Unequivocal proof FBI hiding Seth Rich records, Attorney Ty Clevenger letter to US Attorney John Durham, Criminal Complaint January 27, 2020

Unequivocal proof FBI hiding Seth Rich records, Attorney Ty Clevenger letter to US Attorney John Durham, Criminal Complaint January 27, 2020

And I’ve now found a witness who says the original 302 did in fact say that Flynn was honest with the agents.”...Attorney Sidney Powell

“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell October 23, 2019

“The FBI clearly has records pertaining to Seth Rich, and it has withheld those
records in bad faith.”…Attorney Ty Clevenger October 11, 2019

 

From Attorney Ty Clevenger January 27, 2020.

“We now have unequivocal proof that the FBI is hiding records about Seth Rich

The FBI is hiding documents about murdered Democratic National Committee employee Seth Rich, according to emails released last week, so this morning I requested a criminal investigation into the cover-up.

As most people outside of solitary confinement know, the whole “Russian collusion” investigation began with the premise that Russia hacked the DNC, but considerable evidence suggests that the DNC emails were downloaded by someone inside the DNC — liike Mr. Rich — and then provided to Wikileaks.

Rather than re-invent the wheel, I’ve copied and pasted my letter to U.S. Attorney John Durham, U.S. Attorney Richard Donoghue, and Inspector General Michael Horowitz:

Mr. Durham, Mr. Donoghue and Mr. Horowitz:

I wish to file a criminal complaint regarding false statements made by FBI Section Chief David M. Hardy in two affidavits [click here and here] filed in the FOIA case identified above [i.e.Ty Clevenger v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al., Civil Action No. 18-CV-01568]. I requested FBI records pertaining to Seth Rich, who allegedly was the source of Democratic National Committee emails published by Wikileaks in 2016 (rather than Russian hackers). In the affidavits (attached to the email version of this letter), Mr. Hardy testified that his office conducted a reasonable search, and it found no responsive records.

New evidence proves otherwise, and it appears that Mr. Hardy has perpetrated a fraud on the court. Judicial Watch recently published documents that it obtained in response to a FOIA request for communications between former FBI agent Peter Strzok and former FBI attorney Lisa Page (https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/JW-v-DOJ-Strzok-Page-Prod-16-00154.pdf), and I would direct your attention to pages 123-125. In those pages, you will find a heavily-redacted email discussion regarding Mr. Rich.  Note that the header on those emails is “Seth Rich.”

I defy Mr. Hardy to provide an innocent explanation for his office’s failure to produce these emails, and I suspect the misconduct reaches far beyond my specific FOIA request. Several facts are worth noting:

* Mr. Hardy touts the reasonableness of relying on the FBI’s Central Records System (“CRS”), but note that CRS does not search the FBI email system. That sort of half-baked, designed-to-fail search methodology would never be tolerated in litigation among private parties, yet it appears to be standard operating procedure at the FBI. And note that when I asked the FBI to search its email systems, it arbitrarily refused.

* Mr. Hardy’s staff purportedly searched for “Seth Conrad Rich” but failed to search for “Seth Rich,” another tactic designed to exclude responsive records.

* According to Mr. Hardy’s affidavit, the only records indexed by CRS are those that are manually designated by FBI personnel. Undoubtedly, FBI personnel know that they can immunize their email communications from FOIA requests simply by omitting the subject matter from the CRS, because Mr. Hardy will subsequently declare (1) that a CRS search is sufficient and (2) there is no need to conduct an email search.

I have previously written to Mr. Durham regarding evidence that the FBI was hiding information about Mr. Rich, and I have attached a December 13, 2019 order issued in Butowsky v. Folkenflik, Case No. 4:18-cv-00442-ALM-CMC (E.D. Tex.). Please see pages 23-29 in particular. Finally, I have attached an October 8, 2019 reply in the FOIA case, and it notes a previous occasion wherein Mr. Hardy provided inaccurate information to a court.”

 

Read more:

http://lawflog.com/?p=2282

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

18 responses to “Unequivocal proof FBI hiding Seth Rich records, Attorney Ty Clevenger letter to US Attorney John Durham, Criminal Complaint January 27, 2020

  1. “Why John Brennan, Peter Strzok and DOJ Needed Julian Assange Arrested”…The Conservative Treehouse November 3, 2019

  2. CW………..
    ………..as long as Julian Assange is LOCKED AWAY INCOMMUNICADO the eight BASTARDS have absolute protection. I believe that there is at least one other person on earth who Assange told everything to and provided incriminating documentation along with it. That person should now come forward and present the documents in a controlled forum which will PROVE beyond any shadow of doubt to the American public what the eight BASTARDS were, and still are actually up to. This is a lady who visited him in London for several hours. Perhaps she fears for her life if she lays it all out. (Seth Rich) being an example.!!!!

  3. AND TODAY………
    ……….A “jingle jaw” young female health professional was on Fox and friends this morning and they were discussing the Coronavirus. She said and I quote ” when it spreads world wide we don’t know how infectious it is.” HUGHHHHHHHHHH!!!! I have a news flash for that dizzy female, (if it spreads worldwide you would already KNOW it is infectious) simply from that fact by itself. Ohhhhhhhh wellllllllll !!!!

  4. A THOUGHT……….
    …………..there is a remote possibility that Bryant’s pilot may have flown into a flock of birds and suffered a flame out of at least one engine. I have driven the Coast highway from Portland Oregon to Los Angeles California, and it was nearly NEVER ENDING BIRDS……..ALL THE WAY.!!!!!

  5. AND TODAY……….
    ……….NOBODY IS REITERATING THE EXACT WORDING OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL LANGUAGE. EVERYTHING IS AN INTERPRETATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. THIS MAKES IT CASE LAW. IF THE CONSTITUTION WAS USED AS IT READS THERE WOULD BE NO LEGAL IMPEACHMENT GOING ON. CASE LAW IS WHAT IT IS, AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS WHAT IT IS…..YOU DO NOT INTERPRET CONSTITUTIONAL LAW…..YOU APPLY IT AS WRITTEN.
    …………IF COLONEL VINDMAN CANNOT UNDERSTAND THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE HE SHOULD NOT BE A COMMISSIONED OFFICER. HE SAYS THAT HE “THOUGHT” THERE WAS “SOMETHING WRONG” WITH THE TELEPHONE CALL BUT HE WAS UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHAT WAS WRONG. HE SHOULD BE ABLE AS A COMISSIONED OFFICER TO IDENTIFY MISTAKEN LANGUAGE IN A COMMUNICATION. SHOULD HE BE LEADING A DIVISION OF SOLDIERS THE LAST THING HE WOULD NEED TO DO IS MISREAD, OR MISUNDERSTAND A CRUCIAL ORDER FROM A SUPERIOR OFFICER. DOING SO COULD GET THE ENTIRE DIVISION WIPED OUT BY THE ENEMY. I PERSONALLY BELIEVE THAT VINDMAN SHOULD BE TRANSFERRED TO PENCIL PUSHING, WHICH HOPEFULLY MIGHT SHARPEN HIS COMPREHENSION OF ENGLISH.

  6. AND………
    ……… a few minutes ago Mr. Sekulow finished what I believe was a very well stated presentation of the facts surrounding the alleged impeachment of President Trump. I believe Trump will be acquitted.

  7. CitizenWells,

    I find the Seth Rich death deeply disturbing. I was unaware, until recently, that theee was another IT DNC related death (lucus I believe), that was ruled a suicide. Problem is the suicide was related to a rather complex drug combination, usually oral and IV drugs, in someone whose wife/kids, and family said didn’t use drugs at all. These deaths both occurred 1 day following roughly, 100k transfer to Crowdstrike. Odd, this would be slot of IT work and the timing is clearly odd. More odd, is that. Crowdstrike was already receiving payments from the DNC in early May of 2016, 19 days prior to the last email sent to Wikileaks.

    More odd, the review of the DNC server by the FBI was outsourced to Crowdstrike. No independent review was listed (separate company) and there are connections between the (trustworthy-sarcasm) FBI and Crowdstrike.

    Now, we have strong evidence that Seth Rich murder was known and ‘intercepted’ by “FBI” counterintelligence And DoJ lovebirds with an ‘insurance plan. Please note that neither of these two was ‘paid by the FBI’ one was DOJ and the others salary came from Langley.

    Yet, the media covers up all of it. We are told that the Russians hackers did it. Shockingly, we are told that Crowdstrikes Falcon platform is good at stopping Russian dancing bear hack, the very one they say infected the DNC computer, that they were paid to ?watchover?

    Do we actually have functional government that can do a real investigation? I am sure we don’t have functional media.

  8. Pete.
    Tried to keep the Seth Rich, Julian Assange story alive.
    It is crucial/central to the efforts to remove Trump & divert from Hillary Obama USDOJ corruption

  9. Hunter Biden Settles Paternity Case; Avoids Courtroom Confrontation Over Financial Info

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/deadbeat-dad-hunter-biden-settles-paternity-case-avoids-courtroom-confrontation-over

  10. CW……
    ………..settling the paternity case was obviously imperative to keep from being put under oath in a court room. This could be a telling morsel if explored properly.

  11. Pete…..
    ……….another notion protrudes from the settlement. This has a smell of being central in the Podesta activities as well. I personally believe that Podesta was the person who gave the order to take out Seth Rich.

  12. CW………
    ……….I too believe that it is essential that the Seth Rich issue be kept from being buried. Sooner or later the bullsh-t will be shoveled aside and the truth will prevail.

  13. Old sailor and citizenwells,

    I agree with both of you.
    Everything except that me thing. Democrats never have to pay for their crimes. Maximum penalty for conservatives, nothing for Democrats.

    Pete

  14. AND IF……….
    ………Trump is acquitted, a new impeachment action will begin immediately. The RAGING MANIACS will not stop their INSANE BULLSH-T until they are in PRISON. Congress is in DIRE need of CLEANSING. The MANIACS need to be expelled permanently. There is now a DIRE NECESSITY to bring Hunter Biden into CRIMINAL COURT, and put under oath.

  15. A THOUGHT………..
    ………….what if Coronavirus goes worldwide? How many people will die before the virus is finally defeated? The great PLAGUE epidemic in Europe wiped out thousands of people. The Coronavirus has the potential of killing many more people than did the EUROPEAN plague epidemic.

  16. AND NOW……………
    ……………the raging lunatics may be having second thoughts about subpoenaing Bolton. Even though he might have blabbed his own version of imagined events he is also looked upon as a possible liar. He more than likely has an axe to grind with respect to Trump. Therefore he might be inclined to exaggerate or lie outright. I personally do not trust Bolton.

  17. AND NOW………
    …………BUGGY LITTLE ATOM SNIFF made a bigger a$$ of himself today… LIE AFTER LIE. He has finally insulted the intelligence of the jury……..he will pay dearly. ATOM SNIFF’S EYEBALLS protrude radically whenever he is lying. He resembles Marty Feldman. har har

  18. “Several resurfaced clips concerning former national security adviser John Bolton reveal that Democrats, in particular Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said his 11th hour impeachment messiah had a “lack of credibility,” and was prone to “conspiracy theories” – and that Bolton thought there was nothing untoward about Trump’s interactions with Ukraine.”

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/flashback-schiff-says-john-bolton-has-lack-credibility-resurfaced-video-clips-ruin-11th

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s