Significance of McInnish V Chapman AL Supreme Court Decision, US Supreme Court ruling?, Justices Moore and Parker clarify state duties, Serious questions about Obama birth certificates

Significance of McInnish V Chapman AL Supreme Court Decision, US Supreme Court ruling?, Justices Moore and Parker clarify state duties, Serious questions
about Obama birth certificates

“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense,  to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells

“Moore said he’s seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.”…Judge Roy Moore interview by WND

“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the
constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no
rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be
inspected by him?”… Marbury versus Madison

Regardless of how this plays out, we have ensconced in writing, on the internet and available for other legal reference and quotation, a document with well
researched dissenting opinions by the AL Chief Justice Moore and Justice Parker regarding the duties and responsibilities of state election officials.
Perhaps just as important is the mention of documentation provided by the Arpaio Zullo investigation raising serious questions about Obama birth

Judge Parker wrote:

“(Case no. 1110665.) As I noted in my unpublished special concurrence to this Court’s order striking McInnish’s petition for a writ of mandamus: “McInnish
attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would
raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Obama that have been made

On March 6, 2012, the Secretary of State was served with McInnish’s petition for a writ of mandamus, including the attached documentation raising questions
about President Obama’s qualifications. That documentation served by McInnish on the Secretary of State was sufficient to put the Secretary of State on
notice and raise a duty to investigate the qualifications of President Obama before including him as a candidate on an Alabama election ballot.”

The McInnish V Chapman case should proceed to the US Supreme Court, the justices should rule and clarify the duties and roles of state election officials.
The poorly reasoned opinions of the consenting justices should be denigrated and the well reasoned, well written and constitutionally sound arguments of
Chief Justice Roy Moore should be upheld. This case, while highlighting eligibility deficiencies of Obama, focuses on the role of the AL Secretary of State,
and that is what the SCOTUS would focus on. The mootness aspect could also be addressed

Mootness could also be addressed by another case before the SCOTUS. Paige V State of Vermont. Central to this case is Obama’s natural born citizen status. If
this case is selected for full court review, we would expect a clarification of the definition of natural born citizen. This is mandatory as even many
constitutional scholars are divided on the definition.

We have in McInnish v Chapman, the most extensive and comprehensive delineation and definition of the duties of Alabama state election officials including
the Secretary of State. Many of us, including Citizen Wells, have addressed this adequately beginning in 2008. Though not rocket science, nor requiring a
legal degree to understand, it was beneficial to have a strong constitutional defender such as Chief Justice Moore to explain it with so much documentation.

To sum up the gist of Chief Justice Moore’s argument which is mine as well. Clearly the responsibility for presidential elections is that of the states up to
the certification of electoral college votes. The US Constitution requires that the president be a natural born citizen. The states are given some leeway in
procedural matters. The state laws and procedures vary considerably. There is no law stating that all presidential candidates must be preemptively
investigated to insure being qualified. However, since only a qualified candidate can legally be elected, it is imperative that the states take all
appropriate measures. The states in general have failed miserably at this. Some states have explicit laws and procedures to remedy a non qualified candidate.
Some have provisions for challenges. New Hampshire requires a natural born citizen certification.

From Justice Bolin:

“I concur with this Court’s no-opinion affirmance of this case. However, I write specially because I respectfully disagree with Chief Justice Moore’s dissent
to the extent that it concludes that the Secretary of State presently has an affirmative duty to investigate the qualifications of a candidate for President
of the United States of America before printing that candidate’s name on the general-election ballot in this State. I fully agree with the desired result;
however, I do not agree that Alabama presently has a defined means to obtain it.”

I read this with a certain amount of incredulity. After pondering it for a while I am wondering if this was intentional. A set up?

There are 2 simple steps that could have been and should have been taken. Immediately contact the AL Attorney General and request guidance. Get clarification
on the definition of natural born citizen and request a certified copy of the birth certificate. You know, one like I have a copy of, a copy of the original
certified by the governing office.

After comparing the ludicrous concuring opinions with the well reasoned, constitutionally sound opinion of Chief Justice Moore, one has to wonder if this was
a set up for the SCOTUS.

On the topic of mootness, I somewhat disagree with Chief Justice Moore as well others on remedies for removal of Obama if he is not qualified. Mootness only applies in the context of state duties since they did end with the electoral college certification. However, the clarification of state duties in AL and the other states is just as if not more important. Impeachment in the general since would apply but not in the presidential removal through congress. If Obama is not qualified he is not president. No ceremony or adulation by brainwashed school children effects that.

If Obama is not qualified, he should immediately be arrested and tried for treason.

Few are willing to state this, but it is the truth.

Of course with the Obama controlled USDOJ this would be tricky.

However, Eric Holder and others in the USDOJ were selected by Obama and perhaps they could be removed first.

Other states and state election officials should take notice. If Obama is proven to be ineligible, many of those officials have committed treason as well. Not to mention enablers like Nancy Pelosi, et al.

I and others contacted NC and other state election officials in 2008 as well as 2012 to warn them of probable Obama eligibility deficiencies. They were warned and have no excuse.

It is on the record now. From a state supreme court.

State election official duties.

Probable Obama eligibility deficiencies.

The results of the Arpaio Zullo investigation now take on more significance.

22 responses to “Significance of McInnish V Chapman AL Supreme Court Decision, US Supreme Court ruling?, Justices Moore and Parker clarify state duties, Serious questions about Obama birth certificates

  1. citizenwells

    “Hier stehe, ich kann nicht anders”

    Martin Luther

    “Here I stand; I can do none other so help me God.”

    Martin Luther King

  2. CW, we’ve all heard the mootness argument from a variety of legal sources. It doesn’t now and never has, held water; he was illegal when he was installed in 2008 and is still illegal in 2014.

    As long as barky’s in office, nothing is moot.

  3. Is this also part of Zero’s “vision”….and being “more flexible” for Putin? Of course this may be one contention with China too many for Putin.

    BREAKING: Mexico sees Russian gambit in Ukraine as chance for American land grab

    On Friday, in Geneva, Mexico signaled alarm at the treatment of its large Mexican minority in the United States, comparing American actions to prevent the use of Spanish to attempts in Ukraine and Estonia to prevent the use of Russian.

    While Mexico’s foreign policy has been generally benign toward the United States since hostilities in the Mexican-American War ended in 1848, the Latin-American country has been keeping a close eye on developing events in Ukraine’s Crimea peninsula.

    Russia has maintained that annexation of the Crimea peninsula is justified because it has the right to protect Russian speakers outside of Russia’s borders.

    Read more:

  4. “If Obama is not qualified, he should immediately be arrested and tried for treason”.

    Great article!

    Might want to add: Espionage, as another reason for his arrest.

  5. Observer | March 23, 2014 at 4:57 pm
    Everyone is noticing the weakness of the usurper.

  6. CW…

    When all the legal smoke settles, all the printer’s ink wells run dry, and all the courses of action are exhausted to remove this cancer from our society …

    One thing will stand out as a glaring reminder that our Constitution has failed us…no strike that……one thing will stand out as a glaring reminder of the failure of those elected politicians who are suppose to enforce our Constitution as it is written, and that is the simple fact that;

    No amount of whitewash or legal mumbo jumbo terminology can be applied to make a non-citizen foreign national acceptable as the president of the United States…..

    that is, of course, if our Constitution is still worth the paper it is printed on…..

    if it isn’t….then “we all just slaves and serfs and the grand plan hasn’t been explained to us yet”.

  7. SUEK…..You said,

    “As long as barky is still in office, nothing is moot”………

    AMEN !!!!…Well said.

  8. Congressman Demands a “Special Prosecutor” for Barack Obama and Lois Lerner

  9. citizenwells

    Thanks bob.
    Did not get enough sleep last night but wanted to get the article out.
    I believe many do not get the significance of the AL ruling.
    Have more to add & probably will.

  10. Once the Sheriff and Zullo information is released in a 1-2-3 punch, Congress and the Media will not be able to dodge this issue in my opinion.

  11. Mark Gillar (host of “Tea Party Power Hour”) is the voice-over in the Cold Case Posse’s Obama fraud video presentations.
    1:10 PM – 23 Mar 2014

    Mark Gillar: “There will be a lot of government employees and Obots seeing judges before this is over.”

  12. citizenwells | March 23, 2014 at 6:42 pm |

    Thanks bob.
    Did not get enough sleep last night but wanted to get the article out.
    I believe many do not get the significance of the AL ruling.
    Have more to add & probably will.
    It’s obvious that our Representatives don’t get the significance of this, or the natural born Citizen, deficiency either.

    This is a very serious matter, and needs to be addressed before a new precedent is established for POTUS eligibility!

  13. Bob Strauss……
    The precedent is ALREADY established….like it or not,and it is my belief that there will be a strong effort to utilise it…..not with regard to Soetoro, but for the purpose of overriding eligibility requirements. You can be assured the overeducated wordsmiths are working overtime in such efforts. Cruz ,Rubio,and all the others will be trying to use this precedent…….in my opinion you are right on the money Bob.

  14. ………but as long as the Constitution exists the eligibility requirement will exist. We need to concentrate on getting rid of the SLIMEY judges. We have far too many SNOT NOSED judges holding such a position of power. Sadly they have absolutely NO UNDERSTANDING of REALITY. Recently a Cincinatti Judge was indicted on federal charges. She had ordered two children taken away from their natural parents when such action was NOT JUSTIFIED. Her mindset is not that of an accomplished judge….rather one of a immature, and childish person with a severely twisted mentality.

  15. Gordo……..
    I pray that there will be a hell of a lot of LIBERAL perpetrators facing HANGING JUDGES. Such judges once made the rounds of his Circuit. He went from jurisdiction to jurisdiction in a horse drawn buggy. In those times hanging served two purposes, it was an expedient,and a deterrent.

  16. ……..hanging also helped keep the number of prisoners in state facilities, down to a minimum, thereby keeping cost of housing prisoners down as well.

  17. ……the Cincinnatti judge has a similar mindset as the Ohio poll worker who thought it was OK to vote for a candidate MULTIPLE TIMES. She is now enjoying an extended vacation in the SLAMMER. YEP,she earned it!

  18. Have a great day tomorrow! BYE BYE!

  19. My Twilight Years ~ Clint Eastwood

    As I enjoy my twilight years, I am often struck by the inevitability that the party must end. There will be a clear, cold morning when there isn’t any “more.” No more hugs, no more special moments to celebrate together, no more phone calls just to chat.

    It seems to me that one of the important things to do before that morning comes, is to let every one of your family and friends know that you care for them by finding simple ways to let them know your heartfelt beliefs and the guiding principles of your life so they can always say, “He was my friend, and I know where he stood.”

    So, just in case I’m gone tomorrow, please know this:

    I voted against that incompetent, lying, flip-flopping, insincere, double-talking, radical socialist, terrorist excusing, bleeding heart, narcissistic, scientific and economic moron currently in the White House!

    Participating in a gun buy-back program because you think that criminals have too many guns is like having yourself castrated because you think your neighbors have too many kids.



  20. NBC_Vic_Hern

    According to recent reports, that woman sentenced to 4 years for voter fraud in that Ohio case is out after about 8 months.
    And don’t you know, she was cheered, fested and asked to speak and a
    larger Democrat gathering………………………. isn’t that sweet of them.
    It lets everyone know exactly where they stand on voter fraud.

  21. Pingback: AL Supreme Court decision McInnish V Chapman likely taken to US Supreme Court, Attorney Larry Klayman, Chief Justice Roy Moore, A few good judges, Presidential candidate eligibility state function | Citizen WElls


    Clint Eastwood has a way of saying something that really sticks….under the craws of every liberal who reads it !…..thanks for the post Bob….I have put that into my ‘favorites”…….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s