Philip J Berg lawsuit, US Supreme Court, Obama not eligible, Supreme Court Justices, Berg appeal, Help defend the US Constitution

I just received the following email from Philip J Berg’s office. Mr. Berg’s
lawsuit is one of two lawsuits currently before the Supreme Court of the
United States. Both lawsuits state that Barack Obama is not eligible
to be president. Here is the email:

“November 13, 2008



We have received a lot of emails asking what you can do to be heard regarding the issues pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.  Although we cannot tell you to do anything, we can answer your questions and inform you what is available so you may be heard.


You as citizens can individually address letters to all the Court Justices and address your concerns regarding Mr. Obama’s eligibility to serve as the President of the United States according to the requirements of Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution.


United States Supreme Court

1 First Street NE

Washington DC 20543



The Supreme Court Justices are as follows:


Supreme Court Justice John Stevens

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia

Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy

Supreme Court Justice David Souter

Supreme Court Justice Thomas Clarence

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Ginsburg

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer

Supreme Court Justice Samual Alito





Assistant to Philip J. Berg



9 responses to “Philip J Berg lawsuit, US Supreme Court, Obama not eligible, Supreme Court Justices, Berg appeal, Help defend the US Constitution

  1. If you have ever sent an electronic communication, including but not limited to an e-mail, text message or instant message, that could suggest a conflict of interest or be a possible source of embarrassment to you, your family, or the President-elect if it were made public, please describe.”

    So asks question 13 of the questionnaire for potential top-ranking Obama administration officials.

    The mind reels.

    The seven-page, 63-question intrusive and extensive list of queries, first obtained by the New York Times and confirmed as legitimate by the Obama Transition Team, offers a revealing glimpse into both the Obama team’s determination not to repeat the mistakes of its predecessors (Any nanny issues? Any discriminatory club memberships?) as well as the new era on which Obama will lead (“Please provide the URL address of any Web sites that feature you in either a personal or professional capacity, e.g. Facebook, My Space, etc.”).

    Applicants are asked if they or any immediate family members own a gun, if they have ever been charged with sexual harassment or malpractice, if they have ever had any alimony or child support issues, “any writs of garnishment,” or any bankruptcy problems.

    Ever been investigated, arrested for, charged with, convicted of violating any law, regulation or ordinance? How about your spouse? Your child? (“You may exclude traffic offenses for which the fine was less than $50.”)

    Have you, your spouse, or any member of your immediate family ever worked with a financial, banking, insurance or mortgage institution currently the subject of federal government intervention as part of the financial meltdown? “This question includes but is not limited to, the following: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, and Washington Mutual.”

    What about gifts? “Other than from relatives, or from close and longstanding personal friends on occasions such as birthdays or seasonal holidays, have you or your spouse ever received a gift exceeding $50.00 in value? Please identify the donor, the value of the gift, the date received and the circumstances in which the gift was received.”

    Net worth, tax returns, loans, trusts, real estate. The questionnaire attempts to leave no stone unturned.

    Provide a copy of every book, article, column or publication you have authored, any speeches you have given, any testimony delivered, any resume you’ve issued.

    “Please list all aliases or ‘handles’ you have used to communicate on the Internet.”

    “If you keep or have ever kept a diary that contains anything that could suggest a conflict of interest or be a possible source of embarrassment to you, your family, or the President-Elect if it were made public, please describe.”

    And now this 62 questions to anyone applying to the Nobama Admin. He is the biggest Hypocrite

  2. The list of Supremes left off Chief Justice John Roberts and transposed Justice Clarence Thomas’ name.

  3. Pingback: America needs citizen involvement! « ZachJonesIsHome - Helping to Keep an Eye on the Larry Sinclair Allegations

  4. Domestic terrorist William Ayers, on his book tour in an effort to re-introduce jibberish he published in 2000, refreshed a page to make mention, his “family friend” Barack Obama. Our President Elect.

    Just think about that.

    Talk about CHANGE.

  5. In your contact information regarding Supreme Court Justices to write regarding Obama’s qualifications (or lack therof) Justice Clarence Thomas’s name is inverted. Please fix. Thank ou.

  6. The only hope that this country has for staying great is if the Supreme Court rules to uphold the United States Constitution in the matter of Berg vs. Obama, no matter what the outcome. It’s the right thing to do. The Constitution IS the thing!

  7. what is with the media blackout about obamas birth certificate? why are you not reporting on all the LAWSUITS filed agenst mr. obama? what is he hiding? it is our constitutional right to know. . but if this issuse is all everyone is talking about at my college and job also all over the web.. millions of people are bloging about it. why is it the media knows nothing? what is going on? have you been bought off? we deserve an answer dont we?

  8. The fact that a the original or a legal copy of Obama’s BC had to be scanned into a file for publication on a web page, can explain evidence many use to claim it’s a fake.

    Doesn’t an accuser have to have evidence to back up their claims? Why should I believe this Conservative US Supreme Court, would reject the Berg Lawsuit if Berg has the evidence?

    What does William Ayers have to do with this issue? In the event Ayers and Obama have some evil plot, do you really thing they would feed the conspiracy mill?

    Perhaps the corporate media has looked in depth at these allegations and, decided there is nothing to report other than on gossip. Corporations tend to fair better with Republicans in power. Am I to believe the corporate media would let a truthful item about Obama, that may keep the Republicans in power slide?

  9. is he eigaeor not

    is oboma a ntura born citizen not is he eegabe or not

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s