Wiley S Drake, et al Alan Keyes v Obama appeal update, September 7, 2010, Obama motion to extend time to answer brief

Wiley S Drake, et al Alan Keyes v Obama appeal update, September 7, 2010, Obama motion to extend time to answer brief

From BirtherReport.com September 7, 2010.

“Just more proof that Obama & Gang are working hard to dismiss/quash Obama eligibility lawsuits. Well, in this case, filing an extension to drag it out a bit longer. Mr. Usurper, would it not be easier to just release the records these lawsuits seek? Not long ago you stated this; “The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.” …I agree 100%!!!

Text of the motion; APPELLEES’ MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWERING BRIEF

Appellee President Barack Obama and all other Appellees, through their counsel of record, the United States Attorney for the Central District of California, hereby respectfully move this Court for an order extending the time for thirty (30) days from the current due date of September 13, 2010, to and including October 13, 2010, for the Appellees to file their Answering Brief in this appeal. Undersigned counsel will be unable timely to complete the Answering Brief by its current due date of September 13, 2010. The reasons for the requested extension are set forth in the attached Declaration of Assistant United States Attorney David A. DeJute. This is the Appellees’ first request for an extension of time.

This motion is made pursuant to Rules 26(b) and 27 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Rule 31-2.2(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and is based upon the files and records in this case and on the attached declaration of Assistant United States Attorney David A. DeJute. This request is unopposed by Appellants Wiley S. Drake, et al. but is opposed (without explanation or reason) by Appellants Pamela Barnett, Captain, et al. – DATED: September 3, 2010

Read more:

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/09/obama-et-al-file-motion-for-extension.html

69 responses to “Wiley S Drake, et al Alan Keyes v Obama appeal update, September 7, 2010, Obama motion to extend time to answer brief

  1. http://pub47.bravenet.com/forum/static/show.php?usernum=3957401277&frmid=7844&msgid=862428&cp=1&cmd=show

    ADMINISTRATOR ….Sep 6, 2010 – 7:23AM

    Sorry OT, but this may affect all of us before long. It really scares me.

  2. JJ, I read the article you posted and went to bravenet to read what they posted, I can’t speak for La, but the damage that was done to crops in the Memphis area was traced to a fuel dump by a Fed-Ex plane. My neighbor is one that has already been reimbursed by Fed-Ex as her Crops are her method of income.

  3. JJ | September 7, 2010 at 5:44 pm |
    http://pub47.bravenet.com/forum/static/show.php?usernum=3957401277&frmid=7844&msgid=862428&cp=1&cmd=show

    =================================

    Thank you. The danger is very real.

    Video of People Poisoned by Corexit

  4. Toxic Rain—Hurricanes

  5. Joy | September 7, 2010 at 6:03 pm |
    I think you missed the administrator’s point entirely.
    He’s asking any residents to get blood tests now to assess the damage early and surely have it recorded for the future. That’s what I took from reading the article.
    Thanks.

  6. Free Speech | September 7, 2010 at 6:04 pm | JJ | September 7, 2010 at 5:44 pm |
    I know this carcinogen/Corexit/poisoning is OFF TOPIC—but why do I have the feeling now and for months this will touch us all one way or another??
    I will not eat shrimp–will not buy fish oil tablets I’ve been taking daily for years–and even pet food has fish in it!!!! I’m really pizzed!!! I feel for these residents, their health, their jobs, their children, their lives disrupted as though they are just little ants.

  7. They “treat me like a dog” was an impromptu complaint by Zero in Milwaukee

    Such an unusual expression in American political life. We treat dogs fairly well and sometimes better than our own kin. I wondered what this would mean to a muslim and found the link below:
    http://www.submission.org/pets/dogs2.html
    Interpreters of the Koran have (Hadith) have inculcated distain for women and dogs and consider them unworthy of much except death.
    So I can surmise that our President, steeped in Islam, saw this as a much more egregious wrong that would the typical American.

  8. Bill G | September 7, 2010 at 6:17 pm |

    http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/dogs.htm

    Muhammad made strange and harsh statements about dogs and these edicts affect dogs in a tragic way. His teachings may have come from cultural bias, Pagan concepts, or his own imagination, but wherever they came from they led to the cruel treatment of dogs.

    None of the statements regarding dogs are found in the Quran but they abound in the various collections of traditions (hadith). These traditions are a primary foundation of Islamic theology and are the basis of many Islamic laws. They render dogs as “impure” and worse. Per Muhammad’s orders most dogs were to be killed and all dogs of a specific color (black) had to be killed.

  9. JJ | September 7, 2010 at 6:16 pm |
    Free Speech | September 7, 2010 at 6:04 pm | JJ | September 7, 2010 at 5:44 pm |
    I know this carcinogen/Corexit/poisoning is OFF TOPIC—but why do I have the feeling now and for months this will touch us all one way or another??
    I will not eat shrimp–will not buy fish oil tablets I’ve been taking daily for years–and even pet food has fish in it!!!! I’m really pizzed!!! I feel for these residents, their health, their jobs, their children, their lives disrupted as though they are just little ants.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    The poisoning of the Gulf Residents by bo and his co-conspirators is one of the most diabolically heinous crimes in the history of mankind.

  10. Alex Jones calls for Indictment of BHO/BP

  11. There is no way thad allen or bp could have ordered the US Air Force to spray corexit on the Gulf without bo’s approval.

  12. Citizen Carlyle (FUBO)

    Free Speech | September 7, 2010 at 5:01 pm
    captainkip | September 7, 2010 at 12:47 pm
    What kind of moron would send a forged document to the entire Congress on purpose?
    ==========================================
    Perhaps an obot who wants to discredit “birthers?”
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Are you ACCUSING me of sending this document to congress? What a compliment. But, alas, no I didn’t do it. I think it is a brilliant attempt to educate and open their eyes. Who says this is forged? I of course don’t know for sure, but it has got to be a lot more authentic, at least in parts, than the oft referenced PROVEN FORGERY at factcheck.org. That thing doesn’t even pass the Smell Test. This one at least looks real.
    And YOU pick on ME for disrupting things and you don’t even challenge this obvious OBOT?
    I haven’t heard from you all morning, so I thought maybe CW had boxed your ears for “posting etiquette”, but since you are still here, let me show you how to do it. I have tried to tell you several times before, but maybe you need an example.

    Citizen Carlyle (FUBO) | September 1, 2010 at 2:53 pm
    [RMinNC says: No one in the media will touch the “pink elephant” in the room because they would lose their job.]
    That is why we have to lay off the “birther” [specifically NBC] business and focus on the National Security problems with having hidden information leading to blackmail. EVERYBODY can understand that.
    Citizen Carlyle (FUBO) | September 1, 2010 at 9:00 pm
    [RMinNC says: If a foreign born subject running our country isn’t the most important national security issue this nation faces, then please tell me what is?]
    YOU DO NOT KNOW THAT HE IS FOREIGN BORN. EVEN IF YOU THINK YOU KNOW FOR SURE, YOU DON’T COUNT. YOU ARE NOT THE DECIDER. THE DECIDERS BELIEVE HE WAS BORN IN HAWAII.
    [RMinNC says: Obama is the greatest threat to national security we have encountered since Benedict Arnold. His complete disregard for our Constitution is because he has gotten away with providing the true FACTS concerning his birth.]
    I “BELIEVE” THIS TO BE TRUE WITH ALL MY HEART, BUT I CAN’T “PROVE” IT.
    The problem with [NBCers] – you are at a dead end – nowhere to go. There is no current legally binding definition of NBC (most of US think we know what it means and can quote Vattel and all that, but that doesn’t impress the PTBs). And my thesis is that nobody will provide that clarity of definition as long as it harms The One. Very specifically I have said: “Zero will not ever be taken down on the NBC issue, per se”. It will have to be other things, alone or in combination.
    Citizen Carlyle (FUBO) | September 2, 2010 at 6:27 pm
    To the extent anybody important [i.e. PTB] cares, they will think that it is not so long, now, until 2012 and the electorate will take care of the problem. After all, nothing horrible has happened in two years, so another two years – not so bad. (Disclaimer – since FS and others cannot read – and I must baby feed them – This is NOT what I want or what I believe [I am telling what PTB thinks].)
    Citizen Carlyle (FUBO) | September 3, 2010 at 1:21 pm
    The Nail in Lakin’s Coffin [if the judge’s ruling is allowed to stand] … There are too many things bizarre or just plain wrong in this whole situation to get your head around. … I think one rises above the others as just totally destroying his case. … This would be the insistence by the judge that orders come from the Pentagon, not the CiC, … It totally derails Lakin’s case and totally removes Zero from the discussion. In fact: END OF DISCUSSION!
    Citizen Carlyle (FUBO) | September 5, 2010 at 7:30 pm
    … try to think like a PTB. Maybe we [PTBs] all “know” that Obama is questionable on strict interpretation of eligibility. But nothing horrible has happened. In fact, nothing even sort of bad has happened, and we [PTBs] don’t think it will. Sure Obama is an incapable, moron, street thug, but those all have to do with who he IS. That have nothing to do with eligibility. So, we [PTBs] have a choice – ignore the eligibility aspects and nothing bad happens – or out the b*st*rd and maybe (almost certainly?) all hell breaks loose. So, which do I [PTB] choose? Maybe we [PTBs] need to get rid of Obama (remember: “incapable moron thug”), but we [PTBs] need to focus on those critical things. Best of all is out force him out of office via the 2012 vote. Second best is to stick him with some crime like with Nixon. But outing him over “eligibility” is a lose/lose proposition.
    Citizen Carlyle (FUBO) | September 5, 2010 at 9:43 pm
    Let’s wear out PTB hat again: How is Obama being ineligible ruining the country? His being ineligible does not appear to have harmed the country in any way. After he is voted out in 2012, we can all breath a great sigh of relief and move on. We could even then pass stricter vetting legislation – either national or state or both. This would prevent any problems in the future. In the meantime nothing horrible is happening. But if I try to pin this on Obama, a number of horrible things are almost certainly to happen.
    Citizen Carlyle (FUBO) | September 5, 2010 at 9:52 pm
    No more theory, no more “this ought to work”, we cannot even rely on “constitution says I have a right to do this or that”. The leaders and decision makers give not a fig for that. The “birthers” [specifically NBCers] have been beat. They have finally been ground into the silly putty that is the “truthers”. You can’t win a war if you don’t recognize when a battle has been lost – and it is time to retreat and REGROUP [emphasis added]. This in no way says birthers are wrong. It simply says that “on that path lies defeat”
    Citizen Carlyle (FUBO) | September 7, 2010 at 2:41 pm
    [Referencing a recent American Thinker article summarizing several cases of egregious things done to or in the name of the constitution over the years.] As evil as Zero’s lack of eligibility is, it pales in comparison to most of these, and many other that could be listed going back to at least 1913. I have seen many of you state that if we don’t boot Zero on the basis of him being ineligible, then the constitution is destroyed – we are no longer a nation of laws – etc. That argument depends on the assumption that the constitution was just fine prior to Zero. That is a provably bad assumption.

    Man, this is beautiful and does true justice to my work. It just keeps getting better and better and building on itself. Oh, and for those of you who actually read and understand stuff in-context, isn’t the tone and flavor almost the exact opposite of what FS published – exact same quotes?
    I don’t believe people should be banned or censored for their opinions. But this level of flat out misrepresentation and malevolence is something for which I would permanently ban a poster. But – hey – that’s just me.

  13. Bill G | September 5, 2010 at 10:43 pm |

    Note to all those blogging here. CC is disrupting this discourse, for reasons I can only speculate. I chose to ignore all CC posts as disingenuous.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Ditto

  14. The criminal usurper wants to stay as long as he possibly can. He uses the DOJ as his personal lawyers illegally. Then it takes an extra month for them to write some stupid stuff about dismissing, lack of jurisdiction and no standing. What a crock.

  15. Paxson | September 6, 2010 at 2:32 pm |

    CC Fubo,

    “… There are plenty of ways to attack the criminality of this administration and ending with the “eligibility” prosecution is just as fine with me as leading with it. The bottom line is that it cannot be swept under the rug as the precedent will have been set and any globalist organization will be able to come into our country and “set up shop” to control us, as they have today as we speak.

    That being said, I think what troubles FS and others is that you refer to “birthers” as somebody else, like here…”The “birthers” have been beat. They have finally been ground into the silly putty”. We are all “birthers” here and you sound like a run of the mill RINO when you diminish what has, and will continue to, foist our country into a constitutional crisis… Obama, at the minimum, is not eligible due to the dual citizenship that he held at birth. There are many other scenarios from there, that we all know about and I’m not going to get into here. Sweeping it under the rug for fear of social unrest is garbage. If he isn’t eligible, which we know that he isn’t, then let the chips fall where the may for the sake of our children’s future.”
    =================================================
    Well Stated!

    cc fubo sets up a strawman issue by harping on the birther issue. Even if bo was born in Hawaii, he is not eligible according to the NBC qualifications because his father was not a US Citizen by his own admission. Furthermore, even if bo was born in US, he relinquished any US Citizenship when he was adopted by Lolo and became an Indonesian Citizen and there is no record of bo ever applying to reinstate US Citizen, probably because his original citizenship would have come under question in the application process.
    Furthermore, even if bo was to now disavow HBO Sr as his father for some US citizen like Frank, he would still be guilty of fraud in posting the COLB with BHO sr as his father.
    Furthermore, there is ample evidence of bo and his criminal co-conspirators crimes for an impeachment of bo.

    =================================================

    Bill G | September 6, 2010 at 4:24 pm |

    “Regarding NBC, several posting here provide disinformation. Definitions referring to blood and dirt go back to Vattel and our Founding. Most recently, Senate Resolution 511 received 99 votes saying NBC means two US citizen parents and born in the US. There is no ambiguity or uncertainty regarding the meaning of NBC. Misrepresentations like this, often repeated, mean it is safe for us to discount the source of disinformation.”
    ==============================================
    Yes, sources of such disinformation as cc fubo and his cheerleaders are noted and discounted.

    Also as noted yesterday, CW posted the line of succession for POTUS which mentioned eligibility at every level. NBC is clearly a parmount requirement for POTUS. The Congressional Record will show another clear intent that blood and dirt is an absolute requirement. The NBC definition is clear cut in both Judicial and congressional records.

  16. speedy | September 7, 2010 at 7:54 pm |
    The criminal usurper wants to stay as long as he possibly can. He uses the DOJ as his personal lawyers illegally. Then it takes an extra month for them to write some stupid stuff about dismissing, lack of jurisdiction and no standing. What a crock.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    bo is not going to leave until he is ordered by SCOTUS to be legally removed by US Marshalls.

    This is the future that awaits bo:

  17. Citizen Carlyle 7:26 PM
    You say,
    “I don’t believe people should be banned or censored for their opinions. But this level of flat out misrepresentation and malevolence is something for which I would permanently ban a poster. But – hey – that’s just me.”
    **************************************
    Misrepresentation and malevolence it certainly is. One good thing, however:
    In the course of the thread, we get to reread your hypotheses. All of these quotes that appear in such repetitive manner for unseemly purposes must be stored in tact for ready “reference”. (tsk, tsk)

  18. Citizen Carlyle (FUBO)

    Free Speech –

    None of your comments since 7:43 make any sense or refer, except obliquely, to anything I say. As far as your definitions of NBC, those are EVIDENCE, not DETERMINATIONS of a court. You can engage in wishful thinking all you want, but that is no way to get results.

    I have said over and over – especially in the last several days – and in the correctly quoted materials above – “In my opinion, Zero is not an NBC by any reasonable definition of the phrase”. But then I have gone on further an listed the problems that the PTBs and the regular people have with that.

    It is another case of false and revisionist teaching in the schools. You may WISH that had never happened but it did. So contrary to what you say, NOTHING IS CLEAR ABOUT ANYTHING. The fact that you or others have yourselves whipped up into a religious frenzy over this, is of no interest to the Decision Makers. They have already formed THEIR opinions. Their opinion is clearly a lesser of two evils sort of reasoning – in their minds – go ahead quote me out of context again – it is a clear case of unimaginable chaos vs. a minor technicality.

    NBC-type “birthers” – I pop your balloon – I make you cry – I’m sorry.

    Not-ever-American-type “birthers” – of which I count myself a member – godspeed – I wish you luck.

    Anybody who has a way to pry loose ALL the documents so we can see the complete depth and breadth of the depravity – I worship you and will follow you anywhere.

    I DON’T KNOW HOW I CAN BE MORE CLEAR.

  19. May I ask a stupid question? Many months ago I asked something about posting, etc., and a number of good souls came to my aid. May I prevail upon you again?

    Okay, here it is. Some of you are using bold or italics. Whenever I have tried to do that on my text/edit (Mac built-in word processor) and then copy and paste it over here, it automatically reverts to the regular font. Now I see that CW has listed some items at the bottom of the new comment section. Am I suppose to be able to utilize those some way? I have “clicked around” and nothing seems to happen. Could, or would someone clue me in if possible? If there is any bad behavior you are holding against me, please forgive! (If there is any one thing that characterizes computers, I would say,
    “Click, click….” LOL )

  20. Citizen Carlyle (FUBO)

    Free Speech | September 7, 2010 at 7:56 pm |

    ================================

    I forgot – I was going to add – it must be tiring to tilt all day at windmills of your own devising – none of which have much resemblance to what I say – and as just recently thoroughly proved – many are the direct opposite of what I say.

    When researching to see how bad you misrepresented me in your earlier detailed post, I was struck by the number of times I had placed a parenthetical statement next to what you quoted that in each case said something like “Hey Free Speech – because I have to spoon feed you – I am saying this is what the PTB think, not what I think”. And even with that disclaimer, you misquoted it anyway! Over and Over.

    The British have a very good word for people who play with themselves (ref: tilting at own windmills, above) – but even more interesting it’s usual everyday meaning is “a jerk, one who engages in egotistical and self-indulgent behaviour.” You are starting to become our own resident one of those.

    You are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts. (Interestingly, this is a barb we usually reserve for liberal weasels.) And you are certainly NOT entitled to mis-represent, or otherwise bend, spindle, or mutilate what I say.

  21. Citizen Carlyle (FUBO)

    PS – I used to honor you and defend you for being the point of the spear in the effort to be a patriot and a constitutionalist. Not anymore. You have more than pizzed away all that good will. I now thoroughly believe that you were not incarcerated for anything righteous, but for your MOUTH (or pencil, as the case may be). If they did not lock you up for slander or libel or both, then they should have.

  22. Citizen Carlyle (FUBO)

    Cabby – AZ | September 7, 2010 at 8:15 pm |

    =================================

    Sure, you have to put formatting codes into your text (see gray notes about HTML tags below the comment box). The formatting you have on your word processor is irrelevant.

    You have to use the little “angle brackets” you see in the aforementioned gray text – but I will use “parentheses” here as placeholders, otherwise, the blogging software would try to interpret the angle brackets as formatting codes and would totally mess up my explanation.

    Do it like this:

    (b)the text between these tags will be bold(/b)

    (i)the text between these tags will be italic(/i)

    (b)(i)the tags can be nested for bold italic(/i)(/b)

    (blockquote)
    the, presumably, more extensive text here
    will be indented and formatted as a quote.
    you can see examples in recent posts.
    (/blockquote)

  23. !?!! | September 7, 2010 at 8:17 pm |

    U R Welcome!

    Col Lakin is among the greatest of American Heros in my book . The actions of all involved in his prosecution is a DISGRACE to the Military.

    It DISGUSTS me when I see obots posts like the following:

    ====================================

    Citizen Carlyle
    (FUBO) | September 3, 2010 at 1:21 pm |

    “The Nail in Lakin’s Coffin… orders come from the Pentagon, not the CiC…

    That nails it. It totally derails Lakin’s case and totally removes Zero from the discussion. In fact: END OF DISCUSSION!”

  24. Citizen Carlyle (FUBO)

    Free Speech | September 7, 2010 at 8:44 pm |

    ===================================

    Are you in need of psychiatric treatment?

    1. I have never criticized LtC Lakin in any way. I too think he is a hero and I think he did what he could. More people should have such courage.

    2. I did not say that Lakin was WRONG. I said that he would loose his case against this corrupt judge.

    3. I further described the method of corruption by which she wins. She wins by “removing Zero from the equation”.

    I fail to understand how any of this is difficult to understand or would twist anyone’s underwear. Sheesh.

    It does not appear to me that you either read or think. You just spew venom. It must suck to be you.

  25. I was born in Ridgewood, NJ. My Dad was born in Manchester , England from Irish parents. My Mom was Canadian from Lituanian immigrants. I accept that I am not eligible to be President. My Dad was the most pro-constitutional man that you would have ever met in your life. The NBC clause is meant to protect our way of life from the animals who have different values. Now I personally have values that are congruent with our constitution, and the voters may like me, but why take the chance? I accept this. I can still run for Senate, like Hector Maldonado.

  26. found this downstairs and thought I’d re post up here.

    jbjd | September 7, 2010 at 9:02 pm |
    © 2010 jbjd

    A COUP, THROUGH and THROUGH (3 of 3) is the final installment in the 3-part series describing the fraud pulled off at the 2008 DNC Services Corporation Presidential Nominating Convention in order to ensure Barack Obama would receive the nomination so that his name would appear next to the D on the general election ballot. The groundwork for the present article, “The Coup at the Convention,” was laid in the first 2 (two) installments, A COUP, THROUGH and THROUGH (1 of 3); and A COUP, THROUGH and THROUGH (2 of 3). Trust me, if you understand what got us here, to the convention, then you are now at the same jumping off point as those people who were determined to steal the nomination. Yep; just like you, from here on in, they were winging it, too. Because something they hadn’t anticipated happened at the start of the convention which could have derailed their best laid plans to obtain the nomination. Indeed, as I wasn’t there, it is only in retrospect I can explain to you what I later realized is about to go down, notwithstanding as it turns out, I was responsible for what happened next….
    http://jbjd.org/2010/09/06/a-coup-through-and-through-3-of-3/

  27. Rosemary Woodhouse

    @ FreeSpeech- if only our SCOTUS had the- pardon the play on words- constitutional fortitude to do what they must. We are only ONE vote in favor of We, the People thanks to Obama’s stacking vis-a-vis Sotomeyor and Kagen. One vote, people! Wake up! If Obama is oustered, all he has done must be nullified- including- nay, most importantly, his SCOTUS appointments!

  28. How many of our troops lives are you willing to sacrifice to jihadis in order to pay for the book burning at the Dove Center on 9/11? This is the question Gen. Petraeus is essentially implying when he asks those who would satisfy their anger at the cost of troop security and the success of their mission in dangerous and remote territory half way around the world.
    ISNA has seized upon the rhetoric and tone of public discontent with the Park 51 Mosque and the scheduled book burning to engage in interfaith outreach to religious leaders of all denominations asking for peace and forbearance. It is difficult to gauge how truthful a dialogue can come out of ISNA’s gesture. This interfaith initiative is but an embryonic start to identify what unites all religions, what common values, standards, purpose and forms of expression are universally accepted as edifying and wholesome.
    http://www.cspan.org/Watch/Media/2010/09/07/HP/A/37816/Islamic+Society+of+North+America+News+Conference+on+US+Attitudes+Toward+Muslims.aspx
    Here is where some of the troubling aspects of their ‘religious’ ideology is clearly on display:
    “Four Pounds of Anthrax in a suitcase this big…9/ll will be small change in comparison,” Abdullah Fahd Abd Al Aziz Al-Nafisi instructs rapt listeners on how to wage resistance to the polytheists.
    http://www.tangle.com/view_video?viewkey=0861ff3eabea1ceb73e4
    Another good summary of ISNA’s conflicting actions and words:
    http://docstalk.blogspot.com/2010/07/isna-conference-again-features.html
    And, where will President Obama be on 9/11?
    He’s protecting the generals and JCOS at the Pentagon.
    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/obama-to-spend-911-at-pentagon-dobbs-president-heading-to-bunker/

  29. CC, thanks for the explanation. I had already figured out what the items mean, but my trouble is getting it to translate as such on the comment box. Clicking onto or doesn’t do a thing. What am I missing? I tried activating the comment box first, and then pointing to one of these between the tags – Nothing happens. Call me stupid or anything you like, just don’t call me late for dinner – Ha.

  30. Well, well, what do you know? I guess it doesn’t show up until the message is posted. Now it looks as though I “chose” a bold italic. Wow! The trouble is I’m not exactly what I did – clicked on those letters presumably. The funny thing there was no evidence that ANYTHING was happening.

  31. JJ, I merely stated a fact about Memphis and the crop damage done here because many still tie Memphis to the damage in the Gulf Coast. Test were run on the crops here and after the findings Fed=Ex came forward about the fuel dump and started settling claims. Yet it still is added to various post. Wasn’t trying to cause a problem, just think Memphis and crop damage should not be used in their post without knowing the real cause.

  32. CC, thanks SO very much! This is a test right now.

  33. Rosemary Woodhouse | September 7, 2010 at 9:49 pm |
    @ FreeSpeech- if only our SCOTUS had the- pardon the play on words- constitutional fortitude to do what they must. We are only ONE vote in favor of We, the People thanks to Obama’s stacking vis-a-vis Sotomeyor and Kagen. One vote, people! Wake up! If Obama is oustered, all he has done must be nullified- including- nay, most importantly, his SCOTUS appointments!

    =======================================

    AMEN! Every Law, every appointment must be nullified.

  34. Rosemary Woodhouse 9:49 PM
    You say,
    “We are only ONE vote in favor of We, the People thanks to Obama’s stacking vis-a-vis Sotomeyor and Kagen. One vote, people! Wake up!”
    *********************************
    Did the balance on the Court really change? Sotomayor and Kagan replaced very liberal judges. Now the next appointment WILL be EXTREMELY important. Justice Kennedy has said that he will stay on, and he has at times been the swing vote.

  35. OB says people talk to him like a dog. Yet this is the man who called tea party folks, tea baggers, knowing it is a vile term; he called Sarah Palin a pig, and regularly shows people his middle finger. Mr. Cool throws temper tantrums all the time. He’s probably one of the most immature presidents we’ve ever had, in my opinion.

  36. Lillibet | September 7, 2010 at 10:00 pm |

    And, where will President Obama be on 9/11?

    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/obama-to-spend-911-at-pentagon-dobbs-president-heading-to-bunker
    ======================================
    What a GUTLESS COWARD & TRAITOR, bo is hiding in a bunker at the Pentagon on 9/11.

  37. Prairie | September 7, 2010 at 9:55 pm |
    CC,
    GEEZE, can’t you give a compliment without prefacing it with an insult! Try this… “Helen, what a dignified, sincere apology and admission of misunderstanding.”
    =============================================

    AMEN!

  38. Obama knows plenty about tea bagging. Just ask Larry Sinclair.

  39. Citizen Carlyle 8:59 PM
    Your antagonist likes the attention. It makes him feel important.

  40. Free Speech | September 7, 2010 at 6:44 pm | There is no way thad allen or bp could have ordered the US Air Force to spray corexit on the Gulf without bo’s approval.
    I think you give this fraud too much credit–he is just a PUPPET WITH A TELEPROMPTER!!

  41. JUST TESTING
    Thanks, CC

  42. Helen,

    I thought I posted this earlier but I don’t see it.
    APOLOGY ACCEPTED.
    I, too am having problems with my site. The address is
    http://usapatriots-shout.com

    I also attempted to post a very good video but all the appeared is my name.

    “strange things are happening.”

  43. There is a reason why the founders determined that a person had to be born in our country (although exceptions for military families protecting our country on foreign soil should be the exception) from two parents who were both American citizens. If not, what would stop Osama Bin Laden from dropping an anchor baby in Arizona and then funding him all the way to the Presidency. It’s common sense. Obama is not eligible according to the intentions of our founding fathers.

  44. Citizen Carlyle (FUBO)

    Cabby – AZ | September 7, 2010 at 10:11 pm |

    =================================

    Yeah, you just type the stuff straight into your text. The gray note is just rudimentary instructions. Don’t click on any of that stuff. There is no way that I know of to preview you work. Some blogs have that feature, this one doesn’t. Just carefully do it and trust it will show up properly.

  45. Citizen Carlyle (FUBO)

    Lillibet | September 7, 2010 at 10:00 pm |

    How many of our troops lives are you willing to sacrifice to jihadis in order to pay for the book burning at the Dove Center on 9/11?

    ======================================

    I can’t imagine anyone asking that question during WWII. If we wanted to burn some swastikas, we just took and did it. Crikey. If we even ask that question, let alone answer it, they have won. That is the ESSENCE of asymetrical warfare. In a technology shoot-em-out we win. Their major weapon is intimidation.

    If they can intimidate us into molly coddling them, THEY WIN!

  46. Citizen Carlyle (FUBO)

    Free Speech | September 7, 2010 at 10:41 pm |

    Prairie | September 7, 2010 at 9:55 pm |
    CC,
    GEEZE, can’t you give a compliment without prefacing it with an insult! Try this… “Helen, what a dignified, sincere apology and admission of misunderstanding.”
    =============================================

    AMEN!
    ******************************************

    If I were paranoid, I would think that people TRY to misunderstand or twist what I say. It was a MULTIPLIER – it makes my compliment even stronger.

    Do you understand this better? “Wow, Helen, even I a frequent critic of yours – somone would might be predisposed to dump on you – am compelled to heap praise on your outburst of honest generosity”.

    GGRRRRRRRRRR.

  47. Citizen Carlyle (FUBO)

    Maybe I will leave off for the evening with a cautionary example. Here is what happens when you run roughshod with some exact words from a poster. Exact words, same order, everything. HE SAID IT.

    Free Speech | September 7, 2010 at 8:44 pm |

    Col Lakin is … a DISGRACE to the Military … it DISGUSTS me.

  48. Citizen Carlyle (FUBO)

    !?!! | September 7, 2010 at 10:21 pm |

    “The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it’s enactment, not merely from the date of the decision branding it.

    “No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” — 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177, late 2d, Sec 256

    ================================================

    WOW – who made THAT rule and when and why?

    If that were really true, we wouldn’t have to do much of anything the Federal Government tells us to do!

    I think a lot of people would end up in jail if they tried to follow that rule! I know I AM NOT going to be the guinea pig to try it first!!!!

  49. !?!! | September 7, 2010 at 8:17 pm |

    =====================================================

    Col Lakin is among the greatest of American Heros in my book . The actions of all involved in his prosecution is a DISGRACE to the Military.

    It DISGUSTS me when I see obots posts like the following:

    ====================================

    Citizen Carlyle (FUBO) | September 3, 2010 at 1:21 pm |

    “The Nail in Lakin’s Coffin… orders come from the Pentagon, not the CiC…

    That nails it. It totally derails Lakin’s case and totally removes Zero from the discussion. In fact: END OF DISCUSSION!”

  50. BARACK AND HILLARY: IDEOLOGICALLY IDENTICAL
    by Ben Barrack

    Both call Chicago home. Hillary was born there and Obama’s political career was launched there – in the home of Bill Ayers to be exact. Rodham became radicalized while at Wellesley College and was influenced heavily by the work of a Marxist / Maoist and leader of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), Carl Oglesby. SDS was also the group from which Bill Ayers split to form the Weather Underground.

    http://biggovernment.com/bbarrack/2010/09/06/barack-and-hillary-ideologically-identical/#more-163301

  51. Lillibet…I’m waiting for the first installment of your teaching segments of the Koran scripture and its anti-christian meaning in relation to our Bible scripture.
    CW should be able to give my email…

    I think this is the most brilliant strategy to test their ‘patience and tolerance’, ya think??

  52. Barack Hussein Obama is not eligible, at the minimum, because he is a dual citizen with Great Britain. The fact that the debate was squashed in our country tells us how low that we have sunk as a country. The COLB that he put forth is a forgery. No doubt about it. This forgery indicates to me that he is hiding other facts about his birth records. He became an Indonesian citizen. More than like got student aid as a foreign national. Got his funding to attend Harvard from the Saudi’s. Was raised by a communist……..How many more facts do we need?

  53. Citizen Carlyle (FUBO) | September 8, 2010 at 12:10 am |
    “If that were really true, we wouldn’t have to do much of anything the Federal Government tells us to do!”

    “I think a lot of people would end up in jail if they tried to follow that rule! I know I AM NOT going to be the guinea pig to try it first!!!!”
    ***************************************
    Here again, we are getting feedback from the sovereignty movement teaching. Having been around for many years, this interpretation has now sprung new legs.. It has been the foundation for the now fragmented Restore America Plan(s) and is entirely bogus in the minds of good constitutional scholars. YES, PEOPLE HAVE GONE TO JAIL in working these schemes. In case someone is curious, just google in “sovereignty movements” , or something similar. CC, please don’t be a guinea pig – others have already tried it. (wink)

  54. “No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” — 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177, late 2d, Sec 256

    The operative word here is ‘unconstitutional’..in who’s eyes??
    Here lies our dilemna…some say the fraud is NBC…some say he isn’t.

  55. JJ | September 8, 2010 at 12:49 am |
    The operative word here is ‘unconstitutional’..in who’s eyes??
    Here lies our dilemna…some say the fraud is NBC…some say he isn’t.
    ****************************************
    You make a good point!

  56. Tina | September 7, 2010 at 10:33 pm |
    “…..Mr. Cool throws temper tantrums all the time. He’s probably one of the most immature presidents we’ve ever had, in my opinion.”
    ********************************
    You were very charitable and respectful in your comment, “immature”. I agree with you entirely, but would probably go further and call him a really “low-life” and even that would be mild for Michelle,who knows these Chicago-style thugs like the back of her hand.

  57. “Real-time HTML Editor”

    http://htmledit.squarefree.com/
    ======================
    “Html Code Tester”

    http://www.draac.com/htmltester.html
    ======================
    “Preview Your HTML Code”

    http://www.makems.com/myspace-html-preview/index.html

  58. “They treat me like a dog”…moan, moan, moan… He’s a pussy and has delusions of grandeur…

  59. Barack Obama and William Ayers shared an office space right down the hall from each other. The press tried to make it seem like they barely knew each other. Then they wonder why we have no trust for Barack Hussein Obama.. He tries to hide facts that are so real that you have to wonder if he has lost his mind. My father worked for ITT and was in the building that the Weather Underground bombed days before. I am sure that my mental imprinting against the fraggot, B. Ayers, is solely from words that my father said to me when I was 6 years old. I would love the opportunity to confront that little pervert and put my size 13 up us little skinny arse…. But I digress.

  60. Good morning.

  61. CW – Is something going on with Larry Sinclair? I haven’t been able to watch his videos because of some internet provider issues (bandwidth restrictions with too many house guests) but it seems he has been having problems posting here.

    I had problems last month and it does appear that some wordpress settings have changed. Take good care and thank you for all your efforts. Zach

  62. Free Speech @ 10:35:
    Well, “Bunker” Obama never has any “skin” in the game, does he? He ignites a firestorm over his remarks about the GZ Mosque and now he’ll be hiding behind the generals.
    Meanwhile, free speech is going up against freedom of religion. CC was right; this is about national security. Or, to chose another word, Homeland Security. How is it that we were attacked on 9/11 by foreigners who carried out their plot to destroy lives and property with the cover of fraudulently obtained identification such as drivers’ license and posing as exchange students?
    Now, in the White House, we have a sitting President whose only proof of who he is is a HI COLB, a certification of birth, a document that could have been obtained by a child born on foreign soil and imported to America before the age of two.
    Some days, i actually think that the Dove World Outreach Center could strike a blow for security in the homeland, by switching their protest to draw attention to “Who is in the White House?” They could burn all the documents he hasn’t produced to prove his bona fides in that bonfire. Or, they could burn pieces of paper with the names of porkulus programs and their Congressional sponsors. Or, they could burn every news story of violence and hatred spawned by the religion which institutionalizes that violence and hatred, instead of burning the ko-rant. Rev. Jones could read each story out loud in gory detail spreading the facts far and wide about what that religion teaches its followers to do to their family members, fellow adherents, non-believers, etc.
    Rev. Jones, at the Dove Center has the world’s attention right now and Bunker Obama is going into a hole like Saddam Hussein. Bunker Hussein Obama, unfortunatley, is in charge of Homeland Security through his proxy, Ms. Even Drug Traffickers Have a Human Right to Invade Us Napolitano.

  63. Click to access PDPfactsheet_DLs_9-11&intel_reform.pdf

    9/11 Hijackers Drivers’ Licenses were all legal, not forged, but some were fraudulently obtained and some of them had overstayed their Visas.

  64. JJ @ 12:24 p.m.,
    This is not about me. It’s about you, or rather, its about all of us lifting up our voices in unison questioning how their teaching squares with the universal truths that have lifted the human race out of superstition and barbarism.
    Search the internet for their verses, I’ll try to provide a link at CW, and then ask a simple question about why that teaching or verse is something of value/reasonable/respectable/conscienable/valid/worth emulating, or just something which simply does not seem anything but a human rights violation/a crime/an act of barbarism/an outrage/a vile thing, etc. In the alternative, ask why a people would want to be held in bondage to spiritual darkness which teaches them to maim, murder, discriminate against other creatures of a common Creator.
    Whatever your beliefs, or faith, every reasonable human being knows what is right or wrong in their hearts and can recognize that bondage to false teaching/dogma contains no light for the human race.

  65. Citizen Carlyle (FUBO)

    Paxson | September 8, 2010 at 12:28 am |

    The fact that the debate was squashed in our country tells us how low that we have sunk as a country.

    ================================================

    Welcome to the LIGHT! This is exactly the point. THIS is the logjam we have to break. NONE of the discussions and questions about Zero should have been off the table. ALL were legitimate questions essential to providing information to the voters.

    A major reason the have an “eligibility question” at all is because the public was uninformed as to there was even a question. With an informed public, these things tend to take care of themselves. The public could have seen that Zero’s credentials don’t even pass the Smell Test.

    But the Smell Test (which is what a lot of posters here still want to use) is no longer operative. Now that he is installed, only very artfully prepared legal arcana can remove him. We win on the Smell Test, but the technicalities are not in our favor.

    I am ridiculed daily for my “weakness” on the NBC issue. I have not lost my belief. The Smell Test clearly accuses him. But the wheels have fallen off this bus. The same people you identify that “squashed the debate” have already permanently squashed this topic.

    You, me, all of us, can pizz in the wind if we want to, but all that happens is that you soil yourself. We need to pick a better bus. If we want to win. If we are satisfied with just sitting around and whining, then pushing NBC is as good as any as a way to do that.

    I WANNA WIN? WHO WANTS TO WIN?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s