Philip J Berg has been interviewed by the Fox News Channel in New York. Mr. Berg discussed the interview, his lawsuit stating that Obama is not eligible to be president and the US Supreme Court with Jeff Schreiber. Here are some exerpts:
“I spoke with Philip Berg this afternoon as he sat in his office, awaiting a crew from Fox News Channel in New York. While interest in his lawsuit among those at Fox has been steadily mounting over the past few days and weeks, Berg does not know exactly in what capacity the end product of the taping will be used.
“At this point,” Berg said, “the nation just needs to know that Mr. Obama is not eligible to serve as president of the United States, that he has so far successfully hidden behind procedure, and that we could very well be headed toward a constitutional crisis unless this is addressed.”
And he is indeed working toward ensuring that the issue is addressed, Berg said, and has been spending the past few days preparing for his appeal to the United States Supreme Court, a move which could happen by the end of the week. This, of course, has caused him to shift other items to the proverbial back burner, including but not limited to the so-called Michelle Obama tapes purportedly possessed by editorial staff at African Press International.”
“In the unlikely event, though, that four of the nine Supreme Court Justices decide to hear the case, Berg will first have to establish that, contrary to the arguments put forth by Barack Obama and the DNC and the specifics of the decision rendered by the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick, he indeed has standing to sue. As I’ve pointed out in these pages before, the standing doctrine as it stands today does not bode well for Philip Berg.
To have standing, a plaintiff must satisfy a three-prong test. He or she must prove (1) injury in fact, (2) causation, and (3) redressibility — that they’ve sustained more than just general harm, that the harm can be traced to the conduct of the defendant, and that adjudication of the matter can provide a remedy to that harm. Berg’s biggest hurdle, so far, has been establishing injury in fact.”
“In the past, the United States Supreme Court has held that a plaintiff must have a “personal stake” in the matter being adjudicated. This, of course, is to ensure that the matter belongs before the court in the first place. More recently, however, the Court has paid greater attention to, and awarded standing for, plaintiffs who can show enough of an injury so as to provide something along the lines of a good contest among legal rivals.”
Read more here:
Help Philip J Berg defend the Constitution:
Citizen WElls 
CW:
I’m a pro Berg Guy; however his reference to the Michelle Obama tapes has got me a bit upset.
Either he has the tapes or he doesn’t have the tapes!
Why be so ambiguous, especially at the 11th hour.
Berg needs to be clear about the Michelle tapes and he need to do it soon.
Joe and all.
I will post about API , Berg and the tapes tomorrow.
Hello.
Joe, I share your frustrations. Last week, Berg claimed to have the video in foreign language. He was to have it translated/released. I say… get it done already!
Hi Citizen,
Its been awhile since I have commented here. But I read daily. Keep up the good work!
CW:
Thank You!
Berg’s only chance is that FOX airs the story that Obama is spending thousands of dollars in the courts to keep his records secret.
That might sway public opinon to force Obama to release his records.
I agree with Joe , leave the bogus API scam out of it.
CW
I’m going to talk about the elephant in the room.
While Berg deserves ALL THE CREDIT for working this hard… his credibility is not-ACE.
This is a problem if he comes out with this “tape”.
Vetting Berg is going to be as big as the story.
It will take too long.
Do not take this as me “jumping ship”… I am not.
This is so easy to resolve.
Why don’t the Republicans and like-minded Democrats in the House and Senate who do have “standing” just hold a big news conference and demand that Obama produce his original birth certificate?
The longer they wait – especially after the election – the less likely that Obama will be removed from public office.
For the life of me I cannot figure out why this is not being done already. Screw the msm and just have the Republican Congress demand this.
The press will cover their news conference and Obama will be forced to produce the evidence. But don’t do it right before the election because he will stall his way into office and good luck after that trying to get rid of him.
Am I the only crazy person or are there others that think the same?
http://www.redstate.com/diaries/dan_perrin/2008/oct/28/the-seven-reasons-mccain-palin-are-a-lock-to/
I happen to agree with this. Take a look and smile.
Thanks for keeping us up to date on all the media refuses to report. Though some of these stories may turn out to be smoke and mirrors, there are a couple stories on this blog that should have been covered in the MSM, if they were really interested in equal treatment of the candidates.
Sometimes you do need to step outside of the forest to see the trees.
Canada Free Press today stated that “Obama proclaimed his commitment to an egalitarian society; which in some circles is described as the holy grail of socialism—last
year on the U.S. Senate floor when he introduced the Citizenship Promotion Act, S. 795.”
The author supported that claim by quoting the Senator as telling his colleagues on March 7, 2007 the following:
“Let’s stop sending mixed messages.
Let’s work together and set immigration fees
at a level that are fair and consistent with our
commitment to being an open, democratic,
and egalitarian society.”
Did his colleagues believe those words?
Since as the piece points out, Americans haven’t
been told about this commitment on the campaign trail to the White House, you may catch the details here:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/5839
Is this déjà vu,………. thanks to Joe?
I think that if the Michelle tapes are realeased, there will be a phrase that will unhypnotize his supporters. Something has to wake them up.
“…Berg’s biggest hurdle, so far, has been establishing injury in fact.”
——
How about the defendant’s behavior has psychologically damaged Berg’s utmost patriotic trust to the Constitution of his country? The upholding of the Constitution will help Berg to regain his trust and psychological being.
What I’m seeing here is the beginning of Communism. If we don’t have ” Government of the people, for the people, by the people”, I guess we’re all screwed.
Apparently the Constitution means nothing, and our collective rights mean nothing. Obama’s rights somehow trump all of our rights?
Why can’t Chavez run for President. The fact that Obama’s name is in a database means nothing. His mother could have put it in there.
This is absurd he wasn’t checked out more thoroughly and WE are are having to try and do it.
Thanks for all this great information, Citizen Wells. Do you also have any update on the Sarah Obama tape?
Do you know when the API tapes will be revealed. Also, in regard to the LA Times tape, call the number/gal below and tell her America should hear the tapes!
This is how you contact the person who told Fox News that the LA Times isn’t interested in revisiting the video:
Nancy Sullivan
Executive Director, Communications
213-237-6160
nancy.sullivan@latimes.com
Don’t let up.
Regarding the issue of the Rashid Khalidi tape, Glen Beck held an interview with Andrew McCarthy on it.
Catch it here:
I promised an update on the API tapes and had an article written and ready to post. I have emailed API again and do not want to jump the gun. Their warnings to the American voters should be read.
While Philip Berg is appealing to the US Supreme Court, there are many more suits daily being added to have Obama prove his citizenship. Here’s my assessment of what is likely to happen: Obama may get elected before anything is done. One case, probably Berg’s, will be heard as an urgent matter a few weeks after the election, but well before inauguration on Jan 21(?). That means that once again we will have the court decide on the President. A decision against Obama will cause riots resulting in great damage in our country. It’s time to pray about this – a lot.