H. Brooke Paige V Vermont, May 15, 2014, Obama natural born citizen challenge, US Supreme Court, Courts and states abrogated duties, Judge Moore Circuit court should have granted the petition for a writ of mandamus

H. Brooke Paige V Vermont, May 15, 2014, Obama natural born citizen challenge, US Supreme Court, Courts and states abrogated duties, Judge Moore Circuit court should have granted the petition for a writ of mandamus


“Moore said he’s seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.”…Judge Roy Moore interview by WND

“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the
constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no
rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be
inspected by him?”… Marbury versus Madison

“Regardless of how this plays out, we have ensconced in writing, on the internet and available for other legal reference and quotation, a document with well
researched dissenting opinions by the AL Chief Justice Moore and Justice Parker regarding the duties and responsibilities of state election officials.
Perhaps just as important is the mention of documentation provided by the Arpaio Zullo investigation raising serious questions about Obama birth
certificates.”…Citizen Wells, March 23 2014

Thursday, May 15, 2014, the US Supreme Court will decide whether or not they will take on the appeal from the Vermont courts of H. Brooke Paige in Paige V Vermont. A challenge of Barack Obama’s natural born citizen status.

The SCOTUS should have clarified what a natural born citizen is in 2008 when Obama was first challenged.

Sadly they did not and since thrn have continued to abrogate their responsibilities.

Sadly again I expect them to pass the buck.

From H. Brooke Paige April 24, 2014.


Current “scoop” at: http://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx  docket
13-1076 additional information appears at:
https://certpool.com/dockets/13-1076 where the case will be shown as
scheduled for conference when a date is set (no sooner than 14 days after
date set for response).

The State filed a response waver March 26th, if the case passes muster in
the conference, SCOTUS would request that the State file a response – in
the absence of which the case would proceed on the merits outlined in my

Another Vermont SCOTUS case just after mine – Daniel Brown v Vermont,
State filed response waver on was received on April 4th with the case
“distributed” on April 16th for the conference on May 2nd.
https://certpool.com/dockets/13-1113, the conference schedule is found at:

I suspect that SCOTUS is awaiting “candidate Obama’s” response
(required by April 9th) before scheduling the case for conference. All
cases are considered in conference.

For now patience seems in order – the conference review is the
“gatekeeper” for SCOTUS cases – the “rule of four” decides which cases
will proceed – possibly on the May 22 or 29

Thank You for Your Continued Interest,


AL Chief Justice Roy Moore in the recent Alabama Supreme Court ruling stated:

“Although the plaintiffs’ request for relief is moot as to the legality, conduct, and results of the 2012 election, under the “capable of repetition, yet evading review” exception to mootness, the circuit court, in my view, should have granted the petition for a writ of mandamus to the extent of ordering
the Secretary of State to implement the natural-born-citizen requirement of the presidential-qualifications clause in future elections.

Furthermore, I believe the circuit court should have granted the petition for a writ of mandamus to order the Secretary of State to investigate the qualifications of those candidates who appeared on the 2012 general-election ballot for President of the United States, a duty that existed at the time this petition was filed and the object of the relief requested. Although the removal of a President-elect or a President who has taken the oath of office is within the breast of Congress, the determination of the eligibility of the 2012 presidential candidates before the casting of the electoral votes is a state function.

This matter is of great constitutional significance in regard to the highest office in our land. Should he who was elected to the presidency be determined to be ineligible, the remedy of impeachment is available through the United States Congress, and the plaintiffs in this case, McInnish and Goode, can pursue this remedy through their representatives in Congress.

For the above-stated reasons, I dissent from this Court’s decision to affirm the judgment of the circuit court dismissing this action on the motion of the Secretary of State.”


30 responses to “H. Brooke Paige V Vermont, May 15, 2014, Obama natural born citizen challenge, US Supreme Court, Courts and states abrogated duties, Judge Moore Circuit court should have granted the petition for a writ of mandamus

  1. HOPE SPRINGS ETERNAL – May 15, 2014 !


    Thanks for keeping your followers up-to-date on the proceedings. There are several positive outcomes that could result: 1 – BIO Requested, where the court request the opposing counsel to file a “brief in opposition”, 2 – Rescheduled, where one or more of the Justices feel they need more time to consider the Writ, 3 – CVSG where the Court “Call(s) for the View of the Solicitor General” or 4 – Writ of Certiorari Granted. Of course there is always “Denied”, however this still allows for our filing for reconsideration, but hopefully that will be unnecessary.

    I would like to think the previous cases relating to the question of the definition of a “natural born Citizen” have been “complicated” with issues relating to the validity of the birth documents, identity and citizenship questions; whereas this case relies on one issue alone the “nbC” definition. No other issues are in contention. Hawaiian birth is not an issue, mother’s citizenship is not an issue – the only issue is “was Barack Hussein Obama Sr.’s British Citizenship (subjecthood) conveyed to his son at birth under the British Laws in force at the time and if so does said British subjecthood act as a bar to his son also being a “natural born Citizen” of the United States under the conditions contemplated by the Founders and Framers of the United States Constitution when it was written in 1787 and ratified in 1788-1789?

    Wells, I know that many of your followers here at “Citizen Wells” are skeptical of the fair-mindedness and wisdom of our SCOTUS Justices – I, on the other hand, look to the same (divine) “invisible hand” that guided the Founders and Framers to create our Constitution to move today’s Court to reach the definition intended by the Framers and placed in our Constitution to protect their young nation (and our’s) from foreign influence and intrigue!
    H. Brooke Paige
    Washington, Vermont

  2. citizenwells

    Thanks Mr. Paige.
    God bless.

  3. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/05/stolen-police-hummer-used-in-smash-and-grab-crimes-in-rural-missouri/#disqus_thread

    This is real close to home! 🙂

    It has been said that who took the hummer has to know this type! It has no key! WE shall see!

    When they catch the person or persons “The Daily Journal” has MUG SHOTS of all that commits any kind of crime. Right now they are still working on April mug shots.

    I call The Daily Journal the son of The St. Louis Post Dispatch and the mother of Washington University! 🙂 They are all a Liberal/Democrat cesspools!

    I better shut up now before I say to Much! I hate delays! BUT………Justice is coming!

  4. oldsailor81

    In the last couple of months it has become very clear that the levels of the crookedry in the American court system has begun to permeate a few of the Superior Courts across the US. This leads me to believe that soon our STATE LEVEL courts will ALL be on a par with the Federal courts. There will NEVER be any judge who will venture to rule against Soetoro. Everybody is so damned scared of a PLAYGROUND BULLY, whose very words make them tremble in their shoes. …..but when the playground bully finds himself up against another bully who is bigger than he is BULLY #1 will run crying for his MOMMY.

  5. oldsailor81

    I believe that same logic is applicable to the SCOTUS as well, except in the case of the SCOTUS, it will be a MASS of WE THE PEOPLE, who they will find camped upon their doorstep……….at which point they too will be trembling in their boots………..with good reason!

  6. oldsailor81

    With regard to home ownership, I foresee a probability the OVERALL home ownership will plummet to somewhere around 15%………..and guess who will be the new owners…….you guessed right……..either the city,the county,the state, or the FED will own everything. All courts will be kangaroo courts,and all property will be stolen from it’s rightful owners by virtue of EMINENT DOMAIN. When all of the lower courts are totally corrupt, the legal theft will begin in earnest.

  7. oldsailor81

    Goodnight all Have a great day tomorrow.

  8. bob strauss

  9. bob strauss

    Doug Vogt: The Hawaii birth certificate numbers implicate the named forgers…. Nancy Pelosi will hang…

  10. Good Morning CW, et. al. I see that Rush Limbaugh won the Children’s Choice Award for best author.

    Drudge ^

  11. citizenwells

    Good morning Zach, et al.

  12. From >>> December 13, 2013

    “Zullo also denounced Doug Vogt’s assertions regarding the purported Obama birth certificate forger … .”


    Go to 6:18

  13. citizenwells

    From Nesara Network this AM:

    […] 2008 when he destroyed Larry Sinclair’s momentum. Here are 2 articles that you may want to post: https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/09/01/obama-bidens-lobbyists-corruption-joe-biden-hunter-bide…excerpt: What do Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Joe Biden, Attorney General Beau Biden and […]


  14. far left lib nut job

    “The SCOTUS should have clarified what a natural born citizen is in 2008 when Obama was first challenged.” Chief Justice Waite in 1873 already clarified it, they know what it means. The cowards refuse to address it.
    In words of Clarance Thomas “the Court is evading Obama’s eligibility”

  15. “Supreme Court Justice Thomas; We’re evading the eligibility issue – 4/16/10”

  16. Rush Limbaugh is no more an “author” than Obama is. It time for people to take the blinders off in the right vs left paradigm. It is all theatre and Limbaugh is fed the script he follows.

  17. “The Washington Wrestling Federation- Gerald Celente accurately describes the two party system in America. Watch Gereld Celente, Dr.Robert Bowman and others as they break down the right left paradigm.”

  18. roseandpeony,

    I have some real issues with Rush. This, however, is not one of them.

    The fact that none of these bastards will air anything related to the eligibility issue is what I have a real problem with. They would rather let the country ho to hell some time in the future, rather than upset their money train today.

    I do get tired of all of these creeps hawking their own wares 24/7.

  19. oldsailor81

    I agree that there is a lot to their assertions, but when both of them end up with their heads permanently twisted 180 degrees out of position then and only then will they realise just how bad the entire mess is,and how far it really extends. The CCP might well have incontrovertible,or (IRONCLAD) evidence of wrongdoing by the people in the WACKEY HOUSE,BUT…..as long as the courts remain off limits to US citizens no matter how irrefutable,or ironclad the evidence is it will never be in front of a judge. This can only be changed by WE THE PEOPLE, either PEACEFULLY,or by force, as described in the Declaration of Independence.

  20. oldsailor81

    I have been giving a lot of thought to the LEGAL oath of office which Soetoro repeated line after line,and SWORE TO….UPHOLD. It reads… ” I ___(name)_______________do solemnly swear to UPHOLD the Constitution”…..In this assertion there is implied legal binding….but in so swearing he used a name which was not then legally valid. This makes both he,and the Chief Justice guilty of perpetrating ELECTION FRAUD against the people of America,and treason against the Constitution of our Republic.

  21. bob strauss

    Scheme to Bypass Electoral College Quietly Advances


  22. oldsailor81

    So I ask, if Judge Moore is a devought “10 commandments” person what force is more powerful than the words of God, to which Judge Moore has obviously conceded? Of course we must keep in mind that it has been said by THE WORDSMITHS, that CHURCH should have ABSOLUTELY NO INFLUENCE in matters before a court.

  23. bob strauss

    Climate Alarmists in Denial

    As if this winter weren’t enough, there’s new evidence that the climate is cooling


  24. bob strauss

    Press release: Judge Hollander issues an opinion on only a part of the FOIA request, which necessitates more FOIA filings
    Posted on | May 15, 2014 |


  25. HonorFirst

    But of course!
    Judge: Leaning toward White House privilege claim


    Where is the justice???

  26. Good Morning CW et. al.

  27. citizenwells

    Good morning Zach, et al.

  28. oldsailor81

    Regarding my comment of 2:08 PM
    I probably should have worded it differently,and simply asked ” What force is powerful enough to overide the words of God.” Apparently there is such a force,when the TEN COMMANDMENTS can be just brushed aside like nothing. Judge Moore obviously BYPASSED THE TEN COMMANDMENTS in ruling as he did.That tells me that even God no longer has any significance with respect to our courts. This makes Judge Moore “ONE OF THE PERPETRATORS”.

  29. oldsailor81

    It would appear that Judge Moore used the logic “If you cannot fight them…..JOIN THEM”!

  30. oldsailor81

    The WEED of crime bears bitter fruit,……..CRIME DOES NOT PAY!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s