Category Archives: Emails

FBI director James Comey: Russians didn’t influence the election, James Clapper director of National Intelligence agrees, CIA director John Brennan “takes his marching orders from President Obama”, Democrat Party effort to delegitimize Trump’s victory

FBI director James Comey: Russians didn’t influence the election, James Clapper director of National Intelligence agrees, CIA director John Brennan “takes his marching orders from President Obama”, Democrat Party effort to delegitimize Trump’s victory

“Hillary Clinton used a private unsecure email server when Secretary of State and John Podesta used Gmail and now suddenly they are concerned about Russian hacks?”…Citizen Wells

“Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 U.S. intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false—we can say that the Russian government is not the source,”…Julian Assange

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

 

 

From Townhall December 14, 2016.

“Comey to Trump: The Russians Didn’t Influence the Election

In telephone conversations with Donald Trump, FBI Director James Comey assured the president-elect there was no credible evidence that Russia influenced the outcome of the recent U.S. presidential election by hacking the Democratic National Committee and the e-mails of John Podesta, the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

What’s more, Comey told Trump that James Clapper, the director of National Intelligence, agreed with this FBI assessment.

The only member of the U.S. intelligence community who was ready to assert that the Russians sanctioned the hacking was John Brennan, the director of the CIA, according to sources who were briefed on Comey’s conversations with Trump.

“And Brennan takes his marching orders from President Obama,” the sources quoted Comey as saying.

In Comey’s view, the leaks to the New York Times and the Washington Post alleging that the Russians tried—and perhaps even succeeded—in tilting the election to Trump were a Democratic Party effort to delegitimize Trump’s victory.

During their phone conversations, Comey informed Trump that the FBI had been alert for the past year to the danger that the Russians would try to cause mischief during the U.S. presidential election.”

Read more:

http://townhall.com/columnists/edklein/2016/12/14/comey-to-trump-the-russians-didnt-influence-the-election-n2259827

From Citizen Wells December 13, 2016.

“Most things are simple.

The CIA and Washington Post being complicit in accusing the Russians of hacking to the benefit of Trump certainly is.

The Washington Post motives are obvious.

And quite frankly, so is the CIA.

John Brennan headed The Analysis Corp in early 2008 when their employees/contractors breached Obama’s passport and associated records such as birth certificates, naturalization certificates, or oaths of allegiance.

From NewsMax January 12, 2009.

“OBAMA’S INTELLIGENCE ADVISER INVOLVED IN SECURITY BREACH

Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser, John O. Brennan, heads a firm that was cited in March for breaching sensitive files in the State Department’s passport office, according to a State Department Inspector General’s report released this past July.

The security breach, first reported by the Washington Times and later confirmed by State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, involved a contract employee of Brennan’s firm, The Analysis Corp., which has earned millions of dollars providing intelligence-related consulting services to federal agencies and private companies.

During a State Department briefing on March 21, 2008, McCormack confirmed that the contractor had accessed the passport files of presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and John McCain, and that the inspector general had launched an investigation.

Sources who tracked the investigation tell Newsmax that the main target of the breach was the Obama passport file, and that the contractor accessed the file in order to “cauterize” the records of potentially embarrassing information.

“They looked at the McCain and Clinton files as well to create confusion,” one knowledgeable source told Newsmax. “But this was basically an attempt to cauterize the Obama file.”

At the time of the breach, Brennan was working as an unpaid adviser to the Obama campaign.”

Why CIA claims Russians hacked Democrats, Obama appointed John Brennan CIA Director, Brennan firm The Analysis Corp breached Obama passport and associated files in 2008, Classic pay to play, Beholden to each other, Much of Obama administration concerned about prosecution and will do anything to stop Trump

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

Congress has Anthony Weiner emails, Iowa representative Steve King “Congress has preserved them for our access”, Do these emails prove pedophilia?, Remember the election is not over until January 6, 2017

Congress has Anthony Weiner emails, Iowa representative Steve King “Congress has preserved them for our access”, Do these emails prove pedophilia?, Remember the election is not over until January 6, 2017

“If This Story Gets Out, We Are Screwed”…Wikileaks: Doug Band to John Podesta

“James Comey’s decision to revive the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server and her handling of classified material came after he could no longer resist mounting pressure by mutinous agents in the FBI, including some of his top deputies, according to a source close to the embattled FBI director.”…Daily Mail October 30, 2016

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

 

 

I keep reminding you that the election is not over until January 6, 2017 when congress certifies the Electoral College votes.

The last opportunity to stop a candidate from being sworn in as president.

From the Daily Mail November 6, 2016.

“‘We’ve got our hands on all of them!’ Congressman says Republican lawmakers have their own set of Anthony Weiner’s 650,000 emails”

“An Iowa Congressman claimed on Sunday that Republicans on Capitol Hill have copies of the 650,000 emails the FBI recovered from a computer belonging to Anthony Weiner.

‘The good thing is, Congress has preserved them for our access,’ Iowa Rep. Steve King said before a Donald Trump rally in Sioux City.

‘So the Weiner leaks, the WikiLeaks, you name your leaks, we’ve got our hands on all of them – 650,000 emails.’

King also suggested that the number of emails related to the FBI investigation may be larger than 650,000.

‘It’s crazy to think that this America is going to step into a world of Hillary,’ the conservative congressman said, ‘a world of Hillary with her corruption that goes so deep that we’re now at 750,000 hidden emails.’

The FBI seized Weiner’s laptop as part of a federal probe into allegationsm, first reported by DailyMail.com, that he carried on a lurid sexting relationship with a 15-year-old girl.

The machine has yielded a treasure trove of messages that include some related to Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state.

Some of those emails could disprove Clinton’s claim under oath that she gave the State Department all of her work-related messages in 2014.

It’s unclear how members of Congress might have obtained copies of the emails from Weiner’s laptop, since they are part of an ongoing criminal investigation.

But news reports have described an atmosphere of outrage at the FBI among rank-and-file agents who believe Clinton was let off the hook after thousands of classified documents were found among the messages on her server.

King’s Capitol Hill spokeswoman did not respond to a request for clarification.”

Read more:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3910766/We-ve-got-hands-Congressman-says-Republican-lawmakers-set-Anthony-Weiner-s-650-000-emails.html#ixzz4PTR0OZxS

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Hillary steps down for medical reasons before indictment, 3 compelling sources reveal Hillary evil, David Schippers, James Kallstrom former second in command of FBI, Concensus from current FBI agents, 90 % chance of indictment, Question is when

Hillary steps down for medical reasons before indictment, 3 compelling sources reveal Hillary evil, David Schippers, James Kallstrom former second in command of FBI, Concensus from current FBI agents, 90 % chance of indictment, Question is when

“If This Story Gets Out, We Are Screwed”…Wikileaks: Doug Band to John Podesta

“James Comey’s decision to revive the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server and her handling of classified material came after he could no longer resist mounting pressure by mutinous agents in the FBI, including some of his top deputies, according to a source close to the embattled FBI director.”…Daily Mail October 30, 2016

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

 

I do not believe that Hillary Clinton would step down for the good of the country.

She is a sociopath.

She may do it to save face, for “medical reasons”.

There is a very good chance that Hillary will be indicted.

The question is when.

It does not have to occur before November 8 to deny her the presidency.

“Sadly, most Americans are uninformed on the US President election process.

The Democrats appear to like it that way.

If you don’t believe that, check out Wikileaks.

Below is some important information on how this works.”

Hillary removal from election and inauguration, US election checkpoints and rules, General election through Electoral College certification and finally swearing in, Hillary can be removed before becoming president, High crimes and misdemeanors explained

David Schippers.

David Schippers, a long time Democrat and 2 time voter for Bill Clinton conducted an investigation for the House Judiciary Committee. So his findings were hardly part of a right wing conspiracy.

In fact, if there was any conspiracy, it included Republicans and Democrats who did not want to get their hands dirty or remove Clinton from office.

Schippers found far more felonious and/or improper activity by Bill Clinton than what was presented. He was restricted by time constraints and limited to the immediate scandals presented to him.

On Hillary Clinton: “evil incarnate.”

James Kallstrom, former second in command of FBI.

From a Megyn Kelly interview yesterday.

I’ve talked to hundreds and hundreds of agents in the FBI. And the agents are furious.
I think it’s people who are sick and tired of the lack of the rule of law being brought forward and due process being brought forward.
And they’re frustrated that they cannot conduct investigations properly.
They’re very very frustrated. They see the whole due process thing going down the tubes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=druv-2AjYeE

From YourNewsWire.com November 3, 2016.

“FBI: We’re Ready To Indict Hillary Clinton

The FBI have said there is a 90% chance that Hillary Clinton will be indicted within days, as evidence of a Washington pedophile ring involving the Clinton Foundation emerges. 

Multiple reports of FBI agents speaking to major media outlets over the last 24 hours since the child sex scandalbroke say that the department is “actively and aggressively” pursuing the Clintons in five separate probes.”

“A deep hatred of Hillary Clinton exists within the FBI, multiple bureau agents told the Guardian. Agents explained that Clinton is considered “the antichrist” within the department, and a desire to stop her being elected spurred the rapid series of damaging leaks just days before the election.

A Wall Street Journal report says the FBI’s pursuit of the case is rooted in recordings of a suspect in a different corruption case who spoke about the Clinton Foundation’s dirty dealings.

FBI: “90% Chance Of Indictment And Prosecution”

The FBI say there is a 90% chance of indictment and prosecution for Hillary Clinton and others connected to the Clinton Foundation and Clinton campaign.”

http://yournewswire.com/fbi-hillary-clinton-indictment/

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

“Hillary should take lie detector test” says alleged Clinton sex assault victim, Wikileaks email # 45134, From Iain Dey New York correspondent for The Sunday Times, Kathleen Willey challenged Hillary to take test, Answer questions about husband’s alleged sexual attacks

“Hillary should take lie detector test” says alleged Clinton sex assault victim, Wikileaks email # 45134, From Iain Dey New York correspondent for The Sunday Times, Kathleen Willey challenged Hillary to take test, Answer questions about husband’s alleged sexual attacks

“If This Story Gets Out, We Are Screwed”…Wikileaks: Doug Band to John Podesta

“James Comey’s decision to revive the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server and her handling of classified material came after he could no longer resist mounting pressure by mutinous agents in the FBI, including some of his top deputies, according to a source close to the embattled FBI director.”…Daily Mail October 30, 2016

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

 

 

From Wikileaks email # 45134.

“Fwd: “HILLARY SHOULD TAKE LIE DETECTOR TEST” SAYS ALLEGED CLINTON SEX ASSAULT VICTIM
From:Tina@presidentclinton.com
To: john.podesta@gmail.com
Date: 2016-01-08 16:59
Subject: Fwd: “HILLARY SHOULD TAKE LIE DETECTOR TEST” SAYS ALLEGED CLINTON SEX ASSAULT VICTIM
Begin forwarded message:

From: Craig Minassian <cminassian@clintonfoundation.org<mailto:cminassian@clintonfoundation.org>>
Date: January 8, 2016 at 1:49:32 PM EST
To: Tina Flournoy <Tina@presidentclinton.com<mailto:Tina@presidentclinton.com>>, “Angel Urena – PC” <angel@presidentclinton.com<mailto:angel@presidentclinton.com>>
Subject: Fwd: “HILLARY SHOULD TAKE LIE DETECTOR TEST” SAYS ALLEGED CLINTON SEX ASSAULT VICTIM

He bcc’d me this outreach to the campaign

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: “Dey, Iain” <iain.dey@sunday-times.co.uk<mailto:iain.dey@sunday-times.co.uk>>
Date: January 8, 2016 at 1:18:10 PM EST
To: press@hillaryclinton.com<mailto:press@hillaryclinton.com>
Subject: “HILLARY SHOULD TAKE LIE DETECTOR TEST” SAYS ALLEGED CLINTON SEX ASSAULT VICTIM

Hi there,

My name is Iain Dey. I am the New York Correspondent for The Sunday Times, the British newspaper.

I have been talking to Kathleen Willey, one of the women who has accused President Clinton of sexually assault for many years.

She has challenged Secretary Clinton to take a lie detector test – in front of Chelsea and baby Charlotte – while answering questions about her husband’s alleged sexual attacks.

I wanted to give Sec Clinton a chance to respond to that suggestion.

Before you tell me, I know that were attempts to discredit Kathleen at the time. She also admits that she previously lied to the FBI, but she has explained to me her reasons for doing so – which make sense.

Her story is the same – that Pres Clinton grabbed and groped her in a room adjacent to the oval office after she went to ask him for a job.

She also claims to have been subjected to extensive harassment and death threats immediately before she gave a deposition in relation to the Paula Jones case. She believes this to have been instigated by the Clinton camp at the time, but obviously has no proof.

If there is any response to any of this please respond as soon as possible. I am now on deadline.

Sorry to spring this, but I have only spoken to Kathleen this morning.

Many thanks
Iain Dey

IAIN DEY
New York Correspondent
The Sunday Times of London
+1 929 275 1555
Twitter: @IainDey

[http://imgur.com/NnYimGn.jpg]”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/45134

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Peter Kadzik background Podesta Clinton Justice Dept. history, Multiple conflicts of interest, Kadzik must be recused from any involvement with FBI Hillary emails investigation, House Judiciary committee must step in

Peter Kadzik background Podesta Clinton Justice Dept. history, Multiple conflicts of interest, Kadzik must be recused from any involvement with FBI Hillary emails investigation, House Judiciary committee must step in

“If This Story Gets Out, We Are Screwed”…Wikileaks: Doug Band to John Podesta

“James Comey’s decision to revive the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server and her handling of classified material came after he could no longer resist mounting pressure by mutinous agents in the FBI, including some of his top deputies, according to a source close to the embattled FBI director.”…Daily Mail October 30, 2016

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

 

Hillary Clinton, DNC, John Podesta and FBI emails investigation news is happening fast.

We just learned that Peter Kadzik of the Justice Dept. is overseeing the FBI investigation of Hillary emails found on Anthony Weiner/Huma Abedin devices.

And according to John Podesta, Peter Kadzik “Kept me out of jail”.

There is much more to this story and The Daily Caller has it.

“The day after Hillary Clinton testified in front of the House Select Committee on Benghazi last October, John Podesta, the Democrat’s campaign chairman, met for dinner with a small group of well-connected friends, including Peter Kadzik, a top official at the Justice Department.

The dinner arrangement, revealed in hacked Podesta emails released by WikiLeaks, is just the latest example of an apparent conflict of interest between the Clinton campaign and the federal agency charged with investigating the former secretary of state’s email practices.

Podesta and Kadzik, the assistant attorney general for legislative affairs, were in frequent contact, other emails show. In one email from January, Kadzik and Podesta, who were classmates at Georgetown Law School in the 1970s, discussed plans to celebrate Podesta’s birthday. And in another sent last May, Kadzik’s son emailed Podesta asking for a job on the Clinton campaign.

The post-Benghazi dinner was attended by Podesta, Kadzik, superlobbyist Vincent Roberti and other well-placed Beltway fixtures.”

“Kadzik, who started at the DOJ in 2013, helped spearhead the effort to nominate Lynch, who was heavily criticized for her secret meeting with the former president.

In the trenches

Podesta and Kadzik have a long history — one which has largely gone unnoticed during the ongoing Clinton email scandal.

Kadzik represented Podesta during the Monica Lewinsky investigation. And in the waning days of the Bill Clinton administration, Kadzik lobbied Podesta on behalf of Marc Rich, the fugitive who Bill Clinton controversially pardoned on his last day in office.

That history is cited by Podesta in another email hacked from his Gmail account.

In a Sept. 2008 email, which the Washington Free Beacon flagged last week, Podesta emailed an Obama campaign official to recommend Kadzik for a supportive role in the campaign.

Podesta, who would later head up the Obama White House transition effort, wrote that Kadzik was a “fantastic lawyer” who “kept me out of jail.””

“Podesta had been promoted to Clinton’s chief of staff when he and Kadzik became embroiled in another scandal.

Kadzik was then representing Marc Rich, a billionaire financier who was wanted by the U.S. government for evading a $48 million tax bill. The fugitive, who was also implicated in illegal trading activity with nations that sponsored terrorism, had been living in Switzerland for 17 years when he sought the pardon.

To help Rich, Kadzik lobbied Podesta heavily in the weeks before Clinton left office on Jan. 20, 2001.

A House Oversight Committee report released in May 2002 stated that “Kadzik was recruited into Marc Rich’s lobbying campaign because he was a long-time friend of White House Chief of Staff John Podesta.””

“DeSantis, a Republican, suggested that Lynch’s appointment by Bill Clinton in 1999 as U.S. Attorney in New York may be considered a conflict of interest. He also asserted that Obama’s political appointees — a list which includes Kadzik — “are being asked to impartially execute their respective duties as Department of Justice officials that may involve an investigation into the activities of the forerunner for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States.”

Read more:

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/25/clinton-campaign-chairman-had-multiple-dinners-with-top-doj-official-during-clinton-email-investigation/#ixzz4Omq0F4dt
Read more:

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/25/clinton-campaign-chairman-had-multiple-dinners-with-top-doj-official-during-clinton-email-investigation/#ixzz4OmobHQVl

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

Wikileaks Brent Budowsky email to John Podesta, “Sid is lost in his own web of conspiracies”, “disquieting that when HRC was secretary of state she spent a good time of time doing gossip emails with Sid Blumenthal”, “gives me the creeps”

Wikileaks Brent Budowsky email to John Podesta, “Sid is lost in his own web of conspiracies”, “disquieting that when HRC was secretary of state she spent a good time of time doing gossip emails with Sid Blumenthal”, “gives me the creeps”

“#CNN says #Hillary team in 2008 never raised #birther issue. #SidBlumenthal, long-time #HRC buddy, told me in person #Obama born in #kenya”…James Asher, Twitter

“The sad tale of Mr. Blumenthal is especially timely now because this poisonous gasbag could get a job in the Hillary Clinton administration and because he continues to pump out malicious information to his willing accomplices in the media. It’s also important because similarly amoral people surround Ms. Clinton and they will do anything and say anything in the name of political victory.”
“That tells you a lot about Hillary Clinton and what type of president she would be. While she does have a wicked sense of humor and is quite possibly the best prepared of all major candidates now running for the presidency, her election would be great news for Sidney Blumenthal and, ipso facto, terrible news for the world.”… Observer November 3, 2015

“Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime confidant of Bill and Hillary Clinton, earned about $10,000 a month as a full-time employee of the Clinton Foundation while he was providing unsolicited intelligence on Libya to then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton”…Politico May 28, 2015

 

 

From Wikileaks John Podesta leaked emails.

“Re: New Clinton emails

From:john.podesta@gmail.com To: brentbbi@webtv.net Date: 2016-01-01 20:01 Subject: Re: New Clinton emails

Sid is lost in his own web of conspiracies. I pay zero attention to what he says.

On Friday, January 1, 2016, Brent Budowsky <brentbbi@webtv.net> wrote:

> John, assume I wrote a thousand words about this. It is disquieting that
> when HRC was secretary of state she spent a good time of time doing gossip
> emails with Sid Blumenthal about various matters, the ubiquitous Lanny
> Davis shilling for himself in pathetic ways, and Neera Tanden gossiping
> about what Soros thinks of Obama. At least Tanden I regard as a serious
> person. Sid and Lanny I do not by standards of a secretary of state or
> potential president. >

> I was not in touch with you at the time of the healthcare debate, but what
> Sid suggests does not strike me as your style. I was in very regular and
> close touch with Daschle at the time, and he would never have said to the
> press what Sid suggests, and since I am in the press I know those were not
> his views. I guarantee that based on direct personal knowledge of Tom’s
> views and actions at the time. Blumenthal did not have the slightest idea
> of what he was talking about in his girlie gossip with the secretary of
> state about this. Why she places such great stock over so much time in
> these exchanges with Blumenthal is mystifying to me—and frankly
> troublesome. >

> This whole subject, to use vernacular, gives me the creeps. Secretaries
> of state, presidential candidates and presidents should not be spending
> their time on this kind of minor league stuff. >

Sent from my iPad”

 

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7432

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

Wikileaks Hillary et al weasel words on Benghazi dead Americans emails technology, Podesta Kendall Mills Abedin and host of others, “I don’t mind the “backs of dead Americans” because we need a bit of moral outrage”, Media “allies”

Wikileaks Hillary et al weasel words on Benghazi dead Americans emails technology, Podesta Kendall Mills Abedin and host of others, “I don’t mind the “backs of dead Americans” because we need a bit of moral outrage”, Media “allies”

“I watched her on countless occasions blatantly lie to the American people and knowingly lie.”…Linda Tripp

“The question that I had in my mind, was why did we not do something to protect our forces?”…Charles Woods, father of slain Navy Seal

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

 

From Wikileaks.

The emails speak for themselves.

___________________

“From:DKendall@wc.com To: dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com, jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com, KTurner@wc.com, gruncom@aol.com, jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com, john.podesta@gmail.com more Date: 2015-10-18 16:05 Subject: Re: DRAFT: Opening Statement

I like it. My one question: in the 6th graf, before “At this point . . .”, should the following be inserted–“After previously testifying about this matter in both the Senate and the House,”?

From: Dan Schwerin [mailto:dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com] Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 01:40 PM To: Jake Sullivan <jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com>; Turner, Katherine; Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com>; Jennifer Palmieri <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>; Kendall, David; John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Adrienne Elrod <aelrod@hillaryclinton.com>; Philippe Reines <pir@hrcoffice.com>; Sara Latham <slatham@hillaryclinton.com>; Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com>; Heather Samuelson <hsamuelson@cdmillsgroup.com>; Brian Fallon <bfallon@hillaryclinton.com>; Huma Abedin <ha16@hillaryclinton.com>; Phil Schiliro <pschiliro@sb-atalaya.com>; Phil Barnett <pbarnett@sb-atalaya.com>; Matt Siegler <matt@sb-atalaya.com> Subject: Re: DRAFT: Opening Statement

Flagging this draft again in hopes folks can take a look. Thanks Dan

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com<mailto:dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com>> wrote:

Here’s a revised opening statement based on our discussion this morning. Dan

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Jake Sullivan <jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com<mailto:jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com>> wrote:

This is a big line of Gowdy questioning. How did you strike balance? Elsewhere you so close up shop when things get dangerous.

On Oct 17, 2015, at 10:22 AM, Turner, Katherine <KTurner@wc.com<mailto:KTurner@wc.com>> wrote:

One further thought on the current draft: we might consider softening the “Chris did not believe retreat was an option – and neither do I” line. I don’t think we want to suggest that there was a commitment to be there at any and all costs; but rather, that the known risks were being balanced with the reasons for being there, regular assessments of this balance were made, and that the people on the ground were best-positioned to contribute to those assessments.

Katherine Turner Williams & Connolly LLP 725 Twelfth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20005 (P) 202-434-5487<tel:202-434-5487> | (F) 202-434-5029<tel:202-434-5029> kturner@wc.com<mailto:kturner@wc.com> | http://www.wc.com/kturner&lt;http://www.wc.com/kturner&gt;

From: Dan Schwerin [mailto:dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com] Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 8:07 PM To: Mandy Grunwald; Jennifer Palmieri; Kendall, David; Jake Sullivan; John Podesta; Adrienne Elrod; Philippe Reines; Sara Latham; Cheryl Mills; Heather Samuelson; Turner, Katherine; Brian Fallon; Huma Abedin; Phil Schiliro; Phil Barnett; Matt Siegler Subject: Re: DRAFT: Opening Statement

A few more edits after talking with Phil S

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com<mailto:dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com>> wrote:

Here are some modest revisions. Am going to send this over to HRC so she can start thinking about it as well. Thanks all. Dan

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com<mailto:dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com>> wrote:

That “backs of dead Americans” line is stolen from Hard Choices, so maybe a good idea to tweak slightly anyhow. I’ll play with some alternatives. If folks have other concerns before I send on to HRC, please let me know.

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com<mailto:gruncom@aol.com>> wrote:

I also think it’s strong.

I don’t mind the “backs of dead Americans” because we need a bit of moral outrage. I suppose we can dial the language back, but the sense of outrage should remain. Mandy Grunwald Grunwald Communications 202 973-9400<tel:202%20973-9400>


I think it is good. Imagine the clip they will use is the partisan slugfest sentence. I don’t love “backs of dead Americans” in that sentence. I think that is too graphic and splashes back on her as appearing to exploit their deaths. Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 16, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Kendall, David <DKendall@wc.com<mailto:DKendall@wc.com>> wrote:

I like it. Just two thoughts. We twice call the ARB “independent”—I’d prefer to call it “non-partisan” as we do once in the draft. Hard Choices did not call it “independent”, and since it’s appointed by and responsible to the Secretary, I think we open an avenue of attack by calling it “independent”. Can we get some more numbers into the early “diplomacy is dangerous” discussion? Sixty-six American diplomatic personnel and over a hundred contractors and locally employed staff killed since the 1970’s (or whatever the numbers are). I recognize we have some numbers on page 3 (Beirut bombing, 1998 attacks).

David E. Kendall Williams & Connolly LLP 725 Twelfth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20005 (P) 202-434-5145<tel:202-434-5145> | (F) 202-434-5029<tel:202-434-5029> dkendall@wc.com<mailto:dkendall@wc.com> | http://www.wc.com/dkendall&lt;http://www.wc.com/dkendall&gt;

From: Dan Schwerin [mailto:dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com] Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 2:31 PM To: Jake Sullivan; John Podesta; Adrienne Elrod; Mandy Grunwald; Philippe Reines; Sara Latham; Cheryl Mills; Heather Samuelson; Kendall, David; Turner, Katherine; Brian Fallon; Jennifer Palmieri; Huma Abedin; Phil Schiliro; Phil Barnett; Matt Siegler Subject: DRAFT: Opening Statement

Here is a draft of HRC’s opening statement based on our discussion today. As Cheryl mentioned, we’d love to get this to HRC for a first read tonight or tomorrow, so quick feedback would be great. Thanks Dan”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2702

___________________

From:john.podesta@gmail.com To: cheryl.mills@gmail.com Date: 2015-03-13 11:02 Subject: Re: Statement

He reacted badly when asked on Sunday show. My perspective is that we want the fight to be about Benghazi, not about servers in her basement. This helps move the story back in that direction. JP –Sent from my iPad– john.podesta@gmail.com For scheduling: eryn.sepp@gmail.com

On Mar 13, 2015, at 8:50 AM, Cheryl Mills <cheryl.mills@gmail.com> wrote:

Not on board – why poke the bear.

cdm

On Mar 13, 2015, at 8:48 AM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote:

Thoughts? I think we are off an aggressive statement saying I’m ready to testify any place any time. Kendall thinks it will take 3 weeks to prepare on emails, which puts us right up against the launch time. The statement below intended to insert ourselves back into the offense without opening up a response of “ok be here Monday.”

David is ok with calling for the release of what’s already been sent to committee as we are trying to do here. Massively opposed to the first idea of “I’m ready to testify” bravado. Thoughts?

JP
–Sent from my iPad–
john.podesta@gmail.com
For scheduling: eryn.sepp@gmail.com

Begin forwarded message:

From: Kristina Schake <kristinakschake@gmail.com>
Date: March 12, 2015 at 7:31:32 PM EDT
To: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>, Jen Palmieri <jennifer.m.palmieri@gmail.com>, Robert Mook robbymook2015@gmail.com>
Subject: Statement

John, below is the draft statement that we discussed this morning for your review. After we receive your edits and if you are ok to proceed, we will send this to her in the morning with a note explaining the strategy. Our plan would be to release it mid-day tomorrow to get ahead of Sunday’s shows.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton released the following statement joining the Democrats on the House Select Committee on Benghazi in calling on Chairman Trey Gowdy to publicly release the hundreds of Benghazi-related emails that the State Department has already provided to the Committee.

“The terrorist attacks in Benghazi were a tragedy for our nation and most of all for the families of the brave public servants we lost that day. As Secretary of State, I was ultimately responsible for my people’s safety, and my greatest regret from my time as Secretary is that not all of them returned home to their families. That is why from the start I ordered everyone at the State Department to cooperate fully with every investigation and every attempt to learn lessons from this tragedy that could help better protect our people in the future.

In addition to a comprehensive investigation by an independent Accountability Review Board, nine different Congressional committees have now held hearings on Benghazi and reviewed thousands of pages of documents.

I myself have publicly testified before both the House and Senate and held a classified briefing for members, and the State Department has provided hundreds of relevant documents and emails. I’ve already said that I’m more than happy to testify again. We should all focus on constructive steps that advance our national security, not political posturing.

Today I join Congressman Cummings and the Democrats on the House Select Committee on Benghazi in calling on Chairman Gowdy to immediately release all my emails related to Benghazi, many of which he has had since August. Those emails should be available immediately while the State Department works on my request to release all of my work-related emails to the public – an unprecedented disclosure far beyond any official requirement.

I hope the Committee acts quickly, and that it’s focus going forward is on preventing attacks like this in the future.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3006

___________________

From:dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com To: john.podesta@gmail.com Date: 2015-08-08 14:59 Subject: Re: Open Letter

Fixed

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 12:54 PM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote:

Sorry, one more edit. I think we should drop the sentence on how
classified info was delivered. It opens the door to “briefed classified
info” ending up in emails.
Otherwise I’m fine.

On Saturday, August 8, 2015, Huma Abedin <ha16@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:

if we aim for statement today, avail monday and univision on tuesday, i
like that

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Jennifer Palmieri
jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:

Dan – I will send her the statement and press plan so we can present in
one document.

I have a new thought on potential interviewer – Maria Elena Salinas of
Univision.

I would bill it as an interview on college affordability and she would
ask her a few questions on emails.

As you all know, I had hoped that we could use the “server moment” as an
opportunity for her to be viewed as having take a big step to deal with the
email problem that would best position us for what is ahead. It is clear
that she is not in same place (unless John has a convo with her and gets
her in a different place).

Accepting that, I think Univision is best chance for success. We have
momentum coming out of Jeb’s women’s health comment and their bad debate.
A Univision interview will be viewed as more offense and show that she is
confident and not rattled.

How does that strike folks?

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 8, 2015, at 12:22 PM, Dan Schwerin <dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com>
wrote:

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 8, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Heather Samuelson
hsamuelson@cdmillsgroup.com> wrote:

I’m fine with “consistent with practice of prior Secretaries..” But
will remove reference to Powell in factsheet so we don’t single him out.

Will send around revisions to factsheet momentarily.

*From:* Dan Schwerin
*Sent:* ‎Saturday‎, ‎August‎ ‎8‎, ‎2015 ‎12‎:‎22‎ ‎PM
*To:* Jennifer Palmieri
*Cc:* Heather Samuelson, Christina Reynolds, Huma Abedin, Nick Merrill, Kendall,
David, Cheryl Mills, Robby Mook, Brian Fallon, Kristina Schake, Jake
Sullivan, Katherine Turner, John Podesta

Revised. Please take another quick look as I think we should get to her
asap. Two questions:
1) What do we do about Powell? Here I’ve mirrored language from the
Q&A, which says “consistent with the practice of prior Secretaries of
State,” but are we comfortable with that?
2) Am i sending her this and the spox statement or Jen, so you want to
do that? Either way, we’ll need to explain the two options.

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Jennifer Palmieri
jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:

Plus Reynolds to this chain

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 8, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Heather Samuelson
hsamuelson@cdmillsgroup.com> wrote:

How about this: Dan — will call you.

When I arrived at the State Department in early 2009, I immediately got
to work rebuilding America’s tarnished global reputation and take on
pressing challenges in nearly every region of the world. At the time,
using a personal account seemed convenient. Previous Secretaries of
State had used personal email accounts with no problems.”

Read more:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3372

___________________

“One other point is that there is very little in the talking points about the emails. That may make sense, but if you want talking points for allies to use, here would be two possible ones to add:”

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1061

More emails involving Attorney David Kendall here:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/?q=kendall&mfrom=&mto=&title=&notitle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=&noto=&count=50&sort=6#searchresult

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

Hillary’s IT guy caught asking how to destroy evidence!, Hillary’s IT guy just broke! What he leaked about Hillary will lose her the election!, Citizen Wells commenter bob strauss

Hillary’s IT guy caught asking how to destroy evidence!, Hillary’s IT guy just broke! What he leaked about Hillary will lose her the election!, Citizen Wells commenter bob strauss

“I watched her on countless occasions blatantly lie to the American people and knowingly lie.”…Linda Tripp

“By July 1993, the Clintons and their associates had established
a pattern of concealment with respect to the Clintons’ involvement
with Whitewater and the Madison S&L. Because of the complexity
of the allegations of misdeeds involving these institutions, documents
and files are critical to any inquiries into the matter. Yet,
at every important turn, crucial files and documents ‘‘disappeared’’
or were withheld from scrutiny whenever questions were raised.…Senate Whitewater report June 13, 1996

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

 

 

From Citizen Wells commenter bob strauss.

“Hillary’s IT Guy Just Broke! What He Leaked About Hillary Will LOSE Her The Election!

Paul Combeta is an IT engineer who helped Hillary delete her server and clear it of evidence that will compromise her. Well, Paul Combeta took the issue to online forums in order to ask for help on how to destroy evidence and wipe his trail. As it turns out, everything was recorded and this evidence that just surfaced will lose Hillary the election!

VIA The Political Insider

Under a posting on 8chan titled “Here is clear proof that Hillary sought to destroy evidence,” Combetta can be seen posting under a username he uses multiple times across multiple platforms, ‘stonetear.’

In a screenshot of the discussion, Combetta (or stonetear) can be seen telling others “I need to strip out a VIP’s (VERY VIP) email address from a bunch of archived emails.”

Presumably, that VIP would be Secretary of State Clinton.

Whoa. HRod’s now immunity-protected BleachBitter Paul Combetta on REDDIT two years ago. https://t.co/M7khmkEek0 pic.twitter.com/KqHJhiRerY

— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) September 19, 2016

Later on in the thread, Combetta asks if there’s a way to “rewrite” the e-mails for his ‘VIP.’

One user tries to warn Combetta that changing the e-mails is not possible as it “could result in major legal issues.”

SMOKING GUN: “BleachBit” Paul Combetta ASKED TO STRIP OR REPLACE VIP’s EMAIL ADDRESS! https://t.co/nz13MqzWth #MAGA pic.twitter.com/qQII96JI76

As word began circulating that Combetta had been caught red-handed asking how to illegally forge Hillary’s e-mails, the man known as ‘stonetear’ began deleting his messages on the forum.

Twitter user Erik Jones took video in which he refreshed his screen to show the messages disappearing. Watch …

Hillarys bleackbit specialist Paul Combetta deleting all of his reddit posts on video. @Lauren_Southern @Cernovichhttps://t.co/KZ9trBVpys

— Erik Jones (@SMOKeMON_TRAINR) September 19, 2016

Hillary’s IT guy made the post on July 24, 2014 and can be read in it’s entirety below:

[July 24, 2014] Hello all- I may be facing a very interesting situation where I need to strip out a VIP’s (VERY VIP) email address from a bunch of archived email that I have both in a live Exchange mailbox, as well as a PST file. Basically, they don’t want the VIP’s email address exposed to anyone, and want to be able to either strip out or replace the email address in the to/from fields in all of the emails we want to send out.

I am not sure if something like this is possible with PowerShell, or exporting all of the emails to MSG and doing find/replaces with a batch processing program of some sort.

Does anyone have experience with something like this, and/or suggestions on how this might be accomplished?

It’s important to note the date, which was within 24 hours of a recent New York Post report that showed Combetta at that time trying to ship archived data to Clinton Executive Services Corp., or CESC, which handles logistics for Hillary and Bill Clinton.

So, what do you think? Will this finally finish Hillary for good? Will James Comey finally find courage and arrest Hillary?! Well… only time will tell.

Source:

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com

http://usanewsflash.com/hillary-cost-election/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Abedin emails NewsMax Christopher Ruddy request, August 2009, Ruddy made a contribution to the Clinton Foundation of between $1 and $5 million, Set up meeting with Ambassador to Panama Barbara Stephenson on behalf of lobbyist Amb. Otto Reich

Abedin emails NewsMax Christopher Ruddy request, August 2009, Ruddy made a contribution to the Clinton Foundation of between $1 and $5 million, Set up meeting with Ambassador to Panama Barbara Stephenson on behalf of lobbyist Amb. Otto Reich

“As Catastrophe: Clinton’s Role in America’s Worst Disaster demonstrates, the events of September 11 not only were predictable after eight years of Clinton, but they also could have been prevented.
Catastrophe exposes what really happened during the Clinton years, and how Bill Clinton and his administration systematically undermined America’s national security by emasculating the U.S. military and the nation’s intelligence agencies.
Bill Clinton made America vulnerable to attack.”…Amazon on “Catastrophe” by Christopher Ruddy

“If the guilty and unrepentant get off easy, what type of
prosecution is this. It’s not time to blame the Independent
Counsel Law; blame the prosecutor who wouldn’t do his job.
Because of Kenneth W. Starr’s complicity, the most corrupt
administration in the history of the country continues with
no end in sight. God save us all.”…Christopher Ruddy, NewsMax July 1, 1999

“The point is simple. There are many people today who are profiting from their allegedly “conservative” credentials. But some of them – like my old friend Chris Ruddy – have become part of the problem. They haven’t just “compromised,” they’ve gone over to the dark side. In fact, some of them are playing both sides against the middle in an indecent grasp to be part of the establishment.
I just thought you should know.”…Joseph Farah

 

 

From Judicial Watch September 1, 2016.

The Abedin emails include a mid-August 2009, email exchange in which Band urges Abedin to follow up on a request from Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy to set up a meeting with then-Ambassador to Panama Barbara Stephenson on behalf of lobbyist Amb. Otto Reich, President Reagan’s ambassador to Venezuela who maintained high-level government positions during the tenure of both President George H.W. Bush and President George Bush.  In early September, Ruddy then was contacted by State Department Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs, Roberta S. Jacobson, at the behest of Band and Abedin, in reference to Ruddy’s concerns about Wilson Lucom, whose estate was embroiled in a heated multi-million-dollar lawsuit.  Ruddy’s Newsmax Media Inc, made a contribution to the Clinton Foundation of between $1 million and $5 million. The emails show the responsible official was put in contact with Ruddy.

FromChristopher [Redacted]

To: Doug Band [Redacted]

Sent: Mon Aug 17 3:40:56 2009

Subject: Panama

Otto Reich is arriving in Panama tonite on the matter I discussed. He was hoping to meet with Barbara Stephenson or her Charge this week. He has not heard back from her. Any “air’ support you can give for this meeting would be helpful. Thanks! – Christopher Ruddy

From: Doug Band

To: Huma Abedin

Sent: Aug 18, 2009 10:37 PM

Subject: Fw: Panama

Would be good to do quickly.

Even a call

From: Huma Abedin

To: Doug Band

Sent: Wed Aug 19 4:51:35 2009

Subject: Re: Panama

Both of our point people are out on vacation. I can ask someone junior to deal with this?

From: Doug Band

Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 5:20:13 PM

To: Huma Abedin

Subject: Re: Panama

Sure

From: Jacobson, Roberta S

Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 7:32 AM

To: ruddy [Redacted]

Subject: Panama case

Mr. Ruddy: Your inquiry about the Lucom case has been passed to the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs here at State. I apologize for not getting you a response on our position last evening, but we will get back to you as soon as possible today. Many thanks. Roberta Jacobson.

From: Christopher Ruddy

To: dband

Sent: Fri Sep 04, 08:01:20 2009 7:32 AM

Subject: FW: Panama case

From: Doug Band

To: Huma Abedin

Sent: Fri Sep 04 08:18:43 2009

Subject: Fw: Panama case

From: Huma Abedin

Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 8:37:21 AM

To: Doug Band

Subject: Re: Panama case

She’s the dep assistant secretary for the whole bureau.

The Panama desk guy is on leave so I asked that she at least reach out.

(Newsmax publishes a regular Judicial Watch column.)

Read more:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-abedin-emails-reveal-top-clinton-foundation-executive-doug-band-sought-diplomatic-passport-clinton-state-department/