Monthly Archives: October 2016

Wikileaks Assange tweets state that media made up HRC leak story, Hope to publish every week for next 10 weeks, Real Hillary story was “Can’t we just drone this guy?” and history of Clinton camp threats, Many Clinton associates threatened and/or killed

Wikileaks Assange tweets state that media made up HRC leak story, Hope to publish every week for next 10 weeks, Real Hillary story was “Can’t we just drone this guy?” and history of Clinton camp threats, Many Clinton associates threatened and/or killed

“Broaddrick herself told NewsMax.com last year that her home had been broken into, her pets released and her answering machine tape stolen while she and her husband were away briefly during the House impeachment probe.
“Let me tell you something. They were all over that woman,” Schippers told NewsMax.com. “And it was the type of stuff we ran into with the outfit (the Chicago mob). Intimidation just by watching her, making their presence known. … Just to let her know ‘We can do what we want.’ ””…David Schippers

“The fact of the matter is Hillary is a terrorist. I invite you to look up the definition of terrorism. It is the use of violence, threats, or intimidation to achieve a political aim”…Dolly Kyle Browning

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

From Wikileaks Twitter Account:

  1. WikiLeaks Retweeted WikiLeaks Task Force

    WikiLeaks is building an army to protect and promote its upcoming publications. Follow

    WikiLeaks added,

  2. > Media makes up story that WikiLeaks press conference is for HRC leak. > Media gets mad when WikiLeaks press conference isn’t for HRC leak.

  3. : Regarding upcoming publications… We hope to be publishing every week for the next 10 weeks.

  4. : Follow and on Twitter to help defend WikiLeaks as it continues publications for this year.

  5. : The documents themselves are revealing, but also the government/state reactions to the releases are revealing also.

  6. : WikiLeaks has released 10 million documents over 10 years. That’s 10 billion words, averaging 3000 docs a day.

  7. “Assassinate Assange” video currently being shown at WikiLeaks 10 Year Anniversary press conference.

  8. WikiLeaks 10 Year press conference in Berlin has begun. Currently showing WikiLeaks Top 10 video.

  9. What has WikiLeaks published over the past ten years? Check out the WikiLeaks Top 10.

  10. In 30 min: WikiLeaks 10 Year Anniversary begins with Berlin press conference

 

Wikileaks, Assange did not promise a Hillary leak.

But what he did yesterday was highlight the real threats coming from Hillary and the Clinton camp.

“Can’t we just drone this guy?”

The email sent to Hillary which stated:

“an SP memo on possible legal and nonlegal strategies re wikileaks”

Not to mention the video of Bob Beckel stating that Assange should be killed.

If you have been paying attention, you know that a great many Clinton associates have been threatened and/or killed over decades.

Their threats have to be taken seriously.

“We have more info and we will publish everything when the time is right some of these materials can get Hillary Clinton to lose the nomination,” …Julain Assange

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

Hillary wicked leaks reveal past Clinton evils, Larry Patterson Arkansas state trooper 6 year governor security detail, Newsmax TV interview, N word was often used, Vince Foster coverup, Patterson was threatened

Hillary wicked leaks reveal past Clinton evils, Larry Patterson Arkansas state trooper 6 year governor security detail, Newsmax TV interview, N word was often used, Vince Foster coverup, Patterson was threatened

“George, in 1993 there was a total of 4 Arkansas State policemen who worked on the Governor’s Security Detail who came forward to tell their stories about what they had seen, what they had experienced in Arkansas working for Bill Clinton. And the major news media, they gave it a day, 2 days, play and then that was it, George. Then the Clinton spin doctors got a hold of it and it was to discredit the State Police – to destroy us.”…Larry Patterson, Arkansas State Trooper

“The fact of the matter is Hillary is a terrorist. I invite you to look up the definition of terrorism. It is the use of violence, threats, or intimidation to achieve a political aim”…Dolly Kyle Browning

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

 

The Julian Assange Wikileaks leaks are extremely important. Especially in the hyper Orwellian age we live in and uber biased mainstream media.

I also believe that the wicked leaks from Citizen Wells are too.

Most people have not seen this information, resurrected to the internet.

From NewsMax September 14, 1999 via Citizen News.

“More Than Sex

TV Interview of Clinton bodyguard Larry Patterson by George Putnam”

“You know, for 32 years, Trooper Patterson served with the Arkansas State Police. A highly commended officer, Patterson was assigned to the elite Governor’s Security Detail and for 6 years – day in day out – Patterson guarded Governor Bill Clinton. For 6 years Trooper Patterson lived intimately with Bill and Hillary Clinton. For 6 years, he became knowledgeable of their intimate secrets.

The establishment media has been telling you it’s just about sex and censoring and smearing this trooper. Well, today Larry Patterson is right here with us to tell us the Clintons’ story as his audio tape set says is “More Than Sex.” I want to welcome one of our true patriots in America, a dear friend of mine, Mr. Larry Patterson. Welcome Larry.

LP: Thank you, George. It’s a pleasure.

GP: You know, Larry, the question on everybody’s mind is: Is Hillary Clinton running for the Senate back there in New York?

LP: George, I can’t believe that this lady is going to make a run for the Senate. I can’t believe that she can stand the intense scrutiny that the media is going to give her.

GP: You knew this lady. Will you tell us what you can about her?

LP: George, I’ve never been around anyone as possessed and as driven as Hillary Clinton was. In 6 years, you rarely saw this lady ever let her hair down, ever enjoy herself. She wanted the presidency as much or more than Bill Clinton wanted it.

GP: Obviously you know; you know well about Clinton’s womanizing and you saw it firsthand. You know all the sordid details. Without being too graphic, Larry, would you explain some of the things you witnessed?

LP: Well, from blocking streets, George, late at night; sitting in ladies’ driveways till 3:00 and 4:00 in the morning… arranging these liaisons for the Governor…

GP: You know, Bill Clinton told the American people point blank on “60 Minutes” that he didn’t have an affair with Gennifer Flowers.

LP: I spent many hours in front of Gennifer Flowers’ apartment complex. I took literally 100 calls from Gennifer Flowers; she would call the mansion and said, “Let me talk to Bill.” It wasn’t “the Governor” or “Governor Clinton.” It was “Let me talk to Bill.”

GP: But you allege that he engaged in a massive abuse of power. It was, as you say, “More Than Sex.”

LP: George, the State Police Detail assigned to Bill Clinton was used to pimp. He would send us out in the crowd to get women’s names and telephone numbers and then in a week or two weeks or a month, they would end up in a state job or they would end up working in one of his campaigns. We blocked streets at night, we set in front of residences till the wee hours in the morning waiting on this man to come out…

GP: You tell of an incident outside Chelsea’s school – it was on parent/teacher’s night – when Bill Clinton went to meet her teachers.

LP: He had me block the street in front of Chelsea’s elementary school while he met a lady there, George, and had a liaison with this lady late at night.

GP: Right there?

LP: Blocked the street – the driveway going into the school, George.

GP: “More Than Sex” paints an intimate portrait of the Clintons at home. Now you say, Larry, that there were a lot of verbal arguments between Hillary and Bill and you claim that they would often make slurs against each other – anti-Semitic slurs, right?

LP: George, if these people were together for more than 3 or 4 hours, they were at each other, they were fighting; and many many times the anti-Semitic slurs were used. The “N” word was often used.

GP: And at one point, Bill Clinton made some shocking comments about a fellow state trooper – one who had died in the line of duty.

LP: George, he was in Southwest Arkansas at this trooper’s funeral and he made the statement in front of two other state policemen, “Well, I don’t know what the big deal is – he was just a ‘G-D-‘ pig…”

GP: Gasped- What!

GP: Larry, I want to stop you for a moment. We haven’t heard any of this in the press. Is this new? Is this all new material? Why haven’t we heard about it before?

LP: George, in 1993 there was a total of 4 Arkansas State policemen who worked on the Governor’s Security Detail who came forward to tell their stories about what they had seen, what they had experienced in Arkansas working for Bill Clinton. And the major news media, they gave it a day, 2 days, play and then that was it, George. Then the Clinton spin doctors got a hold of it and it was to discredit the State Police – to destroy us.

GP: You know, I’m amazed by your information, Larry. But there’s something more serious than anything else that we’ve talked about. It’s about Vincent Foster, the Former Deputy White House Counsel. In 1993 he died very suspiciously of a gunshot wound to the head. The government said he committed suicide; but two national …polls show that more than two-thirds of Americans don’t believe that and many believe he was in fact murdered. Now, you knew Vince Foster, didn’t you?

LP: Yes.

GP: Tell us about him.

LP: He was a partner in the Rose Law Firm and was a frequent visitor at the mansion. He was around many public events that the Governor and Hillary attended and was always very friendly and asked if he could be of any help if we ever needed anything. He was a very personable man, a good-looking guy, George.

GP: Now, let me ask you right now, point blank. You’re a cop – a damn good cop. You’re a sworn police officer. You’ve seen homicides. Do you believe Vince Foster actually killed himself?

LP: No I don’t and I don’t believe that he’d kill himself – if he did kill himself – in Fort Marcy Park.

GP: One of the reasons you say that Foster didn’t kill himself – you claim that you knew about Foster’s death before the park police had even found his body – at least 2 hours before the government said that they knew that Vince Foster was the dead man lying out there in the park.

LP: George, the shift I was working was 7:30 to 4:30. I had just left my employment at the State Police, had driven to my apartment, walked in the door, the phone was ringing, it was Roger Perry – another other trooper working at the Governor’s mansion. Roger had received a telephone call from Helen Dickey calling the Arkansas Governor’s mansion. Roger said Helen Dickey’s words were these verbatim: “Roger, Vince Foster has been found in the parking lot of the White House, dead in his car, of an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound.”

GP: The time situation…

LP: George, it was around 5:00 Central Standard Time.

GP: What you’re saying, Larry, is that people knew of Foster’s death before the officials claim that they found the body. What you’re saying, Larry, one need not be a Columbo, some kind of a detective, (to see) that there was a cover-up of this man’s death and that this cover-up is really bigger than the third-rate burglary at the Watergate. Larry, there have been several investigations into the Foster death but all have concluded suicide. Did special counsel Robert Fiske who first claimed to have a look into this – did he speak to you?

LP: No he did not.

GP: What? Never?

LP: Never.

GP: Did Ken Starr ever bring you before the Grand Jury on this overall matter?

LP: Never, George.

GP: What?

LP: Never.

GP: As you know, Larry, in 1996 the Senate Whitewater Committee was so concerned about your allegations that they actually had hearings. They brought Helen Dickey before the Committee. Let’s take a look at a video clip of that hearing:

Senate Whitewater Investigation – Feb. 15, 1996

Richard Ben-Veniste, Democratic Counsel: Do you recall, Miss Dickey, submitting an affidavit in September of ’95 to us?

Helen Dickey, Clinton Babysitter: Yes I do.

Richard Ben-Veniste, Democratic Counsel: And that affidavit was consistent with your testimony here today…

Helen Dickey, Clinton Babysitter: Yes.

Richard Ben-Veniste, Democratic Counsel: …in terms of the time that you made this call. The whole thing arose because a couple of former Arkansas State Troopers submitted affidavits that suggested that the call was much earlier – at 6:30 – and that was the purported basis upon which we have this headline story: “Foster Shot in White House Parking Lot” and so forth… or “Foster Committed Suicide in White House Parking Lot.” And as a result of those affidavits we then asked for the time records or the work records of the troopers in question and then the attorney for the troopers said, well, maybe the troopers didn’t want to testify after all.

GP: Helen Dickey says, “No, you’re wrong.” She made the call late that night. And the Senate Counsel – you heard him – he says that they checked your work records and that you and Trooper Perry refused to testify before the Committee. What’s this?

LP: I was never asked to testify. If I had been asked to testify, George, I would have been there.

GP: Never called to testify…

LP: That is true.

GP: Well, let’s make this crystal clear. The Senate held hearings about your allegations but they didn’t even bother to call you – the Senate Committee bold-faced lied about it. They lied to us – the American people.

LP: That is true.

GP: You’re an American hero. I know that you have been offered jobs and promotions to obtain your silence. You were threatened; you still are. But you spoke out and you’ve made some shocking disclosures and I’ve listened to your story on “More Than Sex” – on that taped set. You know, Larry, this proves to me that the American people are not being told the full story, the whole truth. You make many more new and shocking revelations on your audio set – “More Than Sex” – some of the things that, well, we can’t talk about on national television. Let me encourage people to get your taped set.”

http://citizenwells.net/2016/10/02/more-than-sex-tv-interview-of-clinton-bodyguard-larry-patterson-by-george-putnam-arkansas-trooper-patterson-lived-intimately-with-bill-and-hillary-clinton-the-n-word-was-often-used-clinton-spi/

Declaration of Gennifer G. Flowers March 12, 1998.

“My name is Gennifer G. Flowers. I am over twenty-one years of age and I am fully competent to make this declaration.

1. I met Bill Clinton in 1977 while I was working as a news reporter for KARK-TV in Little Rock, Arkansas. Shortly after we met, we began a sexual relationship that lasted for twelve years.

2. In the late 1970’s I moved away from Little Rock, living in Tulsa, Oklahoma, Branson, Missouri and Dallas, Texas. Bill Clinton and I maintained our relationship during this time. I returned to Little Rock in the mid-1980’s. We discussed my return to Little Rock and he indicated that he wanted to see me and continue our personal relationship. He encouraged me to come back and advised me to move into Quapaw Tower, a high-rise apartment building located in Little Rock. He told me that he had aides in the building and that it wouldn’t be so noticeable for him to come to that building to visit me. Chris Burrows, an employee of the State of Arkansas lived in the building.

3. Once I moved to the Quapaw Tower in Little Rock we continued our personal relationship on a more regular basis. Arkansas security officers assigned to the Governor’s Office drove Bill to the building and waited for him while he visited me. Bill’s visits were observed by and talked about by a watchman employed by Quapaw Tower, which upset Bill as he intensely verbalized in my tape-recorded conversation with him of December 1990. John Kauffman, manager of Quapaw Tower witnessed Bill’s visits to my apartment and complained about his car and driver parking in the building’s unloading zone for hours at a time.

4. Bill Clinton also instructed me to call either Larry Patterson or Roger Perry in order to communicate. He told me that he felt that he could trust them, and they were people that would help us communicate when necessary.

5. In early 1990 I told Bill Clinton that I wanted a job with the state. Bill Clinton told me to contact his assistant Judy Gaddy who would assist me with the application for employment. I met with Judy Gaddy in her office and she provided me with the details of what needed to be on the application. Judy Gaddy also told me to contact Clara Clark who set up a job interview for me. I was eventually employed by the state as an administrative assistant for the Arkansas Appeal Tribunal.

6. Shortly after I was employed by the state, another woman who had applied for my job filed a grievance or some sort of complaint in which she alleged that she was more qualified and implied that the only reason I got the job was because I had had an affair with Bill Clinton. I was called to testify before a panel in connection with this proceeding. When I learned that I would have to testify, I did not know what to do, so I called Bill Clinton. I told him that I had been called to testify and asked what I should say. He told me to deny that we had ever had an affair. During the proceeding, when questions came up about my relationship to Bill, Don Barnes, his appointee and head of the commission, stopped the questioning.

7. On several occasions, I discussed with Bill Clinton the subject of inquiries by the media about our relationship. He told me to continue to deny our relationship, that if we would stick together, everything would be okay. In one conversation which occurred while Bill Clinton was running for the Democratic Presidential nomination in 1991, we were discussing media coverage of Larry Nichols’ lawsuit and the women who were alleged in the complaint in that lawsuit to have had affairs with Bill Clinton. In that context he said: “…if all the people who are named [in the Nichols lawsuit] deny it. That’s all, I mean, I expect them to look into it and interview you and everything, uh, but I just think that if everybody is on the record denying it, you got no problem.”

8. The conversations in this Declaration also refer to the tape-recorded conversations I had with Bill Clinton in 1990 and 1991. Those recordings were not altered or “doctored” in any manner.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on March 12, 1998
(signed)
Gennifer G. Flowers”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/pjones/docs/flowers031398.htm

From the Washington Post December 21, 1993.

“Clinton Tried To Derail Troopers’ Sex Allegations”

“President Clinton and other administration officials engaged in an extensive effort in recent months to prevent publication of allegations that Clinton as governor of Arkansas used his security detail to facilitate extramarital affairs, the White House acknowledged yesterday.

White House aides said Clinton had personally spoken with several Arkansas state troopers. But they denied that Clinton sought improperly to pressure the troopers not to talk to reporters and said that Clinton was merely seeking information about what false stories were being spread about him.

In a statement released last night, presidential adviser Bruce Lindsey said that Clinton spoke with the troopers after a longtime member of his security detail in Arkansas contacted him several months ago “with information that the prospects of large sums of money were being dangled before several members of his former security details for stories – regardless of whether they were true or not – to discredit the president and his family.”

Two members of Clinton’s former security detail, Roger Perry and Larry Patterson, have alleged in television interviews and in a lengthy article in the American Spectator magazine that they and other troopers helped Clinton meet women, booked hotel rooms for liaisons and brought a woman into the Arkansas Governor’s Mansion after Clinton was elected president. The men have acknowledged that they are interested in writing a book about their time with the Clintons, and are represented by one of Clinton’s Arkansas political enemies, lawyer Cliff Jackson.

The allegations forced the White House to address again an issue that has periodically plagued Clinton since last year’s campaign, when a former nightclub singer, Gennifer Flowers, alleged that she had conducted a 12-year affair with the Arkansas governor and was provided a state job to remain silent about it.”

“In the magazine article, written by conservative journalist David Brock, the two troopers are quoted as providing highly detailed accounts of Clinton’s alleged affairs with numerous women. They also make allegations about a strained relationship between Clinton and his wife, including accounts of extensive vulgarity.”

“Davis and Jackson said they were initially contacted by four troopers, including Ferguson, about arranging a book deal and publicizing allegations about Clinton.

But Ferguson and the fourth trooper, Ronnie Anderson, decided not to speak out after the White House pressured them, Jackson said. Perry, who is president of the Arkansas State Troopers Association, andPatterson have “been intimidated and threatened” over their decision to go public, Jackson said.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/pjones/stories/pj122193.htm

Disclaimer: The use of the words wicked leaks is not tied to or a reference to the book “Wicked Leaks” by Matt Bendoris.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

 

 

NY Times: How Hillary Clinton grappled with Bill Clinton’s infidelity and his accusers, Wicked Leaks will reveal truth, Hillary terrorist using violence threats or intimidation to achieve a political aim, Clintons victims cowering in fear

NY Times: How Hillary Clinton grappled with Bill Clinton’s infidelity and his accusers, Wicked Leaks will reveal truth, Hillary terrorist using violence threats or intimidation to achieve a political aim, Clintons victims cowering in fear

“Broaddrick herself told NewsMax.com last year that her home had been broken into, her pets released and her answering machine tape stolen while she and her husband were away briefly during the House impeachment probe.
“Let me tell you something. They were all over that woman,” Schippers told NewsMax.com. “And it was the type of stuff we ran into with the outfit (the Chicago mob). Intimidation just by watching her, making their presence known. … Just to let her know ‘We can do what we want.’ ””…David Schippers

“The Clintons’ “systematically abuse women and others – sexually, physically, and psychologically – in their scramble for power and wealth,” says the book’s press release.”…”The Clintons’ War on Women”

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

Wicked Leaks.

A new Citizen Wells initiative, which like Wiki Leaks will bring to the light information hidden from the public.

Most of the information revealed by Citizen Wells has been scrubbed or diminished in search engines.

Other articles and facts have become topical again and deserve to be read by a new audience of younger people and others now using the internet.

It is fitting and proper that a new NY Times article, covering for Hillary and obfuscating the truth, be highlighted in this introduction.

I will be presenting a small portion of the article at this time to prevent mass nausea and blood pressure rises.

From the NY Times October 2, 2016.

“The enduring image of Mrs. Clinton from that campaign was a “60 Minutes” interview in which she told the country she was not blindly supporting her husband out of wifely duty. “I’m not sitting here, some little woman standing by my man like Tammy Wynette,” she said.

But stand by she did, holding any pain or doubts in check as the campaign battled to keep the Clintons’ political aspirations alive.

Last week, Donald J. Trump, the Republican presidential nominee,criticized Mrs. Clinton over Mr. Clinton’s affairs and her response to them, and said he might talk more about the issue in the final weeks before the election.

That could be a treacherous strategy for Mr. Trump, given his own past infidelity and questionable treatment of women. Many voters, particularly women, might see Mrs. Clinton being blamed for her husband’s conduct.

It could also remind voters of a searing period in American history, and in Mrs. Clinton’s life.

Confronting a spouse’s unfaithfulness is painful under any circumstance. For Mrs. Clinton, it happened repeatedly and in the most public of ways, unfolding at the dawn of the 24/7 news cycle, and later in impeachment proceedings that convulsed the nation.

Outwardly, she remained stoic and defiant, defending her husband while a progression of women and well-funded conservative operatives accused Mr. Clinton of behavior unbecoming the leader of the free world.

But privately, she embraced the Clinton campaign’s aggressive strategy of counterattack: Women who claimed to have had sexual encounters with Mr. Clinton would become targets of digging and discrediting — tactics that women’s rights advocates frequently denounce.”

“Mrs. Clinton’s level of involvement in that effort, as described in interviews, internal campaign records and archives, is still the subject of debate. By some accounts, she gave the green light and was a motivating force; by others, her support was no more than tacit assent.”

Dolly Kyle Browning has known the Clintons for decades.

“Aaron, Hillary is an enabler is about the nicest thing you can say about her,” stated Kyle when asked about a statement last Friday from Donald Trump, who slammed Hillary Clinton as an “unbelievably nasty, mean enabler” who “destroyed” the lives of her husband’s mistresses and alleged victims.

Continued Kyle: “The fact of the matter is Hillary is a terrorist. I invite you to look up the definition of terrorism. It is the use of violence, threats, or intimidation to achieve a political aim. … That’s what terrorism is. It changes people’s lives by changing their decisions about what they would otherwise do. And these women who might otherwise speak up are so afraid that they won’t say anything.”

Kyle alleged that there are many other Clinton lovers and purported assault victims who would likely speak out, but who instead “are cowering in fear because of the terrorism.”

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/05/15/exclusive-clintons-alleged-ex-lover-hillary-terrorist-sex-addict-bill-told-2000-women/

From Dolly Kyle Browning, et al vs William Jefferson Clinton.

“Plaintiff Dolly Kyle Browning has been intentionally and maliciously threatened by Clinton and his agents, including Lindsey. See id. at ¶¶ 131-33. They threatened to “destroy” her if she told the media about her sexual relationship with Clinton. See id. at ¶ 131. They also warned her not to publish her book, Purposes of the Heart, which depicts that 30-year relationship. See id. In addition, Clinton, acting through Lindsey, threatened and intimidated Mrs. Browning into severely limiting her public statements about her relationship with Clinton. Id.

Most significant to the instant motion, Clinton and Lindsey also knowingly used threats and intimidation to prevent Mrs. Browning from testifying in the Paula Jones civil rights/sexual harassment lawsuit (“the Jones case”). They directed Clinton’s lawyers to draft a motion to quash her deposition subpoena, and pressured Mrs. Browning to file it with the court. See id. at ¶¶ 61-64. Mrs. Browning, a member of the Texas Bar and officer of the court, refused to comply, and was deposed in the Jones case on October 28, 1997. See id. at ¶¶ 2, 64-65. Clinton and his agents then followed through on their threats against Mrs. Browning. Among other things, they defamed her, publicly branding her a liar out to “get” the President, and knowingly circulating false and derogatory information about her character and motivations.See, e.g., id. at ¶¶ 67, 69, 71-74, 79-81.

Remarkably similar threatening tactics have been directed at other women who, like Mrs. Browning, have personal knowledge of Clinton’s misconduct and were sought as witnesses in official proceedings against Clinton. See id. at ¶ 134. Plaintiffs referred in their Amended Complaint to the threats and retaliation by Clinton and his agents against Kathleen Willey and Linda Tripp when they were called to testify in the Jones case and the Independent Counsel’s investigation of the Lewinsky affair. Indeed, the number of women who have suffered from these “Clintonian” tactics is significant. On March 11, 1999,Investor’s Business Daily reported that at least nine (9) women have now charged that Clinton “personally assaulted them or, through his ‘agents’ or ‘people,’ threatened to do them or their families physical harm.” The list includes Dolly Kyle Browning, Gennifer Flowers, Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Corbin Jones, Kathleen Willey, Monica Lewinsky, Linda Tripp, Sally Perdue, and Elizabeth Ward Gracen. “And all of them say they’re afraid for their safety so long as he remains in power.”

Because of the threats, intimidation, and retaliation directed at these women, their fear for their safety, and the enormous power and means available to Clinton and Lindsey, Plaintiffs must perpetuate the testimony of these women without delay. Their testimony will substantiate Plaintiffs’ RICO allegations, and is both competent and highly relevant to Plaintiffs’ case. As RICO witnesses against the highest officials in our government, these women are at enormous risk. Every moment of delay provides Clinton and Lindsey with additional opportunities to threaten them and/or their families, and enhances the chances that their testimony will be lost forever. Plaintiffs cannot obtain the testimony of these witnesses through the ordinary course of discovery in this case as all discovery has been stayed pending the Court’s ruling on the outstanding motions to dismiss. Plaintiffs therefore respectfully move the Court for leave to perpetuate the testimony of these witnesses or, in the alternative, to commence limited discovery to take their depositions.”

http://citizenwells.net/2016/09/08/browning-vs-clinton-plaintiffs-expedited-motion-for-leave-to-perpetuate-testimony-of-threatened-witnesses-case-no-98-1991-gennifer-flowers-juanita-broaddrick-linda-tripp-monica-lewinsky-paul/

There is much much more information available to respond to this article and the Clintons’ evil and corrupt past.

Just as with Wiki Leaks, much has been revealed and much more is to come.

Wicked Leaks.

Revealing the Clintons’ evil and corrupt past.

Most of the scrubbed articles resurrected can be viewed here.

http://citizenwells.net/

Disclaimer: The use of the words wicked leaks is not tied to or a reference to the book “Wicked Leaks” by Matt Bendoris.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hillary: “Can’t we just drone this guy?”, Sources?, Simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks, Julian Assange quotes article on Twitter, Email to Hillary: “SP memo on possible legal and nonlegal strategies re wikileaks”

Hillary: “Can’t we just drone this guy?”, Sources?, Simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks, Julian Assange quotes article on Twitter, Email to Hillary: “SP memo on possible legal and nonlegal strategies re wikileaks”

“We have more info and we will publish everything when the time is right some of these materials can get Hillary Clinton to lose the nomination,” …Julain Assange

On Hillary Clinton: “evil incarnate.”…David Schippers

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

From Wikileaks Twitter account:

To Silence Wikileaks, Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange — report

 

From True Pundit October 2, 2016.

“Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange”

“Prodded by the looming CableGate, Clinton met with staff on Tuesday November 23, 2010 shortly after 8 a.m. on Mahogany Row at the State Department to attempt to formulate a strategy to avert Assange’s plans to release an enormous batch of 250,000 secret cables, dating from 1966 to 2010. Assange had professed for months to rain the internal cables down on Clinton and President Obama. The collective fear was the context of the secret cables would hamper U.S. intelligence gathering and compromise private correspondences and intelligence shared with foreign governments and opposition leaders. Splashing such juicy details on television news shows and the front pages of major newspapers in the country was great for the media but lousy for intelligence and foreign policy. Many, including Clinton and her elected boss, expressed fear these revelations would embarrass and expose intelligence allies of the United States and set America’s already fragile foreign policy back decades.

“By its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often incomplete information,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement responding to Wikileaks’ anticipated tidal wave release of intelligence. “It is not an expression of policy, nor does it always shape final policy decisions.”

Clinton’s State Department was getting pressure from President Obama and his White House inner circle, as well as heads of state internationally, to try and cutoff Assange’s delivery of the cables and if that effort failed, then to forge a strategy to minimize the administration’s public embarrassment over the contents of the cables. Hence, Clinton’s early morning November meeting of State’s top brass who floated various proposals to stop, slow or spin the Wikileaks contamination. That is when a frustrated Clinton, sources said, at some point blurted out a controversial query.

“Can’t we just drone this guy?” Clinton openly inquired, offering a simple remedy to silence Assange and smother Wikileaks via a planned military drone strike, according to State Department sources. The statement drew laughter from the room which quickly died off when the Secretary kept talking in a terse manner, sources said. Clinton said Assange, after all, was a relatively soft target, “walking around” freely and thumbing his nose without any fear of reprisals from the United States. Clinton was upset about Assange’s previous 2010 records releases, divulging secret U.S. documents about the war in Afghanistan in July and the war in Iraq just a month earlier in October, sources said. At that time in 2010, Assange was relatively free and not living cloistered in in the embassy of Ecuador in London. Prior to 2010, Assange focused Wikileaks’ efforts on countries outside the United States but now under Clinton and Obama, Assange was hammering America with an unparalleled third sweeping Wikileaks document dump in five months. Clinton was fuming, sources said, as each State Department cable dispatched during the Obama administration was signed by her.”

“Immediately following the conclusion of the wild brainstorming session, one of Clinton’s top aides, State Department Director of Policy Planning Ann-Marie Slaughter, penned an email to Clinton, Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, and aides Huma Abebin and Jacob Sullivan at 10:29 a.m. entitled “an SP memo on possible legal and nonlegal strategies re Wikileaks.”

“Nonlegal strategies.” How did that phrasing make it into an official State Department email subject line dealing with solving Wikileaks and Assange? Why would the secretary of state and her inner circle be discussing any “nonlegal strategies” for anything whatsoever? Against anyone? Shouldn’t all the strategies discussed by the country’s top diplomat be strictly legal only? And is the email a smoking gun to confirm Clinton was actually serious about pursuing an obvious “nonlegal strategy” proposal to allegedly assassinate Assange? Numerous attempts were made to try and interview and decipher Slaughter’s choice of email wording, however, she could not be reached for comment. Insiders said Slaughter is keeping a “low profile” in Princeton, NJ until she is nominated for a position in Clinton’s cabinet if the Democrat is elected in November. Likewise, True Pundit attempted to contact Mills, Abedin, and Sullivan for their perspectives on this story. None commented on the record.

hillaryemailwikinonlegalstrategies

Slaughter’s cryptic email also contained an attached document called “SP Wikileaks doc final11.23.10.docx.” That attachment portion of Slaughter’s “nonlegal strategies” email has yet to be recovered by federal investigators and House committee investigators probing Clinton’s email practices while at State. Even Wikileaks does not have the document. Slaughter, however, shed some light on the attachment: “The result is the attached memo, which has one interesting legal approach and I think some very good suggestions about how to handle our public diplomacy.”

But did it also include details on the “nonlegal strategies” teased in the subject line?”

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Julian Assange

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Hillary Alicia Machado choice consistent with Clintons crime corruption and immigration policies, Clinton administration pushed rapid naturalization and allowing citizenship to criminals, Democrat David Schippers exposed pressure on INS for votes

Hillary Hillary Alicia Machado choice consistent with Clintons crime corruption and immigration policies, Clinton administration pushed rapid naturalization and allowing citizenship to criminals, Democrat David Schippers exposed pressure on INS for votes

“I am, you know, adamantly against illegal immigration.”…Hillary Clinton, WABC 2003

On Hillary Clinton: “evil incarnate.”…David Schippers

“The devil’s in that woman.”…Miss Emma, Clinton’s cook, governor’s mansion

 

Hillary Clinton believes that using Alicia Machado to taint Donald Trump in the eyes of women and voters is a good idea. That is because she is so used to acting like and associating with criminals and being involved in shady activities, she doesn’t think a thing of it.

For anyone paying attention this will backfire on her.

From American Action News September 28, 2016.

“Who is Alicia Machado? The Truth”

“Who is Alicia Machado and how did she become a US citizen?

As Hillary made her finals remarks in the first presidential debate, she proudly proclaimed that she stood with Trump bullying victim Alicia Machado. Personally, I find the notion of hurling insults at women (including Rosie O’Donnell) on the basis of their physical appearance distasteful.  When I heard Trump called Machado names like “Little Miss Piggy” I didn’t like it. Even though as a Miss Universe, Machado’s job was to maintain her weight and physical appearance, I will concede calling someone “Little Miss Piggy” or “Miss Housekeeping” is a little much. At the same time, time people within the pageant have claimed she was extremely difficult to deal with.

But that’s neither here nor there. After the debate, many news and media outlets such as NBC, CNN, and Inside Edition  produced “Who’s Alicia Machado?” pieces. In all of these stories, her bio went from winning Miss Universe and being bullied by Trump to becoming a US citizen. It was similar to their coverage of Barack Obama in 2008, where apparently he had nothing occur in his life between being President of the Harvard Law Review and giving a speech at the 2004 DNC. As I watched sympathetic piece after sympathetic piece, in my gut I knew there was something wrong with the name Alicia Machado. No, it was not implicit bias or racial profiling that caused me to feel this. It was an interview with Anderson Cooper.

Amazingly, overnight, Machado’s Wikipedia page was edited, so I had to do a little digging to research many of the things I had heard about her. According to Associated Press reports in January 1998, Machado was accused in court documents of driving her ex-boyfriend Juan Rodriguez Reggeti to shoot his brother-in-law, Francisco Antonio Sbert Mousko, outside the funeral of Mousko’s wife as she was being eulogized. In addition to being the victim’s wife, the dead woman was also Reggeti’s sister.

Machado was ordered to testify in court as her attorney’s claimed she was filming a soap opera. In February of 1998 the Associated Press published a report that a Venezuelan judge claimed Machado threatened to kill him after he indicted her boyfriend for attempted murder. Venezuelan beauty queen Alicia Machado threatened “to ruin my career as a judge and … kill me,” Judge Maximiliano Fuenmayor said on national television. There were also claims that Machado’s boyfriend snatched the shooting victim’s 11-year-old son, his nephew. Machado would avoid prosecution because witnesses could not be produced to testify against her. At the same time, her alibi was never corroborated by witnesses.

We don’t know if Machado is guilty of any crime, but considering all of this, Machado’s recent interview with Anderson Cooper is troubling. In contrast to many of his colleagues, Cooper apparently does his due diligence. During the interview Cooper asked Machado, “There are reports that Trump surrogates tonight have been referencing and pointing to on CNN and elsewhere about an incident in 1998 in Venezuela, where you were accused of driving a getaway car from a murder scene. You were never charged with this,” Cooper said. “The judge in the case also said you threatened to kill him after he indicted your boyfriend for the attempted murder. I just want to give you a chance to address these reports that the Trump surrogates are talking about,” Cooper continued. Machado’s response was, “You know, I have my past. Of course, everybody has a past. I’m not a saint girl. But that is not the point now.” Quite frankly, that is as perplexing as it is honest. The typical response of an innocent person when accused of being an accessory to murder would be to rebut or deny the allegations. Machado did neither; she essentially admitted her involvement in a case she was never even charged in.”

“Hillary utilizing Machado as a political prop does not surprise me. Hillary is a low character individual who is desperate for the presidency. What concerns me about this situation is how someone like Alicia Machado was ever granted US citizenship. Becoming a United States citizen is a privilege; there’s a diverse pool of applicants, ranging from hard working laborers to highly educated scientists. Many are dying for a chance to become a citizen and live out the American Dream, and yet, we grant citizenship to someone with the baggage of Machado? Granting citizenship to a person of Machado’s character devalues what it means to became a naturalized citizen. In the end, Machado is no victim. She’s a reminder of how sick and twisted the Clintons are, and a poster child for why we need immigration reform.”

http://americanactionnews.com/articles/who-is-alicia-machado-the-truth#WHkGHRoPlScYohWl.99″

From David Schippers book, “Sellout: The Inside Story of President Clinton’s Impeachment”.

“My staff and I agreed that we needed to focus on the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), which appeared to be running out of control. By the time we came to the subject, investigations by the General Accounting Office (GAO) and congressional committees had already indicated that the White House used the INS to further its political agenda. A blatant politicization of the agency took place during the 1996 presidential campaign when the White House pressured the INS into expediting its “Citizenship USA” (CUSA) program to grant citizenship to thousands of aliens that the White House counted as likely Democratic voters. To ensure maximum impact, the INS concentrated on aliens in key states — California, Florida, Illinois, New York, New Jersey, and Texas — that hold a combined 181 electoral votes, just 89 short of the total needed to win the election.

The program was placed under the direction of Vice President Al Gore. We received from the GAO a few e-mails indicating Vice President Gore’s role in the plan (which are included in Appendix A at the back of the book). He was responsible for keeping the pressure on, to make sure the aliens were pushed through by September 1, the last day to register for the presidential election.

In our investigation we uncovered a case study evidencing what is pejoratively known in political science circles as “Chicago Politics.”

Back in the early years of the twentieth century, “Hinky Dink” Kenna and “Bathouse” John Coughlin were recognized as the very models of the unsavory Chicago politician. The two once fixed an aldermanic election in Chicago’s First Ward. To do so, they imported thousands of ward heelers, friends, associates, and city workers and had them registered to vote from every building in the ward — from homes (of which there were few) to taverns and cribs (of which there were many). On Election Day the recent arrivals stopped at Hinky Dink’s tavern, picked up fifty cents, ate a free lunch, and went out to vote their consciences. Guess who won that election?

Essentially, the same tactics were used during President Clinton’s reelection in 1996. Only this time the Democrats weren’t handing out sandwiches. Instead, through CUSA, they were circumventing normal procedures for naturalizing aliens — procedures that check backgrounds and weed out criminals — and consequently they were handing out citizenship papers to questionable characters.”

“The White House wanted any applicant for citizenship to be naturalized in time to register for the November election, so the pressure on the INS was constant. On March 21 Elaine Kamarck in the Vice President’s office sent an e-mail to Farbrother saying: “THE PRESIDENT IS SICK OF THIS AND WANTS ACTION. IF NOTHING MOVES TODAY WE’LL HAVE TO TAKE SOME PRETTY DRASTIC MEASURES.” Farbrother responded, “I favor drastic measures.” If he couldn’t get what he wanted from the INS, he wrote, he would “call for heavy artillery.””

“Federal regulations require that, for an alien to obtain citizenship, his application for naturalization (citizenship) must be accompanied by a complete set of the alien’s fingerprints. The fingerprint cards are then sent to the FBI to determine if the applicant has a criminal or arrest record. The law provides that an application may be denied if the alien has a serious criminal record or if he falsely denies ever having been arrested, even if he was never convicted.

In the INS district offices, the alien applicant for naturalization cannot be scheduled for a personal interview until at least 60 days after the application is submitted. This delay is specifically intended to allow sufficient time for an FBI fingerprint check. If the check reveals an arrest record identification, the arrest report is inserted in the alien’s file prior to the interview. An arrest record does not automatically result in a denial of citizenship, but it alerts an examiner to spend additional time questioning the applicant and to request that he furnish further information.

If there is no criminal arrest record in the file prior to the interview, the examiner will assume that none exists. For that reason, the INS has always considered the FBI fingerprint check to be the only practical way of preventing violent felons, dope peddlers, and the like from obtaining citizenship. Any breakdown in the collecting, checking, and reporting of the fingerprints can cause a breakdown of the entire process.

In our investigation we developed sources inside the INS with specific knowledge of the facts who revealed that FBI arrest records that were being sent to the Chicago INS office simply were not being inserted into the aliens’ files. As a result, aliens with criminal records were being granted citizenship.

Our sources also disclosed that, just prior to the 1996 voter registration deadline, a box was discovered in the Chicago INS office containing nearly five thousand FBI arrest reports — reports that had arrived in time but had been ignored.

Later, when the office discovered that those reports had never been processed, the INS initially tried to blame the FBI, claiming that the Bureau had not provided the arrest records within the 60-day window. But the FBI had done its job in a timely manner. Then the INS tried to convince the public that the foul-up really hadn’t harmed the process much. The agency cited statistics showing that the rejection rate of 17 percent was just about what it had always been, so no harm, no foul. But the INS neglected to take into account the thousands of aliens with criminal arrest records who were not rejected, even though they would have been under the normal procedures. If the traditional process had been followed, the rejection rate in the summer of 1996 would have easily exceeded 30 percent and perhaps have been even higher.

The White House, the INS, and the Justice Department publicly denied any political motive in the CUSA program to expedite the citizenship procedure. What the United States got is undeniable:
More than 75,000 new citizens who had arrest records when they applied;

An additional 115,000 citizens whose fingerprints were unclassifiable for various technical reasons and were never resubmitted; and

Another 61,000 people who were given citizenship with no fingerprints submitted at all.
Those numbers were developed by the accounting firm of KPMG Peat Marwick as a result of an audit of the 1996 CUSA program.

What we had here was a perfect example of the Clinton-Gore administration’s overarching political philosophy: “The ends justify the means,” coupled with “win at any cost.” It was a philosophy of governance that, as our investigations into other areas proceeded, we would find repeated again and again.

When the results of the KPMG Peat Marwick audit were made public, the INS and Justice vowed to remedy the situation, root out the felons, and revoke erroneously awarded citizenship. Everyone congratulated the administration for acting so quickly — and then promptly forgot about it.”

“We received no cooperation from either the Justice Department or the INS. Instead we received nothing but complaints about not going through the proper channels, investigating old news, being partisan — if not racist — and so on. But we reasoned that if criminals were given citizenship in 1996, at least some of them had probably continued their criminal activity in the two years since. We asked the GAO — an investigative agency that works for Congress and is therefore not subject to White House or Justice Department pressures — to give us FBI arrest records related to the CUSA program. We were given unquestioned cooperation and boxes of FBI reports.

We reviewed every document in those boxes, pulling out about a hundred of the most violent or serious crimes committed by aliens prior to naturalization and documented by arrest records. I specifically excluded minor immigration crimes, tax offenses, or white-collar crimes such as driving under the influence. I asked the staff to search for drug trafficking and violent crimes such as rape and child abuse. Those are the types of crimes that are most often repeated. A child abuser tends to abuse again, and a rapist tends to rape again.

After a few days — and going through only a few of the 20 or so boxes — we had our basic 100 heinous crimes, including one criminal who was actually in jail at the time he was naturalized.

We asked the FBI if it had arrest records for crimes committed by the same aliens in this country since 1996 and sent them our one hundred profiles.

Less than a week later, the FBI sent the updated arrest records to the Justice Department. (Per an agreement between the FBI and the Justice Department, all materials requested from the Bureau must go through Justice.) But when we inquired about them, the department claimed that it hadn’t yet received the records. An hour later, however, Justice called back to say that the “misplaced” reports had been located.

Of those 100 arrest records updated by the Bureau, some 20 percent showed arrests for serious crimes after the subject was given citizenship. Based on these random results, we asked for updates on every arrest record in our 20 boxes. Our plan was to update every report, using only FBI numbers and with the FBI redacting all identifying information to address the issue of privacy concerns. If, as we anticipated, anywhere near 20 percent came back with subsequent crimes, we would then confront the Justice Department, demand the identity and address of these known criminals, and point out that they had been given citizenship illegally and were still engaged in criminal activity. Unfortunately, before we could go further, the referral from Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr arrived. Had we been given sufficient time to develop evidence and witnesses, the CUSA matter might have been included in the abuse of power impeachment article.

The 1996 arrest records are still available, and I am sure the FBI is still willing to update all of them. In the meantime, thousands of criminals are now citizens of the United States because it was assumed they would vote for Bill Clinton and Al Gore.”

Read more:

http://cis.org/BookReview-InsideStoryClintonImpeachment

From Reuters November 24, 2010.

“Concerned by North Korea’s artillery attack on a South Korean island, the 1996 beauty queen winner got muddled when tweeting for world peace via her @aliciamachado77 account.

“Tonight I want to ask you to join me in a prayer for peace, that these attacks between the Chinas do not make our situation worse,” she wrote late on Tuesday.

Her gaffe unleashed a rush of insulting posts, prompting her to go offline.”

https://web.archive.org/web/20140107091026/http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/11/24/oukoe-uk-korea-north-venezuela-idAFTRE6AN67020101124

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/