General Flynn opposition to amicus brief of Attorney Gleeson, Attorney Powell filed June 17, 2020, “Flynn…singled out for a baseless, politically motivated investigation and prosecution”

General Flynn opposition to amicus brief of Attorney Gleeson, Attorney Powell filed June 17, 2020, “Flynn…singled out for a baseless, politically
motivated investigation and prosecution”

“Immediately after President Trump won election, opponents inaugurated what they call ‘The Resistance’ and they rallied around an explicit strategy of using every tool and maneuver to sabotage the functioning of the executive branch.” …Attorney General Barr

“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell October

“Under the separation of powers established by the Constitution, criminal charges are brought by the executive branch and adjudicated by the judiciary. Thus, any actual prosecution of Flynn under federal statutes for perjury would have to be brought by the Department of Justice.”…Attorney Leslie McAdoo Gordon

 

From the

GENERAL FLYNN’S BRIEF
IN OPPOSITION TO AMICUS

Filed June 17, 2020 by Attorney Sidney Powell.

“Counsel for General Michael Flynn files this brief to comply with this court’s
order of May 19, 2020. However, we hereby preserve all objections briefed in our
Petition for Writ of Mandamus and all prior filings in this court.1 This court exceeded its authority under the Constitution to solicit amici and to appoint an amicus. That chosen amicus has now engaged in a flagrant personal and partisan assault on General Flynn, Attorney General Barr, and the President of the United States.

This court’s friend simply ignores the indisputable, newly-produced evidence
proving that it is General Flynn who was singled out for a baseless, politically
motivated investigation and prosecution. ECF No. 198. In a rarely-mentioned text message the Government has never produced to General Flynn,2 FBI Agent Strzok reveals that [Bill] Priestap “doesn’t want Clapper giving CR cuts [transcripts on Crossfire Razor, the codename for the Flynn operation] to [the Obama] WH. All political, just shows our hand and potentially makes enemies.” (emphasis added). After Lisa Page’s reminder about including it already in the “doc on fri,” Strzok revealed the ultimate problem: “should we[?], particularly to the entirety of the lame duck usic [United States intelligence community] with partisan axes to grind.” (emphasis added).

The irony and sheer duplicity of Amicus’s accusations against the Justice
Department now—which is finally exposing the truth—is stunning. Amicus’s filing is a “wrap-up smear.” It is an affront to the Rule of Law and a raging insult to the citizens of this country who see the abject corruption in this assassination by political prosecution of General Flynn. This court exuviated any appearance of neutrality when it unlawfully appointed Amicus as its own adversary to make these scurrilous arguments.”

Read more:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.228.0_1.pdf

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

7 responses to “General Flynn opposition to amicus brief of Attorney Gleeson, Attorney Powell filed June 17, 2020, “Flynn…singled out for a baseless, politically motivated investigation and prosecution”

  1. “Under the separation of powers established by the Constitution, criminal charges are brought by the executive branch and adjudicated by the judiciary. Thus, any actual prosecution of Flynn under federal statutes for perjury would have to be brought by the Department of Justice.”

    Attorney Leslie McAdoo Gordon

  2. oldsailor88

    AND………
    ………..it was an official of the DOJ who ordered the court to dismiss the charges against General Flynn. The judge has tried to intercede in an order from his superiors. This makes him a ROGUE JUDGE, and can now legally be removed from the bench. This needs to happen, and the attorney who he hired needs to be charged, and brought before the DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION.

  3. oldsailor88

    AND NOW……
    ……we are witnessing an attempt of a black judge to make law. He cannot MAKE law. His job is to ENFORCE existing law. He seems to think that a hired PROXY can make law. The proxy cannot make law either.

  4. oldsailor88

    AS WE WATCH……
    ……….our law enforcement in America is being systematically destroyed by the LIBERAL LEFT LUNATICS. Policemen are walking away from their jobs because the political regimes of their cities are morally weak, and/or incompetent. Many black police officials have been found to be corrupt, and some have even been charged, and fired. A few are facing prosecution for having perpetrated a wide range of illegal acts while in uniform. Until black police officials begin to clean up their act the BS will more than likely continue. People everywhere are beginning to distrust their police departments. Some 911 operators are no longer sending officers to “in progress” criminal activity. Some of these 911 operators are also blacks.

  5. oldsailor88

    THE OFFICER…….
    ………..who shot Brooks was JUSTIFIED regardless of what the prosecutors are trying to say. The photography tells the essential story. He will be found NOT GUILTY. Then the officer needs to bring charges against the prosecutor for failing to follow established prosecutorial protocol. THESE TWISTED PROSECUTORS NEED TO BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE STATE SUPREME COURTS.

  6. AND…………
    ………….a picture is worth a thousand words. The black WORD TWISTERS cannot TWIST A PICTURE BEING VIEWED BY A JURY. Their own eyes will see what really happened. Officer Rolfe will be acquitted.

  7. “Amicus’s filing is a “wrap-up smear.” It is an affront to the Rule of Law and a raging insult to the citizens of this country who see the abject corruption in this assassination by political prosecution of General Flynn. This court exuviated any appearance of neutrality when it unlawfully appointed Amicus as its own adversary to make these scurrilous arguments.”

    Somebody has to ask the question. “Wherein does the Amicus Brief does the court appointed writer demonstrate proof of claims of against Gen. Flynn, AG Barr or POTUS?” Without such proof, it is a definitive “WRAP-UP SMEAR”. I go further with one other simple question. “Wherein does the author of the Amicus Brief address the violation of the 4th and 5th amendment Constitutional rights of the accused and address “Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” derived from such illegal actions, including but not limited, this ongoing proceeding?

    The “Amicus” provides no evidence that General Flynn Constitutional rights were not violated by the court. It implies, without evidence, that the AG and POTUS are corrupt. Finally, the court does NOTHING to protect the Constitutional rights of the Accused. You can’t fail more as a US Court and Justice that Sullivan already has.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s