AP reports Arpaio: Obama birth record ‘definitely fraudulent’, Yahoo News, Joshua A. Wisch special assistant to Hawaii attorney general lies, HI corruption continues

AP reports Arpaio: Obama birth record ‘definitely fraudulent’, Yahoo News, Joshua A. Wisch special assistant to Hawaii attorney general lies, HI corruption continues

“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense,  to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells

The WhiteHouse.com image has the following:

“I certify this is a true copy or abstract of the record on file in the Hawaii State Department of health.”… Alvin T. Onaki, Ph.D.

Abstract: “The term abstract is subject to different meanings, but in a legal sense, it refers to an abbreviated history of an official record.””

“There is an epidemic of messenger shooting in this country.”…Citizen Wells

From Yahoo News and the AP July 18, 2012.

“Arpaio: Obama birth record ‘definitely fraudulent'”

“PHOENIX (AP) — Investigators for an Arizona sheriff’s volunteer posse have declared that President Barack Obama’s birth certificate is definitely fraudulent.
Members of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s posse said in March that there was probable cause that Obama’s long-form birth certificate released by the White House in April 2011 was a computer-generated forgery.

Now, Arpaio says investigators are positive it’s fraudulent.

Mike Zullo, the posse’s chief investigator, said numeric codes on certain parts of the birth certificate indicate that those parts weren’t filled out, yet those sections asking for the race of Obama’s father and his field of work or study were completed.

Zullo said investigators previously didn’t know the meaning of codes but they were explained by a 95-year-old former state worker who signed the president’s birth certificate. Zullo said a writer who published a book about Obama’s birth certificate and was aiding investigators let them listen in on an interview he conducted of the former state worker.

The Obama campaign declined to comment on Arpaio’s allegations.

The Arizona Democratic Party said in a statement that Arpaio’s investigation is intended to draw attention away from problems within his own agency, such as hundreds of sex-crime cases that the sheriff’s office failed to adequately investigate over a three-year period.

So-called “birthers” maintain Obama is ineligible to be president because, they contend, he was born in Kenya.

Hawaii officials have repeatedly confirmed Obama’s citizenship, and state officials did again Tuesday.

“President Obama was born in Honolulu and his birth certificate is valid,” Joshua A. Wisch, a special assistant to Hawaii’s attorney general, said in a statement. “Regarding the latest allegations from a sheriff in Arizona, they are untrue, misinformed, and misconstrue Hawaii law.”

Wisch also said that “not only are Hawaii’s vital records some of the best managed, but they also have some of the strongest restrictions on access to prevent identity theft and fraud.”

Obama released a copy of his long-form birth certificate in an attempt to quell citizenship questions.

Courts have rebuffed lawsuits over the issue.”

http://news.yahoo.com/arpaio-obama-birth-record-definitely-fraudulent-010211250.html?_esi=1

The following statement is not applicable:

“Hawaii officials have repeatedly confirmed Obama’s citizenship, and state officials did again Tuesday.”

Obama’s citizenship is not being questioned. We will obviously let anyone be a citizen. His Natural Born Citizen status, a requirement for the presidency, is being questioned. In this case, his place of birth.

The following statements by Joshua A. Wisch, a special assistant to Hawaii’s attorney general, are a lie:

“President Obama was born in Honolulu and his birth certificate is valid,”

Mr. Wisch is not privy to the original document and not qualified to evaluate one.

“Regarding the latest allegations from a sheriff in Arizona, they are untrue, misinformed, and misconstrue Hawaii law.”

Outright lie! I listened to the news conference and Sheriff Joe Arpaio and lead investigator Mike Zullo basically regurgitated what had been reported here and elsewhere on the internet for years regarding Hawaii law and getting birth certificates. They did an excellent job of explaining it. We have known for quite a while that a foreign birth could be recorded as a Hawaiian birth with recordation and a birth certificate.

The AP ends with:

“Courts have rebuffed lawsuits over the issue.”

The issue being questioned is the image placed on WhiteHouse.gov purported to be Obama’s long form birth certificate. Neither this image or any other document represented as a birth certificate for Obama and offered by Obama or an attorney representing him has ever been scrutinized, evaluated or ruled on by any court of law.

Hawaii corruption?

“Hawaii Corruption Risk Report Card”

Public Access to Information….. D

Executive Accountability…………C+

Legislative Accountability………..C-

Judicial Accountability…………….D+

Ethics Enforcement Agencies…….C

http://www.stateintegrity.org/hawaii

43 responses to “AP reports Arpaio: Obama birth record ‘definitely fraudulent’, Yahoo News, Joshua A. Wisch special assistant to Hawaii attorney general lies, HI corruption continues

  1. Interested Bystander

    Good morning All,

    I would submit this:

    I believe that Romney SHOULD go to a podium with documents in hand.

    I believe those documents should be his College entrance papers and grades earned in College, and then tell the media it’s time for Obama to release HIS College documents.

    If Obama wants to play the tax document game which has NOTHING to do with his ability to Govern, then Romney can do the same.

    Besides didn’t Obama’s TREASURY SECRETARY have some sort of tax issue?

    But because he is a bleeding heart COMMIE PINKO, Geithner got a “pass”.

    But Romney won’t do it, he’s already been told by the “powers” that he is to fight “fair” while Obama is allowed to throw the kitchen sink at him.

    “Duck Mitt, here comes a frying pan”.

  2. citizenwells

    IB.
    Bingo!

  3. Interested Bystander

    Sorry CW, but I’m going to bring this over from the previous thread:

    Good morning all,

    IF you watch the video I linked yesterday at 8:48, it is CLEAR that the “9″ in box 9 is ONLY about RACE.

    Watch the video and at 31 seconds it shows the coding

    1 is white, 2 is Negro, 3 is Indian and so on until 9 is unknown or not stated (for parents only).

    To suggest that the coding is for an entire line is absurd.

    The “9″ in box 9 is explained by the video, but the “9″ in box 12b is NOT.

    And neither is any of the other coding on the document. The video only shows the chart for RACE coding.

    Not trying to be argumentative, but I’m right, just watch the video and read the header on the codes at 31 seconds.

    We NEED to know what the other codes mean.

    There appears to be 1s in boxes 2, 5b and 14 (1 means “White” according to the chart given at 31 seconds of the video, but it does NOT explain the 1 in boxes 2 or 5b).

    There appears to be 2s beside 7a, 7g and 11.

    I do not see any 3s or 4s.

    It appears to me to be a 5 beside box 6c.

    There appears to be a 6 beside box 6a

    I can’t see any 7s or 8s.

    There appears to be 9s in boxes 9 and 12b.

    And there appears to be Zeros or Os in boxes 12a, 17a and 17b.

    There also appears to be a W in box 16, or some scribbly line.

    There is NO Zero or O on the document at 31 seconds of the video.

    You can look for at the LFBC yourselves at:

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

    I agree with Zullo that box 9 should be blank according to the coding given, but it doesn’t explain the “9″ in box 12b, or any of the other coding on the LFBC.

    Why Zullo suggests that a “9″ in box 12b means it should have been blank, is NOT supported by the chart at 31 seconds in the video.

  4. Interested Bystander

    Here’s the video I am referencing:

  5. Interested Bystander

    Another revelation I’d like to point out is IF the coding is what Zullo suggests it is, then box 2 is coded with a “1”.

    1 indicates WHITE!!!

  6. Good Morning CW et. al.! There is a critical point most main stream media is neglecting to report!

    http://www.examiner.com/article/sheriff-joe-arpaio-offers-indisputable-proof-obama-s-birth-certificate-a-fake
    …The release did little to ease suspicions and speculation only grew as it was discovered that Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17.8 requires only that a person be an established resident of Hawaii, not necessarily a U.S. citizen, and pay taxes there for one year in order for an out-of-state or foreign-born person to register with an official Hawaii birth certificate…

  7. CW,

    Thanks for the new thread news. I was about to post this same conflicting report.

    In the Sheriffs Investigation, “Hawaii’s deputy attorney general, Jill T. Nagamine, confirm the state has a birth document on file for Obama. But she would not confirm on the record that the White House document matched what was on file with the Hawaii Department of Health.”

    But then in the media, “President Obama was born in Honolulu and his birth certificate is valid,” Joshua A. Wisch, a special assistant to Hawaii’s attorney general, said in a statement. “Regarding the latest allegations from a sheriff in Arizona, they are untrue, misinformed, and misconstrue Hawaii law.”

    So what we have is the AG’s office refusal to go on record nor sign a legal affidavit for conformation which they can be held accountable in a court of law, but will go straight to the media and make false statements without any legal repercussion. They know what they are doing.

  8. Interested Bystander

    Zach,

    I don’t want to burst any bubbles, but the law you are referencing was ENACTED in 1982.

    You have to go to 338-11 to start your journey as to what was required in 1961. 338-11 was enacted in 1949, then 338-12 (also 1949), 338-15 (1949), 338-16 (1949) and 338-17 (1949).

    So to be honest, ANYONE could have gotten a Hawaii Birth Certificate in 1961, whether they lived in Hawaii, or in the Antarctica. Just ask the First Chinese President:

    It really is that simple. There was NO residency requirement. NONE nada zippo zilch.

    Grannie could have went down to the HDoH or PHONED the birth in and a BC would have been generated, and the newspapers would have put the announcement in the paper.

    Look at the stautes, and keep in mind that the “L” after the words in the statute indicate when the statute was established, and the other dates are when it was amended.

    338-17.8 wasn’t passed until 1982, so it wasn’t the law back in 1961.

    Here’s the statutes for Hawaii. This is probably a couple years old, but it still has the laws established before 1961:

    http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0017_0008.htm

    I keep this in my favorites (I know I’m not “all there”)

  9. Good Morning All; I have to share a story with everyone….
    The past week I have been using the toll way and will have to use for the next month so I decided it would be beneficial to get an “I-Pass”…The only place that sells them is the Jewel grocery store which is out of the way but necessary…Then I had to register either by phone or their website, their website I found too difficult to use so I phoned them…The person from the government runned I-Pass started asking me a lot of questions I felt uncomfortable answering and felt unneccessary. After answering many of her questions, credit card number ( I already paid $52 for the divise and had $40 dollars credit), drivers licience number, plate number, email, home phone and cell number, I asked the person; WHY do you need all this information just for me to use the toll-way? I thought the purpose of the I-Pass was to make payment easier, more efficient and avoiding traffic jams…The government employee then informed me, ” the purpose of the I-Pass was to track me and my vehicle, not to make driving the toll way easier”…Hmmm something to think about…I then asked her if she knew WHO implimented the I-Pass program, she did not so I told her it was the now convicted and imprisoned Rod Blagojevich…Thanks but no thanks…

  10. That was a quote in examiner. I actually read the law to mean that an adult who met the requirements could get a birth certificate for their children.

  11. From WND:

    “State law indicates Hawaii only has information about the birth on file, but does not make representations about the truth or accuracy of that information. The investigators said a Hawaiian birth certificate therefore is worthless to prove a Hawaiian birth.”

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/watch-evidence-of-obama-document-fraud/?cat_orig=us

    Does this mean that a Hawaiian birth certificate is not, and cannot ever be, considered prima facie evidence?

  12. bob strauss

    Interested Bystander | July 18, 2012 at 8:37 am |

    Another revelation I’d like to point out is IF the coding is what Zullo
    suggests it is, then box 2 is coded with a “1″.

    1 indicates WHITE!!!
    ***********************************
    Why would they use a code for race in box 12b, if your theory is correct?

    Blank = 9, also means info not provided, if logic is applied

  13. IB 9:25 am),
    Your point is well taken and understood, but I don’t believe that was what Jach was referring to. Yesterday I brought up the same issue and here is
    my comment pulled over from the prior thread:

    This was revealed toward the end of the presser by Zullo:

    “It appears that in the case of Hawaii law, any person can obtain a birth certificate if any adult or their parents can prove that they resided in Hawaii for one year and paid taxes,” he said. “There is no requirement to show that the child itself was actually born in Hawaii or on U.S. soil.”

    It was at this point that Mike Zullo stated that this is a “national security issue.”
    The national security concerns raised by the investigation are based on Hawaii Revised Statute 338.17.8……..
    (snip)
    Because of this information all Hawaiian birth certificates are suspect. Zullo also believes this is in conflict with the Supreme Court’s ruling on SB1070, as does Arpaio, since state and federal law cannot be in conflict, though he tried to keep the focus on the document. (bold is my emphasis)

    Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/07/sheriff-joe-obama-birth-certificate-national-security-issue/#ixzz20wJ10Eg8
    ************************************
    IB, Zullo and Arpaio are very concerned about the above implying that presently Hawaii’s immigration laws are extremely lax, and THIS is a national security threat.

    I remember reading sometime ago that Mexicans could go to Hawaii and gain citizenship easily because of the laxness of Hawaii’s laws. AZ SB1070 was just recently ruled upon by SCOTUS.

  14. citizenwells

    onfire.
    If they continue to put “or abstract” at the bottom absolutely they are not proof of HI birth.

  15. citizenwells

    IB.
    Correct.
    Thanks

  16. citizenwells

    IB, feel free to bring anything over.
    You are helping.
    Thanks.

  17. ARE AMERICAN JOURNALISTS BIASED, INCOMPETENT OR BOTH?

    CONTACT THE NETWORKS AND ASK THEM WHY THEY ARE NOT REPORTING ON ARPAIO’S NEWS CONFERENCE REVEALING THAT THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS FRAUDULENT……

    ABC
    http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3271346&cat=ABCNews.com other

    CBS
    http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/feedback/fb_news_form.shtml?tag=ftr

    NBC
    http://www.nbc.com/contact/general/

    CNN
    http://www.cnn.com/feedback/

    FOX NEWS
    http://help.foxnews.com/entries/500736-where-can-i-send-story-questions-corrections-or-news-tips

  18. Interested Bystander | July 18, 2012 at 8:37 am |

    Another revelation I’d like to point out is IF the coding is what Zullo
    suggests it is, then box 2 is coded with a “1″.

    1 indicates WHITE!!!
    *********************************
    There must be a different coding system to explain the numbers on the document. Race codes wouldn’t work for the purpose of coding the document in it’s entirety. There must be another code list.

  19. With or without “abstract”, I would have to believe that if Hawaii law says that their certificates are not warrantied for accuracy, they are not evidence worthy.

    You see this same claim at most county recorders when filling out a fictitious business licence.

  20. MEDIA IGNORE SHERIFF JOE’S EVIDENCE, SHOOT MESSENGER

    After the press conference, Zullo told WND he was “disheartened” by the media’s personal attacks and their unwillingness to examine the evidence.
    “The case is closed on the birth certificate from our point of view, because we’ve gone the extra mile now,” he said.

    He pointed out that two computer experts, independently of each other, have performed over 600 tests each.
    “Both came to the same conclusion – that the document has been manipulated,” Zullo said.
    (snip)
    He said Congress has shown no interest in the case, but the sheriff is still pursuing that avenue.
    “We’ve been told from behind the scenes that nobody in Congress wants to touch it,” Zullo said.

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/media-ignore-sheriff-joes-evidence-shoot-messenger/

  21. they already have the naysayers out: I found this at the same site I viewed the presser yesterday.

    Birther author discounts Sheriff Arpaio’s claims on birth certificate

    Read more: http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/region_phoenix_metro/central_phoenix/birther-author-discounts-sheriffs-claims-on-birth-certificate#ixzz20z578vrd

    So now, one so-called expert can debunk the issue and the case is now closed.

  22. I guess this makes Obama a Felon !

    But he was a Felon when he did coke as he said in his book.

    Obama show your college grades from Columbia. What are you hiding ?

    Obama whereyour Law is License

  23. 37 minutes of video. link @ http://www.westernjournalism.com/

    Watch Joe Arpaio’s Press Conference
    July 17, 2012 By Daniel Noe

    Thank you to our friends at WND for live-streaming Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s latest press conference on Obama’s eligibility, which started today at 2:30 pm.

    Follow this link to watch: http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/sheriff-joe-arpaio-press-conference/

  24. Interested Bystander | July 18, 2012 at 9:25 am |
    ____________________________
    I think that abiding by either or no statutes Zullo was trying to impress upon the public/Congress that HI stands as a real national security risk….another “border state”….and to this day it is still so and then must be investigated….esp. when state laws cannot differ with federal laws.

  25. HonorFirst | July 18, 2012 at 10:25 am |
    they already have the naysayers out: I found this at the same site I viewed the presser yesterday.

    Birther author discounts Sheriff Arpaio’s claims on birth certificate
    ************************
    Honor, when that John Woodman first came out with his book discounting birthers, I remember that Citizen Wells had a special write-up on the subject. Wells debunked the debunker at the time. Now it seems that Woodman has to get his “sequel” in, which is a bunch of poppycock.

  26. Jonah | July 18, 2012 at 10:03 am |
    Jonah, thanks for the easy reference to news contact sites!

  27. bob strauss:
    There must be a different coding system to explain the numbers on the document. Race codes wouldn’t work for the purpose of coding the document in it’s entirety. There must be another code list.
    ______________________________
    Yeah, it has to be so. I think there was a specific chart shown for the race box because there are so many choices and they have to be the choices acceptable and clearly understood. But Ms. Lee explained that the number 9, as in the chart given for race, designated that applicant did not provide any info wherever it was noted…since they questioned her about wherever it was penciled in. There is no designation of same written in so there must be a general number coding for the other info boxes that checkers used. And the info/numbers on forms were checked twice.

  28. I think Zullo’s conclusion arrived at after the trip to HI was that no matter whatever or however or whenever information is placed on file in HI re: bc “facts”, nothing is ever authentically verified due to their laxity in requirements and differing applications to the law. Thus NO bc or even anything they note as “matching what is on file” there means anything about authentic facts to be accepted by such forms. Such forms cannot be used to verify anything. So when the media says he showed his bc and/or HI “verified” it, it’s still to be considered fictitious in comparison to authenticated established truth! What HI has been really hiding for decades is their own phony system used to harm our national security by intentionally opposing federal law.

  29. I don’t think Romney should present any records, etc. That would only show the public that he’s being controlled/manipulated by what they would consider then to be the stronger campaign. It’s merely a diversionary tactic and a rabbit hole.

    If he is just too tempted and can’t just ignore the taunts then he should bring a blown up copy of Zero’s bc with the written code numbers penciled in, explain that the numbers meant there was no info given on the original in those boxes and thus the record as been tampered with. And back that up with the fact that IF anything new had been later added then, according to HI’s own system, it would have had to have been stamped “altered” where it is not. Then put the Obama campaign on the defensive where they would have to keep talking about the bc, keeping it in front of the public’s eye, gradually perhaps creating more doubt. The stupid Romney campaign has now the very device to turn the “records” question around towards the Obama campaign while the public waits for more explanation. But they are too stupid how to use it….would prefer to cower and worry about whether or not they themselves should be forced to gradually spill out silly tax stuff….which instead would keep the public eye on the class warfare ploy. Romney has the evidence of real forgery/felony and won’t use it. Sigh! such little minds!

  30. What HI has been really hiding for decades is their own phony system used to harm our national security by intentionally opposing federal law.
    ******************************
    Observer, and what a conduit for the Usurper-in-Chief !

  31. Cabby,

    I believe the reason Hawaii was so relaxed on BC’s is so they could manipulate their citizenship numbers for additional congressional representatives.

  32. There are two side to every coin. Let’s look at each side.

    First, it matters little where the current president was born. By his own admission, his father was Barack Hussain Obama , senior, a CITIZEN OF KENYA.

    The Supreme Court of the United States has established in previous cases the requirements necessary to be a “natural-born citizen”. They have said it requires TWO parents who are citizens at the time of birth.

    The current resident of the White House DOES NOT meet that standard. In fact, his “claimed” father did not even hold a Green Card from INS. Barack senior was in America by the graces of a special educational program geared toward underdeveloped nations.

    Therefore, we now have a USURPER occupant in the White House.This has been accomplished in large part by an abetting media, a complacent Congress, and an abiding judicial system that has given this ILLEGAL a pass on everything. Otherwise he would still be pimping on the streets of South Chicago.

    He is a puppet and someone of a much higher power is pulling his strings. His birth certificate is very important to determine EXACTLY who this person is and his origin. His real BC will provide many missing links in this enigma.

    Now lets look at the other side of the coin.

    Many who blog on here (including myself) feel the goat herder from Kenya is not Obama’s REAL father. We are divided as to who has that distinction. Some of us say it is Frank Marshall Davis, the card carrying Communist, a black sexual pervert who lived in Hawaii during Obama’s younger year and was known to have taken nude pictures of Obama’s teenage mother..

    Other bloggers on here say he was the offspring of Malcome X, a black radical Muslim extremist, who was assassinated by other black extremist associated with the Black Panther movement of the 60’s.

    There is much to believe in both approaches to his real birth.

    If the people of America had been exposed to (aka) Obama’s past with either of the two latter background versions of his birth, he would NEVER have been elected to any public office.

    On the other hand, it has taken a lot of “tall tales” on the part of his handlers to stretch his Kenyan background into a reality. In this process, many palms have been greased, and many established laws have been ignored.

    Now we are getting to where the “rubber meets the road” ( as Cabby would say).

    If it is eventually proven that (aka) Obama is the real son of either Davis or Malcome X, Then a FRAUD HAS BEEN COMMITTED AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE . A fraud that demands judicial correction .A fraud that cannot be ignored or forgiven by a simple “I’m sorry”.

    Now the flip side of the coin. If (aka) Obama is eventually prove to be the REAL son of the Kenyan goat herder, as he as claimed for many years, then by solid evidence which is provable in any court of law, that will here the evidence ON MERIT, then he has still DEFRAUDED the American people by claiming an office to which he could NEVER be qualified.

    Either way you cut the pie, (aka) Obama is a FRAUD and with every passing day this becomes more apparent to the public .Eventually Congress and the courts will have to take legal action, otherwise the possibility of a civil war in America could occur.

    If those who can take action, but choose not because of political correctness ignores these warnings, then we must accept the fate that awaits us as a nation.

    What a hell of a story this will be for our grandchildren, and great grandchildren……if they get to hear the TRUTH.

    But like Bonaparte Nepoleon said ,” History is written by the winners “.

  33. Hawaii’s billboard motto as a newly accepted State:

    GOT KIDS?

  34. CW…can you take my last comment out of moderation…Thanks…

  35. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    BREAKING – MSNBC to give statement NOW on Sheriff Arpaio

  36. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Sorry folks – Roberts might have said that to tickle-up the ratings. I’ll keep you all posted if Arpaio is mentioned again.

  37. “NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT: OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE PROVEN FRAUDULENT”

    “ONE OF THE BIGGEST COVER-UPS IN U.S. POLITICAL HISTORY”

    Paul Joseph Watson
    Prison Planet.com
    Wednesday, July 18, 2012

    ===> “Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s cold case posse has confirmed that […] Barack Obama’s birth certificate is “definitely fraudulent,” prompting the media and political establishment to launch a frenzied spin campaign in an effort to deflect attention from the astounding new evidence uncovered by the investigation.” “However, none of the criticism of the investigation has dared to address the facts because they cannot be shot down. No matter what spin the media and political establishment attempt to put on this, the facts cannot be denied. […] Obama’s birth certificate betrays innumerable instances clearly indicating that the document has been tampered with in an effort to manufacture the myth that Obama was born in the United States. The manifestly logical conclusion that he was not creates an urgent national security threat and represents one of the biggest cover-ups in U.S. political history.” <===

    Continue Reading The Entire Article Here:

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/national-security-threat-obamas-birth-certificate-proven-fraudulent.html

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  38. NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT: OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE PROVEN DEFINITELY FRAUDULENT

    “ONE OF THE BIGGEST COVER-UPS IN U.S. POLITICAL HISTORY”

    Paul Joseph Watson
    Prison Planet.com
    Wednesday, July 18, 2012

    “Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s cold case posse has confirmed that […] Barack Obama’s birth certificate is “definitely fraudulent,” prompting the media and political establishment to launch a frenzied spin campaign in an effort to deflect attention from the astounding new evidence uncovered by the investigation.”

    “However, none of the criticism of the investigation has dared to address the facts because they cannot be shot down. No matter what spin the media and political establishment attempt to put on this, the facts cannot be denied.”

    […]

    “Obama’s birth certificate betrays innumerable instances clearly indicating that the document has been tampered with in an effort to manufacture the myth that Obama was born in the United States.”

    “The manifestly logical conclusion that he was not creates an urgent national security threat and represents one of the biggest cover-ups in U.S. political history.”

    Continue Reading The Entire Article Here:

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/national-security-threat-obamas-birth-certificate-proven-fraudulent.html

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

  39. PRAVDA covered Arpaio’s news conference. The USA is a laughing stock.

  40. boy o boy o boy, whenever a story on the fake certificate comes out the OBOTS come out in droves with their inane comments like “this BS again” or “this is a dead issue”, etc etc etc. IT REALLY HITS A NERVE because they KNOW bottom line that OBAMA is a FAKE and they can not dispute ANY of the evidence. Then the rest of real American public starts posting blowing the OBOTS away. It is pretty evident the gov paid obot trolls are paid off and tipped off to comment early. These stories are getting 3000 , 4000, 5000 + comments. That tells you that the MAJORITY of AMeRICANS are finally getting the true story.

  41. barky WAS and IS illegitimate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s