Ted Cruz FEC advisory opinion on natural born citizen status patriotic duty, Cruz born in Canada to 1 US citizen parent, Senate resolution 511 sanctioned John McCain who was born to 2 US citizen parents

Ted Cruz FEC advisory opinion on natural born citizen status patriotic duty, Cruz born in Canada to 1 US citizen parent, Senate resolution 511 sanctioned John McCain who was born to 2 US citizen parents

“Why did Obama employ Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie, to request an advisory opinion on FEC matching funds that he was not eligible for?”…Citizen Wells

“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense,  to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells

“Moore said he’s seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.”…Judge Roy Moore interview by WND



Donald Trump was quoted in the Washington Post on January 5, 2016.

“Donald Trump said in an interview that rival Ted Cruz’s Canadian birthplace was a “very precarious” issue that could make the senator from Texas vulnerable if he became the Republican presidential nominee.

“Republicans are going to have to ask themselves the question: ‘Do we want a candidate who could be tied up in court for two years?’ That’d be a big problem,” Trump said when asked about the topic. “It’d be a very precarious one for Republicans because he’d be running and the courts may take a long time to make a decision. You don’t want to be running and have that kind of thing over your head.””

Trump is correct.

This is a no brainer.

For the good of the country, the Republican Party and for Cruz himself, he should immediately request an advisory opinion from the FEC as to whether or not he is eligible for federal matching funds as a natural born citizen.

There is a precedent for doing so.

From Citizen Wells January 27, 2015.

“To be president of the US one must be a natural born citizen, not just a citizen and not a naturalized citizen.

Is Ted Cruz a natural born citizen?

Based on my understanding the answer is no.

Ted Cruz was born in Canada and had only one US citizen parent.

Is Ted Cruz a patriot?

I believe so.

For the good of the country I am requesting that Ted Cruz, at the earliest possible moment, request an advisory opinion from the FEC about his eligibility for Federal Matching funds and therefore the presidency.

The FEC will be compelled to provide an advisory opinion about whether or not he is a natural born citizen.

This will be important for two reasons.

Ted Cruz needs to know early if his efforts are worthwhile and not counterproductive.

We need a ruling on this. Every government entity that should provide guidance on the definition of natural born citizen has passed the buck, including the US Supreme Court. The courts and congress have shirked their constitutional duty.

There are 2 important instances of an advisory opinion from the FEC on matching funds.

1. Attorney Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie on behalf of Barack Obama in 2007.

From Citizen Wells January 23, 2012.



Obama, attorneys and Democrats control FEC

The devil himself could not have come up with a more devious plan.

Robert Bauer, of Perkins Coie, on February 1, 2007 requested an advisory opinion to keep Obama’s option for matching funds open. Bauer knew full well that Obama, not being a natural born citizen, was not eligible for matching funds. The FEC advisory opinion from March 1, 2007 responded in the affirmative.Ellen L. Weintraub, former staff member at Perkins Coie, was a Democrat appointee of the FEC at that time. She remained well beyond her scheduled tenure with the help of Barack Obama.
Obama, Robert Bauer, Democrats interaction with FEC timeline.
February 1,2007

Advisory Opinion Request: General Election Public Funding

From Obama attorney Robert Bauer to FEC

“This request for an Advisory Opinion is filed on behalf of Senator Barack Obama and the committee, the Obama Exploratory Committee, that he established to fund his exploration of a Presidential candidacy. The question on which he seeks the Commission’s guidance is whether, if Senator Obama becomes a candidate, he may provisionally raise funds for the general election but retain the option, upon nomination, of returning these contributions and accepting the public funds for which he would be eligible as the Democratic Party’s nominee.”

“cc: Chairman Robert Lenhard
Vice Chair David Mason
Commissioner Michael Toner
Commissioner Hans von Spakovsky
Commissioner Steven Walther
Commissioner Ellen Weintraub

Note, in the above advisory opinion request, Robert Bauer was a Perkins Coie attorney and Ellen Weintraub was a former Perkins Coie staff member.
March 1, 2007

FEC advisory opinion

From Robert D. Lenhard to Robert Bauer

“The Commission concludes that Senator Obama may solicit and receive private contributions for the 2008 presidential general election without losing his
eligibility to receive public funding if he receives his party’s nomination for President, if he (1) deposits and maintains all private contributions
designated for the general election in a separate account, (2) refrains from using these contributions for any purpose, and (3) refunds the private
contributions in full if he ultimately decides to receive public funds.””

June 19, 2008.

“Obama to Break Promise, Opt Out of Public Financing for General Election”

“In a web video to supporters — “the people who built this movement from the bottom up” — Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, announced this morning that he will not enter into the public financing system, despite a previous pledge to do so.”

“In November 2007, Obama answered “Yes” to Common Cause when asked “If you are nominated for President in 2008 and your major opponents agree to forgo private funding in the general election campaign, will you participate in the presidential public financing system?”
Obama wrote:

“In February 2007, I proposed a novel way to preserve the strength of the public financing system in the 2008 election. My plan requires both major party
candidates to agree on a fundraising truce, return excess money from donors, and stay within the public financing system for the general election.”


2. Abdul Hassan, a naturalized citizen, requested an advisory opinion in 2012.

From Citizen Wells March 11, 2013.

“From the FEC March 11, 2013.


WASHINGTON – The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit today issued its Per Curiam Order inHassan v. FEC (Case 1:11-cv-02189-EGS). The text of the Order may be found here: (http://www.fec.gov/law/litigation/hassan_ac_order2.pdf).


From Citizen Wells October 1, 2012.

“From the FEC October 1, 2012.


WASHINGTON – The United States District Court for the District of Columbia on Friday issued its Memorandum Opinion and Order in Hassan v. FEC (Case 1:11-cv-02189-EGS). The text of the Memorandum Opinion may be found here (http://www.fec.gov/law/litigation/hassan_dc_memo_opinion.pdf) and the text of the Order may be found here (http://www.fec.gov/law/litigation/hassan_dc_order2.pdf).

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is an independent regulatory agency that administers and enforces federal campaign finance laws. The FEC has jurisdiction over the financing of campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives, the U.S. Senate, the Presidency and the Vice Presidency. Established in 1975, the FEC is composed of six Commissioners who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate.


“Hassan’s challenge to the Fund Act rests on his contention
that the natural born citizen requirement has been implicitly
repealed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court need
not repeat the thorough and persuasive opinions issued by its
colleagues in at least five other jurisdictions, all of whom
determined that the natural born citizen requirement has not
been implicitly repealed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.”

“Moreover, the Supreme Court has consistently held that the distinction between natural born citizens and naturalized citizens in the context of
Presidential eligibility remains valid.”

“Because the natural born citizen requirement has not been explicitly or implicitly repealed, Hassan’s challenge to that provision, and the Fund Act’s incorporation thereof, must fail.””


This is important.

I urge you to contact Ted Cruz with this important information.


31 responses to “Ted Cruz FEC advisory opinion on natural born citizen status patriotic duty, Cruz born in Canada to 1 US citizen parent, Senate resolution 511 sanctioned John McCain who was born to 2 US citizen parents

  1. citizenwells

    “According to the US Citizenship and Immigration Services Ted Cruz was not a US citizen at birth and consequently not a natural born citizen.”…Citizen Wells

  2. citizenwells

    “Speaking late Tuesday in Sioux Center, Iowa, Cruz laughed off questions about Trump’s comment, saying he would let his campaign’s “Happy Days” tweet speak for itself.

    When pressed, Cruz turned it back to the media, saying the focus should be on substantive issues.”


    Was Cruz saying eligibility is not substantive?

  3. The Washington Post story references the Vermont Ballot Challenge and provides a link to the Rutland Herald story!

  4. citizenwells

    The Post would never link to CW because I have been so critical of them.

  5. citizenwells

    “New Gallup Poll – Americans Consider Government A Much Bigger Problem Than Guns”


  6. CW
    If both Cruz and Rubio withdrew from the Presidential race declaring that they are ineligible under the Constitution, wouldn’t that be a slap to Mr. Obama and his Presidency? Could be the best thing that one could wish for, but it won’t happen. Just a thought.




    William Jefferson, Hillary Rodham, and baby Chelsea Clinton (who looks like Webb Hubble)….are guilty of organized crime (RICO)

    There should be little doubt as to why Hillary Clinton scrubbed her emails, and it’s not because of Benghazi. Nor did Hilary Clinton want to protect herself from the idea that she exposed secrets. She is more than prepared to weather those storms, and for the most part she has.

    But the storm that she cannot weather is The Clinton Foundation.

    I received an email where Charles Krauthammer supposedly dissected how The Clinton Foundation acts as a money laundering front, and works only to enrich the Clinton family.

    According to Krauthammer, this foundation should be illegal and certainly represents a conflict of interest.

    The Clinton Foundation is “organized crime” at its finest, and we are financing it.

    Below is a summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a TAX FREE international money laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history, and the foundation provides a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes.

    All tax free and now in the pockets of the Clinton’s..

    Here’s how it works:

    1. You create a separate foreign “charity.” In this case one in Canada.

    2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did — contributing mega millions. I’m sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin’s buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).

    3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.

    4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.

    Oh, by the way, the Canadian “charity” includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted. As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. security t risk.

    5. The Clinton Foundation then spends some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Experts estimate that The Clinton Foundation has donated no more than 15 percent of the donations to charitable pursuits. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton’s lavish salaries, and lavish lifestyle, particularly travel, and virtually all tax free. In on year alone, the foundation spent over $8 million in travel expenses.

    6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world’s best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these “clerical errors” and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.

    7. Net result — foreign money, much of it from other countries, goes into the Clinton’s pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering.

    If you’re still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton’s, ask yourself these questions: Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations and countries in need?

    This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.

    Now you know why Hillary’s destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take.

    Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal, and they are Slick! Warning: They could be back in the White House in January 2017. Don’t let it happen. Remember, most people are not well informed. You must inform and educate them.
    ———————————————————————————————-Slick Willie didn’t get the name of “Slick Willie’ for nothing. These bastards belong deep under the jail…….Let’s put them there.

  9. oldsoldier79……….
    ……….with respect to the “MUFFA” video he is the very last person on this earth who should ever have a weapon of any kind in his hands. He is obviously limited with regard to his education. He seems to have about 10 words in his vocabulary, but I have to say he has Soetoro figured out, and even repeatedly refers to him correctly…….”MUFFA” har har

  10. oldsailor83…..

    I found that to be an interesting point too…..this dude looks like he just came from holding up the corner 7/11 store, but he is pretty vocal about HIS Second Amen rights to keep and bare arms…..haha

    yea….I agree …but I found that video interesting because Obama can’t even fool the street thugs he is so strongly supporting by his efforts……

    Personally, I think Mr. Hussain (whatever his damn name is) will soon find the longer he stays in the water, “the hotter the frog will get”……

  11. Veeeeeeeery Interesting !

  12. oldsoldier79……..
    ………..I pray that just one federal judge will decide that he/she has seen and heard enough about what is happening to our country, and grows a pair then proceeds to nail every one of the BASTARDS who have turned the federal government into their own personal DOMESTIC SERVICES PROVIDER, which even has professional A$$ KISSERS…..the latter being the JOINT CHIEFS. I have my doubts that any one of them could knock his way out of a WET PAPER BAG. Of course my worded expectations are only a prayer, and the likelihood of any of it happening is probably xero to zada. but in thinking about it everybody thought that Al Capone would never be imprisoned either, but alas one of HIS OWN for reasons unknown to this day decided to furnish the fed with the incriminating evidence.

  13. ……..AND….
    …….your Montana video is what Paul Harvey used to call “THE REST OF THE STORY”………..DEFINITELY PROJECTS FINALITY! …….One might add……….. WELL ILLUSTRATED………..THE PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS! har har

  14. Trump Goes BIRTHER On Ted Cruz – THIS Was His HILARIOUS Response!!

    As the video points out, Trump had previously questioned Cruz’s eligibility and then said that everything was just fine for the Canadian-born Cuban. Now he’s backtracking on THAT change of heart, and questioning it again!!

    He later reiterated his opinion to a reporter:

    Read more: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/trump-goes-birther-on-ted-cruz-his-response-is-hilarious/#ixzz3wU19uv4D

  15. ……PRAY TELL……
    ……where might we find one of the old time circuit riding “HANGING” JUDGES who plied their trade throughout the West in the days of “Billy the KID”. The PROSECUTORS knew that they didn’t have to present much of a case…………often the verdict was already in before the judge even arrived. He simply MADE THE SENTENCE LEGAL!

  16. Jonah………
    ……….I like the name they used for Trump………the “TRUMPINATOR”. har har

  17. ………given his surname one might get the idea that Trump was conceived during a EUCHRE game. har har……..and he seems to always have HIS TWO BOWERS GUARDED WITH AN ACE.!

  18. oldsoldier79


    Where did we gone wrong in permitting our government to become nothing less than a criminal enterprise of an elite few ?

    Where did we go wrong in permitting the 5th Estate media to become nothing but a useful tool to the crooks occupying the highest office in America who push their lies and untruths upon the good citizens of this country?

    Where did we go wrong in having an armed forces that knows of the evils this government is doing, yet refuse to arrest and act according to our Constitution, instead they have become nothing less than “lapdogs” to the rape of America ?

    How did we come to elect a bunch of criminals to set in our Congress and allow themselves to be blackmailed by the “man at the top” who ordered the NSA (National Security Adminstration) to not only spy on foreign officials, but to also spy on them, and get dirt on our sitting Congressmen /Senators, our SCOTUS and federal judges ?

    How did we wind up with habitual lier’s at both the State Department, and in our White House at the same time ? People who thrive on untruths and fabrications to feather their own nest? People who would not hesitate going on national television and blaming other people for their shortcomings and the dangerous game of world politics they like to play, where according to these same people, there are no rules when it comes to winning.

    How could these same evil people look the families of innocent victims in the eye and vow to get those who caused the tragedy while knowing full well it was their actions that caused the needless lose of life.

    Finally, how can any real America sit by and watch the complete destruction of his/or her nation by the same evil people we have put into office who have sworn to protect and defend our country knowing full well that is not their intent ? How can we stand by watching this without raising our voices in protest.

    Does it take movie entertainment to finally get the real truth out of our leaders ? Is it possible that a movie can tell more truth about an event that really happened than our politicians, who know not the truth ?

    It’s time for some real honest change in this country my friends if we ever expect to survive and regain our rightful place in this world.

    Perhaps this movie, “13 Hours” will be a good place to start….then we need to turn the screws on those who betrayed and abandon our fellow citizens i a foreign land to die a horrible death in order to further the personal ambitions of worthless political figures who are now leading this nation down a path of no return…..

  19. citizenwells

    From Attorney Mario Apuzzo:


    Bootstrapping a person to be a natural born citizen by arguing that that person is not a “naturalized” citizen of the United States under some self-serving definition of “naturalization” is a fallacious argument. In other words, establishing that a person was a citizen of the United States at birth and not after birth does not prove that one is a natural born citizen.

    There are only two classes of U.S. citizens in the Constitution, natural born citizens and citizens of the United States. All natural born citizens of the United States are citizens of the United States, but not all citizens of the United States are natural born citizens of the United States. Of the citizens of the United States, only a child born in the country to parents who were its citizens is a natural born citizens. Minor v. Happersett (1875). All the rest of the citizens of the United States, regardless of whether the status was obtained by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment, naturalization Act of Congress, or treaty, are citizens of the Untied States, but not natural born citizens.

    So, your argument that one, like Ted Cruz (born in Canada, presumably to a U.S. citizen mother and a non-U.S. citizen father), satisfying only a naturalization Act of Congress, is a natural born citizen. Whether that person becomes a citizen of the United States at birth or after birth, in both cases the person would have been naturalized by Congress under its Article I, Section 8, Section 4 naturalization powers to be a citizen of the United States. That the person did not have to go through some naturalization process after birth does not negate the simple fact that it was only through a naturalization Act of Congress that the person became a citizen of the United States and that without such Act, under both English common law that defined a natural-born subject of Great Britain and American national common law that defines a natural born citizen of the United States, the person would be an alien at birth and need to naturalize thereafter. Being naturalized at birth and being called only a “citizen of the United States” by the very Act, that person is not and cannot be a natural born citizen. The natural born citizen clause is a constitutional national security requirement. Hence, that person, like Barack Obama, Marco Rubio, and Bobby Jindal, being neither “a natural born Citizen, [n]or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, is disqualified by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 from being President and Commander in Chief of the Military.”


  20. CitizenWells,
    Oh my, how lawyers can twist things. See above

    ……..Of the citizens of the United States, only a child born in the country to parents who were its citizens is a natural born citizens. Minor v. Happersett (1875)……

    Actually, that is from the majority opinion from that case. However, it was taken from a larger paragraph, and ultimately out of context. The majority opinion stated that

    “”new citizens may be born or they may be created by naturalization” and that the Constitution “does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens.” Under the common law, according to the court, “it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”[12]

    ….So…..this means that no one doubts child born on soil of two citizen parents, is a natural born Citizen. There is no doubt.

    Unfortunately the narrative doesn’t end there.

    “Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts…….”

    So, there are other classes that may be citizens at birth. However, they NEVER determined or stated that these were NOT Natural born Citizens, or EVEN that they were citizens. Therefore, the question of the Barack Obama’s, and the Ted Cruz’s, and the Marco Rubio as Citizens is now well accepted. This does not mean that they are Natural Born Citizens as determined by the Constitution, and it doesn’t mean they aren’t either. I believe that the ruling in Minor vs Happersett DOES distinguish by listing what is NBC in the first statement. Democrats and the media disagree with my interpretation, that it follows Vattel’s–Law of Nations description.

    I don’t believe you can be a dual citizen and NBC, it’s a security issue. Ted Cruz DID reject his claim on Canadian citizenship when he became 18. I have no idea about Marco Rubio’s dual citizenship. I suspect that Obama claimed to be an Indonesian or Kenyan well into adulthood.


  21. Pete……..
    ……….since Cruz saw fit to forfeit his Canadian citizenship AFTER THE FACT, seems to say that he IS NOT an NBC. As I see it he is a NATURALISED CITIZEN, and as such falls into exactly the same category as Arnold Scwartzenegger, and as such cannot legally be elected to POTUS. They both are simply NATURALISED CITIZENS!

  22. Today I timely filed with the Illinois State Board of Elections Objections to the Statements of Candidacy for Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio for the Republican Primary on March 15. The Statement requires the candidate to certify that he(she) is legally qualified to serve in the office they seek. State instructions refer to the qualification of natural born citizen for Presidential candidates. The objection asks the State Board to protect the voters from unqualified and illegal candidates. Attorney Mario Apuzzo’s November 29, 2015 opinion is included as an Exhibit.
    Illinois is one of our most corrupt States, so I have very low expectations that a positive outcome will evolve. But I felt a duty as a citizen to do something rather than nothing.

  23. oldsoldier79

    The basic question that caused a firestorm 8 years ago…must now be ask and answered…..by doing so, it will convict OBAMA of FRAUD, TREASON, and many other serious acts against our nation.

    This NBC problem cannot be allowed to fester and be ignored as it was 8 years ago…….if it is, then we can kiss America goodbye.

    We will know for sure then that we do not have, and most likely never had, a Constitution Republic.

  24. oldsoldier79





    Hosted by Fred Smart and Dr. Warren. Special Guest: Vietnam Veteran, Mr. Edwin Crosby III, from New York.

  25. Watching FOX, panel is squirming over Cruz’s eligibility, and NBC.

    They are in a panic!

  26. Bob Strauss………..
    ……….if Cruzes eligibility question picks up enough steam it is going to carry over into the Rubio campaign, and if enough people demand the documentation both may find themselves obliged to put their CERTIFIED BCs on display. This simple act may force Obama to FORGE another BC. I would love to see him confronted by COURT ORDER to produce an ORIGINAL Hawaii BC. It should look exactly like those of the twins, and that is the bottom line. All the other bullshi# that Soetoro has tried to make the public believe is GENUINE BCs, which in reality are ALL FORGERIES. This is because simple reasoning tells us the TRUTH, especially to those of us who have had contacts with various Boards of Health, who up to a point operate similarly. At the time Soetoro was allegedly born in Hawaii the person who was born in the 1960s received a PHOTOSTATIC COPY this is WHITE lettering upon a black background. Anything else is PHONEY BALONEY. If he can’t supply such a copy then it is probable that no original exists. from which the copy would be made.

  27. oldsoldier79

    Study carefully your DD214 and if you see in block 11c (Reason and Authority) the letters SPN then accompanied by one of these numbers, you will know why you can’t get service at the VA….this is the biggest fraud I have ever heard of being conducted against our returning veterans….and it’s now all done in complete secrecy….thanks to our government.
    Secret SPN Department of Defence Code Numbers and their meaning:
    Military Separation Codes — Numeric Codes

    Hidden on practically every veteran’s DD-214 discharge papers are secret code letters and numbers called Separation Program Numbers (SPN numbers) that might make obtaining veterans benefits difficult if not impossible. Here are these secret numeric codes that may make a difference in your future.

    These codes are contained in your military records and may be annotated on various military separation documents. These codes are subject to change, and the Department of Defense will no longer allow the military services to release the meanings of these codes to the general public.

    The below definitions were obtained before this prohibition went into effect.

    201 – Enlisted Personnel – Expiration of term of service (includes personnel on ADT as initial trainees)
    21L – Enlisted Personnel – Separation for good & sufficient reason when determined by secretarial authority
    21T – Enlisted Personnel – Release of REP 63 trainees due to emergency conditions. (Does not apply to active duty.)
    21U – Separation for failure to demonstrate adequate potential for promotion
    202 – Expiration of term of enlistment
    203 – Expiration of term of active obligated service
    205 – Release from active & transferred to reserve
    209 – Release from Active Duty within 3 mos of expiration of USN service
    210 – Separation for failure to demonstrate adequate potential for promotion
    212 – Honorable wartime service subsequent to desertion
    213 – Discharge for retirement as an officer
    214 – To accept commission as an officer in the Army, or to accept recall to active duty as an Army Reserve officer
    215 – To accept appointment as warrant officer in the Army or to accept recall to active duty as Army Reserve warrant officer
    217 – To accept commission or appointment in the Armed Forces of the United States (other than Army)
    219 – Erroneous induction
    220 – Marriage, female only
    221 – Pregnancy
    222 – Parenthood
    225 – Minority/under age
    226 – Dependency
    227 – Hardship
    229 – Sole surviving son and surviving family members
    230 – Retirement after 20 years but less than 30 years active federal service
    231 – Retirement after 30 years active federal service
    238 – Service retirement in lieu of other administrative action
    239 – Surviving family members
    240 – Unconditional resignation of enlisted personnel serving on unspecified enlistment
    241 – Resignation of enlisted personnel on unspecified enlistment in lieu of resignation for misconduct or inefficiency
    242 – Resignation of enlisted personnel on unspecified enlistment for the good of the service
    243 – Resignation of enlisted personnel on unspecified enlistment in lieu of board of action when based on unfitness
    244 – Resignation of enlisted personnel on unspecified enlistment in lieu of board action when based on unsuitability
    245 – Resignation of enlisted personnel on unspecified enlistment in lieu of separation for disloyalty or subversion
    246 – Discharge for the good of the service
    247 – Unsuitability, multiple reasons
    248 – Unsuitability
    249 – Resignation (Class II homosexual) of personnel on unspecified enlistment
    250 – Punitive discharge. Class I homosexual – general court martial
    251 – Punitive discharge. Class I homosexual – general court martial
    252 – Punitive discharge. Class I homosexual – general or special court martial
    253 – Homosexual – board action
    255 – Retirement in lieu of discharge under AR 635-89 (homosexuality). Rescinded
    255 – Punitive discharge. Class II homosexual – general court martial
    256 – Homosexual, acceptance of discharge in lieu of board action
    257 – Unfitness, homosexual acts
    258 – Unfitness, ineptitude
    258 – Unfitness, multiple reasons
    260 – Unsuitability, inaptitude
    261 – Inaptitude — illiterate
    261 – Psychiatric or psychoneurotic disorder
    262 – Behavioral disorder, Bedwetter
    263 – Bedwetter
    264 – Unsuitability, character and behavioral disorders
    265 – Unsuitability, character disorder
    270 – Placed on temporary disability retired list
    270 – Release from EAD and revert to retired list at ETS
    271 – Permanently retired by reason of physical disability
    273 – Physical disability with entitlement to receive severance pay
    274 – Physical disability resulting from international misconduct or willful neglect or incurred during period of unauthorized absence. Not entitled to severance pay
    276 – Released from EAD & revert to retired list prior to ETS
    277 – Physical disability, EPTS (existing prior to service), established by medical board. Discharged by reason of physical disability upon application by individual. Not entitled to severance pay
    278 – Physical disability, EPTS, established by physical evaluation board proceedings. Not entitled to severance pay
    279 – Release from EAD & revert to retired list at ETS
    28B – Unfitness, frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities
    28E – Financial irresponsibility
    28F – Established pattern for showing dishonorable failure to pay just debts
    28G – Unfitness, an established pattern for showing dishonorable failure to contribute adequate support to dependents or failure to comply with order, decrees, or judgment of a civil court concerning support of dependents
    280 – Misconduct/fraudulent entry into the Army (enlistee not revealing criminal record)
    281 – Desertion, trial barred by 10 U.S.C. 843 (ART. 43, U.C.M.J.). Rescinded
    281 – Unsanitary habits
    282 – Misconduct/prolonged unauthorized absence for more than one year desertion
    283 – Misconduct/AWOL trial waived or deemed inadvisable
    284 – Misconduct/convicted or adjudged a juvenile offender by a civil court during current term of active military service
    285 – Initially adjudged a juvenile offender by a civil court during current term of active military service. Rescinded.
    290 – Desertion (court martial)
    293 – Other than desertion (court martial)
    293 – General court martial
    294 – Special court martial
    311 – Alien without legal residence in the United States
    312 – Separation of members of Reserve components on active duty who, due to age, would be precluded from attaining eligibility pay as provided by 10 USC 1331.1337
    313 – To immediately enlist or reenlist
    314 – Importance to national health, safety or interest
    316 – Release, lack of jurisdiction
    318 – Conscientious objection
    319 – Erroneous enlistment
    320 – To accept employment law enforcement agency
    333 – Discharge of Cuban volunteers upon completion of specified training. Rescinded.
    344 – Release of Cuban volunteers upon completion of specified training. Rescinded.
    367 – Aggressive reaction
    370 – Released from EAD by reason of physical disability & revert to inactive status for the purpose of retirement under Title 10. USC Sections 1331 – 1337, in lieu of discharge with entitlement to receive severance pay
    375 – Discharge because of not meeting medical fitness standards at time of enlistment
    376 – Release from military Control (void Inductions) because of not meeting medical fitness standards at time of induction
    377 – Non – fulfillment of enlistment commitment
    38A – Desertion/trial deemed inadvisable (WW2) Rescinded
    38B – Desertion/trial deemed inadvisable (peacetime desertion) Rescinded
    38C – Desertion/trial deemed inadvisable (Korean War). Rescinded
    380 – Desertion/trial barred by 10 USC Section 834 (Art 34 UCMJ). Rescinded
    351 – Desertion/trial deemed inadvisable (Spanish – American War/ WWII). Rescinded
    383 – Criminalism
    41A – Apathy, lack of interest
    41C – To accept a teaching position
    41D – Discharge of enlisted personnel on unspecified enlistment who completed 20 years active federal service, do not submit application for retirement: commander determines discharge will be in best interest of the government
    41E – Obesity
    411 – Early separation of overseas returnee
    412 – Enlisted members of medical holding detachments or units who, upon completion of hospitalization, do not intend to immediately enlist or reenlistment in the regular Army
    413 – To enter or return to college, university, or equivalent institution
    414 – To accept or return to employment of a seasonal nature
    415 – Early release of inductees who have served on active duty prior their present tour of duty
    416 – Physical disqualification for duty in MOS
    418 – Discharge of enlisted personnel in unspecified enlistment who complete 30 years active federal service and do not submit application for retirement
    419 – Discharge of enlisted personnel on unspecified enlistment over 55 years of rage who have completed 20 years active federal service & do not submit application for retirement
    420 – Discharge or release of individuals with less than 3 months remaining to serve who fail to continue as students (academic failure) at service academies
    421 – Early release at Christmas will be issued as appropriate by Army & has been Included in separation edit table. Rescinded
    422 – Early release at original ETS of enlisted personnel who have executed a voluntary extension. Rescinded
    423 – Early release after original ETS of personnel serving on voluntary extension. Rescinded
    424 – Separation at ETS after completing a period of voluntary extension. Rescinded
    425 – Discharge (Inductees) to enlist ar Warrant Officer Flight Training
    426 – Discharge (inductees) to enlist to attend critical MOS school
    427 – Discharge (inductees) to enlist for Officer Candidate School
    420 – Discharge for failure to complete Officer Candidate. School
    429 – Discharged because of not meeting medical fitness standards for Flight training
    430 – Early separation of personnel denied reenlistment under Qualitative Management Program
    431 – Reduction in authorized strength
    432 – Early release to serve 1 year in an ARNG or USAR unit
    433 – Involuntary release of personnel on compassionate assignment
    434 – Early release of AUS & first team RA Personnel – phase down release programs (Early – out from V’nam)
    436 – Reduction In strength a USASA option/First Team
    437 – AUS, RA First Team, exempted from 90 day suspension of Early Release Program for reasons for intolerable personal problems
    440 – Separation for concealment of serious arrest record
    46A – Unsuitability, apathy, defective attitudes & inability to extend effort constructively
    46B Sexual deviate
    46C – Apathy/obesity
    460 – Emotional instability reaction
    461 – Inadequate personality
    463 – Paranoid personality
    464 – Schizoid personality
    469 – Unsuitability
    480 – Personality disorder
    482 – Desertion/trial barred by 10, USC, Sec. 843 (Art 43 UCMJ) Rescinded
    488 – Unsuitability (general discharge separation)
    489 – Military Personnel Security Program (disloyal or subversive)
    500 – Resignation – hardship
    501 – Resignation – national health, safety, or interest
    502 – Resignation – completion of required service
    503 – Resignation – enlistment in the regular Army – regular officer
    504 – Resignation – withdrawal of ecclesiastical endorsement
    505 – Resignation – serving under a suspended sentence or dismissal
    508 – Resignation – to attend school
    510 – Resignation – Interest of national security (in lieu of elimination)
    51B – Resignation – In lieu of elimination because of unfitness or unacceptable conduct
    522 – Resignation in lieu of elimination because of conduct triable by court martial or in lieu thereof
    524 – Resignation – unqualified other miscellaneous reasons
    528 – Resignation – marriage
    529 – Resignation – pregnancy
    530 – Resignation – parenthood (minor children)
    536 – Voluntary discharge substandard performance of duty
    539 – Voluntary discharge – termination of RA or AUS warrant to retire commissioned status
    545 – Voluntary discharge – failure of selection for permanent promotion (commissioned officers)
    546 – Involuntary discharge a failure of selection for permanent promotion (warrant officer)
    550 – Involuntary discharge – reasons as specified by HDQA
    551 – Involuntary discharge – administrative discharge GCM
    554 – Dismissal – General court martial
    555 – Involuntary discharge – failure to complete basic, Company officer ar associate company officer course – USAR officers
    556 – Failure to complete basic, company officer or associate company officer course – ARNGUS officers
    558 – Voluntary discharge – conscientious objection
    586 – Involuntary discharge – for reasons involving board action or in lieu thereof (homosexuality),
    588 – Involuntary discharge – reasons involving board action, or in lieu thereof – unfitness or unacceptable conduct
    589 – Voluntary discharge – reasons involving board action or in lieu thereof, due to substandard performance of duty
    590 – Involuntary discharge – interest of national security
    595 – Involuntary discharge pregnancy
    596 – Involuntary discharge – parenthood (minor children)
    597 – Voluntary discharge – administrative
    599 – Voluntary REFRAD – lack of jurisdiction
    600 – Voluntary REFRAD – to enlist an regular Army
    601 – Voluntary REFRAD – to enlist in regular Army for purpose of retirement
    602 – Voluntary REFRAD – national health, safety, or interest
    603 – Involuntary REFRAD – due to disapproval of request for extension of service
    604 – Voluntary REFRAD – hardship
    606 – Voluntary REFRAD – dual status officer to revert to regular Warrant Officer
    609 – Voluntary REFRAD – to attend school or accept a teaching position
    610 – Voluntary REFRAD – marriage
    611 – Voluntary REFRAD – expiration of the duty commitment voluntarily serving on active duty
    612 – Voluntary REFRAD – expiration active duty commitment involuntary serving on active duty
    616 – Voluntary REFRAD – selection for entrance to a service academy
    618 – Voluntary REFRAD – In lieu of serving in lower grade than reserve grad
    619 – Voluntary REFRAD – by request includes MC & DC officers
    620 – Voluntary REFRAD – interde part mental transfer of other than medical officers
    621 – Voluntary REFRAD – in lieu of unqualified resignation
    623 – Voluntary REFRAD – interdepartmental transfer of medical officers
    624 – Voluntary REFRAD – release from ADT to enter on 24 months active duty
    625 – Voluntary REFRAD – annual screening, voluntary release prior to 90th day subsequent to receipt of notification
    627 – Involuntary REFRAD – maximum age
    631 – Involuntary REFRAD – failure of selector for permanent reserve promotion (discharged)
    632 – Involuntary REFRAD – failure of selection for permanent reserve promotion (commission retained)
    633 – Involuntary REFRAD – failures of selection for promotion, temporary
    640 – Involuntary REFRAD – commissioned officer under sentence of dismissal & warrant officer discharge awaiting appellate review
    644 – Voluntary & Involuntary REFRAD – convenience of government or as specified by Secretary of the Army
    645 – Involuntary REFRAD – annual screening, release on 90th day subsequent to receipt of notification
    646 – Involuntary REFRAD – maximum service, warrant officers
    647 – Involuntary REFRAD – maximum service, commissioned officers
    648 – Involuntary REFRAD – completion of prescribed years of service
    649 – Involuntary REFRAD – withdrawal of ecclesiastical endorsement
    650 – Involuntary REFRAD – physically disqualified upon order to active duty
    651 – Involuntary REFRAD – release of reserve unit & return to reserve status
    652 – Involuntary REFRAD a release of unit of NG or NG(US) & return to state control
    655 – Involuntary REFRAD – revert to retired list, not by reason of physical disability
    657 – Involuntary REFRAD – physical disability. Revert to inactive status for purpose of retirement under Chapter 67. 10 USC in lieu of discharge with entitlement to receive disability severance pay
    660 – Physical disability discharge – entitlement to severance pay
    661 – Physical disability discharge – disability resulting from intentional misconduct or willful neglect or incurred during a period of unauthorized absence. Not entitled to receive disability severance pay
    662 – Physical disability discharge – EPTS, established by physical evaluation board. Not entitled to disability severance pay
    668 – Dropped from rolls – AWOL conviction & confinement by civil authorities
    669 – Dropped from rolls – AWOL desertion
    672 – Involuntary REFRAD – medical service personnel who receive unfavorable background investigation and/or National Agency Check
    681 – Voluntary REFRAD – to accept employment with a legally established law enforcement agency
    685 – Resignation – failure to meet medical fitness standards at time of appointment
    686 – Involuntary discharge – failure to resign under Chapter 16 – AR 535 – 120. when determined to be in the best interest of the government and the individual
    689 – Voluntary REFRAD – reduction in strength, voluntary release prior to 90th day subsequent to receipt of notification
    690 – Involuntary REFRAD – reduction in strength. release on 90th day subsequent to receipt of notification
    70A – mandatory retirement – 35 years service/five years In grade. Regular army major general
    70B – Mandatory retirement – age 62, regular army major general
    70C – Mandatory retirement 60, regular Army mayor general whose retirement has been deferred
    70D – Mandatory retirement – age 64, regular Army major general whose retirement has been deferred & each permanent professor and the registrar of the US Military Academy
    70E – Mandatory retirement – 30 years service/five years in grade, regular army brigadier general
    70F – Mandatory retirement 30 years of service/five years In grade, regular colonels
    70G – Mandatory retirement – 28 years service. Regular Lt. Colonels
    70J – Mandatory retirement – age 60, regular commissioned officer below major general
    70K – Mandatory retirement – more than 30 years active service, professors US military Academy
    70L – mandatory retirement – 30 years of more active service, regular warrant officers
    70M – Mandatory retirement – age 62 regular warrant officers
    701 – Enlisted separation – early release of personnel assigned to installations or units scheduled for inactivation, permanent change of station, or demobilization
    741 – Mandatory retirement – failure of selection for promotion, established retirement date, commissioned officer
    742 – Mandatory retirement – failure of selection for promotion, estab’d retirement date. warrant officer
    743 – Enlisted separation – early release of personnel from release of unit of the ARNG or the ARNGUS from active federal service & return to state control
    744 – Mandatory retirement – failure of selection for promotion, early retirement date, commissioned officer
    745 – Mandatory retirement – failure of selection for promotion. early retirement date, warrant officers
    747 – Mandatory retirement – failure of selection for promotion, retained for retirement, commissioned officer
    748 – Mandatory retirement – failure of selection for promotion, retained for retirement, warrant officer
    749 – Enlisted separation – early release of Puerto Rican personnel who will to qualify for training
    753 – Enlisted separation – early release of reserve personnel upon release of reserve units
    764 – Enlisted separation – release of REP 63 trainees upon completion of MOS training
    77E – Mandatory retirement – surplus In grade after 30 years service. Removal from acting list (regular Army)
    77J – Voluntary retirement – placement on retired list at age 60
    77M – Mandatory retirement – permanent retirement by reason by physical disability
    77N – Mandatory retirement – paced on temporary mandatory solemnity retired list
    77P – Voluntary retirement in lieu of or as a result of elimination board proceedings. Regular Army & reserve commissioned officers and Warrant officers
    77C – andatory retirement – temporary disability retirement in lieu of or as a result of elimination proceedings
    77R – Mandatory retirement – permanent disability retirement in lieu of or as a result or elimination proceedings
    77S – Voluntary retirement a regular Army & reserve commissioned officers
    77T – Voluntary retirement – regular Army and reserve warrant officer
    77U – Voluntary retirement – regular Army commissioned officers with 30 or more years of service
    77V – Voluntary retirement – enlisted personnel, voluntarily retired as commissioned officer
    77W – Voluntary retirement – enlisted personnel, voluntarily retired as a warrant officer
    77X – Voluntary retirement a warrant officer voluntarily retired as a commissioned officer
    77Y – Mandatory retirement – retirement a director of music, USMA, as the President may direct
    77Z – Mandatory retirement – regular Army commissioned officers with World War 1 service
    771 – Mandatory retirement – commissioned officers, unfitness or substandard performance of duty
    772 – Mandatory retirement – warrant officers, unfitness or sub – standard performance of duty
    78A – Mandatory retirement – formerly retired other than for disability who while on active duty incurred a disability of at least 30%
    78B – Mandatory retirement a formerly retired for disability who where on active duty suffered aggravation of disability for which he was formerly retired
    79A – Voluntary REFRAD – as USAR warrant officer (aviator) to accept USAR commission (aviator) with concurrent active duty
    79B – Resignation – as RA a WO (aviator) to accept USAR commission (aviator) with concurrent active duty
    941 – Dropped from rolls (as deserter)
    942 – Dropped from rolls (as military prisoner)
    943 – Dropped From rolls (as missing or captured)
    944 – Battle casualty
    945 – Death (non – battle – resulting from disease)
    940 – Death (non – battle – resulting From other than disease)
    947 – (Current term of service voided as fraudulent enlisted, while AWOL from prior service
    94B – To enter US military Academy
    949 – To enter any area of the service academies (other than USMA)
    971 – Erroneously reported as returned from dropped from rolls as a deserter (previously reports under transaction GA)
    972 – Erroneously reported as restored to duty from dropped from rolls of military prisoner previously reported under transaction code GB)
    973 – Erroneously reported as returned from dropped from rolls or missing or captured (previously reported under transaction code GC)
    976 – Minority. Void enlistment or induction – enlisted personnel


  28. Cruz, Rubio Presidential Eligibility Challenged In FL, VT, and MD!
    January 7, 2016 Dianne Marshall


  29. Attorney Taitz gives an interview to US News and World Report on lack of eligibility of Ted Cruz for the US Presidency

    Posted on | January 6, 2016


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s