Paige v. State of Vermont et al, US Supreme Court Writ of Certiorari, March 7, 2014, Update, Mario Apuzzo and counsel, Obama eligibility, Natural born citizen deficiency
“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense, to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells
“Moore said he’s seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.”…Judge Roy Moore interview by WND
“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the
constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no
rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be
inspected by him?”… Marbury versus Madison
From comment notification of H. Brooke Paige last night.
“Mario Apuzzo and Counsel Press filed a Writ of Certiorari with SCOTUS on behalf of H. Brooke Paige in the constitutional qualification ballot challenge case of Paige v. State of Vermont, et al. Wells will have more information and the Writ to post shortly.”
“Mario Apuzzo and Counsel Press filed our petition with SCOTUS today (Paige v. State of Vermont , et al). I would like to chat and more importantly forward our petition to you for your review.
All the Best, Brooke Paige”
H. Brooke Paige V State of Vermont SCOTUS Writ of Certiorari.
From Citizen Wells December 8, 2013.
“I received an update from H. Brooke Paige yesterday, December 7, 2013.
Mr. Paige filed a motion on November 15, 2013 for a reargument before the Vermont Supreme Court.
“2- The Appellant’s supporting brief request this court to consider and
favorably amend its decision of October 18, 2013 to more accurately depict
the record and more succintly annunciate its decision relating to the
following issues and reverse its decision as to mootness and rule on the
underlying issues as to law:
a – Correct the record to accurately documents the Appellant’s definition
of “natural born citizen” as consistently advanced and articulated
throughout the record.
b – Correct the record to accurately document the Plaintiff/Appellant’s
efforts to advance and expedite the action to a timely conclusion.
c – Fully delineate and document the Appellee’s efforts and actions to
delay and impair the advancement of this action both in the lower court and
before this Court creating a pall of “mootness” to despoil he (sic)
appellant’s effort to obtain a decision based on the merits of his case.
d – To reverse its decision that this case is mootness.
e – To render a decision on the definitional standard that should be
applied by the Vermont Courts as to the meaning of the Constitutional
Presidential Qualification of “natural born citizen” so as to remove the
confusion that currently exist for those involved in the Vermont Election
process at currently exist for those involved in the Vermont Election
From Citizen Wells October 19, 2013.
“I received the email from H. Brooke Paige last night.
“VT Sup Court ruled today. Interesting decision that will allow us to
proceed to SCOTUS.”
Instead of expediting this case the lower court and VT Supreme Court dragged their feet thus making their decisions after the election.
In essence, the case is moot because Obama is already president and cannot run again.”
From the Vermont Supreme Court response.
“¶ 9. Recognized principles of mootness apply to the present case because it no longer involves a live controversy. Plaintiff has no legally cognizable interest in the outcome. Barack Obama’s name was on the ballot, and he is now the President of the United States. President Obama is also unable to seek re-election.”
OBAMA IS NOT PRESIDENT IF HE IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.”
More to come soon.