Kerchner v Obama update, November 6, 2010, US Supreme Court petition, Respondents Waive the Right to Respond

Kerchner v Obama update, November 6, 2010, US Supreme Court petition, Respondents Waive the Right to Respond

From Charles Kerchner, lead plaintiff in Kerchner v Obama.

“For Immediate Release – 6 November 2010

Activity in Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al case at the U.S. Supreme Court — Respondents Waive the Right to Respond to the Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court for the Kerchner et al v Obama et al Lawsuit
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/11/respondents-waive-right-to-respond-to.html

To read the Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court filed on 30 Sep 2010 see this link:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38506403/Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-filed-with-the-U-S-Supreme-Court-for-Kerchner-v-Obama-Congress

For More Information contact:
Mario Apuzzo, Esq., Jamesburg, New Jersey
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
Tel: 732-521-1900, Fax: 732-521-3906
Email: apuzzo@erols.com

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Pennsylvania  USA
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####”

73 responses to “Kerchner v Obama update, November 6, 2010, US Supreme Court petition, Respondents Waive the Right to Respond

  1. “The Respondents waive their right to respond.” What does that really, really mean? Let me see. I have a right to respond in court to A, B or C but I refuse because it is in my best interest or it will only continue to befuddle the plaintive or it is simply beneath me to acknowledge the complaint or it is another legal dirty trick to stall, obfuscate, and practice taqiya?

    I need more information to better under stand the byzantine legal hoops and obstacles. Can law really be that complicated?

  2. Please make the time to watch these videos!!!!Share them,pass them on!!

  3. Re: Writ. Mr Apuzzo has done a great job. I am concerned that the issue of standing can be abused by the courts for political expediency. If the justices feel Kaercher is not the case they would prefer to adjudicate, they will just drop it. Perhaps they would consider a case brought by a State or group of States, or at a minimum by McCain or by several sitting Congressmen. While I support the request for a writ, my guess is that SCOTUS is too timid to take this on after the flashback of Bush v. Gore.

  4. Rosemary Woodhouse

    GB- I’ve only watched the Ventura videos thus far, but wanted to say thanks for posting them. They are the most succinct, accurate depiction I’ve seen. Jesse Ventura- go figure! 🙂

  5. usapatriots-shout | November 6, 2010 at 3:59 pm | “The Respondents waive their right to respond.” What does that really, really mean? Let me see. I have a right to respond in court to A, B or C but I refuse because it is in my best interest or it will only continue to befuddle the plaintive or it is simply beneath me to acknowledge the complaint or it is another legal dirty trick to stall, obfuscate, and practice taqiya?

    I need more information to better under stand the byzantine legal hoops and obstacles. Can law really be that complicated?

    ———————————————————————-

    When Defendants do not respond to Pleadings, it usually means that the Defendants’ attorneys are not concerned that the Plea will be granted.

    In this case, it indicates that none of the Defendants’ attorneys are concerned that the Writ of Certiorari will be granted; i.e., they doubt that SCOTUS will hear the case.

    Remember Apuzzo sued all of Congress, Dick Cheney, Pelosi and others.

    I am somewhat surprised that none bothered to respond to the Writ.

  6. A key witness in Blago trail busted for shoplifting at a home depot store Friday.

  7. LM @ 7:27 pm |
    The delude one thinks he King George IV? Must have missed the George III v/s George Washington history lesson.

  8. I would be cool if the New Congress Fired Bernanke from the Federal Reserve and hired Ron Paul to take his place. Put Ron Paul in charge of the Federal Reserve and tell him to clean up the Corruption there. Also, switch the Dollar back to the Gold Standard, and dump all Foreign Banks and allow American Banks (minus Freddy Mac, Fannie Mae, Bank of America, and CitiBank) to take over.

  9. Wow…the mainstream media is all over this story…yeah, right. Reid colludes with Harrah’s and the union.. Remember a few days before the election when they were lamenting a small McDonald’s Franchise for trying to influence it’s employees to vote Republican? Well check out this email from the Reid campaign and read the story.

    “According to the e-mail, which was first made public by National Review Online’s Elizabeth Crum, the Reid staffer pleaded with Marybel Batjer, Harrah’s vice president for government relations, to do everything possible to get the firm’s thousands of employees and their families in Nevada’s largest county to the polls to vote for the Senate majority leader, including putting a “headlock” on recalcitrant supervisors “to get them to follow through.” In response, Batjer instructed her fellow Harrah’s executives that they were to “do whatever we need to do to get the supervisors to know that there is NOTHING more important than to get employees out to vote. Waking up to a defeat of Harry Reid Nov 3rd will be devastating for our industry’s future.”Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Harry-Reid-should-not-be-above-the-law-1471102-106799933.html#ixzz14YoMk49f

  10. Rosemary Woodhouse,
    Your welcome!Please pass them on,Jesse puts alot out there.I rarely watch Jesse but this one show I did not want to miss.I wanted to share with everyone,it explains it all.The housing market incredible,he nailed that one,that explains why one of my friends are going through what they are with their mortgage.They are forcing foreclosure,made their payments,and still can make payments but the bank refuses them.Missapplied payments,missing payments which they have all documentation of all payments with canceled checks and bank statements showing proof.Put payments on someone elses loan,kept changing mortgage payment amounts on them which they are at a fixed rate, each year sometimes twice payments kept going up.Escrow fraud and the list goes on.They went to an attorney and found out through their accountant that they were actually 4 and a half months ahead on mortgage loan.You’ll never guess what bank it was!One of the banks that got bailout money!People gotta start waking up!

  11. You’ll never guess what bank it was!

    First guess…Citigroup..

    Second guess…B of A

  12. JJ,
    Yes!Right the first time Citimortgage,which is Citibank!Your good!

  13. GBAmerica…I finally learned via a video teaching the difference in oligarchy, monarchy, anarchy, democracy, and republic.

    I even taught my “leave-me-alone’ husband that we are not a democracy, but a republic and what each means…he gets it and the video was great in explaining each form of government.

    I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands….

  14. >>>Paxson | November 6, 2010 at 10:46 pm | Wow…the mainstream media is all over this story…yeah, right. Reid colludes with Harrah’s and the union.. Remember a few days before the election when they were lamenting a small McDonald’s Franchise for trying to influence it’s employees to vote Republican? Well check out this email from the Reid campaign and read the story.<<<

    The story will get legs. This will start further investigations and more stories. I suspected this scenerio, and figure it will be several more weeks like about the holiday break, before interest peaks.

    Pete

  15. Good Morning! Did you see this regarding the case?

    Nov 3 2010 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Western Center for Journalism.

    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-446.htm

  16. This is a new thread over at FreeRepublic. Keep the issue alive.
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2622993/posts

    Interesting: Pelosi is no longer second in line to default as POTUS. Boehner will be. (Vanity)
    11/07/11 | me

    Posted on Sunday, November 07, 2010 6:55:56 AM by Evil Slayer

    Would like to toss out an interesting scenario that could possibly take place. Now that Pelosi will be constitutionally ineligible to become POTUS should both Obama and Biden happen to be disqualified for unknown reasons, come January after Sen. John Boehner is sworn in as Speaker of the House, HE will be second in line for the job.

    In my opinion, if the Republicans who will be in charge of committees to push the question of Obama’s qualification to be POTUS succeed in exposing him as in violation of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution and SCOTUS rules he is unqualified, wouldn’t that move Boehner one step closer to the presidency?

    Yes, I know what you are thinking. Biden would step in immediately after Zero is removed (no impeachment necessary). But Biden would also be removed since he would be (in my opinion) an accessory to the crime.

    Once Boehner is sworn in, he will have the ability to not only clean house by removing all of Zero’s commie czars but it would be like January 2013 instead of 2011 come this January.

    I look forward to my fellow FReeper’s comments.

  17. Regarding the bump in private sector hiring this week:
    I wonder how much of it is related to 4billion being spent in the 2010 elections and how much is related to stores trying to make the Christmas season start even earlier this year?

  18. Commander Kerchner believes the waiver to repond to be in his favor.

    Check out the first link CW has provided and read the fourth comment. He explains it in the simplest terms.

  19. Boehner becoming second in line to be president after the speakership may have been what the Republicans have been waiting for before challenging The One, I’ve always believed.

    We’ll see in January, won’t we?

  20. TruthSeeker | November 7, 2010 at 9:16 am |

    I hope Commander Kerchner is right.

    However, I think it is much more likely that SCOTUS will accept a criminal case against bo rather than a civil case.

  21. Zach Jones | November 7, 2010 at 8:53 am | This is a new thread over at FreeRepublic. Keep the issue alive.
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2622993/posts

    ——————————————————

    What is to stop the dems from impeaching bo in the lame duck session and then convicting him in the Senate in 2011?

    Then biden could appoint a dem VP and then resign in exchange for a full pardon.

  22. FS – I don’t think there’s any possibly of an issue damaging to Obama coming to light until after the new members of Congress are sworn in. It may be that the eligibility issue will get a lot more attention regarding Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal.

    If the Supreme Courts grants the motion to file an amicus brief in Kerchner, I hope Lt. Col. Lakin’s team will move to delay his trial in Dec. to next year. Maybe they should also make motion to the SC to allow them to file an amicus brief.

  23. http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-what-no-one-told-you-about-the-supposedly-great-jobs-report-2010-11
    …With a really fantastic headline number coming from the Establishment Survey, we thought we’d take a closer look at the other side of the coin. The Household Survey showed the following today:

    • a decline of 330,000 in the number of people employed;
    • a decline of 254,000 in the labor force;
    • a decline in the employment-population ratio to 58.3% from 58.5% in September;
    • an increase of 462,000 in those not in the labor force; and
    • an increase of 76,000 in the number of people unemployed….

    Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-what-no-one-told-you-about-the-supposedly-great-jobs-report-2010-11#ixzz14bZo4uAK

  24. Plenty of criminality there for SCOTUS to choose from, eh, FS?

    I actually there’s a better chance in that regard for solid prosecution.

    I agree with you wholeheartedly.

  25. Good Morning CW and all.

    FreeSpeech,

    I agree with your comment yesterday pertaining to the Writ and the failure to respond by the defendants. It is my opinion that the DOJ is over-confident that the SCOTUS will simply not hear the case at all, therefore no reason to respond. Inside information and knowledge? Who knows.

    But it is highly unusual given the DOJ’s past, that they failed to stall for more time. Their prefered tactic. The DOJ could have asked for more time, and could have delayed their responce, as well as delayed the timeline from giving a responce, and didn’t? Again, I believe one of two things are in play here, either over-confident or simply know ahead of time. Of course, it wouldn’t be the first time the DOJ or Obama met in private with the SCOTUS. Nothing would surprise me at this point.

    Just saying.

  26. Zach Jones | November 7, 2010 at 9:48 am | FS – I don’t think there’s any possibly of an issue damaging to Obama coming to light until after the new members of Congress are sworn in.
    ——————–
    Why not?
    ———————————————-
    If the Supreme Courts grants the motion to file an amicus brief in Kerchner, I hope Lt. Col. Lakin’s team will move to delay his trial in Dec. to next year. Maybe they should also make motion to the SC to allow them to file an amicus brief.

    ————————————-
    ??? What difference does it make if an amicus is filed or not? How will an amicus in Kerchner get Col. Lakin’s case delayed? Just asking???

  27. …And yet I still support and have faith for the very best in the Commander’s case.

  28. TruthSeeker | November 7, 2010 at 10:08 am | Plenty of criminality there for SCOTUS to choose from, eh, FS?

    I actually there’s a better chance in that regard for solid prosecution.

    I agree with you wholeheartedly.
    ————————————————–

    TY. I too applaud all the Patriots who brought brought civil cases and brought the issue of bo’s ineligibility to light.

  29. Have you been reading these articles about interviews with a White House insider? This one has a recap.

    The Ulsterman Report: White House Insider Review
    http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/the-ulsterman-report-white-house-insider-review/

  30. Good morning Zach,

    Thanks for the link discussing Sen. Boehner and the line of succession after Pelosi steps down.

    I don’t agree from a personal opinion perspective, that any attempt of impeachment or removal, nor exposure of Obama/Soetoro will happen by the lead of the Republicans. It would be toxic and most likely backfire on the Republicans current tactics and strategy.

    What is the “Goal” for the Repiblican Party? It is to take over the House, the Senate, and the Presidency by 2012 with the least minimum risk to themselves and gain voter confidence in the republican party to lead the Nation.

    First, (again in my opinion) to Expose Obama as a fraud, would be to expose themselves as a willing participant in the fraud themselves, a risk they are not willing to take with the American voting public for 2012.

    Secondly, Obama is a better tool of advange to discourage voters in 2012 if they simply left him in office and could show his incompetence and link that to the Democrat party, a strategy sure to win the Senate, more seats in the house and the Presidency in 2012.

    Lastly, to remove obama, would be highly costly in 2012. Republicans know that even if removed, exposed, ect., that would mean a temp. Republican President such as Sen. Boehner. But that would be a disaster. They know no policy is going to quickly turn the economy around in 24 months. Unemployment will still be high. Federal Reserve issues will still be looming. Housing and banking problems will not be corrected that quickly, especially with a split Senate. Are they willing to risk loosing in 2012, by getting rid of Obama today? Hell no. Is it the right thing and constitutional duty too? Yes.

    But again, power and strategy come before the people and Constitution, and this is the problem.

  31. FS: Why not? Too many are complicit in the criminal activities. Hopefully, hearings will bring more information to the public. Hopefully, the media will need to start reporting on the issues. Hopefully, one of the new Secretaries of State will signal that they will do their jobs and force the media to discuss the real facts about the NBC issue.

    Regarding Kerchner: With the low public approval for Obama, with the result in the 2010 election, with the fact that Obama is leading the country to a socialist system, with the military’s awareness that Obama may not hold the Constitution in high regard, with the Court’s awareness that Obama will also try to make the Supreme Court of less importance in the future, with a signal that the Supreme Court may actually be interested in the issue, with the possibility that the outcome of the Kerchner case could be relevent to Lt. Col. Lakin’s motivation for refusing orders and in mitigation, it might be a reason for a trial to be delayed to allow time for the Kerchner case to run its course.

    It really depends on the mood of the Judge in the Lakin case. However, what would it hurt if she delayed to trial for a couple of months to keep from having to sentence Lakin and the outcome of Kerchner could effect sentencing analysis. It would be worth a shot. Also if Lakin would attempt to file an amicus brief, the Supreme Court would be made to look themselves in the mirror and realize that if they don’t address this issue they will have Lt. Col. Lakin’s innocent blood (career destruction, loss of liberty, etc.) on their hands.

    If a delay of Lakin’s trial were granted, the SC might take notice that the military is waiting. If an amicus brief is allowed to be filed, maybe the military judge would take notice that the SC is interested and grant a delay that would not do her any political damage. If either happens, it might increase the likelihood of the other happening.

    However, I believe that the deck is stacked in ways that I’m not aware.

  32. Okay I have to go. Take care and have a great day. Zach

  33. Free Speech

    Thank you for the insight regarding my lack of understanding of the meaning of why the defendants failed to respond.
    Dr. Kates View has a long and brilliant article written on the subject that offers a wide perspective on this issue. Her site is drkatesview.wordpress.com

    Zach Jones

    That is an interesting thought and even a plausible one if Obama is removed based upon usurpation. According to Dr. Edwin Vieira, Biden would automatically be disqualified to be in line for the presidency since he is the choice of a man not eligible to make those choices. Honestly, I could live with Boehner being president until the next elections. Finally our economy would begin to return.

  34. FS,

    Amen!

  35. Zach Jones | November 7, 2010 at 10:45 am |

    If the dems were smart, they would go ahead and impeach bo while they still have a majority. Then the articles of impeachment would already be defined for the dem Senate to convict bo and cut dem losses.

    For Col Lakin’s sake, I hope you are right, but I don’t see any way that Kerchner’s case will delay Col Lakin’s trial.

  36. SirWilliam | November 7, 2010 at 10:43 am |
    Are they willing to risk loosing in 2012, by getting rid of Obama today? Hell no. Is it the right thing and constitutional duty too? Yes.

    But again, power and strategy come before the people and Constitution, and this is the problem.
    ********************************
    Hi, Sir William – Your analysis is right on, in my opinion. Absolutely YES, the right thing to do would be to expose and remove, but the Repubs are looking at the long-range picture from a strategic viewpoint. Their mandate, they feel, is to stop the spending, create jobs, and stop the free fall into socialism. Another thing: In a few months – during 2011 – next year – the presidential candidates will begin to announce their plans.

    The thinking by the Repubs is that their legislators don’t want to do anything that would murky the waters for their candidates who are focusing on the big prize: the Presidency. After all, how much time do they have to do EVERYTHING?
    Expediency and pragmatism are the watchwords, as far as they are concerned. Imho, we had better get used to it.

  37. Another possibility is that biden and the dem cabinet will invoke the 25th Amendment and remove bo because of his mental illness and drug abuse.

    http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/the-ulsterman-report-white-house-insider-review/

  38. All 3 branches of Government are quilty of misprison. Prosecute every single one of them. Margie’s law.

  39. http://theintelhub.com/2010/10/15/wayne-madsen-white-house-in-crisis/

    In the case of President Obama, the senior firings are not happening during a single night but the recent involuntary sudden departures of the White House chief of staff and national security adviser, along with what WMR can confirm from multiple sources is a president who is suffering from Nixonian levels of paranoia, depression, and schizophrenia, has some top-level administration officials considering the first-ever invocation of Section 4 of the 25th Amendment — the involuntary removal of the president from office. The White House meltdown has the Washington political circuit buzzing under the surface.

  40. “Obama’s Eligibility – Congress Internal Memo Revealed”

    “Who originally requested this research and who was it given to in Congress? The research was completed in April, 2009, so the research on this issue was requested before that.

    What other internal memos might be found in an FOIA request to Congress? It is about time for all of this information to be exposed and Obama’s eligibility investigated. The question remains who are all of the people involved in this conspiracy and who will be the first to break down? Did those reading this memorandum believe they had done their duty and were protected because they relied upon the report? Was this report sent to others outside of Congress?”

    http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2010/11/07/obamas-eligibility-congresss-memo-revealed/

  41. Very good discussions about

    http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/natural-born-citizen-discussions-in-the-late-1800s/

    The Brooklyn Daily Eagle, February 15, 1891

    To the Editor of the Brooklyn Eagle

    My wife and I are Americans and go to London on a pleasure trip. While in London my wife has a child, a boy. Can he become the President of the United States and what nation does he claim? Signed L.G.M.

    Answer – Your boy, born in London, would be an American citizen, because a law enacted by congress makes him one, but he is not eligible to the presidency of the United States. The constitution of the United States provides that eligibility to the presidency makes it necessary for the person to have been a “natural born citizen.”

    The Brooklyn Daily Eagle, January 25, 1891

    To the Editor of the Brooklyn Eagle:

    My parents are both Germans and have resided in Germany all their lives, with the exception of four months which they spent visiting some friends in this city, when and where I was born. On their return to Hamburg, two months later, of course they took me with them, and there I have since lived. On the 21st of last October I was just 21 years old, when I landed in New York, and intend to make this country my home. Now what I want to know is: Have I the full privilege of a natural born citizen, or should I have to take out any papers? Would I be eligible to be President should I ever be nominated and elected? Signed Sturger.

    Answer: This correspondent will have to obtain his naturalization papers just the same as any other natural born German. He was born of German parents while they were on a visit to this country. They were not emigrants and they were not settled here in any sense. The boy born here under these circumstances is a German subject, until he declares his intention to become a citizen of the United States.

  42. Thanks GORDO.
    Will followup.

  43. http://www.zerohedge.com/article/department-labor-comes-begging-hilda-solis-asks-extension-emergency-unemployment-compensatio

    There’s more at the link.

    “Not even two full days have passed since the announcement of what will become the single biggest monetary stimulus/experiment in the history of the world (since anything that never ends is by definition “biggest”), and here come the fiscal aid panhandlers. In an email just sent out by the Derpatment of Labor, Hilda Solia has officially requested an extension of the EUC program which is expiring in November and which will leave 2 million unemployed Americans without insurance benefits after November (and 6 million by the end of next year). Obviously this plea for fiscal heroin will be granted: how else can the country that has now become a utopian experiment in socialist-fascist fusion, supposed to delude the world that 42 million Americans on food stamps are actually not going to benefit from Ben Bernake’s actions? And after all, if the DOL is denied, how else will the bankers defend themselves when 60 million cold and hungry Americans come knocking on their door, asking for a little of that $3+ trillion of Fed luvin’?”

  44. http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/one-piece-of-moderately-good-economic-news-and-14-pieces-of-bad-economic-news-that-are-so-horrifying-you-might-not-want-to-read-them-standing-up

    The more research that you do into our economic situation the more depressing it becomes. We are in big, big, big trouble. The following are 14 pieces of bad economic news that are so horrifying you might not want to read them standing up….

    #1 More than 42 million Americans were on food stamps during the month of August. That is a new all-time record, and that number is 17 percent higher than it was one year earlier. In fact, the number of Americans on food stamps is up more than 58 percent since August 2007.

    #2 The number of “persons not in the labor force” in the United States has set another new all-time record. The United States has not had such an extended bout of mass unemployment since the Great Depression. The “official” unemployment rate in the United States has been at nine and a half percent or above for 14 consecutive months.

    #3 More than 1000 people now live in the 200 miles of flood tunnels that exist under the city of Las Vegas. Once one of the most prosperous cities in the United States, Las Vegas is now little more than a shiny, glittering corpse that it rapidly decaying.

    #4 Poverty is absolutely exploding and it is hitting those who are the most vulnerable the hardest. According to one recent study, approximately 21 percent of all children in the United States are living below the poverty line in 2010.

    #5 In the past 60 days alone, the price of cotton is up 54%, the price of corn is up 29%, the price of soybeans is up 22%, the price of orange juice is up 17%, and the price of sugar is up 51%.

  45. An interview, with video and transcript at the link.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2010/11/5/new_600b_fed_stimulus_fuels_fears

    MICHAEL HUDSON: Well, the object of warfare is to take over a country’s land, raw materials and assets, and grab them. And in the past, that used to be done militarily by invading them. But today you can do it financially simply by creating credit, which is what the Federal Reserve has done. It’s created $600 billion. It hasn’t gone into the economy. The head of the Fed is known as “Helicopter Ben” because he talks about dropping money into the economy. But if you see helicopters, they’re probably not your friends. Don’t go out and wait for them to drop the money, because the money is all going electronically into the banks. And the Fed has said, we want to give the banks so much money that they will lend it out so you can begin to bid up prices on real estate again and pull the banks out of the real estate negative equity that it’s in. So the purpose, according to the Fed, is to raise the price of real estate, to inflate asset prices. But that’s not happening. The actual banks have lent less today than they did in 2007. So the money is going abroad. And it’s going abroad not really to buy foreign companies so much, but to speculate in currency.

  46. This is rich coming from the guy who will not show his papers to the American people who have a right to see them, and this is all over a social event-Obama is as hypocritical as they come-insane too. The good news is he is as insulting to these folks as well as the American people.
    http://www.repubx.com/
    Obama’s state department to Indian officials: Show us your papers (updated – US apologizes)
    by MiaX November 06, 2010 05:30
    Mr. Obama’s trip to India may not be the great diplomatic success that the administration was hoping for. Our friends in the world’s most populous democracy are getting steamed over the state department’s heavy handed tactics. High ranking officials from the state of Maharashtra were invited to an event at the Taj Mahal hotel with Mr. Obama, but were told that they would have to show their papers to get in. According to The Times of India:
    Miffed by the US consulate demanding personal details like birth date, nationality and passport number, Maharashtra’s top politicians and bureaucrats have decided to pay it back in the same currency. While the home minister and the home secretary have declined to attend an event graced by President Barack Obama, four others, including chief minister Ashok Chavan and deputy chief minister Chhagan Bhujbal, are mulling the same.
    “We are shocked over the tone of the invitation letter. (US consul general Paul) Folmsbee expects Chavan and Bhujbal to produce their identity cards before entering the venue. They have been asked to submit their details like date of birth, nationality, passport and PAN to the consulate,” said a senior official on condition of anonymity. “We feel this is no way to treat the chief minister of a state. Chavan and Bhujbal are undecided on whether to attend the event.”…..

  47. I wonder if the Dems and/or others are working another angle to take Obama down in an attempt to save the party. Again with the Oprah gay stories, working their way up/down depending on your view of outing Obama the gay/Muslim thing-with Rev. Wright’s Down Low Club/Man’s Country Chicago. I’m from Chicago this would not play well for many different reasons-the last of Obama support-gone-. Coming from Chicago is this some sort of crazy cabal of Gay Black people? that part I don’t know, but they are all associated with the South Side Cesspool of Corruption-very weird even for them. Oprah is some kind of media mogul too, could this by our press has rolled over and played dead?
    http://itsnews2them.blogspot.com/2010/10/comfy-shoes-alert-oprahs-gay-life.html
    Sunday, October 31, 2010
    “Oprah’s gay life exposed “

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s