is not just insane, it’s
insulting.
And let me tell you something. It has nothing to do with justice and everything to do with power.
Just a few days ago the Vice President went and visited the very place I mentioned earlier, the
lunch counter in Woolworth’s, to see the place where history was changed. You know who
wasn’t invited to be there with her? My good friend and Civil Rights Icon Clarence Henderson.
The person whose picture is in history books, the person who actually sat in the chair and
endured to make sure that black voices were heard.
You might ask why that is so and I will tell you plainly. The goal of some individuals in
government is not to hear the voices of all black Americans, it is to hear the voices of those that
fit their narrative, and ultimately that help keep one group in power.
And that’s what this is all about, power.
Look at HR 1 that passed the House. It is despicable. The entire thing is designed to keep one
party in power and to ensure that they stay there indefinitely.
How do they plan to do that? By taking away the rights of the states given by the constitution to
hold elections, and to mandate a wish list by the federal government. Some of these items
include using government dollars to fund campaigns in order to give an advantage to one party,
mandating that felons are allowed to vote, including illegal immigrants on voter rolls, and of
course, banning states from having voter ID.
The last thing I want to say is this. Many people know I am a proponent of the 2nd amendment,
and I always will be. I believe that protecting the rights of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear
arms is vital, and that the first line of defense for doing so is identification. In the same way, I
believe that Voter ID is our first line of defense for protecting the integrity of our elections- and
that’s what this should be about, integrity, not power.”

Lt. Governor Robinson on questions.

“It’s time we modernize our election system in this country and stop playing all these silly games on race. And please, stop using me, as a black man, as your pawn. Yes, I said it-to push your agenda.”

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts

Dr. Harvey Risch exposes Dr. Fauci and medical establishment Covid-19 and vaccine narratives, 60% of new cases vaccinated, Herd immunity, Lock downs were “counterproductive”

Dr. Harvey Risch exposes Dr. Fauci and medical establishment Covid-19 and vaccine narratives, 60% of new cases vaccinated, Herd immunity, Lock downs were “counterproductive”

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”…Joseph Goebbels

“More than 6,000 healthy children in the U.S. and Canada will be enrolled in the Moderna Covid-19 Vaccine Study for which the benefits to society are nil and the risks unknown.”...Citizen Wells

“it is my sincere hope that this public letter might stimulate FDA, Pfizer and Moderna leaders to think critically and quickly about the immunological danger the COVID-19 vaccine might pose to those persons naturally infected by SARS-CoV-2 — most especially to those infected who are recently convalescent, asymptomatic carriers, the elderly and frail or those with significant cardiovascular risk factors.”...Dr. Hooman Noorchashm

Interview of Dr. Harvey Risch.

“Dr. Harvey Risch joined War Room to explain the vaccine “bait and switch” of public health officials, which are using a totally different standard for efficacy than they are letting on.

“What clinicians are telling me is more than half of the new covid cases that they’re seeing to treat is people who’ve been vaccinated,” Dr. Risch said. “They’ve estimated 60 percent of new patients they’ve been treating have been people who’ve been vaccinated.”

Dr. Risch said the medical establishment is not being honest about the vaccine’s effectiveness because they are pushing everyone into the vaccine pipeline.

“They’re afraid that if you say this vaccine is only 50 or 60 percent effective…then people aren’t going to take the vaccine,” Dr. Risch said.

Dr. Risch said it is clear Dr. Fauci has a different agenda than public health, because he won’t address honestly the herd immunity issue.”

““Half the states in the U.S have now have more than herd immunity,” he said. “They are coming down dramatically.”

Dr. Risch also said the lock downs were “counterproductive,” and only delayed their citizens from reaching herd immunity.

Dr. Fauci’s unwillingness to answer basic questions, like why can’t people who have already been vaccinated or already exposed to the virus not wear a mask, shows he has another agenda.

“[He’s] unwilling to actually say the word herd immunity,” Dr. Risch said. “I don’t understand why that is unless there is motivation for some other plan that is not the same as treating the pandemic. There’s nothing else that makes sense.” 

“There’s another agenda that is not apparent,” Dr. Risch said. “Look at the [World Health Organization] WHO. The WHO quietly removed from herd immunity the contribution of natural infection causing immunity. That produced an uproar in the scientific community, this violates at least 100 years of science.”

Dr. Risch said “political and financial” concerns have effected medical institutions, and are influencing the behavior of Dr. Fauci and others.”

Read more:

https://pandemic.warroom.org/2021/04/19/bombshell-60-of-new-covid-patients-are-vaccinated/

Dr. Harvey Risch Bio

Dr. Harvey Risch is Professor of Epidemiology in the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the Yale School of Public Health and Yale School of Medicine. Dr. Risch received his MD degree from the University of California San Diego and PhD from the University of Chicago. After serving as a postdoctoral fellow in epidemiology at the University of Washington, Dr. Risch was a faculty member in epidemiology and biostatistics at the University of Toronto before coming to Yale. Dr. Risch’s research interests are in the areas of cancer etiology, prevention and early diagnosis, and in epidemiologic methods. He is especially interested in the effects of reproductive factors, diet, genetic predisposition, histopathologic factors, occupational/environmental/medication exposures, infection and immune functioning in cancer etiology. His major research projects have included studies of ovarian cancer, pancreas cancer, lung cancer, bladder cancer, esophageal and stomach cancer, and of cancers related to usage of oral contraceptives and noncontraceptive estrogens. Dr. Risch is Associate Editor of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Editor of the International Journal of Cancer, and was for six years a Member of the Board of Editors, the American Journal of Epidemiology. Dr. Risch is an author of more than 330 original peer-reviewed research publications in the medical literature and those research papers have been cited by other scientific publications more than 40,000 times. Dr. Risch has an h-index of 93 and is a Member of the Connecticut Academy of Sciences and Engineering.”

https://publichealth.yale.edu/profile/harvey_risch/

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

https://parler.com/profile/Citizenwells/posts